Skip Bayless and Stephen A. Smith Should Say They Were Wrong About Gregg Popovich

I love ESPN’s show First Take. Watching Skip Bayless and Stephen A. Smith debate and sometimes holler at each other about sports and other stuff is one of the best parts of my mornings. In addition to being consistently entertaining and insightful they are also hilarious. And it would be a crime not to mention the show’s moderator, the lovely Cari Champion, who makes the hard job of keeping Skip and Stephen A. on topic look easy.

But despite how much I love the show, I must admit that I have a nagging bone to pick with Mr. Bayless and Mr. Smith.

Longtime viewers of the show will know that while the rest of the universe has almost uniformly labeled San Antonio Spurs Coach Gregg Popovich the best coach in the National Basketball League, Skip and Stephen A. have defiantly declared Doc Rivers to be the best. However, since the Spurs systematic dismantling of Lebron James and the Miami Heat in this year’s NBA finals, it appears Skip and Stephen A. may be covertly trying to change their tune about who’s the top coach in the league.

I was shocked last week when Skip and Stephen A. decided to discuss whether Popovich was the greatest coach in NBA history in reaction to NBA legend Jerry West saying that “Popovich is the best coach [he’s] ever seen.” This took me by total surprise. I thought to myself, “Surely Skip and Stephen A. aren’t trying to pull the oki dok on us and change their opinion on the sly.” After spending multiple years extolling Doc Rivers as the best coach in the league, now suddenly they want to engage in a serious conversation about whether Popovich is the best ever. Seriously gentlemen, did you think we wouldn’t notice?

Well, we did notice and I think some explanation is due.

In fairness, neither Skip nor Stephen A. agreed with Jerry West’s view that Pop was the best ever. However, they did agree that he was among the top five greatest ever, and they went on to say that probably only Larry Brown, Red Auerbach and Phil Jackson were in front of him. Which leaves me asking the question, so what happened to Doc Rivers? I thought he was supposed to be a better coach than Popovich?

I think the answer to the mystery is obvious. Skip Bayless and Stephen A. Smith were very wrong about this and their integrity as high-profile, respected sports journalists should compel them to say so.

The fact is ever since the venerable zen master Phil Jackson retired in 2011, Skip and Stephen A. have touted to the high heavens that Doc Rivers is the NBA’s best coach. And it has blown my mind that two men who in part make a living disagreeing with one another have consistently been able to agree on something that is so incorrect.

Now, don’t get me wrong, I think Doc Rivers is a great basketball coach. I was living in Orlando when he took over a less than stellar 1999-2000 Magic team that had just traded four of its five previous season starters; and what he accomplished with that team was a minor miracle that rightfully earned him Coach of the Year honors. Then several years later I watched with admiration as Doc used the “Ubuntu” philosophy of South Africa to help inspire his 2008 Boston Celtics team to win an NBA championship. And this past season we all watched as he masterfully navigated the organizational turmoil surrounding infamous Clippers owner Donald Sterling.

Without question, Doc Rivers is a bona fide “leader of men” as Stephen A. Smith would say. But the fact is even though Doc is really good; he’s just not the best. That’s a distinction reserved for the NBA’s longest tenured head coach Gregg Popovich.

As the saying goes, “the numbers don’t lie.” And when it comes to the numbers, Gregg Popovich is a legend. Since Coach Pop took control of the Spurs in 1996 he has put together one of the most impressive coaching careers the NBA has ever seen. He’s led his Spurs to five NBA championships — and only two coaches in NBA history have won more. He’s ranked third in league history in most postseason wins. He has a nearly a 70 percent overall winning percentage. He is also one of only three coaches to win the NBA Coach of the Year honors three times. And he’s the only coach to go 15 straight seasons winning 50 games or more.

I say again, the numbers don’t lie.

The numbers are so definitive that one could make a case that Coach Pop is not the only the best coach in professional basketball, but he’s also one of the greatest coaches in the history of team sports. In fact, when Sports News magazine published a ranking of the 50 greatest coaches in the history of sports, based on the opinions of 118 Hall of Famers, championship coaches, and other experts, they ranked Coach Pop 49th on their list. Not bad for a guy that Stephen A. and Skip thought until recently was not even the best coach in today’s NBA.

For all these reasons it boggles the mind why Skip and Stephen A. have been so wrong about this. I can only surmise that they like many others in the media they fell victim to Doc’s intoxicating charm. Everybody knows he’s a media darling and the favorite coach of many NBA players.

Whatever the case, Skip and Stephen A. seem to have now changed their minds about who’s the best coach and I’m glad about it. But I really wish they would just admit it. Does not journalistic integrity require it? To Stephen A.’s credit, after game four of this year’s NBA finals, he did state that “we can say that Gregg Popovich is the best coach in the NBA.” I guess this was his way of saying he and Skip were wrong. But after three years of adamantly denying Pop’s clear status as the best coach, we need more than a mere acknowledgment from Stephen A. and Skip Bayless, we need a retraction. It’s just the right thing to do.

Broadway Producers, Fran Kirmser And Tony Ponturo, Acquire Rights To Joe Louis' Life Story

NEW YORK (AP) — Watch out, “Rocky” — the producing team behind some recent sport-related Broadway shows have just gotten the rights to tell the story of boxing great Joe Louis.

Fran Kirmser and her producing partner Tony Ponturo said Wednesday that they’ve acquired the exclusive global, theatrical and movie rights to Louis’ life story. If they turn it into a stage story, Ponturo and Kirmser will have their fourth sports-related play since 2010. Louis’ life certainly has plenty of fodder for a dramatic retelling, especially his rise to becoming arguably the world’s finest heavyweight champion and his decades of conflict with the Internal Revenue Service over millions in back taxes and interest. It would be the latest boxing-related show in New York following the musical “Rocky,” based on Sylvester Stallone’s film.

Louis’ history is highlighted by his two fights with Max Schmeling, the German champion whose victory in their first bout was hailed by Adolf Hitler. Louis demolished Schmeling in their rematch on June 22, 1938.

After Louis claimed the heavyweight title in 1937, he held it for more than 11 years, making 25 defenses to set a record unlikely to be broken. Louis’ influence in both boxing and race relations has been immense. He died in 1981.

Ponturo and Kirmser have a long history with mining the theatricality in sports stories. Their “Lombardi,” about the Green Bay Packers coach Vince Lombardi, turned into a modest hit, but 2012’s “Magic/Bird,” about the friendship between basketball legends Earvin “Magic” Johnson and Larry Bird, didn’t do as well, closing after only 37 shows. The third — a look at the New York Yankees called “Bronx Bombers” — lasted less than a month this year.

Kirmser and Ponturo will serve as executive producers of Legendary Pictures’ feature film version of their “Lombardi.”

___

Mark Kennedy can be reached at http://twitter.com/KennedyTwits

'Straight White Boys Texting' Is The Tumblr Of Our Time

The surprise explicit text: a peril of the modern dating world.

You swipe right with someone cute on Tinder. You’re chatting away about normal things, like puppies and what you do for work. When suddenly, out of nowhere:

sext 1

This phenomenon, known colloquially as “straight white boy texting syndrome,” led one Tumblr user to compile submitted screenshots of the worst offenders in one hilarious, gross place. Enter “Straight White Boys Texting.”

The blog’s FAQ page explains: “The name of this blog is based off of the phenomenon of the ‘straight white boy text’ aka asking ‘hey what’s your bra size ;)’ in the middle of a conversation, or things like ‘what would you do if you were here haha lol ;)'”

Of course, non-white straight men send ridiculous texts too — and their “contributions” are welcome on the site. Check out some of the most hilarious attempts at seduction below, and check out the Tumblr for more.

tinder

***

tinder

***

sext

***

tinder

***

tinder

Craig Bowen And Jake Miller Become Indiana's First Gay Couple To Marry (VIDEO, PHOTO)

Craig Bowen and Jake Miller made history when they became Indiana’s first gay couple to tie the knot after the state’s same-sex marriage ban was struck down June 25.

Bowen and Miller, who have been together for eight years, told the Indy Star that they planned to celebrate the union with a champagne toast after the ceremony.

“Our parents don’t know yet, so they might be a little mad at us,” Miller said, according to the publication. “I sent Craig a text and said, ‘Hey, do you want to get married today?'”

WISH-TV reporter Jim Shella also tweeted a photo of the happy couple:

H/T Towleroad

What Happened AFTER The Avengers Had Shawarma

Seriously, who doesn’t try shawarma until they’re in their 40s?

Charlie Rangel Defeats Adriano Espaillat In New York Democratic Primary For Congress

Rep. Charlie Rangel defeated state Sen. Adriano Espaillat in the New York Democratic primary for U.S. Congress.

Rangel, who also faced off against Harlem minister Rev. Michael Walrond Jr. in the primary, previously said he was confident he’d defeat Espaillat, who he defeated in the 2012 Democratic primary by fewer than 1,000 votes.

Rangel, a member of Congress since 1971, failed to nab the New York Times’ endorsement, but was backed by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and former President Bill Clinton. The times also chose not to endorse Rangel in 2010 and 2012.

Had he won both the primary and the general election in November, Espaillat could have been the first Dominican-born member of Congress. As HuffPost’s Amanda Terkel and Samantha Lachman reported earlier, Espaillat had been hitting Rangel over his pro-corporate votes, calling him “a friend of Wall Street and not a friend of 116th Street or 181st Street.”

Follow Live: Ecuador vs. France

Follow live: Ecuador vs. France.

Why I'm Breaking up With Busy

Rory Uphold is the creative groove behind HelLA, a smart, witty web series about living on planet LA. A friend zapped me one of her videos, “Pretentious Hollywood.” Two friends run into each other on the street and the small talk revolves around — what else — but a grocery list chock-full of busy. Volunteering at a downtown women’s shelter, working with inner-city youth, organizing a 5K and taking in a disabled dog from a rescue shelter — the actress’ earnest delivery is dead-on, which is part of what makes the simple premise so funny and so sad. We all have people like this in our lives, and some of us ARE those people: knee-deep in the addiction to busy.

Busy has replaced the luxury car, the sprawling home or the designer handbag as the status symbol of the moment. Really, if you’re not running car pool, cooking a dinner for your best gal pals, chairing the library renovation committee, keeping up with Pilates and building a school in Africa, then you’re doing it wrong. At least that’s what we tell ourselves and anyone else within earshot. The telling of the busyness, the exhausting mouth relay we sustain to reassure our self-importance is almost more important than the doing of the things that keep us so damn busy.

After tumbling out of grad school, I landed a job at a small, private college teaching as well as acting as the assistant director for their new women’s leadership center. Busy snuck up on me and latched itself onto my ankle, python-style. Fewer than a hundred emails in my inbox felt weird. One day, my brother asked, “Who do you have lunch with?” And I stared at him. “What do you mean?” I said. “No one. I’m too busy working and catching up on things to grab lunch with other people.” Ick. Gross.

Women are among the most ardent devotees to the culture of busy. The fourth or sixth wave feminism perks have finally kicked in with a resounding YES to having/doing/being it all ricocheting around America. Why not get credit for it? Science and socio-economics have gifted many middle-class, educated women with time and opportunity, but neither of these things are theirs to waste. Instead, the race is on to prove that you’re worthy of this legacy, that you’re not about to “lean out” any time soon, you couldn’t possibly even if you wanted because, hey, way too busy.

There’s no honor in busy, there’s no reward; there’s only kinesis eroding the now, pushing us further away from the shore of here. It’s turned us into walking news tickers. Busy is the worst kind of drug, filling us with an inflated sense of ourselves, stealing moments from us because who has the time to sit on the back patio on a summer’s evening doing nothing in particular but letting night creep in around you? What’s wrong with you? Weak. Lame.

I’m as guilty as anyone else in feeling the pinch of pressure to, literally, keep up with the Joneses. I admit to rising to the bait of competition in tallying up my activities against someone else’s life and work. I accepted this as the new normal. One day I was on the phone with a friend listening to her recite the litany of errands, responsibilities, tasks and obligations she had been fulfilling that day. I felt like I was drowning in the eddy of her busy wake. What no one tells you is that some of life’s biggest revolutions unfold in quiet, dark pockets of ordinary moments. The desire to chime in with my own laundry list of stuff disappeared, vanishing into the ozone like a cartoon genie. Nope o’clock, I thought.

And so it was that I simply decided I was over busy. Yes, just like that, like waking up one day committed to vegetarianism, like finally getting algebra, like the moment you know you love your person. “No thank you, please,” I said, cribbing the firm politeness of my 4-year-old nephew.

I refuse to feel guilty about the time I spend or how I spend it. I want to cradle time, not chase it away. I want to survey my day and think about what I did, not what got done. I won’t apologize for doing nothing on any given evening. I won’t be made to feel less than because of the way I invest or choose not to invest my energies. So, sorry busy, I’m out, and we are never getting back together.

Justin Amash's Primary Opponent Calls Him 'Al Qaeda's Best Friend'

A Republican is characterizing the libertarian-leaning Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) as “Al Qaeda’s best friend” in a new television ad because Amash voted to shut down the detention center at Guantanamo Bay and advocated ending the National Security Agency’s blanket collection of phone records.

Businessman Brian Ellis, who is hoping to unseat Amash in Michigan’s Aug. 5 primary, unveiled the ad Wednesday. It quotes Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), who made the Al Qaeda comments about Amash in an interview with Politico in May.

Nunes also told Politico that Amash isn’t a “serious member of Congress,” and called him “someone here playing games, and trying to be on the opposite side of Republicans,” to justify the contributions he’s made to Ellis’ campaign.

“I will vote to keep terrorists locked up in Guantanamo Bay, allow American intelligence to monitor foreign terrorists plotting attacks, and support our veterans who sacrifice so much,” Ellis said in a statement accompanying the ad’s release. “Justin Amash’s votes to close Guantanamo Bay and stop monitoring foreign terrorists are dangerous and his votes against our veterans are shameful.”

Given Ellis and Nunes’ criteria, Al Qaeda has many close friends in Congress: 93 other Republicans voted with Amash on his amendment to end the bulk collection of phone records.

Ellis has his work cut out for him in Michigan’s 3rd District. Recent polling shows Amash ahead by a wide margin, so the television ad represents a bid to shift attention to Amash’s voting record.

Amash has support from the conservative Club for Growth and FreedomWorks, while Ellis has the backing of Michigan’s Chamber of Commerce and the state’s farm bureau.

"Risky Business" Stands out in Growing Sea of Climate Reports

This blog post was co-authored by Jonathan Camuzeaux and published on EDF Voices.

Put Republican Hank Paulson, Independent Mike Bloomberg, and Democrat Tom Steyer together, and out comes one of the more unusual — and unusually impactful — climate reports.

This year alone has seen a couple of IPCC tomes, an entry by the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the most recent U.S. National Climate Assessment.

The latest, Risky Business, stands apart for a number of reasons, and it’s timely with the nation debating proposed, first-ever limits on greenhouse gas emissions from nearly 500 power plants.

Tri-partisan coalition tackles climate change

The report is significant, first, because we have a tri-partisan group spanning George W. Bush’s treasury secretary Paulson, former mayor of New York Bloomberg, and environmentalist investor Steyer — all joining forces to get a message through.

That list of names alone should make one sit up and listen.

Last time a similar coalition came together was in the dog days of 2009, when Senators Lindsay Graham, Joe Lieberman, and John Kerry were drafting the to-date last viable (and ultimately unsuccessful) Senate climate bill.

Global warming is hitting home

Next, Risky Business is important because it shows how climate change is hitting home. No real surprise there for anyone paying attention to globally rising temperatures, but the full report goes into much more granular details than most, focusing on impacts at county, state and regional levels.

Risky Business employs the latest econometric techniques to come up with numbers that should surprise even the most hardened climate hawks and wake up those still untouched by reality. Crop yield losses, for example, could go as high as 50 to 70 percent (!) in some Midwestern and Southern states, absent agricultural adaptation.

The report is also replete with references to heat strokes, sky-rocketing electricity demand for air conditioning, and major losses from damages to properties up and down our ever-receding coast lines.

Not precisely uplifting material, yet this report does a better job than most in laying it all out.

Financial markets can teach us a climate lesson

Finally, and perhaps most significantly, Risky Business gets the framing exactly right: Climate change is replete with deep-seated risks and uncertainties.

In spite of all that we know about the science, there’s lots more that we don’t. And none of that means that climate change isn’t bad. As the report makes clear, what we don’t know could potentially be much worse.

Climate change, in the end, is all about risk management.

Few are better equipped to face up to that reality than the trio spearheading the effort; Paulson, Bloomberg and Steyer have made their careers (and fortunes) in the financial sector. In fact, as United States Treasury secretary between 2006 and 2009, Paulson was perhaps closest of anyone to the latest, global example of what happens when risks get ignored.

We cannot — must not — ignore risk when it comes to something as global as global warming. After all, for climate, much like for financial markets, it’s not over ’til the fat tail zings.