One Year Down, How Many More to Go?

One year ago today the U.S. Senate passed comprehensive immigration reform. One year later, the GOP controlled U.S. House has yet to even vote on reform.

Even as the immigration crisis continues to grow, they refuse to act. The surge of immigrants on our Southwestern border underscores what we know to be true: We need immigration reform and we need it now. We need the U.S. House. We need the Republican Party to listen to business, and act now.

Some have argued for calling up the National Guard to the border. Using the guardsmen to turn away children fleeing rampant violence cannot be the solution. Instead of spending $12,500 of taxpayer money to deport just one person, we need a responsible, long-term solution. We are a nation built by immigrants and yet some argue we should go against our history and economy to spend $137 billion ignoring the solutions staring us in the face.

Given the current state of our economy, I don’t think we should be spending $137 billion in order to ultimately harm both American businesses and American workers.

2014-06-27-ImmigrationreformrallyinLosAngeles_5_1.jpg

Leading economists across the political spectrum agree with the United States Chamber of Commerce; immigrants provide a net benefit to the economy. Undocumented workers contribute $15 billion every year to Social Security, taking out only $1 billion during that same period. Even so, some insist on wasting law enforcement’s time, spending taxpayer dollars, harming business and damaging payroll and other tax incomes by deporting working immigrants.

Instead of fighting a costly, unwinnable, and illogical fight we should use the solution that has been sitting on the table for a year. Granting citizenship to the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants who currently reside in the United States would add more than $1.5 trillion to the U.S. economy in the next ten years while the bill also strengthens our borders. These gains would come through additional taxes, and increased consumption and they are why comprehensive immigration reform is good for both families and business.

Well, some say, immigrants take away jobs from American workers. They are wrong.

Evidence shows that immigrants do not take away jobs from native-born workers. Undocumented workers benefit skilled workers; they do not compete with them.

It’s Economics 101; specialization leads to greater productivity and growth. When immigrants are working on a construction site or in a restaurant they free up the more specialized American workers to focus on what they’re specifically trained to do. Since these higher-skilled workers receive higher wages, it is in the best interest of business to have them working on tasks that require their specific skill set. Lower paid and less highly trained workers take on the rest, reducing the overall cost of doing business.

This is why states with more immigrant workers, have stronger economies and boost skilled workers who make more money and work more hours. From 1990-2007, skilled workers in complimentary jobs saw their pay increase by up to 10 percent thanks to the addition of immigrant workers.

While House Republicans have faulted the Obama Administration and weak border security for the current crisis, they have no one to blame but themselves. Time and time again they have rejected immigration reform, even the moderate, bipartisan bill that cleared the Senate one year ago today. The clock is running, our elected representatives need to listen to American business and American economists. Pass comprehensive immigration reform.

Here's Video Of Kim Kardashian Being Accosted By Man In Blackface At The Vienna Ball

Remember back in February when Kim Kardashian and Kris Jenner were accosted by a guy in blackface at the Vienna Ball? Not cool, right? Well, they caught the entire incident on camera, and it’s not pretty.

The latest episode of “Keeping Up With The Kardashians,” airing on June 29, shows exactly how the reality stars reacted when “comedian” Chris Stephan, showed up in blackface makeup, mimicking Kardashian’s then-fiancé, now-husband Kanye West.

Kardashian didn’t comment on the incident at the time, but she told the camera, “I can’t believe there’s this guy in full blackface. I just am so confused. I don’t get why him or anyone else would find this funny.”

She added, “Is this just like a sick joke?”

Kardashian and her mother tried not to make a scene while making it clear that they wanted Stephan removed from the event. After giving a brief lesson in the history of blackface, Jenner told the camera, “To have someone so ignorant come to such a beautiful event and spoil it for everyone, is just taking a huge step backwards.”

The reality stars were so upset by the incident that they left the event (which Kardashian was reportedly paid $500,000 to attend) early.

This is the first time Kardashian has commented specifically on what went down at the Vienna Ball, but she did pen a blog post this past May addressing the issue of racism as a whole.

“To be honest, before I had North, I never really gave racism or discrimination a lot of thought. It is obviously a topic that Kanye is passionate about, but I guess it was easier for me to believe that it was someone else’s battle,” she wrote on May 7. “But recently, I’ve read and personally experienced some incidents that have sickened me and made me take notice. I realize that racism and discrimination are still alive, and just as hateful and deadly as they ever have been.”

As for Stephan, he offered a pseudo apology after news of his so-called “joke” broke back in February.

“I was nice and gentle, Richard Lugner called me and said ‘Kim wants to see her man, Chris do something.’ I just got dressed up and got into the Opera for free because of it 🙂 thanks Richi,” he wrote in one Facebook post. Later adding: “I’m very sorry that the whole thing went to shit and was completely misunderstood. I’m an Arab myself, born in Austria. I didn’t want to be racist in any way by doing this, and I apologize again to anyone who felt offended.”

10 Important Details Interviewers Notice

As a job applicant, you have probably given considerable thought as to what you will say when asked, “Tell me your strengths and weaknesses.” While it’s essential to plan your talking points for a successful interview, it’s equally important to pay attention to your non-verbal cues. Your interviewer is making judgments based on what they see throughout the interview. It’s your responsibility to minimize negative distractions and let your skills and personality shine.

  1. Extend your hand first. A confident person is someone who stands up for an introduction, looks the other person squarely in the eyes and reaches out their hand confidently for a handshake. The gesture is polite, assertive, and sends the message you have been properly groomed. Practice your introduction with a friend or colleague prior to your interview.
  2. Clothes freshly pressed and a mirror check. Walking into an interview with a wrinkled collar or ill-fitting slacks could be interpreted as lacking attention to small but important details. This is the only opportunity you will have to make a powerful first impression. Don’t wait until the last minute to determine if your suit still fits or whether you should buy a new shirt. Men, keep your suit jacket on during the interview, and women, if your skirt hits the middle of your thigh, in most work environments the length is too short.
  3. Select a purse or briefcase — not both. Women appear more prepared when they arrive with fewer leather bags and men appear more professional when they aren’t toting a backpack. Even if you are just out of college, carrying a quality (yet inexpensive) leather portfolio will help you look put together.
  4. Take notes. Bring a simple notepad and indiscriminate pen — not a scrap of paper and a pencil you took from the bank. If you are interviewing for a job in technology, a tablet device may also be a good option. Avoid setting up a laptop in the interview; the distraction and physical barrier it creates will outweigh any benefits it may have over a small tablet or notepad.
  5. Keep an eye on your nails. Even men can benefit from a good manicure before an important event. Don’t make the mistake of thinking, “No one will be looking at my hands.” Nails should be clean and trimmed, and hands reasonably smooth when shaking another person’s hand. Women, opt for a neutral color polish, not chipped or wearing away.
  6. Be on your best behavior in the company parking lot. As soon as you arrive on company property, you are “on.” Don’t think you will not be noticed as you speed through the parking garage, or swoop in front of a waiting vehicle for the closest parking spot. Never park in a reserved spot. It may be designated for the person interviewing you, or the owner of the company. Your movements can easily be traced by a parking lot camera.
  7. Put your game face on. Men, even though today’s fashion is accepting of a full beard, or varying levels of facial hair, your best option when applying for a job is a clean shave. If you refuse to cut the beard, get rid of the chops or soul patch and make sure you are neatly trimmed. Don’t forget to check the hair situation in the eyebrows, nose and ear area.
  8. Don’t be afraid to ask. When you have something to ask or add to the conversation, holding back can appear tentative or nervous. Speak up with a confident, assertive (not aggressive) tone, and show your interviewer you are putting thought into the conversation.
  9. Be aware that your emotions are contagious. According to Steve Gutzler, a leading expert in Emotional Intelligence, equally important to information exchanged in the interview is your mood, attitude, and emotions which directly influence the interviewer’s opinion. Appear engaged by sitting alert, nodding your head when appropriate, asking thoughtful questions and being an active listener and communicator.
  10. Turn off your phone. The last thing your potential employer wants to hear is the sound of an incoming call. Your interviewer will be influenced, and even a bit annoyed, to hear your phone buzz from your bag, brief case, or pant pocket. Eliminate the urge to text or check your email during a quick break by powering down until the interview is completely over and you are out of the building.

For more interview etiquette tips, visit Diane’s blog, connect with her here on the Huffington Post, follow her on Pinterest, and “like” The Protocol School of Texas on Facebook.

The Choice

“I have no choice,” the man said.

“What an opportunity,” God replied. She smiled.

2014-06-27-GODsmall.jpg

The man frowned and said nothing. This conversation followed.

Man: I mean no disrespect, God, but no choice means no opportunity. No free will. Shall I draw you a diagram?

God: The absence of free will is an illusion, an excuse to avoid accepting things you don’t like. If you deny free will, you trap yourself. If you choose free will, then free will opens opportunities to acknowledge love. Do you see? We always have a choice. We just have to recognize it.

Man: Easy for you to say — you’re omniscient.

God: And omnipresent.

Man: Modest, too.

God: Think about it this way. I am always with you. With everyone and everything. I am the great connector. Even beyond space and time. Because I’m always there, you only have to look for me to find me. Religions are access points — I am beyond doctrine and dogma. Like love. Like light. If you choose to find me, you will. And that is a choice you can make at any time, in any situation.

Man: Beautiful thought, God. But what about Job? Old Testament Job, remember him? You smote him with a whole lot of misfortune and illness and strife. You broke him. He felt forsaken. He had no choice but to suffer.

God: Job had faith. Please understand, all faith gets shaken. It depends on free will and requires each person continually to renew his or her choice to believe. Daily. Hourly. Sometimes moment by moment. Don’t be too tough on Job.

Man: I’m not tough on Job. You were tough on Job.

God: One choice you can make is to be grateful for hardship as well as joy.

Man: That sounds fun.

God: You’d be surprised what peace it can bring. Suffering is part of life. Happiness is part. When we choose to accept suffering, to learn from it, to let it deepen us, then our capacity for happiness grows. Life is richer, deeper and more beautiful when we accept all aspects. When we deny the whole, even for the sake of saving ourselves from pain, conflict and difficulty, our experience atrophies, our balance erodes and we sink too far into ourselves. Trying to avoid suffering is a dead end. Denying your own wholeness can leave you feeling trapped. But that’s not life trapping you, it’s your expectation that life should be other than it is.

Man: Let me get this straight. My big act of free will is to accept the crappy situation my life is in.

God: You’re learning.

Man: Doesn’t sound hopeful. I thought you were supposed to bring hope.

God: People bring hope. Hope is a choice.

Man: Is that all you talk about — free will?

God: No. There’s also love. They go together.

Man: Not in a war zone.

God: Anywhere. Anytime. Even outside the space-time continuum. They’re my secret sauce.

Man:Oh yeah. What’s the recipe?

God: It’s not really a secret. Actually, it’s very simple: anyone can use free will to choose love. You can use choose love, too.

Man: Even when I don’t think it will do any good.

God: Especially when you think it won’t do any good.

God said no more. And in the ensuing silence, there was space for the man to reconsider, emptiness for him to rearrange his theory of what was possible.

He picked up a piece of paper and wrote down how he felt: stuck, broken, lost and alone. He wrote down how his life was a dead end situation, how it sucked. He signed the bottom of the note with his full, legal signature to show that he accepted this description as his present state of being.

Then he ripped up the note and recycled it.

He stepped outside. He looked up at the top of a tree. He listened to a bird sing. He inhaled and, for the first time in a long time, heard and felt the intake of breath through his nose and the stream of air as it left his mouth.

He assessed his situation from beginning to end. Nothing had changed. All the outside elements remained the same. Yet, something was different. He felt different. Lighter, more able, less constrained.

He made a mental note to thank God next time they talked.

Does It Make Sense for Artists to Advertise?

Investing in one’s career is often touted as a sound business move, an act of confidence in the future, the cost of doing business, taking responsibility – that kind of talk. But, which career investments actually give you a return on that investment? For artists, most would agree that art school tuition was a vital expense, as are art supplies, a studio rental and the cost of creating a Web site to display and promote their work. Other forms of investment are more debatable, such as publishing a catalogue of your own artwork, hiring a publicist or career coach. (Certainly, some artists claim these expenditures are a major part of their success.)

Glendale, Arizona artist Bill Mittag “can’t determine the effectiveness of advertising,” but he still spends $6,000 or so per year on ads in such publications as Art of the West and Western Art Collector. “Every time I place an ad, the number of hits on my Web site picks up significantly.” Even more telling, “when a gallery has a show and puts a work of mine in the ad, I notice that every time that work sells.”

Still, Mittag is not confident that $6,000 or so he spends does much good – “no one has called me up to say, ‘I want that work I saw in your ad,'” – but it is a cost of doing business, of investing in his career, and he worries that not advertising would make things worse.

Advertising by fine artists is an area rife with question marks and the occasional success story. “My very first ad in the Maine Antique Digest, which cost me $500, resulted in the sale of a $36,000 sculpture,” said artist Andrew DeVries of Huntington, Massachusetts, adding that other ads he has placed in that monthly have earned him calls from prospective buyers, some of which led to sales. However, when he took out half a dozen ads in Art & Auction (there was a price discount for buying a series of ads, he noted), he claimed to have spent $20,000 and “got two sales out of it of $1,000 apiece.” Advertising is a “tricky thing,” he concluded, but he still averages $10,000-15,000 in advertising annually, some years going as high as $35,000 and other years far less.

Certainly, many art publications – some aimed at an artist readership, such as The Crafts Report, Plein Air or Sculpture Magazine, while others target collectors, including American Art Review, Fine Art Connoisseur and Art & Auction – are happy to accept ads from artists. Do artists get their money’s worth?

Placing ads is more associated with the design fields, such as illustration, than with fine art. Patricia McKiernan, executive director of the Graphic Artists Guild, noted that most of the artists in the Guild establish an advertising and promotion budget of between 10 and 30 percent of their gross income, and much of that advertising is in the design field print and online directories that prospective employers use. That sounds like a lot of money, but “if you earn $100,000 one year and decide to save that money instead of spending 10-30 percent on advertising, you won’t make $100,000 again.”

There is no rule-of-thumb sense of the percentage of one’s income that should be reinvested into advertising in the fine arts, but the concept of buying ads as a regular type of promotion is not foreign to some artists. “If I don’t advertise, how will people ever hear of me,” said artist Carl Borgia of Boynton Beach, Florida, a retired accounting professor at Florida Atlantic University, who spends $8,000-10,000 per year on ads in such publications as ARTnews, Modern Painters and Florida Design Magazine. “I have been pursuing art as a business for 10 years and applying the entrepreneurial skills that I have been teaching to my art.” Of those three publications, it has been the non-art one, Florida Design Magazine, that has resulted in the best results, which has included some sales and some requests to appear in shows at art galleries and art fairs.

That makes sense to Caroll Michels, an artist career coach in Sarasota, Florida, who recommends to her clients that they not “buy display ads in art magazines or on their websites. For the most part, the majority of art magazine readers are other artists, who are not in the market for buying other artists artwork. If you decide to purchase advertising space, select upscale consumer and interior design publications.” She noted that one of her clients had invested inherited money in “four full-page color display ads that ran for four months in Art in America. She said that the only response she received was from other artists who thought she was a gallery.”

On the other hand, Cushing, Wisconsin textile artist Jean M. Judd regularly places ads – usually consisting of an image of her work plus contact information – in art publications, including American Art Collector, ARTnews and The Crafts Report, spending $5,000-7,000 per year, or 15 percent of her total yearly income. These ads have resulted in “calls from dealers and commissions from art collectors.” Those commissions amount to one-third of her income, she said. “As long as I keep getting enough sales and commissions to keep me fully booked, I’ll keep advertising at the same rate.”

The principal reason she places ads is that she lives in a remote, rural area (“nothing but woods and fields”) and doesn’t have the time or means to bring her work to galleries in major cities. Advertising in national publications has brought people from distant states (“as far away as Arizona and San Francisco”) to her.

Certainly, many other artists have placed ads in these and other publications to no avail. “My ads in ARTnews have not directly brought in sales, dealers or collectors, so I cannot say they at this point pay for themselves,” said San Diego sculptor Maidy Morhous, who also has advertised in Laguna Beach Magazine, Art in America and in the catalogues published by various art fairs, such as ArtExpo and Spectrum Miami, with similar results.

Belief in advertising often leads to beliefs about how to advertise. Anatoly Dverin, a painter in Plainville, Massachusetts, stated that he only buys full-page ads, because “I don’t want to share the page with another artist; it creates competition. The other artist may use, I don’t know, some combination of red and blue that kills the balance of color in my painting.” People only start recognizing your name, said Andrew DeVries, if there is something else going on, such as an exhibition or an opportunity to meet the artist where potential buyers can go in person – “by themselves, ads can’t do it all.” Gail Wells-Hess, a painter in Portland, Oregon, claimed that certain colors and subjects were “guaranteed to sell” and should be included in ads, such as red poppies in Summer issues and “a pear or still-life in the Winter.” Both Bill Mittag and Jean Judd stated that strong, contrasting colors are the key.

The purpose and nature of advertising is a subject on which there is considerable disagreement, although there is one point on which everyone agrees: One needs to think of advertising as a long-term, rather than a one-shot, effort. To develop name and artistic recognition, the same or similar images must be present in ads that follow one magazine issue after another. Many artists split the costs of advertising with their galleries in advance of an exhibition, and some galleries carry the entire expense, but it is rare for a gallery to pay in full or in part to advertise an artist when there isn’t a show. If the concept is to keep one’s name and images before the public on an ongoing basis, one-shot ads are not likely to produce the desired results. Too, galleries generally have a local audience, and the advertisements they place are likely to be in local or regional publications rather than national ones.

Different gallery owners have their own purposes in mind when they place an advertisement in a newspaper or magazine, and they may not be quite the same as the artist’s. Most long-term, successful galleries rely on a group of collectors to purchase the bulk of the artwork they put on display, and the gallery owners notify this group privately well in advance of an exhibition’s start date: That is the reason a show may be wholly or partially sold out before it opens to the public. Few successful galleries get by on walk-in traffic, lured by a notice in the local newspaper, so there are usually other reasons that ads are placed. “Seventy-five percent of our sales come from our mailing list,” Sique Spence, director of New York’s Nancy Hoffman Gallery, stated. As a result, the gallery’s advertisements tend to be black-and-white, typeset and image-less, merely stating the name of the artist who will next have an exhibition and the dates of the show. “The ads we place are a reinforcement for the information sent out to our mailing list.” Certainly, advertisements may bring visitors into the gallery who may one day turn into buyers – of the particular artist in the advertisement or someone else. The ads may serve as a reminder to specific collectors on a gallery’s mailing list about the event.

“Advertising, especially advertising with illustrations, effects attendance, not so much sales,” said Bridget Moore, president of New York’s DC Moore Gallery. Other dealers report that ads with reproductions result in a number of telephone inquiries as to price and the availability of works, which also do not quickly translate into sales.

Taking out an advertisement, some dealers believe, also increases the chances of seeing a write-up of the exhibition in the particular publication. The ability to afford a large ad with photographic reproductions is seen occasionally as a sign of success, impressing artists and collectors. With other dealers, ads have greater importance for the long-term viability of the gallery than for the short-term exhibition. “An advertisement attracts attention,” New York gallery owner Thomas Erben said. “It secures the gallery’s position in the market. People have to see that we are still here. In effect, I’m advertising myself through the market.”

Yet another reason to place ads is purely psychological, according to Edward De Luca, director of DC Moore Gallery, since these notices “massage an artist’s ego,” that is, they let artists know that money is being spent on them and that, in turn, makes artists feel better about their relationship with the gallery. “Artists want to see their names in print and their work being advertised, and they ask us to have ads run in certain magazines.”

This Week's Worst Dressed List Is A Doozey

There were so many style lessons to learn from the fashion fails on this week’s worst-dressed list.

Italian socialite Eleonora Carisi’s “Clueless”-inspired outfit was, well, clueless. TLC singer T-Boz needs to embrace the phrase “less is more.” And Rita Ora should’ve called Rihanna for a crash course on how to look fabulous in a see-through ensemble.

Here’s a look at our top five picks for the worst-dressed celebs of the week. Do you agree?

T-Boz
tboz
Thou shall not over-accessorize is definitely the fashion commandment being ignored with this look. Had T-Boz simply ditched that body chain and those multi-strap shoes, she could have flown under our worst-dressed radar.

Eleonora Carisi
eleonora carisi
This looks like a horribly bad homage to Cher from “Clueless.” #AsIf

Rita Ora
rita ora
Ora didn’t get the see-through trend right. This look is far more hoochie than haute!

Li Bingbing
li bingbing
We love a great peplum, but we’re completely distracted — in a bad way– by the bright yellow bikini-inspired top of this gown.

Natasha Bedingfield
natasha bedingfield
There is entirely too much tulle going on with this skirt. And let’s reserve tutus for little girls and prima ballerinas.

This Solution For Feeling Tired Is Way Better Than Coffee

At 6 p.m. last Friday, I boarded a plane for Bangalore, India. At 1 p.m. Tuesday, I arrived back in New York after two days of meetings and traveling 34 hours across nine time zones. As you can imagine, I didn’t see much of Bangalore.

Isopod iPhone Case: Kill It with Fire!

Weird, gross, hair-raising. Those are three words that would best describe the Isopod iPhone case which has all the attributes of a phone case that I would never choose. Then again, everyone has different preferences so this might actually be something you’d want for your phone.

Isopod Phone Case 620x1004magnify

The case basically looks like a giant creepy crawly marine isopod, which is a crustacean with seven pairs of legs for crawling with a body structure that looks like a lobster tail.

The silver version of the Isopod Case costs $80(USD), while the gold version retails for $120. What’s more atrocious: the price or the design? I leave that up to you.

[via Geekologie]

The Best Chef's Knife

The Best Chef's Knife

After an extremely close voting round, the Wusthof Classic Cooks Knife has cut through the competition as your choice for Best Chef’s Knife. You praised it specifically for its durability, hand-protecting shape, heft, balance, and of course, sharpness.

Read more…


Meet Onionshare, the File Sharing App the Next Snowden Will Use

Meet Onionshare, the File Sharing App the Next Snowden Will Use

A small software app called Onionshare offers the most secure file sharing available. So why hasn’t anyone heard of it? Well, mostly because it was released with just a tweet from its creator, and you have to go to Github to download it. But don’t let its underground status fool you—this is a very important app.

Read more…