Costa Rica Edges Greece In Penalty Shootout To Continue World Cup Dream Run (VIDEO)

There always seems to be enough time for heartbreak at the 2014 World Cup. Occasionally, there is enough time for two teams to have their hearts broken in the same game.

Costa Rica overcame a late equalizer from Greece in second-half stoppage time and ultimately prevailed 5-3 in penalty shootout in a Round of 16 clash at Arena Pernambuco in Recife on Sunday. The first seven players to step to the penalty spot in the shootout had all scored when Costa Rica goalkeeper Keylor Navas denied Greece striker Theofanis Gekas with a diving save. With a chance to send his team into the quarterfinals for the first time, Costa Rica defender Michael Umana followed the save by scoring the decisive kick.

The Ticos were leading 1-0 and on the verge of securing a spot in the quarterfinals when Greece’s Sokratis Papastathopoulos forced extra time with a goal in the 91st minute. At that point, Costa Rica, playing with just 10 men since the 66th minute when defender Oscar Duarte picked up second yellow card in the match, seemed to have squandered its chance of reaching the quarterfinals for the first time at a World Cup.

By the time that Umana’s powerful penalty shot went past Greece goalkeeper Orestis Karnezis to seal the win, the heartbreak had switched to the other side. Instead of Costa Rica lamenting its inability to close out the game in stoppage time at the end of the second half, Greece was left regretting its inability to capitalize on its man advantage in the 30 minutes of extra time.

How Hillary Won Over the Skeptical Left

Amid Clinton’s miscues while promoting her new book, widely seen as a test-launch for 2016, the media has been quick to revive memories of 2008.

Jennifer Reeves 1963 – 2014, With Apologies To ee cummings' (Buffalo Bill's)

Jennifer Reeves has

passed

who used to

turn word and image

mememe and

hoitytoityness

into a playground game

of marbles

shattered prisms

of

steelies and boulders

superegos and ids

andmocktheworldandloveitallatonce

Jeez

she brimmed with feisty multitudes

and what was once called blue eyed truth

and what i want to know is

why countenance

a house of cards whitney

retrospective of

an insufferable zeitgeist

garbed in a coonskin cap

when we can jubilate

the solstice apotheosis

of a Calamity

Jane of righteous irreverence and

lapidary repartee

2014-06-29-jenniferreevesmondrianguystickguyencounterheavenlyangstworksonpaperdrawingswatercolorsetcgouachezoom.jpg

Benghazi Case Unfolds Against Heated Political Backdrop

WASHINGTON (AP) — The first prosecution arising from the Benghazi attacks is playing out in the federal courthouse blocks from both the White House and Capitol Hill, an appropriate setting for a case that has drawn stark lines between President Barack Obama and Republicans in Congress.

The criminal proceedings could provide new insights into the 2012 attacks that killed four Americans and will serve as the latest test of the U.S. legal system’s ability to handle terrorism suspects captured overseas. Unfolding during an election year, the case against alleged mastermind Ahmed Abu Khattala could help shape the legacies of Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder, and spill over into the potential 2016 presidential candidacy of Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Untangling the law from the politics may prove especially challenging for the public, given how prominent the attacks on the diplomatic compound in the eastern Libyan city have become in U.S. political discourse.

“What’s going to matter to the public more than anything else is the result, and I think it’s going to only diffuse some of the ongoing Benghazi conspiracy theories if the Obama administration is going to be able to successfully obtain a conviction in this case,” said American University law professor Stephen Vladeck, a national security law expert.

Still, he said the case raises the same legal issues as past terrorism prosecutions and should not by itself be viewed as a referendum on the Obama administration.

“The story of this case is not the story of the Obama administration’s reaction to Benghazi,” he added. “The story of this case is those who were responsible for Benghazi and those who need to be held accountable for the four deaths that resulted.”

A 10-minute court appearance amid tight security Saturday was the American public’s first concrete sense of Abu Khatalla, the Libyan militant accused by the U.S. government of being a ringleader of attacks on Sept. 11, 2012.

U.S. special forces captured him in Libya during a nighttime raid two weeks ago, and he was transported to the U.S. aboard a Navy ship, where he was interrogated by federal agents. He was flown by military helicopter to Washington.

Prosecutors have yet to reveal details about their case, although the broad outlines are in a two-page indictment unsealed Saturday.

He pleaded not guilty to a single conspiracy charge punishable by up to life in prison, but the Justice Department expects to bring additional charges soon that could be more substantial and carry more dire consequences.

For instance, a three-count criminal complaint filed last year and unsealed after his capture charged Abu Khattala with killing a person during an attack on a federal facility — a crime that carries the death penalty.

His capture revived a debate on how to treat suspected terrorists from foreign countries, as criminal defendants with the protections of the U.S. legal system or as enemy combatants who should be interrogated for intelligence purposes and put through the military tribunal process at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

“If we’re doing to do this for everybody engaged in terrorism around the world, we’d better start building prisons by the dozens,” Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

He questioned the “sheer expense, the manpower, the planning” in preparing this criminal case.

The Justice Department considers that discussion moot.

Though a 2009 plan to prosecute several Guantanamo Bay detainees in New York City was aborted because of political opposition, Holder has said successful terrorism cases in U.S. courts — most recently the March conviction in New York of Osama bin Laden’s son-in-law — shows the civilian justice system’s capability to handle such defendants.

Experts say the Justice Department would not have embarked on Abu Khattala’s capture and prosecution if it didn’t feel comfortable after the case. Even so, cases like these are never easy.

Witnesses and evidence must be gathered from a hostile foreign country, and some of the evidence may be derived from classified information.

Any trial that occurs would take place years after the attack, raising concerns of foggy memories.

The case is being handled in Washington, where there’s less established case law on terrorism prosecutions than in New York, which more regularly has handled this kind of case.

Also, defense lawyers invariably will raise questions about Abu Khattala’s handling, including his interrogation aboard the ship and the point at which he was advised of his Miranda rights.

A U.S. official has said Abu Khatalla was read his Miranda rights at some point during the trip and continued talking. Rogers described him as “compliant but not cooperative.”

“There’s a whole host of challenges the government faces in this case,” said David Laufman, a Washington attorney and former Justice Department national security lawyer. “We don’t have transparency into how they are grappling with them or how they have or overcome some or all of them. This will not be an easy case to present.”

No matter how the case proceeds, the political backdrop will be unavoidable.

The rampage in Benghazi on the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks has long been a politically divisive issue, fueled by dueling and bipartisan accusations.

Republicans have criticized the response by Clinton, then the secretary of state, to the attacks. The GOP has accused the White House of misleading the American public and playing down a terrorist attack in the weeks before the 2012 presidential election. The White House has accused Republicans of politicizing the violence.

Multiple investigations and the release of tens of thousands of pages of documents have done little to quell the dispute.

It’s not clear whether the court case will resolve those questions. But, said Laufman, the legal issues alone will make it “fascinating to watch the case unfold.”

Biblical Hospital Advertising: Message of Hope or Despair?

St. Thomas Health is the second-largest hospital system in Nashville, Tennessee. This spring, they launched a sweeping multi-media advertising campaign centered on a verse from the Gospel of Luke: “For with God, nothing shall be impossible – Luke 1:37.” On billboards, park benches, city buses, and television commercials, this text accompanies striking photographs of newborn babies, cancer survivors, and other exuberant patients being cared for in wheelchairs or hospital beds. Like a promise, the ads suggest to faithful Christians that miracles are possible.

My daily commute takes me past St. Thomas’s west Nashville location. As often as I see ambulances or helicopters arrive at the hospital, I also see slow-moving hearses pass below the banner as they exit the complex. For every “miracle” that happens in those buildings, suffering and death rain down tenfold. I began to wonder how grieving families or patients discharged from the hospital with serious pain or disability might read that scripture. “Miracles can happen,” it seems to say, “just not to you.”

After a surgery at St. Thomas two years ago that left her with chronic pain even today, Eve Davidson, 34, received the message this way. “The ads make me feel like I am unworthy of being healed,” she reflects. “Every time I see that banner I am reminded that ‘nothing shall be possible’ to heal me.”

Indeed, the campaign strikes a negative chord for many. Rev. Viki Matson is the director of Vanderbilt Divinity School’s Field Education program and formerly a chaplain at St. Thomas Health (1985-1996). “At times of great spiritual anguish for patients and families, I find it completely inappropriate that the hospital that is charged with their care would make promises about God they simply cannot keep,” she says. “Implying that miracles happen in this hospital, that the impossible is somehow possible, is a slickly marketed version of snake oil.”

Former hospice chaplain Peter Capretto expresses a similar concern. “The ad campaign walks a fine line between expressing an essential Christian motivation in healthcare and capitalizing on the religious expectations of vulnerable individuals and families,” he says. “While the fiscal outcomes of the message may be measurable, the social and spiritual consequences to patients and their loved ones are not, which is precisely the danger.”

Less grandiose than its current advertising campaign, St. Thomas’s long-standing mission reads, “Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable,” it reads. A typical day at St. Thomas begins with a prayer over the hospital-wide intercom, and a crucifix hangs on the wall of every patient room. St. Thomas is unapologetic about its Catholic foundation and commitment to the spiritual health of patients. However, the advertising campaign appears to take this a step further and move from spiritual health to spiritual manipulation.

Representatives of St. Thomas Health and the Bohan Advertising Agency were quick to defend and celebrate the campaign as well as cite the effort they put into getting it right. “We wrestled with this [concern] a lot,” says Jeremi Griggs, who directs the St. Thomas account with Bohan. “What does this mean to people in bad situations?”

Griggs explains that the scripture isn’t a promise that miracles will happen, but rather an expression of hope. “We believe that with God, the impossible can happen,” he says. “If it doesn’t turn out that way, with God I can move on, I can see a bigger plan, or I can recover.” He points out that St. Thomas Health views itself as a ministry, and this message of hope is its defining feature.

Rebecca Climer, Senior Vice President and Chief Communications Officer of St. Thomas Health, agrees and points out that the campaign is the product of a two-year “purpose initiative” and process of discernment. “[We] are not ignoring or insensitive to the fact that lives end, injuries and illness happen, and work is difficult,” reads a disclaimer of the campaign on the hospital’s website. “We are saying that, by working together as one healing community and within the will of God, we bring about the reign of God here on earth.” Like Griggs, Climer emphasizes the “hopeful” message and notes that the campaign is “inspirational and aspirational.” And like Griggs, she is quick to point out, “We do not want to trade on our faith.”

Both Griggs and Climer insist that St. Thomas Health does not want to “trade on its faith.” But by presenting Luke 1:37 as the central motif of a large, multimedia advertising campaign, that is exactly what they are doing. The scripture combined with inspirational photographs of people at various stages of surviving various ailments suggests that such survival is possible, and it is especially possible at St. Thomas Health because God is on their side.

Just down the street from St. Thomas West Hospital, a large billboard looms over a busy intersection. Equipped with an ever-changing digital number, it announces exactly how many minutes (usually a very low number) one can expect to wait in the emergency room of another local hospital. As drivers continue down the road, the miracle of a short wait in the emergency room is quickly eclipsed by the miracle of surviving any disease or injury that St. Thomas offers. By offering a spiritual remedy in the form of billboards and television commercials intended to lure patients into its care, St. Thomas is exactly “trading on faith.”

Photographer Jeremy Cowart worked with the ad agency to produce the campaign’s imagery. “It’s a message of hope,” he says. “I would want to know that my hospital believes that anything is possible. Miracles happen every day, and this scripture is incredibly inspiring and hopeful to me.”

Few of the people I spoke to had any idea about the actual context of Luke 1:37. It comes when Mary questions the angel Gabriel about how she will become pregnant since she is a virgin. Gabriel points to her cousin Elizabeth, who is pregnant after many years of having been barren, and announces, “nothing will be impossible with God” (NRSV). Indeed, Mary does become pregnant. The implication of draping this verse across a hospital entrance is that any kind of healing is possible: a barren woman becomes pregnant, and then even a virgin becomes pregnant.

St. Thomas Health does not offer fertility treatments.

Ellen T. Armour is the Carpenter Chair in Feminist Theology at Vanderbilt University. Her concern is that this ad campaign opens up the question of theodicy–reconciling God’s goodness with suffering in the world. “My worry is that patients may even blame St. Thomas when they don’t get the miracle they’re essentially promising,” she says. “Ascribing success to divine intervention means that you risk ascribing failure to God’s callousness. Why didn’t God intervene in my case?”

Armour points to the promise of God’s presence as depicted in the Psalms or in the Gospel of John as better theological responses to patients and families who don’t get the outcome they were hoping for. Similarly, Viki Matson also suggests that a stronger, greater hope lies in the Jesus who accompanies (as in Romans 8) rather than a God who performs miracles.

Cowart was drawn to the advertising campaign by the resonance of the Luke verse in his personal life. “That’s a very similar verse to Philippians 4:13 which says, ‘I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me,'” he writes on his blog. “My Dad taught me that verse over and over growing up cause I never really thought I was capable of anything. So this theme for the verse really hit home.”

Also distinct, the Philippians verse says something quite different than the Luke text, and perhaps offers a better way forward for those who struggle with celebrating a saving and healing God who neither saves nor heals them. The idea that Christ offers the strength to face whatever difficult outcome rather than the power to alter events removes the risk of disappointment and faith crisis.

Patients and families may also be encouraged by the moments in scripture in which Jesus struggles with his own suffering. At Gethsemane he asks, “Father, if you are willing, remove this cup from me” (Lk. 22:42-44//Mt. 26:36//Mk 14:36). In the Gospel of John, Jesus grieves alongside Mary and Martha for Lazarus when he appears to arrive too late to save him (“Jesus began to weep” Jn. 11:35).

The twenty-third psalm has long offered the comfort of God’s presence to those who grieve: “Even though I walk through the darkest valley, I fear no evil; for you are with me; your rod and your staff–they comfort me” (v. 4). These verses don’t play as well in the advertising world as promises of the impossible, but they may come closer to providing comfort to those who are sick or injured and their families than hope for a miracle that only comes to a select few.

2014-06-26-IMG_4713.JPG
St. Thomas West, Nashville, Tennessee

2014-06-26-IMG_4653.JPG
St. Thomas Midtown, Nashville, Tennessee

2014-06-26-10014816_10152780133814692_6894854112003468651_o1024x768.jpg
St. Thomas West, Nashville, Tennessee

2014-06-26-IMG_4749.JPG
Bus stop, Nashville, Tennessee

2014-06-26-10449517_510279559101608_6658025120807367642_n.jpg
Nashville Metropolitan Transit Authority, Downtown Nashville, Tennessee
(image courtesy of Jeremy Cowart at http://jeremycowart.com/2014/05/nothing-shall-be-impossible/)

CHOMSKY'S VESSEL: Art Preview

I’m pleased to note that Gary Lloyd’s 1978 work, “Chomsky’s Vessel,” will once again be on public display in “Valley Vista,” a group show curated by Damon Willick and opening in August at CSU Northridge. I wrote about this particular piece when it was last shown at the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles in 2010. Here are some updated thoughts:

2014-06-30-photo.JPG
“Chomsky’s Vessel,” 1978, 44″ x 8″ x 12″, Encyclopedia Americana and chain binder. Collection Michael Salerno, Los Angeles. Photo: Gary Lloyd

A remarkable, insistently physical presence, Gary Lloyd’s “Chomsky’s Vessel” is a powerful and complex poetic metaphor expressed through the juxtaposition of two apparently incompatible elements: the complete edition of an Encyclopedia Americana, “dug out” in the manner of a primitive canoe and clamped together by means of the second element, a heavy chain binder. The piece is intended for display on the floor, where we look down into it from above–and where, low as it is in stature, it might actually trip up the unconscious gallery-goer and shock him into a proper state of awareness!

The work’s power, surely, lies in part in the deceptive simplicity of its statement, its unequivocal “there”-ness. But penetrate beyond its physical presence, and you find yourself in a rich tangle of associations. Given the vulva represented by its interior and the phallus represented by the solid, unyielding handle of the chain, we think of male and female, the yin and the yang, and the snug, if complex relationship between the two: suggested here is the kind of constriction (social, cultural, emotional) against which women have understandably rebelled in the last century of our human history. The female element, though, calmly evokes the power of the internal, the container “vessel,” the place of safety.

We may think of the essential lightness of the canoe–a craft that is eminently adapted to the natural environment, speedy and easily maneuverable, propelled across the surface of the water by no more than the natural current and the strength of its occupant; in “Chomsky’s Vessel,” though, it is juxtaposed with and, again, constricted by, the weight of the tomes that give it form, and of the rough chain that binds it. Our minds turn to the aboriginal intelligence of our species, envisioning through the sheer power of the imagination the potential of a tree (and yes, green reader, the encyclopedia was certainly at one time a tree!), and crafting from its trunk the boat that will transport a man more efficiently than his feet. We think, in this context, of the labor involved, and the primitive means of making, the hammer and chisel, in relation to the high-tech tools we have at our disposal in our world today.

We think, too, of the great achievements of our species, language, science and technology, the sum of everything peculiarly human that the encyclopedia contains within its covers by way of “information.” We think of the violence perpetrated on an object in which our culture has invested so much respect: the book, lynchpin of half a millennium of human progress. We may even speculate further into the future on the questionable persistence of this hitherto esteemed medium of communication… We may question whether knowledge itself is now constricted by our society’s politically willful ignorance–ignorance about, say, our misuse of the planet that we call our home; and wonder whether the binder is one of our own making, or one imposed on us by powers (corporate? governmental?) greater than our own.

We may, finally, wonder about our traditional way of thinking about art itself, how we define it–in this case “sculpture.” For Gary Lloyd, the artist, “Chomsky’s Vessel” represents “the voyage into the unknown and the compression of ideas into objects”–the essence of the sculptor’s art. It’s about “the primitive exploration of tools and mechanics, and a break from the plinth”–the pedestal upon which the sculpture and, by extension, art itself has been placed by an overly reverent and consumerist elite, an object of veneration, never to be touched by human hand–nor accidentally tripped over!

Or we may step back, away from all the rationalization of meanings and associations, and allow the poetic metaphor of the piece to do its work, grabbing hold of our imagination with nothing but its stubborn, irreducible presence. This, of course, is the work of poetry, the work of the poetic object that the artist has created. And then we may decide to rest there, instead of thinking it all through, in pleasurable contemplation of its mystery.

Nexcare Acne Covers Suck The Life Out Of Your Zits

Nexcare Acne Absorbing Covers There are a ton of creams and washes on the market that claim to combat
acne. Some work; some don’t, but they are all kind of a hassle to use. Nexcare has come
up with a new kind of acne product that looks to be a lot simpler.

This Is A Good Time To Catch Up On American Horror Story

Now that we know what the next season of American Horror Story is about, it’s a good time to catch up on the last few seasons of the show if you haven’t already seen it.

Read more…



Facebook explains why it briefly toyed with users' emotions

Ever since word got out that Facebook had briefly manipulated some users’ News Feeds to see how their feelings changed, a number of questions have popped up: just why did the company feel compelled to experiment in the first place? How noticeable was…

KLM tweet on Mexico’s World Cup exit ignites anger

klmbadtweetFrom time to time, sports event like World Cup brings the best of us, AND also the worse in many – that include companies. KLM, a national air carrier from Netherlands decided it was funny to tweet “Adios Amigos!” accompanied with a departure sign photo that includes a man in sombrero and a poncho as soon as Netherlands beats Mexico … Continue reading