John Kerry Condemns 'Outrageous' Gaza Truce Violations

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration on Friday condemned violations of the internationally-brokered Gaza cease-fire by Palestinian militants and said the apparent abduction of an Israeli soldier would be a “barbaric” action.

Secretary of State John Kerry denounced as “outrageous” a militant attack that killed two Israeli soldiers and led to the alleged abduction. Saying it was an affront to assurances to respect the cease-fire given to the United States and United Nations, which brokered the truce. He demanded that the militant Hamas movement that controls Gaza move to “immediately and unconditionally release” the missing Israeli soldier. “The United States condemns in the strongest possible terms today’s attack,” Kerry said in a statement released by the State Department as he was flying back to the U.S. from an official trip to India.

Kerry said he had spoken with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the developments, which led Israel to declare the cease-fire over. Kerry said it would be a “tragedy if this outrageous attack leads to more suffering and loss of life on both sides of this conflict.”

“The international community must now redouble its efforts to end the tunnel and rocket attacks by Hamas terrorists on Israel and the suffering and loss of civilian life,” he said.

According to Netanyahu’s office, the prime minister told Kerry that “Hamas has unilaterally and grossly violated the humanitarian cease-fire” and “will bear the consequences of their actions.”

Earlier Friday, the Israeli military said one of its soldiers was “feared” abducted just 90 minutes after the cease-fire took effect. Meanwhile, Palestinian officials said 35 Palestinians were killed by Israeli shelling.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest had called the attack and apparent abduction “a barbaric violation of the cease-fire agreement.”

___

Associated Press writer Mark Smith contributed to this report.

Jobs Growth. But Highway Bill Shows Austerity Still Hurts.

Today’s Bureau of Labor Statistics jobs report finds payroll employment increased by 209,000 in July, slightly slower growth than last month, and the unemployment rate ticked up slightly to 6.2 percent. Coming after this week’s GDP report that found the economy was actually growing in the 2nd quarter (an improvement over the negative growth in the first quarter), pundits are likely to continue declaring the the numbers are going in the right direction, but still failing to reach lift-off velocity after a long, sluggish and tentative start. Some argue that slightly higher unemployment levels are to be expected as an army of long-term unemployed Americans gain enough confidence to start looking for work again.

Many thoughtful economists are still cautioning that unemployment is far too high to start celebrating. Fed chief Janet Yellen is keeping interest rates low, Lawrence Summers is calling for a big expansion of infrastructure spending in order to achieve full employment, and Economic Policy Institute economist Josh Bivens warned on Wednesday, “Nearly half of the growth for the second quarter came from inventories piling up, which is not a reliable sign that the economy is going to grow faster going forward. Essentially, we made up some of the ground lost in the first three months of this year, but there’s nothing in (Wednesday’s growth) data to indicate that the economy is growing more strongly than it has for the past couple of years.”

Last night, at the very last minute, while House and Senate Republicans embarrassed themselves by failing to deal with the immigration crisis, the Congress was just barely able to pass a transportation funding bill before going home for a month. It was a small ($11 billion) short-term bill that will only continue funding of highway and mass transit projects through May 2015. But it prevents a major blow to workers in the construction industry that could have devastated the economy. The cobbled-together deal could easily have failed, and on Friday the trust fund would have been exhausted and federal money would have been cut off to major transportation projects all over the country.

In the debate over the highway bill, Americans were given a demonstration of the way conservative ideology and politics have held back economic recovery and, many would argue, sabotaged growth and job creation.

There was no excuse for this last-minute funding crisis. Congress has for decades regularly replenished the highway trust fund, usually by raising the gasoline tax. But today’s Republicans can’t countenance any tax increases.

A growing House GOP faction, modeling their thinking on Paul Ryan’s poverty plan, thinks the trust fund should be sent back to the states to administer, and many of them refuse to vote for any new transportation funding. Most conservatives are not even willing to talk about progressive taxation to pay for infrastructure. And even as this last-minute deal came together, officials at Heritage Action and other conservative groups continued to argue that failure to pass the highway bill would not harm the economy. While expert groups, like the American Society of Civil Engineers have urgently warned that America should be spending trillions of dollars on our critical systems, including roads, schools and airports, it is clear that conservatives are willing to block progress on spending that would just keep maintenance and repair going.

Of course progressives, many of whom lobbied to save highway spending, should be pleased that we didn’t go over the transportation cliff, which would have cost over 700,000 construction jobs according to the Transportation Department. But we should also remind our fellow Americans how conservative ideology, which opposes public investment as well as reasonable and progressive taxation, has crippled our economic recovery.

As the great recession threatened to spiral into a new great depression, conservative Republicans lobbied to water down President Obama’s economic stimulus plan, and then none of them voted for the weakened final product in the House (it won the vote of only 3 Senate Republicans). Americans should see this as economic sabotage.

Later in the President’s first term, when we should have been debating a second round of job-creating public investment, conservatives used the threat of refusing to raise the debt limit to force Obama to shift to deficit reduction. Together, they constructed a series of “fiscal cliffs” that succeeded in changing US fiscal policy from stimulus to contractionary austerity.

This graph from Goldman Sachs tells the story of how conservative budget cutting has undermined growth from mid-2010 through 2014.

2014-08-01-GraphimpactofFederalFiscalPolicyonRealGDP.png
Graph impact of Federal Fiscal Policy on Real GDP. Source: Goldman Sachs Research

As you can see, the impact of austerity on the economy is projected to be reduced over the next two quarters, but the next budget is not expected to be expansionary – and Republicans are still writing budgets under the mistaken conservative theory that spending cuts somehow stimulate growth. If the failure to pass a simple highway bill could bring us to the brink of losing 700,000 construction jobs, the attempt to negotiate the next full budget could really undermine our still-fragile recovery.

The big danger America faces is permanent stagnation – a slow-growth economy that never produces good jobs at the rate necessary to employ all the people who lost jobs during the great recession and the new entrants into the labor force. A real growth agenda would address America’s far more massive public investment needs. The $11 billion highway bill that just barely passed only prevents us from falling backward.

Harvard economist Lawrence Summers, who was President Clinton’s Treasury Secretary and President Obama’s Director of the National Economic Council, is worried about the economy. He thinks “a substantial step-up in infrastructure investment would serve all of our major economic objectives. It is as close to a free lunch as economics will ever produce.”

In a widely-read article in the Boston Globe, Summers declared:

There is increasing concern that we may be in an era of secular stagnation in which there is insufficient investment demand to absorb all the financial savings done by households and corporations, even with interest rates so low as to risk financial bubbles. Raising demand through greater infrastructure investment is an antidote for such malaise as well as a source of better employment and economic growth.

So while it is good that 700,000 jobs were not destroyed last night, America needs to be investing to create millions of jobs, not just to prevent the worst. And while strong majorities of Americans agree we should invest in infrastructure, jobs and growth, progressives also have to turn that support into an explanation that fingers the political actors who were responsible for our economic stagnation.

Conservatives have blocked every significant plan for investing in jobs and growth since the stimulus. They claim they have an alternative, but their program – conservative austerity – has so damaged the recovery it deserves to be called what it is: economic sabotage. Americans who care about economic growth and job creation need to call out conservative economic sabotage as it happens. So let’s take that responsibility seriously.

The July Jobs Report in Pictures

Today’s solid jobs report shows a labor market that’s moving in the right direction but still has a ways to go before everyone who wants to work has a reasonable chance of finding a suitable job.  Long-term unemployment (more than 26 weeks) remains a particular problem, and Congress dealt the long-term unemployed a harsh blow when it allowed federal emergency jobless benefits to expire prematurely at the end of last year.  Seven months later, long-term unemployment remains higher than when any of the previous seven emergency unemployment programs expired after previous recessions (see chart).  In addition, the share of the population with a job remains well below where it was at the start of the recession.

Payroll employment growth has picked up in 2014 and the unemployment rate has fallen faster than expected, but weak labor force participation and persistent long-term unemployment continue to plague the jobs recovery.

To be counted in the labor force, a person must have a job or be actively looking for one.  When jobs are hard to find, more people stop looking or stay home to care for young children, do home repairs, take courses at the local community college, or the like until job prospects improve.  These people are considered “out of the labor force” rather than unemployed. 

Over the past year and a half, the decline in the unemployment rate has been nearly entirely offset by a decline in labor force participation (the share of the population aged 16 and over working or actively looking for work).  As a result, the share of the population with a job has barely budged from where it plunged in the Great Recession.  Some of the decline in labor force participation reflects the graying of the population, with more Americans reaching retirement age, but economic research suggests that a significant share of it reflects weak demand for labor in a still-somewhat-sluggish recovery.

Since the start of the Great Recession, long-term unemployment has been much higher and more persistent than at any other time in data that go back to the late 1940s.  People unemployed 27 weeks or longer still compose roughly a third of the unemployed.  That’s down from a peak of over 45 percent in 2010, but remains higher than the pre-Great Recession peak of 26 percent in 1982 (when overall unemployment was 10.1 percent).  While the long-term unemployment rate of 2.0 percent is below the peak of 2.6 percent immediately after the 1981-82 recession, it’s still considerably higher than the 1.3 percent rate when federal emergency jobless benefits for that recession expired in March 1985.

People need to start returning to the labor force in greater numbers, and long term unemployment needs to fall much more before we can declare the labor market healthy.

About the July Jobs Report

Employers reported solid payroll growth in July.  In the separate household survey, the labor force grew moderately and the unemployment rate, labor force participation rate, and percentage of the population with a job all edged up.

  • Private and government payrolls combined rose by 209,000 jobs in July and the Bureau of Labor Statistics revised job growth in the previous two months upward by a total of 15,000 jobs.  Private employers added 198,000 jobs in July, while overall government employment rose by 11,000.  Federal government employment was unchanged, state government fell by 1,000, and local government rose by 12,000. 
  • This is the 53rd straight month of private-sector job creation, with payrolls growing by 9.9 million jobs (a pace of 187,000 jobs a month) since February 2010; total nonfarm employment (private plus government jobs) has grown by 9.3 million jobs over the same period, or 176,000 a month.  Total government jobs fell by 546,000 over this period, dominated by a loss of 308,000 local government jobs.
  • The job losses incurred in the Great Recession have been erased.  There are now 1.1 million more jobs on private payrolls and 654,000 more jobs on total payrolls than there were at the start of the recession in December 2007.  Because the working-age population has grown over the past six and a half years, however, the number of jobs remains well short of the number of jobs needed to restore full employment.  The pace of job creation over the past six months (244,000 jobs a month), if maintained, will gradually restore normal labor market conditions.  Even faster job growth would clearly be better, though. 
  • The unemployment rate edged up to 6.2 percent in July, and 9.7 million people were unemployed.  The unemployment rate was 5.3 percent for whites (0.9 percentage points higher than at the start of the recession), 11.4 percent for African Americans (2.4 percentage points higher than at the start of the recession), and 7.8 percent for Hispanics or Latinos (1.5 percentage points higher than at the start of the recession).
  • The recession drove many people out of the labor force, and lack of job opportunities in the ongoing jobs slump kept many potential jobseekers on the sidelines and not counted in the official unemployment rate.  This pattern was reversed in July as the labor force rose by 329,000.  That increase was composed of an increase of 131,000 in the number of people with a job and an increase of 197,000 people actively looking for one.  One shouldn’t read too much into one month’s data, but a rise in unemployment associated with an increase in the labor force is often a sign that people are coming off the sidelines to look for work.
  • As a result of the solid growth in the labor force, the labor force participation rate (the share of the population aged 16 and over in the labor force) edged up to 62.9 percent in July.  While the decline in labor force participation appears to have bottomed out, it remains at levels last seen prior to recently in 1978. 
  • The share of the population with a job, which plummeted in the recession from 62.7 percent in December 2007 to levels last seen in the mid-1980s and has remained below 60 percent since early 2009, was 59.0 percent in July, slightly above its 2013 average of 58.6 percent. 
  • The Labor Department’s most comprehensive alternative unemployment rate measure — which includes people who want to work but are discouraged from looking (those marginally attached to the labor force) and people working part time because they can’t find full-time jobs — edged up to 12.2 percent in July.  That’s down from its all-time high of 17.2 percent in April 2010 (in data that go back to 1994) but still 3.4 percentage points higher than at the start of the recession.  By that measure, about 19 million people are unemployed or underemployed.
  • Long-term unemployment remains a significant concern.  Roughly a third (32.9 percent) of the 9.7 million people who are unemployed — 3.2 million people — have been looking for work for 27 weeks or longer.  These long-term unemployed represent 2.0 percent of the labor force.  Before this recession, the previous highs for these statistics over the past six decades were 26.0 percent and 2.6 percent, respectively, in June 1983, early in the recovery from the 1981-82 recession.  By the end of the first year of the recovery from that recession, however, the long-term unemployment rate had dropped below 2 percent. 

Below are more charts that show how the new figures look in historical context.

Proof That 'Canada' Shirts Should Be Banned Forever And Eternity

So I’m 39 years old, been Canadian my whole life, seen a million T-shirts with the word ‘Canada’ written on them, and have somehow failed to ever notice this.

Is Green Investing Dead?

You likely have heard the stories of the bankruptcies of Solyndra, Fisker Automotive and Evergreen Solar, heard about the green tech funds on Sand Hill Road that just didn’t deliver and the less than rosy stock prices of clean energy companies that actually made it to an IPO … So is green investing dead? This was the question at the heart of a panel discussion at the Aspen Institute’s Action Forum and one that I am often asked. My answer is twofold, first, no, and second, it better not be — for humanity’s sake.

Human wellbeing depends upon earth’s natural systems for our food, fuel, clean freshwater, protection from storms, shelter, and yet our current economic system does not effectively value nature — either at all, or certainly at the level it is due. The White House just released a report on the costs of delayed action on climate change, estimating that “a delay that results in warming of 3° Celsius above preindustrial levels, instead of 2°, could increase economic damages by approximately 0.9 percent of global output” (approximately $150 billion in annual losses in the U.S. alone). Global energy demand is projected to require some $16 trillion in investment by 2030, and with climate change that needs to go largely to fossil-fuel-free energy sources.

Investment must rapidly flow to companies and projects that restore our natural system and optimize resource efficiency. The good news is that the companies and projects exist, and many with create great profit-making opportunities in the near- and medium- as well as long-term. There are newer companies like Tesla and “super-food” company Nutiva (they sell healthy foods from sustainable agricultural practices) whose growth rates by far exceed the average. There are also new business models enabling all of us to benefit from the green economy: from SunEdison (SUNE and TERP) and Solar City (SCTY) putting solar on our homes and businesses with no up front cost saving money on our power bills immediately and providing us free energy within a few years, to Mosaic who’s enabling crowd-funded investment to finance solar on military housing, churches and schools. Both community and utility-scale solar projects and solar funds are generating investment returns far above the rates of investing in the S&P 500.

Perhaps the business case for green can be made best by those who are in business: corporations large and small are saving money through energy-efficiency investments that pay back in as little as a few months, are innovating new planet-restoring business lines with strong profits, and are buying renewable energy to save money — when Wal-Mart is the largest corporate buyer of solar energy in the country, you know solar pays! Who else gets green investing? China. In 2013, China became #1 in new investment in renewable energy, #1 in new solar PV and solar thermal capacity and #1 in total renewable energy capacity! Oh and who bought Fisker Automotive out of bankruptcy? A Chinese company that is bringing that beautiful car back to market. This is a globally strategic industry sector that creates high-quality jobs fast, benefits economies, and is growing fast. China gets it.

Even where I live in Idaho with some of the cheapest power rates in the nation, the first utility-scale solar projects have just signed deals with our electric utility, and our local solar energy installer Sagebrush Solar brings solar hot water systems that pay home and business owners back over shorter and shorter periods of time, giving them free energy. Like Tesla with its loan from the U.S. Department of Energy, our local health food store paid back its U.S. Small Business Administration loan ahead of schedule. Demand for smarter solutions for our lives and for our planet — from energy to food — is growing far faster than the rest of the economy. And renewable energy technology costs are falling far faster than predicted, with solar PV costs down over 80 percent since just 2008! (See more great examples of restorative companies and projects from my friend, fellow Aspen panelist and solar legend, founder of Sun Edison Jigar Shah’s book, Creating Climate Wealth here.

The more we invest in these companies, projects and funds, the faster they will deploy and the more they will become even more profitable. Yet there are barriers in our system that prevent as much capital from flowing as it could and is needed. Our planet is getting hot fast, and resources are being depleted. It is long past time that we eliminated harmful energy subsidies ($500B/year estimated globally, $40B in oil and coal subsidies in the U.S. alone). We also need fair application of investment vehicles — if the oil and gas industry is able to use Master Limited Partnership investment structures to benefit their investors, then the renewable energy sector should be able to as well.

Yet the good news is that even now, in our distorted system, there are profitable opportunities to invest in restoring the planet, opportunities that can also benefit our country: in 2013 the number of solar jobs grew 10 times faster than the U.S. economy as a whole. So join me in moving more dollars where it will benefit our wellbeing now and in the long-term (and benefit our bottom lines!).

This blog post is part of a series produced by The Huffington Post and The B Team community to help articulate a Plan B for Business. To see other posts in the series, click here. For more information about The B Team, click here.

Sleep and Mood Disorders

Sleep plays a vital role in good health and well-being throughout your life. Getting enough quality sleep at the right times can help protect your mental health, physical health, quality of life, and safety. The way you feel while you’re awake depends in part on what happens while you’re sleeping. During sleep, your body is working to support healthy brain function and maintain your physical health. In children and teens, sleep also helps support growth and development. The damage from sleep deficiency can occur in an instant (such as a car crash), or it can harm you over time. For example, ongoing sleep deficiency can raise your risk for some chronic health problems. It also can affect how well you think, react, work, learn, and get along with others. (NIH)

For the past year, I’ve had chronic sleep problems. At first I thought it was a withdrawal symptom of coming off of the Seroquel. Seroquel is highly sedating, and I was on it for six years. If I missed a dose, I couldn’t sleep. In June 2013 I started not being able to sleep. So my personal psychiatrist increased my Seroquel dose from 600mg to 800mg (the highest dose possible). This is why I gained so much weight. I was tapered off the Seroquel in November 2013 because of the 52 pounds I gained. My psychiatrist replaced it with 5mg of Saphris, a relatively new medicine.

I was still having sleep issues. I had trouble falling asleep, trouble staying asleep and I woke up early. I was so tired at work. I would lay down during free periods. I even got special permission from my principal to come in late. For the last few months of the 2013-2014 school year I came in late one, two or three times per week if I didn’t have a first period class. I would fall asleep during our every-other-Thursday 7:45 a.m. faculty meetings. It was so embarrassing. I would be doing the “crackhead nod” — you know what I’m talking about: Your eyes can’t stay open, your head falls to the side, you jolt awake and catch yourself, repeat.

I told my psychiatrist and he prescribed Xanax. It didn’t help. He then prescribed Trazadone; that didn’t help either. I even saw a sleep specialist in January. He prescribed Lunesta, a sleeping aid. It worked 66 percent: I could fall asleep and I could stay asleep, but I still woke up early. I became resigned, figuring that this was my new sleep pattern. It really sucked.

When I was hospitalized in June 2014 I told the psychiatrist about my sleep issues. He said that according to old research it was thought that sleep issues caused mood disorders. Turns out mood disorders can cause sleep troubles. The classic chicken or egg situation. The reason I wasn’t sleeping was because I was depressed. And the medicines I was on wasn’t working on the depression. Once the depression ended I became manic. Once the mania was treated with Lithium and Latuda my sleep issues went away. The hospital psychiatrist prescribed Temazapem for sleep, but I no longer take it since I don’t have sleep issues anymore. And more importantly, I’m no longer groggy during the day. I don’t do the “crackhead nod” anymore. And I’ve only had three cups of coffee in the past two months! (I only started drinking coffee seven years ago when I was first medicated; my meds made me so groggy. During this past school year, I was drinking two or three cups of coffee per day.)

Safeguard your sleep. It influences so much of your day-to-day functioning. For instance, if I don’t sleep, I can potentially become manic or depressed. I am very protective of my sleep. You should be too.

When Business Etiquette Resembles a Competitive Dating Scene

2014-07-30-onlinedating.jpg

While sitting in a coffee shop in Manhattan, I overheard a conversation between two women that I suspect happens, on average, every three seconds in the world.

“It was a great date and he’s really cute…I could tell we were on the same page”

“When are you seeing him next?”

“Well I am not sure, he said he’d call, but it’s been 5 days, should I worry?”

I looked up and smiled empathetically, the scores of articles detailing how to figure out if he’s into you, flashed through my mind, and it took all the willpower I had to avoid standing up and suggesting she focus on something more productive.

Interestingly, what also stood out was how closely what she said resembled the exact conversation I had the night before with a former colleague who was job hunting. If you replaced the word ‘date’ with ‘interview’ and the word ‘cute’ with ‘nice’ it was basically the same conversation.

Men in Manhattan and successful businesses have a lot in common; both are spoilt for choice when it comes to potential candidates, so perhaps it’s not surprising that they behave in the same way. What then, should hiring managers and men keep in mind when they decide to turn a cold shoulder, stay vague or exhibit some important signs of commitment phobia?

What goes around comes around
Companies increasingly spend less and less time responding to applicants, and taking the time to communicate intentions clearly. Part of the problem is that now we have access to any company in the world simply by going online and can apply for a job within minutes. The same is true for date prospects, tens of dating apps and websites later — the options are endless. What this means is that the volume of applications has risen dramatically, and just like candidates have more options when they apply, companies or daters have more options to review, and so the potential for getting overwhelmed is huge. What’s more, it is now very easy to ignore an application, no awkward conversations needed, in an email orientated era, your message can be communicated easily with radio silence.

While companies may not recognize the value in keeping everyone happy by giving feedback, the availability of information in today’s world means that candidates can now talk to each other via reviews, job boards etc. about their experiences with certain companies, thus airing any dirty laundry to the masses. This may not seem like a major risk given the surplus of candidates, but as more and more people opt to open up their own businesses and economies pick up around the world, companies may want to reconsider what their reviews say about their hiring etiquette.

Effort can be measured quickly
A mid sized company I recently worked with reported 700 applications for one position, even though they hadn’t even advertised it online. They only closely reviewed 45. While the volume of applications may have been overwhelming, the problem with this equation is the sheer imbalanced effort being put in with effort being put out.

Let’s take a closer look by estimating the time it took on both ends:

Time in: [700 candidates] x [4 hours]* = 2,800 hours
Time out: [45 replies] x [0.25 hours]** = 11.25 hours

*The assumption here is that candidates spent time tailoring their applications.
**The assumption here is that the applications were read through and individual responses were sent out to either invite a candidate for an interview, or to reject the candidate.

What happens in a dating scenario is very similar, when considering time spent getting ready, with follow up text messages about the date sent afterwards:

Time in: 5 hours***
Time out: 0 hours

***Includes both people, sorting out logistics, shopping and preparing for the date.

How to make the process a little more human
While I am not suggesting that companies put in 2,800 hours into replying to every applicant, I am suggesting they take a hard look at how they can even out the equation, and at the same time be considerate of an applicant’s time. The same applies to dating, while a follow up text being candid about whether or not you want to see the person again, may be very difficult to write, and shouldn’t take five hours to compose, the message is the same.

Ultimately though, one needs to remember that we are humans dealing with other humans, and applying for a job, just like going on a date is a moment of nervous vulnerability that should at least be honored with a courteous response. The beauty of today’s world is that nowadays there is probably an app for exactly that: link it to the list of applicants, and there we have it, the solution to being a little more human, could lie in just a touch of a button.

It's Time To Share Some Photos Of Your Pit Bulls

We’re almost at the end of HuffPost Pit Bull Week, a time to celebrate the happy, slobbery dogs and bust the misconceptions surrounding the breed. We’ve asked you what your pit bull means to you, and we’ve heard from thousands of loving pit bull parents, but now, we want to see your pups in all their adorable glory.

Add your pooch to the slideshow below, and tweet us photos @HuffPostGreen using the hashtag #PitBullWeek — we’ll retweet some of our favorites!

HuffPost Green is launching a week-long, community-driven effort to bust the myths and raise awareness about pit bulls, a maligned “breed” that often bears the brunt of dated, discriminatory legislation that can make it near impossible for these dogs to find a forever home. You can follow along with HuffPost Pit Bull Week here, or on Facebook and Twitter where we’ll be using the hashtag #PitBullWeek.

Let Gratitude Guide Your Pain

Waves of gratitude and awe have been flooding over my body recently. The waves come unexpectedly and only last for a passing moment. This is a novel experience for me but one well received as this has been a hard year for me — the hardest.

Some pain has been acute, however much of it is chronic. Pain always lurks — I’ve accepted that it probably always will — at least to some degree. But that’s OK, pain is not our enemy.

I’ve always liked pain, and challenge, and the triumphant feeling of an AND1 play.

pain = action

Allen Iverson always used his pain to fuel his passion, but pain is a raw energy that becomes hard to discipline over the long term — at least that’s my experience.

Let me tell you a personal story from this past weekend which paints the message im trying to share: I hate losing more than I love winning. So this weekend after losing a couple initial games of basketball it made me give even more of myself.

However, as my morning hoops dawned into the afternoon and I evened the series I decided to finally listen to my aching body. The usual dehydration of playing ball in the sun was setting in. This time I knew it was going to be bad. And it was.

Within just a couple hours I was retreated to my bed to hideout in the dark. I drank water and tried to withstand the pounding pain of my head. Every slight movement hurt. And then I felt sick. I’ve never felt nausea with a migraine before. However, before I knew it, I projectile vomited all across my bathroom. Luckily it was mostly water. But it was devastating. Dry heaving is the worst. Especially when you have a migraine and are completely sober to experience it all.

I eventually got to sleep and woke up at sunrise for an important meeting. But then i hit unexpected construction traffic — there was only one damn lane to get across Golden Gate Bridge, and I knew I had f*cked up. All of my going at 100 mph the day and months before caught up to me. I was now late, sick from the night before, had a busted finger and I had no one to blame but my self. I had spread myself to thin, lost my composure and dropped the ball in a working relationship that was equivalent to championship game to me. It sucked. I could have simply blamed it on murphy, how was I to avoid the traffic… but it was my fault.

After messing up this important meeting I realized I needed to make a change — I needed a comeback. I told myself, “I need to focus better, get to simplicity and do work!” However, I realized that I could not use my pain as a source of energy here — I needed a more discerned energy.

I realized that if we are going to have longevity — if we are going to have consistency, we need to run on more than pain alone. And repetition is the mother of all skills. It’s everything. So we need this. We love Kobe because we know he trains harder than anyone else — even when he loses, we don’t hate because w know he did work. He gets our respect.

Consistency is challenging to master not because it is necessarily hard, but because it takes being fueled off something new besides pain and aggression to achieve it. We are so use to pain and aggression it can be hard to use anything else as motivation. Yet consistency demands us to use gratitude to guide our pain.

Gratitude helps us to do the small, tedious, and mundane day-to-day activities with full engagement — to be in flow. Flow is the psychology of optimal experience, when we perform and feel at our best. But flow is actually a subjective experience that is only partly dependent on objective conditions — flow is more dependent on simply how engaged we are with life ( the good and the bad).

So while pain helps us explode, to power lift, to go to war; it doesn’t empower us to achieve long-term and consistent success and well-being.

Pain pushes us like the wind does to a sail. But gratitude is the rudder that points our ship in the direction of it’s destiny.

Gratitude = consistent successful action.

The Best Barbecue Sauces You've Never Heard of, from Europe

2014-08-01-sauces630x407.jpg

“A well made sauce will make even an elephant or a grandfather palatable,” observed the nineteenth century French food writer, Grimod de la Reynière. Strange dude, Grimod: he had webbed fingers, like a duck, and he once staged his own funeral just to see who would come. He would have been a blogger today.

A sauce has the power to transform the simplest grilled seafood or chicken into an event. I’ve already told you about regional American barbecue sauces and the sauces of South America. Today, we look at some of the best grilling condiments you may have never heard of: the barbecue sauces of Europe.

Salsa Verde (Italy): Don’t confuse this one with Mexico’s tomatillo-based sauce of the same name. Italy’s venerable salsa verde (“green sauce”) includes all the components of a good vinaigrette, and more: freshly chopped Italian flat-leaf parsley; olive oil (the best and freshest you can afford); fresh lemon juice and grated zest; minced garlic; chopped capers; hot red pepper flakes; and those little umami bombs of the Mediterranean, anchovies (optional). Use as a marinade, baste, or sauce for grilled seafood, chicken, veal, pork, lamb, or vegetables. For the best results, make your salsa verde no more than two hours before serving. (Tip: Whisk the lemon juice and zest into the sauce at the last minute to preserve the parsley’s bright green color.) Get the recipe here.

Romesco (Spain): This gutsy red puree of roasted tomatoes, garlic, onions, olive oil, and fresh and dried chiles thickened with bread and ground nuts may be the most famous sauce in Catalonia. Smoke-scented and earthy, romesco pairs well with all manner of grilled seafood, poultry, and meat. But the sauce’s highest purpose is as a dip for calçots, Catalan spring onions (they resemble large scallions or small leeks) charred over grapevine fires and served in bunches on terra cotta roofing tiles. In Spain, romesco is traditionally made with smoky dried ñora chiles–the same chiles used to make Spanish paprika. You can buy the chiles online (and for a limited time, Oregon-grown calçots as well) from La Tienda. You can substitute dried ancho or pasilla chiles, which taste similar and are more readily available. No surprise here, but I always char the vegetables and toast the bread and nuts on the grill before making the sauce. See the full recipe.

Read about two more irresistible sauces from Germany and France on BarbecueBible.com.

SIGN UP for Steven Raichlen’s UP IN SMOKE newsletter to learn more about barbecue!

READ MORE ABOUT GRILLING AT BARBECUEBIBLE.COM

Steven Raichlen is the author of the Barbecue! Bible cookbook series and the host of Primal Grill on PBS. His web site is BarbecueBible.com.