Elle Magazine's Women in Tech Dinner Reaches for the Superstars

There are networking events, and there are fashion events, and rarely the twain shall meet… unless you were meeting at the the first-ever Elle Magazine Women in Tech dinner at Quince Restaurant. Celebrating the X-chromosomes of tech leaders and changemakers profiled in the magazine’s July issue, the evening honored thirteen distinguished women at the top of their game in both function and form. These women were bold, bright, beautiful, and badass in the very best sense, an unstoppable force of femininity and feminism that coalesced the glamorous group of Silicon Valley and San Francisco powerhouse guests into a temporary sorority on steroids.

As host of the evening sponsored by Verizon, Elle Editor-in-Chief Robbie Myers adroitly attended to the thirteen honorees, and ensured that introductions were made all around. If you need to crowdfund your concept, go get Danae Ringelmann, founder of Indiegogo. If you want to grab a byte from an engineer with 1.46 million Twitter followers, find Padmasree Warrior, CTO and Chief Strategy Officer at Cisco Systems. Danika Laszuk of Jawbone can set you up with the latest wearable technology, Sarah Friar of Square can create a whole new credit category, and Caterina Fake can serve up startups like Findery, Flickr, and Hunch. Want to meet the Martians? The perfectly named Gwynne Shotwell, President of Space X, can advise you how to pack for the eight-month voyage. (Her don’t miss tip? BYOA — Bring Your Own Atmosphere.)

Although many of the honorees and guests had only met that evening, it did not deter a rapid-fire download of meta-data about what mattered: how to get more women enrolling in engineering institutions, how to negotiate VC funding, how to get changed for a fancy dinner in an airport bathroom, which Kleiner Perkins’ Juliet de Baubigny had just done just prior. And because these were women at the top of their game, they didn’t shy away from the really big questions: handling difficult shareholders, managing multiple mentorships, and finding drop-dead shoes that don’t make your feet numb.

No topic was off the exquisitely set table, thoughtfully equipped with ipads containing bios of the honorees and detailed descriptions of Chef Michael Tusk’s exquisitely refined dinner, a test for even the most diet-conscious: tomato fantasia with herbs and basil gelee, lobster-corn risotto, a choice of wild seabass or spring lamb, and a Mars-worthy red planet of a dessert that used glassblowing techniques to render a perfect sugar sphere containing rose, lychee and berry cream. Guests lingered over cappuccino to exchange ideas, ID’s and Instagrams, Tweeting and tagging one another like it was schoolyard recess. It was an unusual night in the Valley, and nobody wanted to disband the temporary girl group of stars that Elle Magazine had put at the top of the charts.

Also honored: Jessica Livingston, Cofounder and Partner, Y Combinator, Jennifer Pahlka, Founder and Executive Director, Code for America, Alison Pincus and Susan Feldman, Cofounders of One Kings Lane, Kara Swisher, Co-Executive Editor, Re/code, Genevieve Bell, VP of User Experience for Intel Labs, and Grace Woo, Founder for Pixels.IO. An equally accomplished guest list included actress Rashida Jones, Valley Girl Jesse Draper, plastic surgeon Carolyn Chang, Silicon Valley Bank’s Michelle Draper, PR powerhouse Brandee Barker, travel titan Ruzwana Bashir, venture capitalist Gina Bianchi, photographer and bon vivant Douglas Friedman, Facebook’s Libby Leffler, Elle Publisher Kevin O’Malley, lawyer and lobbyist Heather Podesta, retailer Sissie Twigs, chic Shoptiques Olga Vidisheva, Anne Waterman, Elle’s Fashion Director Samira Nasr, TechCruch’s Sarah Buhr, startup advocate Julie Samuels, and Enscient’s Shelly Kapoor Collins. Space X’s Gwynne Shotwell brought along her Stanford student daughter Anna Gurevich, whose poise and enthusiasm reinforced the evening’s unspoken theme, that these girls are just getting started as stars of the tech universe, breathing the amazing atmosphere of their own creation

Do Freely

2014-06-30-DoFreely.jpg

What are you doing?

The Practice:
Do freely.

Why?

Most people spend most minutes of most days doing one thing after another. I sure do. Typing these words is a kind of doing, as is driving to work, making dinner, brushing one’s teeth, or putting the kids to bed. For all the “labor-saving” devices of the past 50 years — dishwashers, phone machines, word processors, etc. — most of us are laboring more, not less. For example, in terms of employment, the average work week in America has gotten longer over the past 50 years. Meet someone and ask how he or she is, the answer is likely: “busy.” Doing is a huge part of life, yet we don’t usually bring much awareness or wisdom to it.

Sometimes doing feels good. There could be a sense of flow in everyday activities, pleasure in your own skillfulness or competence, or fulfillment in helping others.

But often doing feels numb, or worse: on your feet for hours, grinding through repetitive tasks, zipping from one email to another, worried about performance, pressured and driven. In America and elsewhere, the relentless pace of stressful doing gradually wears down mental and physical health, and fuels conflicts with others. It’s a big problem, with many costs.

How does your own doing generally feel for you?

Personally, I’m a big-time do-er. Like most of us, I could and should do at least a little less, and spend more time just being rather than doing. But meanwhile, we still have a lot to do, much if not all of it toward wholesome ends, from putting bread on the table and helping with homework to expressing our abilities and helping the world be a better place.

So the crux is not so much the doing itself but our relationship to it. How can we do what we do without getting pressed and stressed, contracted and driven, about it?

How?

For me, the essence of the answer is to do freely — to feel at ease in the experience of doing, not trapped or bound up in it. Here are some things that have been helping me with this.

Keep returning to the high priority things — like taking care of your health, making room in your heart for others, or protecting time for the important-but-not-urgent tasks at work — and let the little ones go. In the old saying: If you’re filling a bucket, put the big rocks in first.

Feeling responsible for what you don’t have the power to accomplish is doomed plus bad for you and others.

Be mindful of the sense of pressure. It’s a clear sign that you’re getting caught up in doing. When you notice this, exhale slowly. See if you can keep on doing — even quickly — while also feeling more relaxed and at ease.

Do one thing at a time. Bring mindfulness — sustained moment-to-moment awareness — into the doing. Develop this steadiness of mind, this continuity of presence, through activities like meditation, making art or music, yoga, or committing to stay focused in everyday activities such as brushing a child’s hair.

Feel the completion as you finish each thing you do. For instance, take a second to notice that you have placed a plate in the dishwasher before moving onto the next dish. After arriving at work, let it land that this part of your day is now behind you After talking with a friend, let the experience reverberate in your mind for a breath.

Try to experience doing as living. For me this feels like using a computer or driving a car or talking with someone as simply being an animal — a friend once called me “a large male mammal” — moving through its day. The sense of living then moves to the foreground, with doing as a matter-of-fact, no-big-deal, expression of embodied life. It’s a subtle shift, but a powerful one.

See if you can regard experiences of doing as “empty”: made up of many parts based on many causes that come and go transiently, so that any single experience — lifting a spoon to your mouth, making a bed, reading a book — is “empty” of absolute self-existence. Like the suggestion above, this one is also subtle, yet as this felt recognition of the emptiness of experiences of doing grows in you, you’ll find that you feel freer in them, and take them less personally.

Last, make the offering (you might like the JOT that focused on this particular practice). All you can do is the best you can do: you can tend to the causes, but the results are out of your hands. For example, all you can do is say what is in your heart as sincerely and skillfully as you can, but what others do with that in their own minds is up to them, not you.

In sum, simple activities such as brushing one’s teeth, or more complex ones such as running a meeting or writing a report, are an opportunity right under our noses, many times a day, to come into mindful presence, feel freer, and be at peace.

Rick Hanson, Ph.D., is a neuropsychologist, a Senior Fellow of the Greater Good Science Center at UC Berkeley, and a New York Times best-selling author. His books include Hardwiring Happiness: The New Brain Science of Contentment, Calm, and Confidence (in 14 languages), Buddha’s Brain: The Practical Neuroscience of Happiness, Love, and Wisdom (in 25 languages), Just One Thing: Developing a Buddha Brain One Simple Practice at a Time (in 14 languages), and Mother Nurture: A Mother’s Guide to Health in Body, Mind, and Intimate Relationships. Founder of the Wellspring Institute for Neuroscience and Contemplative Wisdom, he’s been an invited speaker at Oxford, Stanford, and Harvard, and taught in meditation centers worldwide. A summa cum laude graduate of UCLA, his work has been featured on CBS, BBC, NPR, CBC, FoxBusiness, Consumer Reports Health, U.S. News and World Report, and O Magazine, and he has several audio programs with Sounds True. His weekly e-newsletter – Just One Thing – has over 100,000 subscribers and also appears on Huffington Post, Psychology Today, and other major websites.

For more information, please see his full profile at www.RickHanson.net.

Review of <i>Straight Expectations: What Does It Mean to Be Gay Today?</i> by Julie Bindel

2014-06-28-straightexpectationsbookjacket.jpg

Gay adolescents today are faced with a much more welcoming world than when I came out. Legislatively we have never had it so good and are now almost equal with heterosexuals. The big businesses who would once fire us now embrace the “pink pound” with relentless vigour. Even the unthinkable has happened — the Conservative party has endorsed us. Far from being the “pretend families” of Thatcher’s era, we can now marry and adopt children. On paper it really does look like gay people have made it — but what are the hidden costs?

It’s this brave new gay world that Julie Bindel deconstructs in her book Straight Expectations: What Does It Mean to Be Gay Today? Bindel’s thesis is controversial: the once flourishing lesbian and gay movement has completely sold out in the face of assimilation. We’ve been “duped” and are now pathetic shadows of our former selves, “a cowardly mass of apologetic sops”, grovelling for crumbs from a largely conservative society, who exploit us for our disposable income. To quote an early, typically caustic jibe:

“the gay rights movement has not just lost its teeth, it is operating like an elderly claret-soaked Tory making his way to the bedpan in the corner of the room: bloated, smug and plodding.”

There’s certainly nothing pedestrian about this book — it’s shamelessly ambitious, tackling all the hard hitting issues related to being gay today, from marriage, kids and bigotry to whether homosexuality is in the genes; Bindel steadfastly contends that sexuality is a choice and even maintains we’re playing into bigots’ hands when we say we were “born that way”.

But it’s over gay marriage that she really takes no prisoners: she sees it as one of the last outposts of patriarchy — an anachronistic institution which precipitates the oppression of women. Bindel is a proud “radical lesbian feminist” and understandably confronts the key debates from this standpoint: it is women who suffer the most from matrimony, she persuasively argues, but — more controversially still — she boldly claims that David Cameron’s support of gay marriage is little more than a ploy to divert attention from the other, more vital issues, such as anti-gay bullying in schools, the organised prejudice of religion and the plight of lesbian and gay people abroad.

Conscious that she seemed like a lone voice in objecting to gay marriage, Bindel polled 5,492 lesbians and gay men and 4,036 heterosexuals to reveal people’s real attitudes to homosexuality; 88% of respondents supported equal marriage. She examines these responses at length, returning to them repeatedly throughout the book, resolutely going against popular opinion as she reasons that lesbians and gay men — by jumping on the marriage bandwagon — have opted for “ordinariness” rather than the more revolutionary concept of “alternative lifestyles.”

Bindel’s rage at the current state of play burns through every page, but is juxtaposed with moments of surprising poignancy as she reflects on her own early days as part of a very different “community” — that of the Gay Liberation Front, which is the point of comparison on which much of her argument rests. The GLF, we are reminded, was an organisation which didn’t advocate for a seat at the table, but wanted to overturn that table — not just for gay people, but for heterosexuals too. Society was intrinsically corrupt — an avaricious, capitalist conspiracy resting on outmoded power dynamics. Nothing less than a complete overhaul was acceptable.

What’s really disappointing for Bindel is the failure of gay people to live up to these early promises and, most importantly, to their potential as gutsy outsiders. She carefully summarises ground-breaking moments in the gay rights movement, signposting where she believes things began to fall apart. Through her own back story we’re shown the moment when gay men and lesbians broke away from one another as they challenged Aids and Clause 28 in the 1980s. Clumping the two groups together is not only foolhardy, Bindel stresses, but more contentiously:

“until gay men recognise that lesbians suffer the double bind of sexism and anti-lesbianism, and that the two operate together like a pernicious form of social control, we cannot effectively work together in a way that will benefit both groups equally.”

The text is peppered with quotes like this — uncompromising and rabble-rousing, but convincingly argued.

But neither do lesbians get off the hook — crucially, it’s the failure of both gay men and gay women, who have either become “too tired to fight any more or too conservative to want to dismantle the remaining oppressive structures”, who really irk Bindel. These individuals are so desperate to be accepted that they’re not just aping straight people, but — worse still — aping the most conservative of straight people – those who have sold out to a Faustian pact where “profit has trumped politics”, in a gay commercial playground which values “equity over equality.”

We’re living in a time when although people are unhappy with the status quo they are often afraid to speak out; causing offense is a definite no-no. Given this, it’s refreshing to read a book that not only questions the state of the the gay nation — the “new normal” — but systematically rips into it. Bindel’s irascible, impassioned, but always compelling voice reminds us what activism is about; change can only happen when you nail your colours to the mast. And that, Bindel concludes, is what the next generation of gay men and women must do — will they “fit in or fight?” The future of the gay and lesbian movement now rests with them.

Julie Bindel’s Straight Expectations: What Does It Mean to Be Gay Today? is published by Guardian Books and is available to buy online.

Shakespeare Runs Free

2014-06-28-Huffpostfreeshakespearebig.JPG

I grew up in New York City where Free Shakespeare in the park and the Joseph Papp Theater became a summer institution not to be missed; one of the many magical things about New York. Imagine my delight as a now loyal Los Angelino when I discovered the Independent Shakespeare Company Los Angeles and their extraordinary free summer program in Griffith Park with their returning ensemble of well versed multi-talented performers.

I’ve been watching the ISCLA’s summer program since 2010 enjoying the tragedy and comedy onstage while experiencing the tragedy and comedy of my own picnic dinners which have become more and more elaborate. Quote from my then eleven year old son on their Macbeth last summer after the bloody finale: “Dad that was in the top five things of anything I’ve ever seen!” And this from a kid with a PS3. How’s that for cultural impact?

David Melville and Melissa Chalsma, the co-founders of the company, started their first summer program over ten years ago in a smaller park, on a smaller stage with an $800 budget. “I had to jump off stage as Hamlet and stop a soccer game that was running towards our audience,” says David thinking back to those days. The two met onstage in the 1995 production of Hamlet starring Ralph Fiennes. “I was ‘woman in back row’,” says Melissa who directed this year’s festival’s “Twelfth Night” which opened last Thursday, and stars as Kate in “Taming of the Shrew” their second play this summer. The couple married 10 months after meeting on Broadway and now have two children. They are also the co-creators of what has the feeling of the start of a Los Angeles institution. No small feat.

“It may feel like an Institution, but it’s completely grass roots,” says David. Melissa agrees; “All those people giving us $20 or anything they can. It’s what actually keeps us going.” Their current budget for this summer’s festival is $350,000. Quite a jump from where they started. But they have to pay city staff during each show, pay their actors, pay for light and sound equipment, the list goes on. When I met Melissa she was unweaving material that had been sewn into her sweater which had been just used as wardrobe. And David recalls seeing an actor on stage in a nice jacket that he thought might look good on him. Then he realized it was his jacket. To mount this program every year is a challenge. And to move ahead with such brazen positivity when they’re not sure where the budget is coming from is quite a commitment. “Classical plays should be readily available to all,” it says on their website. “Like all great art they are a vital part of forming bonds within our community as well as to the past.” They practice what they preach.

I visited them at their rehearsal space in Atwater Village a week before opening night in small comfortable space lined with racks of costumes and props. Part of the unusual fun of getting to see a returning ensemble cast is recognizing the players as they evolve through different characters year after year.

Imagine my delight when I entered to see Macbeth (Luis Galindo) sitting on a couch next to Dogberry from Much Ado About Nothing (Danny Galindo) and the Queen from Hamlet (Bernadette Sullivan) all chatting during their lunch break.

Melissa was directing the final scene of Twelfth Night with the full cast and the big question was ‘how does Malvolio enter? David, who alternates directing and performing duties with his wife threw out some ideas, as did other cast members. The free and easy style is unusual in an industry where theaters can have rigid hierarchies. Yet this is part of their unusual design. “Most theaters release the cast after a show and re-cast new people when the next one starts,” says Melissa. “We have a troupe, a regular company who we know so well.” David points out that their growing following starts emailing them when they announce their summer shows and tries to guess which actors will be cast in what rolls. “It’s a great side to it,” he says.

They also try to keep the shows approachable. “Shakespeare’s fool (Feste) in this show is joking about events and politics from 400 years ago that no one knows about,” he says. So they make sure to take the liberty of a few modern ad libs, as well as a minimalist and modern costuming style. Their art design is neither period, nor contemporary, but somewhere in the middle; late Victorian or early 20th century, and it works.

Watching the show opening night was another deliver on a promise. Yelling out to the crowd as he welcomed them, David was greeted by a roar of applause. Then he began the show which started in twilight and ended under the stars as Shakespeare’s confused and bedraggled company finally confronted one another and found happiness. The performer’s love of the material is effusive and their enthusiasm is contagious. At each show the troupe surprises and delights. They will possibly step over you as all of their world is a stage including the audience. Sitting out in nature watching Shakespeare’s plot lines crash together makes one feel transported back to a time when the work was current events.

At the finale the crowd cheers and rise to their feet. Afterwards they greet and congratulate the performers who stay on stage to interact with them and happily accept donations they desperately need.

Melissa comes out and stands next to David. She’s beaming. “This is our biggest opening yet,” she says smiling, with a look that says, “It’s all going to happen somehow.”

Maybe they are an institution after all and she just doesn’t know it yet.

The Independent Shakespeare Company’s program runs through the summer in Griffith Park and now winter at their Atwater location as well. They can be reached at www.iscla.org, for their summer schedule, donations, new winter program and yes, even auditions.

'You're Smarter Than You Look'

This piece first appeared on DANKE MAG. Visit dankemag.com. Follow Danke Mag on Twitter: @dankemag.

I am (a fake) blonde and have large breasts. I am also a writer, employed and pursuing my Master’s. I’m half Mexican, have two dogs and usually show up to work sweating. I am often convinced I have a mustache. Sometimes I eat entire pizzas by myself. I have a strange and delusional fear of getting dosed with LSD.

These are things that make me “me.” These are all things that have nothing to do with each other. Right? Right.

Since we agree, please do us all a favor and remove the phrase, “You’re smarter than you look” from your vocabulary.

I hear it all the time. “You’re so much smarter than you look.” I have yet to determine whether I look like an imbecile or am actually intelligent; I assume it’s the former.

I never associated appearance with intelligence. After all, I was raised in Los Angeles, and I only knew attractive people. (Just kidding! Sort of.)

I grew up admiring my grandmother — the ultimate manifestation of beauty and brains. My grandmother is a very successful businesswoman as well as proud owner of a shoe collection so impressive it would shame Carrie Bradshaw all the way to Queens. Her constant nagging was a staple of my childhood — I didn’t (and don’t) wear enough “rouge.”

See, feminism! A pretty lady who cares about looks and clothes made it to the big time! What do you mean sexism? What do you mean we don’t take women seriously?

Well, when she was written up in a world-renowned business magazine a few months ago, they breezed over her remarkable contributions to the business and marketing world and diverted the piece to focus on her gracious hosting and flawless mascara application. Mind you, this was in a business magazine. Not Glamour.

This is nothing we’re not used to.

I spent the entirety of my formative years living in constant torment and agony as a result of my appearance.

In middle school, fellow classmates berated and teased me about my bra size. Some girls took photos of me when I wasn’t looking and posted them to their LiveJournals. I was the girl with really big boobs. Boys fondled me, girls tore off my pants in the hallway, boys teamed up to take off my shirt on the bus once on our way back from community service.

The school principal told my mother that the bullying was my fault.

“Maybe she shouldn’t wear so much makeup.”

A few years later I was sexually assaulted. I was also blamed for that. Because I wear makeup, because I’m a girl, because I look the way I do and don’t feel the need to hide it.

I’d like to think that the one thing that can’t be taken from me is my brain.

But I was unpleasantly greeted by a strange form of same-sex sexism when I began my undergraduate career at prestigious, competitive and outright pretentious liberal arts college.

The school was sort of like a nineties high school movie flipped on it’s side in an alternate universe. Everyone dressed the same — think Randall from Clerks. It was like an acid-infused rustic jungle rampant with overmedicated, flaccid lit majors and their miserable, undyed-virgin-hair-having, perfect straight-across-bang-strutting-clog-wearing female counterparts.

(I believe there’s a term for this now. ‘Normcore.’ Buzzfeed told me that.)

There was a group of kids my friends and I called the “Literati.” My off-and on-again hipster douche boyfriend was a member. He is the most infamous “Woah, you’re smarter than you look. I only wanted to hook up with you ’cause I thought you were a dumb slut.” (True story. Romance.)

The Literati was cool. They liked poetry. They discussed philosophy. They were angry and brooding and took Ancient Greek. My friends and I, however, were sort of a mismatched group of girly girls who found each other in the hall of our party dorm — we really liked boys, we really liked drinking and we really loved blasting Miley Cyrus (Yes, pre #BANGERZ) in our dorms and jumping on our beds.

What people thought of this behavior became very apparent when I began dating my Literati boyfriend. People couldn’t believe “he was dating someone like me.” We “didn’t make any sense together.” People asked what we talked about. What did we have in common? Did I even read books?

I was seriously asked if I read books. No, I’m a Literature major. I do not read books. I am writing my thesis on Listicle Theory.

My Literati boyfriend begged me to wear less makeup, more sweaters and dye my hair back to brown. (Yeah, he hated my blonde.) I started to listen. I also developed a very intense addiction to benzodiazepines around this time. Clearly, I was not doing well.

My Literati boyfriend trained me to “look smarter.” Contrary to popular belief, my hair color did not affect my intelligence. It did affect my happiness, though, and I am very gratefully back to blonde.

People still tell me that “I’m smarter than I look.” They are usually impressed that I have read one book. And they are genuinely surprised when my Tumblr (lots of sparkles and Britney Spears) is mine while DANKE MAG is as well.

I subconsciously recite my resumé and accomplishments to everyone I meet. I cling to my qualifications and GPA, for they are the only thing that will separate me from being “just a girl.” My LinkedIn profile is plastered with glimmers of hope — one girl’s impressive resumé is one man’s clean slate, and mine is the key to traversing the line into “equal to.”

It’s 2014. A man walks in and greatness is expected. A woman walks in and greatness is a huge surprise.

We aren’t smarter than we look. We’re just very smart.

And you look very dumb for thinking like that.

2014-06-30-ScreenShot20140630at6.19.40PM.png

7 Animated Music Videos You Should Know

The entertainment site WatchMojo.com publishes daily video segments featuring episodes such as the Top 10 Ridiculous 90s Videos. Their clips contain witty commentary and are perfectly timed at 10 minutes or less making it a great site for the YouTube loving procrastinator.

During a recent browse of their site I discovered a clip for the best animated music videos. Everyone from The Gorillaz to Arctic Monkeys made the list. After watching videos like Aha’s “Take on Me” my partner and I spent the rest of the night viewing the videos our new friends at WatchMojo forgot to mention. Take a look at some of my picks below.

Blockhead – The Music Scene
Animated/Directed by Anthony F. Schepperd

Damon Albarn – Everyday Robots
Video concept and direction by Aitor Throup
Editor: Giorgio Gremigni (The Butchers)

Kraak & Smaak – Good For The City (feat. Sam Duckworth)
Directed by Jonathan Irwin

Bo Saris – The Addict
Directed by Tim Fox

Peter Bjorn & John – Young Folks
Animation by Graham Samuels
Directed by Ted Malmros

The Shanghai Restoration Project – New Tea (feat. Neocha EDGE)
Artwork by members of the Neocha EDGE Creative Collective

Shugo Tokumaru – Katachi
Directed by Kijek/Adamski

Why This Accident Made Me Smile

This week I was on my way home from work and was stopped at a red light. The car at the light in front of me was also stopped and blocking much of the entrance to a business I was trying to enter. I was trying to figure out if there was enough room between my car and the one in front of me so that I could squeeze into the parking lot.

As I was making those mental measurements, I was suddenly thrown forward and caught by my seatbelt. A quick glance in my mirror and I realized a truck had just smashed into the back of my car and was pushing me into the car in front of me. I heard metal bending, saw steam start to come from under my hood and felt the pain from being thrown forward at a high velocity.

The end of the story is that a driver coming up behind me hadn’t realized that everyone was stopped at a red light and had just slammed into my car pushing me into the car in front of me. In short order the police, fire, and ambulance were on the scene and the little area of the street was a flurry of activity. It was a hot day and I was standing on the sidewalk watching all the activity. A woman from one of the shops along the street came up to me and asked if she could get me a glass of cold water. All of a sudden my mind left the accident and focused on the kindness of this woman. She didn’t have to leave what she was doing and come check on me. She made the offer out of kindness.

Remember the verse in Matthew 10 that says this: And if you give even a cup of cold water to one of the least of my followers, you will surely be rewarded.

You see, I’m certain Christ really knew the impact of giving to someone else… the power of simply kindness. When the woman at the accident asked me if I wanted some cold water, it really wasn’t about the water. It was about a woman showing an act of kindness to someone she didn’t even know. At that moment there were no racial differences, social status concerns, or philosophical differences. There was simply a woman who wanted to show she cared about me and extended an offer to help.

I’ll never know this woman’s name but she has made me look at Matthew Chapter 10 through totally different eyes. I hope that as you have opportunities, you, too, will offer a cup of water whenever you can.

You may view more writing from Dr. Myers here. Videos may be viewed here.

Sexual Rejection From Your Partner Damages Your Self-Esteem

Do any of these this sound familiar?

You finally have a romantic night out with your spouse or partner but they drink too much and fall asleep on the bed as soon as you get home.

You’re on vacation and away from the stresses of daily life but your partner claims they’re still too exhausted to have sex.

Your partner consistently goes to bed either before or after you do.

2014-06-20-ID100265464.jpg

The bathroom or kitchen might be the most ‘dangerous’ rooms in the house for sustaining physical injuries but as far as self-esteem goes, the bedroom is far worse. Small sexual rejections are common in relationships as no two people are always going to be in the mood at the exact same time. However, when your partner consistently avoids sex and intimacy, or on the rare occasion when they are willing, are obviously doing so reluctantly — the accumulations of repeated rejections are likely to have a big impact on your self-esteem.

All rejections hurt because your brain reacts to them in very similar ways that it does to physical pain. But when the person rejecting you is your partner — the person who knows you best in the world, the person who sees you for who you are, the person who is supposed to love you and make you feel loved — the damage to your self-esteem, feelings of self-worth, and emotional wellness can be devastating.

Unfortunately, sexual rejections are far more common in long-term relationships than most people realize. At first, people typically deal with such rejections by expressing disappointment, making off-hand comments, or resorting to passive-aggressive behaviors in the hopes of their partner getting the hint. Even when the subject is broached directly, the reluctant partner will typically make excuses or engage in feeble efforts that might not last.

After a while, most people stop bringing it up altogether. The rejection is painful enough as it is, and you probably don’t want to subject yourself to further disappointment and even greater rejection. The pattern of avoidance thus becomes a stable aspect of your relationship but your self-esteem continues to erode, your relationship satisfaction continues to drop, and your general sense of happiness and emotional well-being continue to decline.

Is it worth trying to do something about about it?

Yes! By doing so you might actually improve the situation and you can definitely improve your self-esteem. Here are the steps to take:

1. Invite your partner to a ‘talk’: Make sure you will not be interrupted and that you have their full attention.

2. Tell them how you feel non-judgmentally: They are likely to be defensive so if you want them to hear you, use I statements to present the facts (“We haven’t had sex in two years and I feel hurt and rejected.”

3. Allow them to respond without interrupting: Your spouse may be unaware of how you feel so allow them to respond. If they make excuses such as “You know how much pressure I’m under at work,” or “You know how tired I am after taking care of the kids,” you can say, “I do. Have you been aware of how terrible I feel because of this?”

4. Assert your need for change: Assertive behavior is a great way to build self-esteem. Clearly stating you need the situation to change, that it cannot go on, gives your partner as well as yourself, the message that you deserve better and are worthy of more. Doing so is an important step in shedding the insecurity and doubt that have plagued you and rebuilding your self-worth.

5. Insist on a plan for change as well as regular check-ins: Be open to making changes yourself if your partner asks for them and they are reasonable. Ask for one small step you can both take right away to signal your intention to work on this issue. Decide on a regular monthly check-in to make sure things stay on track.

Lastly, some people might fear their partner will simply state there is nothing they can do about the situation even after hearing how it impacts your self-esteem and emotional health. If that is the case, you at least know the reality and can begin thinking about whether the situation is acceptable to you or whether you need to consider alternative decisions. In either case, you can take steps to prevent further damage to your self-esteem and emotional wellness and to begin the process of rebuilding your self-worth.

Photo courtesy of freedigitalphotos.net.

Britannia: Life Lessons Aboard the Royal Yacht

2014-06-24-AboardtheRoyalBrittania.jpg
With Roger Moran in the Tea Room aboard the Royal Britannia Yacht

What American could resist a bird’s eye view into the private enclaves of British royalty? Not this one. Epecially when it provides some unexpected insights.

It was my last day in Scotland, my final morning in Edinburgh. Checking out of my hotel, I debated whether to head to the train station or find one more point of interest before returning to London.

Stepping outside, I inquired with two local women enjoying a stroll. Would they recommend a visit to Edinburgh’s local docks?

They exchanged doubtful looks while assessing the city’s waterfront merits. Then, as if arriving upon a shared moment of illumination, the two announced in stereo, “the Britannia!”

“What’s the Britannia?” I asked.

“It’s the royal family’s private yacht. Consider it the equivalent to your American White House on the water.”

I was intrigued. But my ignorance was revealed again when I learned this famed yacht was decommissioned back in the ’90s. The Scottish ladies didn’t seem to mind. “You’ll love it,” they promised.

With little time to spare, I returned my bags to the hotel and jumped on the first bus to my newly inspired destination.

Britannia was worth the trip. Last in a long line of vessels commissioned by Britain’s royal family, the ship is a quiet and understated gem. With period details intact and plenty of floors to explore, it’s ideal for experiencing intimate history aboard the House of Windsor’s most modern — if not final — buoyant home.

I loved my visit.

The ship informed me about British protocols, challenged some of my mindsets and humanized public figures.

For example, despite employing a large onboard staff (waiters carefully measured length and distance between plates, glasses and silverware before meals) and paying homage to traditional British pomp (a royal marching band accompanied Her Majesty on all official visits), the vessel is of simple and almost spartan design.

True, Britannia does house Queen Elizabeth’s custom Rolls Royce for official transportation while at port. However, this royal yacht is devoid of the fine fabrics, fussy accoutrements and gilded fixtures I anticipated on a floating palace.

Instead, Britannia’s 1953 commissioning was carefully designed in low profile fashion. Its modest design acknowledges Britain’s lean, post WWII years and reflects its owners’ desire for a relaxed, “country home” environment.

I’d heard of her frugality, but it turns out Queen Elizabeth is unapologetically thrifty. A recovered, century-old sofa in the Admiral’s quarters caused me to ponder the monarch’s extreme sense of economy. Apparently, Her Majesty recycles sheets and furniture for as long as they remain functional — if not threadbare.

A final note could hardly go without mentioning: The honeymoon suite of Charles and Diana.

The suite features the ship’s only double bed (every other bed on board is a twin) which Charles bought in anticipation of his honeymoon with the young princess. Nearly colorless, its presence appears more obligatory than desired. A lone photo of the new couple still sits atop their nightstand, a reminder of a cold and loveless marriage.

I never got to watch Charles and Diana’s 1981 wedding. My husband and I married a few days earlier and were away on our own honeymoon at the time.

Yet as I took in the royal couple’s sanitized surroundings, I compared them with our own honeymoon in Acapulco. Our welcome accommodations were enhanced by tropical pools, acres of lush landscape and strolling guitarists who serenaded us over intimate dinners. Beauty was everywhere, but our greatest joy was in celebrating the start of our new life together.

So as if suspended in time and space, I exchanged thoughts of my happy honeymoon with what I imagined to be Princess Di’s experience. My heart sank for the young bride’s private disappointment. Was this budding princess hiding private tears while the world marveled at a veneer?

The encounter brought an unexpected — if not surreal — element to my visit aboard the Britannia. It was a tangible reminder of how money, titles and privilege cannot guarantee peace, happiness or love.

Children’s fairy tales often conclude with the words, “. . . . and the Prince and Princess lived happily ever after,” but such was not the case with Charles and Diana. Princess Di’s fairytale marriage turned tragic and today she is formally replaced by Camilla.

I left the ship with a universal reminder.

Few of us possess blue-blooded titles or claim vacations aboard private yachts, but we can all seek a love that money just can buy.

So whether you’re living in a lavish castle or just a small studio apartment, here’s wishing you plenty of happiness, joy and love in life!

But don’t go just yet. Join me aboard the Britannia with Roger Moran, an engaging Irishman who serves as the perfect “host” for visiting guests.

Welcome aboard and hope you enjoy your visit, too!

Teaching Our Kids to Be Robots

Nothing makes me feel inadequate like reading the tech news. Seems like every day some young person sitting in a garage somewhere gets an idea, finds an engineer to turn it into an app, figures out how to monetize that app or sell it to Facebook, gets mired in a lawsuit about intellectual property, has embarrassing old e-mails published on Gawker, settles that lawsuit, and winds up in the pages of Forbes and hosting a Ted Talk on how their small idea started a virtual revolution.

It was my understanding that I had until I was 50 to really make it in the world, or at least to achieve the kind of financial security that allows you to buy all your fruit organic. But now, millennials are parading around Silicon Valley like they own the place and the truth is many of them do.

These twenty-something tech entrepreneurs prove that you don’t need to spend years toiling in the mailroom in order to get to the top. Great success can be just a few clicks and advanced HTML code away.

It’s easy to get caught up in the excitement and the possibility of this wireless world, where all good ideas are equal and you can strike it rich before you’re legally allowed to rent a car.

Yet, I have such doubt about what is happening to our souls in this age of artificial intelligence. To call upon the words of journalist Syd Harris: “The real danger is not that computers will begin to think like men, but that men will begin to think like computers.”

I’m not one to stand in the way of human progress, without which we might never have string cheese or cronuts or American democracy. And I don’t want to join a chorus of people throughout history who have irrationally feared change. I certainly wouldn’t have wanted to be one of the paranoid naysayers who thought that once the Wright brothers successfully flew one plane, we’d all grow wings or that our Minnesota cousins would drop in too much.

But I lie awake at night worried we are too mired in and reliant upon technology; that we are too consumed to stop and think about its potentially damaging effects on the human experience.

When we were small, we dreamt of becoming marine biologists or firemen.

Today, we are raising kindergartners who will grow up imagining the trajectory of their lives completely differently. This summer, kids will go to start-up camps and learn to code. They will be encouraged to follow the paths of people not much older than them, whose precocious success they will try to emulate. They will be taught to simplify and look for solutions to all of life’s little inconveniences. They will grow up in a world that values expediency, correctness and punctuality.

And if we’re rearing children in a world that is obsessed with how technology can help us avoid error and save time, we must be careful not to completely diminish the great joy that is found in the small and happy accidents of life.

What did we ever do without our smartphones, we think to ourselves, as we tuck them in under our pillows at night and carry them into the bathroom with us in the morning. Our gadgets are part and parcel of our mundane lives. They tell us when to get up and what to wear; which roads to avoid; how to book a flight or buy a book without ever leaving our living room. There are apps that do our laundry and order us take-out, and do everything else to provide for the perfect Friday night with our cats.

Our devices take care of all the details, short of brushing our hair for us. Of course, some smartphones don’t think we need to brush our hair and are programmed to remind us we are naturally beautiful.

It’s tempting to think that we will one day be able to avoid all the small indignities of life that punctuate our existence: forgetting the words, missing the bus, stepping in a puddle, spilling a latte down the front of our new J.Crew button down that we bought to look like a professional.

But, as they keep developing iOS systems and Android updates to meet our every need, we may lose what makes us the most unique species second to the yeti crab: the ability to be wrong, to crash, to wait, and to wonder without consequence.

What did we ever do without our smartphones? We lived! We frolicked! We mistook strangers for friends and got on the wrong bus which took us somewhere great anyway.

Some of the best parts of ordinary life are when things go slightly awry, the kind of serendipity that only arises out of a pure mishap. If we never miss another light or run another stop sign or let the elevators close on our hands, then how will we ever meet Hugh Grant?

As humans, we are accident-prone. We walk into things, we fall down, we crash into each other and break hearts and bones. We burst into tears in public and our cars stall. We forget our umbrellas and confuse the rain for a sign that the heavens are unsympathetic. We mix up ingredients and names and end up making brownies that taste like dish soap.

We lie. We make things up. We get things wrong, from directions to baseball statistics to the name of our first-born cat.

But it is those moments of error that cause us to think, to re-examine and to explore. Technology can deprive us of these times of reflection and creation.

And it’s not just me saying this. Scientists have proven it! When we let our technology do too much of the planning and thinking for us, we use our brains less and cause what scientists call biological atrophy. We may actually be getting stupider for all of our “smart devices.”

In all this so called advancement, we are losing what differentiated us from the start: The ability to make a great big mess.

Who will we be if we aren’t the the thinking, neurotic, irritated, hungry, problem-solving beings we’ve been since Cro-Magnon times?

Perhaps we’ll become more like the computers who serve us — boring and predictable and vulnerable to fates worse than the heart-bleed bug.