On Fighting for Your Healthy Self

Growing up, I can remember a handful of times in which I would express a longing for a physical attribute I wanted to change. I wanted icy blue eyes like my grandmother’s, but instead I ended up with muddy brown-green eyes that I was convinced looked like duck poop. “Ughhh! Why can’t I have blue eyes?!” I would whine to my mom, who would respond, “You’re lucky you have eyes, and eyes with which you can see!” When I stopped growing at 5 foot 7 inches, I wanted nothing more than to grow three more inches so I could be a better basketball player. “You’re lucky to have legs!” my mom would say. And I would roll my adolescent, not blue, eyes and hiss, Whatever.

These exchanges were quite rare because I seldom expressed outwardly my disdain for my physical appearance, but they have stuck with me. As someone who, from a very young age, never felt completely at ease in her own skin, I figured it was normal to feel that way. Besides, my flaws were so flagrant, I thought, why complain? It would just make the people around me feel uncomfortable, and I certainly didn’t want to be the cause of that. Instead, I decided I would just fix the problem. The “problem” was more or less everything about myself that could be seen by the human eye, or so I thought. Little did I know at the time that the problem was not in how I looked, but how I felt about myself.

This has not been a feeling I simply outgrew as quickly as I did my two-month career playing T-Ball. Learning to love myself has proved to be the greatest challenge I have undertaken in my 25 years of life, and it has not come naturally. No-sir-ee. Having to go to war with one’s own mind has to be one of the most difficult experiences there is, but I can assert that self-hatred is not a good alternative.

An eating disorder caused me to sacrifice everything on account of the belief that my worth was dictated exclusively by my appearance. I was heading straight for the grave with a headstone that read, “Here lies Xtina… she was thin.” Morbid? Totally. But at a certain point, a huge motivator in my recovery became the awareness that my capabilities and potential, even in the most basic sense, were going to waste as long as I was fighting my healthy self, or quite bluntly, dying.

A couple of years ago when I was a patient on an eating disorders unit, the only mirrors available were those that would just reflect the shoulders up. Initially, it drove me into a fury of panic as I worried my body would undergo dramatic change overnight, and how would I know if I morphed into Shrek without a mirror?! But after a few months it began to click — I was feeding myself properly, I was not exercising compulsively, and eventually maintaining a healthy weight without turning to unhealthy measures to do so. Sans mirror, I had to focus on what my body did for me rather than how it looked, something that three years later I am still practicing.

I have had to consciously challenge negative thoughts with positive ones, similar to the way my mother did when I was little. For example, on the days I am bothered by my arms, I remember that without my arms, I could not fulfill my greatest passions such as writing, painting, playing the piano, or poufing my hair. During moments I may be unhappy with my legs, I remember that they have allowed me to travel around the world and enjoy over 20 years of dance (at times on top of bars, because YOLO).

In response to the pressure to be thin, society often tells us, “real women have curves.” In doing so, it has created a dichotomy between curvy and thin, and pit the two against one another as if there were not 7 billion other body shapes and sizes in between “curvy” and “thin” that make up the beautiful, diverse, colorful world in which we live. A real woman, or a real man, for that matter, lives in harmony with her or his natural, healthy state. That may be curvy, and that may be thin. Maybe it’s something in between with purple cornrows and a handlebar mustache. You do you. A person’s “realness” does not necessarily increase with his or her number of curves, and similarly their power and worth do not increase with degree of thinness. Realness comes from being comfortable in one’s own skin and creating a life worth living.

Throughout my 12-year battle with an eating disorder, my body has fought to keep me alive when it would have been just as easy to give up and give out. My body loves me so much that it has healed me time and time again, forgiven me, and given me countless mulligans. I have fought long and hard for every pound and ounce of my healthy self, and it deserves to be defined not by its shell but to be loved unconditionally by the big heart and brave, weird soul it houses.

If you’re struggling with an eating disorder, call the National Eating Disorder Association hotline at 1-800-931-2237.

House Panel Votes To Allow Waivers On School Meals

WASHINGTON (AP) — A House committee has endorsed a Republican plan to allow some schools to opt out of healthier meal standards.

The vote comes as first lady Michelle Obama campaigns in support of the standards. On Tuesday, she met with school nutrition officials who said the guidelines are working in their schools. The rules set by Congress and the Obama administration over the past several years require more fruits, vegetables and whole grains in the lunch line. Also, there are limits on sodium, sugar and fat.

Some school nutrition directors have lobbied for a break, saying the rules have proved to be costly and restrictive.

The Republican provision in an agriculture spending bill would allow schools to opt out of the standards for the next school year if the schools are losing money on meal programs for a six-month period. The House Appropriations Committee rejected, by a 29-22 vote, a Democratic amendment that would have removed the GOP language. A subcommittee approved the spending bill last week.

Republicans have said the standards are overreach.

“Bottom line is schools are finding the regulations to be too much too quick,” said Rep. Robert Aderholt, R-Ala., who wrote the language. “They need more time.”

Democrats said they were concerned the provision was an attempt to permanently roll back the standards.

“We don’t tell kids, you don’t have to take math if it’s hard, science if it’s hard,” said California Rep. Sam Farr, who offered the amendment to strike the provision.

White House Spokesman Jay Carney said the House language “replaces the judgment of doctors and nutritionists with the opinions of politicians regarding what is healthy for our kids.”

The schools pushing for changes say limits on sodium and requirements for more whole grains are particularly challenging, while some school officials say kids are throwing away fruits and vegetables that are required.

The Senate did not include the opt-out language in its version of the spending bill.

___

Find Mary Clare Jalonick on Twitter at http://twitter.com/MCJalonick

In Business You Must Delegate to Succeed

Most small business owners and service professionals are doing way too many things that they could, and should, be delegating to someone else. Are you in this category? Often the excuse used is that there are not enough financial resources to justify the expense, or they feel it’s just faster to complete the tasks themselves. Even if you have an assistant, chances are you are most likely massively under-utilizing them. Either way, you will greatly benefit from identifying tasks that someone else could do, which will free up your time to devote to business development and other tasks that you specifically must do.

Usually you will find that when you invest in help of a bookkeeper, graphic artist, or (virtual) assistant, they can produce the intended result at an affordable rate, and even faster than you could do it yourself. This will allow you to do what you do best: bring in new business, keep your current clients happy, and create new work product. Or, you can “spend” the time to train your assistant to execute simple but necessary tasks, and the return on that time investment is well worth the additional time you will gain in the long run. Again, this allows you to focus on those aspects of your business that only you can do.

You must evaluate your business development and marketing efforts to determine where you need to put your focus. The next logical step is to determine what you should not be doing, and who could be doing it.

Ask yourself these questions:

  1. What am I doing that it would be better, faster and more cost-effective for someone else to do?
  2. What are 3 things you can delegate to others, or pay for others to do?
  3. What would be best for me to stop doing? In other words, what are the tasks that are simple enough to delegate, or are tasks are not in your wheel-house (such as bookkeeping, legal work, filing, faxing, copying, etc.)?

This effective evaluation should reveal to you many tasks that can and should be delegated. No highly-skilled professional should send faxes, make copies and appointments, or run errands. They just shouldn’t, and neither should you! Your time is better spent marketing, planning, meeting with potential clients, and executing sweet-spot, high-revenue generating activities.

If you have an assistant, excellent! They are there to do one thing: assist you. I suggest to my executive coaching clients that they make a list of items that need to be completed. Schedule morning and late afternoon meetings to delegate and review those action items, and then check in at the next meeting for the status and next action steps.

Don’t have a team? You can hire a virtual or personal assistant, get an intern, or hire professional specialists to take those necessary but difficult and/or tedious tasks off your hands. These valuable assets are worth every dime, because they allow you to focus on your core competencies and provide more of your high-dollar services. This will give you a feeling of balance, which in turn lowers your stress level. Then, you’re able to take on or do more of what you want.

Delegating is critical to your future success. Start today by investing in yourself: use your time and money to set yourself up for that future success by engaging those individuals who can make your business success, and life, easier.

Honorée Corder is the best-selling author of eleven books. Check out her new book, Vision to Reality: How Short Term Massive Action Equals Long Term Maximum Results.

'The Bachelor' Couple Already Headed for 'Couples Therapy'

Prepare yourselves “Bachelor” fans, we’ve got some shocking news.

Juan Pablo Galavis, the controversial Venezuelan heartthrob who coined the most annoying phrase in reality dating show history — newsflash: grown women embarrassing themselves on national television don’t want to hear how “it’s okay” — is making headlines again after signing on for VH1’s “Couples Therapy” with girlfriend Nikki Ferrell.

Admittedly, fans of the show probably saw this coming. Galavis broke two of the biggest rules when it comes to “The Bachelor”: he didn’t propose at the end of the season and he never said those three little words every woman on the show wanted to hear, not even to Ferrell. After the finale aired, Galavis resumed his life in Miami while Ferrell still resides in Kansas City, Missouri, and the distance might finally be taking its toll.

Apparently — brace yourself — reality dating shows don’t always make for happily ever afters. Galavis and Ferrell aren’t the first couple from “The Bachelor” to need some relationship advice. Jake Pavella from Season 14 made an appearance on the VH1 show with Kasey Kahl before the two eventually called it quits.

While VH1 has yet to officially confirm Galavis and Ferrell’s involvement in the show, a source told E! News that the couple was definitely on board for Season 5. “It’s true, they’re doing it,” the source said. “The reason it wasn’t put in the press release is due to Juan Pablo’s deal with ABC. It’s not up until August, so, contractually, it can’t be mentioned until then.”

If we can’t count on reality TV to find true love, then what is this world coming to?

Congress Robs Peter To Pay Paul

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House is cutting back armed air marshals but increasing funding to deal with a surge in unaccompanied immigrant children. It’s boosting funding for gun background checks and is resisting tea party cuts to economic development programs. Military readiness is taking a hit to pay for more ships and airplanes.

It’s trade-off time on Capitol Hill. As Congress stands at an impasse on most major issues, it is waist deep in annual spending bills that offer lawmakers secondary opportunities to make policy.

But with agency budgets frozen on average, in order to add money for procurement of Coast Guard ships or to ease a backlog of unprocessed rape kits, the money has to come from a program that somebody else treasures.

As Fitbits for Feelings Emerge, Whither Empathy?

By Eri Gentry

Search Google for “empathy + technology” and you’ll read that “Studies have shown that increased dependence on technology has resulted in the diminishing of empathy,” and ” The Internet desensitizes us to shocking images, diminishing our empathy.” Meanwhile, narcissism (think selfies) and cyberbullying appear to be at all time highs. And reality television is thriving on voyeuristic depictions of human weakness, competition and cruelty.

A definition of empathy:

“The feeling that you understand and share another person’s experiences and emotions.” (Merriam-Webster)

Are we losing touch with one another? Are we sinking towards something like Roman civilization, when bloodthirsty spectators eagerly watched men fight to the death in the name of entertainment, now just on high-def screens?

Or could empathy in society actually be enhanced by the capabilities of technology? Could machines sense our emotions better than our friends and family can, and broadcast that data to them? It’s not a crazy idea. In fact, wearable technologies are starting to emerge that are specifically designed to give viewers a sense of what’s going on inside another person. They may be crude now, but they will get better.

Take a look at the Necomimi product from Tokyo’s Neurowear.

2014-05-29-fibitsfeelingsemerge.jpg
Believe it or not, people really wear Necomimi ears to reflect metabolic excitement in a way they cannot consciously control. (Photo courtesy Neurowear)

It’s a set of brainwave-reading cat ears that perk up when the user is alert or excited, and lay flat when the user is calm. In its concept video, a boy-meets-girl-with-cat-ears story plays out: Boy approaches; girl’s prosthetic EEG-enabled cat ears stand up; girl blushes; boy gets closer.

It is simultaneously ridiculous, cute and relatable. Holding in feelings of affection is so utterly human. Necomimi takes reservation out of the equation. The wearer implicitly creates a new social contract when putting on the headset: anything that excites or bores the wearer will be plainly obvious to observers, be it an advertisement or a married man. It may not be for you, but some people in Japan and elsewhere are using it.

The GER Mood Sweater from the American company Sensoree relies on galvanic skin response and LED-laden fabric to change color with the wearer’s mood. And Heart Spark, a DIY heart-rate monitor necklace made by San Francisco-based Sensebridge, reveals to the world with flashing lights when the wearer’s heart races.

2014-05-29-fitbitsfeelingsemerge.jpg
The Sensory Fiction book-vest takes quite literally the notion that you should “feel” what you are reading. (Photo courtesy MIT Media Lab)

Generating emotion in a viewer is a goal of other new technology. Sensory Fiction, an interactive and wearable book-vest combo created as a prototype by four MIT students, will swell, squeeze, or vibrate against the user as he or she flips pages. Readers can literally feel the plot thicken, joining the protagonist on ups and downs throughout the story.

Empathy changes our brains, hence our behavior. Although empathy-enabling technology can provoke solidarity, it may also contribute to manipulating us, or stimulating irrational decision-making. Politicians and advertising agencies have understood this for a long time. Behavioral studies tell us that we are more likely to donate to orphans identified with photos than with silhouettes. We are also far more likely to opt-in to organ donation when asked in-person by a DMV clerk than on a mail-in form. Images, smells, sounds — which can now be conveyed by various wearable technologies — may subtly guide us toward actions that seem to defy logic. When a would-be elected official rouses audiences with stories of “Mary, the retired grandmother of five, who can’t afford her heart medication,” he is playing on voters’ empathy to win votes for a new healthcare policy, regardless of whether Mary is accurately representative of senior citizens.

The “identifiable victim effect” leads us to become more saddened and outraged by news of the kidnapping and torture of a local girl than we would be by news of thousands dead in a far-off land. Neurally, images of victims activate the nucleus accumbens, an area central to the brain’s reward and pleasure circuit. When we understand the gravity and tragedy of a loss of thousands, it is through reason, not generally because of the effects of images, empathy and nucleus accumbens activation. Brain-imaging technology combined with data analytics is giving researchers more understanding of the neurological and physiological effects of images and stories intended to produce empathy.

Simultaneously, innovation is exploding in several ways that may add further complexity to the empathy/technology nexus. Advances in wearables as well as smaller and cheaper sensors allow weekend tech-warriors to build their own devices that alter our senses, such as Mitch Altman’s “Brain Machine” glasses that use sound and light to stimulate certain brain activity, or the poking machine armband that delivers a physical poke each time your Facebook friends poke you. These are products made mostly for personal use or demonstration, but they show how easy it is to create devices that shape our experience of the world.

The growth of the Quantified Self movement has made it acceptable (in some circles) to wear your digital heart on your sleeve and, soon, products like the Scanadu Scout and Apple’s rumored iWatch, will be able to monitor enthusiasts’ biometrics. It’s not a great leap beyond that to interpreting your emotional state, as the Mood Sweater and Heart Spark are already doing.

The implications of detailed emotional data in business could be far-reaching and extreme. For example, health information coupled with emotional analysis could enable pharmaceutical companies to market drugs in a highly personalized and effective way. Personalized medicine may be beneficial, but imagine ads that can interpret emotions and respond on the fly with targeted messaging. For that matter, any industry with access to such data could fine-tune their advertising accordingly. In mobile gaming, crude emotional targeting is already being attempted, creating personalized and socially networked reward systems. Some argue that games like Candy Crush — today’s top mobile game — are contributing to the demise of gaming by causing millions to spend money on primarily luck-based activities that addict users with the promise of elementary rewards like stars on the screen and social recognition in the game and in social networks. Where will such businesses go as emotional sensing becomes more sophisticated?

The new millenial generation of digital natives frequently shows a greater sense of social responsibility and desire to be connected to one other than previous generations. Many of us want environments, jobs, and products that provide a sense of empathy and fulfillment. Meanwhile, neuroscience, consumer medical devices, and numerous other tools are giving us a deeper understanding of the roots of human sensibility. We may better understand what it means to be human, but the consequences of using these insights are not yet understood. This generation will determine whether we use or abuse empathy.

In the 1987 book, Amusing Ourselves to Death, author Neil Postman posited that Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World got it right, not George Orwell’s 1984. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us.” More recently, Dave Eggers’s novel The Circle, in a sort of homage to Brave New World, makes a similar point about the potential dangers of services like Facebook and Google.

Technology and society now intersect at empathy in ways the world has never seen before. To prevent ourselves from fulfilling Huxley’s prophecy, we must be aware of empathy’s side effects. Once technologies that can affect empathy become commonplace, we may need more technology to protect ourselves. If we manipulate empathy, we cannot forget how it works in society — to bring people together.

Eri Gentry is an economist turned biotech entrepreneur and an advocate for science literacy. She is a science and technology research manager at the Institute for the Future, an independent research organization, and a co-founder of BioCurious, the first hackerspace for biotech.

This article was originally published in the Techonomy 2014 Report.

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.

Redskins' Attempt Troll Their Critics On Twitter Did NOT Go Well

The Washington Redskins’ official Twitter account tried a new social media strategy on Thursday: trolling Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). Reid is one of many who believe the team’s controversial name is offensive to Native Americans and should be changed. Presumably hoping to get diehard Redskins fans to defend the team name on Twitter, those running the account posted a hashtag and urged the franchise’s supporters to tell Reid what the moniker means to them.

It didn’t take long for it to backfire.

Here’s the tweet:

Here’s just a sampling of some of the tweets that followed, ripping the team and its campaign.

Homemade ED-209: You Have 20 Seconds to Comply

Shawn Thorsson built himself a life-sized ED-209 for this year’s Maker Faire. It is awesome and scary. But not too scary. You gotta handle ED-209 just like you would a Dalek. Just run up some stairs as quick as you can. They can’t handle stairs at all.

ed 209 full size 620x465magnify


The detail on this beast is pretty impressive. It even has all kinds of warning labels and some literal Easter eggs. Yes, the warheads on the rockets are really Easter eggs. He built it in 96 days. Given the amount of detail he put into this, that is pretty amazing.

Now we just need a life-size Robocop to go up against it.

[Make: via Fark via Topless Robot]

Skycatch Raises $13.2M To Field Data-Gathering Drones Both High And Low

IMG_4779 Drones distract, drones deliver and drones do battle. But what else can drones do? That was the question facing entrepreneur Christian Sanz when he began building his own drones a few years back, and after exploring various possibilities, including delivery and also simply drawing together audiences of curious spectators, Sanz found a big need drones are perfect for that wasn’t being… Read More

Why Isn't the Guy Who Designed Beats Going to Work For Apple, Too?

Why Isn't the Guy Who Designed Beats Going to Work For Apple, Too?

When Apple bought Beats earlier this week, it also got two high-profile new employees . Dr. Dre is going to work for Apple. So is music mogul Jimmy Iovine. But there’s one surprise: Robert Brunner, the industrial designer behind Beats, is not coming along for the ride. Maybe because he worked at Apple 25 years ago.

Read more…