The 18 Style Hacks That Every Dapper Man Must Know

Since the dawn of time, men have wrestled with one important, weighty question. Even our caveman forebearers would roll off their sleeping rocks, stare at their collection of pelts, and wonder:

“What me wear to work today?”

While our grammar may be slightly better, the question remains. If you’re stumped by the sheer number of outfit choices, don’t worry, we’re here to help. Lucky for us all, we evolved past the all-formal days of yore, and entered a bold new age of cool casual. We partner with Dockers®, a company that knows a thing or two about effortless style for men, and found ways to help you dress smart — whether you’re heading to the office or just having people over to the man-cave.

Move the Denim Upstairs

cool hand luke

As a general rule, it’s always appropriate to dress like Paul Newman. That’s especially true when he wears denim, which is classic, rugged, and too good to stay solely on your nether regions.

Although Justin Timberlake’s crime against fashion and/or humanity set back the denim top for years, we’re happy to report it’s back. The great thing is how versatile it is. Unbutton a bit, combine with khakis and boots, and you’re ready for manly adventures — like climbing an active volcano or grappling with a bear! If you’re in the office, though, you can still dress it up with a dark, solid tie and a snappy gray blazer.

Just, please, avoid jeans and shirts of the same shade.

HACK IT:
Washing your denim can ruin that perfect color. Don’t do it. If you notice people refusing to stand downwind of you, stick your shirt in a freezer to kill smelly bacteria.

HACK IT:
If you’re still smelly, a bit of distilled vinegar in the last cycle of the wash will keep the true color.

HACK IT:
For all button-down shirts, you’ll need to know when to tuck. If your shirt ends are long in front and back, and short and curved along the side, stuff that shirt down your pants. Now.

Blaze(r) of Glory

blazer men

Sure, every man needs a dark suit for those special occasions. But your constant companion, your conversation starter, your go-to style piece — that’s the blazer. The gray, charcoal, or blue blazer is perfect for desk work, but put some plaid under it and you’re equally ready to chop down a tree. Pick a tweed number for the coolest-Englishprofessor-on-campus look.

Just make sure it fits perfectly. The jacket’s shoulder should align with yours.

HACK IT:
Stand with your side up against the wall. If the shoulder pad touches the wall first, the jacket’s too big.

HACK IT:
You’re a man; measure things with your fist. If your jacket fits properly, you should be able to squeeze your fist in the gap between your jacket and stomach.

HACK IT:
This is one piece you’ll want to take everywhere, so you need to know how to pack it. Folding it from the inside out will protect it from wrinkles.

Pick Your Power Tie

dude in tie
Once upon a time, the tie symbolized corporate conformity, as synonymous with office life as the typewriter and the timecard. Now, the tie can be anything you want — even, dare we say it, a little rebellious.

You have a lot of choices out there, so we’ll go ahead and say, “treat yo’ self.” Buy a bunch. But if you’re looking for the one tie to rule them all, go with something dark and solid, or with a very subtle pattern. It’ll look respectable with anything you match with it, even brighter, busier patterns like a gingham or plaid. Plus, if you dress it down — by throwing a leather or jean jacket over your dress shirt, for instance — your dark tie will look punk.

HACK IT:
Here’s a fashion commandment: thou shalt tie your tie so that it reaches your belt buckle. (Any longer and it comes dangerously close to pee range.)

HACK IT:
Tie width matters too. 2 and ½ inches is considered a modern cut, but, no matter what, it should be in proportion to your lapels. The wider they are, the wider your necktie can be.

HACK IT:
Got a collection of ugly ties? You can always turn it into a beer koozie.

Don’t Neglect the T-Shirt

man in tee shirt

The lowly, forgotten t-shirt. Too often it is relegated to lazy Sundays lounging around the house (although, admittedly, it is perfect for that.) Don’t sleep on the T-shirt, though, because, with the proper fitting and color, it can become office-ready.

Not every t-shirt is created equal, of course. The decades-old t-shirt you got at that death metal concert, for instance, should probably be kept under house arrest. But a well-made shirt in white, heathered gray, blue, or even purple will look sophisticated with the right blazer or cardigan.

HACK IT:
Shoulders make the T-shirt, too. The seam that separates sleeve and body of the shirt should fall right at the corner of your shoulder.

HACK IT:
Because no one wants to see your buttcrack, keep it at a respectable length. Your t-shirt should fall below the middle of your belt and above the middle of your zipper.

HACK IT:
Fight shrinkage. If you find that your t-shirt shrank in the wash, soak it in a bath of hot water and hair conditioner for five minutes, then stretch it back.

The Power of Pants

pants

With all due respect to the kilt (its day will come), a man is defined by the right pair of pants. Jeans are a great start, but the dapper gentleman must expand, must master a bevy of britches. Your versatile outfit might include a slick pair of green chinos, the classic grey worsted wool slack, or the irrepressible khaki. (Dressing like Indiana Jones, we remind you, is not, nor will it ever be, wrong.)

No matter what you go with, though, the fit has to be impeccable. Your pants should be snug around your thighs and hips, but not tight. They need to cover a respectable amount of that no-man’s land between navel and buttcrack, while ending high enough on the ankle to show most of your shoe. We recommend a quarter break.

In other words, like the love of your life, your pants should hug you — but never, ever cling to you.

HACK IT:
One quick way to tell if a pair of pants will fit your waist: throw an elbow. As it turns out, the length of an arm from elbow to fist is roughly the size of an average man’s waist.

HACK IT:
Sometimes a zipper gets stuck — usually right before that big presentation. Fix it easily by rubbing the teeth with a pencil. Graphite acts a makeshift lubricant.

Keep Your Belt Subtle

belt

Look, we’ve all had that temptation to buy that monstrous, shiny belt buckle. But you’ve got to fight it, man! A belt is meant to keep your pants up, not weigh you down.

So cast your belt in a subtle (albeit stylish) supporting role, not as a star player. It should be a quality leather, and should match your shoe color and finish. You’ll probably need both black and brown at some point. If you’re dressing up, make sure your belt width and clasp size goes down.

HACK IT:
Belts may look tough, but they need love too. Hang your belt vertically and away from direct light. (Coiling it can crack the leather; sunlight fades it over time.)

HACK IT:
The right sized belt has a few inches of leather to the left of the buckle after fastening — enough to reach the first belt loop, but no more. Err on the side of shorter.

Whatever You Do, Wear the Right Shoe

desert boots

Nothing can sink your smart outfit quicker than an ugly pair of shoes. And nothing can make your feet smart as much as an uncomfortable pair of shoes. The stakes are high — shoes, after all, make the man.

While we could write all day about our sneakers and dress shoes, the best solution is always the boot. It’s manly, sturdy, and versatile. It works well in the mud or in the executive bathroom. There are plenty of styles to choose from, but consider the classic and comfortable desert boot. It pairs smartly with your khakis, chinos, and jeans, and it will never — we repeat, never — go out of style.

HACK IT:
Consider this the anti-hack: although some sites suggest using olive oil to shine your shoes, don’t. Olive oils make leather temporarily supple, but resurface later as unsightly oil spots. Try shoe conditioner on leather instead.

HACK IT:
If you went with a nice chocolate or tan suede boot with your khaki, we salute you. A fun trick to clean suede is with stale bread crusts, which soak up stains and oils.

Why The Fight For Maternal and Child Health Is A Race Against Time

When we entered the delivery room of a small hospital in rural Malawi, our eyes went immediately to the two newborns lying side by side. They had been placed on a small warming table, a simple device found in some health centers where no incubators are available. My two colleagues and I gazed at the babies, each wrapped in brightly colored cloth, while a nurse explained that they were both fortunate to be alive. The stronger and larger of the two had been born the night before and had not been able to take his first breath. Happily for this newborn and his parents, the midwife who delivered him had recently been trained in neonatal resuscitation and knew exactly what to do to save his life. The other tiny baby had entered the world at 28 weeks, much earlier than the full 40-week term. Her survival was not yet certain.

Memories of those newborns were top-of-mind for me when many colleagues and I participated in events surrounding the United Nations General Assembly last week. World leaders discussed climate change and Ebola as well as the world’s progress towards achieving the eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) established by the United Nations and member states in 2000. As of today, there are fewer than 460 days left to achieve these goals before the deadline of December 31, 2015.

Why do these goals still matter? They are important because literally millions of lives are at stake. In 2013, nearly 3 million babies died in their first 28 days of life, another 2.6 million were stillborn, and 289,000 girls and women died from complications during pregnancy and childbirth. These numbers are staggering. It is impossible to imagine the impact of these deaths on families and loved ones, and on entire communities where maternal and newborn mortality rates are highest.

For generations, Johnson & Johnson has cared about the health of babies, their moms and their families. In 2010, responding to the United Nations Secretary General’s global call-to-action, our company committed to help accelerate progress on MDG 4 (reduce child mortality), MDG 5 (improve maternal health) and MDG 6 (combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases). Our MDG commitment is clear and measurable: reach 120 million women and children a year by 2015.

In 2013, working in over 65 countries, this work reached more than 80 million women, children and newborns. Working with trusted partners, many of whom work on the ground with the most vulnerable mothers, infants and children, we are focused on five areas where we can help drive significant improvements: making childbirth safer for mothers and babies; treating and preventing intestinal worms in children; researching, developing and delivering new medicines for HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and other diseases; eliminating mother-to-child transmission of HIV; and delivering vital health information to new and expecting moms via mobile phone.

The most vulnerable mothers, infants and children need our steadfast, collective commitment through 2015 and beyond. Despite the efforts of governments, UN Agencies, NGOs, foundations, health care associations, academic institutions and private sector companies, maternal and child health will remain the “unfinished agenda” of the MDGs. The most inspiring voices I heard in New York last week were those of young people advocating for this issues. Their passion and energy was evident in speeches, on panels and in social media, and they re-energized our shared commitment.

Together we must ensure that women’s and children’s health and survival remain at the forefront of the global health agenda. We cannot move on before we complete the work begun at the start of the new millennium. Families and communities everywhere will be stronger because we do.

From Los Angeles To 50 St. Catherine's Drive: Chats with Dennis DeYoung and RJ Gibb, Plus a Tim Fite Exclusive

2014-09-29-41QIaz8QhL.jpg

A Conversation with Dennis DeYoung

Mike Ragogna: Sorry, I’m having some issues with my recording software.

Dennis DeYoung: [singing] “The problem’s plain to see, too much technology.”

MR: Yeah, looks like that helped, Mister Roboto!

DD: Little did I know technology would ruin the entire music business.

MR: Hey, dude, it’s time to get into “Dennis DeYoung And The Music Of Styx Live In Los Angeles.” Woo-hoo!

DD: Let’s go there! Everyone come on down to LA, we’ll have some fun! Oh, we already did it, didn’t we.

MR: Dennis, what were some of your favorite moments from that night?

DD: When I said, “Thank you, good night!” and it was over and nobody had fallen off the front of the stage and no blood was let.

MR: Ahem…any musical moments?

DD: Oh, musical moments! Here’s the thing: When you’re on that stage and the camera’s zooming in on you and you’re recording live and you know that it counts, what you’re really doing is you’re in the moment but you’re praying that every note you sing and every note you play is going to be the best of your lifetime and through it all you have to smile and look like you’re having a good time. I know McCartney said in an interview recently what I’ve said for years when they ask you that question, “What’s it like when thousands of people are screaming and applauding and you’re on that stage?” I’m thinking about the next note so I don’t screw it up. If you’re really worth your salt as a performer you really care desperately about every performance. It’s like an attempt to be the very best you can be in that moment. So when you’re doing it for a camera that thought in the back of your mind that’s always there is, “Don’t screw up, goofball!”

MR: I imagine that’s something many, maybe every entertainer feels.

DD: I’ve said for a long time that performers are fifty percent unabashed ego and fifty percent total insecurity. Those two things are clashing all the time. You can’t get anywhere in show business without a distorted belief that you’re really good. You hear this all the time from all performers, somehow in the back of your mind, you’re certain you’ll be found out. That’s really the makeup of people who are willing to go in front of others and say, “Hey folks, here I am, judge me,” right? That’s what we do.

MR: The other part of that is that whoever all of the people are in the band, they have a certain amount of creativity where they can’t do anything else. Ego may be involved in how successful the band becomes, but it still seems like there’s no choice in the matter. It’s either this or nothing. No?

DD: Here’s how I’d explain it to you. There’s a piece of opera–and I could use examples from rock music but I use this one because it’s in a foreign language, Italian. My mother spoke Italian, but I don’t speak Italian. It’s an aria by Puccini called “Nessun Dorma.” Every time I hear it, I have to control myself from weeping openly and I have no idea what the words are literally. I have some idea. But somehow, those notes with the human voice against those chords elicit an organic response in me that is undeniable, and that is why I do what I do. Because music moves me in such a way that I have to be part of that. It’s been that way ever since I can remember. So if you’re asking me what sets me on this course, it’s “Nessun Dorma.” It could be something else, but I choose that because it’s not even in English, for God’s sake.

MR: I’ve never interviewed you, so let’s go back to your musical roots. Who were your influences and what put you on a path either as a solo artist or with a band when you were younger?

DD: Now remember, I’m sixty-seven, so when I started taking musical lessons in 1953–God forbid–there wasn’t even any rock ‘n’ roll. I played accordion because my mother was Italian and it was the law. So I had the accordion, my nextdoor neighbor Giorgio Rudzinski who turned out to be my confirmation Godfather who was like twelve and I was seven, he was Polish and he had the same problem. His mother made him play accordion, so I just thought it was the coolest thing. Listen, if you’re a kid and you look at an accordion and you don’t know a thing about rock ‘n’ roll and everything that follows and the coolness factor, the accordion looks pretty cool. It’s shiny, it’s got a bunch of buttons, it’s moving, the bellows go in and out, it’s a thing! You know? So I started on accordion and of course I spent a lot of years perfecting my talents only to have the electric guitar come in and ruin everything and make accordion players not only obsolete but also the center of ridicule. So this is how my life began.

What I did was eventually, I taught myself to play electronic organ. But what happened in 1962 was I was walking down the street in my neighborhood, it was hot, it was in August I think and everybody’s windows were open because nobody had air conditioning in our neighborhood in 1962 and I heard music coming from the Ponazzo brothers’ house. So I went up on the front porch and there was John and Chuck Panozzo, they were twelve and I was fourteen and they were sitting there playing with another kid, an accordion player. They weren’t a band, they were just three kids that were forming around, and the accordion player had only been playing like six months, but I was intrigued primarily by John the drummer. So the next day I said, “You guys bring your stuff over to my basement, I play accordion but I haven’t played in about a year, but I’ll drag it out.” I had played for about eight years so I was pretty good. We went down to my basement and that day we formed the nucleus of Styx.

The three of us stayed together really until 1999. Of course John died in ’96. But that’s how the band was formed, and we were just playing out of fake books, standards from the thirties, forties and fifties, not rock ‘n’ roll–remember we hadn’t even seen the Beatles yet–so we were just playing weddings and birthday parties and anniversaries and that kind of stuff. Then we saw the Beatles. And I saw them like so many other people that first night and my life was changed forever. I said, “That’s it guys, we’re going to do that. That’s what we’re going to do.” And that’s when we started to replace guitar players and go toward a rock ‘n’ roll band. But right around 1968 was when J.C. officially joined the band and then James Young joined in 1970 and the original nucleus of Styx was formed in 1970. That’s when the original five members came together for the first time. Now four of us–the Panozzo brothers, myself and J.Y.–all ended up at Chicago State University in Chicago and that’s how the band got together. The three of us were still in a band and then we met J.C. in college and then we added J.Y. in ’70.

MR: Now, let’s talk about the hits since that’s basically what your new project is all about. Dennis, there are two groups now–the group called “Styx,” and there’s Dennis DeYoung’s band doing Styx. If you’re a Styx fan, what are you supposed to make of that?

DD: Go see Journey.

MR: [laughs] Nice.

DD: If you want to hear all of the hits from A to Z, which is what this DVD is about, get the DVD. I purposely set out to make a DVD that in my mind played every worthwhile Styx hit that not only the diehard but the casual Styx fan would want to hear in a concert. If I was going to a concert and I was a fan I would want to know all the songs that I’ve come to know and really appreciate. That’s what I do. What the other guys do is a little different, but that’s what I do.

Listen, if you went on the blogs, the fan base was fractured in 1999, that’s obvious. People took sides, and that’s a very unfortunate thing. That, to me, is the worst part of all of this. I never thought for a minute that the fan base would ever have to line up in one camp or another. It just never occurred to me. That’s really the disappointing part because I never viewed the band as separate camps and I know the audience didn’t either. When people hear songs on the radio, most of them don’t go, “Okay, who wrote that one? Who sang it? Who has the nicest pants?” They’re just listening to the songs. They like them or they don’t. What I do is try to play all the songs that I feel were so meaningful not only to the fan base, but to me as well.

MR: You wrote most everything here, right?

DD: Five of those songs were written by Tommy–“Blue Collar,” “Renegade,” “Too Much Time On My Hands,” “Fooling Yourself” and “Crystal Ball.” There are seventeen songs and twelve of them are mine. That was a really terrific band. What I liked about it was the variety, and I think the vast majority of Styx fans enjoyed the variety that we provided. I just did an interview with a Dutch guy because, obviously, this is being released worldwide, which I believe includes Rancho Cucamonga. He was talking about Styx and Queen and a million different things and the thing he said he enjoyed about Styx was the variety, and that’s the thing that I enjoyed about it. I based everything about us on the Beatles. Not that we were going to be them or be like them but the fact that they felt that they could write a great song and put it on an album and it didn’t matter what style it was. That was always my theory. To the band I always preached, “Song, song, song, it doesn’t matter, it’s the song that counts.” You come down the road forty years later, Michael, and the thing that matters, the reason guys like me and all the old farts from the sixties and seventies still can play is not because they look at us and we look the same ad we have the same-type pants. It’s because they love those songs. That’s it. They love the songs. So that’s why I love Styx and that’s why I like this DVD, because with the minor exception of “Boat On The River”–which is a big hit outside of the US–we’ve got all the big ones down there, the ones that really mattered.

MR: What do you think about your contribution to music history? As Dennis DeYoung and with Styx.

DD: I absolutely know what I contributed: After 1975, after we became a hit I was really the captain on the ship. I always tell people, “If you never liked Styx, you blame me.” If you liked them, you’ve got to give me some credit, because I was the guy who was essentially mixing the albums and I was kind of like the shadow producer. If you look at the theme albums–Grand Illusion, Pieces Of Eight, Paradise Theatre, Kilroy Was Here–those are all my concepts. If you like those records, they were because I was involved in it to that degree. I didn’t write those other songs that we played in the show that Tommy wrote. Those are great songs. I didn’t write them. He wrote them. But I was very instrumental. For instance, “Renegade” was not a rock song when Tommy brought it in. It was an acoustic song sung in three part harmony, not with one lead singer. I suggested to Tommy, “Tommy, that should be you by yourself singing that song and it should be a rock song. How would it go if it was a rock song?” and he started thinking and he just started playing that riff to “Renegade.” That’s what I meant to the band. That’s what I did. “Crystal Ball,” same thing, it was an all-acoustic song with three part harmony because Tommy’s brilliant at that and I said, “Tommy, you’ve got to sing that song.” So if you like the Styx albums, if I’m responsible for a lot of it. If you didn’t like it, blame me.

MR: People look at your albums from that era and tend to call what you did “progressive rock,” or “prog rock.” Was that the intention?

DD: I don’t think we were prog rock. I’ve seen some prog rock blogs and people who like prog rock are more happy with Gentle Giant. I mean, we’re not that. We were stealing from all sorts of genres. That’s what we did. We were an amalgam. If you looked at “Lady,” for instance, I wrote that in ’72 and people talk about the ballads, Michael. What is the first minute of “Lady?” If you just heard the first minute, Michael, it’s a ballad, isn’t it? That’s the song that made us famous. It wasn’t like we came to ballads late in life. It was the first hit we had. It was the thing that identified us, but what we did was turn it into a rock song. Some people have speculated that that was one of the first power ballads, but I don’t know. All I know is it started as a ballad and ended as a rock song.

Because that was a hit, that style that I think we happened on quite by accident became signature to what we would do throughout our career. And whether it was a straight love ballad like “Babe” or “Lady” or “Best Of Times,” or it was more progressive like “Sweet Madame Blue” or “Man In The Wilderness,” or things that start acoustically and soft and build into something, this was just signature to what we do. We were not a prog rock band. We certainly had prog overtones to a lot of things we did. We formed in 1970 and I was a keyboard player and I listened to Keith Emerson and the new Yes record and we liked them a lot so there was some of that in our music. But really, we were a song-driven band and so many prog rock bands are not song-driven. They concentrate on the complexity of their time signatures, their key changes, and what I would call their technical dexterity. We had some technical dexterity but we are not those guys. The song was the song was the song. By the way, Michael, is there a penalty for saying “song” too much in one interview? Because if there is I’ll take a few away.

MR: [laughs] I’ll count them up later. It seemed like there was a major transition for the band between Crystal Ball and The Grand Illusion. What happened?

DD: I think it started with Equinox. I’m going to tell you what it was right now. “Lady” was supposed to be on the first album. Our producer kept it off. It was on the second album and it was a total failure when it first came out. “Lady” was a hit two and a half years later after it was released. It became a hit record by accident. If in 1972 we were able to make the reocrd we wanted we would’ve had a different trajectory to our career, but it didn’t happen that way. As soon as “Lady” was a hit I knew what we should be doing. I wrote “Lady” for an album called Styx II. Of the seven songs on the record, five of them were mine and Michael, it was the biggest flop of all time. So for the next two albums, I was certain people hated what I did and I tried to be somebody else, anybody else. When “Lady” was a hit I said, “Oh, okay. They liked what I thought they would like,” because that’s what I do. And from that point forward, I knew where we should be going.

Crystal Ball brought in Tommy for the first record we ever did. We didn’t know each other. We were thrown together and we made an album and it was a pretty good album, but we toured for a year with Tommy, we got to know each other as writers and performers and Grand Illusion was the result of that year spent together with a new principal songwriter. When we did Crystal Ball Tommy and I collaborated on “Mademoiselle” and “Ballerina.” We tried to incorporate a new band member, a new songwriter, a new singer, everything was new. So obviously we didn’t have much chance. I think we started recording Crystal Ball only like two or three months after he joined the band. So by the time we got to Grand Illusion, we knew who we were. Grand Illusion is the best Styx album. All cylinders were firing and everything was going in the right direction.

MR: Do you have a favorite Styx song?

DD: I’m asked that a lot, and I don’t. It’s funny, I don’t have a favorite Styx song. I could tell you my favorite Tommy Shaw song, I could probably tell you my favorite Dennis DeYoung song of the bunch, but I don’t really have a favorite one. I guess my favorite would have to be “Come Sail Away,” by what I do. But by Tommy, I love “Fooling Yourself.” I love that song. It’s just beyond my capabilities to judge that properly. Here’s the thing about “Come Sail Away”… It is the hardest song I have to sing all night. If you go to YouTube and just put “Come Sail Away” in and see how many people have tried to sing it, you’ll understand. Nobody sings it well. It’s really a tricky song to sing. I would probably say that hands down. Night after night I say to myself, “Why did I write this melody?” “Come Sail Away” is what I think is the quintessential Styx song because if you brought a martian down and he said, “What was Styx?” and you played that, it probably cover the ballad, the prog thing and the just the pure rock ‘n’ roll with the chorus, it covers all three things.

MR: What was your favorite song to at least sing or perform from this latest live album?

DD: I think “Sweet Madame Blue,” which is a song that missed by the record company in the US at the time. “Sweet Madame Blue” is rather grandiose. They may say pompous and pretentious, but you know what I say to people who say that? “Of course! That’s what we intended. What’s wrong with you?” That was the whole point! We’re not Muddy Waters. I love Muddy, I could listen to “Mannish Boy” forever. That’s not what we’re doing! Hey Michael, this is show business over here! It was supposed to be big! That’s the whole point. I know there’s people who say, “Oh, blah blah blah,” and I say, “Okay, well like something else then! I don’t care, but this is what we’re doing.” We’re supposed to be heart on the sleeve, you know what I mean? Bigger than life. I’m Italian! What do you want from me?

MR: [laughs] Speaking of grandiose, there was this little thing called Kilroy Was Here and that whole “Mr. Roboto” thing.

DD: Yeah, and listen, I’m going to take full credit for it! You can blame me again! Here it is, are you ready? I’m going to say something to you: Domo arigato! Finish it!

MR: Mister Roboto! There, you happy?

DD: [laughs] I think the Japanese should reach out and send me some Sony products because I made “Domo arigato” popular in the United States! Is it part of our culture? I know it is. Did I know it would be? Hell no. Here’s the joke of it. It was never supposed to be a single. Never! It was just a transitional piece. I wrote it to go from the movie that started our concert to the live stage action. It was a transitional narrative piece to tie the story together. When the record company said, “That could be the single!” I said, “A single?” At the end when I’m yelling “I am Kilroy,” what the hell does that mean?” I had no idea.

So here’s what I’m going to say… People call these things guilty pleasures, don’t they, Michael? You know what that means to me? If you’ve got a guilty pleasure, that means some snooty elitist has told you what you like is not cool. That’s all it says. A guilty pleasure means you’re not allowed to like that by some group of people who have deemed that not appropriate and cool for you to like and I say that’s like an acquired taste. You know what I say about acquired tastes? They’re idiotic. Life’s too short. I either like it or I don’t. I’m not going to practice eating food. You know what I’m saying? Acquired taste. Stop me! Somebody please cut the bullshit off my shoulder blades, I can’t stand it! A guilty pleasure. Michael, if you like something, don’t apologize. You like it.

MR: Your last laugh with that recording was how many movies, how many TV shows, and just how often it comes up in entertainment-speak.

DD: Here’s the deal: If you go to YouTube and type in “Mr. Roboto,” no Styx songs comes close to the number of hits that “Mr. Roboto” has generated in every imaginable country. Every kid who had tinfoil and a wand will do “Mr. Roboto.” I don’t know how that happened. Honest to God. I know it has something to do with me allowing Volkswagen to put it into a commercial about ten years ago. You know who Tony Hale is? He’s from Arrested Development and now he’s on Veep. He’s the guy in the Volkswagen commercial who’s doing the robot.

MR: [laughs] I forgot that, that’s right!

DD: Back in 1983, it sold a million singles. We were not a band who sold singles, we sold albums. But we sold a million singles on that because eleven year-old boys loved that song. You want to know what’s happening right now in 2014? Eleven year-old boys love that song. Honest to God, I’ll look out at the audience and you’ll see eleven or twelve year old girls and boys with their parents and the minute that we play that song, their eyes light up. I don’t know what that is, but I wish I’d have done it about five more times.

MR: I think maybe Daft Punk beat you to the punch with Random Access Memories.

DD: I know. I looked at the helmet and I said, “Put that on Roboto!” I should’ve thought of that. Then when I perform, I wouldn’t ever have to comb my hair.

MR: Well, what about Dennis DeYoung meets Daft Punk?

DD: Yeah! We’ll meet them over at a pizza parlor. I’m buying.

MR: I have a question I ask everyone. Dennis, what is your advice for new artists?

DD: Stay out of the business for Christ’s sake. Who needs the competition?

MR: [laughs] Any other advice?

DD: Obviously, I’m kidding and here’s what I’m going to tell you. Kids, the dream I had, that dream is over. I was lucky by birth, I lived at the greatest time in the history of mankind to be a musician. Never before and never after I believe will so many musicians have the opportunities and the fruitful careers that I have had. I was lucky by birth. You young guys and gals have got a much tougher road to haul than we did. Music is seen as disposable. The audience I had didn’t view music that way. It was vital to their lives. I would say you’ve still got the dream but please keep your eyes wide open because it’s going to be a tougher world for you to exist in.

MR: Do you feel like you would’ve done anything differently than what you did?

DD: Anybody who gets to my age and says they never would have done anything differently is either on drugs or is a liar. I think even Mother Teresa would’ve corrected a few things herself. Maybe Jesus really said, “Maybe I should’ve destroyed the temple.” People should have regrets. If you don’t have regrets, you’re implying you’re perfect.

MR: Dennis, what do you want to do in the future?

DD: I’d like to see the Bears win the Super Bowl and White Socks win another World Series. Beyond that, Frontiers has been kind enough to offer me the opportunity to make another studio album, so there you go.

MR: And you’re continuing to tour?

DD: I am. I don’t have a tour, so to speak. I play about fifty shows every year all over the place, so it’s kind of continual. It’s not like we go out for three months and then go home for three. We play weekends and that kind of thing.

MR: I have to ask you, how do you keep your voice in shape?

DD: Thong underwear three sizes too small. And wet them some time. It really makes a difference. I don’t know, I respected it. I respected the nature of singing, I didn’t do drugs, I didn’t drink, I didn’t smoke, that helps. And I hired somebody to yell at my kids. It was a very large Ukranian man. Scared the hell out of them.

MR: On to your solo album, Desert Moon. When you started your solo career, were you coming at music the same way you were with Styx?

DD: Absolutely not. Tommy quit the band unexpectedly in ’83 to pursue a solo career. It shocked me. I never wanted to have a solo career, I loved being in a band, but when he left J.Y. John and Chuck wanted me to replace Tommy and go on and I didn’t want to do it because I thought he and I were vital to what we were as Styx. I only recorded Desert Moon and the other solo albums because I was waiting for Tommy to come back to the band. But when I did Desert Moon, I did not want to do a Styx record because I thought that was sacred and that was really reserved for the guys in the band, so I made more of a pop-sounding AC record and that’s what I did for the first three albums in my solo career. Every night I play the song “Desert Moon,” I say, “This should’ve been a Styx song. If we’d have stayed together and Tommy hadn’t left, it would’ve been a Styx song.” Then I would just say, ultimately, you tell the fans, “Forget about all the nonsense that you’ve heard, enjoy the music.”

I loved being in that band. Don’t believe all the negativity because nobody stays in a band together for ten years like that the way it’s been portrayed. There’s a video, go to YouTube, it’s Styx and we’re lip-synching to “Rockin’ The Paradise” at a photo session. If you watch that video, you’ll know who Styx was–a bunch of clowny goofballs. You know, I have a sense of humor, Michael, and John Panozzo was the funniest guy I ever knew in my life. We were funny guys, but everybody always viewed us as serious. We really were not serious people at all. Serious about our music but not serious about ourselves. I would say go to dennisdeyoung.com or go to my Facebook page if you want to learn more about me. You can buy this record, you can preorder it on Amazon.com or just wait until it comes out and steal it…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rl1ONe-PKUE&feature=youtu.be

Transcribed by Galen Hawthorne

*************************

TIM FITE’S Big MAC

2014-09-29-TimFite_BigMAC.jpg
photo courtesy Tim Fite

According to Tim Fite…

“When it comes to the latest developments in personal computing technology, SIZE MATTERS! And, nobody is bigger than APPLE, a company that has become known for BIG ideas, BIG release events, BIG prices, and most recently their BIG iPhone 6. The song ‘Big MAC’ satirizes the gotta-have-it-now lifestyle marketing that has made Apple products the BIGGEST status symbol of our time: ‘iPhone 8, I can’t wait for Siri to sit on my face.'”

*************************

2014-09-28-RJGibbSeptember30.jpg

A Conversation with RJ Gibb

Mike Ragogna: RJ, 50 St. Catherine’s Drive is the last project your dad was working on before he passed away, so that must have been an incredibly challenging task for you to complete because of the emotional bond you had as father and son.

RJ Gibb: Yeah. He had started work on this project in 2006 to 2008, that’s when the recordings had taken place. I had at that time also composed a couple of popular songs with him. We composed the Titanic requiem together with the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra. That was later, we started that in 2010 and finished it in 2012 with the debut at Westminster Hall. But we had actually been working on some popular songs before that and we had planned to after the requieum as well. We had songs like “Instant Love,” “One-Way Love,” “Syndey,” about his brothers, which I actually did the production on after he wrote it himself. There’s another one that we had actually written for the Titanic requiem that was added later, “Don’t Cry Alone.” So there are four songs that we wrote together that will be on the album, but apart from that I did the final production. Pete Vettese and him started the production back in 2008 and then I started a couple of years ago and we just finished last year. Number 50, Saint Catherine’s Drive in the Isle of Mann was the first house my father lived in. It was actually the house he was brought back to from the hospital immediately following his birth. This was a project he wanted to do because he wanted to team back up with Barry. Barry wasn’t feeling well at the time but when he was feeling a bit better, they were going to get back together, so he shelved the album. So for about four years, it just lay dormant and then when it came back up that Warner wanted to put it out, we went into the studio and finished the production.

MR: Can you tell us more about that Titanic requiem, like how that came together and what everybody’s part was?

RG: Sure. My father and I had alwasy wanted to come out with an album together, we were working on popular stuff as I said but the thing is I was classically trained. When I started I was playing violin, trumpet, I then went on to play guitar and keyboards and that’s what I use to compose now, but my father had always adored classical music, we both loved Mozart and Schubert, so we teamed up with the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra. We decided to do a requiem because it was the hundredth anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic and we decided to do it as a tribute to the fallen of the Titanic. It debuted at Westminster Hall, sadly he never made the opening as he’d fallen into a coma and this was after going into remission about four times, so this was after a long, hard battle. I think the requiem kept him going for a long time as well because he had something to strive for. Although he did come out of the coma after the debut…we played the confutatis from the Titanic requiem and he woke up. He actually said to me he could hear the song playing, it was actually incredible. We thought we weren’t going to see him again, they’d pretty much written him off. He had been expected to sing that night at the debut, he was going to sing “Don’t Cry Alone,” but as he sadly couldn’t attend, they played a recording of the vocals and the Royal Philharmonic played along. It was the first time I’d ever seen at a purely classical concert people giving a standing ovation for a recorded vocal. But, of course, I think that’s the last time they thought they were going to hear him.

MR: How did that experience leave you? You must have been riding high.

RG: Yeah, of course. I didn’t know if that was the last time I would hear his voice played in a musical hall or at a venue. We always had hope for him, as I said he had gone through four remissions already, it was a hard battle and he was a hard fighter. As a realist, I knew what could happen and of course I think he also knew as well–he didn’t write himself off but he knew what could happen and I think that’s what made him strive to do so many things in the last few years. He knew he had cancer for about two and a half years. We accomplished a lot, after the requiem we wrote a lot of popular music together as well, those will be coming out at some point as well, he was making films as well in the garden, it was unbelievable. He’s made a few comedy sketches, he was always into the Goons–Peter Sellers and Spike Milligan. He had a sharp wit, a very dry sense of humor, a very admirable sense of humor. I don’t think I’ll ever meet anyone like that again.

MR: To me, The Bee Gees seemed like they were Australia’s most popular export. Is that how Australia saw them?

RG: Well, yeah. He was born on the Isle of Mann and his parents were from Manchester. He went back to Manchester and they grew up the first part of their childhood there, but then they moved to Australia when they were about nine or ten. That’s when they started–my father said, “We’ve sung in some of the best toilets in Australia,”–because they used to go to the toilets to hear the echo for harmonies. Then they started playing for pennies at the race track and they were picked up by a DJ over there who backed them up. That’s when they had their first number one, “Spicks & Specks.” When they came back to England their father had gotten in touch with Robert Stigwood and the rest is history, really. They’ve always had a strong connection with Australia, even now. Their sister stayed in Australia and she very much considers herself Australian. A part of them always, I guess, considered themselves British but another part considered themselves Australian.

MR: Ambassadors, maybe.

RG: Definitely.

MR: I think when you looked at the three of them I think even if Barry was the overt ladies man, Robin seemed to really pop out as the backbone of the band. How did the brothers function together as far as laying out responsibilities?

RG: I think Barry had the image as the ladies’ man and I think my father had the boyish, angelic vocals and Maurice was the tech man, very good with music. When my father even did a solo album it was Maurice who helped with the music as well. You know, “Juliet.” I just think Maurice was the music mastermind, my father was the vocalist and Barry could work the crowds and had a great voice when it came to some of the more modern stuff they got into at that time, which was sort of the start of modern house music, the disco era.

MR: Yes, a lot of people forget that. Were they as surprised as everyone else that they conquered the world in that format?

RG: It started in France, really. They had written these blue-eyed soul tracks, which is what they were calling it at the time. They had delved into the new dance music and they tried their hand at it and just came up with these tracks. Basically, they had taken one of their engineers at the time, Blue Weaver, put a heartbeat monitor on him and were listening to the beat and then they made one of the first drumloops by splicing together the tapes around the room. This was the way they created these dance tracks with the “thump thump thump,” the four beat that you hear in a lot of modern house. They didn’t know what to do with it really, they were just experimenting. Then Robert Stigwood said, “Look, I’ve got this new film coming out, it’s got no backing, no advertisement, do you guys have anything to put on it?” They said, “Well funny enough we’ve just been playing around with dance music if you want to hear what we’ve done in France.” I think the cows outside this small chalet were the first ones to hear “Stayin’ Alive.”

MR: [laughs]

RG: They sent it over to him and he said, “Wow, this is great.” They took about nine of the tracks and put them on and without any advertising, just word of mouth, it got around. Disco was already around but I think this completely revolutionized the way it was done.

MR: Yeah. A lot of the older disco records had the emphasis on repetetive parts, extended dance mixes and all that, whereas The Bee Gees had a more lyrical, traditional song-like structure that they really deeply understood.

RG: Yes, and they applied that to the four beat dance feel. I agree. We were talking about some of the older tracks and coming out of Australia and “Spicks & Specks.” On 50 St. Catherine’s Drive there are three potential singles and one of them is actually, “I Am The World,” which was the B-side of “Spicks & Specks.” The original version of the song was released in 1966 as the B-side of the hit. My dad decided to record a new version for the new album, he wrote a new middle eight for it. He loved the song because it was one of the first songs he actually wrote. There’s another one, “Days Of Wine & Roses,” where the song itself is actually a reverse. He played it backwards from a song, “Broken Wings.” He played that song backwards and he came up with “Days Of Wine & Roses,” which is another potential single for this album. But the third potential single is the song we wrote together, “Instant Love,” which is quite poignant because it’s the last time we actually sang together. It’s father and son together, sing a verse each and then duetting on the chorus. “I Am The World” is definitely coming out as a single but the other two are the ones people should look for as singles promoting the album.

MR: “Days Of Wine & Roses” is an Oscar Wilde reference. How did that particular inspiration come about?

RG: My father and I both had a lot of respect for Oscar Wilde because he’s one of the best wits of the nineteenth century. He didn’t have many plays, but I think what he was actually remembered for in society and what people wrote about him was what he would actually say to people. My father always respected great witty comedy and I think that’s probably what drew him to Oscar. A lot of his plays are not as witty as I would say he was in his private life and what people have written about him and their experiences with him as a person. I love his plays though, I love him as a literary giant definitely. It was Ernest Dowson, the poet who had originally penned the phrase, “They are not long, the days of wine of wine and roses.” Oscar Wilde used the quote when his literary peer Ernest Dowson died. My dad did admire him for his wit as we were just saying, but I think when he found the phrase as an ode to his friend it kind of reminded him of Maurice and of others he’d lost. I think it was kind of poignant thing because it also talks about the days when they were young and coming up in the world and remembering all the beautiful things in the past. I think it struck a note with him.

MR: “Wherever You Go” was originally called “Wing & A Prayer” and there’s a story behind that. The title originally came from the World War II patriotic song?

RG: Yes. “Wing & A Prayer” was actually a song that The Bee Gees wrote together. My father realized that people would remember it a lot easier if it had an original title, so “Wherever You Go” was the new title. It was changed to avoid confusion, basically. The original title came from the famous American second world war patriotic song by Harold Adamson and Jim McHugh. They wrote a song about a plane struggling home from combat, “Comin’ In On A Wing And A Prayer.” My father and myself have always loved military history, my father started helping the Bomber Command Memorial Fund which I still support now as well because Bomber Command here was the outfit that lost more troops than any other outfit. God, there were over fifty five thousand killed and they never put a monument up for them, they tried to distance themselves from them. They didn’t realize the strategic importance. It wasn’t just retaliation bombing that they were doing. Even Churchill, before he distanced himself, said, “It’s the bombers that will win the war,” because they brought one million Wehrmacht off the frontlines, brought them into the cities, and also brought all of the 88-millimeter flak guns into the cities to protect them. It took them off the frontlines and allowed the allies to advance. They also took out the entire Wolfpack in dock–the U-boats. But they were never recognized. He campaigned, it was one of the last things he did–and we did it as a family, really, as well. We campaigned to get the monument put up in Green Park, it’s now one of the most visited monuments in London.

MR: What’s the backstory on “Alan Freeman Days”?

RG: Well he was an Australian, he was a celebrated radio disc jockey in the United Kingdom in the sixties, seventies, and eighties. He’s someone that my father truly kept in his heart and admired and he loved the man over a long period of time because he had a special memory of Alan dating back to the late 1960s when The Bee Gees had temporarily split up. Soon after the split my dad released his first solo album called Robin’s Reign. Probably, the most famous solo song that my father wrote was “Saved By The Bell.” Alan Freeman, who was known as Fluff, told my father that there were certain entities who wanted the Bee Gees to get back together. My father did want to get back together as well with The Bee Gees but a lot of people didn’t realize this was the case.

When my father came out with a solo album because he wanted to keep working they thought it was going to stop The Bee Gees from getting back together. My dad just wanted to work in the mean time until The Bee Gees got back together. What they did was they tried to put spanners in the works and they asked the DJs–or tried to backhand the DJs not to play my dad’s song thereby reducing the chances of it becoming successful. But Alan Freeman was the only DJ who said no. He wouldn’t take any backhands and he stood up against these entitites and decided that “Saved By The Bell” was a number one hit, it should be out and it should be heard and he was going to play it regardless of the pressure. It went on to become a hit. It didn’t become a number one hit in England, it reached number two, but it’s still remembered as a classic.

My father never forgot what Alan did for him and he frequently communicated with Alan and visited him when he was sick and being cared for him at Brinsworth House which was a home for retired actors and others in the entertainment industry. So as president of the Heritage Foundation, which was where support of the whole Bomber Command Memorial came about he decided that Alan should have a blue plaque. Anyone who’s alive gets a green plaque if they’re being honored, say outside the building where they used to work, but they get a blue plaque if they’ve passed away. After Alan passed away he pushed and insured for Alan to have his blue plaque at Brinsworth house acknowledging Alan’s contributions, not just to him but to music in general. He was one of the great DJs of the sixties to the eighties. My dad wrote the song in honor of Mister Alan Freeman.

MR: What do you think your dad’s legacy is going to be? And what do you think the legacy of The Bee Gees is going to be?

RG: Well I think they’ve already proved themselves as one of the greatest acts of the twentieth century, they have one of the most extensive and most successful catalogs out there. There are people like Mozart who was basically honored for his accomplishments long after his death and there are people like my father who were honored during their lifetime. I think their legacy doesn’t matter either way. If you write amazing music, whether you’re honored during your lifetime or not these contributions to music will stick and people will try to emulate them and people will always be compared to people like The Bee Gees or to entities like them. They set the standard, really.

MR: Well, during the lifespan of the group, they contributed so much that it already mattered a lot.

RG: That’s right. I also think that what we all do is make something eternal, something that lasts long beyond our deaths. That’s why I said it didn’t matter if they were recognized after or during because that’s what we all strive to do is make our stamp on the world and to make something that people will love and cherish and to make people feel happier about themselves through music and just to make something eternal. That’s the only way we live forever is through our work and what we leave behind.

MR: That’s so true. What are you personally working as an artist now?

RG: Myself? I will continue to make classical works but at the same time I’m producing my own album at the moment which is a popular music album. I’m also working on house music and trance music for Ibiza. You’ll see not only this dance music that’s going to Ibiza but I’ll also be coming out with an actual popular album that I’ve been working on for the last year and a half. Apart from that I’m also a mentalist, a psychological magician really. I’ve been doing this kind of work since I was fifteen but I’ve really just decided to push it forward into the professional scene in the last two years. I’ve known quite a few mentalists during my lifetime including Uri Geller, he’s a close friend of the family. I’ve always been interested in this type of magic, psychological ideomotor response using hypnotics and neurolinguistic programming. It’s used to bring about effects that either make peope do what you want to do or make it seem like they’re happening. Basically, you could call it a type of magician or illusionist. But I’m doing Children In Need at The Savoy Hotel this October, which is being hosted by Terry Wogan. That’s the first big gig I’m doing as a mentalist. But apart from that I’m coming out with my popular music album and I’m doing another project in Ibiza as I said with dance music. And I studied for seven years under Andy Hinds at Classic Stage Ireland, so I’m also an actor. I’m currently in that sphere, I have an agent for acting. I’ve always been interested in the performing arts, which is where mentalism comes into it as well, because it is a performance art. That’s really where I am right now.

MR: RJ, what advice do you have for new artists?

RG: I would say never let anyone bring you down or tell you that what you’re doing isn’t good enough, believe in yourself, learn from your mistakes and always make music that you would buy. Don’t try and emulate everyone, don’t try and be another clone, there’s so many of the same out there but there’s only one you. The world hasn’t seen you yet, so who knows if you could be accepted or not as another entity in that field. Also, a lot of people have a lot of material hanging around for a while and to them it gets old, but no one’s heard it before. To everyone else, it’s new material.

Transcribed by Galen Hawthorne

AkihabaraNews on The Kong Show: Top 10 J-Tech & Culture, and the Dude from Boston!

AkihabaraNews on The Kong Show: Top 10 J-Tech & Culture, and the Dude from Boston!

Google Turns Sweet Sixteen With Possible Android L Nickname Hint

google lollipopHow times has flies – the Internet search giant that is known as Google has just turned 16 years old earlier this month, and the company traditionally celebrates its birthday on September 27th despite that not being the actual date. After all, until the year 2005, Google had always noted its birthday to fall on September 7th, which is the right deal anyways as that happens to be the day in which it was incorporated. This particular switch in dates that allowed the celebration of its birthday a few weeks later in September happened to coincide with when Google announced the number of web pages were indexed.

That particular figure happened to be somewhere on top of 30 trillion, and as most of us know, Google is capable of handling up to millions of searches every single minute. Regardless, September is the actual “birth month” of Google, so to speak, and it has been a zany past 16 years.

Needless to say, all birthday celebrations deserve to have a cake served up, and Google decided to share what their 16th birthday cake looked like – and instead of 16 candles being placed there (or one large and half a dozen smaller candles), the top of the cake happened to be full of lollipops. Android L – for Lollipop, perhaps? Only time will tell.

Google Turns Sweet Sixteen With Possible Android L Nickname Hint

, original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Underwater Robot Created For Port Security

underwater robotWhere there is a will, there is a way. Since time immemorial, there has always been pirates as humans traversed the seven seas, not to mention smugglers who try to bring contraband material from one part of the world to another, and this game of cat and mouse continues to be played out until today. Well, there has been technology developed for the authorities to be able to detect smuggled goods in ships, and one of the most recent advances would include this particular robot that is the size of a football which will skim discreetly along a ship’s hull, as it looks out for hollow compartments that could be used as a place to hide contraband.

MIT researchers revealed this oval-shaped submersible robot just last week, where it sports a flattened panel on one side and yet it is capable of sliding alongside an underwater surface so that it will be able to perform ultrasound scans.

That was not the original intention or purpose of its design though, as it is meant to check out the presence of cracks in nuclear reactors’ water tanks, allowing it to subsequently inspect ships when it comes to having false hulls, as well as checking out propeller shafts which smugglers tend to use to hide contraband. Imagine these tiny robots doing all the inspection work – and if one of them cost less than a $1,000, it would be far more cost effective in the long run – and smugglers would have to figure out of other creative access methods in their line of work.

Underwater Robot Created For Port Security

, original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Ford Admits To Sending False Engine Noise Via Car’s Speakers

mustang noiseAh, the Ford Mustang, deemed by fans to be one of the quintessential muscle cars from the U.S., might have run into a spot of trouble. Apparently, Ford has stepped forward to admit that they have pumped false engine noise into the cab via the vehicle’s speakers, now how about that for deception?

After all, owners of muscle cars love to hear the sounds of a powerful engine, but if your ears were actually conned into listening to something that isn’t really there, then Houston, we have a problem. Apparently, Ford intends to have drivers enjoy the best of both worlds – feel the muscle and hear it from underneath the hood, but the artificial method in which they went about doing it does not leave too much of a good impression.

Ford claims that this is what they have dubbed the “Active Noise Control”, where the system was specially designed to do away with background noise which the driver would not find desirable, but also offers what has been called by Ford to be an “authentic” driving experience. Apparently, reproducing amplified engine noise via the speakers in the vehicle after putting it through a refinement process in order to deliver a more ideal listening experience is not deemed to be “fake noise” by Ford. You be the judge.

Ford Admits To Sending False Engine Noise Via Car’s Speakers

, original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Cloaking Device Developed By University Of Rochester Researchers

cloaking device harry potter rochesterWhile there are no more immediate Harry Potter movies to look forward to at the moment, this does not mean the world of Harry Potter has come to a grinding halt – there are segments of a theme park dedicated to it, not to mention having the presence of an entire museum, as the wonders of the world of magic is being brought alive by science. Take this cloaking device developed by researchers over at the University of Rochester for instance – while it is not an actual invisibility cloak per se, it is a handheld device that could see action across a range of situations.

Graduate student and researcher Joseph Choi, shared, “From what we know this is the first cloaking device that provides three-dimensional, continuously multidirectional cloaking. I imagine this could be used to cloak a trailer on the back of a semi-truck so the driver can see directly behind him. It can be used for surgery, in the military, in interior design, art.”

Do bear in mind that this is definitely not the first cloaking device project ever, and neither does it look set to be the last. However, this particular cloaking device effort will not distort the background, but rather, it will do so to the subject itself, and the entire shebang would not cost more than a Benjamin, which you are able to comfortably bring together in your own home, now how about that?

Cloaking Device Developed By University Of Rochester Researchers

, original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Drop in Support for Gay Marriage is no Cause for Alarm

A new survey from Pew shows that support for marriage equality has dropped five percentage points since the start of the year, but there’s no need for gay and lesbian couples to panic — at least not yet.

The poll is just one of eight conducted this year, and shows support at 49% to 41% opposed. But all seven other surveys in 2014 show support at over 50%. That includes a Gallup survey from May of 2014 that shows support steady at 55% since last year, and climbing steadily up from 50% in 2010.

What’s more, a second survey released last week shows support climbing to 56%. That survey is from CBS and The New York Times, and the same poll showed support at 51% in 2012.

In addition, a March survey from the Washington Post and ABC put support at 59%. The year prior, it was 57%, and in 2012 it was 51%.

In other words, though the Pew findings may seem disheartening, they are way out of line with every other major national survey conducted recently.

Taken as a general trend among all surveys, public support for marriage is currently hovering around 56%. Opposition is dropping past 38%.

Of course, it’s possible that the Pew survey represents an extremely sudden and dramatic shift in public opinion. But they likelihood of that is slim, since another survey conducted at the same time showed support far higher.

And over the last two decades, there have been at least 130 reputable national surveys on public support for marriage. (Plus far more at the state level.) During that time, there has never been a time when numbers have not fluctuated somewhat from one survey to the next. But there has also never been a time when the general trend of support for equality has declined.

Senate Forecast 2014 | The Huffington Post

Senate Forecast 2014 | The Huffington Post