Plants vs. Zombies Garden Warfare Hits PlayStation Consoles This August 19


When Plants vs. Zombies Garden Warfare was announced at E3 in 2013, there was one particular question that rang loud and true, and that would be, “When is PvZ Garden Warfare coming to PlayStation?” We are pleased as punch to bring you word that at long last, Plants vs. Zombies Garden Warfare will be making its way over to the older generation Sony PS3 as well as the best selling Sony PS4 this coming August 19th, 2014. Yes, this goes to show yet again that good things come to those who wait, doesn’t it?

I guess the earlier speculation that the PlayStation platform would be on the receiving end of Plants vs. Zombies Garden Warfare has turned out to be true after all, allowing PlayStation fans to experience the Garden Variety and Zomboss Down expansion content right from the very beginning.

Plants vs. Zombies Garden Warfare happens to be a different take from RTS-style game of the original namesake, as it was built using the Frostbite 3 engine. You will be able to team up with four players in the wave-based Garden Ops game mode, or opt to engage in some major mayhem on the battlefield with 24-players all duking it out in some intense tactical action. To be able to enjoy Plants vs. Zombies Garden Warfare in Full HD graphics is one thing, as well as the ability to play it via Remote Play on the PS Vita expands your horizons even more. August cannot come fast enough now! [Press Release]

Plants vs. Zombies Garden Warfare Hits PlayStation Consoles This August 19

, original content from Ubergizmo, Filed in Gaming, , , ,

Beats Music Has Subscriber Base Of 250,000 Users

Beats Music Has Subscriber Base Of 250,000 UsersOne of the biggest news in the tech industry in recent days would be the sale of Beats to Apple for a cool $3 billion, and certainly that purchase would not have made sense if the only reason was to take advantage of the number of users who happen to subscribe to Beats Music which at last count since its official launch three months ago, stood at a paltry figure of 250,000. The 250,000 figure was shared by Beats co-founder Jimmy Iovine at the Re/Code Code Conference, which is more or less the same place that Iovine had less than flattering words for Apple’s headphones.

250,000 happens to be a good 50,000 more compared to what industry analysts had originally estimated, where majority of those subscribers happen to hail from Beats’ deal with AT&T. Other than that partnership, Beats has not had an easy ride in gathering an audience, which could be another reason as to why Beats decided to sell itself off to Apple.

It depends on what kind of magic is Apple going to weave when it comes to the Beats brand, but it will still take some huffing and puffing especially when you take into consideration that the existing market leader, Spotify, happens to be riding high on 40 million active users and approximately 10 million paid subscribers.

Beats Music Has Subscriber Base Of 250,000 Users

, original content from Ubergizmo, Filed in Audio, ,

GM Executive Thinks Google’s Self-Driving Cars Could Be A Threat

GM Executive Thinks Googles Self Driving Cars Could Be A ThreatGoogle is not a company known for their automobiles, although the company does have plans to develop one that can drive itself. However it seems that Google’s plan for a self-driving car is apparently important and big enough where GM’s executive VP of global product development, Mark Reuss, felt that it could be seen as a threat in the automobile industry.

Speaking to Bloomberg, Reuss was quoted as saying, “Anybody can do anything with enough time and money. If they set their mind to it, I have no doubt that they could become a very serious competitive threat.” A couple of days ago, Google unveiled their latest self-driving car prototype.

The vehicle is small, almost like a Smart Fortwo. It is made from roam and has a flexible windshield to reduce damage during an accident, and will do away with a steering wheel, an accelerator, and a brake pedal. It even took out the back seats, meaning that only two people could ride in the vehicle at the same time.

So how does this tiny vehicle seem like a threat? Well like Reuss said, anyone with the time and money could accomplish something, and the fact that California plans on issuing licenses to self-driving cars soon will probably further this cause. Google is not alone in their efforts, as we have seen GM, Nissan, and Volvo working on self-driving cars of their own.

GM Executive Thinks Google’s Self-Driving Cars Could Be A Threat

, original content from Ubergizmo, Filed in Transportation, , ,

Ban Bitchy

You could call us pushy, or stubborn. You might even call us bossy. And unlike Sheryl Sandberg and her “Ban Bossy” BFFs Beyonce, we’re fine with that.

Being a strong woman means being outspoken, independent, and incredibly confident. So, sure, call us whatever you want.

Just don’t call us bitchy.

We’re not bitchy. We’re bitches.

Watch “Ban Bitchy”:

Alyssa Wolff and Alison Leiby are comedians who live in New York City. They are authors of Lean Over and Marry Smart…OR DIE.

Alleged iPhone 6 Backplate Leaked

Alleged iPhone 6 Backplate LeakedWe have come across many iPhone 6 mockups in the past, some of which are designed based on alleged leaked schematics, and some were made by case manufacturers to test their cases with. Now according to Australian website, Macfixit, they claim to have received a photo (to the right) which supposedly shows off the back cover of the iPhone 6.

It’s a bit hard to tell the size of the phone based on this photo, but presumably it will be either the 4.7-inch or 5.5-inch variety, two sizes which the iPhone 6 is rumored to come in. The color of the iPhone 6 will not be green, and the green color is probably a film used to protect it from scratches. As you can see in the camera cutout area, there is a hint of silver, suggesting that this could be the backplate for the silver model.

The design also seems to be in line with what we’ve seen so far. The edges appear to be more curved, at least compared to its predecessor, the iPhone 5s. Oddly enough the backplate’s flash cutout shows that it only has room for a single flash, suggesting that Apple might have gotten rid of its True Tone flash.

This seems unlikely since it was one of the features Apple marketed heavily with the iPhone 5s, so it doesn’t make sense that Apple would remove the feature so fast, unless of course they found a better solution.

Alleged iPhone 6 Backplate Leaked

, original content from Ubergizmo, Filed in Apple, Cellphones, Rumors, , ,

Whose Sharia Is It?

It has been a lousy month for Islamic law.

First, there was the kidnapping and sale of Nigerian girls by Boko Haram, which claimed religious acceptability for their acts. As Muslim theologian Jerusha Lamptey opined, this is not my sharia.

Then, the Sultan of Brunei’s horrific new penal code came into effect. Unlike the Nigerian girls, where a social media campaign garnered White House attention, the Brunei law gained visibility because the Sultan-who is dictating law that his track record suggests he does not observe-indirectly owns the famous Beverly Hills Hotel. Hollywood figures have objected to the rules, due to come into effect next year, which would punish proven male-male anal sex with death. (As far as I know, the code does not prescribe any particular punishment for lesbian acts, though the rhetoric has become that the new law prescribes “stoning gays and lesbians.”)

Claims like that of the Sultan or Boko Haram that “Islam” demands implementation of “sharia” ignore the complex reality in which there is not now nor has there ever been a uniform set of identifiable rules that Muslim scholars have agreed on much less that governments in Muslim majority countries have implemented over the centuries. As I wrote elsewhere, so-called sharia laws on the books in Brunei, Nigeria, Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, or Morocco are not directly revealed by God. They are human products with human histories negotiated in human contexts. The pretense that these laws are straightforward implementations of God’s will not only serves to justify these otherwise unjustifiable rules but also feeds the demonization and dehumanization of Muslims. Though happening on two continents and perpetrated by two quite distinct sorts of actors – a multibillionaire monarch enmeshed in global capitalism and a militant anti-Western, anti-government insurgency – the Nigerian kidnapping and the Brunei law became exhibits A and B for the vilification of sharia.

And then I heard an NPR story about Sudan’s intended flogging and execution of Meriam Ibrahim for apostasy and illicit sex. My first response, as someone who writes and teaches about Islamic law and is committed to understanding it in all its historical complexity: how barbaric.

That was followed by resignation. Why bother to advocate for more sophisticated understandings of Islamic law? What is the use in pointing out that the claims of timelessness authenticity are groundless? So what if these versions of Islamic law are selective, partial, implemented by dictators with populist pretensions and monarchs with captive constituencies? They still apply it. And yes, it’s true that Americans generally aren’t interested in threats to Muslim lives or well-being or African lives or well-being except when there is a sensational story to be made (drone attacks don’t cut it). Doesn’t matter; this is still happening, and it’s wrong.

My “what’s the use?” phase shifted into the simmering anger phase once I began to think about why exactly this version of Islamic law holds sway. It’s patriarchy straight down the line.

The charge of apostasy is based on the claim that Ibrahim was born Muslim: her religion follows that of her (Muslim) father, who left her (Christian) mother when Ibrahim was young. She was apparently raised Christian. Patriarchy allows interreligious marriage between a Muslim man and a Christian woman, but not the reverse, and supports the presumption that the child’s religion follows that of its father.

The charge of illicit sex for which Ibrahim has been sentenced to lashes results from the court deeming her marriage to a Christian man void. Since she is considered Muslim (because of her father’s religion), and since, unlike the situation in her parents’ marriage, marriage between a Muslim woman and a Christian man cannot be valid, the court determined that she had sex outside of marriage. Her toddler, and the child growing in her belly, prove her offense. Score another one for patriarchy.

According to reports, Ibrahim’s case was brought to the attention of the authorities by some relatives (presumably Muslim ones) who objected to her marriage to a Christian. As far as the charge of illicit sex goes, a premodern court would almost certainly have applied the doubt rule: essentially, if there are any grounds for exoneration – such as the fact that the woman thought her marriage was valid – avert the punishment. Apostasy, too, seems to have been seldom punished in practice, however strongly the rule was upheld in theory. One can make a case that as with Brunei’s new penal code or the Boko Haram kidnapping, the Sudanese verdict represents a modern and profoundly problematic view of Islamic law.

At the moment, though, I am less interested in insisting on the nuance and variability of traditional Islamic law and more on critiquing its powerful patriarchal presuppositions. However tempered they were in past practice by judicial clemency, they lay the ground for the charges against Ibrahim. Of course we need to remember that context matters: we will not understand these developments in Nigeria or Brunei or the Sudan without reference to national and global politics, economics, and – in the last case – individual family dynamics; Islamic law is only part of the picture. And yet it is a key piece of the picture. Rethinking Islamic law without questioning its basic presumptions about male dominance will not take us nearly far enough.

Whose sharia is this? It is certainly not mine. I cannot believe that it is God’s.

This blog first appeared on Feminism and Religion

iOS 8′s Split Screen Multitasking Feature Might Skip WWDC [Rumor]

iOS 8s Split Screen Multitasking Feature Might Skip WWDC [Rumor]One of the drawbacks to iOS 8 is that you can only use one app at a time. This is compared to other platforms, like Microsoft’s Windows platform, that allows for more than 1 app to run simultaneously, kind of like a desktop operating system where you can have multiple apps running at once.

However that is supposed to change with iOS 8, at least according to previous rumors which suggested that iOS 8 would be bringing split screen multitasking to the iOS platform. Given that iOS 8 is expected to be unveiled at WWDC 2014 which is kicking off next week, we expect that we would learn more then, or would we?

According to a recent post by the New York Times’ Brian X. Chen, he claims that split screen multitasking will not be debuting at WWDC 2014. He claims that while the feature will be a part of iOS 8, it isn’t ready for show yet, meaning that if you were hoping to catch a glimpse of it next week, you’d be out of luck.

In fact according to a previous rumor, it has been suggested that some iOS 8 features are being delayed as Apple has pulled engineers from the iOS 8 team to work on OS X 10.10, kind of like how OS X’s team members were pulled to help get iOS 7 ready on time. The report stated that the “missing” features would then be introduced in iOS 8.1, which is reportedly already being worked on. In any case we guess we will learn more next week, so check back with us then for the details.

iOS 8′s Split Screen Multitasking Feature Might Skip WWDC [Rumor]

, original content from Ubergizmo, Filed in Apple, Cellphones, Rumors, Tablets, , , ,

Man Convicted Of Small-Town Murders That Frightened People Into Staying Indoors

ROCK ISLAND, Ill. (AP) — A man serving life sentences for two killings was convicted Thursday in the deaths of four others who were fatally beaten with a hammer in a northwest Illinois apartment.

After a little over three hours of deliberations, jurors found Nicholas Sheley, 34, guilty of murder in the deaths of 29-year-old Brock Branson; 20-year-old Kilynna Blake; her son, 2-year-old Dayan; and 25-year-old Kenneth Ulve in Rock Falls in June 2008. The killings were part of a series of crimes authorities say Sheley committed in the summer of 2008, stretching from his hometown of Sterling, Illinois, south to St. Louis. Sheley already is serving life sentences for the deaths of two Illinois men that June. He is due to be tried next in Missouri for the deaths of an Arkansas couple.

Police say the violence was fueled by alcohol and drugs. Prosecutors say he believed Branson was having an affair with his then-wife, Holly Sheley.

Sheley rocked back and forth in his chair as Judge Jeffrey O’Connor read the verdicts. Family members of the victims sobbed, wiped away tears and exchanged hugs to the judge’s words.

“I hope you rot in hell, Nick Sheley,” Jodi Fitzgerald, sister of Brock Branson, screamed as Sheley was led from the courtroom.

The killings in Rock Falls shook the town of about 9,200 residents hard. Local officials have said that after the four were found dead in their apartment, many people in town were afraid to go outside for days.

An autopsy showed all four were killed by multiple blows from a hammer.

“Nicholas Sheley did this. Nicholas Sheley is the one responsible for these murders,” Assistant Attorney General Steve Nate said during his final argument. “Nicholas Sheley killed Brock. He killed Ki. He killed Dayan. And he killed Kenny.”

The prosecution’s case focused heavily on the Sheley’s DNA, which experts said was found in the apartment. Prosecutors also showed images of Sheley taken from security cameras in the days following the killings in which he wore clothing belonging to one of the victims.

Holly Sheley testified that on the night of the killings, the two of them had sex in a pickup truck whose cab was thick with blood. Holly Sheley did not give this information to police until her DNA was found in the truck much later. She was offered immunity for her testimony.

Nicholas Sheley’s attorney, Jeremy Karlin of Galesburg, did not call any witnesses. He has represented Sheley in all of his trials so far. As Sheley has done in the past, he tried unsuccessfully to represent himself in this trial.

The Rock Falls slayings happened just a few days after a previous Sheley victim, 93-year-old Russell Reed, was discovered in the trunk of his car in Sterling, just across the Rock River about 110 miles west of Chicago.

Police said Sheley killed Reed on June 23 as he searched for money to buy cocaine. Five days later, he allegedly killed 65-year-old Ronald Randall in Galesburg and stole his truck — the same vehicle his ex-wife referenced in her testimony. Sheley has been convicted in both of those deaths.

Sentencing in the Rock Falls killings is set for Aug. 11. Illinois does not have the death penalty.

He next faces trial in the deaths of Jill and Tom Estes, a Sherwood, Arkansas, couple who were traveling in Missouri, where prosecutors can pursue the death penalty.

Sheley was arrested on July 1, 2008, outside a bar in Granite City, Illinois, just a few miles east of St. Louis.

Why You're Still Fat

2014-05-29-drinkphotofortheHP.JPGOkay, so the title of this post is a little misleading. I don’t even know you, so how could I know if you’re overweight — or if you are, why you are?

But if you’re reading this because you’re out of ideas and are looking for another one, here goes. Here’s how it unfolded for me.

One evening several years ago I gave up alcohol on a whim. I’d never been much of a drinker, and I was sipping at a margarita at a wedding reception when it hit me: “This feels unnecessary.” I didn’t like the taste of alcohol, and it never made me feel better — only worse. So I quit.

I haven’t missed it.

Several months later I wondered why I ate meat. Every time I ate a steak or even a hamburger I got a headache. So I stopped — and I haven’t missed that, either.

Somewhere along the way I decided instead of having favorite foods, I’d have favorite questions. My favorite question is from Gregg Levoy’s book, Callings: “If your life passed before your eyes, would it hold your interest?” I realized one evening, trying to stop at twelve of my daughter’s French fries, I bored myself. Having the same 20 pounds to lose for most of my adult life was just boring.

My second favorite question of all time is, “What would happen if…?”

The thing that always bothered me about previous attempts to just eat a certain way and be done with it was this. They always involved some combination of eating the “right” things, and rewarding myself with the “yummy” things. The right things were yummy, too — but never, in my opinion, as yummy as the chips and cheese and cookies.

It was a constant tug of war between what I should eat and what I wanted to eat.

It didn’t make sense, either. Why, when I felt so much better on the healthful fare, was my reward to binge on things that made me feel bad? You wouldn’t tell a smoker who finally quit, “Hey, good job! Now, go ahead and enjoy a pack at the bar every Friday evening.” And you wouldn’t encourage a recovering alcoholic to join that person and pound a few down.

You quit smoking or drinking, you quit. That’s what quitting is.

Why is junk food exempt? I knew how addicting a lot of what I’d been eating was. A donut only left me wanting more. A bowl of spinach exacted no such price.

It made me wonder if food that isn’t good for me kept calling because I kept answering.

What if I stopped? What if I gave myself a chance to break what was, at best, a habit?

I wouldn’t have to do it forever.

Just one year.

What would happen if, for a year, I took in only good?

We make promises to kids, and keep them. We forsake all others, in some ways, when we get married. But a lot of us treat promises to ourselves as a running joke. It’s no wonder, as a friend told me once, when New Year’s Day rolls around that little voice inside laughs at our so-called resolve: “Yeah, right.” I wonder about the psychological toll that takes. I wonder how many of the rest of our best-laid plans are derailed because we don’t trust ourselves to do right by ourselves.

What if, in one area of my life, I practiced having integrity — period?

I didn’t know if I was giving up junk food forever, and I thought the most interesting part of this experiment would begin on day one of year two. Had I really had, for example, my last cookie — ever? I didn’t know. I didn’t know if I wanted that to be true. Maybe there was something about my old way of living, at least in smaller doses, that really did make life worth living.

But maybe not.

I felt called to call off junk food for a year, and see what happened.

Here’s what I can report. At the one-month point I was still planning the party I’d have eleven months later. I saw a buffet table piled high with donuts and cookies. Two months in I decided I was never going back to my old ways, that’s how much better I felt and how relatively easy this new way of life was.

It’s been almost five years now, and I can say with confidence: “This is who I am, now.”

Every diet book I’ve perused suggests you reward yourself for being “good” by letting down and having whatever you want for one meal — or even one day — a week. For someone like me, and maybe like you, that’s the undoing. I’m an “all or nothing” gal, and I could never get on top of what now seems an addiction to certain foods.

Are you overweight? Do you tell people you’ve tried everything? Have you tried this?

You might find, like I did, it’s relatively easy — eventually!

A New Line Of SATA 6.0 Gbps SSDs Released By Corsair

Corsair-Force-Series-LX-SSD

Corsair hits back with a new line of SSDs, the Force Series LX. Coming in both 128GB and 256GB sizes, these slim 2.5-inch SSDs (7mm thick) are equipped with MLC NAND Flash memory chips, a SATA 6.0 Gbps interface, a Silicon Motion SSD controller, TRIM support, a MTBF of 1.5 million hours and can deliver read/write speeds of up to 560/150 MB/s (128GB) and 560/300 MB/s (256GB), respectively. The 128GB and 256GB models are available now for $94.99 and $159.99, respectively. [Product Page]