Here's How To Wear The Sneakers Of The Summer

It seems like every time we turn around, there’s a new design collaboration that we can’t wait to get our hands on. And there’s pretty much nothing that gets more press than a pair of fresh sneakers, as Kanye West can tell you.

While we love the bright colors from Solange’s collection with Puma and Superga’s Versus Versace hue-tastic kicks, they tend to look like they’d be impossible to rock. But have no fear, there are ways to style ANY piece of clothing or accessory — always.

So, if you’re wondering how to rock your new pair of kicks that you maybeprobablyreally just spent your latest paycheck on, take a look at our styling tips below for a little inspiration.

Leave It To A Chef To Create A DIY Perfume We Can Eat

Food and fashion go hand in hand, at least for the editors here at HuffPost Style. So when we stumbled upon the Instagram account of Sunday Supper chef Laila Gohar, our hearts skipped a few beats.

The Egyptian cook’s flavorful food creations look just as awesome as her outfits. From her matte red lips (MAC Ruby Woo lipstick, of course) to her adorable turbans (she cuts African fabrics into head scarves to maintain her “erratic” hair), Gohar is one fabulous lady in the kitchen. It didn’t surprise us one bit that one of the chef’s best recipes has to do with beauty.

“I make a spritz of water and orange blossom flower and use it on my face as a toner, or just spray it all over as body spray. I even spray it on my plants! It’s such an amazing natural perfume. Traditionally, it’s used for Middle Eastern desserts like baklava,” she said.

Well, that’s all the inspiration we need to mix things up with our beauty routine!

The Most Indulgent Reese's Peanut Butter Cup Recipes For National Eat Junk Food Day

There are many ways one could chose to celebrate National Eat Junk Food Day — a holiday with unknown origins where you’re given the excuse to eat all the junk food your glutinous heart desires in one day. You could eat everything off of McDonald’s secret menu. You could devour the four new flavors of Lay’s. You could even make a bacon weave BLT. (This one you should actually do all the time.) But really, there’s only one way to do this food holiday justice, and that’s with Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups.

We’re not saying that you should go out and eat a Reese’s Peanut Butter Cup. No, that’s not indulgent or creative enough for National Eat Junk Food Day. We’re saying that when you eat a dessert on this day, you should put a Reese’s on it. Or make sure one’s been baked into it. Basically, just double down on dessert. Confused? This is how it’s done.




Want to read more from HuffPost Taste? Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest and Tumblr.

5 Things Not to Say to a Transgender Person (and 3 Things You Should)

2014-07-16-Unknown1.jpeg

1. “Hey, you! Have you had ‘the surgery’?”

This is kind of like someone coming up to you and asking about your vagina or penis. No, wait, it’s exactly like that. While there are some trans folks who are eager to start blabbering away about their nether regions, most of us consider our private parts, you know, private. Go figure.

2. “Do you love RuPaul? How about that Rocky Horror Picture Show?!”

It’s important to understand the difference between drag culture and trans reality. The former can be about performance, exaggeration, and entertainment; the latter is about people’s actual lives. Plenty of transgender people have begun their journeys in the drag community, and you will find many trans folks who adore all of the subversive, transgressive energy that drag can bring. But many of are uneasy when our lives are mistaken for “performance,” and it’s disrespectful to trans people to conflate the two.

As for Rocky Horror, here’s another delightful piece of subversive drag culture, made more enjoyably depraved over the years by the legendary participation of its audiences at the film’s midnight screenings. All of that is great. But remember that, while Frank N. Furter sings that he’s a “transsexual transvestite from Transylvania,” he’s surely not an actual trans woman any more than Al Jolson in blackface is actually Thurgood Marshall.

3. “So you must love that Judith Butler!”

OK, so plenty of transgender people love Butler’s groundbreaking work, which has to be respected for the way it brought the term “gender binary” (as in, “reject the gender binary”) into the vernacular (among other good reasons). But there are plenty of us who kind of sigh when we encounter a sentence like “If there is a sexual domain that is excluded from the Symbolic and can potentially expose the Symbolic as hegemonic rather than totalizing in its reach, it must be possible to locate this excluded domain either within or outside that economy and to strategize its intervention in terms of the placement.”

It’s worth remembering that for many trans people, our lives are not a clever academic theory but a daily struggle against violence and a difficult search for dignity and respect. If you’re talking to a trans person, make sure that you are thinking of them as an individual whose fight for identity is real, not as a person whose identity is some kind of scholarly abstraction.

4. “Can you can have an orgasm?”

Again, getting kind of personal with this one, aren’t you? Most trans people, post-surgery, are perfectly capable of orgasm, but perhaps it’s understandable if this isn’t the first thing folks want to talk about with a stranger. Author Kate Bornstein, in answering this question, playfully observed, “The plumbing works, and so does the electricity.” So, OK, the answer turns out to be The Hell Yes. But whenever someone asks me this question, I think of the story of the guy who kept asking his parrot, “Can you talk? Can you talk?” and at last the parrot says, “Actually, yes, I can talk. Can you fly?”

5. “You know who I feel sorry for? Your children.”

This is a classic way of being judgmental while pretending to be nonjudgmental. As it turns out, most trans people’s children are exactly as screwed-up, or not, as anyone else’s children. But it isn’t having a trans parent that affects children, either for the better or the worse. What damages children is other people treating their families with disrespect.

Three Good Questions to Ask a Transgender Person:

1. “How are you?”

By which I mean approach a trans person with exactly the same respect and open-heartedness with which you’d approach anyone else. In the same way that you wouldn’t begin a conversation with a stranger by inquiring about their race, their spiritual beliefs, or their politics, you probably wouldn’t want “So you’re transgender?” to be the first words out of your mouth. Many of us would rather not talk about what makes us different, especially with strangers. Many of us would rather talk, at least at first, about the things we have in common.

2. “Do you mind if I talk to you about some gender stuff?”

If you’ve established a rapport with a trans person and feel that the conversation has reached a point where Going There would be respectful, proceed with caution and see just how willing your new friend is to have at it. Most of us are happy to talk about the issues, at least in a general way, if we think we can do so in an atmosphere that feels safe.

3. “Are there books you’d recommend I’d read?”

When I first published my memoir, She’s Not There, a dozen years ago, there were precious few books that seemed to address our issues with much subtlety, or with any literary quality; that field was reserved pretty much for Kate Bornstein and her groundbreaking Gender Outlaw. Now there are lots of good books, by authors such as Helen Boyd, Jameson Green, Leslie Feinberg, and, yes, Judith Butler. I published a memoir of being a transgender parent this spring, Stuck in the Middle With You, as well as the updated anniversary edition of She’s Not There, which includes a new epilogue by my wife Deirdre Grace. Both of those books are available from Random House and other booksellers.

Two other recent standouts include Janet Mock’s Redefining Realness, the first transition memoir to also address issues of gender theory, not to mention the unique challenges faced by trans people of color like Mock. And the brand-new Trans Bodies/Trans Selves, edited by Laura Erickson-Schroth (and with an introduction by me), is a 600-plus-page resource guide from Oxford University Press, containing information on identity, love, transition, and politics, written by trans people for trans people.

Finally, your own Jenny Boylan has just published a new novella, I’ll Give You Something to Cry About (Shebooks). This novella tells the story of the Riley family, traveling from Maine to Washington, D.C., to see their young son perform “The Flight of the Bumblebee” at Ford’s Theatre. But most of the drama focuses on 16-year-old Alex, a teenager who has just gone through transition. This is the first time I’ve written a piece of fiction for adults about trans identity, and I hope readers will find Alex an inspiring character, giving life, humor, and dignity to the experience of trans men and women.

I should also mention Alex’s grandmother, Gammie, who is in the car as well. In the opening scene she looks out the window to see a group of chefs leaning against a wall. “What happened?” she yells out the window. “Somebody spoil the broth?”

For more information on Jenny Boylan’s titles, click here.

Spending $49 Billion On a 'Secure Border' Because of Tea Party Prejudice is Folly

2014-07-21-BORDERFENCE3.jpg

Aside from the thoughtful and humane analysis by Glenn Beck and Hugh Hewitt of the recent border crisis, conservatives have utilized this immigration issue to further the need for a “secure border.” Whereas Jeb Bush earlier this year labeled the desperate steps taken by illegal immigrants as “an act of love,” many in the Tea Party view the plight of refugee children at our border as an “invasion.” It is this sentiment that has fueled much of the latest GOP rhetoric. Ironically, wasting billions on a fence to protect us from people we employ in not only ludicrous, it makes a mockery of economic data.

According to a TeaPartyTribune.org article titled, Secure this border Mr. President, the GOP’s stance on illegal immigration can be found within the following words:

…deportation IS exactly the humane thing to do as these ILLEGAL now criminal children belong with their parents NOT as wards of our states paid for with our taxpayer dollars. These children were willingly sent by their parents to perpetrate a criminal act…in their name I might add…against our country for their own gain…and they need to go.

However, with a much needed reality check here, the building of a secure fence along the entire southern border has had its cost estimated at $46 billion to build, so you just know it won’t get done anytime soon as that would mean Obama would have to cut his freebie and handout programs to our future Democratic voters along with cut funding to the muslim terrorist groups that he so loves…and you know he will do neither.

First, as Jeb Bush accurately stated, illegal immigrants “broke the law, but it’s not a felony. It’s an act of love.” Crossing the border, contrary to the Tea Party rhetoric, doesn’t make you part of the Manson family. Technically, it’s a misdemeanor. Also, aside from omitting the names of the terrorist groups that Obama allegedly loves, the Tea Party article refrains from pointing out that hiring illegal immigrants is also a crime. For every “criminal” that crosses the border, there’s an American corporation or citizen who breaks the law and engages in a criminal act by hiring this person.

The Washington Post states that after the 1986 reform law (the same law Ronald Reagan provided amnesty to almost 3 million illegal immigrants), “employers found guilty of employing 10 or more workers whom they know to be here illegally could face up to five years in prison.” As for hiring individuals, American citizens face a $250-$2,000 fine per illegal employee for first time offenders and fines go up to $5,000 for the second offense. It’s odd that the Tea Party and other conservatives would go to great lengths to label people who cross the border as “criminals,” but never seem to mention the criminal acts (by citizens) that precipitate the initial crossing. Also, the original figure was $49 billion for the fence and maintenance costs, not $46 billion, but what’s three billion among friends?

Furthermore, most foreign invaders into a country aren’t asked to pick crops or pay taxes. The Tea Party rhetoric and platform fueling much of the GOP’s stance on immigration simply doesn’t correlate with economic reality. According to the Pew Research Center, there were 8.4 million unauthorized immigrants employed in the U.S.; representing 5.2% of the U.S. labor force, an increase from 3.8% in 2000. When examined from the point of view of certain states, another study by the Pew Research Center lists an even higher percentage of unauthorized immigrants as part of their workforce: Nevada (10%), California (9.7%), Texas (9%), and New Jersey (8.6%). Also, a report by Texas Comptroller Susan Combs, states “without the undocumented population, Texas’ work force would decrease by 6.3 percent” and Texas’ gross state product would decrease by 2.1 percent. Someone should notify Ted Cruz that these invaders are important to the Texas economy. In addition, Rick Perry should be informed that 9% of the Texas workforce is composed of illegal immigrants.

Also, the billions spent on an additional border fence and security would keep out the same people who are vital to the agricultural sectors of this country. The USDA has stated that “any potential immigration reform could have significant impacts on the U.S. fruit and vegetable industry.” The Department of Labor reports that of the 2.5 million farm workers in the U.S., over half (53%) are illegal immigrants. Echoing the Department of Labor and the USDA, agricultural labor economist James S. Holt made the following statements to Congress in 2007:

The labor intensive fruit, vegetable and horticultural sectors are already overwhelmingly dependent on foreign workers, the majority of whom are working in the U.S. illegally. The U.S. dairy, meat packing, and food processing sectors are significantly dependent on a foreign, and preponderantly illegal, workforce and becoming more so every year.

The reality, however, is that if we deported a substantial number of undocumented farm workers, there would be a tremendous labor shortage.

Pertaining to taxes, illegal immigrants according to the New York Times paid over $300 billion in taxes to Social Security, accounting for 10% of the Social Security Trust Fund. As for the costs imposed upon us by these human beings, the myth that illegal immigrants bankrupt cities and states is perpetrated by Tea Party voters, but isn’t rooted in fact.

The Congressional Budget Office in 2007 stated that “in the aggregate and over the long term, tax revenues of all types generated by immigrants–both legal and unauthorized–exceed the cost of the services they use.” The CBO findings and other data prove that the notion of illegal immigrants destroying the country is categorically false. Echoing this economic reality, UC Davis economist Giovanni Perri has stated that both legal and illegal immigration, “unambiguously improves employment, productivity, and income” for citizens.

Finally, illegal immigration has been down in recent years. According to Bloomberg, the “Pew reported that for the first time in 40 years, about the same number of Mexican migrants (legal and illegal) returned home as arrived, bringing net migration to zero.” Pertaining to the idea that fences and walls will protect us from refugee children or future farm workers, Princeton University professor Douglass Massey in SFGate.com explains a better solution to the issue:

Douglas Massey, a professor of sociology at Princeton University who studies the border and illegal immigration, said the government should spend its money differently.

“It’s a waste of money,” he said. “If you want to increase security, better to use some of that money for ports and transportation systems. If you want to lower the rate of Mexican immigration to the U.S., I would spend it on development assistance for Mexico.”

In addition, much of the Texas border is defined by rivers, and as one observer mentioned, “It is a winding river…”Where in the world are you going to put fencing? To propose that suggests ignorance of the border and the terrain.” As for stopping terrorists, a Bloomberg article in 2010 explains that of the “29 acts of terrorism that have taken place on U.S. soil in the past 25 years, none of the perpetrators entered the U.S. from Mexico.” Also, a border fence would do nothing to stop people who stay beyond their student visas (technically illegal immigrants) nor would it address the various underground tunnels used to smuggle drugs. The U.S. is the world’s largest consumer of illegal drugs, so kicking our drug habit would stop the flow of drugs to
this country.

To put things into perspective, the 2015 VA budget is $163.9 billion. Instead of bemoaning the tens of millions used to help desperate children at the border, why not utilize the billions for a fence and give this money to veterans? Of course, budgets represent value systems and the GOP has pandered to Tea Party xenophobia and nativism in order to appease its voting base. The prospect of spending over $46-$49 billion to protect Americans from people they hire is pure folly; a policy that adheres to nativist rhetoric rather than CBO, Department of Labor, or Pew Research data. While the Tea Party and other conservatives would bemoan money spent on food stamps for hungry Americans, the $46-$49 billion to protect us from people that make up 9% of the Texas workforce and over 5% of the U.S. labor force is a wasteful expenditure. Ted Cruz is wrong; illegal immigrants don’t come for amnesty, they come because Americans utilize their labor.

How Your Health Insurance Company Can Still Screw You, Despite Obamacare

No law has done more to reform health insurance and protect consumers against the industry’s most heinous practices than the Affordable Care Act. But Obamacare didn’t magically transform insurers into benevolent entities solely devoted to taking care of sick people.

Health insurance companies, even those that are not-for-profit, have to collect more money in premiums than they shell out in claims for medical care. That means they have a financial incentive not to pay for things.

And since health insurance companies can no longer shun the sick to maximize profits — either by denying coverage to people based on their medical histories or by rescinding the policies of paying customers who fall ill and rack up bills — insurers are employing other tactics to shift costs to sick people and make it harder to get health care, consumer advocates say.

“One of the things that occurred to me, even as the bill was working its way through Congress, was that once it was passed, insurers would do all they could to try to preserve profit margins,” said Wendell Potter, a former Cigna executive turned industry critic.

Here are a few of the tactics that consumers and advocates have complained about:

Refusing to pay for medical care that should be covered

Nothing in Obamacare says insurance companies have to pay any bill that comes their way. That’s fine, because doctors and patients want things all the time that are wasteful and unnecessary, and everyone shares the cost for that.

But it means the law doesn’t prevent stuff like this from happening:

Zoë Keating is a musician with more than 1 million followers on Twitter. Her husband, Jeffrey Rusch, had been diagnosed with cancer at the emergency room, hospitalized and given chemotherapy. The insurance company refused to cover it — until Keating told her story to a San Francisco television station, according to reports on KPIX.

While the Affordable Care Act beefed up patients’ right to appeal denials by insurance companies, people still have to fight, which is to the insurer’s advantage. “A lot of people just simply don’t understand their appeals rights and don’t appeal, or think that they just don’t have a chance of getting something overturned,” Potter said. “The insurance companies know that.” Most people don’t have a million Twitter followers, either.

Making patients pick up a bigger share of the bill

To keep premiums as low as possible, insurance companies are pushing more of the cost of actual care on to their customers in the form of things like high deductibles and “coinsurance,” which requires patients to pay a percentage of the cost of their care, instead of making a flat copayment.

restaurant check group
“Okay, Ashley, you’ve got diabetes, so you have to pay half the tab. Oh, and Brittany had a second glass of wine.”

And it’s virtually impossible to learn in advance how much medical care will actually cost, meaning patients are left in the dark.

“What this means for someone with cancer is that they may end up being directed away from a plan because they can’t find out whether their doctor is in the network, or whether the plan covers their drugs, on what tier and how much they have to pay out of pocket,” said Kirsten Sloan, senior director policy at the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network. Sending a cancer patient to a competitor would count as a win in the insurance industry.

Designing benefits to make the sickest patients pay more for drugs

Advocates for patients with serious medical conditions have been incensed by the practice of “tiered” drug lists, which have become a popular way for insurers to limit their expenses. Under this mechanism, the amount patients pay at the pharmacy is generally lower for cheap generic medicines and “preferred” brand-name drugs, higher for other brand-name drugs and higher still for the most expensive specialty medications.

health insurance obamacare
The good stuff is always on a high shelf. Almost got it!

High cost-sharing and top-tier status for drugs that treat ailments like HIV and multiple sclerosis are common in insurance policies bought via the Obamacare exchanges, the consulting firm Avalere Health reported last month. That looks an awful lot like insurers discriminating against sick people, the AIDS Institute claimed in a complaint filed against four Florida insurers with the federal government in May.

“Where we’ve seen the problems is putting every single HIV drug, including generics, on the highest tier, and that with very high coinsurance, like 40 or 50 percent,” said Carl Schmid, deputy executive director of the AIDS Institute. “There’s plenty of plans in Florida that don’t do this, and charge $10, $20 a copay for the same drugs.”

Limiting access to doctors and hospitals

Health insurance plans sold via Obamacare exchanges often have “narrow networks,” or shorter lists of medical providers that accept those plans than people with job-based insurance or Medicare might expect. Insurers need to keep costs down, and tough negotiating with high-priced doctors and hospitals can do that. This ends up saving the whole health care system money, including insurance customers.

The trouble is, when those networks don’t include enough of the specialty care providers that take care of the sickest, most expensive patients — like, say, cancer centers — it has the effect of denying care to those very sick people because they can’t get appointments.

health insurance obamacare
“Sorry, bro. Not on the list.”

“Insurers might try to avoid people with HIV or cancer or expensive conditions by avoiding the doctors that tend to treat those people, but otherwise their network looks robust,” said Karen Pollitz, a senior fellow at the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. “Whether it’s happening — no way to know yet.” The Obama administration and state regulators are poised to take action to compel insurers to beef up their networks, The New York Times reported.

Rolling out the red tape

To save money, insurance companies will be stricter about approving and paying for medical treatments, said Carmen Balber, executive director of the nonprofit organization Consumer Watchdog. “I have no doubt that claims denials or delays will be the new discriminatory tactic of the industry,” she said.

In Seattle, one doctor said she has to work harder to get treatments approved this year. “There are more hoops that the provider has to jump through,” said Grace Wang, the medical director of the International Community Health Services Holly Park Medical and Dental Clinic.

health insurance obamacare
“We’ll gladly pay your claim — after you perform a death-defying escape, Houdini.”

Wang returned to the clinic after Memorial Day weekend and attempted to follow up on a request she’d made to refer a patient to a specialist. The insurance company said her request already had been rejected because she hadn’t called back quickly enough.

“Their clock started ticking on Sunday. Monday was a national holiday, and so when 48 hours went by, they denied,” said Wang. “A conspiracy theorist would wonder.”

The X.pose 3-D Transparent Dress: Wearable Tech’s Strip Poker

The X.pose 3-D Transparent DressWorking on a similar albeit not such high tech premise as fairy-tale Pinocchio, whose nose grew when he told a lie, the X.pose dress becomes transparent when the wearer’s  personal data is shared online. Read on for more on this most bizarre wearable tech innovation.

Hasbro Is Cool With Fans Designing Their Own 3D-Printed Toys

Hasbro Is Cool With Fans Designing Their Own 3D-Printed Toys

The advent of online file sharing made it easy for anyone to copy and distribute media for free, and many feel—and fear—that 3D printing will eventually do the same for physical products. So it’s surprisingly refreshing to hear that a corporation like Hasbro has decided to embrace 3D printing, and will work with Shapeways to allow fans to design and sell their own toys based on the company’s properties.

Read more…



UK government weighs Tesla's Model S for its £5 million electric vehicle fleet

Despite costing £17,000 ($29,000) per car more than it budgeted, the UK government is weighing the purchase of Model S EVs for its fleet, according to Tesla. In an effort to go green, the UK said it wants to buy 150 electric cars for government…

Nothing says you're an Arsenal fan like buying a Huawei P7

It’s an exciting time to be an Arsenal fan, now that Alexis Sanchez has been bought with cash from new sponsors Puma and Huawei. The latter firm also wants you to show your support for all things Arséne by buying its latest handset, the Ascend P7….