Here's How Older Generations Are Ruining the Workplace

I achieved what many would consider impossible. If not impossible, most would say it was unlikely.

I was a college dropout, yet I was able to earn high profile positions with some of the biggest businesses in their industry, earning more than twice that of my peers in my age group. All seemed good initially. However, there was trouble in paradise. Thanks to the economy, budget cuts and company-wide layoffs, I had three different jobs in three years. I left each company on good terms, but I left with a bad taste in my mouth.

I was smarter than every manager I ever had. I mean no disrespect, and by me saying I was smarter, I’m not implying that they were dumb or incompetent. However, I had a track record of proven success in my field. That was the reason they hired me over the countless others who were competing for my position. I went into each job thinking about the value I could provide and how excited I was to work with veterans. I hoped to learn the ropes, better understand the company politics and dynamics. In return, I would provide my much needed expertise in digital marketing. This was experience my managers completely lacked, because they were older and used to traditional marketing. SEO, SEM, PPC and social media were completely unfamiliar territory.

As I would settle into my role, I would notice that after a month a look and sense of overwhelming fear and panic would come across the face and body expressions of my managers. In group settings, conference calls and team meetings it would begin. I would say something brilliant that many in the room would agree with, and then I’d quickly be silenced by my manager.

My manager would take the “stage” and begin spewing off a bunch of nonsense that he/she and everyone else around us knew was proverbial B.S. I would then sit there blank-eyed wondering why I was not allowed to have a seat at the table. Why was I not able to contribute?

Here’s how older generations are ruining the workplace.

Gen Xers and Baby Boomers come to a workplace now filled with people that are in the same age range of their children. As such, they tend to take on a condescending, elitist attitude as if these “kids” couldn’t possibly know more than them. At the same time, in the back of their mind, they know that in many respects these kids know tremendously more than them.

In the business world, Millennials are in many ways better suited to lead than their older counterparts. Why? The reason is simple. Millennials value authenticity. They know that shoving a boring, self-serving advertisement down the consumers’ throats won’t work, so they’re better suited to tell it like it is and find business solutions and marketing positions that consumers are more likely to digest.

Move aside Don Draper. Your days are done.

When older generations bring their 1985 skill-set into the workplace, baggage comes along with it. They know that they are yesterday’s model and that the new fresh faces have valuable things to contribute. As a tactic of self-preservation, older generations intentionally keep their younger counterparts oppressed in hopes that they can slip under the radar and continue to pitch proverbial B.S. for another 10-20 years until they’re up for retirement.

I’ve got news for these people. They’re ruining the workplace for themselves and everyone around them, and they’re causing the world to progress slower. They’re destroying innovation and they’re destroying opportunity. They think they can hide, but eventually their time will be up and they won’t be able to stay hidden until retirement. They’ll be fired, re-org’d or replaced.

We need veterans and rookies to work together. That’s the only way a team will ever win, but this starts with all parties checking their egos at the door and coming into the office ready to roll up their sleeves and play in the same sandbox.

Michael Price is an entrepreneur and author of What Next? The Millennial’s Guide To Surviving and Thriving in the Real World. An advocate of ideas for radical change, he has received critical acclaim for his lessons in education, career, entrepreneurship, and personal finance.

Mayors Call On Congress To Tackle Illegal Immigration

By Lisa Maria Garza

DALLAS, June 22 (Reuters) – U.S. mayors on Sunday called for Congress to draw up bipartisan legislation to address a surge of illegal immigrants into the United States and asked for help to ease the resulting financial burden on local governments.

The U.S. Conference of Mayors said at their annual meeting in Dallas they are asking congressional Democrats and Republicans for legislation to increase border security and support city and state governments whose finances are being strained by costs associated to illegal immigration.

“Forget the D thing. Forget the R thing. This is an American issue,” said Anaheim Mayor Tom Tait, a Republican and co-chair of the Immigration Reform Task Force, a bipartisan group within the United States Conference of Mayors.

Since October, 52,000 unaccompanied children have arrived on the U.S. border with Mexico, the Department of Homeland Security said on Friday, underscoring an immigration problem seen by the White House as a humanitarian crisis.

The White House last week stepped up efforts to slow the flow of illegal children into the country, expanding the government’s ability to process and deport people and announcing new funding to boost security in crime-plagued Central American countries.

Republicans blame the influx of children on President Barack Obama’s 2012 decision to give temporary relief from deportation to some young people brought to the United States illegally by their parents.

The Obama administration’s push for U.S. immigration reform has stalled in Congress amid partisan bickering. (Writing by Jon Herskovitz; Editing by Paul Simao)

Israeli Military Carries Out Airstrikes In Syria

By JOSEF FEDERMAN, Associated Press

JERUSALEM (AP) — Israeli warplanes bombed a series of targets inside Syria early Monday, the Israeli military said, in response to a cross-border attack that killed an Israeli teenager the previous day.

In all, Israel said it struck nine military targets inside Syria, and “direct hits were confirmed.” The targets were located near the site of Sunday’s violence in the Golan Heights and included a regional military command center and unspecified “launching positions.” There was no immediate response from Syria.

In Sunday’s attack, an Israeli civilian vehicle was struck by forces in Syria as it drove in the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights. A teenage boy was killed and two other people were wounded in the first deadly incident along the volatile Israeli-Syrian front since Syria’s civil war erupted more than three years ago. The Israeli vehicle was delivering water as it was doing contract work for Israel’s Defense Ministry when it was struck.

“Yesterday’s attack was an unprovoked act of aggression against Israel, and a direct continuation to recent attacks that occurred in the area,” said Lt. Col. Peter Lerner, a military spokesman. He said the military “will not tolerate any attempt to breach Israel’s sovereignty and will act in order to safeguard the civilians of the state of Israel.”

The sudden burst of violence has added to the tense situation in Israel, where forces have spent the past week and half in a broad ground operation in the West Bank in search of three teenage boys believed to have been abducted by Hamas militants.

Israel has carefully monitored the fighting in Syria, but has generally kept its distance and avoided taking sides. On several occasions, mortar shells and other types of fire have landed on the Israeli side of the de facto border, drawing limited Israeli reprisals. Israel is also believed to have carried out several airstrikes on arms shipments it believed to be headed from Syria to Hezbollah militants in neighboring Lebanon.

It was not immediately clear whether Syrian troops or one of the many rebel groups battling the government carried out Sunday’s deadly attack in the Golan. But Lerner said it was clear that the attack was intentional. Israel has repeatedly said it holds the Syrian government responsible for any attacks emanating from its territory, regardless of who actually carries them out.

Israel captured the Golan Heights, a strategic plateau overlooking northern Israel, from Syria in the 1967 Mideast war. Israel’s annexation of the area has never been recognized internationally.

The incident occurred in the area of Tel Hazeka, near the Quneitra crossing. The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said Syrian troops had shelled nearby targets on the Syrian border earlier in the day.

Israeli police identified the boy as Mohammed Karaka, 14, of the Arab village of Arraba in northern Israel. Local media said he had accompanied his father, the truck driver, to work.

Late Sunday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he spoke to the boy’s father and sent his condolences. “Our enemies don’t differentiate between Jews and non-Jews, adults and children,” he told an international gathering of Jewish journalists.

In his address, Netanyahu said in conflicts like Syria, where al-Qaida-inspired extremists are battling Iranian-backed Syrian troops, there is no good choice and it is best for Israel to sit back and let its enemies weaken each other. “This is a fault line between civilization and savagery,” he said.

Tim Howard's Acrobatic Save Kept U.S. Alive Against Portugal (GIFs)

There is a reason that U.S. soccer fans proudly chant “We have Tim Howard.” The U.S. goalkeeper made an incredible diving save deep into the first half to deny Portugal a goal that would have doubled the deficit his team was facing.

With Portugal already leading 1-0 thanks to an early defensive miscue, Howard made a fingertip save on a shot from Eder in the 45th minute. Moments before that save, Portugal striker Nani, who scored the opener in the World Cup clash in the Amazon, banged a shot off the goalpost as Howard dove to his left. The ricochet came to Eder with Howard still getting up off the pitch. Eder’s right-footed shot seemed headed for the back of the net when Howard leapt up to make a stunning save with his right hand.

Nani's blast goes off the post and Tim Howard makes an u... on Twitpic(GIF via @FlyByKnite)
Share photos on twitter with Twitpic(GIF via @ddocket)

Jermaine Jones' Goal Was Sensational And Got The U.S. Even With Portugal (VIDEO)

Jermaine Jones added his name to the list of heroes that have emerged for U.S. Soccer at the 2014 World Cup.

With the United States trailing Portugal in the second half, Jones produced the equalizer with a stunning right-footed shot from outside the penalty area. The shot, coming after a U.S. corner kick, froze Portugal goalkeeper Beto as it blazed into the net at the far post in the 64th minute.

Christina Aguilera And Her Baby Belly Want To Help Keep Your Lips Healthy

Yup, even Christina Aguilera enjoys comfy clothes and some lip balm on a nice relaxing Saturday afternoon.

The on-and-off again “Voice” coach shared a photo of her growing baby belly with her Twitter followers on Saturday afternoon, relaxing in what appears to be her kitchen.

You've Come a Long Way, Hercules

The latest Hercules movie starring Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson features brawn on par with 300 and other similar action movies that highlight power and the male body. The Greco-Roman demi-God also has uniquely American pedigree with even Founding Fathers such as John Adams focusing on him. But the Hercules that John Adams lauded is not quite the same that movie executives have banked on today.

In John Adams’s day, Hercules was in fact not the most muscular man on the block. Such a physique symbolized excess, even danger — a sign of weakness, of sorts, at a time when manhood emphasized self-restraint and moderation. Even artists at this time depicted Hercules as less developed than he is today in popular culture.

Adams actually proposed the image of Hercules for the Great Seal of the United States. Adams served with Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin on a committee tasked with proposing a seal for the new nation. They worked with an artist and each put forth their own suggestions — none of which were accepted by the designer or the Congress. Adams’s committee gets credit for the motto “E Pluribus Unum” but the design of an eagle clutching arrows was produced by a later group.

In John Adams’ world, Hercules nonetheless symbolized power. Through the eighteenth century, the name Hercules was a favored one for ships. It was also used for male slaves perhaps to ironically underscore their degraded status.

But when Adams invoked Hercules, his idea of power was one of morality and virtue — he did so only using the particular story of “the Choice of Hercules.” The story focused narrowly on young Hercules’s confrontation with two women or goddesses, Virtue and Pleasure. Hercules must decide between taking the proper path for his life. Pleasure unsuccessfully attempted to seduce Hercules from the hard path of virtue. The story thus emphasized a moment in the life of young Hercules when he chose virtue and a moral path over a life of pleasure and indulgence.

For Adams, the “Choice of Hercules” captured the fortitude needed for the success of individual man but also of the United States, as a collective Republic of virtuous men.

For Adams, the choice of Hercules was fitting because it captured the central need of the nation — virtuous men who would choose a life of moral service over self-serving indulgences.

Writing to his wife, Abigail, in 1780, Adams also used the story of the “Choice of Hercules” to describe his assessment of life in Paris. For Adams, it was a place full of temptations and indulgences that individuals needed to resist, by following the model of Hercules.

We’re a long way from Adams’s embrace of Hercules as a man who chose the path of morality and self-service to today’s view of him as an action hero of extraordinary hunkiness — to be featured in muscle and fitness articles and magazines.

The objectification of women has long been criticized by the feminist movement but it may seem that in response, our culture moved toward also objectifying men (although not to the same degree) — rather than away from objectifying anyone.

You’ve come a long way, Hercules, and I suspect we all have a long way further to go.

Thomas A. Foster is the author of Sex and the Founding Fathers: The American Quest for a Relatable Past (Temple University Press)

The New Republic Expands Policy Coverage Online With Q.E.D.

NEW YORK — The New Republic will launch a domestic policy and politics vertical on Monday that Senior Editor Jonathan Cohn considers directly in line with the magazine’s century-old mission.

“I’d like to think if Walter Lippmann were transported in time to today, it’s what he would be doing,” Cohn, who will oversee the new vertical, said of the magazine’s co-founder. He noted that The New Republic has “always tried to be a part of the conversation about policy,” dating back its Progressive Era roots and early support for issues like the minimum wage.

Cohn said he and the two other primary writers for the vertical, Danny Vinik and Rebecca Leber, will offer reasoned arguments around issues like health care, the economy and climate change in the new section, which will be called Q.E.D. It will be found at NewRepublic.com, and Cohn and Co. also plan to produce a daily email newsletter.

Cohn’s Thursday post on Obamacare rate shock suggests what readers might expect from Q.E.D. While the media debate often resides in the extremes — success or failure — Cohn argued that “the truth is somewhere in between and the real argument, among those who follow the law closely, is whether the good stuff outweighs the bad stuff or vice versa.” Cohn walked readers through the issue with several charts based on a just-released survey.

Q.E.D. takes its name from an abbreviation for a Latin phrase that means “which was to be demonstrated” and is found at the end of mathematical proofs. Similar to proofs, Cohn said policy writers should show readers how they arrived at a given conclusion.

A 17-year veteran of The New Republic, Cohn has built a strong reputation in Washington for deep coverage of budgetary and social welfare issues. In 2007, he wrote a book on health care policy, Sick, and in recent years he has written extensively on the Affordable Care Act. (He’s been largely supportive.) While politically liberal, Cohn opts on television and Twitter toward civil, wonky debates over partisan food fights.

Cohn remarked on how much the policy news cycle has changed since his early days at the magazine. He recalled writing in the late 1990s on HMO regulation and having a week to meet a print deadline. Now, he said, readers “expect you to know what you’re talking about” in three hours.

Competition in the wonk world has only gotten hotter in recent months.

In January, Cohn wrote that “policy journalism is having its moment” after Ezra Klein, the founder of the Washington Post’s Wonkblog, left the publication to co-found Vox.com, a site focused more on explaining the news than breaking it. Nate Silver also launched his data-driven FiveThirtyEight site in March, and The New York Times responded to his departure with The Upshot a month later.

While Q.E.D. fits into journalism’s “wonk bubble,” it’s a small-scale operation when compared to high-profile launches like Vox and FiveThirtyEight, each of which boasts dozens of staffers.

Noah Chestnut, The New Republic’s director of labs, told The Huffington Post that Q.E.D. will add new features in the coming weeks to enhance the conversation between the writers, readers and other policy experts. Q.E.D., he said, will grow organically and innovate quickly based on reader engagement.

Cohn wouldn’t speculate as to how many posts can be expected daily. But given that Cohn used to publish one or two detailed posts a day on The Treatment, his old health care policy blog, it’s unlikely Q.E.D. writers will be churning out posts simply to generate content. Indeed, Cohn acknowledged that he’s “a big believer in quality over volume.”

U.S. Stunned By Last-Minute Portugal Goal In World Cup Thriller (VIDEOS/PHOTOS)

The United States is still alive in the Group of Death but hasn’t escaped yet.

In a thrilling group-stage clash that wasn’t decided until the final seconds, the U.S. team was on the verge of sealing a spot in the Round of 16 at the 2014 World Cup when Cristiano Ronaldo set up a game-tying goal for Portugal. The U.S. held a 2-1 lead into the final minute of stoppage time when Ronaldo blazed up the right wing and delivered a cross to Portugal’s Silvestre Varela in front of goal. In the 95th minute of play, the reserve midfielder headed past U.S. goalkeeper Tim Howard to earn Portugal a 2-2 tie at Arena Amazonia in Manaus on Sunday.

“Well, obviously, when you get it in the last second, it’s unfortunate,” U.S. coach Jurgen Klinsmann told ESPN’s Jeremy Schaap on the field after the draw. “But I think it was an amazing game, amazing performance by our guys. Nothing more you can ask for. We just go it the tougher way. We got to go and got to beat Germany, get a result against Germany. That’s what we’re going to do.”

After an early defensive miscue gifted Portugal the only goal of the first half, the U.S. side surged into the lead with two goals in the second half. In the 64th minute, U.S. midfielder Jermaine Jones scored an equalizer with a sensational strike from outside the Portugal penalty area. The right-footed shot, coming shortly after a U.S. corner kick, froze Portugal goalkeeper Beto and blazed into the net at the far post.

The U.S. comeback seemed complete in the 81st minute when captain Clint Dempsey scored his second goal in as many games in Brazil. The go-ahead goal was produced by yet another U.S. foray up the right. A cross from defender DeAndre Yedlin from the end line found its way through traffic in the Portugal penalty area to U.S. midfielder Graham Zusi. He passed to Dempsey directly in front of goal. The player who scored the fifth-fastest goal in World Cup history in the U.S. opener against Ghana then knocked the ball into the net.

Had the U.S. held on for the win it would have sealed a place in the Round of 16 and eliminated Portugal from contention. Portugal arrived in Manaus in desperate need of points from the match after suffering a 4-0 defeat to Germany. The draw ensured that all four teams in the group will be in contention heading into the final two games. The U.S. will face Germany on June 26 while Portugal faces Ghana. Both Germany and the U.S. can secure a place in the knockout stage with a win or a tie.

group g

“Obviously, we’re disappointed,” Dempsey told Schaap on the field. “But at the end of the day, you got to look at the positives. We got a point. We’re on four points now. It’s going to go down to the last game and hopefully we’ll get the job done.”

3 Reasons Why Entrepreneurship Can't Be Taught in the Classroom

I’ve been an entrepreneur for 10 years. I learned business the old-fashioned way through pure trial and error. I don’t believe that business can be taught any other way, and even if it could I don’t believe it could be as effective. Entrepreneurship is really hot right now. Twenty-five year olds are becoming millionaires overnight simply by developing apps. In this environment there’s no wonder why so many young people are becoming attracted to entrepreneurship. In typical college fashion, many universities are trying to exploit this trend by developing entrepreneurship courses and majors. This is total nonsense and here’s three reasons why.

1.) Can’t Manufacture Risk Takers
The biggest thing that separates entrepreneurs from employees is that entrepreneurs are risk-takers. You simply can’t manufacture risk-takers. The higher education system serves the purpose of manufacturing like-minded clones with the same attributes and mentalities. When I say clones, I’m not trying to be disrespectful, but I’m not sure there’s any other way to sugarcoat the truth. A clone by definition is a model that matches another with the same characteristics. Think about how detrimental it would be if entrepreneurs were all walking around with the same thought processes and approach to business. We’d never innovate. At the core of entrepreneurship is the idea of individualism. Individualism is not an attribute that is encouraged in the classroom setting and it never will be. It would force a learning environment with limited curriculum because in an environment that cultivates the growth of individuals, there’s no way to appropriately grade each individual student. Are you supposed to give one kid an “A” because his idea and business plan worked, but then you give another kid an “F” because theirs didn’t? This is why teaching entrepreneurship in the classroom makes no sense.

College by default is the average person’s Plan A and Plan B. Think about it. Even when young adults aren’t necessarily excited about going to college they’re pressured by their parents and they’re told, “you need to graduate from college so you have something to fall back on.” Entrepreneurs don’t look for things to fall back on and they’re not fond of Plan Bs. They go all in.

2.) Methodologies Will Be Outdated Before Graduation
Selling products and services is less about having the greatest quality or the best solution. It’s more about having distribution and the best marketing. Gaining distribution comes down to building relationships, pounding the pavement and closing deals, and marketing comes down to connecting with the consumer’s deepest emotional wants, needs and desires. In this day and age with mass media proving to be less and less effective, businesses that are doing well are utilizing alternative marketing methods. They’re building their email lists, social media following and they’re prioritizing their customer service experience. Since marketing continues to evolve at such a rapid pace the notion that you can learn how to market a business in a classroom is downright laughable. Before you graduate the game will have changed 10 times over. What you previously learned for four years will no longer be as effective or relevant. This is even true for distribution. Since the barriers to entry for an entrepreneur have become smaller and smaller, more and more companies are selling their products or services online. This allows entrepreneurs to cut out the retail middle man and sell direct to the consumer, so while you’re wasting your time in college learning models and theories; they’ll all be obsolete no matter what part of the entrepreneurial ladder they rest on.

3.) The World’s Most Prominent Entrepreneurs Studied in the Field
I could make a page-long list with the names of entrepreneurs that didn’t graduate from college or get a degree in entrepreneurship. I could also use these people as examples for why learning entrepreneurship in the classroom is unnecessary and nonsensical. Many would retort that that list doesn’t accurately reflect the full spectrum of entrepreneurs who are successful. We’d both be right. However, there’s something to be said about the fact that most of the world’s most successful entrepreneurs never studied entrepreneurship in the classroom. There’s also something to be concerned about when we try to manufacture entrepreneurs the way we manufacture employees. I believe it will destroy the allure and beauty of entrepreneurship.

What always drew me to entrepreneurship was the idea that I could pursue my dreams building a business and achieve success based purely on a good idea, providing something of value and busting my butt to bring it to the world. This entrepreneurial spirit keeps the playing field level, because at the core of entrepreneurship is the idea that anybody with an idea and the fortitude to push through can achieve success. This is why entrepreneurship can’t and shouldn’t be taught in the classroom, because the entrepreneurial environment of risk, change and individualism that makes entrepreneurs successful can’t be taught, it must be experienced in the field.

Michael Price is an entrepreneur and author of What Next? The Millennial’s Guide To Surviving and Thriving in the Real World. An advocate of ideas for radical change, he has received critical acclaim for his lessons in education, career, entrepreneurship, and personal finance.