Share Images Copied to Your Clipboard

This article was written on May 11, 2011 by CyberNet.

Share clipboard images

arrow Windows Windows only arrow
I share a lot of screenshots and images with people, but there are all kinds of tools out there that try to make these tasks as simple as possible. Climsy is one of those apps. We’ve covered several clipboard utilities in the past, but this one serves a single purpose of uploading the images you’ve copied to either Climsy.com, ImageShack.us, or your Dropbox account.

When Climsy detects that there is an image on your clipboard you’ll see the notification pictured in the screenshot above, and the image will be immediately uploaded to your designated service when you click the “share” button. Once the upload is done the notification window will display the URL to the image, and next to it will be a “copy to clipboard” button that will place the link on your clipboard. Then you can send the link to whomever needs to see what you captured.

Here’s a brief list of features highlighted by the Climsy developer:

  • Share your clipboard images over internet or network
  • Support for upload to Climsy.com, Imageshack.us or Dropbox
  • Support for store images to local or network disk
  • Customizable image format (jpg or png) and image compression (jpg)
  • Easy drag’n’drop image to any software (for example Skype)
  • Lightweight application with minimal resources usage
  • Multilanguage support

Climsy is available as a portable application, and on my system it uses less than 1MB of memory. So you won’t even know its there except when you need it.

Climsy Homepage (Windows only; Freeware; Portable)

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Keep Windows Always on Top with DeskPins

This article was written on May 21, 2009 by CyberNet.

deskpins-1.pngarrow Windows Windows arrow
When you’re working around your computer sometimes it can be useful to pin a window to the top. Basically that will ensure that it will stay on top no matter what other window you currently have focused. For whatever reason Microsoft hasn’t incorporated a feature like this into Windows so that it can be done without a third-party tool, but there some programs that already include this kind of functionality (particularly media players).

I know there are all kinds of apps out there that can force any program to always remain on top, but DeskPins is nice because that’s all it does. It has a lot of features that are pretty handing when it comes to pinning windows, such as “autopinning” certain apps. The Autopin mode is useful if you always want, for example, the calculator to be on top you can tell DeskPins to watch for the applications to start, and if it does automatically pin it. You can also assign hotkeys so that you can toggle the mode without removing your fingers from the keyboard.

DeskPins requires a mere 10MHz CPU, 4MB of RAM, and less than 100KB of disk space. So I think it’s safe to say that you don’t have to worry about running out of system resources just because you want to use an app like this.

Get DeskPins for Windows

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Firefox 3.1 to Get More JavaScript Speed Optimizations

This article was written on August 25, 2008 by CyberNet.

fast firefox

Mozilla is looking to drastically improve the JavaScript performance in Firefox 3.1 when it is released later this year. When Firefox 3 was released back in June it included a significant boost in the JavaScript performance arena, but will they be able to do it again?

If you decide to download a nightly build of Firefox 3.1 to test out the improved JavaScript performance it’s important to know that the new JavaScript engine, dubbed TraceMonkey, isn’t enabled by default. To enable it you’ll need to open the about:config and find the javascript.options.jit.content setting. Set the value to true by double-clicking on it, and the changes will be applied without needing to restart the browser. Refer to this article if you need help using about:config.

I know you’re wondering how much better it performs, and so I’ll turn your attention to the Sunspider test, which we’ve used in the past to compare the various browsers. I ran all of the following tests on the same MacBook Pro computer with the Mac OS X operating system (lower amount of time is better):

  1. Safari 3.1.2: 3062.0ms
  2. Firefox 3.0: 2997.2ms
  3. Firefox 3.1 nightly without TraceMonkey: 2510.2ms
  4. Firefox 3.1 nightly with TraceMonkey: 1610.4ms

That’s a rather significant difference. Compared to Firefox 3.0 the new Firefox 3.1 nightly build is nearly twice as fast, and my results are consistent with those that Mozilla got. Bravo!

Behind the scenes the optimizations occur when repetitive tasks are done in JavaScript. For example, the folks over at Mozilla whipped up a quick image editor that lets you adjust the brightness and contrast of a photo. It’s nothing fancy, but there is a noticeable difference using Firefox 3.0 compared to Firefox 3.1 with TraceMonkey enabled. That’s because the JavaScript runs significantly faster due to the image editor consistently repeating the same task. Generally that’s how it works, but the nitty gritty details can be found here.

There’s still some work that needs to be done on TraceMonkey, and some bugs need to be ironed out before it will be ready for prime-time. I’m already getting pumped about Firefox 3.1 though.

Thanks natmaster!

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Where Does Firefox 2 Stand on Vista Compatibility

This article was written on December 20, 2006 by CyberNet.

Several months ago I wrote an article about changing the default browser in Windows Vista Beta 2 and what a pain it was for anyone that had the User Account Control (UAC) enabled. While the purpose of the UAC is to protect the computer from hackers the simple task of modifying or installing something can be quite a pain. The concept of UAC is great, but I am still a little skeptical whether UAC will even help the inexperienced users that always click “OK” or “Continue” just to get the popup to disappear. At least Microsoft can say that they are doing their part.

At the time I was still learning Vista and wasn’t sure if this was some sort of bug in the operating system or if Mozilla had to fix Firefox (and the rest of their applications) in order to change the default program association. It is actually something that Mozilla has to handle themselves and they are working on making Firefox completely compatible with Windows Vista. The latest release, Firefox 2.0.0.1, fixes some of the compatibility issues that have existed, but there are still plenty that they need to conquer including setting the default browser. A comment in that bug report says:

We know it isn’t fixed yet. There is still lots more to be done. It is planned to be fixed for 2.0.0.2. Also, see bug 352420 for some of the additional bugs that need to be fixed.

While 20 bugs still need to be fixed the outlook does look positive since nearly 14 have been resolved (or supposedly resolved). Almost all of the bugs are due to the User Account Control “feature” which hopefully opens the eyes of other software development companies who are just sitting around hoping their software will work fine. I’m hoping that Firefox 2.0.0.2 ships in time for the January 30 release date of Vista, and as of right now it looks like both Firefox 1.5.0.10 and 2.0.0.2 are scheduled for “late January” so it might be close. I’ll cross my fingers and hope that I won’t have to hear the burning question “and why can’t I change my default browser?”

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


A “Hidden” Black Theme In Windows XP?

This article was written on October 28, 2006 by CyberNet.

Apparently when Microsoft was designing the Royale theme for Windows Media Center (the one with the glossy look) they were also pondering whether to release a black version. Apparently they decided against it but it has somehow made its way to the web.

The theme, called Royale Noir, has been signed by Microsoft so it really is believed to be made by them. Here are the steps to install and use the new theme:

  • Download the theme from here
  • Extract the contents of the file to:
    c:\windows\resources\themes\Royale Noir
  • Double-click on the luna.msstyles file to run it.
  • The display properties should now be on the screen, and in the Color Scheme drop-down menu select Royale Noir.

The only thing that is kinda weird which I noticed is when you hover over the start menu it turns from the black button (in the image above) to the green button that we have all become accustomed to in Windows. That’s a little weird but not that big of a deal.

Note: The source below is currently down.

News Source: IStartedSomething [via Digg]

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Ezmo & AllPeers Say Their Goodbyes

This article was written on March 03, 2008 by CyberNet.

allpeers ezmo goodbye

Today marked the death of two great startups: AllPeers and Ezmo. AllPeers is the Firefox extension that originally emerged as a way to share files between your friends and family, and later on they started to support BitTorrent transfers. Having this integrated into your browser is pretty convenient, but it didn’t take off quite like they hoped that it would. They didn’t get the user growth that they were shooting for, and that’s understandable. The extension didn’t last long on my system because it was difficult to find other people willing to install it, which is required if you want to share files with them.

Here’s a snippet from what the AllPeers blog had to say about shutting down the service:

It is with deep regret that we inform our users, friends and fans that we will be shutting down the AllPeers service today. We are tremendously proud of the product that our team has built, and we remain convinced of the potential of adding social features like file sharing to the web browser. However, we have not achieved the kind of growth in our user base that our investors were expecting, and as a result we are not able to continue operating the service.

Ezmo actually sounds like a pretty nifty music sharing service, but I hadn’t heard about it until today. They would let you upload your music to their servers so that you could listen to it no matter where you were at. The software worked with iTunes, Winamp, and Windows Media Player for uploading your tunes, which you could then share with your friends.

They ran into problems when trying to work with the music labels who weren’t very cooperative:

It has always been clear to us that Ezmo had to be a free service for all users. Our revenue model is based on music sales (and promotion), for which one needs at least some sort of cooperation with music labels. We have had repeated meetings and contact with the major labels, but their willingness to cooperate in finding innovative solutions for music sales seems non-existent. Their terms were not compatible with the conditions a small start-up operates under. We still feel absolutely confident that services like Ezmo will have a major significance in the future, but the lack of cooperation and even threats of lawsuits from the labels and their organisations has made intermediate financing paramount in order to secure a necessary time horizon for the company. Without that financing in place, Ezmo has no alternative but to shut the service down and close the company.

So here we are burying two great startups today. The AllPeers site has already been taken down, but the extension is still available on the Firefox add-ons site. Ezmo will continue running until March 14th.

Thanks to Emil for the tip on Ezmo!

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Firefox 3 Performance Gets a Boost

This article was written on February 25, 2008 by CyberNet.

fast firefox

Now that Firefox 3 is approaching the home stretch it is important that Mozilla starts to throw in performance improvements to really make the browser purr. Over in our forum xpgeek pointed out that a Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) build of Firefox 3 had been created which greatly improved the performance of JavaScript in the browser. While PGO itself hasn’t yet landed in the nightly builds there have been some significant improvements to the JavaScript engine.

I’m sure what most of you care the most about are the facts, and so I’ve compiled the results of the SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark test for each of the different browsers. All of the tests below were performed on the same Windows machine, and the Firefox 3 nightly builds definitely came out on top. Here are the results sorted from best to worst (each one is hyperlinked to the full stats):

  1. Firefox 3 Nightly (PGO Optimized): 7263.8ms
  2. Firefox 3 Nightly (02/25/2008 build): 8219.4ms
  3. Opera 9.5.9807 Beta: 10824.0ms
  4. Firefox 3 Beta 3: 16080.6ms
  5. Safari 3.0.4 Beta: 18012.6ms
  6. Firefox 2.0.0.12: 29376.4ms
  7. Internet Explorer 7: 72375.0ms

It’s important to know that every time you run the SunSpider Benchmark it conducts each test five times, and the result is the average of the five tests. So it is a rather thorough test, and definitely shows off the speed improvements that Firefox 3 is going to be bringing to the table.

What does this all mean for you? Depending on what browser you typically use you may not notice a huge speed difference, but the change will be the most noticeable on sites that use JavaScript heavily. With the Web 2.0 era upon us all JavaScript speed enhancements are welcomed with open arms.

Firefox 3 Beta 4 is expected to be released in the next few weeks, and you can expect to see these (and many more) improvements shining through!

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Firefox 3.0 & Opera 9.5 Get Millions of Downloads

This article was written on June 18, 2008 by CyberNet.

In the last week we’ve seen two major browsers, Firefox (review) and Opera, release huge milestones for their desktop software. Just five days after the release of Opera 9.5 they are reporting that there have been an astounding 4.7 million downloads of the browser, thereby averaging almost a million downloads per day. That’s pretty good considering they have 20 million users, which means about a quarter of them have already made the upgrade.

Mozilla, who was going after a Guinness World Record, came barreling through with everything they had. Early in the morning they were having troubles keeping up with the greedy geeks like yourself that just had to be the “first” to get their hands on the browser. Mozilla’s pipes were definitely clogged as they were trying to serve up 2 Gigabits of HTTP traffic per second, plus another 13 Gigabits of downloads per second. While they could have been a little better prepared, that’s like trying to fit a bus through a tunnel the size of a straw. As things began leveling out they were able to get the traffic under control, and averaged 150 downloads per second (9,000 per minute). Not too shabby.

In the end those 9,000 downloads every minute worked out to a total of 8,271,687 downloads of Firefox 3.0 in the first day. That’s over 3 million more downloads than Mozilla was hoping to get! Here’s a breakdown of the top 10 countries according to Spread Firefox:

Note: The download counter still seems to be increasing despite the Firefox Download Day being over. These stats are taken as of June 18th at 1:19PM CST (3 minutes after Download Day officially finished).

  1. United States: 2,582,070 Downloads
  2. Germany: 666,627 Downloads
  3. Japan: 403,417 Downloads
  4. Spain: 298,204 Downloads
  5. United Kingdom: 295,557 Downloads
  6. France: 290,692 Downloads
  7. Iran: 258,774 Downloads
  8. Italy: 244,319 Downloads
  9. Canada: 223,618 Downloads
  10. Lithuania: 213,871 Downloads

Net Applications has also reported on the market share usage of Firefox 3 over the last 24-hours, and it looks as though a good portion of Firefox users are adopting the new browser. Here’s a chart of the market share starting on June 17th at 10AM (EDT), and ending on June 18th at 11AM (EDT):

Market Share for Firefox 3 in the First Day
firefox 3 market share.png

In May 2008 Firefox had an 18.41% market share overall, and according to the hourly reports Firefox 3.0 alone peaked at 4.56% of the total market share. If those stats are anything to go by about 25% of Firefox users are already running the latest version of the browser.

Congrats to both Mozilla and Opera on successfully distributing their browsers to millions and millions of users! If you participated in the Firefox Download Day be sure to grab your commemorative form.

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


CyberNotes: Calculating MD5, SHA-1, And CRC Hash Values

This article was written on December 05, 2006 by CyberNet.

CyberNotes
Time Saving Tuesday

All over the Internet you see things that say MD5, SHA-1, or even CRC. All of that jibber-jabber is in reference to hash values which verify the integrity of a download. Basically, if I wanted to send you a file I would calculate one of those values, send you the file, and then you would calculate the value for the same type of hash that I used. If it matches the value that I calculated then the odds are pretty good that there wasn’t a problem with the file transfer.

How do you go about calculating these values? I have no idea why Windows doesn’t have some sort of right-click menu to do this because they could just hide it like they do with the “Command Prompt Here” for Vista. Luckily there is plenty of software that will do the grunt work for us and the few that I tested even work in Vista (despite them being several years old). Here is a rundown of the solutions I found:

digestIT (Freeware Download)

This is my favorite program for calculating and comparing hash values. It works with MD5 and SHA-1 hashes by providing a simple-to-use right-click menu for any file(s) in Windows. The reason this is my favorite is because it will not only calculate the value but you can also input a hash value and see if it matches the file’s value. That way you don’t have to sit there comparing two long strings of letters and numbers. Here is a screenshot of what digestIT looks like for the whole comparison process:

digestIT

The verification feature is pretty important to me because that is primarily what I need to do. This just makes the whole process a little easier and means I have to think less…which is always a good thing. ;)

 

HashOnClick (Freeware Download)

This one is pretty similar to the one above except that it doesn’t have the verification option. It will only generate the hash value for you and then you’ll have to manually compare it. HashOnClick works with MD5 and SHA-1 but also does CRC hash values. Here is a screenshot of the program being used:

HashOnClick

 

MD5 Column Display (Freeware Download)

This one only does MD5 hash calculations but it is unique in the way it presents itself. You don’t ever have to make an extra click to see that MD5 value because you can set it up to display a column in Windows Explorer for it. Here is what it looks like:

MD5 Column Display

 

MD5Sum Utility (Online Calculator)

That is a site that can calculate nearly all of the different has values: haval, MD2, MD4, MD5, ripemd128, ripemd160, SHA, SHA-160, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512, tiger, and whirlpool. So why wouldn’t you use this? The first reason is that you have to upload the file to their site in order for it to calculate the hash value. It is required (for logical reasons) that the PC doing the calculation has the file on the computer…which brings up another point. If you are having to upload the file to them there is no guarantee that there wasn’t an error in that process. Therefore the file that you have on your PC might be completely intact but when you upload it there is an error which results in a miscalculated hash value. Online hash generators are convenient but not something you should completely trust.

 

Overview

There are all kinds of ways to calculate the hash values but hopefully you’ll find one of those alternatives to work well. There is also a Firefox extension, called MDHashTool, that hasn’t been updated in years that can do the verification of the hash values all from within the browser…but you won’t be able to install the extension in a version of Firefox greater than 1.0.6 without overriding the extension compatibility check. For some reason I thought that Opera had this feature built-into their transfer manager but I looked all over and couldn’t find it. If you have a better/easier alternative for doing this please let me know!

Update:
Nogg3r5 pointed out in the comments below that HashTab is also a great solution. It will put the MD5, SHA-1, and CRC comparison features in the properties tab of every file.

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts:


Firefox 3 Alpha 5 Released…with Places

This article was written on June 07, 2007 by CyberNet.

Firefox 3 Alpha 5
Click to Enlarge

Alright, many of us have been waiting for Mozilla to get Places into the Firefox Alpha releases and it has finally happened. Alpha 5 comes to us one-week late, but marks the beginning of Places which could end up being a beautiful thing. The only thing is that the user interface changes are still very minor so don’t expect to see any of the cool things, but as I previously mentioned Places is indeed working in the background to manage your bookmarks.

The password changes are also quite important for extension developers who leverage off of the current password system in Firefox. Justin Dolske said that "the new Login Manager has one downside… The interfaces for using it have changed, so extensions that might have been using the old interfaces will need to be updated to use the new ones instead." So this is probably the point where you will start to see more extensions fade into the sunset until developers get around to updating them.

Okay, so let’s take a look at the new stuff in this release:

  • Bookmarks portion of Places has been enabled.
  • New crash reporting system, Breakpad. It’s enabled by default on Mac OS X, on about 50% of Windows installations, and not yet available on Linux. You can also view crash reports at this site.
  • New Javascript-based Password Manager. More details available here.
  • Support for Growl notification under Mac OS X
  • Support for native controls on Mac OS X
  • Miscellaneous Gecko 1.9 bug fixes

If that sounds appetizing for you, then the English downloads are currently at your beckon call:

Looking ahead at Alpha 6 (scheduled for June 29) we should see a much more developed Places implemented. This will include a synchronization client, starring and tagging capabilities, and a unified organizer. Also in Alpha 6 should be a better download manager which I believe is very much needed.

Then comes the move into the Beta’s. The first Beta is scheduled for July 31, and by that time all of the features (including the user interface) should be in place. They’ll start working on fixing everything they have gotten implemented so that they can ship Firefox 3 the third quarter of 2007.

Also, development for Opera 9.5 is underway, which is also supposed to bring some nice things to the table. I haven’t seen any official mentioning of new features, but I’m sure the Opera team will thrown in some pretty cool surprises.

Copyright © 2011 CyberNetNews.com

Related Posts: