Hasta La Gadget!

Google’s plans for satellite-based internet access just got a little more concrete. The Wall Street Journal hears that the search firm is planning to build 180 “small, high capacity” satellites (not pictured here) that will go into low orbit and…

Apple’s iBeacon technology was revealed in WWDC 2013 and according to a report from The Wall Street Journal, it seems that Apple has more details about the technology that they are planning on sharing at WWDC 2014. They also state that Apple will be placing iBeacon transmitters across the Moscone Center that will help teach developers on how to better implement the technology in their apps and services.

Unfortunately apart from that, not much else is known about what Apple has planned for the technology. It is assumed that the upcoming announcement could be about Apple unveiling possible partnerships with companies that would use their technology. While it might not be unveiled yet, perhaps we could learn more about Apple’s plans for their own mobile payment services.

So far we have seen how iBeacon is used in various industries. For example we have seen how iBeacon is used by airline companies, used in retail stores to help guide shoppers around the shop, and even used in video games. For those unfamiliar with iBeacon, it’s basically a piece of technology that allows iOS devices to communicate with beacon devices via Bluetooth.

For example when you enter a store, the beacon will pair with your iOS device to notify you of sales. It has been suggested in the past that supermarket aisles could sport individual beacons that would notify shoppers that about discounts about particular products. Earlier this year, CES 2014 organizers used iBeacons during the event to conduct a scavenger hunter.

Apple To Share More iBeacon News At WWDC 2014 [Rumor]

, original content from Ubergizmo, Filed in Apple, Rumors, ibeacon, wwdc, WWDC 2014,

LISTEN HERE:

After 219 years, “Justice” Scalia found a right to guns in Heller. Now Michael Waldman’s new book explains why the Court was wrong and how public opinion & law can shift. Also: Frum & Corn debate the Obama scandal of ‘refusing to start unnecessary wars.

On Waldman’s book & Rodger’s massacre. Host, David Corn & David Frum interview Michael Waldman (head of Brennan Center at NYU) about his new book, The Second Amendment: A Biography. He explains why the Roberts Court wrongly applied reasoning about a “well-regulated militia” from the 18^th century to 21st century America without any – a view Chief Justice Warren Burger called “a fraud” as recently as 1991. But the problem now for gun safety advocates is as much cultural as constitutional since “a 1^st gun is like a bar mitzvah for rural WASPs”(Waldman adds, “hope they enjoy it more than I did mine”).

Then Frum & Waldman discuss the differences between handguns and long-guns historically and legally – and Corn & Waldman describe how intensity beats majority in our democracy since the NRA has stalled reforms supported by 90% of Americans.

Waldman & host conclude that people dismayed about 32,000 gun deaths a year (homicides & suicides & accidents) should not just throw up their hands. “The system couldn’t move in a few short months after Newtown…and it took 12 years from Brady was shot to the Brady Law,” says Waldman. He adds hopefully that, while there are more guns than ever, the number of people owning them is going down and so are gun-related crimes.

NRA opponents – now including Gabby Giffords, Michel Bloomberg, Newtown families, Richard Martinez (“Not One More!”) – will have to change public and jurisprudential opinion over years before changing public laws, just as gun rights people did leading up to the 2008 5-4 Heller decision. Over time, change is both essential and feasible, like: ballistic stamping and smart guns; more federal funds for research into gun crime; background checks for gun shows (Manchin-Toomey); a return to a ban on broadly defined assault weapons; and – since Left and Right both deplore mentally ill people getting access to guns — a mental health registry of troubled people named by parents or doctors who would then have to affirmatively justify why they are fit to own a lethal weapon. We can call it “The Lanza Law.”

Host: As the debate grows with each new tragedy, Waldman’s book could be to gun safety what Piketty’s is to inequality – a catalyst altering views and laws.

New laws like those listed above won’t be enacted soon given the NRA hammerlock over key members and a GOP House. But looking beyond 2014 mid-terms, a re-elected Democratic president in 2020 with governors redrawing congressional lines could well produce a Congress more sympathetic to Gabby Giffords than Wayne LaPierre. Even the 100 Years War ended.

On Obama’s West Point Address & Cheney as a ‘Lost Causist’ The consensus on guns in America did not reappear on guns abroad, a.k.a. war. What did our two Davids think of Obama’s attempt, in effect, to lay down an “Obama Doctrine” to explain his foreign policy past and future?

“Not very well,” says Frum. “It was a defensive speech that tried to explain his failures. Red lines have been crossed and re-crossed like in a hockey game, China is surpassing the US in GDP, then there’s the Ukraine…You knew he was in trouble when he used the trope that I could something crazy like X or like Y but instead I’ve done something else. FDR would simply say, ‘We today landed at Normandy!…And he gave no explanation why we did what we intervened in Libya but not in Syria.”

Corn strongly disagrees. “There may be no explicit ‘Obama Doctrine’ but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. We’re not in a bi-polar world but maybe a quadra-polar world” where there’s no one formula that fits all situations. Also, decimating al Qaeda central, killing bin Laden and using drones are no one’s one’s definition of “weak,” the conclusion de jour of the neos.

The Host chides both Davids: “Because there’s no existential threat like the Soviets, there’s no one credo like ‘Containment & Deterrence.’ So a quasi-Doctrine of keep-our-powder-dry, emphasize diplomacy/alliances and maintain situational flexibility is no bumper sticker but smart since each case is different. If anyone can do better than we’ll use force to protect our “core interests” and in situations that “stain the conscience” (Rwanda, Kosovo), please come forward. It turned out to be a bad thing to announce beforehand our explicit line in Korea because it may have coaxed the Chinese to invade.

Basically, O is saying he’s not W, which may be a negative definition but it’s one that’s understandable after we invaded the wrong country post-9/11. Why would anyone still give an audience to neo-cons like Cheney/Rumsfeld/Wolfowitz/Kristol since they are as credible as ‘lost causists’ still arguing 150 years later they were right about the Civil War?

The panel then applies Obama’s West Point specifically to Afghanistan and the Ukraine.

Frum rips him apart for announcing a departure date a successful surge so that now “all our effort there accomplished nothing.” Corn minds listeners about Vietnam and Iraq and that if a president inherits a failing war, it’s foolish to conclude in-for-a-penny, in-for-a-pound and keep going for 10-20 years to justify earlier sacrifices.

There’s agreement, however, that Putin’s withdrawal of Russian troops from the Ukranian border and the election of billionaire Petro Poroshenko appear to have defused that crisis, though pro-Russian separatists are still attacking Ukrainian forces in several eastern cities. Frum talks about his two recent trips there and how impressed he was that the Ukrainian people basically didn’t take Putin’s bait and start a civil war. He’s upset that Americans don’t seem interested in what’s happening there “since it profoundly affects the future of Europe and the future of Russia.”

Corn lauds Obama’s restraint in the Ukraine contrary to the war whoops of McCain & Graham. “The best way to avoid fighting a new cold war is to avoid starting one.”

On VA Scandal & The Koch Brothers Neither David disagrees that a VA clogged with new veterans with new injuries and that doctors records not patients had to be shaken up. The problem took a decade to develop but Obama did the smart thing by getting General Shinseki to resign and cleaning house.

As for Your Week, Corn explains that he closeted himself last weekend to read his Mother Jones colleague Dan Shulman’s important book The Sons of Wichita, a non-fiction account of the Koch brothers “which has the dynastic drama of a Dallas!”

Mark Green is the creator and host of Both Sides Now.

You can follow him on Twitter @markjgreen

Send all comments to Bothsidesradio.com, where you can also listen to prior shows.

Both Sides Now is available
Sat. 5-6 PM EST From Lifestyle TalkRadio Network
& Sun. 8-9 AM EST from Business RadioTalk Network.

Until recently, I was one of those people who refused to believe that Michael Jackson was really dead. I know, I know, I’m probably crazy, but look, I grew up on the guy’s music, OK?

Read more…

Windows Phone users worried that Whatsapp’s devs might be enjoying their Facebook money too much to fix the app can now rest easy. Whatsapp is now back on the Windows Phone Store after a couple of weeks’ absence, and it even comes with new features,…