Elyjah Marrow, Ice-T's Grandson, Arrested For Killing Roommate

Elyjah Marrow, grandson of rapper and actor Ice-T, was arrested after he accidentally shot and killed his 19-year-old roommate, TMZ reports.

According to the report, Marrow, 19, was playing with a handgun in his Georgia apartment June 24 when it went off and fatally shot Daryus Johnson. Marrow was hit with a slew of charges, including involuntarily manslaughter, possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony, reckless conduct, possession of a stolen firearm and possession of marijuana.

He currently remains in custody.

Head over to TMZ for more on Elyjah Marrow’s arrest.

Restaurant That Banned Tips Gives All Gratuity To Charity And Pays Workers Competitive Wages

A new restaurant in San Antonio has a policy that’s challenging the status quo and raising some eyebrows in the process. Its servers don’t take home their tips — not a single penny of them.

Oaks Crossing opened its doors last Friday and, with its unique methods of paying employees, became the first restaurant in San Antonio to embrace a no-tips policy while benefiting the greater good, KENS 5 News reported.

Although the restaurant’s manager, Nick George, is “flattered and humbled” that customers are moved to leave a few dollars on their tables before leaving, he’s currently discouraging them from doing so. But when gratuity is given (the restaurant had collected about $600 when KENS 5 News reported the story on Wednesday) the money is donated to a good cause. The first to benefit from Oaks Crossing’s satisfied patrons is the local Parman Branch Library.

A restaurant spokesperson told the news source that instead of relying on tips, servers are compensated with a competitive wage.

“I think they need to put signs out or at least notify you, inform you somehow,” one man told KENS 5 News after dining at Oaks Crossing, noting that customers still tip mostly because they’re in the dark on the rule. Management said they’re still trying to figure out the wording for signs that will inform diners of the policy, as the restaurant just opened recently.

Restaurant chain Waffle House recently drew similar attention for a company-wide tipping policy, but for all the wrong reasons. After a generous diner at one of the restaurant’s locations in North Carolina gave a $1,000 tip to his server on Mother’s Day, Waffle House management gave the tip back to the anonymous do-gooder. According to company policy, large tips charged on a credit card are automatically returned to the customer.

The story had a happy ending, however, when the patron caught wind of the story and returned to the restaurant to write a check for $1,000.

Like Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter

Columbus Short Ordered To Pay $21,000 A Month In Spousal, Child Support To Estranged Wife Tanee Short: Report

Things aren’t getting any easier for Columbus Short. The fired Scandal star has been ordered to pay spousal and child support to his estranged wife Tanee Short, TMZ reports. The couple share a 2-year-old daughter.

Things Get Super-Awkward When CNBC Discusses Whether Tim Cook Is Gay

America’s most testosterone-fueled news channel just had itself a little chat about gay CEOs. It went about as smoothly as you might expect.

New York Times columnist Jim Stewart was on CNBC Friday morning discussing the mystery of why chief executives in Corporate America aren’t outing themselves left and right. He has a new column — with the very New York Timesy headline “Among Gay CEOs, The Pressure To Conform” — about former BP CEO John Browne, who has only discussed his own sexuality after retirement.

Stewart, who is openly gay, expressed surprise that none of the gay CEOs he talked to for the column — and there are many, apparently — were willing to go on the record about their experience.

At which point CNBC anchor Simon Hobbs interjected:

“I think Tim Cook is fairly open about the fact that he is gay at the head of Apple, isn’t he?”

There followed approximately four seconds of utter silence — an eternity in television time — while the other four people on the set each looked like they might have pooped their pants just a little bit.

(If you’re pressed to for time, you can fast-forward to about the 47th second of the video to hear Hobbs start his comment.)

When they were able to express themselves again, they could do so only in guttural tones rather than coherent thoughts:

“Mmmmmmm, no,” intoned Stewart.

“Ohhhhh dear,” said Hobbs. “Was that an error?”

“Wow!” said CNBC reporter David Faber. “I think you just… yeah.”

All the while, Stewart’s head was on a greased swivel of disapproval:

Turns out, funny story, Cook has not been open at all about his sexuality, or much of anything else in his private life for that matter, perhaps because what the hell difference does it make?

People point to a December speech, when Cook said, “I have seen and have experienced many types of discrimination, and all of them were rooted in the fear of people that were different than the majority.”

Which is not quite the same thing as saying, “Hey, America, guess what, I’m gay!” And Cook was also talking in that speech about cross-burning and racial discrimination he saw growing up in the South.

Cook has publicly advocated — including in the op-ed pages of The Wall Street Journal, of all places — for an end to workplace discrimination based on sexual identity. But that is evidence only of common sense, not sexuality.

Other news outlets have declared that Cook is gay, but Cook has been silent on the matter. So it’s not really Stewart’s or CNBC’s place to break that silence.

“I don’t want to comment about anybody who might or might not be, because… I-I’m not gonna out anybody,” Stewart said on CNBC, when he had recovered.

And that was pretty much the end of the most-awkward segment ever on CNBC, after which everybody immediately resumed shouting loudly about stock prices and the Federal Reserve and Obamacare, or whatever it is they’re always mad about. At least, I assume that’s what happened — like everybody else in America, I usually watch CNBC with the sound off.

5 Apps To Help Change The World

Forget about Angry Birds and Yo. These apps aim to educate and empower — and are the newest tactic for tech-savvy activists.

June 28, 1914: What a Difference a Day Makes

2014-06-26-StanleyWallenstein.jpg
The author’s great-uncle, Stanley Wallenstein (1909-1914)

One day in history can change a family – or the world – forever.

My grandfather had a brother he never met. There were no memories of his brother to relay, no stories of two boys growing up together in 1920s New York City and no stickball in the streets. But every once in a while – during conversations about his (and my) family – my grandfather would talk about his long dead brother, Stanley.

It was only a few years ago, after beginning my own research on my (and his) family, that I discovered an interesting historical significance about Stanley. I knew that he died very young. I knew that he died before my grandfather was born. But that was all I knew.

On a visit to the family plot at an old cemetery in Queens, I read the details about Stanley’s entire life carved into stone.

Stanley – age five – died on June 28, 1914, the very same day that Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary was assassinated, along with his wife, exactly 100 years ago this weekend.

On June 28, 1914, while visiting Sarajevo, a territory of the Austrian empire, Archduke Ferdinand and his wife, Sophie, were shot to death while they rode in an open car. Their murders, at the hands of a Serbian national group, set off a chain of events which led to the beginning of World War I.

The Great War would last four years and claim 37 million lives.

Just as the murder of the Archduke bent history, the death of my great-grandparents’ first child had tremendous implications for my family. My great-grandfather, Joseph, was almost 40 when Stanley was born in February of 1909. The son of German Jewish immigrants, Joseph – a former tobacco merchant turned leather merchant – owned a prosperous business near Union Square. In 1906, he married Martha Schallek, the daughter of Austrian immigrants. Just as Joseph’s fellow New Yorker Theodore Roosevelt was about to yield the White House to William Howard Taft – the Wallensteins had a son, named Stanley.

Then, in the spring of 1914, Joseph and Martha went through the worst experience any parents can go through. Stanley died from “appendicitis and peritonitis” (an inflammation of the tissue that lines the inner wall of the abdomen). One can only assume that in 1914 the death of a five-year-old from appendicitis was a sudden and traumatic event in the lives of this family. But they persevered.

As Joseph and Martha grieved for their child, the war in Europe dragged on. In May of 1915, the American civilian ship Lusitania was torpedoed by a German U-boat, killing 128 Americans. (My great-grandfather, Joseph, had once traveled on the Lusitania for business.)

By April of 1917, the United States had declared war on Germany and the other axis powers. Around that same time, Martha Wallenstein was pregnant again. On August 1, 1917 she gave birth to another son – my future grandfather – named Herbert, in memory of her late father.

In 1928, when my grandfather was 10, his father Joseph died after a bout of pneumonia at the age of 58. But again, the family persevered.

Raised primarily by his mother, my grandfather attended the City University of New York, fought in WWII, went to law school, became an attorney and eventually an Assistant New York State Attorney General under the great Louis Lefkowitz. He also married, had two children and later, two grandchildren.

Presumably, just as the death of the Archduke dramatically altered the course of world history, my grandfather would most likely never have existed if Stanley hadn’t died that Sunday a century ago. Joseph was 44 and Martha was 30 when Stanley died. Both were well past the normal age to have children, especially in the early 20th century. With Stanley, they were probably content having one child. Most likely, they decided to have another only because Stanley had died.

The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand on June 28, 1914 changed the world more dramatically and more directly than any other assassination in modern history. Europe was already teetering on the brink of war and it took one bullet in Sarajevo to push it over the edge. The lingering effects of the First World War were directly responsible for the Second World War a quarter of a century later. The effects of that war are still felt to this very day in our policies and our way of life.

Similarly, the death of little Stanley Wallenstein on June 28, 1914 had a direct impact on my family. My great-grandparents chose to have another child after they experienced such a great loss. It’s a good thing they did – at least for my father, my aunt, me, my sister, my niece and my two children.

One day can truly change the world – or a family – forever.

My Misguided Letter (and What It Says About Feminism Today)

The majority of today’s youth is grossly uninformed and misinformed regarding the subject of feminism. Issues surrounding the gender gap are lost somewhere between college applications and countless hours of Netflix. Sadly, too many teenage girls are convinced that feminism is repulsive to prospective boyfriends, while too many teenage boys are convinced that feminists are launching personal attacks on every male alive. Not to say that I’m above this age of not-so-correct information. In fact, up until very recently, I was completely in the dark myself.

My sophomore year, I had no idea what feminism was. To be quite honest, in my mind, the word was vaguely associated with armpit hair and bra burning. As I did not want to be a bra-burning, man-hating, armpit-hair-growing feminist, I denied any association with the movement while simultaneously (and unknowingly) supporting everything feminism stands for.

This led to a stand off between my parents and I. Homecoming was around the corner, and I just didn’t understand why my date was expected to pay for my dinner, ticket and bus ride to the dance. Despite my lack of understanding of the modern feminist movement, the fact that he was paying still just didn’t seem right. It didn’t make sense that he had to pay simply because he was of a different gender. I knew that this particular double standard was in my favor, but it felt somehow unequal.

So, I began to argue my case, telling my parents that I would be taking a stand — paying for my own ticket, my own meal and my own bus ride. Both of them laughed, and informed me that somewhere along the way, I had become a feminist. Taking this extremely offensively (as I believed that feminists were man-hating hippies who had some unexplained vendetta against razors), I launched into a full-on rant, eventually ending in me writing an angry (and slightly embarrassing) letter to my parents.

This letter explained very matter-of-factly that I was not a feminist. I open the letter with the statement “I am not a feminist.” In the body of the letter, I express my distaste for double standards, explain that women and men are equal and argue against women being treated as the lesser sex. I proceed to end the letter with the horribly misguided statement “I am not a feminist.”

I’ve come a long way since then. Junior year, after reading up on true feminism, I finally embraced my status as a feminist and began openly and unabashedly speaking out against misogyny. I’ve found that many teenagers are fooled into thinking that the feminist movement means throwing away femininity or hating men. Many people openly support feminist ideals (like equal pay and the end of derogatory language towards women), but refuse to identify as feminists because they don’t understand the word or its definition.

Feminism as defined by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (or as most of us likely know her — the lady giving a monologue about women in Beyonce’s “***Flawless”) is the social, political and economic equality of the sexes. As far as I’m concerned, that doesn’t include a clause requiring all self-respecting women to boycott bras, razors, men or even high heels.

This generation is the future. It’s necessary that we educate ourselves. And, whether we talk to our peers, try to make changes in schools or even publish some moving tweets, it’s necessary that we banish the stigma from the word ‘feminist’ for our future. The first step towards equality is understanding. And, if the next generation doesn’t understand feminism, how will the movement make any progress?

'Love Boat' Star Jill Whelan Is Getting A Divorce

Jill Whelan — the actress who played Captain Stubing’s daughter Vicki on “The Love Boat” — is headed for a divorce.

TMZ reports that the 47-year-old actress has filed for divorce from her husband John Chaykowsky after a decade of marriage. Whelan reportedly requested full legal and physical custody of their 8-year-old son, as well as spousal support.

News of the split comes a few weeks after Whelan — who you may also remember as the “sick girl” in the movie “Airplane!” — reunited with some of her “Love Boat” co-stars for an episode of “Oprah: Where Are They Now?”

Here’s a photo of the actress in more recent times:

jill whelan
(Photo by Vince Bucci/Getty Images)

Keep in touch! Check out HuffPost Divorce on Facebook and Twitter. Sign up for our newsletter here.

There's Nothing Left To Be Afraid Of

Click here to watch the TEDTalk that inspired this post.

I must surely have a unique perspective on the subject of being eaten alive because, well, I have been. I lost my right arm from my elbow down to a shark and most of my right leg. But, strange as it might sound, I still don’t bear the creatures any ill-will. In fact, I’m the first person to support the cause of shark preservation.

I’ve always been terrified of sharks. So even I found it a bit odd that I chose a career as an Australian Navy Clearance Diver. Then again, I’ve never been accused of doing anything too smart. But, doing my job, even my buddies knew that I was scared and used to pin pictures of giant Great Whites on my locker at work. Yet it was never enough to stop me. I had a job to do, a mission to complete, a task at hand and that always came first.

Besides, I told myself, I had more chance of dying on my motorbike on the way to work than when I was diving. That’s what I reminded myself when I was underwater and started seeing shadows moving in the murk anyway. And the fateful day, four years ago, that a bull shark finally got me, I didn’t see it coming… I was taking part in an anti-terrorism exercise, and I’d been swimming on my back.

So as someone growing up scared of sharks, I completely understand other people’s fear; that all-encompassing terror of being torn to shreds in front of your own eyes. I get it, and I’ve coached many people to battle that and to be able to enter the ocean for the first time.

Because, of course, from the beginning of time, humans have feared what they don’t understand and then tried to kill their enemies. We’re seeing that happening right now with the Western Australian government deploying drum lines and killing sharks indiscriminately. They reckon that is much easier than to live happily alongside them. Meanwhile, those who preach saving animals and the planet are routinely portrayed as tree-hugging hippies with dreadlocks and smelly armpits.

But the world is changing and that’s just as well because the planet and its inhabitants are in dire trouble. All of us.

Is it really logical to fear being eaten by a shark so much when far more people get killed crossing the street while looking at their smart phones? We have exponential world population growth creating massive shortages in food stocks, civil war in a post U.S.-stabilized Iraq disrupting fuel supplies, religious zealots murdering thousands, storm fronts wiping out whole towns, sink holes sucking up streets, mosquito-borne diseases killing over 700,000 people a year and more people killing themselves each year than are ever nibbled by sharks. We clearly need much more protection from ourselves.

On the plus side, science and technology are allowing us to re-align the balance between mother earth and ourselves. And thank God for those smart people, I say. Without them, I’d be walking around on a peg leg with a hook hand instead of this electronic leg with six micro processors, a gyroscope, an accelerometer and a hand that functions by measuring the electrical impulses created by the flexion of my forearm muscles. For a double amputee, I have an incredible quality of life.

At the same time, scientists have created a banana with six times the amount of vitamin A, which could potentially save so many lives blighted by malnutrition around the world. An Australian solar plant has generated “supercritical” steam that rivals fossil fuels. Tesla has created the first commercially available electric sports car, and it looks awesome. And another bunch of scientists, we now know, have created a shark-deterrent wetsuit to protect ourselves and, in turn, protect our sharks.

What a great idea! As well as looking after ourselves, we really need to look after our wildlife, too. It’s the breadth and diversity of the animals that exist on our planet that help make our own lives so rich and meaningful. David Attenborough and the late Steve Irwin have for decades been attempting to share this wondrous world with all of us in the hope that we might find the same love for it that they have and to inspire others into acting as guardians against those that would do them harm.

There are not many of us who are going to go through an encounter with our worst nightmare that leave us with vital bits missing and with nothing left to fear. But our world is made more amazing by its danger, more exciting with its risks. People are hurt and killed every minute of every day, and yet we’re not cave-dwelling troglodytes living in fear of everything around us.

Instead we embrace our world and relish in its grandeur. My message is to be inspired and amazed and frightened at its beauty and danger but, more importantly, do what you can to protect it and all that it holds before there’s nothing left to love… or to be afraid of.

We want to know what you think. Join the discussion by posting a comment below or tweeting #TEDWeekends. Interested in blogging for a future edition of TED Weekends? Email us at tedweekends@huffingtonpost.com.

7 Things You Personally Should Avoid as a Parent

I was inspired by a friend who one day noted that any time she read a list written by “experts” about things she should never do as a parent, she inevitably failed at a minimum of 80 percent of those things. I fail at closer to 100 percent. I put my kids to bed too early, or I put them to bed too late. I let them cry too much, or I shouldn’t have let them sleep in our bed. I fed them solid foods too early, or fed them the wrong ones, or kids shouldn’t be eating steak at six months.

So I thought, “Why the hell not create the definitive list of things parents shouldn’t do? And if anyone fails at my list, they deserve to feel bad about it.”

There’s nothing people like more than getting advice from other parents, especially when those parents don’t know them at all and have never met their children. So here goes — my list of seven things I don’t think a parent should ever do.

1. Don’t put your child’s head into the mouth of a hungry (or even a recently fed) shark.
I think it’s important that parents who are doing this stop doing this. Sharks, especially those who have been starved for days, can severely injure a child, particularly one who still has an undeveloped soft spot on the top of his or her head. Are you one of the parents who regularly does this? You’re doing things wrong.

2. Don’t give your 3-year-old a boa constrictor and agree to let them sleep together but “just for one night.”
Now, giving a boa constrictor as a gift, in and of itself, could maybe work out just fine for families. Would I do it? No, but I’m deathly afraid of pictures of snakes, so I sure as hell don’t want a real one in my house. If you do take the route of buying one, it’s highly recommended that you don’t let your snake and your son or daughter spend the first night alone in the child’s bed. Snakes like this use constricting techniques to kill things. A child is a thing. You doing this? You’re parenting poorly.

3. Don’t show your kids that you can slide down the chimney just like Santa Claus.
It seems so tempting, doesn’t it, especially if you have the luxury of a having lot of butter in your house (for baking, of course) that you can use to grease the sides of the chimney? What’s going to happen, though, is that you’re going to get stuck in your chimney. You might even die. That does not make for good Christmas memories going forward. Oh God, have you already done this? You’re a terrible parent.

4. Don’t bathe your children in Coke.
Some parents won’t even have Coke in the house — did you know that? That’s something else, but I’d never say you’re a bad parent just because you keep a bottle (or even a case of 24 cans) of Coke in your kitchen. Now, if you start bathing your children in Coke, that’s a different story. Unless, of course, your child is a tooth you’re looking to make disappear — or a green penny you’d like to make coppery again. If that’s your situation, you’re forgiven for bathing your kids in Coke, because that’s really all you can do. If not, and you’re still bathing them in pop, shame on you. And, you’re a bad parent.

5. Don’t re-enact the alien-through-the-stomach scene from Alien with your kids using a real alien in their stomach.
Doing this with props is cool. In fact, doing this with props puts you on the other end of the parenting spectrum, the end where people put your picture on their list of things you SHOULD do as a parent. If you’re luring aliens into your child’s stomach with indecipherable boops and beeps or a food recipe you’ve found on Pinterest that aliens are supposedly big on, your child might be better off in a different home. This scene cannot be re-enacted using real aliens, I’m telling you that right now. If you’re sitting on your family room couch right now feeling for aliens in your kid’s stomach, you’re a bad parent.

6. Don’t go exploring random snowy mountains dressed for spring weather looking for a snowman named Olaf.
I know the temptation to do this all too well. I’m not even suggesting that looking for Olaf in proper winter clothing is wrong — I know I’d do it — but you simply cannot put your kid in a dress alone and let them explore. Skin a bear, drape some heavy moss over your shoulder, do something to brace yourselves against the cold air of a snowy mountain. If you don’t do this, let me be the one to tell you that you’re a bad parent.

7. Don’t change your parenting style because an “expert” has a list that suggests you’re parenting wrong.
This happened to me once because we used a “cry it out” method for sleep training. I was quoted saying we used that method in a story in the Globe and Mail, and in the next sentence I was called “emotionally unavailable.” Because the person making this statement had capitalized letters following their name, I thought they must be right. Then I remembered that I hugged and kissed and talked to and laughed with and read to and bathed and fed my children every day. Oh, and I forgot that the person with all the letters wasn’t the parent to my children. We were the parents. We made choices we deemed best for our kid. Hooray! So forget these stupid lists (well, except this one) because they are written almost 100 percent of the time by somebody who isn’t the parent of your children.

I sincerely hope you didn’t fail at too many of these.

@media only screen and (min-width : 500px) {.ethanmobile { display: none; }}

Like Us On Facebook |
Follow Us On Twitter |
Contact HuffPost Parents

Also on HuffPost: