An Open Letter to My Daughter the Princess

My darling daughter,

As we approach your 14th birthday, it is with great trepidation and anxiety that I write this letter to you. I am so proud of the young lady you have become, but I feel I am fighting against the clock to instill in you the life lessons I hold so dear. With only four years remaining until you’re off to college, my intention is for this letter to serve as a tangible reference as you begin your journey into young adulthood.

As you read this, I’d like you to keep in mind these words: “I am a gift. I am a princess. I am royalty.” These words are more than an affirmation. They are indeed fact. As little girls we indulge in delightful fantasies that we are already fairytale princesses.

2014-10-29-JaealanaPrincess.jpg

However, as we mature and absorb society’s standards, our mindsets change and we become somewhat ashamed that we ever thought ourselves special or extraordinary.

The differences between what I faced when I turned 14 and what you face today bring me such disquietude. You see, in my formative years, there was no social media, no twerking videos, no Basketball Wives, no Sharkeisha, no WorldStarHipHop, no Instagram models, no Tinder, no texting. We did not have sex tapes propelling women to instant stardom or elevating them to role-model status.

That said, please know that I am not persecuting your generation. I only want to emphasize that regardless of what you may be exposed to, you, my dear, are still indeed a princess. When you think of yourself as royalty, what is commonplace will fall beneath your majestic stature. My utmost desire is for you to establish your independence, for you to be covered in the love of your Creator, and for you to understand that the future and all that it holds has been predestined for you — and that includes the prince of your dreams.

Aha! Dating. Yes, I know, this is the part you’ve been waiting for, especially if you’re a hopeless romantic. I thought of you when, thumbing through YouTube videos, I stumbled upon a proposal video that stands above all others, aptly titled “Kingdom Proposal.” It starts out like a motion picture trailer. The story introduces Stephon Chaney as the protagonist who, after living a secular existence for much of his young adult life, gave his life to God. For doing so, he was blessed with meeting Christina Segarra. As the introduction plays, the audience is treated to Stephon’s testimony, which reveals all that Christina means to him. Fade to black. We transition to the present day and find ourselves at the One Lens Film Festival of One Church International. Christina is seated in the audience, watching the trailer. She is overwhelmed with joy as she watches Stephon take a stage microphone and proclaim, “Let’s make a movie, Christina.” She then joins him down front for those last four words: “Will you marry me?”

This was certainly a fairytale, and Christina was a modern-day princess. I was so entranced that I reached out to her for inspiration. Her statement to young girls is simply this:

All young women are royalty, and we all deserve that moment when our prince appears, asking for our hand in marriage. Stephon and I saved ourselves for each other, something uncommon in today’s society. The reward in knowing the person whom God has designed for me is truly a blessing.

I should note that this is not your typical iPhone-filmed engagement. Hollywood director Ronny Law created “Kingdom Proposal.” Can you imagine what else her prince has in store? This is just the beginning of their tale.

You see, my dear, you truly reap what you sow, so with that I say this: Sow unto yourself. Hold true to your values and virtue. Your future is brighter than any fairytale!

Love,
The queen

2014-10-29-Princessandthequeen.jpg

Kurdish soccer team sparks Swedish FA ire over battle for Kobani, sparks debate on what is politics?

By James M. Dorsey

When Ramazan Kizil established Dalkurd FF, one of Europe’s most successful immigrant soccer teams, in a remote town in northern Sweden, he dreamt of one day raising the Swedish and the Kurdish flag alongside one another in a European championship. These days, Mr. Kizil’s goals are more immediate: aiding embattled Kurdish fighters fending off attacks by Islamic State, the jihadist group that controls a swath of Syria and Iraq, in the Syrian-Turkish border town of Kobani.

Mr. Kizil’s Dalkurd sparked anger in the Swedish Football Federation (SFF), further fuelled debate within the international sports community about the relationship between sports and politics, and focused attention on the blowback of conflict in the Middle East and North African on migrant communities in Europe, when the club flashed a sign saying ‘Save Kobani’ during a recent soccer match. The club based in Borlänge, an iron and paper mill town 300 kilometres north of Stockholm, raised €3,000 during the match for Kobani that has been a focus of the US-led war on the Islamic State for more than a month.

Against the backdrop of efforts by International Olympic Committee (IOC) president Thomas Bach to acknowledge the intimate relationship between sports and politics in a break with the sport world’s long-standing insistence that the two are separate, Mr. Kizil described his club’s support for Kobani in an interview with Rudaw as “human solidarity.” In response to the SFF’s description of the support for Kobani as “political,” Mr Kizil retorted: “We do not care about their warnings or any eventual penalties.” Adil Kizil, Ramazan Kizil’s son and Dalkurd’s sports manager added: “We can’t just sit and watch while Kobani gets massacred. We must do something.” Some 200,000 people have fled Kobani mostly to Turkey in the last six weeks.

The dispute over the nature of Dalkurd’s support for Kobani raises the question of what the border line is, if there is one, between humanitarian and political aid to groups in distress as a result of conflict as well as the double standards applied by some Western nations towards foreign fighters in the Syrian conflict. Most Western nations have sought to criminalize those of their nationals who join Islamic State as foreign fighters. Some like the Netherlands, however, appear to exempt those who join the Kurds in their fight against the Islamist group.

The distinction between good and bad foreign fighters is likely to loom ever larger. Dalkurd’s support for the Kurdish fight against Islamic State reflects a new resolve among Kurds across Europe as well as a revival of Kurdish hopes for independence. Across Scandinavia, home to many Kurds, groups have demonstrated for Kobani and sought to aid the US-backed Kurdish fighters trying to hold on to the city.

Scores of young German Kurds have joined the outlawed Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), a group that long championed the ideal of a pan-Kurdish state that would be carved out of Kurdish regions in Turkey, Iraq, Syria and Iran. The group — condemned by Turkey, the European Union and the United States as a terrorist organization — has since lowered its sites to demanding full rights within Turkey in stalled negotiations with the Turkish government.

Sabri Ok, a PKK leader, recently told German magazine Der Spiegel: “The new generation is different from us older people. They are more radical. They have seen the war in Kurdistan and their brothers and sisters have died in Syria. It will be difficult to control them.” For many Kurds, the battle for Kobani, once a secular, democratic Kurdish-governed enclave, represents their aspirations. The fall of Kobani, PKK officials warn, would fuel Kurdish resistance and could revive the Kurdish insurgency in south-eastern Turkey in which some 40,000 people have died since 1984.

The changing Kurdish landscape was highlighted this week with Turkey allowing a convoy of 150 vehicles carrying heavy weaponry and armed Iraqi Kurdish Peshmerga fighters to traverse its territory en route to Kobani to strengthen their Syrian Kurdish brethren.

Dalkurd, one of three Swedish clubs that have fielded Europe’s most successful immigrant teams, was initially launched as a project to create jobs for youth. Dalkurd’s Swedish identity is clearly identifiable on maps; its minority Kurdish identity is not. That makes Dalkurd as much a product of the social and economic challenges facing immigrants in Sweden and elsewhere in Europe as it is of the carve-up of the Ottoman Empire in the early 20th century that turned Kurds into the largest nation without a homeland, and scattered them across the Middle East and the globe.

Dalkurd’s initial players were Kurdish migrants and refugees, and their descendants. Turkish Kurdish immigrants moved to Europe in search of more fertile economic pastures and to escape the suppression of their cultural identity and political rights in Turkey. Dalkurd co-founder Elvan Cicen said instinctively, the founders had thought of naming the club Kurdistan, but on reflection opted for Dalkurd: Dal for Dalarna, the region where Borlänge is located, and Kurd for Kurdistan. Dalarna’s famous wooden horses frame the yellow sun on the red, white and green Kurdish flag that the club
adopted as its own.

“We are both Kurdish and Swedish. Football is our tool to integrate people. We took kids off the streets and away from the gangs. Everybody blamed the kids. But the real problem was the parents, who often were analphabets. The kids lived in different worlds in school and at home. The parents didn’t see what was happening and the kids weren’t integrated. We started involving the parents,” Mr. Cicen said. Dalkurd players have become role models in local high schools. They have sparked a cultural revolution, inspiring girls to form their own team with the support of Dalkurd managers who seek to overcome the objections put forward by conservative parents.

In interviews, Kurdish members of Dalkurd’s board do not hide their empathy for the PKK. Officials in Iraqi Kurdistan, where the PKK has bases, suggested that the group had helped fund Dalkurd, a claim the club’s executives deny. Nevertheless, Dalkurd chairman Kizil, a Kurdish immigrant from Turkey, was sentenced in 2010 in absentia to 10 months in prison in his homeland after giving a speech in his native Kurdish and campaigning on behalf of a pro-Kurdish political party.

Dalkurd’s leadership, much like that of other immigrant communities, draws a distinction between integration and assimilation. “Integration is not assimilation. It’s learning a new culture without losing one’s own. Even if we had Kurdistan, I wouldn’t move there. Sure, my parents didn’t come here to be Swedes. They socialise only with the Kurdish part of Dalkurd. I’m trying to learn from both cultures. Having two cultures is being richer. We would lose if we were only a Kurdish team. They call us the Kurdish national team. That is not a problem but we don’t close the door to other people,” Mr. Cicen said.

James M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies as Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, co-director of the Institute of Fan Culture of the University of Würzburg and the author of the blog, The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer, and a forthcoming book with the same title.

In Big-Money Move, Corporations Seek to Make Congress a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary

As Election Day approaches, two reports show us exactly how corrupted our political system has become. Unless voters come out in force, it looks like corporate money is about to buy itself another house of Congress.

The Wall Street Journal analyzed filings from the Federal Election Commission and concluded that

In a significant shift, business groups gave more money to Republican candidates than to Democrats in seven of the most competitive Senate races in recent months, in some cases taking the unusual step of betting against sitting senators.

The Journal found that corporate PACs gave most of their donations to Democrats in the early part of the campaign. That fits with a longstanding pattern: big-business interests shower incumbents with money to encourage special treatment, both during the election year and in the upcoming term.

But giving has shifted dramatically since June. The Journal discovered that Republican candidates received the lion’s share of corporate campaign contributions in the July-to-September time period. The cash-generating power of incumbency had faded – for Democrats.

One reason for the shift, according to sources, is a sense that Democrats are the underdogs. “Wall Street expects return on investment,” a brokerage executive told the Journal. “It makes no sense to contribute to a losing campaign.”

The other reason, of course, is ideologically-based. Corporations feel more comfortable abandoning incumbent Democrats than they do turning their backs on more reliably loyal Republicans. Mitch McConnell has been awash in corporate cash this year, for example – thanks to his far-right stance, his chances of re-election, and the position of influence he would hold as Majority Leader if the GOP captures the Senate.

In a related report, Public Citizen analyzed the flow of “dark money” (from groups which don’t have to disclose their donors) and found that the United States Chamber of Commerce,the largest dark-money spender, “is leaving a huge footprint in almost every race it enters.”

As of October 25, the Chamber had spent $31.8 million on House and Senate races. The second-largest dark-money spender, Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS, had spent $23.5 million. Other big-spending dark-money groups include “Patriot Majority USA,” the extremist “Americans for Prosperity,” and the National Rifle Association.

2014-10-30-DARKMONEY.jpg

Public Citizen found that the Chamber was “the biggest spender among non-disclosing outside groups in 28 of 35 races in which it has gotten involved. It is the second-biggest non-disclosing spender in three races, and the third-biggest dark money spender in four races.”

This dark money is being spent in as lopsided a manner as that of the business PACs analyzed by the Wall Street Journal, with Public Citizen concluding that “almost all of the money the Chamber has spent has gone to aid Republicans or hinder Democrats … The Chamber has not spent any money supporting Democrats.”

The Nation’s George Zornick (who we interviewed about the election last week on The Zero Hour) notes that “the Chamber is a 501(c)(6) tax-exempt organization, meaning it doesn’t have to disclose its donors.” Zornick adds that publicly-available data reveals that “much of the Chamber’s money has generally come from titans in the oil, banking and agriculture industries, among others.”

In the past, many Congressional Democrats were able to count on the power of incumbency to trump party affiliation or the “liberal” label when it came time to collect corporate cash. But as Republicans have become increasingly shameless in their subservience to business interests – remember “Washington is here to serve the banks“? – corporations may sense that the time is coming when no longer need to compromise with government at all. From the Wall Street Journal:

“It’s increasingly likely we’re going to reestablish a pro-business majority in the Senate,” said Rob Engstrom, national political director of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which mostly backs conservative candidates. He said President Barack Obama and other party leaders had made Democratic candidates “vulnerable, so companies aren’t going to write PAC checks to candidates who fundamentally don’t represent their interests.”

If the incumbents in Washington haven’t been representing corporate interests effectively, it’s hard to imagine who could. Both corporate profits and the personal wealth of the 1 percent soared in the aftermath of a financial crisis which left most Americans worse off than ever before.

Perhaps Engstrom meant to say “companies aren’t going to write PAC checks to candidates who don’t solely represent their interests.” From the looks of things, Corporate America is no longer content with buying political influence. Now it wants to turn Congress into a wholly-owned subsidiary. And it may well succeed, unless the voters thwart them on Tuesday.

For Democrats in Congress, perhaps the moral of the story is this: Don’t chase their money, because they’ll still betray you in the end – just like they did on Social Security. Instead of kowtowing to them, fight them. You may not be able to outspend your opponents, but that option seems to be disappearing anyway. At least that way you’ll have the voters on your side.

For the American people, the moral of this story couldn’t be clearer: If we don’t get money out of politics, we’ll lose our democracy altogether.

Cli-Fi is Real

When I first popularized cli-fi in 2009, it was initially inspired by Franny Armstrong’s docu-film The Age of Stupid, a work of science and fiction. Starring the late, great Pete Postelthwaite as a melted Arctic-bound archivist of a humanity that dumbly extincted itself (verb intended), Armstrong’s patient multimedia proved the boundary between what is environmental science and what is cultural narrative has always been what William Gibson described in his foundational Neuromancer as a “consensual hallucination.” He was speaking of the cyberspace in which we all now create ourselves, a floating fiction wherein we inhabit avatars and collectively build a multiverse with an actual future.

But as both climate science and science-fiction have lately warned, Earth does not have a future. And neither do we.

This existential bleed is of course the reason that Christopher Nolan’s cli-fi epic Interstellar reportedly feels like a documentary struggling with a blockbuster, as it wrestles with a titanic human species trying to survive its hyperconsumption and narcissism, on a fucking lucky rock spinning through space. It’s also why continuing reports from the too-conservative Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are treated like fiction by sellouts, and always exponentially worse. The latest (finally) explains that global warming is abrupt and irreversible, and that our children will inherit an Anthropocene riven by swallowing seas, searing permadroughts and mass extinction for species of all shapes and sizes.

But both are real, and both are cli-fi.

Cli-fi is not a listicle of films or shows or books or whatever, which take so-called climate change — a political euphemism created to denature global warming’s knockout punch — as their thematic center. Speaking of sellouts, cli-fi is also the near-universal assent of scientists and their studies, which reactionaries laugh off as a hard sell while they pocket payoffs from fossil fools trying to sustain the unsustainable hallucinations of the 20th century. Like the American Dream, the New Deal, the Great Society, globalization, sci-fi itself, all on fading life support as Earth perhaps transforms into Venus. That’s the nightmare haunting Stephen Hawking, who cli-fi analysts should note is a scientific visionary who can only communicate through a computer.

That we have been sleepwalking through such massive destabilization for decades proves that we are much better at consensually hallucinating than we are at separating our sciences and fictions. Indeed, we rule at creating facts first as fictions, so we can resume our consuming ways, avoiding apocalyptic spoiler alerts.

And so we fashion for ourselves mirrors and panopticons specifically to monitor and experience ourselves — in the third person, where Reality reportedly cannot touch us — as we live and die. Cli-fi, like sci-fi and fantasy and spy-fi and psy-fi and so many more, is simply the cultural prism through which we monitor and experience ourselves as we bleed our planet dry while trying to become machines capable of continuing once our galactic luck runs out. Pointing out what is and what is not cli-fi is like pointing out what is and is not cli-sci: It misses both the forest and its deforested trees.

We have always clung to our paradise in space, so we have always been cli-fi, as much as we have tried to ignore it in our programming and profiteering.

Of course Nolan’s studio blockbuster Interstellar is cli-fi, but so is artistry you rarely see making media headlines or cultural histories. Michael Dante DiMartino and Bryan Konietzko’s brilliant animated series The Legend of Korra is a postmodern treatise on our technocultural struggle to achieve an elemental balance between the natural world we’re manipulating and its apocalyptic consequences. It’s a sobering all-ages epic anchored by the most powerful female character on television — which is why it didn’t survive television and is now solely distributed online, where it competes on our laps, pads and phones with cli-fi like The Wachowskis’ Matrix trilogy, Cosmos 1.0 and 2.0, Tolkien’s transmedia Lord of the Rings, Silent Running and The Road and The Walking Dead and Game of Thrones and even Star Wars itself.

Laugh at the ad nauseam, if you must, but try for example arguing whether Star Wars is fantasy or sci-fi with fandom and you’ll quickly realize that these distinctions mean little when applied to the Real World. It is, after all, Harrison Ford, Han Solo himself, who menacingly reminds us that “Every living thing on this planet needs me” while voicing The Ocean in Conservation International’s recent star-studded Nature is Speaking awareness campaign. But it is also Ford who comes off as a “smug, contemptuous and cantankerous” First Worlder in the also star-studded global warming miniseries Years of Living Dangerously, as he lectures post-Suharto Indonesians about “inequity, illegality and corruption” as First Worlders deforest Indonesia to crisis. And it is also the quite wealthy Ford who has paid into a dirty political campaign — assisted by the controversial Arno Political Consultants, whose previous clients include the NRA and oil companies — to continue allowing a money-pit airport in Santa Monica to pollute and crash into its neighbors, who would much rather have a park, thanks. At this point, we can’t even discuss whether Disney, which now owns Han Solo outright, has truly changed its devastating deforestation ways.

These dizzying contradictions bleed in too from the other side of cli-fi’s cultural prism, in so-called Reality, where everything is going to literal hell, science be damned. A perceptible documentary like Margaret Brown’s award-winning The Great Invisible, which sifts through the land and lives wrecked by Halliburton and British Petroleum’s oily Deepwater Horizon fuck-up, probably sounds like a fairy tale to BP’s great communicator Geoff Morrell, the Department of Defense ex-press secretary who recently, infamously argued that, “No, BP Didn’t Ruin the Gulf.” Morrell might be happier with the perhaps more conventionally heroic retcon of Deepwater Horizon, starring Mark Wahlberg, whose last vehicle Lone Survivor was called a “jingoistic snuff film” by LA Weekly‘s Amy Nicholson. Deepwater Horizon is a fiction that might have more facts than The Great Invisible, for someone in Morrell’s compromised state.

You might as well include with these extractivist rewrites director Erik Skjoldbjærg’s Pioneer, which is marketed as a conspiracy thriller about the Norwegian oil boom of the ’80s. That boom’s real-world disaster capitalism, according to the also compromised Tony Blair, was “utterly essential” to the “electoral success” of Margaret Thatcher, who is herself a vehicle for rapacious conservatism most impressively dissected in Adam Curtis‘ docuseries The Living Dead, which screens like a surreal fantasy. All of these exercises, in turn, roughly collide with the aptly named Extreme Realities: Severe Weather, Climate Change and Our National Security, the new Matt Damon-narrated episode of Journey to Planet Earth, a PBS series premised on the (correct) assumption that viewers really need to take a trip to the planet they already live on — through Afghanistan’s Taliban and Kenya’s drought to doomed Bangladesh and burning Russia — to understand what is real and what is not.

From The Living Dead to The Walking Dead, and back and beyond, all of these fantasies of terror and terraformation, in a world gone mad with environmental destruction and voracious consumption, are cli-fi’s chameleon skins.

This is why politicians, scientists, spokespeople and other paid actors sound satisfied when voicing no-shit-Sherlock absurdities like “Climate change is real” and “The science isn’t settled” — as if we truly wanted real change or settled science, when they so painfully interfere with our desires and addictions. The most apocalyptic cli-fi in recent memory is indeed the IPCC’s AR5, which is less of a road map out of the planetary hell of our own making than a rerun of how we got here for anyone paying attention to our downward spiral. To get reductive about it, scientists often look backwards, clouded by funding and excuses, while artists often look forward, captivated by cash and fame.

This is why the mainstream talks as if Nolan’s Interstellar and the IPCC’s AR5 are somehow separate, as if they existed on different planets, on either side of a self-aware divide, when they are nothing of the sort after all the votes for hope and change are finally counted.

Because the fact is that we live in an exponentially warming world where the IPCC routinely underestimates its catastrophic predictions, even though political and economic elites dependent upon dirty fuels pay to propagandize its apocalyptic mirror as way too fractured. Meanwhile, self-professed “geeks” opine endlessly about whether programming and production about the end of the world as we know it, from Interstellar to The Hunger Games to The Hobbit and back again, can be squashed into labels and genres and marketing specifically created to slice and dice cultural experience into more capitalizable sections. For years, I have called this study of exponential misreading exponology: When it comes to global warming, exponology argues, we are always too slow, too wrong, too often.

Cli-fi fits into this puzzle by annihilating barriers we selfishly erect between science and fiction, between Self and the Other, between our overheating Earth and cold, deep space. Interstellar, like all cli-fi, oscillates between scientific analysis and postmodern pastiche, bowing to 2001: A Space Odyssey, The Wizard of Oz and other big-picture epics about species survival and self-fulfilling evil. Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke’s transmedia 2001 legendarily charted the evolution of Earth’s higher beings just at the beginning of their interstellar journey; Interstellar finds them nearly destroyed by greatly depressing Dust Bowls past and present. This bleed will further intensify when the apartheid, tsunamis and mass extinctions of Clarke’s Childhood’s End arrives next year as a Syfy soap.

So whether they begin as blockbusters, documentaries or scientific studies, cli-fi facts and fictions are continually in flux, as humanity goes about its death-dealing business as usual. Apocalyptic programming is always where we have unsuccessfully stashed our neuroses and psychoses, because we just can’t handle the devolutionary truth. Which is that we have created a climate of terror and terraformation that is spinning out of control, and we don’t want it to stop.

Because stopping would mean unplugging the machines we have become, right now, before it is too late. And I’m sorry, Dave, I’m afraid we can’t do that.

How To Back Hillary Into A Corner

One afternoon in late September, David Plouffe, President Barack Obama’s former campaign manager and most trusted political aide, slipped into Hillary Clinton’s stately red-brick home on Whitehaven Street in Washington, D.C., to lay out his vision for her 2016 presidential campaign. The Clintons have always made a habit of courting their most talented tormenters, so it wasn’t surprising that she would call on the man who masterminded her 2008 defeat as she finds herself besieged by Republicans replaying Plouffe’s greatest hits.

Dance dance dance to the electronica hipsterfest of Bugatti [NSFW]

Dance dance dance to the electronica hipsterfest of Bugatti [NSFW]

Five dry martinis and Tiga’s Bugatti track on repeat. That’s all I need to work and play today. [NSFW for bare breasts and absurd 1980s hipsterfest overload full of old Macintosh computer, phones, arcades, and people in funny clothing.]

Read more…


FAA to drone pilots: fly near big sports events and face prison time

If you have dreams of recording your own aerial footage of a baseball game using a drone, you’ll want to put them on ice. The FAA has issued a warning to all pilots that they’ll be fined or imprisoned if they fly remote-controlled aircraft too close…

Pilot Killed In Military Jet Crash In California

PORT HUENEME, Calif. (AP) — A military jet crashed into a field near a naval base off the Southern California coast on Wednesday, killing the pilot, authorities said.

The plane crashed and disintegrated at around 5:15 p.m. Wednesday near Naval Station Ventura County, sending up a huge plume of billowing black smoke. The Ventura County Fire Department reported the pilot was killed. Nobody on the ground was hurt.

Federal Aviation Administration spokesman Allen Kenitzer said the aircraft was a Hawker Hunter MK.58.

The cause of the crash wasn’t immediately known, nor was it clear if the plane was taking off or attempting to land at the base near the city or Port Hueneme, about 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles.

Kenitzer said the FAA and the National Transportation Safety Board are investigating.

A spokeswoman for Naval Base Ventura County did not immediately respond to phone messages.

The Hawker Hunter is a single-seat fighter-ground attack plane.

In May 2012 another Hawker Hunter crashed into a farm field near the Navy base, killing the pilot. In that instance, Thomas Bennett, 57, was piloting the privately owned jet. His plane had been contracted to play the enemy in training exercises.

In May 2011, three members aboard a Boeing 707 tanker loaded with jet fuel escaped with only minor injuries when their aircraft skidded off the runway while taking off from the base and exploded into flames.

That plane was carrying civilians and had a contract to provide fuel transport.

6 Reasons Why Authenticity Results in More Sales

If you work in sales — in ANY aspect of sales — you are likely always looking for ways to better connect with your customers or clients and sell more.

While there are hundreds of books, podcasts, blogs, videos and magazine articles that promise to help you become the best salesperson you can be, the power to sell is already inside of you.

Selling is all about connecting. Connecting with those who become your customers is the only way you can get that trust you need to make the sale.

How do you connect?

This is a tip you have heard your whole life — from the time you were a child. Be yourself.

When you start researching sales techniques, “being yourself” may not be something that is highly emphasized, but it is highly effective.

Author, sales coach and millionaire David Neagle is just one of many professionals that have only reached the highest pinnacles of success by learning to stick with what works–being himself.

“People listen with their ears, but they hear with their emotions. Our job is to get people to stop listening and start hearing,” explained Neagle.

You don’t have to be the best speaker and you don’t need all the answers. However, you should stay true to your values and have your personality in your sales message.

So, why with all the tips and sales strategies out there would the simple piece of advice to “be yourself” be the magic bullet?

Consider the following reasons why staying true to yourself can be the key to making the sale.

1.) You Don’t Have to Remember a Script

Sales scripts are a way of life for salespeople aren’t they? No matter how well you write your script, they are sure to sound scripted — and if you get off the script?

Often the conversation can never be recovered. When you be yourself instead of working off a script, there is nothing to remember.

You just follow your gut and you can always recover the conversation. This is true even if you wind up discussing football scores or last night’s episode of Dancing with the Stars.

2.) Your Customers Can Feel When You are Genuine

Being genuine can’t be faked. Customers can tell when you are seriously interested in the product or service you are selling and they know when you stand behind them.

Along the same lines, your customers know when you’re being yourself — even if they don’t REALIZE they know this. Your customers are more likely to respond favorably and will more likely come back to you again and again when they see you as a real person or even a friend — instead of just as salesperson.

3.) You Can Have Fun

When you’re following a script or using those tired sales techniques, you don’t get a chance to share anything about who you really are. It’s much more fun to be yourself.

Tell your customers about your own experiences and speak to them like they are a friend, not a prospect.

4.) Conversations Make Conversions

Neagle explained, “If we understand what’s going on under the surface, we can move a sales conversation hundreds of miles down the road because we know what’s happening and we can then ask questions to redirect it in the direction that it needs to go.”

Conversions happen when you least expect it. You may convince this buyer that he or she needs to commit when you’re talking about kids soccer or sharing your experience traveling across Europe.

5.) You Won’t Seem Like a Salesperson

As a general rule, people don’t particularly like salespeople. Think about the jokes about “used car salesmen.” These jokes are generally not flattering in the least.

If you are being yourself, instead of being a sales machine, you are going to seem like an interested party who wants to HELP this customer, not like a salesman who is looking for another commission.

6.) You Can’t Fail

No salesman will make every sale. It’s practically impossible. However, when you’re being yourself you’re not going to fail. You are always going to succeed at being you. The more experience you have in sales, the easier it will be to get those conversions without losing yourself in the process.

No matter what sales strategies you choose to use, do not let yourself become lost behind a smokescreen of techniques.

Once you have embraced the idea of being yourself, you will quickly realize that this simple piece of advice that your kindergarten teacher emphasized will help you make connections and sales — leading you down the path of success just like Mr. Neagle and the others who never compromise who they really are.

RGA Raises More Than $100 Million Under Chris Christie

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — The group dedicated to electing and re-electing Republican governors has now raised more than $100 million on New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s watch.

The Republican Governors Association announced late Wednesday that it has brought in $102 million since Christie took over on Dec. 1, the most of any chair. The group was not required to release the new numbers under any federal guidelines. And they will not be verifiable until December. But they serve as a show of strength in the race’s final stretch.

Republicans are defending 22 of 36 gubernatorial seats that voters will decide on Tuesday.

The group’s Democratic counterpart reported raising $47 million in 2014 through the end of September.