Mexico Supreme Court Rejects Energy Referendum

MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexico’s Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a bid to hold a national referendum on a major energy overhaul that opened the sector to widespread private investment for the first time in 76 years.

In identical 9-1 rulings, the court found that referendum petitions filed by two leftist parties were unconstitutional because matters involving state revenue cannot be subjected to popular vote. Energy reform’s passage in August has been President Enrique Pena Nieto’s biggest political victory since taking office in 2012.

It allows national and foreign private companies to invest in petroleum and electricity projects, something that was long considered taboo after oil was nationalized in 1938 by then-President Lazaro Cardenas.

Mexico’s political left strenuously opposed the overhaul and had sought a referendum asking citizens if they approve of the constitutional changes it entailed. By law, the Supreme Court must determine whether such a vote would be constitutional.

Sen. Dolores Padierna of the opposition Democratic Revolution Party criticized the ruling, saying the issue at stake is not government income but rather “our natural resources … (and) their use for the nation’s benefit.”

Proponents of the changes say private investment and expertise is needed to reverse a steady decline in oil and gas production by state petroleum monopoly Pemex in recent years.

Analysts say energy investment has the potential to reach $15 billion a year under the new rules.

Android 5.0 Lollipop On The Galaxy S5


I am quite sure that many people are looking forward with anticipation to the release of Android 5.0 Lollipop to the masses. In fact, one can more or less say that this happens to be close to, or on par with, Jelly Bean’s release that happened a couple of years ago. Just how will Android 5.0 Lollipop look like on the Samsung Galaxy S5? The folks over at SamMobile managed to obtain and install the latest Samsung build for Android 5.0 Lollipop, piecing together a video that you can view above at your own pleasure.

Apparently, the folks over at Samsung have thrown into the mix a slew of user interface changes since the early bild was released. In fact, Samsung has included a Galaxy Note 4-style fingerprint lock screen, not to mentin animations which are a whole lot smoother compared to the first build, the inclusion of additional stock applications that have been on the receiving end of the Material Design treatment, an improved user interface and icons on the Settings screen, and a systemwide font that looks a wee bit thinner.

It remains to be seen as to when Samsung will roll out its Android 5.0 Lollipop update for its flagship devices, but since this second build is shaping up really nicely, we do hope that users need not wait for long.

Android 5.0 Lollipop On The Galaxy S5

, original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Silver Headset Hits Retailers Now

silver wired headsetIt is one thing to hear about the impending release of a particular device or accessory, and another altogether to see it finally hit the market. It was just in September when the Silver Wired Stereo Headset that features 7.1 virtual surround sound, custom audio modes and a retractable boom mic all was announced, carrying with it a $69.99 price tag, but today, those who have been interested in picking one up will be able to do so from retailers.

Here is a quick refresher on what the Silver headset is all about – this is a lightweight headset that boasts of breathable ear cushions so that the wearer can enjoy up to hours of gameplay. In addition, the inclusion of a retractable boom mic for voice chat works great for those who indulge in online games, while a remote control USB connector would then enable one to hook up directly to a PS4, allowing one to take advantage of the headset’s built-in features.

Offering immersive 7.1 virtual surround sound, in-line volume and mic controls, a range of custom audio modes that were created by developers specifically for PlayStation games, the Silver headset will also play nice with PlayStation Vita and other mobile devices which carry a 3.5mm jack. [Press Release]

Silver Headset Hits Retailers Now

, original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Reaction to the Expecting Quadruplets Pics

Recent pictures of mom-to-be Ashley Gardner’s reaction to the news that she is expecting quadruplets has quickly spread in social media circles, and it had particular traction among members of the preemie community, for good reason.

I certainly wish a healthy and long pregnancy for Ashley. However, according to statistics, triplets have a 91% chance of being born preterm and a 41% chance of being born extremely preterm. One can safely assume the risks are even greater with quadruplets.

The side-effects of being born extremely preterm are too numerous to list, but you can get an idea of the potential future for quadruplets by reading Timothy Spillane’s recently released memoir, Four Before Their Time. Mr. Spillane chronicles his daughter’s journey carrying quads, the babies’ extremely preterm birth and the roller coaster ride the family endured. Miraculously, all four babies came home, but not without complications, and while the Spillane family is grateful for the support they have received along the way, it’s a gross understatement to say that it has not been easy.

In fact, a recent study conducted by Bliss, a UK organization focused on premature birth, helped uncover the impact on parents of premature babies. The study surveyed 1,300 parents in 178 hospitals.

Among the findings:

  • The average additional costs incurred while the baby was in the NICU was454 per week.
  • Three-quarters of parents reported their household finances worsened, while one in five couldn’t afford to pay bills such as rent or mortgage.
  • Alongside the financial burden is the cost to parents’ health, with almost two-thirds of parents reporting that their mental health had worsened as a result of the extra pressure.

Despite the greater risk of a preterm birth, the percentage of multiple births has continued to climb as a result of assisted reproductive technologies. There are several technologies that can increase the percentage, but the greatest is when multiple embryos are transferred as a result of IVF (invitro-fertilization).

The reason for transferring multiple embryos often comes down to dollars and cents for the hopeful parents-to-be. The American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) lists the average price of an in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle in the U.S. to be $12,400. This cost is often paid for out-of-pocket and the charge is for each cycle, no matter how many embryos are transferred. Hopeful couples are desperately focused on the goal of becoming parents, and the risk of a preterm birth, if it is even fully explained, is rarely fully comprehended, and seems insignificant to many compared to their desire to become parents.

We need doctors to make the best decision for the long-term health of the mom and the babies. If you take dollars and cents out of the equation, why would a fertility doctor ever transfer more than one embryo?

I can speak from personal experience. My wife became pregnant with twins as a result of IVF in 2006. Based on today’s guidelines and my wife’s age at that time (33), the doctor should have transferred only one embryo. In addition, our private insurance covered our IVF treatments, so we were not worried about the out-of-pocket expenses. Neither of us can recall being warned about the risk of transferring more than one embryo. Understandably, we were focused on the chance of finally becoming parents.

Would my wife still have developed pre-eclampsia had she been pregnant with one embryo? We will never know, but the odds for a healthy pregnancy would have been far better. Instead, our babies became the 14% of twins born extremely prematurely, resulting in the loss of our son, Graham, and a four-month neo-natal intensive care unit stay for our daughter, Reece. Reece has also endured years of surgeries, ER visits, specialists and more. My wife Jenn and I have gone on in memory of our son and created a foundation that supports parents going through the journey of prematurity.

2014-10-21-NickholdingReece.jpg

The causes for the vast majority of premature births are still unknown. When it comes to assisted reproductive technologies, more needs to be done to understand the risks involved. More importantly, the risks need to be mitigated by medical professionals and effectively communicated to those of us who would are desperate to become parents, not patients.

Is It Time to Forgive Eli Manning?

Passionate NFL fans aren’t exactly patient or forgiving if things go wrong with their beloved teams. Eli Manning was a victim of the overreaction by Giants fans last season, after he had the worst full year of his career, throwing just 18 touchdowns to 27 interceptions, resulting in a quarterback rating of just 69.4. Maybe the disappointment was warranted for those numbers and a 7-9 season, but wanting the quarterback out of a job was ludicrous.

The Giants have made the playoffs in five of Manning’s nine full seasons as the starting quarterback, including eight playoff wins and two Super Bowl wins in that span. In comparison, his older brother Peyton has won 11 playoff games and just one Super Bowl in his entire career. Eli also won both Super Bowl Most Valuable Player awards.

As their stadium-sharers (the Jets… I won’t call them a “team”) have found out, starting quarterbacks often can determine the outcome of an entire season. Eli Manning has been a symbol of stability as a member of the Giants, and has not missed a single game since taking over halfway through the 2004 season after being famously selected No. 1 overall by the Chargers and then traded to the Giants. Along the way, his numbers don’t compare to Peyton’s, but they’re above-average and consistent.

This season, through seven games, Manning looks like he’s back on track, rebounding from last year’s dismal campaign. He has completed 64.9 percent of his passes (a career-high and up from 57.5 last season), has thrown for 1,573 yards, 14 touchdowns, and has limited himself to five interceptions. This has resulted in a 96.8 quarterback rating (also a career-high).

The Giants hold a 3-4 record, and losing Rashad Jennings and Victor Cruz, the first-string running back and wide receiver, have proven to be largely detrimental, as expected. However, Manning has performed well and has done his best to keep the team in games, even with a very select group of weapons on his side of the ball.

In fact, over his last five games, he has been one of the most effective quarterbacks in the entire NFL, throwing 11 touchdowns to just one interception over those games with quarterback ratings of 123.2, 117.5, 104.9, 76.5, and 116.7 respectively. It seems as though Peyton’s little brother, though overshadowed by his big bro, is having a solid under-the-radar season and is getting adjusted to the Giants’ new west coast offensive scheme.

All New York needs is a consistent defense and a few offensive weapons, and in my opinion, they will be contenders once again. Losing Jennings and Cruz would be huge losses to any other team in the NFL… it’s just a part of the game.

Giants fans, is it time to forgive the quarterback that gave you two Super Bowl rings since 2007, or is he still the garbage that you treated him like last season?

Check out Tradesports.com, a daily fantasy sports site that offers contests for each and every NFL game this season. Find out how you can play daily fantasy sports while still being a fan of your favorite teams!

AMD Could Develop New Chip For Xbox One Slim

xbox one hands on review 02 640x406In the past, the very idea of a new design when it comes to consoles more often than not involved the release of a spanking new console generation. However, over the years we have seen revisions made to current console versions, where a “slim” version would be introduced halfway through the console’s life cycle, and at times, these redesigned hardware do not only look slimmer, but sport more power efficient innards without compromising on performance. AMD might be in such a situation now, as it is suspected that they are working on a next generation chip for an upcoming “Xbox One Slim” console redesign.

Apparently, one of AMD’s senior managers did make mention that he “successfully planned and executed the first APU for Microsoft’s Xbox One Game Console in 28nm technology and a cost-reduced derivative in 20nm technology.” In other words, that translates to a new chip version that will be based on 20nm technology – and in stark contrast, the Xbox One and PS4 at the moment makes use of a 28nm processor.

What do you think the new Xbox One Slim will look like when it is finally unveiled? I am quite sure that it will retain a certain charm about it, and hopefully we will also see it accompanied by price cuts.

AMD Could Develop New Chip For Xbox One Slim

, original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Percy Harvin and the Three Questions Every Business Leader Must Ask

As football fans know, Percy Harvin is a player with tremendous talent for whom the Seattle Seahawks traded multiple high-level draft picks. On a pure talent level, he is a game-changer. But on October 17, less than halfway into his second full season with the ‘Hawks, he was traded to the lowly Jets for a conditional mid-level draft pick.

His sudden exit raises three key leadership questions for executives of all stripes.

What Game Are You Playing?

Great coaches do more than make locker room speeches. Masters of their game – men and women like Tony Dungy, Pat Summitt and Phil Jackson – have built their legacies by articulating a winning system. More than just fielding a football or basketball team, they defined what kind of game they were going to take to their opponents.

CEOs face this same challenge on a regular basis. As the CEO of a global chemicals business told us as he and his board were wrestling with two very different strategic options, “It’s not just about playing offense or defense, it’s deciding if we’re playing American or Australian-rules football. Our future depends on being clear about that.”

Every organization, whether athletic or a public company, will be filled with opinions and second guessing on what game the organization should play. But the role of the leader is to articulate a clear choice (starting in the board room), force a decision for the sake of clarity and then hold the organization accountable to executing upon that decision.

Do You Have a System to Win?

Great leaders – whether in team sports or in business – take the complex and make it simple. Over his career, in addition to successes, Seahawks Head Coach Pete Carroll has endured failures in the NFL and an embarrassing college scandal. But he took those experiences, drew his own lessons from them, and created a blueprint for winning that was simple, positive and fun – and that requires player buy-in. Under Carroll, the Seahawks’ winning system emphasizes the whole team, finding the right role for each individual and driving a positive attitude about relentless performance.

Effective leaders are consistently clear with their teams about the program they are building. Two completely different coaches from college sports today offer stand-out examples. John Calipari recruits some of the best high school basketball players into his program. A-list talent, these stars will only stay a year or two before jumping to the NBA. Yet, Calipari is able to blend that mix of egos, skills and youth into a serious contender year after year.

Coach Shaka Smart at Virginia Commonwealth University doesn’t have access to the same level of talent that Calipari does, yet his system utilizes constant defensive pressure, maximizing each player’s role in creating havoc for opponents. Smart creates – and demands – a level of buy-in that has turned VCU from “VC who?” to a nationally relevant program. Both coaches, with very different sets of players, have been clear and consistent in communicating their system.

But for leaders, a “system to win”, while necessary, is not solely sufficient. Calipari and Smart, Carroll or Jackson: these leaders devote equal thought and weight to the behaviors required to be successful within their specific system.

What Holds You Back?

Within organizations that are clear about the game they are playing and their unique system to win, good leaders clarify which behaviors will drive success. Ebay, for example, is explicit in stating “our shared behaviors”. As important as reinforcing desired actions, however, the most effective leaders take the extra step of clarifying the behaviors that will undermine their system to win. What’s more, they act when those behaviors crop up.

Percy Harvin, it appears, wasn’t ready to fully embrace Carroll’s philosophy. Harvin’s numbers were an asset, but Carroll had a system to win and every player or assistant coach in the organization is part of that system. They are either accelerating it or impeding it. What does a leader do when behaviors undermine the agreed strategy?

That’s a leadership call and a tough one. Often, business leaders are slow to address behaviors. “It’s easy to become enamored of someone’s skill sets even though they are a bit of a cancer,” Dermott O’Brien, CHRO of ADP, told us recently. Effective leaders often use a kind of “stress test” to hold themselves and their teams accountable, by asking the question: what specific behaviors hold us back?

To be clear, in athletics just as in business, plenty of organizations fail even to self-administer this test, let alone address it with full candor. The results of such avoidance (think of Penn State alone) can be devastating.

The Three Questions

Ultimately, history and Seattle’s owners will decide whether Pete Carroll’s system is the right winning combination for the Seahawks. Just as a board will hold a CEO accountable to the decisions he or she has made. As former ABC and Disney executive Bruce Gordon said to us last year about senior-level roles, “You don’t own these jobs, you rent them.”

There is no single approach to winning. But great leaders in nearly any complex organization today can cut a path through the fog of possibilities by driving clarity around three questions:

· What game are we playing?
· Are we clear on our system to win?
· What are we doing about the behaviors that hold us back?

Organizations whose leaders address these questions – and whose teams can not only tackle the subjects but also hold themselves accountable to their answers – are the organizations delivering performance that sustains over time.

– Co-authored by Harry Feuerstein of Merryck & Co

'Rapebait' Frat Encouraged Sexual Violence, Lawsuits Claim

A member of a Georgia Tech fraternity sexually assaulted two women using the playbook described in a “luring your rapebait” email, two lawsuits filed this week against Phi Kappa Tau claim.

The Phi Kappa Tau fraternity’s response to the lawsuits insists the attorneys for the reported rape victims are exploiting the “hypersensitivity of today’s college environment toward sexual assault.”

The Alpha Rho chapter of PKT turned a blind eye to red flags that brothers were encouraging each other to sexually assault women, the suits allege, including the “rapebait” email, songs joking about sexual violence, and chapter meeting minutes declaring “rape is good.” The two suits contain nearly identical allegations but each is filed on behalf of a different plaintiff.

The chapter was suspended by the university for three years in April 2014 after a member circulated instructions in an email for “luring rapebait.” Using crude language, the email encouraged members to provide large amounts of alcohol to women in an attempt to hook up with them.

The lawsuits, filed in Fulton County State Court in Georgia this week by B.J. Bernstein and Douglas Fierberg of Washington’s Bode & Fierberg, LLP, say the “rapebait” email was one of many instances of misogyny in the Alpha Rho house.

The suits claim an unnamed PKT member in January raped a woman, Jane Doe, more or less following the description laid out in the “rapebait” email — he and other fraternity members “plied” her with a large amount of alcohol until she blacked out. The same PKT brother followed the same protocol when he sexually assaulted another young woman, June Doe, who was physically incapacitated from alcohol in November 2012 at a fraternity-sponsored event, according to the suits.

Three days after the assault is said to have occurred, Jane Doe reported it to university police, who photographed bruises and marks that remained visible on her neck, breast, thigh and back.

Other evidence of misogyny in the PKT frat presented in the lawsuit include the lyrics of a song members would sing:

Who can take a bicycle
Tear off the seat
Impale a virgin on it, and push her down a bumpy street.
The S&M man.

Who can take a tight slut
F*** her ‘till she cries
Then pull it out real fast and skeet into her eyes

The following lyrics were distributed to fraternity members through a listserv, to be sung at the house’s 2012 Christmas party, according to the lawsuits:

We put her in a wooden box
She died from sucking Phi Tau cocks!

We dig her out every now and then.
She f***ed us once, she’ll f*** us again

According to the lawsuits, the Alpha Rho chapter maintained a “conquest board” of women the members slept with, and passed it on from class to class.

In a statement from PKT Communication Director Tyler Wash, the fraternity noted it shut down the chapter when it found out the Alpha Rho house had violated organizational policies and that “a possible sexual assault had occurred.” But Wash also seemed to question whether either woman was raped, and said the attorneys were inappropriately linking the “rapebait” email with sexual violence.

“The Fraternity is disappointed that the plaintiffs’ attorneys chose to exploit the hypersensitivity of today’s college environment toward sexual assault by drafting the complaints in a manner that sensationalizes completely inappropriate statements, while at the same time alleging that a Georgia Tech student committed criminal rapes of two different women,” Wash said.

The national office for PKT did not respond to multiple follow-up requests about their statement.

In addition to the Phi Kappa Tau organization, the suit names fraternity chapter adviser Robert Tobey and the Alpha Rho house as defendants. The university is not named as a defendant.

Tobey, the suit claims, was in charge of supervising the chapter on risk management and was present at meetings where members made statements like “rape is good.” He did not respond to a request for comment. Neither did other officials and members of the Georgia Tech chapter.

Taking My Body Back From Bipolar, One Bite at a Time

To say that I was concerned with weight and my body from an early age is the understatement of the century. At 10 years old, I noticed that my body was “fuller” than the other girls in leotards at dance class, and decided to start dieting. I figured that if I dieted as a young girl, I would not have to worry about being overweight when I was older. I watched my mother struggle with diets (she was not obese, but wanting to take off “baby weight”), and I was determined to not have to do the same as an adult.

What started out as eliminating sweets and desserts eventually became restricting all of my food, and very anorexic-like behavior. By the time I was in seventh grade, I weighed 74 pounds, the same weight that I was in fifth grade. I was very proud of this fact. And, I felt that I finally could be proud of the body that was contained in my leotard. I remember one of my peers asking me in dance class, “Don’t you love your body? You’re so thin!” and feeling triumphant.

But, in many ways, my life was beginning to spiral downward emotionally. I was extremely moody and depressed behind closed doors. I cried often, and for no reason. Well, actually, there was a reason. I was starving myself. I remember cutting my peanut butter and jelly sandwich into bite-sized pieces and eating them slowly. I remember counting out 10 pieces of popcorn and letting that be my only snack. I remember how hungry I was, and how I relished that feeling of hunger, because I felt in control.

In high school, I weighed 96 pounds during my senior year. I was obsessed with diet and exercise, going to the gym for hours, and eating very little. Then, something life-altering happened: I was diagnosed as bipolar during my first semester at college. And, with this, extremes became the norm for my life, especially extremes around food and eating. I binged. I purged through exercise. Food still had a hold on me, but now, I was using extreme quantities to numb the intense emotions that bipolar brought out in me. I put on about 25 pounds, which horrified me, but I could not stop eating. Still, exercise was my friend, and I maintained my weight as a result of hours of exercise.

Fast forward. I graduated college and started working, and then went to graduate school. In graduate school, I ran about five miles as many times a week as possible, and also lifted weights. I also went on a strict diet and lost about 25 pounds. I loved my body again. But, it didn’t last. After graduate school, a combination of failed relationships, work stress, little time, and a back injury all curtailed my fitness routine, and I began bingeing again.

And then, the worst happened. Because I was so depressed, my doctor insisted that I go on a medication for bipolar known for weight gain. I gained 100 pounds in the space of about six months. It was horrible. To be a young, single woman of 5’3″ tipping the scales at 216 pounds was not fun. I seriously contemplated suicide and did not want to leave the house. I remember my students and other teachers at my school asking me if I was pregnant. One person even went as far as to ask me when the baby was due, and if I had a name for it yet. I hated seeing people that I hadn’t seen since I was thin. It was embarrassing and awful. I blamed myself, and hated how I looked. And I could not stop eating.

Weight gain associated with medications for mental illness is very common. It is one of the reasons why people with serious mental illness die on average 25 years earlier than the rest of the population. I was becoming a statistic, and fast. My tests at the doctor, which had always been perfect, were now not-so-perfect. Higher cholesterol, pre-diabetes, and sleep apnea had become my new diagnoses.

I tried diet after diet, and nothing worked. I was always hungry and craving the most calorie-laden, fatty foods possible, and in large quantities. Food became my lover, my best friend, and certainly my drug of choice.

I knew that I was an addict, so I tried a 12-step program for food addiction, and was not successful with that either. I went to meetings, but I could not stick to the food plan. Finally, I gave up trying all together. And then, something shifted. I started to accept myself as I was. I started to try to look at my body lovingly, and take care of myself the best way I could. I went after my career dreams. I took my focus off of me, and really worked with others. I made my mission helping other people to overcome mental illness and the struggles associated with it. And, I became proud of who I was as a person.

Four months ago, I decided to go back to the 12-step program. I felt more ready to do what they were requiring of me: going off of sugar, flour, and wheat, writing to my sponsor, going to meetings, etc. And, while I certainly am not perfect at any of this, the weight is finally coming off. I’m letting go of resentments quickly so that I don’t eat over them. I’m batch cooking my meals so that I have healthy options to eat during my busy work week. I’m exercising again — yesterday I took a Zumba class, my first dance class in a few years. I had stopped because I hated looking at myself in the mirror. But, I did it, and I felt proud afterwards. I have a pedometer, which counts my steps and miles. Little by little, I have lost about 25 pounds so far, and am keeping it off.

The hardest part has been the self-esteem blow that gaining 100 pounds has given me. I am learning, slowly, to be kinder to myself, and not beat myself up. I was taking that medication in the hopes that I could become better. I was eating because I was in pain, and I was not exercising because I was injured. I wasn’t just being lazy or not taking care of myself.

The weight gain has also taught me a thing or two. First, you are not your body, you are your heart and soul. And, while having a healthy body is important, the most important thing is to be a good person and contribute to the world. I learned to love myself for who I was on the inside. I also learned not to judge people who are overweight or have gained weight. You never know the reason behind the weight gain, you never know another person’s story. Besides learning to be more compassionate to others, I learned that I could be proud of myself just for being me. I have found that the more I accept myself, the more I’m able to stick to my program and kick food addiction out of my life. I’m determined not to become a statistic. And, I’m determined to take my body back, one bite at a time.

Have a story about mental illness or eating disorders that you’d like to share? Email strongertogether@huffingtonpost.com, or give us a call at (860) 348-3376, and you can record your story in your own words. Please be sure to include your name and phone number.

Need help? In the U.S., call 1-800-273-8255 for the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline.

If you’re struggling with an eating disorder, call the National Eating Disorder Association hotline at 1-800-931-2237.

Now for the Reforms

This is a guest post by Valerie Wirtschafter, a Research Associate in the Latin America Studies Program at the Council on Foreign Relations. Valerie previously worked on global health issues in Brazil.

Up until the clock struck 6:00 p.m. (EST) Sunday night, the 2014 presidential election in Brazil had the makings of a compelling Globo telenovela. It was frustrating. It was tragic. It was slanderous. It was exciting. It was scandalous.

Soon after, it was arguably for naught. With 95 percent of votes counted, Dilma Rousseff secured a second term, and the protest movement that consumed many Brazilians in 2013 appeared to now be an afterthought. It was as if the clock had simply wound back to when she won her first term in 2010, except this time the economy was growing at nowhere near 7.5 percent.

It is no secret that many Brazilians were disappointed by both options at the ballot box. Some chose to vote for four more years of Dilma in order to maintain the status quo rather than risk disastrous change. She may not be the best, but Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva will return soon enough. Others pushed back, believing anyone but Dilma would be better for Brazil. They were sorely disappointed by the final result–51.6 percent for Dilma to Aecio Neves’s 48.4 percent–the closest margin of victory in the history of Brazil’s modern democracy.

Now that the hotly anticipated election has come and gone, there is no place to look but forward. Though it may seem like the calls for better and more during the 2013 protests fell hollow at the ballot box this year, like most things in Brazil, progress is unhurried but constant. The road ahead will be wrought with challenges, and the people who took to the streets last year–those that now feel their efforts were in vain–guide the way. In a campaign where change was an empty buzzword used by both candidates, one thing is certain: Dilma will have to make a visible effort to deliver on her promises for reform.

Presumably, the new middle class that took to the streets in droves–flush with access to consumption but frustrated by a lack of true citizenship–will only continue to expand, as more and more Brazilians are lifted out of poverty by Worker’s Party (PT) programs, including the much-discussed Bolsa Familia. The PT will have to adapt to keep pace with their evolving demands or risk losing their votes altogether. After all, polling data from the second round revealed the higher a person’s socioeconomic status, the more likely they were to vote against the PT.

Given the increased polarization in Congress, Dilma is already operating at a disadvantage. Congress is more divided than ever before, and the opposition party’s claws are out and sharpened. With the Petrobras scandal looming over Dilma’s head, calls for impeachment are muted for now but could become more impassioned, should she be implicated. However, two critical areas for reform that cross narrow partisan divides in Brazil’s overwhelmingly leftist government–healthcare and education–could help cultivate continued support from the new middle class and improve the overall quality of life for all Brazilians.

For even the most zealous PT supporter, poor quality healthcare is a universally acknowledged problem in Brazil. Medical professionals who service the Unified Health System (SUS) are paid half as much as those working in the private sector, providing little incentive for doctors to continue working in the public health system. Dilma recently attempted to address the dearth of doctors by launching the program Mais Medicos (More Doctors) to bring foreign doctors–most controversially from Cuba–to service the SUS in remote areas of Brazil. However, this is only a short-term fix to a long-term problem. In order to modernize Brazil’s health system, the government should incentivize doctors to remain a part of the SUS and encourage more Brazilians to graduate with medical degrees.

Perhaps more consequential, but less heavily scrutinized, is education reform. It is not enough to tout her small program Ciencia Sem Fronteiras (Science without Borders) as proof of Dilma’s commitment to this issue anymore. PRONATEC–a program that expands access to vocational and technical education–will not solve Brazil’s problems either. Instead, it is time for Dilma to go back to basics.

In Brazil’s public schools, resources are scarce and teachers are poorly compensated. Low-quality, public primary school means less wealthy Brazilians who cannot afford private school are uncompetitive for free universities, which are paradoxically of a higher quality than private universities. Only a commitment to improving the conditions of education professionals and students will encourage a better public school system. By addressing this issue head on, poverty and crime rates–two other major issues in Brazil–will also decline.

While these reforms will be challenging, if Dilma does not make serious policy adjustments to support the new middle class, she will inadvertently sabotage her own success by alienating former beneficiaries of PT programs. Though Lula’s popularity is still unparalleled, her failure to reform could potentially hurt his all-but-certain 2018 presidential bid.

Dilma’s mandate is far from decisive, and her critics will be more vocal than ever before over the next four years. In a region where just two incumbents have been denied reelection in the past twenty-four years, Dilma’s margin of victory is only larger than that of Nicolas Maduro, the far less charismatic heir to an ailing Venezuela. 48.4 percent of the population may have voted for Aecio, but in reality 48.4 voted for anyone but Dilma (the number is even higher if you count those who did not vote at all).

With a new four year mandate, Dilma has been given one last opportunity to shape modern Brazil as much as her predecessors. If she prefers for her legacy to not include “president who finally kicked the PT out of Planalto Palace after sixteen years in power,” she’d be wise to make good on her promises.