Why Your Business Needs an Email List — and How to Get Started

Do you have an email list for your business? I don’t just mean a list of customers who’ve bought something from you in the past, but a list of people who’ve opted-in to receive regular newsletters, special offers, or other updates from you.

If not (or if your email list isn’t growing), then you need to make it a priority.

Email is definitely not dead, and while it may not seem as exciting as the latest, greatest social network, it’s a tried-and-tested way to draw in prospects, turn them into customers, and get them to buy from you again and again.

If you focus all your efforts on building a huge Facebook following, you’re going to be limited by the constraints of Facebook itself. Even worse, a large number of your fans won’t see your updates, due to Facebook’s algorithms (and due to the sheer number of other updates they’ll be getting).

There’s also the danger that if you rely on a social network, the network itself could have a huge change of policy, start to dwindle in membership, or even cut you off from your audience (perhaps as a result of a malicious complaint, or simple error).

Your email list, though, gives you full control over what you send, and instant access to inboxes. By simply signing up for your emails, your prospect is indicating that they trust you. Although not everyone will read every single email you send them (we all get busy!), most people are much more likely to read their emails than to read every update that comes their way on Facebook, Twitter, or LinkedIn.

Why Your Customer Database Isn’t Enough

By now, I’ve hopefully convinced you that an email list is a good thing. You might be thinking, though, that you already have a perfectly functional one: a list of customers’ email addresses, probably provided through your website or shopping cart.

While that’s better than nothing, it’s not a proper marketing tool. Here’s why:

  • You’ll only be able to email customers, rather than prospects. A true email list allows anyone interested to sign up.
  • In most cases, you’ll be severely limited in terms of what you can send. Perhaps the software only allows you to send plain text, for instance.
  • Your emails may not even get through. Major email list providers, like Aweber and MailChimp (I’ll come onto those in a moment) have agreements with the main ISPs so that they can ensure your emails don’t get falsely rooted out as spam — before they ever get to the intended recipient.
  • You may get complaints, or even fall foul of anti-spam laws. Customers may not want to receive emails from you, and you’ll need to carefully ensure that those who don’t want to can opt out when placing their order (and at any future stage).

So, how do you go about setting up the right type of email list, in the right way?

How to Set Up (or Improve) Your Email List

Step #1: Decide What Software You’ll Use

There are plenty of email list providers out there; some of the most popular are Aweber, MailChimp, Constant Contact and Get Response. For small businesses on a limited budget, Aweber and MailChimp are great options. (MailChimp is free up to 2,000 email subscribers.)

There are plenty of online reviews and comparisons of these different services, so set aside 30 minutes to do some research into which is likely to suit your needs best.

Step #2: Set Up Your Email List

Different email list solutions will have slightly different methods for this, but with each, you’ll need to set up a specific list. That includes setting up the welcome messages that all new members receive — such as a prompt to double-opt-in, and a message to let them know that they’re fully added to the list.

Here’s the start of the process in Aweber:

setting up your awebber list

The email software will provide you with a sign-up form that you can place on your website (e.g. on your About page and in your sidebar) — this is how members join. Alternatively, you can use a tool like OptinMonster to design and place forms with greater functionality.

You may want to consider sending an autoresponder sequence to new members. An autoresponder goes out at set intervals, based on when an individual joins. For instance, you might have a welcome message on Day One, some useful tips and hints related to your industry on Day Four, and a special offer on Day Seven.

Step #3: Make Joining Easy and Attractive

One big reason why companies struggle to get new people onto their email list is because they don’t make the process easy enough. It’s crucial that you have your sign-up form in multiple places on your website: don’t just tuck it away in the sidebar and expect people to find it.

I recommend you place it:

  • At the top of your sidebar (this is common practice, and it’s where people will look for the sign-up).
  • On your About page (for many sites, this is one of the most-visited pages).
  • In your footer, at the bottom of your page or blog post (if someone’s made it that far, they’re already engaged with your content).
  • On a special, separate landing page that focuses on getting people to join the list (this allows you to give more information about the email list, and you can promote this page on social media and in guest posts).

You can even have it directly beneath your header and navigation, like this example from Social Media Examiner:

Signup page for SME

It’s also a great idea to create a valuable incentive to offer people when they join your email list. Depending on your industry, this might be a one-off significant discount on your product(s), a free ebook or fact sheet, or almost anything you can come up with that your prospects and customers genuinely want.

What next step will you take to get your email list up and running, or to improve and grow your existing list? Leave a comment below to share your plans.

Chicago's Manufacturing Institute and Benefit Corporations: Aligning Stakeholder Interests

Chicago’s digital manufacturing institute overseen by the Defense Department aims to build the next gen factory for U.S. manufacturing. The idea behind these national manufacturing institutes is to aggregate money and resources to shorten the time and cost to bring advanced research to market, thereby gaining competitive advantage. Modeled after a German research network, Chicago’s public-private endeavor outraised the other three U.S. manufacturing institutes and has access to a super-computer to run prototypes and simulations at speeds and in numbers not previously possible for participants. Four more manufacturing competitions are underway, and legislative support is sought for a nationwide network of at least 15 more.

Chicago’s institute is about integrating the supply chain — having the right data in the right place at the right time, to make the right part in the right place, and doing it all for less. This means asking participants to align stakeholder interests for common economic good. That falls in the wheelhouse of benefit corporations and offers opportunities for collaboration.

Benefit corporations are not commonly thought of as building blocks for the for-profit sector. To the extent they are known, they often are associated with non-profit or low-profit social enterprises providing products or services to impoverished communities. Chicago has its share of such needs, and benefit corporations can elect this type of public benefit purpose.

But benefit corporations’ role as building blocks for the new economy has greater significance in this author’s opinion. Their public benefit purposes can focus on high-tech innovation for common economic good in the broader community — the goal of Chicago’s manufacturing institute. Delaware, for example, which is the home of American corporate law, authorizes benefit corporations of an economic, educational, environmental, medical, scientific or technological nature (among other categories).

Let’s be very clear that benefit corporations — regardless of the community they serve — are for-profit entities, with the rigor that involves. They embody accepted business principles and are taxed the same as traditional corporations. They are responsible, sustainable and have a positive impact on society. They aim to build better businesses that generate common good — something that should garner broad support in the wake of the recession. In fact, benefit corporations have elicited largely bipartisan support in the 23 states, including Delaware and Illinois, and the District of Columbia, which have adopted authorizing statutes.

The primary difference between benefit corporations and traditional corporations goes back to aligning stakeholder interests, the digital institute’s core challenge. Benefit corp directors can consider stakeholder interests in addition to those of shareholders. Directors are legally protected from lawsuits by third parties who might otherwise consider themselves beneficiaries of the business’s public purposes — leaving it to owners to insure the business stays true to mission.

Participants do come to the table in Chicago incentivized by defense budget initiatives to both achieve savings and transition from ground wars to cyber threats. But they have countervailing concerns arising from genuine business issues such as liability or intellectual property, or, more simply, inertia. Media reports participants like Boeing struggling with supply chain issues and being criticized when they try to reach agreements with suppliers to lower costs. Yet there also are positive stories about Boeing’s partnering with a Seattle nonprofit to manufacture aircraft parts using hard-to-place workers, so obstacles are not insurmountable.

The value of including benefit corporations in the innovation mix is that they have what participants in the digital institute are looking for: they come to the table predisposed by structure and MO to integrate innovation and stakeholder interests for the common good. Benefit corps can brainstorm operational experiences and partner with lab participants to meet supply chain needs.

The Midwest already has benefit corporations operating at this level. Solberg Manufacturing, Inc., for example, was one of Illinois’ first statutory benefit corporations and already works with Rolls-Royce. Founded in 1966 and headquartered in Itasca, Solberg has developed a global presence in standard and custom filtration, separation, and silencing products that protect machinery, the environment and the workplace. It prides itself on state-of-the-art facilities, excellent customer service, innovation and sustainable responsibility. No Solberg employees lost jobs during the recession.

Benefit corporations hold lessons for participants in Chicago’s initiative, and contributing to such innovation projects can move the conversation about them to a new level.

World's 15 Best Waterfront Cities

In most large cities around the world, waterways are the norm, not the exception–but some places capitalize on their location more than others. These 15 cities all have unique personalities centered around their waterfronts, where visitors can stroll along bustling harbors, sample the catch of the day, and climb to the city’s best vantage points to take in panoramic views of the water. From the winding canals and historic grandeur of Venice, to the seaside splendor of Cape Town, here are our picks for the world’s best waterfront cities.

by Emily Wasserman

More from fodors.com:
Fodor’s Approved: 2014’s Best Summer Weekend Bags
World’s 10 Best Beach Cities
10 Budget-Friendly Summer Trips for 2014

Future of Learning: Educational Reforms in India via Technology

Recently, there has been uproar about modifying a three year degree program to a four year one in India. There were arguments for and against the introduction of a four year undergraduate program. While the four year college education would help students who aspire to go abroad for higher studies, the same would mean a disaster for students from a lower middle class section of the society, who want to quickly graduate and join the workforce.

Being brought up in India and having studied in the Indian education system, I believe that our higher secondary education and undergraduate programs are quite rigorous and they prepare students well to compete internationally. However, research, technology and life skill training are not strong points of our current (undergraduate/graduate) education system.

It would be a highly desirable move if the Indian education system decides to incorporate basic research training modules, technology and life skill training sessions in the curriculum. Also, investing in online learning management systems, databases and other resources can greatly benefit the above cause. Developing a MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) platform and providing some free MOOC education modules to students can be a major game changer in the field of Indian education system. Giving students full degree credit for completing MOOC courses can solve the three or four year degree dilemma.

The future of learning is fast changing, especially with the help of technology. With proper infrastructure, trained teachers and technology, access to quality education in every corner of India can become a possibility. Though it is a complex task, educational reform can begin when the following requirements are in order:

  • Qualified teachers: Attracting and retaining top teaching talent is the key to solid and quality education. Unfortunately, the current pay structure, privileges and standard of living provided to a teacher are not very impressive. Regardless, most teachers invest because of their passion towards the field of education. Serious consideration must be given to attract brightest minds in academia.
  • Major overhaul of learning resources, facilities and infrastructure.
  • Fixing student teacher ratio in classrooms.
  • Designing curriculum keeping the current industry standards and requirements in mind.
  • Creating educational options that are flexible and can adapt with the changing times.

In the end, I would like to say that education reform should be such that it enhances student experience, gives them a robust standing wherever they may be, and open a variety of career avenues for them to choose from. From a faculty standpoint it should be such that it adds value, vigor and excitement in the life of the teachers. Finally, the expectation of the nation from an educational reform would mean — well educated/informed citizens who are tolerant of one another, can comprehend the vastness of knowledge, understand and apply logic, innovate ideas that can start or sustain industries for job creation and become stalwarts for upcoming generations.

What Made the Rebbe Judaism's Greatest Contemporary Leader

Twenty years ago this Tuesday I awoke early in Oxford because I was taking a non-Jewish student President of our L’Chaim Society named Cory Booker to Israel for the first time. I was packed and getting dressed when the phone rang. It was my father calling from Jerusalem.

“I don’t think you’re coming to Israel today,” he said. “Why not?” I asked.

“Israel radio just announced the passing of the Lubavitcher Rebbe.” The irony of hearing the shocking loss of a father figure from my actual father was not lost on me, but I had no time to mourn. I dashed to Heathrow airport to try and make the funeral in New York.

Luckily, I was already packed. I called Cory, who would later become my own Senator in New Jersey, and said, “Cory, the Rebbe just died. I can’t go to Israel with you. But I’ll arrange for someone to escort you,” which I did. Knowing my close relationship with the Rebbe, he understood.

The airline miraculously had a Jewish check-in clerk who somehow got me and about 30 other Chabad Rabbis on a flight that would get us into New York on time. It was a miserable flight with so many memories passing through my mind. Arriving at JFK amid a steady downpour, I dashed to Crown Heights and made my way into the Rebbe’s office where I saw the Rebbe cloaked in a prayer shawl. Governor Mario Cuomo was there looking somber, his head bowed. Few cried and noone spoke. Downstairs in the Rebbe’s synagogue thousands were dancing in the belief that this passing was a stage in the Rebbe’s revelation as Messiah. The celebration sickened me and I went back upstairs where they took the Rebbe’s body out in the wooden remains of his prayer stand. A wall of sound hit me, almost knocking me over, the cry of 20,000 women wailing upon seeing the Rebbe in the makeshift coffin.

I ran behind the body, losing my hat, tearing my suit, and struggling not to be trampled. The pushing became so dangerous that they put the Rebbe in an ambulance and slowly began to drive. I ran alongside, increasing my speed as they accelerated and sprinted until I could run no longer. It was only then that, as I stopped gasping for air, I began to cry. If the Rebbe were still alive he would have kept me running. But who would inspire me now?

Approximately 50,000 people attended the funeral, far smaller than other great Rabbis, like Moshe Feinstein, who had died just a few years earlier and it was mostly Chabad who attended.

The twentieth anniversary of the Rebbe’s passing is being accompanied by the portrayal of the Rebbe as the founder of Judaism with a smile. He was vastly popular, opened more Jewish educational centers than any Jewish leader in history, and helped to turn the tide of assimilation after the devastating losses of the holocaust.

But this is not the whole story and it sanitizes the Rebbe’s legacy. In truth, the Rebbe was a revolutionary. His Judaism was warm but it was also controversial and intentionally divisive. The Rebbe forced you to take a stand. He played on your conscience and made you choose. Would you practice a convenient Judaism that focused only on your own spiritual development or would you turn your personal home into a communal center, inviting in the less observant and neglected? Would you practice Judaism in private or would you be identifiably Jewish, with a kippah, in the street? Would you make peace with the world’s flaws or would you clamor for a Messianic, more perfect world?

Chabad today is mainstream and, as such, has lost some of its revolutionary ardor. It is inconvenient to rock the boat when you are the boat. Hence, we hear little today about the Rebbe’s intractable opposition on territorial concessions in Israel. Gone are the Rebbe’s battle cry that Israel’s retreat would embolden its enemies and invite further attack. We hear little about the Rebbe’s insistence that Judaism had a message for non-Jews amid its call for a universal ethical covenant.

When I made Cory the President of the L’Chaim Society at Oxford University and included thousands of non-Jewish members at our activities, it famously cost me my job as head of Chabad at Oxford. Today, of course, various Chabad Rabbis to whom I introduced Cory compete to publicly proclaim their influence on the Senator and their inclusion at our prayers at the Rebbe’s grave. But outreach to non-Jews who are not public officials remains highly controversial.

And we hear little about the Rebbe’s constant discussion about Messianism — not his personal candidacy for Messiahship, which he found vulgar and strongly rejected — but in people being fed-up with a flawed, murderous, evil world and demanding better from God. The Rebbe’s thundering cry to G-d — always done in public where he proclaimed “Ad Mosai-How much longer?” — objecting to the Creator allowing the indiscriminate murder of Jews in terror attacks, has today been replaced with a silent, religious resignation where God is always just, even as the long-promised Messiah still tarries.

Today the Rebbe is popular. But his funeral told a more honest story. He never pursued popularity and there were many who boycotted his message. He never feared controversy. It was influence, rather than numbers, that mattered. His mission was to make Jews uncomfortable with a materially driven life and he never intended for his movement to simply open centers the world over so that Jews could get kosher meals on vacation in the Caribbean or doing business in the Far East.

That Chabad can provide these essential amenities, thereby ensuring Jewish observance in the most remote places, is vital, but of secondary importance. The Chabad House’s principal purpose is to spread the influence of the Torah and make the Jewish people a light unto the nations.

The Rebbe loved all Jews and he loved all people. He despised the squandering of human potential and demanded even more of his followers when they believed they had nothing left to give. He always sought to be inspirational but was prepared to be an irritant.

At the end of the Bible Moses ascends to his burial at Mt. Nebo — unknown to us till this day — alone by God’s command. There was none to say the kaddish for him, none to offer a eulogy, no honor guard and no twenty-one gun salute. His legacy was not of the popular leader who was lauded by the people but rather the law-giver who pushed his people to aspire to holiness, often against their will.

The Rebbe, who followed in Moses’ footsteps as one of the great Jewish leaders of all time courageously trailblazed the same lonely path. Will we run alongside him?

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach is founder of This World: The Values Network, the foremost organization influencing politics, media, and the culture with Jewish values. He has just published Kosher Lust: Love is Not the Answer. Follow him on Twitter @RabbiShmuley.

Hobby Lobby Hobbyists Lobby To Pursue Hobbies Elsewhere

After the Supreme Court ruled on Monday that Hobby Lobby should not be required to provide certain forms of contraception to its employees, it was only a matter of time before people took to the company’s Facebook page to express outrage.

There were those calling for a Hobby Lobby boycott.

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

And those who promised their future business to Michaels Stores, one of Hobby Lobby’s competitors.

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

There were those who took issue with the religious ramifications of the decision.

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs =
d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js =
d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src =
“//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’,
‘facebook-jssdk’));
<div class="fb-post"
data-href=”https://www.facebook.com/HobbyLobby/posts/10152525945826425″
data-width=”466″>

<a
href=”https://www.facebook.com/HobbyLobby/posts/10152525945826425″>Post
by Jake
Vermaelen
.

And those who posed solid rhetorical questions.

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

And legitimately funny suggestions.

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

But not everyone disapproved of the decision.

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

As for Hobby Lobby, the company responded to critics and supporters alike.

hobby lobby response

hobby lobby negative response

And emphasized that it will still offer some forms of contraception.

suzy popsuzy pop response

An email to Hobby Lobby seeking comment on the Facebook posts was not immediately returned.

Teens React To Jonah Hill Using Homophobic Slur

When someone uses an anti-gay slur, does it mean they’re homophobic?

In this video from The Fine Brothers, a group of teens weighed in on this debate by reacting to the videos of Jonah Hill hurling the word “f****t” at a TMZ reporter and subsequently apologizing on “The Tonight Show” with Jimmy Fallon.

What is most interesting about the teens’ responses is the disparity between them. On one end, some believed Hill’s words were out of line.

“[His words were] definitely offensive to the LBGT community,” said Rachel, 18.

Others were more forgiving.

“I don’t see it is a huge deal. It’s someone responding from being hurt,” said Shant, 18.

But Michael, 15, did not not see anger as an excuse.

“I think if you say something, whether you’re angry or not, it still means something in you, somewhere,” he said.

Jeannie, 19, argued Hill’s words were acceptable because of how often they’re used.

“No [it’s not bad],” she said. “Like, ‘suck my d**k, f****t!’ Everyone says that.”

Despite their varied opinions, the teens did agree on one thing: their own experience with homophobic language; and often, being the target of it.

“[I’ve had homophobic slurs used toward me] all the time by my friends,” said Alix 18. “But we don’t take it seriously towards each other.”

Michael, 15, evoked sports as a place ridden with homophobic language.

“Yeah, it happens,” he said. “Especially on the football field. That happens a lot.”

Overall, the teens’ responses provide a fascinating — and diverse — commentary on this controversial issue. Filmmaker Benny Fine agrees in an email to The Huffington Post:

“It’s insightful watching teenagers who are surrounded by this kind of language every day,” he said. “We really dove deep to see what they thought — and how language can be hurtful. A controversial topic, but important to be discussing.”

It certainly is. So, let’s keep the discussion going.

4 Things I Wish I'd Known When I was Parenting Toddlers the First Time Around

This is my crew. My first two are 18 months apart, my second two are 21 months apart. Right now, I’m raising my second round of toddlers. As I’m chasing my current little ones, I often think back to the first time I did this — balancing one on a public potty while holding the other away from the toilet with one arm; scanning a playground for two little heads at all times; the exhausted ,whiney late afternoon hours; the intense bedtime routines; the way I was forever searching for sippy cups and helping with shoes; the fight for my lap during storytime. Nurturing little ones close in age is an intense experience. And — thanks be to God — I get to do it all again.

Throughout my day, I often imagine what I would tell myself if I could go back in time. I think about who I was back then — that mom of two tiny boys who never stopped moving and hardly ever ate, who loved her life deeply, but was plagued with a few insecurities that turned out to be irrelevant. If I could, there are a couple of things I would tell her. Such as:

1. It really is this hard. You’re not doing anything wrong.
With my older two, I spent a lot of time thinking about how to make the difficult parts of parenting easier. Why were my children so rambunctious? Why did I keep losing their sandals/ sippy cups/sun hats/tiny toys? What could I do to get my kids to be calmer and more obedient? How could I get them to leave the park without tantrums or stay in their rooms during rest time? I was constantly evaluating and strategizing. Surely if it was this hard, I must be doing something wrong. There had to be a way to make life easier.

If I could go back, I would say, relax. Tantrums, running away, accidents, lost belongings, mischievous nap times… it’s all a normal part of toddler life. I wasn’t making life harder than necessary. Raising two toddlers really is just that hard.

2. Accept your kids’ personalities now.
The first time around I had one cautious introvert and one thrill-seeking extrovert. I can’t begin to imagine how much mental energy I devoted to trying to make my introvert more outgoing, and my daredevil more cautious. I can’t tell you how many times I scolded one for exploring a new area too enthusiastically, while encouraging the other to get out and explore.

Five years later, I have one cautious introvert and one thrill-seeking extrovert. All of that energy did nothing but frustrate us all. The time I put into worrying whether one “should” be so intent on taking risks or the other “should” be having more fun at birthday parties, did not change who they actually are in any way.

Our children are given to us with their own innate personalities. We can’t make shy kids love crowds, and we can’t make thrill-seekers settle down. We just can’t. I didn’t fully accept my kids’ personalities until a year or so ago, and it has completely changed my relationships with them. These days I have one toddler for whom all of life is a PARTY! and one who observes life from behind my leg. Only this time, I am encouraging both to be exactly who they are. Who am I to tell my EXCITED! kid to focus, or to tell my hesitant kid he needs to go and explore?

Like every mother, I want to see all of my kids grow into happy, fully functioning people. But now I am now convinced that endeavor can only begin when I accept who they naturally are.

3. Eventually, parenting works.
Now that they’re a little older, I see the fruit of our labor in my big kids’ lives. Back then, my husband and I put our energy into teaching teamwork, creating solid bedtime routines, nurturing a love for stories and eating healthy foods (though in general food is not a battle in our house). We now have big kids who work together (mostly), go to bed (mostly), love to read and have at least a basic understanding of what kinds of foods nourish their bodies. But we do not, for example, have kids who pick up after themselves, because it was never our top priority. Family life is never going to be perfect. But the areas most important to us really do take root in our kids, eventually.

This is so encouraging for me, both in my new round of teaching toddlers to go to bed and in my new task of teaching big kids the next level of expectation. Knowing they are good at bedtime because I was so serious about it back then helps me to be more consistent with things like chores and finishing schoolwork now. All that hard work really does pay off.

4. I know, I know, I KNOW how hard it is to believe this, but this season will end.
Everyone tells you to enjoy the little years because they go by fast. It doesn’t feel very fast, does it? It feels as though you will wipe bottoms and dice food until the end of time. But it really will end. There actually will be a day when the babies you can’t let out of your sight can do their own thing for hours, and you can trust they are not in the medicine cabinet.

Knowing the season is temporary is double-edged. On one hand, the toddler years are beautiful, full of life and energy and curiosity and fun. I sometimes miss that sweet season the big boys and I shared. On the other hand, I know now we have a lot of life ahead of us. Those cute babies are going to morph into actual people, with their own sense of humor and passions and struggles and friendships and life. I love the toddler years. I really do. But with my second set of toddlers, rather than wishing I could freeze time, I often look at my babies and think, just you wait. In a few years we’re going to have so much fun, kid.

President Obama: Our Future, Your Legacy

Just a year ago, many LGBTQ people were waiting for the Supreme Court decision on the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and of Proposition 8, California’s statewide ban on same-sex marriage. Rallies and parties happened all across the country when it was announced that same-sex couples in California were allowed to marry and that federal rights would be granted to all legally married same-sex couples. Since then, we have seen a slew of state and federal courts reaffirming the right of all loving couples to marry. Last week, President Obama announced that he will sign a much-anticipated executive order to protect LGBTQ workers from employment discrimination at companies that have contracts with the federal government. It would seem that things are looking up for the LGBTQ community.

However, most issues of inequality for LGBTQ folks have not seen the light of the day. Even with extremely broad and dangerous religious exemptions, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) has been stalled in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives after its passage in the Senate. Other issues like housing, public accommodations, and homelessness have barely even been mentioned. As matter of fact, most LGBTQ people and our allies don’t know that in most states people can be denied services just because they are or are perceived to be LGBTQ. We can get evicted from our homes because of our sexual orientation or gender identity. We can get fired from our jobs because of who we are or whom we love.

This is why 40 percent of all homeless youth identify as LGBTQ — our community is kicked out of our homes and onto the streets at dramatically disproportionate rates. Nearly 90 percent of transgender people face harassment at work, and same-sex African-American couples are twice as likely to live under the poverty line than their heterosexual counterparts. Just last month, a gay couple was kicked out of a Texas restaurant, and Catholic teachers in Ohio are being forced to sign a contract outlining that they can’t support LGBTQ rights in their private lives.

Today is the last day of Pride Month. While some LGBTQ people spent their weekend at parades and a few LGBTQ leaders are attending a cocktail party at the White House, our community continues to suffer — often invisibly. Although it is important for LGBTQ people to take the time to celebrate our progress, we can’t forget that our rights will not be won over cocktails. It’s our duty to pass on a world to the next generation that’s better than the one we inherited. As LGBTQ people we don’t have a choice — we need to fight to survive and thrive in a country in which laws don’t protect us.

Without question, we are facing an ever-present crisis — and President Obama has the opportunity to solidify his legacy by creating a clear vision for full federal LGBTQ equality.

We are calling on President Obama to take yet another historic step towards the liberation of LGBTQ people and to reaffirm his place in the halls of history. As we approach midterm elections and as he approaches the second half of his second term in office, we need him more than ever to show leadership by creating a clear vision for full LGBTQ equality under the law. LGBTQ people in too many places in the United States live under the overwhelming weight of oppression. When our states deny us life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, we have no other choice but to turn to our federal government. The fight for LGBTQ equality doesn’t begin on June 1st and end on June 30th — it will not end until we’re fully equal under the law. It will not end until our humanity is respected. This is a fight to save the very soul of our country. It’s our collective work to build a more perfect nation.

The question is, will President Obama seize the opportunity to usher in a new day for LGBTQ Americans, or will he cling to the conventional politics that say we will fall in line without more than crumbs of equality? We’ll be outside the White House on this last day of Pride Month, calling for more and hoping that President Obama hears that call.

Ukraine's Cease-Fire Expires

KIEV, Ukraine (AP) — Separatist rebels have not handed back border posts, laid down their weapons or fulfilled other conditions, Ukraine’s president said Monday in a phone call with the leaders of Russia, Germany and France.

The call between President Petro Poroshenko, Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel and France’s Francois Hollande took place before a deadline expired for Ukraine’s shaky, unilateral cease-fire. Poroshenko had already extended the cease-fire from seven days to 10 as part of a plan to end the conflict that has killed more than 400 people since April. The cease-fire has been continuously broken, however, and the pro-Russia rebels have not disarmed as Poroshenko has demanded.

As the deadline passed, there was no immediate action by the president to extend the cease-fire.

European leaders have urged Russia to use its influence with the rebels to de-escalate the conflict and warned that they could impose another round of economic sanctions against Russia if conditions for continuing the cease-fire were not met.

Those included a demand that the separatists hand back three checkpoints they seized on the border with Russia.

French officials said Monday’s phone call touched on establishing a full cease-fire by both sides, having international monitors on the border between Russia and Ukraine, freeing prisoners and holding substantial talks with the rebels.

Rebel leader Alexander Borodai on Monday welcomed having observers monitor the situation anywhere in the separatist region but rejected the demand to hand back the checkpoints.

Stymied by the rebels’ refusal, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Putin suggested to Poroshenko that both Ukrainian monitors and observers from the Organization for the Security and Cooperation in Europe deploy to checkpoints on the Russian side of the border to ensure “they aren’t used for illegal means.”

“We expect that direct and detailed consultations between Russian and Ukrainian border guards will start shortly to agree on details of the monitors’ presence,” Lavrov said in televised remarks.

A Kremlin statement said foreign ministers from the four countries would quickly hold four-way talks to discuss the issues raised by the leaders — a distinct cold shoulder to further efforts from the United States or the full European Union to be involved in Ukraine’s protracted crisis.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the U.S. welcomes encouraging words from Putin but is looking for the Russian leader to take “tangible actions” rather than just issue positive sentiments to avoid additional sanctions.

“We are still in a situation where those actions do not indicate a seriousness of purpose when it comes to deescalating the situation in Ukraine,” Earnest said. “That’s what leaves Russia at risk of further (sanctions).”

Sporadic fighting flared early Monday despite the cease-fire. Shelling killed at least two people and ruined several apartments in the rebel-held city of Slovyansk.

Poroshenko says his unilateral cease-fire is a first step to give rebels a chance to lay down their arms. Further steps would include an amnesty for separatists who have not committed serious crimes, early local elections and changes in the constitution to decentralize power to Ukraine’s regions.

But in Slovyansk, shooting kept up through the night, growing heavy at times Monday morning. Some of the shelling appeared to be directed at rebel front-line positions but other shells landed in a residential neighborhood, destroying or damaging several buildings.

One woman, 62-year-old Vera Sayenko, died when a shell hit her ninth floor apartment, neighbors told an AP journalist.

“Everything we have collected in our life is destroyed. We have become poor,” said Valery, whose apartment was also destroyed. He would not give his last name. “Show all Ukrainians what happened here. What else do they want, to ruin the town and kill people?”

Ukrainian police and prosecutors were also investigating the death of a Russian cameraman working for Russia’s Channel One. Anatoly Klyan, 68, was fatally wounded late Sunday when a bus carrying journalists and soldiers’ mothers was hit by gunfire as it approached a military base in eastern Ukraine after dark.

Klyan was the fifth journalist to die since the fighting began in April.

The conflict in eastern Ukraine began after a protest movement among those seeking closer ties with the EU prompted President Viktor Yanukovych to flee in February. Calling it an illegal coup, Russia seized and annexed Ukraine’s Crimea region in March. The insurrection in the Russian-speaking east began shortly afterward.

Last week, Ukraine signed a trade and political deal with the EU — the one that Yanukovych had rejected.

___

Szlanko reported from Slovyansk, Ukraine. Lynn Berry and Vladimir Isachenkov in Moscow, Elaine Ganley in Paris and Josh Lederman in Washington contributed to this report.