This Law School Grad Made A Serious Case For Pizza And Won!

This soon-to-be-lawyer made what will surely be her greatest appeal ever over humankind’s most basic freedom — her right to a piece of the pie. Pizza pie, that is.

In an email sent to HuffPost, this recent law school grad from New York explained that she visited the student lounge at her school in hopes of snagging a cheesy reprieve from studying. Though she graduated in May, she said she was entitled to the pizza through her activities fee that doesn’t expire until August. When she was turned away by a staff member, she fought back the only way a law student would.

In the witty email below, written to Student Affairs and titled “Since When Is Free Pizza Not Free Anymore,” the brave would-be Erin Brockovich fights for what’s right. Of course, her compelling case won her free pizza on the dean.

law school email

The law school grad wrote in the email above:

I’m a recent BLS alum studying for the bar exam, paid $100K to attend this school and $21 to the Dean’s Challenge, and was denied a slice of free pizza today from one of your staff members wearing a purple shirt today because he said the pizza was only for 2Ls.  Since when did free student lounge pizzabecome free for only 2Ls?!

Thank you.

To which the dean responded:

Hey- when can we grab a pizza on me?  Before or after the bar to celebrate?
Bring a few friends.

As thousands of sleep-deprived, stressed-out law school graduates took the bar exam this week, this interaction above proves that despite the potential of being jobless and in debt, a three-year, $100,000 education pays off in all the ways that matter — namely being equipped to plead your case for the silly most important things in life.

Like Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter

Harper's Bazaar's 'Iconic' September Issue Took 30 Years & One Ruined Chanel Skirt To Make

Ask any person who has ever worked on a highly anticipated September issue of a magazine and they’ll tell you: it’s no easy task. Editors start planning for the coveted glossy months — and in the case of Harper’s Bazaar — years in advance.

Women’s Wear Daily reported Thursday that the publication’s September edition will feature a spread of 16 “icons” (Cindy Crawford, Stephanie Seymour and Claudia Schiffer to name a few) and three separate covers, all completely designed by global fashion director Carine Roitfeld and featured in all 30 editions. “This is a portfolio I’ve been dreaming of wanting to do even over my 30 years in the business. You need a magazine that has big shoulders for such a project,” Roitfeld told WWD.

This marks the first time Roitfeld’s work will appear on the cover of Bazaar’s U.S. edition, and was put entirely under her control. Every decision — from the models, to the clothes, to the length of Lady Gaga’s Chanel skirt (which she cut herself to make shorter) — was in her hands. And the results are pretty epic. After all, anything that brings our favorite ‘90’s supermodels back together is kind of fool-proof.

We’ll have to wait until the mag hits newsstands Aug 19 to see the actual shoot itself, but for now, check out some of the covers and images and click here to see the entire portfolio.

bazaar

penelope cruz

cindy

lady gaga

iman

Arnold Schwarzenegger Thanks Fans For Birthday Wishes; The Internet Goes Bananas

When Arnold Schwarzenegger turned 67 on Wednesday, social media erupted with birthday wishes for the former Mr. Universe/The Terminator/Governor of California.

To thank his fans for their thoughtfulness, Schwarzenegger posted this video message on his social media accounts. (Bonus: He pulls out an old Terminator phrase that’s bound to make you feel all nostalgic.)

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

The short clip has gone viral this week, spreading like wildfire on Facebook, YouTube and Reddit.

Happy Birthday, Arnie!

Orbán Designs to Turn Hungary into 'Illiberal' State

2014-07-30-1520754_10152162288831093_13392069_n.jpg

It sounds like a headline from the European version of The Onion, but Viktor Orbán, months from winning a landslide reelection in April, announced over the weekend his intentions to turn Hungary into an ‘illiberal state,’ modeled after China or Russia, arguing that the 2008 financial crisis demonstrated that liberal democratic states aren’t competitive.

It’s hard to know just how seriously to take Orbán’s latest comments.

If his first government, over a decade ago, was traditionally liberal conservative, Orbán’s most recent term was marked by more nationalist, illiberal and authoritarian tendencies. It’s not hard to believe that, with a two-thirds majority behind him, Orbán could turn fully away from liberal democracy and toward illiberal authoritarianism in his third term, because Orbán (pictured above with Russian president Vladimir Putin) has been enacting illiberal policies for the past four years.

Other Hungarian commentators argue that Orbán’s emphasis was on the liberal market system and its failures during the global financial crisis. In that sense, Orbán may have been calling merely for a shift from a European social welfare state to a more state capitalist model. Though Orbán came to power as a liberal market proponent, his 2010-14 government engaged in healthy spending on public works programs, nationalized Hungary’s private pensions system and introduced the highest VAT rate in the European Union (27 percent) in a bid to end Hungary’s €20 billion post-crisis loan program with the International Monetary Fund. Nonetheless, even significant moves in that direction could spook global markets, send the Hungarian forint plummeting or dampen growth and investment.

Orbán’s weekend speech came as he, like Russian president Vladimir Putin, has called for restrictions on international NGOs throughout the country. Though Hungarians revolted in 1956 against Soviet rule and in favor of freedom and democracy in one of the most dramatic Iron Curtain revolutions of the Cold War, Hungarian relations with Russia today are arguably better than Hungary’s relations with leading EU member-states. Orbán, who burst onto Hungary’s political scene a quarter-century ago as an anti-communist activist, signed a $14 billion lending deal with Russia in January in pursuit of greater nuclear energy.

If Orbán goes through with plans to eliminate liberal democracy in Hungary, which has been a member of the European Union for a decade, it would cause an immediate crisis for the incoming European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker.

In the April parliamentary elections, Orbán’s feckless political rivals failed to stop him from winning another two-thirds majority that Orbán and his party, Fidesz, used between 2010 and 2014 to amend Hungary’s constitution and to push through new election laws. Fidesz now holds 133 of 199 seats in the Hungarian parliament.

Though the elections were conducted under new laws designed to maximize Orbán’s support, and though the state media and other arms of the Hungarian government are essentially under Orbán’s political control, even a united anti-Orbán coalition that included the center-left Hungarian Socialist Party (MSzP) and four smaller, like-minded parties commanded little popular support.

In his previous term, Orbán often clashed with leaders in the European Union, including European Commission president José Manuel Barroso and European justice commissioner Viviane Reding. Orbán’s government pushed through constitutional changes that undermined democracy, weakened Hungary’s judiciary and constitution court, and imposed other limitations to individual and press freedom.

In his first term as Hungarian prime minister, between 1998 and 2002, Orbán governed in coalition and pursued a relatively aggressive center-right agenda. Though Orbán then showed signs of the creeping authoritarianism that he now seems to embrace, including an attempt to limit meetings of the Hungarian parliament to just once every three weeks, he governed as a conventional, if firm, conservative.

In the May 25 European parliamentary elections, the Hungarian Socialists won even fewer votes than Jobbik, the far-right, nationalist, openly anti-Semitic, anti-Roma party, which won nearly 21 percent of the vote in the April national elections as well. Despite Fidesz’s appeal to older Hungarian voters, Jobbik and its telegenic leader Gábor Vona have made their greatest gains among Hungary’s youngest voters, a worrying trend. Though Fidesz has distanced itself (for now) from Jobbik’s most distasteful racial and ethnic rhetoric, it has often tried to blur the line between itself and Jobbik, which itself hardly embodies the spirit of a loyal opposition.

There’s no precedent for EU leaders to suspend member-states, but there is a mechanism that will give Juncker and other EU leaders, including German chancellor Angela Merkel and others, leverage against Orbán beyond EU subsidies — the suspension clause.

Added as part of the 1997 Treaty of Amsterdam, Article 7, as amended by subsequent treaties, allows the European Union to suspend a member’s rights, including its vote on the European Council, if it seriously and persistently breaks key EU principles — essentially, liberalism and democracy, as well as respect for human rights and the rule of law. Article 7 suspension requires a four-fifths majority of the members of the European Council (i.e., the leaders of the 28 member-states) and the assent of the European Parliament.

For now, it’s still unlikely that Orbán is willing to take the extreme steps that would bring Hungary so clearly into Article 7 territory. But it’s clear Orbán may not yet be satisfied with the constitutional changes he introduced earlier this decade and that he has more audacious plans for transforming Hungary in a direction that should be worrisome for both Hungarians and their European neighbors.

Kevin A. Lees is an attorney in Washington, DC and the editor of Suffragio.org.

The Anti-Semite Inside You

Liberals (and I am one) often comfort themselves by believing that they personally are far removed from the hatreds and discrimination of the past. We are aware of continued systemic racism and sexism, and, despite tremendous progress, know how much work there is left to do. On the other hand, they may not realize how they are responsible for the perpetuation of common prejudices, as we all are. I am currently most concerned that when it comes to Israel, the Jew of nations, liberals, including Jewish liberals are blind to their own anti-Semitism and their role in endangering Jews everywhere.

This is not a new problem on the left. My mother and author of The New Anti-Semitism (2003), Phyllis Chesler, has told me many times about anti-Semitism on the left and among feminists. When I asked her about this phenomenon recently, she said for those professing to fight racism “anti-Semitism is the only acceptable form of racism.”

Therefore, I suggest that in the same way we talk about internalized sexism and racism and homophobia we must talk about internalized anti-Semitism. The pervasiveness of prejudices ensures that we have internalized the messages we see about women and minorities. This may manifest in many ways, such as when women dislike gender non-conforming women, or when African-Americans uphold white-skin privilege.

It is the same with the Jews and the Jewish state of Israel. All people have internalized age old prejudices against Jewish people and it is revealed when the topic of Israel is raised, and especially when Israel dares to defend itself with physical and military force. This observation is not meant to shut down dialogue and debate about Israel. Rather, it is a call to be mindful of how internalized anti-Semitism plays a significant role in how we react to Israel’s actions, how we judge the Jewish state, and how we analyze the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.

Further problematic is that we have been fed a diet of myths about the creation of Israel, but also, to paraphrase French Prime Minister Manuel Valls, many liberals have no conscience of history, and hide behind an anti-Zionism that has intellectualized and rationalized anti-Semitism by dressing up old hatreds in scholarship. Perhaps because we hoped anti-Semitism would end after the Holocaust, some assumed it did end. As the chants on the streets of London, and Paris, San Francisco, Miami, and Boston, and the defamation on social media, as well as the hate from the mouths of world leaders are telling us loudly, this assumption is clearly wrong.

Internalized anti-Semitism encourages ferocious rage against Israel and Israelis, a level of rage expressed against no other people. It permits the viewing of Israel as uniquely racist and oppressive and evil, instead of being seen as ordinary or all too human. Even what I would call “soft” or “positive” anti-Semitism encourages double standards and unfairly heightened expectations for Israel which faces extraordinary challenges from an enemy lacking morality.

Internalized anti-Semitism also makes it easy for people to believe numerous fantastic modern day Blood Libels about Israel, such as the charge I have seen repeatedly (against all evidence) that Israel is committing genocide. This is no different than when people actually believed that Jews murdered God in the form of Jesus, drank the blood of Christian children, and caused the bubonic plague. Anti-Zionist movements have made this further acceptable by attempting to intellectually separate Jews outside of Israel from those within Israel, in effect saying it’s okay to hate these Jews over here or Jews who support them, i.e. Zionists. At a minimum, to repeat such modern Blood Libels as gospel truth is to recklessly support those calling for the genocide of the Jews, for who is more worthy of killing than a people who is “guilty” of committing genocide.

Empathizing with civilians in Gaza, promoting the creation of a Palestinian State, criticizing Israel’s settlement policy, its mistakes in war and peace, and its flaws as a society is not anti-Semitic. But, if you do the foregoing without learning about the history and context of Israel’s actions and those of its enemies, if you only question the right of the Jewish people to self-determination or endlessly seek to re-litigate the creation of the modern State of Israel, if you support an economic, academic, or other boycott of Israel but not of other countries you believe are violating human rights, if you seek moral equivalence between Israel and Hamas (a terrorist group whose stated purpose is the destruction of Israel and all Jews), if you presume Israel guilty of war crimes before investigations are made, if you believe Israel is uniquely evil or the root of all problems in the Middle East, if you believe in Israel’s self-defense theoretically but not in actuality, if you view this current war in Gaza as different from all other wars and the civilian casualties as different from other civilian casualties in war, you must ask yourself why. Martin Luther King Jr. would tell you this is anti-Semitism.

This piece first appeared on The Times of Israel.

7 Conservative Alternatives to the Internet's Most Popular Sites

7 Conservative Alternatives to the Internet's Most Popular Sites

ReaganBook—the hip, social-networkin’ conservative’s answer to Facebook that popped up not even a week ago—is dead. After being flooded with pornography and profanities of all sorts, the “Facebook for Patriots” was forced to shutter its doors. But don’t worry. There are still plenty of places where the internet-minded neocons among us can feel right at home.

Read more…



Why Everybody Wants to Buy T-Mobile

Why Everybody Wants to Buy T-MobileEveryone wants a piece of T-Mobile. First, AT&T came knocking in 2011. Three years later, Softbank’s Masayoshi Son, the Japanese owner of Sprint, expressed interest . Now, bolstered by a growing number of subscribers and CEO John Legere’s somewhat crazed antics, a French Telecom company called Iliad is making its play.

Read more…



Facebook's Internet.org app offers free web access in Zambia

We’ve heard quite a bit about Mr. Zuckerberg’s plans to bring low-cost internet access to the otherwise disconnected, and today, his social network announced plans to do just that in Zambia. The new Internet.org app allows users to browse weather,…

Boston's due up next on our Engadget Live tour!

Beantown, Titletown, Bahston or Bawston; whatever you call this strong Massachusetts city or how you pronounce it, we’re excited to be heading back there. On Friday August 22nd, we’ll head to Royale on Tremont St. at 7PM for our third Engadget Live…

Titanfall gambles with in-game market

getmoneyThis isn’t a bad memory of Diablo III. You’re not going to be trading your items for real cash in a market on Titanfall’s newest update (Update 5). Instead it’s a simple system in which you’re able to sell Burn Cards for credits and spend credits on Burn Card Packs and other oddities. It’s actually kind of neat. The newest … Continue reading