NFL Players Get Shoulder Pad RFIDs

nflWhen it comes to the world of sports, you know for sure that winning plays a very important role, although it is not everything despite what many people think. The pressure to win has led some athletes to take short cuts – such as drugs and match fixing, while those who prefer the old school route would settle for hard work, plenty of training, psychology conditioning, and a little bit of luck when the situation to create history comes knocking on their doors. Technology, too, has helped athletes improve their game. Case in point – 17 NFL stadiums will make use of receivers as well as RFID tags integrated within the player’s shoulder pads in order to track one’s movement.

This is made possible thanks to Zebra Technologies’ location system, where such a configuration offers real-time position data for individual players, offering precise information on details such as acceleration, speed, routes and distance. This will be part of the next generation statistics for fans, and it makes sure that trading cards with statistics printed on them will not be all that useful these days, unless you are a collector.

Referees, too, will be making use of such tags as well, since it will also let the masses check out just how much ground coverage a referee does with each game.

NFL Players Get Shoulder Pad RFIDs

, original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Transgender Woman Raped At Immigration Center Should Be Released, Activists Say

By David Schwartz

PHOENIX, July 31 (Reuters) – Rights activists called on Thursday for the immediate release of a transgender women allegedly raped by her cellmate at an Arizona immigrant detention center, accusing authorities of refusing to provide for her safety.

The activists say immigration and detention center officials have shown they are incapable of protecting the 23-year-old woman following the alleged July 20 sexual assault at the Eloy Detention Center, southeast of Phoenix.

The woman, Marichuy, whose legal name is Jesus Leal Gamino, has been detained for more than a year at the 1,437-detainee center, which is operated by Corrections Corporation of America under a contract with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

“We see no other solution than for ICE to immediately release her, where her community can take measures to … help her heal,” said Francisco Luna, a spokesman for Arcoiris Liberation Team, one of the groups calling for the woman’s release.

ICE confirmed the alleged rape was reported and said the case was referred to the “appropriate authorities” for investigation. In a statement, it said it was committed to ensuring the safety and welfare of all those in its custody.

“ICE has a strict zero tolerance policy for any kind of abusive or inappropriate behavior in its facilities and takes any allegations of such mistreatment very seriously,” it said.

An ICE spokeswoman said the agency could not discuss the woman’s immigration case history due to privacy concerns.

A Corrections Corporation spokesman would not specifically comment on the case, but said its officials also take such matters seriously and investigate reported allegations.

“Any allegation of this nature is also reported to outside law enforcement so that an independent investigation can be conducted,” the company said in a statement. (Editing by Daniel Wallis and Eric Walsh)

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hits Back At Liberals Who Want Her To Retire

By Joan Biskupic

WASHINGTON, July 31 (Reuters) – U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has a message for liberals who have been saying the 81-year-old should step down while Democratic President Barack Obama is in office so he can appoint her successor: Who are you going to get who will be better than me?

Referring to the political polarization in Washington and the unlikelihood that another liberal in her mold could be confirmed by the Senate, Ginsburg, the senior liberal on the nine-member bench, asked rhetorically, “So tell me who the president could have nominated this spring that you would rather see on the court than me?”

Ginsburg, in a wide-ranging 75 minute interview with Reuters in her chambers late on Thursday, also acknowledged that President Barack Obama had invited her to a private lunch last summer at the White House. It was an unusual move, she conceded.

Responding to questions about whether Obama might have been fishing for information about possible retirement plans, Ginsburg said, “I don’t think he was fishing.”

Asked why Obama invited her, she said, “Maybe to talk about the court. Maybe because he likes me. I like him.”

“I don’t remember the specifics, but we did talk about the court,” she added.

She said she did not believe the president’s invitation arose from any pressure to retire before this November’s congressional elections, which could change the Senate from a Democratic to a Republican majority and make the confirmation of an Obama nominee more difficult.

The court is divided between five conservatives and four liberals, and many of the hottest social dilemmas are narrowly decided. They often come down to 5-4 votes, with the liberals sometimes prevailing as they are joined by centrist conservative Justice Anthony Kennedy.

Ginsburg was appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton in 1993.

Ginsburg’s future has been the subject of constant speculation, particularly because she has survived two serious rounds with cancer, in 1999 and 2009. She said on Thursday that she undergoes regular medical check-ups for cancer – a recent one showed no signs of trouble, she added – and works out twice a week with a personal trainer.

“Thank goodness I haven’t slowed down,” she said, asserting that she does not intend to leave the bench in the near future unless her health changes. She has previously told reporters that she wanted to remain on the court until she matches the tenure of Justice Louis Brandeis, who retired at 82 in 1939 after nearly 23 years on the court. As she nears that marker, she said she is taking it year by year.

Asked what she believed Obama might think about her future, she said, “I think he would agree with me that it’s a question for my own good judgment.”

Among those liberals who have called for Ginsburg to step down is Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California, Irvine, law school. He had asserted that only if she resigned this summer, before the November elections, could she ensure that Obama would be able to choose a successor who shares her views.

Ginsburg said on Thursday that even if she had retired, the president would have been more likely to have chosen a compromise candidate than a liberal.

Some liberals are further concerned that if she does not retire during Obama’s presidency and a Republican is elected as his successor in 2016, Ginsburg would end up being replaced by a conservative justice, moving the court even more to the right.

Ginsburg, who has been the high court’s senior justice on the left since the 2010 retirement of John Paul Stevens, has become a strong leader of that bloc and a robust voice for liberalism.

In passionate dissenting statements from the bench, she has challenged the conservative majority’s curtailing of federal voting rights law and, just in June, its position that for-profit employers can opt out of birth control coverage under federal healthcare law for religious reasons.

(Reporting By Joan Biskupic; Editing by Will Dunham)

The Discreet Power of Blogging Is Allowing Women to Express Their Expertise

By Cristiana Bedei, MA student at Goldsmiths, University of London

No longer simple online diaries, blogs offer a platform for women to find their voices as experts and opinion-makers.


Model Blogger (adaptation of “Model writing postcards” by Carl Larsson, 1906); Source: Mike Licht / Flickr under Creative Commons

LONDON, U.K–The media environment is mostly male-dominated. News is written by men and about men, and female journalists, experts and sources remain underrepresented.

Data show how media organizations–in the U.K. and the Western world generally–perpetrate a systematic marginalization of women, and an increasing number of them have turned to the digital sphere to claim a public space through personal channels, social media and blogs.

Blogging has often been praised for validating female voices, allowing them unprecedented freedom to publish original and unfiltered content, regardless of mainstream agendas and focuses.

“Women have been socialized to defer to men when it comes to expressing opinions. Blogging can be a powerful tool to counter that,” says Joy Goh-Mah, a London-based journalist and feminist blogger.

Goh-Mah says blogs are a great tool for social change and believes women are being heard in a way that has never happened before on such a large scale.

Having grown outside of the conventional media domains, the “blogosphere” does not respond to the established power structures in which women struggle to advance.

“In the past, the editor, the printer and the retailer came between the writer and the reader. And there was some discrimination against ‘women writers.’ Blogging has provided a forum for women to discuss what matters to them,” explains Alexandra Campbell, a journalist, prominent garden blogger and writing consultant.

Since the late ’90s, blogs have evolved from simple online diaries into powerful digital publications that shape public opinion about major topics and issues. Now recognized by the mainstream media, blogs are often integrated within newspapers’ websites and are regularly accepted as authoritative sources.

Blogs can promote women’s visibility, increasing their opportunities to participate in the news and move from the peripheral ranks to the centers of interest. As Campbell points out, “Online networks like Britmums and Mumsnet are now so powerful that politicians actively address them.”

Operating at the margins of the news system, bloggers may have the privilege of responding to their specific interests and setting their own priorities, but can their fringe practice challenge the lack of female sources, experts and reporters throughout the media?

With more than 30 years of experience as a journalist, Campbell is very familiar with print media and newsroom politics. She sounds skeptical: “Blogging isn’t going to help women get on an equal footing with men in a newsroom. Blogs are seen as a ‘soft’ lifestyle area. They’re not going to change much in terms of news coverage.”

Bloggers can also be affected by skewed perceptions of their work as the product of young, inaccurate and highly opinionated writers. Goh-Mah believes that dismissive prejudices and the nature of blogging as an unpaid and mostly female occupation contribute to an imbalance of power in favor of men–men journalists specifically. “This is not an ideal state of affairs,” she says.

Yet blogging can still represent an opportunity. “I suppose it is a good first step to getting women’s voices heard, and eventually centered in mainstream discourse,” she admits.

Now able to publish freely and develop a dedicated audience, women bloggers are more likely to gain confidence about their personal expertise, developing and exhibiting the skills necessary to build a career in journalism.

A successful blog attests to timeliness, good writing and promotional practice, establishing the most talented individuals as experts within their specific area of interest.

Debbie Djordjevic, a digital media expert, journalist and blogger, sees blogs as not only an easily available creative outlet but also as a showcase. The best bloggers prove themselves to be engaging writers, interacting with their audience at a greater level than many journalists do.

“Bloggers are multitaskers and have to take full responsibility for their content. Running a successful blog involves everything from writing to growing an audience, all valuable skills to journalists too,” she says.

Blogs seem to be the quickest way to gain writing experience and join the public debate, but the online environment may intimidate many new women writers. Under the scrutiny of a wide and diversified audience, women can become the targets of harsh–and often sexist and misogynist–criticism. The extreme death and rape threats directed toward feminists Anita Sarkeesian and Caroline Criado-Perez have revealed the disturbing abuse that women writers are exposed to.

Chayya Syal, a London-based blogger and journalist, has grown a following writing about racial and ethnic issues. She recalls, “I have received death threats and unsavory messages from older men who hate what I write about, especially if it’s to do with South Asian women. I have had messages from ‘Die, you fat ugly bitch’ to ‘Your family should be ashamed of you.'”

Having received hateful comments herself, Goh-Mah knows the inhibiting power of fear: “It can–as is the intended effect–silence women.” Her response, though, is about courage and trust, urging women to support each other and make a difference. “It’s so important for women to visibly and vocally support one another. Often this could be the determining factor as to whether a female blogger gains strength and confidence or is inhibited through fear of abuse.”

This story was originally published on studentreporter.org on 10th of July, 2014.

GOP Rep Says He 'Should Have Never' Grabbed Staffer's Arm In Capitol Hill Run-In

Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska) issued an apology Thursday after footage and reports of him aggressively grabbing a staffer’s arm began to circulate the web.

NBC producer Frank Thorp shared a short video of the run-in on Thursday afternoon. Thorp said the staffer tried to stop Young from heading into a House Republican meeting when the representative took hold of his arm.

Roll Call later released a photo of the incident. The photo’s caption claimed Young was attempting to enter the meeting through a side door, which is prohibited while meetings are in session.

Young said the individual was “unidentified” and physically blocking his path in a statement later Thursday.

“While returning to the GOP conference meeting to discuss the ongoing situation on our southern border I was caught off guard by an unidentified individual who was physically blocking me from reentering the room,” he said, according to Thorp. “Regardless, my reaction was wrong and I should have never placed my hands on the young man.”

'Being Gay Meant Sadness, Illness, and Death' (VIDEO)

2014-07-30-TomWicker2.jpg

I’m From Driftwood is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit archive for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer stories. New stories are posted on the site every Wednesday.

What was your first impression of the gay community? For Tom Wicker it was illness, death, and filth. Tom recalls an advertisement he saw when he was just 5 years old:

[I]t was of a stormy, volcanic landscape with lightning in the background and an enormous tombstone, which, I later learned, had the word “AIDS” written on it. I think for the best part of the first 18 years of my life, that was what “gay” was. It was sadness and illness and death.

As a teenager Tom had an experience that furthered his negative perception of the gay community: He encountered a man masturbating at a urinal:

[H]e reached over and grabbed my arm and then went to move me into one of the cubicles. And it was as if the spell had been broken, and actually then I was terrified. And I pulled away, and I went to leave.

These experiences led to depression and anxiety and a deep fear of contracting HIV, resulting in breakdowns, hospital visits, and obsessive screenings and testings for sexually transmitted infections. Tom was encouraged by friends and family to seek treatment in the form of therapy and medication, which ultimately allowed Tom to find what he had been lacking all along: gay friends and community:

Rather than see men as the things I wanted to have sex with and the things that would kill me, [I needed to] actually go out and see them as people. … In the end … the combination of the therapy and just seeing other gay men as people to talk to, to have a laugh with, and to be a part of community with made all the difference.

WATCH:

For more stories, visit I’m From Driftwood, the LGBTQ Story Archive.

The Wrestling Match Called Congress Moves To A Picnic Shed In Kentucky

PADUCAH, Ky. –- On paper, the U.S. Senate race here shouldn’t be a race at all.

The incumbent is Sen. Mitch McConnell, 72, a five-term powerhouse and the Republican leader in the Senate. He is in line to become majority leader if, as is possible, the GOP picks up a net of six seats in November’s elections.

His challenger is a relatively inexperienced woman not even half his age, running in a state with a Democratic governor, but also five of six GOP congressmen, two GOP senators (Rand Paul is the other) and a recent record of voting –- overwhelmingly –- for GOP presidential candidates.

Yet Alison Lundergan Grimes is in the race –- trailing by less than the margin of error. She has plenty of money, a first-rate campaign team and a folksy, combative personality perfectly suited to politics in the Bluegrass.

“A year ago, who would have believed that we would still be neck-and-neck with Mitch?” said Jonathan Hurst of the Grimes campaign.

The question now is whether the race will stay that way as it enters the campaign equivalent of the stretch run at Churchill Downs.

“We have built a modest but real lead and have the advantage on nearly every front as we close for the last 95 days,” said Jesse Benton, a close campaign adviser to McConnell.

Either way, Kentucky is the place and the race that may decide who controls the Senate -– and the atmosphere and the accomplishments of President Barack Obama’s last years in office.

Calculations vary, but Democrats desperately need to pick up a Senate seat somewhere, and Grimes still has a real chance of doing it here.

This weekend marks what amounts to the start of the race to the wire –- and as such it is now the epicenter of politics.

It’s an old-fashioned stump-speaking picnic called Fancy Farm.

Now that Congress is leaving D.C. for a month-long, dishonestly named “district work period,” American politics can lose the pretense of real legislating (there has been very little of it in Washington) and get down to some real eye-gouging.

This year -– any year, really — there is no better place for that then Kentucky, a feud-prone border state and ancient argued-over land the Cherokees called the “Dark and Bloody Ground.”

And in an election year, there is no better place for political arguing than an annual picnic here in the rural “Southern” -– that is, western -– part of the state, near Paducah.

Which means the Fancy Farm picnic, held on the grounds of the St. Jerome Catholic Church in Graves County.

Joining Gov. Steve Beshear, Paul and other pols, McConnell and Grimes will attempt to speak above the din of a raucous crowd in an open-sided farm shed the size of a basketball court.

Fancy Farm is electioneering at its most basic: A mix of down-home handshaking, crowd-working and attempts to speak over the shouts and rhythmic chants of supporters and foes.

The event is a blend of the House of Commons, a tobacco auction and the desperate din of a high school basketball game.

If you’re a candidate, the objective is to show your organizational clout, shake as many hands as possible, and keep a smile on your face at all times, in camera range and out.

This year, it’s also about dealing with the national media, which is descending on Kentucky in general and Fancy Farm in particular. They are drawn this year by the surprisingly close Senate race.

McConnell is counting on Kentuckians’ dislike of Obama –- the president’s approval is 28 percent in the state. He is targeting as well Democratic Senate Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, whose dour and resentful personality matches McConnell’s, and who presides over a U.S. Senate that, thanks in large part to GOP tactics, is as dysfunctional as any since the days of the Civil War.

Reid leads a national Democratic Party that is committed generally to reducing carbon emissions and therefore global reliance on coal -– a dwindling yet still popular and important industry in the far eastern and western parts of the state.

Grimes has tried to radically distance herself from national Democrats on the issue –- to the point of claiming to be a better proponent of the coal industry than her foe has been.

Recent polls show that McConnell has solidified his base among Republicans after a nasty primary battle with a tea party challenger. As a result, the most recent Bluegrass Poll shows him having taken a slim 2-point overall lead after a year trailing Grimes in the average of all polls.

Now, his side is attacking Grimes as an untested lightweight.

But McConnell is hardly home free.

A product of politics in the state’s lone big city, Louisville, he has never been wildly popular statewide. He won only one of his five Senate races by what would be regarded as a landslide.

Incumbents of any stripe are in danger this year, even Republicans in red states. The job ratings of Congress are at historic lows.

Nor is it always clear just how much “pork” McConnell has been able to haul back to Kentucky, especially since earmarks have been cut and the coal-based Kentucky economy has suffered despite his efforts in Congress.

Grimes for the most part has run a cautious campaign, incessantly touting a “jobs agenda,” her Kentucky cultural roots as a horsewoman and target shooter, and ridiculing McConnell as out of touch, ineffective and hard-hearted.

The McConnell camp has cautiously gained confidence in the last few weeks.

“Mitch has solidified his Republican base,” said Benton. “His image is improving as we remind people that he is a great advocate for Kentucky. The president is deeply unpopular, particularly with conservative Democrats.”

But Grimes will be fully competitive in TV advertising in the final months, and is pounding away on issues that most directly affect women, such as health care, pay equity and abortion.

She is going to need the best get-out-the-vote ground game the state has seen in recent decades if she is to pull the upset.

“The Republicans have spent $30 million and they haven’t knocked us out,” said Hurst, “and we are going to have that ground game. It’s going to be like nothing you have seen.”

It begins this weekend at Fancy Farm.

The Meaning of Terror

Imagine that you are a parent (as I am) and that your children are caught in a war zone, facing the prospect of death or maiming at any moment. What do you do? The answer is obvious: you remove your children from the war zone as quickly as is humanly possible.

This is why wars generate masses of refugees; the horrific civil war in Syria, to take but one example, created in 2012 alone over 700,000 refugees, scattered among Jordan, Turkey, Lebanon, Iraq, and other countries.

But if you are a parent in Gaza, where hundreds of children have died in the current conflict and over 2,000 have been injured, you have absolutely nowhere to go, with the borders sealed by Israel and Egypt and escape by sea or air impossible. You are trapped and unable to carry out the most elemental responsibility of parenthood: to protect your child. This is the true meaning of terror.

You have tried, of course, to do what parents do: to keep your child as safe as circumstances permit. But the task has proved impossible. You have rushed your family to sites such as the United Nations schools officially designated as safe havens, but they have been repeatedly attacked. The United Nations has reported at least six such attacks over the past two weeks, and many children have died as a result. There is nothing on earth you want more than to protect your children from harm, but you have nowhere to hide.

Israelis, too, feel a sense of terror. They are frightened of the Hamas rockets now capable of reaching two-thirds of Israel’s population and they are terrified of the tunnels that now reach into Israel proper. The situation, however, is not the same as in Gaza; Israelis have an expensive “Iron Dome” that intercepts many of the rockets launched by Hamas, an elaborate warning system, and an extensive system of shelters. But the most fundamental difference is that Israelis who find the situation too dangerous can leave with their children and take them out of the country. This is what makes the situation truly asymmetrical, and it compounds what is a great human tragedy for both sides.

The world has become accustomed to fighting between Israel and the Palestinians, and there has been a cumulative desensitization to the human suffering caused by the current conflict. The magnitude of the humanitarian disaster now unfolding is immense. Gaza has fewer than 1.8 million inhabitants, and over 1,400 of them are now dead. Were a similar catastrophe to occur in the United States, a nation of 316 million people, the equivalent number of deaths would be over 240,000. This is more than double the total number of deaths — 101,890 — suffered in the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, and the recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan combined. Or, to put it another way, in number of deaths per capita, it is 9/11 80 times over.

The response of the international community reveals a growing sentiment that Israel has lost its moral bearings. Ban Ki-moon, the normally mild-mannered UN Secretary General, described the recent attacks on a school in Gaza being used to shelter families desperately attempting to find a safe haven as “outrageous and unjustifiable,” adding that “Nothing is more shameful than attacking sleeping children.” And Pierre Krähenbühl, commissioner-general of the UN agency for Palestine refugees, described the attack as “an affront to all of us” and “a serious violation of international law by Israeli forces.” “Today,” Krähenbühl declared, “the world stands disgraced.”

For Israel, this is a moment of reckoning. Though its actions may succeed for a time in tamping down the military threat posed by Hamas, they further inflame the underlying conflict. In an article published on July 28, a former Israeli air force officer noted that in July 2002, a bomb in Gaza that killed the head of the military wing of Hamas aroused great moral outrage in Israel because it also resulted in 14 civilian deaths; now such attacks are routine and accepted with little public expression of dissent. This may well be explained by a recent poll conducted by Tel Aviv University, where just 4 percent of Jewish Israelis believe that excessive force has been used by the Israeli Defense Forces during the current assault on Gaza.

Faced with the unending possibility of attack, Israel is understandably concerned about its security. But its actions in the current conflict suggest that in the end its greatest threat may be to its soul.

Ted Olson and David Boies Talk Virginia Gay Marriage Win and More (AUDIO)

2014-07-30-HUFFOlsonBoies.jpgThis week I was invited to join a media conference call immediately following the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals’ favorable ruling in Virginia’s Bostic v. Schaefer marriage-equality case. The call was hosted by Adam Umhoefer, Executive Director of the American Foundation for Equal Rights (AFER), and included Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring; Bostic’s co-counsel, Ted Olson and David Boies; Gregory Nevins, Supervising Senior Staff Attorney at Lambda Legal; and James Esseks, Director of the Lesbian, Gay, Transgender and Bisexual Project at the ACLU. This marks the second positive ruling by a federal appeals court since last year’s historic Windsor decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. This historic decision represents a major milestone on the path toward universal marriage equality in this country, as the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court decision in Bostic v. Schaefer that found Virginia’s ban on marriage for gay and lesbian couples unconstitutional. The decision also paves the way for West Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina to strike down their marriage bans, since those states are under the jurisdiction of the Fourth Circuit. Maryland, the fifth state in the Fourth Circuit, passed marriage equality in January 2013.

The Virginia decision stated:

Civil marriage is one of the cornerstones of our way of life. It allows individuals to celebrate and publicly declare their intentions to form lifelong partnerships, which provide unparalleled intimacy, companionship, emotional support, and security. The choice of whether and whom to marry is an intensely personal decision that alters the course of an individual’s life. Denying gay and lesbian couples this choice prohibits them from participating fully in our society, which is precisely the type of segregation that the Fourteenth Amendment cannot countenance.

Ted Olson of the plaintiffs’ lead co-counsel stated:

Today’s decision stands as a testament that all Americans are created equal, and denying loving gay and lesbian couples the opportunity to marry is indefensible.

David Boies of the plaintiffs’ lead co-counsel added:

Today’s decision recognizes that marriage is one of the most fundamental rights — if not the most fundamental right — of all Americans. This court has affirmed that our plaintiffs — and all gay and lesbian Virginians — no longer have to live as second-class citizens who are harmed and demeaned every day.

LISTEN:

In November 2006 voters in Virginia amended their state’s constitution to define “marriage” as a union between one man and one woman and ban recognition of any legal status “approximating the design, qualities, significance, or effects of marriage” for gays and lesbians. Bostic was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in July 2013 on behalf of Tim Bostic and Tony London of Norfolk and Carol Schall and Mary Townley of Richmond, challenging the constitutionality of these laws on the grounds that they violate the equal-protection and due-process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This decision is a major step forward for LGBT families.

For more information on AFER, visit afer.org.

Listen to more interviews with LGBTQ leaders, allies, and celebrities at OUTTAKE VOICES™.

Download interviews on iTunes.

A Fly With Unique 'Ears' Becomes Inspiration For New Hearing Aid

Super-hearing fly inspires new hearing aidBiomimicry has again inspired a creative team of scientists. This time it’s the Ormia ochracea,
a tiny fly with exquisitely acute directional hearing ability, that has
become the model for the next generation of hearing aids being modeled
by engineers at the Cockrell School of Engineering at the University of
Texas at Austin.