Kuratas mech robot for sale for $1.25 million

In July this year, we were looking into the Kuratas mech robot which was literally a giant among men, standing tall at 3.8 meters and making sure even someone like the Undertaker would cower in fear when faced with this 5-ton behemoth. Back then, there was no word as to whether it is for sale or not, only given a vague release date of “sometime later this year.” Well, I guess when we talked about “sometime later this year”, that would have translated to right now. Suidobashi Heavy Industry, the company behind the Kuratas mech robot, has already put it up for those who want to are interested in picking it up, slapping a massive 100 million yen ( $1.25 million) price point on it.

Definitely out of reach for just about anyone else, but for those who do have the money to spare, it could very well be a merry Christmas this year. What would you do if you had $1.25 million to spare, would you splash it on something this extravagant? Parking it in the front yard would definitely ward off anyone who wants to wander about without any permission.

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: Kuratas mech robot is too good to be true, Autonomous wearable robot arms turn you into a Doc Ock, sort of,

Following The Letter Of The Law: Apple Publishes Non-Apology To Samsung On Its Website To Comply With U.K. Court Ruling

silver-apple-logo

After losing an appeal in a UK high court last week against a judgement that Samsung’s Galaxy Tab tablets do not infringe the design of the iPad because their design is just not cool enough, Apple has now published an acknowledgement of the court’s judgement on its U.K. website — in line with the court order. You can’t call it an apology — quite the opposite: Apple makes it clear it does not agree with the court’s decision by pointing out that it has had court wins against Samsung for the same design patent in Germany, and noting its huge win against the Korean gadget maker in the U.S this summer.

Apple also focuses on the judge’s reasons for dismissing its patent claim — quoting the judge’s detailed ruling on exactly what makes the iPad’s design so much cooler than the Galaxy Tab, in which he talks almost lovingly of the “extreme simplicity” of the iPad’s design; its “undecorated surfaces”; “crisp edge” and “combination of curves”.

Apple then contrasts that with what the judge had to say about the Galaxy Tab: “very thin, almost insubstantial” with “unusual details on the back” — and the conclusion: “not cool”.

Here’s Apple’s acknowledgment in full

Samsung / Apple UK judgment

On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic(UK) Limited’s Galaxy Tablet Computer, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do notinfringe Apple’s registered design No. 0000181607-0001. A copy of the full judgment of the Highcourt is available on the following link www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2012/1882.html.

In the ruling, the judge made several important points comparing the designs of the Apple and Samsung products:

“The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking. Overall it has undecorated flat surfaces with a plate of glass on the front all the way out to a very thin rim and a blank back. There is a crisp edge around the rim and a combination of curves, both at the corners and the sides. The design looks like an object the informed user would want to pick up and hold. It is an understated, smooth and simple product. It is a cool design.”

“The informed user’s overall impression of each of the Samsung Galaxy Tablets is the following. From the front they belong to the family which includes the Apple design; but the Samsung products are very thin, almost insubstantial members of that family with unusual details on the back. They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool.”

That Judgment has effect throughout the European Union and was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 18 October 2012. A copy of the Court of Appeal’s judgment is available on the following link www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/1339.html. There is no injunction in respect of the registered design in force anywhere in Europe.

However, in a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design. A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple’s design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc. So while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple’s far more popular iPad.

The acknowledgement has not been published on the homepage of Apple’s U.K. website but there is a link to it — right at the bottom of the page, next to the notification about Apple’s use of cookies

In addition to the online acknowledgement of the court’s judgment, Apple is required to publish an acknowledgment as adverts in U.K. newspapers.


Halo 4 is definitely not cheap to develop

You can more or less say that Halo 4 is going to be a definite hit when it arrives on the Xbox 360, considering the large following that the franchise has garnered over the years. The thing is, you know that this $3 billion franchise needs to meet the expectations of the casual gamer, regular gamer and hardcore fanboys, so plenty of work needs to be done to ensure the optimal gaming experience. This translates to pumping in a whole lot of money as well during the development process, with fingers crossed that a lemon will not be produced. When talking to Polygon Microsoft Studios head Phil Spencer described Halo 4 as the “most important entertainment product in the company” and when pressed on whether it is also the most expensive, he answered, “Absolutely. Nothing’s even close.”

Joystiq claims that Halo 3 cost somewhere in the region of $60 million to develop and market, but it paid off in the end since launching in 2007, raking in a cool $300 million globally in its first week of sales alone. This means Halo 4 will definitely cost far more than $60 million, and we will find out this coming November 6th whether it is going to break new sales records or not.

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: Microsoft announces Halo 4 DLC pass for $25, Latest Halo 4 launch trailer shows off gameplay footage,

Assassin’s Creed 3 picks up Ubisoft gong for being most pre-ordered game to date

Just how popular do you think that Ubisoft’s upcoming Assassin’s Creed 3 is? Well, for starters, lets just say that it is going to be a surefire hit, considering how the game has already achieved the status of being the most pre-ordered game by Ubisoft to date. In fact, the previous record holder was (no surprises here) Assassin’s Creed Revelations, and it is interesting to note that Assassin’s Creed 3 has already doubled the previous number held by Assassin’s Creed Revelations, now how about that?

We are talking about pre-orders on a global scale here, and Ubisoft mentioned, “Pre-orders for Assassin’s Creed III at GameStop are 100% higher than last year, putting the game on track to be one of the top titles of 2012. In addition, Ubisoft is offering a Season Pass and high quality DLC available at launch to bring even more excitement to this title.”

Are you one of those who contributed to this record breaking feat? Just so you know, you can enjoy your Halloween when Assassin’s Creed 3 arrives then on the PS3 and Xbox 360, while PC gamers will have to wait until November 23rd.

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: Assassin’s Creed 3 for PC minimum system requirements revealed, drops Windows XP from the mix, Assassin’s Creed 3 multiplayer trailer spotted ahead of schedule,

HTC Best Deals revealed: Bargains sucked to your smartphone

HTC has revealed Best Deals, a new smartphone-based deals service promising time-limited discount shopping directly on your Android or Windows Phone 8 handset. Making its debut on the HTC One X+ and the Windows Phone 8X and 8X by HTC, Best Deals will be available initially in the UK, Italy, Germany, France, and Spain, with over 1,7000 offers from LivingSocial, Trip Advisor, and more.

Qype Deals and Offerum are also contributing offers, with local sorting so that users will be able to sift through cheaper meals, massaging, and the inevitable waxing and hair treatments, that are nearest to them. However, HTC says that there will also be deals on the company’s own products and accessories, though exactly what they’ll be is unclear.

Other sorting options will include popularity, the size of the discount, the price, and when the deal expires. Each can be reviewed, bookmarked, or shared; it’s not clear whether, if you share a deal with a non-HTC Best Deals user, they’ll see the same offer, but it seems likely.

In addition to the 8X and 8S, and the One X+, the HTC One X and One S will also get Best Deals in a subsequent firmware update. HTC hasn’t said when that new firmware will arrive.

At launch, twelve deal providers are involved with the app. HTC says it’s working on adding more to that list, as well as introducing new categories. Partnerships with mobile operators are also on the cards.


HTC Best Deals revealed: Bargains sucked to your smartphone is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


T-Mobile Galaxy Note 2 has LTE radio built-in

Unlike folks in Malaysia who had 1,400 or so units of the Samsung Galaxy Note 2 stolen from the airport, the T-Mobile version of the Galaxy Note 2 is said to come with a future proof slant, where it already comes with a LTE radio underneath the hood, making sure that should T-Mobile one day decide to finally make available LTE connectivity to the masses on their network, it should be a simple thing to release a firmware update for the Galaxy Note 2 so that it will work on the new LTE network then. I guess you can call this to be some sort of future proofing a device when it is released, although T-Mobile’s version has LTE inactive at the moment. To put it in a nutshell, the hardware that you are getting from AT&T and T-Mobile are the same, it is just that T-Mobile’s Galaxy Note 2 has disabled its LTE radio for now.

Having said that, it should spark a glimmer of hope among T-Mobile subscribers that they could be rocking to a LTE network in the future. The big question is, when will that happen? Only time will tell, but we won’t be just sitting down and doing nothing in the mean time.

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: T-Mobile’s Samsung Galaxy Note 2 now available for purchase, Samsung Galaxy Note 2 from T-Mobile arriving this fall,

iStrike Shuttle’s payload are ping pong balls

Flying drones are not new anymore, but how many of them carry a payload of ping pong balls that it drops on your target? Here is a Kickstarter project, the iStrike Shuttle, which will function as an iOS controlled drone which will carry ping pong balls, looking for unsuspecting victims to scare or surprise them with. The concept was launched at CES last year, and it has gotten its fair amount of attention, and since then, the folks behind the iStrike Shuttle have been hard at work to develop the iStrike Shuttle, making sure it is primed and ready for production.

The thing is, it is 28 days away from its goal of $30,000, having collected $4,581 so far. We are rather miffed that there is no Android version of the app to control the iStrike Shuttle with, as it should not be too hard to develop the app front for Android, leaving this only to be an iOS exclusive at the moment. It will take some fair amount of practice before the iStrike Shuttle is deadly accurate in your hands.

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: Unlace makes short work of nasty, tangled up cables, The Bräuler Modular Growler System helps ensure your beer stays fresh and crisp by injecting CO2 into it,

Apple posts passive-aggressive “Samsung didn’t copy” statement

Apple’s legally-mandated acknowledgement that Samsung did not copy the iPad has gone live on the company’s site, though the Cupertino firm does not shy from the opportunity to get a few digs in at its Korean foe. The acknowledgement page, linked from the footnote of Apple’s UK homepage, quotes the relevant court order and then the section of the original ruling in which Apple’s own products are praised for the “striking” nature of their “extreme simplicity” and “cool design”; it also mentions the judge’s comments that Samsung products “are not as cool.”

It’s the final paragraph where things get particularly passive-aggressive. Although Apple was instructed to publicly announce that Samsung had been deemed not copying the iPad with the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9, adn Tab 7.7, the firm also takes the opportunity for a reminder that other courts haven’t felt the same way.

Apple cites the Germany case, where Samsung was found to be guilty of unfair competition, and the recent US case where it was awarded more than $1bn in damages. “So while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement,” Apple concludes, “other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple’s far more popular iPad.”

It’s not clear whether Samsung will have any room for legal complaint about Apple’s choice of phrasing. The court ruling insisted on a certain minimum font size for the text, but didn’t set out exactly how it should read. It also said that Apple could host it on a separate page, linked from somewhere on its homepage.

The statement will have to remain in place for at least a month, and as well as appearing on Apple’s site, the company will be publishing it in various magazines and newspapers in the UK.

Samsung / Apple UK judgment

On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited’s Galaxy Tablet Computer, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple’s registered design No. 0000181607-0001. A copy of the full judgment of the High court is available on the following link www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2012/1882.html.

In the ruling, the judge made several important points comparing the designs of the Apple and Samsung products:

“The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking. Overall it has undecorated flat surfaces with a plate of glass on the front all the way out to a very thin rim and a blank back. There is a crisp edge around the rim and a combination of curves, both at the corners and the sides. The design looks like an object the informed user would want to pick up and hold. It is an understated, smooth and simple product. It is a cool design.”

“The informed user’s overall impression of each of the Samsung Galaxy Tablets is the following. From the front they belong to the family which includes the Apple design; but the Samsung products are very thin, almost insubstantial members of that family with unusual details on the back. They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool.”

That Judgment has effect throughout the European Union and was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 18 October 2012. A copy of the Court of Appeal’s judgment is available on the following link www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/1339.html. There is no injunction in respect of the registered design in force anywhere in Europe.

However, in a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design. A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple’s design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc. So while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple’s far more popular iPad.


Apple posts passive-aggressive “Samsung didn’t copy” statement is written by Chris Davies & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.


LG Nexus 4 to come in white as well?

The Galaxy Nexus was first introduced with just one color option that was similar to Henry Ford’s Model T – it came in just black. Of course, it took a fair number of months before a white version of the Galaxy Nexus was revealed to exist, but somehow or rather, that version never quite made it to US shores. LG could have taken a look at the Nexus’ past and decided to do things differently instead, by working on a white as well as black color version of the upcoming smartphone.

What you see above is a screen capture of a computer system from Carphone Warehouse, and this is the very same company that put up the Nexus 4 webpage for just a while (no idea on whether that was just on purpose to stir the hornet’s nest or by accident). Since Carphone Warehouse is a UK retailer, there are no promises that the white version of the Nexus 4 will arrive Stateside, but one can always hope, can’t we? Would you be happy with a white version of the Nexus 4, or is black good enough for you?

By Ubergizmo. Related articles: Nexus 4 support page goes online, LG Nexus 4 pre-order page goes live for one online retailer,

Apple adds 8 new currencies to App Store, adjusts prices

Earlier this week, Apple notified developers that iTunes Connect would undergo scheduled maintenance on October 25 from 12pm to 7pm. Following this, an announcement went out stating that support for 8 new currencies had been added, as well as a handful of other features. Contained in the message was this tidbit: “Also, note that we have adjusted the retail price for the Mexican Peso, the Euro, and the Danish Kroner.”

Users noted yesterday that the pricing for several European countries had changed in the App Store, with the base price of €0.79 jumping to €0.89. Thus far, the price change has been observed for Germany, Denmark, France, The Netherlands, Italy, Slovenia, and Belgium, among others. It is speculated that Apple is adjusting the prices to deal with increased local taxes in the affected countries.

This is amidst the support for eight new currencies: Turkish Lira, Indian Rupees, Russian Rubles, Indonesian Rupiah, Israeli New Shekels, South African Rand, Saudi Arabian Riyal, and the UAE Dirham. The addition of these currencies means that App Store users in the related countries can now make purchases in the local currency rather than in USD. In the long run, this could increase the use of paid apps in specific locations and encourage developers to create more localized products.

According to the message Apple sent to developers, starting in November reports will be available for the eight new territories as their own regions. Revenue from sales made prior to this will be detailed in the “Rest of World” financial report in USD, while all future reports for those regions will appear in the local currency. Developers can find out more by checking out the “Rights and Pricing” section on iTunes Connect.

[via TNW]


Apple adds 8 new currencies to App Store, adjusts prices is written by Brittany Hillen & originally posted on SlashGear.
© 2005 – 2012, SlashGear. All right reserved.