Time for California to Set a Fair Standard for Minimum Wage Pay

I’m heartened to see national attention on the challenges facing working women and men. For example, Monday’s national Working Families Summit addressed how hard it is for women and families to make ends meet, while national and local battles are fueling a critical conversation about the need to raise the minimum wage. It’s about time. Today’s federal minimum wage feeds poverty and income inequality because today’s federal minimum wage is worth less than it was in 1968. According to T. William Lester, assistant professor at UNC, if the federal minimum wage of $7.35 had kept pace with inflation, it would now be worth about $10.77.

California is ahead of many other states because last year, Governor Brown signed AB 10 (Alejo), which increased the state minimum wage. Yes, that was a step in the right direction, but don’t forget that California is one of the most expensive states in our country. As of July 1, California’s minimum wage will go from $8/hour to $9/hour. And by 2016, that wage will be $10. But here’s the thing: inflation. We all know inflation erodes our purchasing power. Because of inflation, in 2016, that $10/hour minimum wage will only be worth $9.32 in 2013 dollars. AB 10 will never move families of three or four above the federal poverty line. We’re going backwards. But we don’t have to.

On Wednesday, June 25, the Assembly Labor and Employment committee will discuss SB 935 (Leno), which proposes to do two things — gradually raise the minimum wage to $13/hour by 2017, AND index the minimum wage to inflation. This trailblazing bill is very important because it will actually lift families out of poverty. If SB 935 goes into effect, by 2015, families of three will be earning 127 percent of the federal poverty level. And by 2017, SB 935 could lift hundreds of thousands of Californians out of poverty as well as allow workers and employers the predictability offered by small but reliable raises. In addition, indexing the minimum wage to inflation means that we won’t have to keep going back to legislators to ask for increases to the minimum wage. In one fell swoop, we can do something that will help break the cycle of poverty for generations.

When I think of why it’s so critical that we act now, I think of people like Jessica from Carlsbad, who has two children that she’s raising alone because of a divorce. She’s working for minimum wage, and unfortunately, $8.00/hour isn’t cutting it — and $9/hour won’t either. She ends up having to make hard decisions between necessities like groceries and medical care. Although Jessica and her family are working hard, they’re making poverty wages. It wasn’t always this way. Minimum wage jobs used to be enough to support a family. That’s because the thinking behind the minimum wage was that it should be enough for people who work full-time to earn enough to make ends meet.

Raising the minimum wage does more than simply increase the incomes of families like Jessica’s. It has a powerful health effect. Raising the minimum wage to $13 by 2017 would result in 7.5 million Californians experiencing less chronic disease; less hunger, smoking and obesity; and lower rates of depression and bipolar illness. In fact, it would prevent the premature deaths of 389 lower-income Californians each year.

The ripple effect of raising the minimum wage goes beyond individuals and families. It benefits our state — in real dollars and cents. Because people will earn more, they will pay higher taxes. SB 935 will raise the incomes of 5 million Californians who will in turn pump $23.5 billion in additional income into our state economy each year, testified Lester to a California Senate Labor and Industrial Relations Committee. Plus increasing California’s minimum wage from $8 dollars to $13 dollars would reduce enrollment in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly the food stamps program, by an estimated 740,000 to 891,000 people. This would allow policymakers to reinvest in other critical areas such as education and safety net programs, like subsidized childcare — which help low-wage workers stay in the workforce.

To be sure, there’s opposition to raising the minimum wage in California. A lot of it is coming from organizations like the National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB), and the California Chamber of Commerce which have called the bill a job killer. But that is an overly simplistic perspective. Studies show that there has been almost no job loss with an increase in the minimum wage. Furthermore, research shows that employers benefit from a higher minimum wage because it reduces employee turnover and strengthens worker productivity. Turnover is expensive. According to the US Department of Labor, it costs one-third of a new hire’s annual salary to replace her or him. For an $8/hour employee, that’s more than $5,000. Companies such as Costco (which pays its workers on average more than double the current minimum wage) show that having a higher base salary translates directly into increased employee retention and higher levels of productivity.

Ultimately, raising the minimum wage to $13/hour by 2017 and indexing the minimum wage to inflation sets a fair wage standard that will help families to do more than live paycheck to paycheck, and help our nation reduce inequality. It will show that Californians believe that people who work hard should make enough money to both enjoy their lives and provide for their children to do even better. So let’s join together and encourage our legislature to vote for a minimum wage that helps us build a California that works for all.

Kate Kelly's Excommunication Is A Warning To All Activists In Mormon Church, Experts Say

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — The decision by the Mormon church to excommunicate the founder of a prominent women’s group marks a stern statement at a time when the church is under pressure to recognize gay rights and allow women into the priesthood.

Experts believe the move essentially draws a line in the sand to show church members how far they can go in publicly questioning church practices. The ousting of Kate Kelly is rare and brings down the harshest punishment available on a church member who created an organization and staged demonstrations in a push to permit women to join the faith’s lay clergy.

“It does more than excommunicate Kelly,” said Jan Shipps, a retired religion professor from Indiana who is a non-Mormon expert on the church. “It warns everybody.”

Shipps said The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is implementing “boundary maintenance,” using Kelly as an example to show people how far they can go in questioning church practices.

The message seems to be that “organizing pressure groups, and trying to cultivate a following for such groups, crosses a line that will trigger disciplinary action,” said Armand Mauss, a retired professor of sociology and religious studies at Washington State University.

Church officials had no immediate comment Monday.

Kelly’s former church leaders in Virginia notified her by email after holding a disciplinary hearing Sunday. They found her guilty of apostasy, defined as repeated and public advocacy of positions that oppose church teachings.

Kelly’s group, Ordain Women, announced the decision Monday and released excerpts from the letter she received.

Church leaders said she can no longer wear Mormon temple garments, hold positions in church or give talks during services, among other things. After one year, they will consider allowing her back, but only if she displays “true repentance” and shows she has “stopped teachings and actions that undermine the church, its leaders, and the doctrine of the priesthood,” the letter says.

Kelly wasn’t immediately available for comment but called the decision “exceptionally painful” and a “tragic day” for her family in an emailed statement.

She didn’t attend the disciplinary hearing Sunday, instead holding a vigil in Salt Lake City with about 200 supporters. She spoke about the possibility of not being able to fully practice the religion she has been part of since birth.

“I’m just not sure that there is something you can do to prepare yourself for a shunning like that,” she said.

Excommunication is not common in the Mormon faith, reserved usually for cases where members violate the religion’s moral code by having affairs, being charged criminally or committing sexual abuse, said Patrick Mason, chairman of the religion department and professor of Mormon studies at Claremont Graduate University in California. Church members being kicked out for apostasy is quite rare, he said.

Nobody has solid numbers on how many church members are ousted each year, but it is probably between 10,000 and 20,000, a fraction of the 15 million members worldwide, said Matt Martinich, a church member who analyzes membership numbers with the nonprofit Cumorah Foundation.

Debra Jenson, a spokeswoman for Ordain Women, said the group is saddened but will continue to advocate. Kelly also plans to be part of the movement and work for gender equality in the church.

Kelly was one of two well-known Mormons facing excommunication. John Dehlin, an outspoken advocate for gays and the creator of a website that provides a forum for church members questioning their faith, has a meeting with a church leader in Logan on June 29 to discuss his case.

Scholars say they are the most high-profile examples of excommunication proceedings since 1993. That year, the church disciplined six Mormon writers who questioned church doctrine, ousting five and kicking out a sixth temporarily.

Mormon officials haven’t discussed Kelly’s case specifically. They have said they are open to questions and sincere conversations about the faith but that some members’ actions “contradict church doctrine and lead others astray.”

The church doesn’t usually discipline people who question or disagree with church doctrine or practices — thousands express such views online every day, Mason said. But the church seemed to take umbrage with the way Kelly created a movement and courted media coverage for her demonstrations, the professor said.

“It’s not about policing thoughts, it’s more about public expressions and public movements,” Mason said.

Kelly said she stands behind everything she has done since forming Ordain Women in 2013.

Women can hold many leadership positions in church but aren’t allowed to be bishops of congregations or regional presidents of stakes, which are made up of a dozen congregations, known as wards. The church’s highest leaders, called the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, are also all men. The church says only men serve in the lay clergy as prescribed in “the pattern set by the Savior when it comes to priesthood ordination.”

___

Follow Brady McCombs at https://twitter.com/BradyMcCombs and Michelle L. Price at https://twitter.com/michellelprice

5 No-Brainer Ways To Save Money Now

Experts share laid-back ways to rein in spending without feeling the pinch.

By Joann Pan

@media only screen and (min-width : 500px) {.ethanmobile { display: none; }}

Like Us On Facebook |
Follow Us On Twitter

The Exhausting Fight to Save My Home after the Financial Crisis

The financial crisis hit many of us brutally hard — me, me, me, and me! Of all the challenges I’ve dealt with, saving my home has been the most difficult. I worked so tirelessly, and ambitiously, overcoming a tyrant of a boss and a male dominated industry to buy it. But I did it! I had a beautiful three bedroom home, two car garage, and over three bathrooms to keep me company on cold and lonely Jersey City nights. But unfortunately, times changed.

The economy took a nose dive, and my personal life seemed to enjoy its fate of following the downward economic turn very closely. The fact is, all companies that were too big to fail (and didn’t flop) got a bailout — and yes, I am glad our entire financial system did not collapse. But they got a bailout and the average American got the middle finger. No one ever tells you it’s okay to stop paying your mortgage or to fight for a better deal. No one taught me that. The only thing I knew is when I called Bank of America I didn’t get any definitive information. I got diddly squat.

I remember someone telling me, “you can’t even pursue a loan modification until you stop paying your mortgage.” Wait, what?! But, that was not who I was! I was a good girl with a 720 credit score. I paid all of my bills on time. When I found my back up against the wall, it was my only choice to stop paying the bank. I couldn’t sell because properties had started to foreclose and drag the values downward, I was between tenants (would faith bring a miracle?), and after years of flailing I didn’t have the money to cover my misjudgments. I know, after years of betting on the wrong horse I should have known, but I had so much faith in my positive visualization techniques! And I assure you, I am not joking.

I finally stopped paying my mortgage and I had no idea how or if things would work out. Would I lose the only asset I had left and had worked so diligently to acquire and pay for all those years? I got lucky — maybe the vision board did work — and a longtime friend of mine in California, the other side of the nation away from my home in New Jersey, referred me to a company in Massachusetts called HSI Trust – HomeSavers, a non-profit consumer advocacy organization (aka HSI).

It took a while — more than four months — to finally get them to commit to my cause, but once they did I knew I had a real ally in my corner. Where many were screwed (to use a polite term) when the economic crisis hit and charged thousands for a loan modification that never materialized, HSI was charging a very reasonable and affordable monthly fee and showing me solid results. They worked liked dogs (I would get calls at 9pm their time on a Friday, and they wouldn’t rush off the phone!). They understood what I was going through, they weren’t judgmental, and when I needed a calming voice, they provided it.

I remember waking up to a holiday weekend, a time when all you want to do is have fun, and reading an email from my tenant asking if my property would be foreclosed on. I was mortified, sickened, worried, and uncertain. The perceived good reputation I thought I had earned in New Jersey would be destroyed when Sheriffs I used to hire for security at parties would now be serving my tenants foreclosure notices. And of course I was concerned for my tenant who was paying their rent! Would they be escorted out in a week by the local law enforcement? I answered their email immediately and honestly, letting them know that I had no intentions of foreclosure and was pursuing a loan modification with the help of a qualified consultant. Sadly I doubted my own words. Time and time again, everyone would remind me how the odds were against me and it was after all, “just a house.”

After that incident, I frantically emailed Bruce Boguslav of HSI. Bruce’s calming voice would arrive on the phone and effectively say, “Don’t worry, calm down, just ignore them, we will take care of the bank.” And yet another time we spoke he told me of other people who won their fight, received a loan modification and did not lose their homes – those who were willing to fight to the end.

My property is currently a rental home and I did receive a loan modification last year. I began paying the bank every month just like old times. But every now and again, I receive a letter from the bank’s ‘foreclosure prevention department’ and I feel my nerves fraying all over again. I have the luxury to sell at some point soon. I don’t live there and I actually — shockingly — have equity. I have the pleasant option to sell a home I no longer live in and to continue to rent in Los Angeles.

A woman with a home and no children is one thing. A man with a family that lives in the home is another. I am not saying it has been easy and it has taken its psychological toll on me and other single women (don’t get me started on single mothers). But there is an undeniable cultural pressure on a man to provide and to protect his family. To do otherwise is to feel a failure in the most profound way.

Ailton Lima, a Brazilian Immigrant turned American citizen and business owner said it best: “The thought of losing your home is particularly tough. It challenges everything you got, including your manhood. You feel like you’re letting your family down. You’re not doing your job of protecting your family. You’re worthless. How could you do that? Never mind the recession. It’s your fault.”

Growing up, everyone tells you how to play by the rules. But if you’re like me, no one tells you how to break the rules successfully. The world had always been black and white, and now there was this huge gray area I needed to learn how to maneuver. Fighting for my home was emotionally draining and very stressful, but I know now that it is possible because it happened to me, and I want every red-blooded American homeowner to know that there is hope if you are willing to fight for yourself.

Mila Kunis Really Hated Doing This Interview With The Star-Ledger

The Star-Ledger recently had the opportunity to speak with Mila Kunis, and it did not go well. Interviewer Stephen Whitty describes the 25-minute phone call as “a pretty bumpy ride,” and essentially turns the piece (which presumably might have functioned as a profile) into a review of the interview, noting that Kunis says things “coldly” leaving her “seeming brusque or bored.”

Of course, the Kunis that we know and love is spontaneous and charming (see: that time she went on Radio 1 and was fun / generally delightful).

However, this Star-Ledger interview — reminiscent of a similarly un-fun Selena Gomez interview conducted by The Toronto Star back in July of 2013 — did not carry that charming persona. It includes Kunis refusing to answer the question “How are you feeling?” or talk about how she got into acting.

Yet, in Kunis’ defense, there is a version of this story in which Whitty was the one being not-so-charming (or “seeming brusque,” as he might say). At the very least, she appears to sense a prying attitude, replying to the question of her acting origin, saying, “There was nothing else to it. I don’t know if that’s the answer you’re fishing for.”

Also, he blames her attitude on seeing the word “vagina” in a Gawker headline about her unflattering Marie Claire profile … and on her being pregnant. “Hell,” he writes toward the end of the piece. “Maybe she just picked up the phone after an awful bout of morning sickness (not that I’d risk offending her by asking).”

Maybe they were both dealing with an awful bout of morning sickness. It’s impossible to say, really. In any case, you can read the disaster in its entirety here.

Hanging Book Rack: Hang ‘Em and Read ‘Em

Bookworms will be pleased to know that there’s another way to store and display books aside from shelves. In addition to furniture that incorporates space where you can arrange your books (like the Sunflower Chair), there are installations like the Hanging Book Rack that lets you do it with more flair.

Hanging Book Rack 620x480magnify

As the name indicates, it’s a book rack in the unconventional sense because it doesn’t have shelves where you’re supposed to arrange your books. Instead, it looks like a coat rack, with its wooden plates and all. At the bottom of these plates are waxed cotton strings that hold the books in place, and they function as a bookmark, at the same time, too.

Hanging Book Rack1 620x540magnify

To account for varying book thickness, the wooden plates can be moved from left to right to make sure everything fits. The Hanging Book rack can fit up to twelve books, and that should be more than enough for your Book of the Month reads.

hanging book rack 3 620x332magnify

The Hanging Book Rack is available online for $210(USD) from OldandCold’s Etsy shop. A mini version that can fit six books is available for $110.

[via Green Head]

Samsung Galaxy Tab S Review: Beautiful Screens Make These Tablets Magic For Movies

IMG_9883 Samsung has never made a tablet that truly got my blood pumping, but that might’ve just changed. I bought an original Galaxy Tab when it was first released, only to find the experience frustrating and return it a few days later because of a dropped Wi-Fi issue. Now, Samsung has a new line of tablets called the Galaxy Tab S, and though there have been many different Samsung slates… Read More

Second Round Of R/GA Techstars IoT-Focused Accelerator Announced

Screenshot 2014-06-24 08.50.14 Based on the actions of Google alone (not to mention other big players in the tech world), it’s incredibly clear that the home is likely one of the next platforms to likely be dominated by tech. That said, R/GA is announcing their second iteration of the R/GA Techstars accelerator, focused exclusively on connected devices and hardware. Last year, Techstars and R/GA partnered for the… Read More

This Perching Robot Could Point To The Future Of Flying Drones

flickr-6228844874-hd What do you do when your drone runs out of power? At this point in the quadcopter game, flying drones need to return to base to recharge or risk falling out of the sky. However, a new method for “tapping” power lines has been discussed, which would allow the drones to sit on and steal power from overhead lines and then keep flying when they’ve recharged. Read More

Want This New Invention? A Never Ending Slinky

Never Ending Slinky MachineIt seems that just about everyone in the United States has owned a Slinky at one time or another. The mesmerizing toy has been around for decades and has entertained generations of young and the young at heart. The main problem with the Slinky was finding a staircase long enough to really be able to indulge in watching the metal spring “walk” its way downstairs. One company is seeking funding on Kickstarter to sell “A Never-Ending Slinky Machine” to keep those springs walking.