After going through a year-long rigmarole of summonses and interrogations to find out why Australians are being overcharged by as much as 66 percent on digitally-distributed Apple, Microsoft and Adobe products, and how the practice of “geo-blocking” prevents customers from seeking fairer prices elsewhere, an Australian parliamentary committee has finally hit on a solution. In the words of committee chairman Nick Champion, speaking to ABC News:
“What we want to do is make sure that consumers are aware of the extent to which geo-blocking applies to them and the extent to which they can lawfully evade [it].”
Now, if you were hoping that the Australian government would somehow force these companies to drop their prices down to US-equivalent levels, then this quote may admittedly sound a bit weak. It might also seem impractical, since geo-blocking is designed to be difficult to evade, by binding a customer’s IP address, credit card or other details to their home market. Then again, things start to make more sense when we factor in the committee’s other suggestions.
In particular, it proposes that the country’s Copyright Act be amended to make it clear that an Australian won’t be prosecuted just because they annoyed a multinational tech company by circumventing its geographic restrictions — and, indeed, the population as a whole should be taught “tools and techniques” to achieve this wherever possible. The committee even recommends that Australians should have a “right of resale,” such that they could legally remove locks on digital content that limits it to one user or one ecosystem. We have no idea how seriously the government will take these ideas, or how quickly it may implement them, but the committee’s defiant tone makes for some good reading at the source link.
Filed under: Home Entertainment, Portable Audio/Video, Internet, Software, Mobile
Via: ABC News, HotHardware
Source: Committee report (PDF download)
Are you still reeling from the disturbance in the Force when you heard that 
Bluetooth headsets are plentiful in the market, and it is not too often that you see a smartphone manufacturer take the time and effort to allocate some resources for a niche market, working on something that is not their forte. LG, however, has just introduced the LG BTS1 Bluetooth Headset in South Korea, where it is relatively tiny with measurements that would rival that of a matchbox (we are talking about 35.9mm × 50.2mm × 19.2mm) here.
The 
Advertising is an industry that works on metrics and the more detailed the information of their target demographic, the better. In fact, you could say that the digital age has brought about a change in the way advertising works, with targeted adverts that are based on your web browsing history becoming an established force online for quite some time now. The thing is, how will the general masses react should advertisers begin to point out one’s habits and interests whenever we are offline? Do you think that this is an invasion of privacy on an unprecedented level?
