Vatican Editor Says Church Of England Vote On Women Bishops Threatens Anglican-Catholic Relations

VATICAN CITY (RNS) The Church of England’s vote to allow female bishops threatens unity with the Catholic Church, according to the editor of the Vatican newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano.

Giovanni Maria Vian, who is also a Rome historian, on Tuesday said the decision would have “an extremely negative impact” on steps to bring the churches closer together despite a positive meeting between Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby and Pope Francis a month ago.

“Clearly it’s a decision that complicates the ecumenical path,” Vian said in an interview with the Italian newspaper La Stampa published on Tuesday (July 15). “The problem is not only with Rome but also with Orthodox Churches, and that the Anglican Church is itself divided on the issue.”

After nearly 20 years of debate, the Church of England’s General Synod voted Monday to permit women priests to be ordained as bishops, overturning centuries of tradition in a church that has been deeply divided over the issue.

The Vatican newspaper made no mention of the issue in its Tuesday edition, and the Vatican’s chief spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, was not available for comment. L’Osservatore Romano is a semi-independent publication of the Vatican and rarely publishes anything that strays from the church’s position or teaching.

Sir David Moxon, the archbishop of Canterbury’s representative to the Holy See, said the Anglican and Catholic faiths enjoyed good relations, and Vatican officials had told him that collaboration would continue.

“We know there are differences, but what unites us is much greater than what divides us,” Moxon told RNS. “Relations between the archbishop of Canterbury and Pope Francis are cordial and respectful.”

Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, head of the Italian Bishops’ Conference, said the Catholic Church’s view on female priests was clear as “everyone knows what it thinks.”

The Church of England is the mother church of the 77 million-member Anglican Communion, which includes the Episcopal Church in the United States. Episcopalians were the first branch of Anglicanism to elect a female bishop, in 1988, and today are led by a woman, Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori.

Who Betcha? The Sociology of Sarah Palin

Sarah Palin has called for President Obama’s impeachment. “Enough is enough of the years of abuse from this president,” Palin wrote on a politically conservative website. “His unsecured border crisis is the last straw that makes the battered wife say, ‘No mas.'” To which my reply is, “Battered wives speak Spanish?”

Personally, I would hope a woman would leave her husband after the first assault, not after “years of abuse.” I would also hope Sarah Palin has read the Constitution. But, of course, after the Katie Couric interview, we’re still not sure what she reads.

According to Article 2, Section 4 of the Constitution of the United States of America, “The President… shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High crimes and Misdemeanors.” Perhaps Palin legitimately disputes the President’s handling of, oh, the border crisis. Regardless, even if Palin’s criticism of President Obama is accurate, her complaints are still irrelevant to the Constitution, which as Palin is well aware, was written by Jesus.

So, basically, Sarah Palin believes the most important, most powerful human being on the planet (not counting, of course, movie mogul Harvey Weinstein) should be removed from office because, well, I guess because she doesn’t like him. That doesn’t seem fair. I wasn’t a fan of the previous administration, but based on Constitutional law, that doesn’t mean George Bush should’ve been impeached or that Dick Cheney should’ve been exposed to sunlight. Impeachment is a big deal. People need to stop bringing it up every time they don’t like the guy in office. It makes you sound stupid.

And whenever Sarah Palin makes news for saying ridiculous things, that’s what the story is really about — not what she says, but who she is. People still like talking about Sarah Palin.

Some people hate Sarah Palin. Those people hate her way too much. Some people absolutely love Palin. Those people love her way too much. Palin just isn’t important enough to illicit such strong emotions. She’s simply a celebrity, one with no political power or economic authority. She’s the Justin Bieber of empty media chatter… unless you consider Justin Bieber to be the Justin Bieber of empty media chatter, which I don’t. Rather, I think of Justin Bieber as the Todd Palin of music.

It’s disconcerting to think there might be an extra level of hostility towards Sarah Palin because she’s a woman. But it’s probably true. Society has come a long way towards gender equality. Women have our support now… as long as they agree with us. Yes, we all like Jennifer Lawrence because she’s cute and harmless and she says funny things on the red carpet. Plus, she’s Katniss. But the true way to judge one’s tolerance is by their attitude towards women who fall outside of their own comfort zone. In other words, the moment you refer to Palin as a “bitch”, you lose your “my opinion of Sarah Palin has nothing to do with her sex” credibility. Palin doesn’t shoot wolves from a helicopter because she’s a bitch. She does it because she’s a jerk.

Senator John McCain was widely criticized for picking Sarah Palin as his Presidential running mate. I thought it was a good choice. She was attractive and unknown, she had a striking TV presence, and she wasn’t Rand Paul. If Rand Paul had any of these qualities, he might have a chance in 2016.

Sarah Palin is a media star. Accept it. Why is she so famous? I have no idea. But nobody can explain Ryan Reynolds’ popularity, either.

Sarah Palin rejuvenated the Republican Party. Because of Palin, a lot of ignorant, disinterested Americans started getting involved in politics. And that’s a good thing. Eh, it’s probably a bad thing.

I’m not ashamed to admit that I watched Sarah Palin’s reality show. I didn’t care for it — not because of any dislike I have for Palin, but because it was boring. I prefer reality shows with more hair-pulling. Actually, I found Palin very likable and engaging on the show. But there’s a limit to how engaging anyone can be while walking around the starting line at a sled dog race.

However, Palin’s daughter Bristol also had her own reality show, a sparsely-watched program called Life’s A Tripp. I enjoyed that show very much. I especially liked the sweet interaction Bristol had with her sister Willow. I know. You’re waiting for me to finish this paragraph with something snarky. But I got nothing. I just liked the show.

I think Sarah Palin will have a brighter future on television if she slowly phases into bipartisan issues. Not everything is political. During her Vice-Presidential nomination speech, Palin told the families of special-needs children that they would have a friend and advocate in the White House. I appreciated that line. Palin’s not in the White House, of course. But she could still be a powerful advocate for the disabled. Instead, in the past six years, when I’ve heard Palin make mention of special-needs citizens, it’s usually within the context of a biased political attack.

Palin is a slave to her political agenda. I mean, she even criticized the President’s Christmas card. Her message is “I disagree with whatever Obama did, is doing, or is going to do.” This isn’t a good career strategy; President Obama will be out of office in a couple of years. It’s like people who make their living as Judge Ito impersonators. Your time is running out.

Republican pundits tend to get lumped together as one giant talking hurricane of blustering doomsday predictions and fake-outrage, spewing its unwavering hatred of Obama as it advances across the country… though this has nothing to do with global warming and is simply a normal part of the earth’s insane weather patterns. But there are differences. Rush Limbaugh doesn’t care what his liberal critics think of him. Limbaugh’s show is not for them; it’s for his followers who worship him. On the other hand, Ann Coulter writes not for the people who agree with her nonsense; rather, she is playing to her opponents. Coulter knows what she is doing. She writes or says something outrageous and pseudo-shocking. The liberals freak out. They post angry, anti-Coulter messages on Facebook. And Coulter gets the buzz and the talk show bookings. But Sarah Palin is speaking consciously to conservative America. This is her intended audience. Of course, she isn’t saying anything particular original or clever. So her base, love her as they do, doesn’t really care what she has to say. They know what she is going to say before she even says it. Instead, Palin’s real audience is her detractors. These are the only people still listening to her… and loathing her. I’d bet that a typical Sarah Palin quote receives more interest among liberal blogs than conservative ones. Oh, and neither his fans nor his critics give a crap what Sean Hannity has to say about anything.

Sarah Palin is a symbol, not of Tea Party idiocy, but of liberal laziness. To mock Palin is easy. She relies on broad, black-and-white political strokes; “we support the troops and love America and the liberals want to increase your taxes and use the money to hand out free condoms to illegal immigrants.” It doesn’t take knowledge of the issues to point out Palin’s ridiculousness. All you have to do is write down what she said and then make fun of it. Hence, uninformed progressives use Palin as a crutch to feel good about themselves, and to compensate for their own lack of factual knowledge.

Why don’t liberals just ignore Sarah Palin? Because they don’t want to ignore her. They like not ignoring Sarah Palin. Sarah Palin is comforting. She’s familiar. She’s the Tea Party cliché that reminds us why we keep voting Democrat, even though our heart’s not really in it anymore.

But there are smart Republicans. Or, at least, there are Republicans who can debate an issue intelligently and with facts. I’ve met these people. There are ways to recognize them; sometimes they tuck their short-sleeve polo shirts into their shorts. And also, they sometimes know what they’re talking about. And if you don’t know what you’re talking about, these people will win the argument. And so it’s a lot easier to ignore them.

The thing with Sarah Palin is that her saying dumb stuff doesn’t make you smart. And mocking her just to mock her makes you a bit of a condescending a-hole… which, let’s face it, is a bit of a liberal cliché.

Sarah Palin is not a villain. She’s simply an opportunist, a benefactor of the “irrational outrage” movement that has polarized a section of the country so deathly afraid that Leave It To Beaver and John Wayne movies might not have been an entirely accurate portrayal of what life was really like back then. Palin has found her niche and she’s sticking with it. And, for now, she makes a lot of money doing personal appearances. Good for her.

Years from now, when we’re all living in floating houses and I’m 29, and historians access the Sarah Palin phenomenon, very little will be written about her short, uneventful political career or her silly Tea Party tweets. Instead, she will be tied into this era’s odd, obsessive fascination with meaningless fame. Hence, if I ever get a chance to meet Palin in person, I won’t challenge her about the “impeachment” comments. Rather, I’ll say, “Hello, Governor Palin. I’m a big fan. Would you mind taking a selfie with me?”

3 Simple Steps to Getting 'Unstuck' and Becoming Your Better Self

In the early 1980s, I participated in a self-empowerment seminar created by Robert Fritz, a former musician who drew from spiritual disciplines as well as principles of good management. The idea was to look at what’s swirling around you with fresh eyes.

One of the exercises featured in that course — which I’ve since used often in my own life — gave us a simple yet profound way of getting “unstuck” by telling yourself the truth.

The Tell Yourself the Truth (TYTT) mantra is the single most important secret to working through any problem that pulls you up short — a Whoa! moment. It might be something that takes you by surprise (a telephone call with bad news, a comment or action by a family member). It can happen in the middle of an argument you’ve had a gazillion times before. Or it might be a thought or problem that’s been brewing over time and is lingering on the edge of your consciousness. A Whoa! moment lets you know it’s finally time to face it.

The fact is, Whoa! moments don’t resolve themselves. However, you have the power to end pointless, repetitive and possibly angry discussions (with another family member or inside your own head!), dial down the negativity, and move on… if you take a moment to Tell Yourself the Truth.

TYTT has three steps:

1. Look around you. Put yourself outside of the action as a neutral observer.
What, exactly, is happening? What do you see? What do you hear?
What led up to this moment? Gather evidence about each of you, so that
you can act on what is. What were you each doing right before this interaction?
Are other family members involved, if only indirectly? If a decision
is looming large in your thoughts, is it really a matter of life or death–or
does it just feel that way?

2. Tell yourself the truth. Admit what is. Has a new element been introduced
that you haven’t factored in — a developmental change, other
people, other influences, the context? Is the situation really new, or does
this moment have a we’ve-been-here-before feeling? Might you have
seen it coming if you let yourself ? Could you have planned better? Don’t
focus on what you feel as much as why you feel it. Are you telling yourself
everything — your motivation, what you’ve contributed to the situation,
what it really means to you, and whether you have any control over it?

3. Take an action. Do something. It might mean starting or ending,
changing direction or doing it differently, getting more involved or letting
go. The goal is to figure out how to best cope with this particular reality
and to make a conscious choice. Do or say something that is true to yourself
and respects what you can give in the moment, but put the relationship
first. If you make a wrong move or a bad decision, you can always make
another choice later, but at least now you’re getting past “stuck,” which is a
bad and isolating place to be.

This might sound like a superhuman undertaking. But in the heat of the moment, the TYTT mantra inspires what Nobel Prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman calls “slow thinking.”

Our brains have two systems that guide our actions and reactions. The system responsible for fast thinking,” Kahneman explains, “operates automatically and quickly, with little or no effort and no sense of voluntary control.” In contrast, “System 2” is the part of our brain that accesses our wiser self. It involves taking deliberate actions, making choices, and concentrating.

It isn’t always easy to catch ourselves in the moment and change course. Even people who have been in therapy or have taken parenting or marital enrichment courses have a hard time calming down during a fight. Therefore, it’s best, of course, to tell yourself the truth before a serious Whoa! moment occurs — before you feel backed up against the wall, before either of you loses control.

If you practice telling yourself the truth on a regular basis and in everyday interactions, it will strengthen your better self, and it will become easier to make conscious choices that feed the relationship, even when things get out of hand.

The above post was adapted from FAMILY WHISPERING, co authored by Melinda Blau–better known as Dear Family Whisperer–and (the late) Tracy Hogg. It was first published online at FamilyWhispering.com.

Follow @MelindaBlau on Twitter. And if you have a family question for her, tweet it to: #DearFamilyWhisperer or email DearFamilyWhisperer@familywhispering.com. Real names will not be used, and no topics are off limits. Adults and children welcome.

Immigration and Dying 9/11 Ground Zero Workers

The fight over the Zadroga bill was viscerally ugly, with legislators screaming at the podium, and rightfully so: Some people were foolish enough to filibuster health care for 9/11 Ground Zero workers, and they received backlash from everyone from New York Republicans like U.S. Rep. Peter King to Jon Stewart. This is because everyone involved at Ground Zero, those who were there on 9/11 and those who toiled for months to clear our nation’s economic and cultural capitol of the wreckage of that day, were regarded as having done a vital service to their nation in the shadow of my generation’s defining tragedy. The ultimately watered-down Zadroga bill running out in 2016 is only one of the complications faced by hundreds of undocumented immigrants who worked to clear the still-smouldering wreckage at Ground Zero.

“Looking at Texas Task Force 1 standing at Ground Zero, going through that rubble and their heroism, themselves, they went there to save survivors, not to raise taxes,” said Kevin Brady (R-Texas), who tried to explain why those who had served at Ground Zero should not have the government pay for their health care. For survivors of Ground Zero work, this was treatment that they had almost become used to from the GOP: They grandstanded and fundraised on the backs of 9/11 victims, and on issues like a mosque being too close to Ground Zero being insensitive to workers and victims. Their filibuster successfully delayed desperately needed medical relief for these same victims.

“Many of us worked in the toxic smoke and dust,” explained Jose, an undocumented Ground Zero worker who spoke to me on the condition of not using his name. What he was working in was benzene from 90,000 tons of jet fuel; mercury from more than half a million fluorescent lights; 200,000 pounds of lead and cadmium from computers; crystalline silica from 420,000 tons of concrete, plasterboard and glass; and tons of other contaminants. Not only was the air they breathed highly carcinogenic, but the dust from the debris was literally cutting up their lungs as they breathed it.

These workers were out there with no protective gear because Christine Todd Whitman, an inept George W. Bush appointee to the EPA, as well as other members of the government, told these workers that the air was safe when it clearly was not. Since then, a Mount Sinai report has found that 70 percent of the almost 10,000 Ground Zero workers surveyed had new or worsened respiratory illness symptoms since 9/11.

When these workers predictably needed health care because of their exposure to toxins as a direct result of their work, the aforementioned political fireworks were sparked. Although many of those affected will need health care for the rest of their lives, the Zadroga bill is set to run out in 2016. Many of the illnesses associated with the breathing of the debris (such as various forms of cancer) will not manifest for over a decade.

“We are contaminated with the chemicals and burning bodies that were still smoking, and there are already members of my community diagnosed with serious illnesses,” said Jose. “We need health care because we don’t have it. We have access to Mount Sinai hospital, but the services are limited, and we have several health issues that are not being taken care of.”

In addition to the trauma and health effects suffered by all Ground Zero workers, and on top of the usual stresses of being undocumented (e.g., the threat of deportation), undocumented workers face unique challenges: “After 9/11, the undocumented asbestos workers lost their license because the law changed,” shared Jose, who explained how difficult it is trying to work while being undocumented and sick. “Because we don’t have status, we are not able to get a license, so many of us are sick and out of a job. We want to be able to adjust our status so we can get licensed and work again.”

“We didn’t care what the air quality was; we just wanted to work, to help our city and provide for our families,” said Jose. “We still want to work.”

While the Obama administration has announced that it has begun working to craft an executive order on immigration, there is still no clue as to whether or not this will benefit Ground Zero workers like Jose. If Obama does grant them relief, will the GOP fight back against assistance for 9/11 Ground Zero workers again?

EPA Union Protests Treatment Of Staff In Light Of Recent Controversies

WASHINGTON — The head of the largest union representing Environmental Protection Agency employees says agency leaders are showing a “failure to manage.” The top of the agency, the union leader said, has a “‘country club’ mentality” when it comes to dealing with top managers.

When problems are identified at the agency, American Federation of Government Employees Council 238 President Karen Kellen said in a letter to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy, “responsibility for those problems always flows down to the lowest level employee rather than staying with the manager who oversaw and presumably is ultimately responsible for activities within that organization.”

Union representatives, she wrote in the letter, “continuously see managers getting away with behavior that gets our rank and file employees suspended or fired.”

The letter comes after McCarthy testified at a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing in late June. Kellen expressed concern about some comments McCarthy made during the hearing about potential changes to civil service regulations that the union fears would make it easier to fire employees accused of misconduct.

The EPA has been criticized for several recent incidents, including the discovery in 2013 of a warehouse where contractors had set up “man caves” that included an exercise area and pinups. The agency also drew scrutiny when it was revealed that an EPA official had lied about being a CIA agent and bilked the government out of hundreds of thousands of dollars.

In the letter, Kellen says the “man caves” situation was a perfect example of a time that lower-level employees were suspended over the findings, while the head of that office was not disciplined. And in the case of the fake CIA agent, Kellen says, staffers were ignored when they tried to report his misconduct. And now it is lower-level employees, rather than managers, who are facing “additional layers of bureaucracy” in response to the situation, she said.

“Managers should be held to a higher standard because they are our leaders; they create the agenda and make the decisions,” Kellen wrote. “At EPA, the buck does not stop at the top; rather, it rolls down onto those least able to defend themselves and with the least say in decisions … Administrator McCarthy, we don’t need to make it easier to fire employees. You need to hold your managers and senior staff accountable for their behavior.”

EPA spokeswoman Liz Purchia said in an email that McCarthy “believes it is in the public interest to ensure that the Agency moves swiftly to initiate corrective action when any employee is found to have engaged in wrongdoing. However, she also takes very seriously the integrity of due process protections afforded to all employees in the case of removals and other disciplinary actions.”

“EPA holds managers and employees to the same high standards, and will address supervisors who engage in wrongdoing or fail to exercise due care in their oversight responsibilities as we would any other employee,” Purchia said.

Catch a Pikachu Burger at Japan’s Pikachu Cafe

As if Japan didn’t have plenty of Pokémon-themed products already. We can add another to that list. The official Pikachu Cafe is opening this weekend in Tokyo. There you can indulge in all kinds of Pikachu themed foods.

pikachu cafe2 620x465magnify

It will only be around for a limited time, so if you are in Japan, check it out. The Pikachu Cafe will serve up Pikachu-themed treats that look just like your favorite Pocket Monster. There’s Pikachu curry rice, a parfait with a Pikachu head and much more.

pikachu cafe1 620x464magnify

pikachu cafe 620x464magnify

If you wanna catch them all, you might get a stomach ache, but it will be fun to try. Pokémon fans will be in heaven. The exhibit opens July 19 and runs to August 31 at Tokyo View City. Tickets are 1,500 yen (~$14.80 USD) for adults.

pikachu cafe4 620x464magnify

pikachu cafe3 620x465magnify

[via Kotaku and Inside Games]

FCC Extends Net Neutrality Comment Deadline After Responses Crashed It

FCC Extends Net Neutrality Comment Deadline After Responses Crashed It

After an overwhelming surge in traffic the past few days that essentially crippled the FCC’s comment page, the Commission has decided to extend its deadline . Meaning you now have until Friday, July 18 to post your initial remarks—if you can get the site to work, that is.

Read more…



Shame Bathroom Slobs That Don't Wash Their Hands With This DIY Alarm

Here’s the deal: If you use a public bathroom for any reason, you need to wash your hands before you leave. Don’t try and debate it, don’t get defensive, just do it, or else you might be publicly shamed by this DIY alarm that lets everyone know your hands are probably a cesspool of disgusting.

Read more…



Nike's New Baseball Glove Comes Already Broken In

Nike's New Baseball Glove Comes Already Broken In

Nike’s new Vapor 360 fielding glove is specially designed to be used “straight out of the box,” according to Nike. Forget stashing it under your mattress for weeks until the leather loosens up—this glove is broken in from day one.

Read more…



FCC extends the deadline for comments on net neutrality until Friday night

The FCC asked for comments on its proposal for a new version of net neutrality — that sets up rules allowing ISPs to sell access to “fast lanes” — and the internet has responded loudly. Over 647,000 messages were received as of last week, and today…