Hagel's Resignation Spells the End of a Once Principled Presidency

The press conference in which President Obama announced the resignation of his Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel was surreal. Most of Obama’s speech dealt with Secretary Hagel’s solid accomplishment. Had I not known this was a resignation speech I would have thought the President was leading up to pinning a medal on Hagel for the great job he was doing!

The hurriedly organized press conference at the White House was quite a scene. As the President lavished praise after praise on his Defense Secretary, Hagel stood silently by his right-side looking uncomfortable but stoic. On the President’s left was Vice-President Joe Biden, a close friend and supporter of Hagel’s who looked visibly distraught. The media cameras were careful not to scan too far over the audience lest the public see the paucity of observers that occupied but a couple of rows of seats to watch the distressing spectacle.

As I watched the President drone on about Hagel’s accomplishments and then watched with real sadness as the former Defense Secretary spoke a few words through stiff lips I could not but think of this moment as the beginning of the end of what was once (or so we all thought) a principled Presidency.

A President that once appeared to have learned the lessons of an over militarized US foreign policy, and been elected on his promise to rectify the excesses of the previous Administration, appears now to have lost his way. Guided by a White House staff that appears increasingly unfit for purpose, the President is reverting back to his predecessors policy of unending wars in countries where the US has been trapped for over a decade.

First in Iraq, and now in Afghanistan the Obama wars are about to take over and relight the dying embers of the failed Bush wars. Instead of leaving his successor a country that had learned the limitations and futility of its military interventions Obama is going to leave his successor and the American people with battles to fight for the next decade and beyond. It is in this context that the departure of Hagel signifies a tragedy, for the Obama Administration, for America, and the world.

Two years ago as a Chuck Hagel nomination for Defense Secretary was being discussed in Washington I wrote in this column:

For the military Hagel would bring, literally, a trench level understanding of how it feels to be a soldier on the front lines. To be ambushed, shot at and see fellow soldiers killed. He is a decorated veteran of Vietnam who left some blood on that vicious battlefield. Someone who instinctively understands what that one percent of Americans who have been and are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan must feel as they rotate through interminable deployments in wars without end in which there are no victories, just death and sorrow. He [Hagel] once wrote,

“As a political leader, you can never predict how war will turn out, only that it will be worse than you thought or planned for. You better be damned sure of your reasons for getting into it… what and why and how you intend to pursue your objectives before you take a nation to war…”

Isn’t this the kind of leader the military needs on their side today, I asked then, celebrating the thought of Chuck Hagel in charge of the Defense Department. And I applauded the President’s subsequent nomination and Hagel’s confirmation to the position.

So it is with enormous sorrow that I watched Hagel’s tenure ended at the half-way mark by a President who seems to have forgotten the pledge he made to Americans when he was elected: to finally craft a sane foreign policy, devoid of hubris, and over-reliance on military solutions. It is also a pledge I am sure he made to Hagel to get him to join the Obama team. It is a sad moment for the country and for the finest military in the world that Obama has not been able to redeem that pledge.

Chuck Hagel will come out this sordid episode bruised but unscathed. Alas, the rest of us, and America, will not.

An Rx for the Common Wedding Cold

I am sneezing in between paragraphs, coughing at the completion of each sentence and wiping my bloodshot eyes as I proofread this column. I see no need to visit the doctor, for I know this horrible cold will pass.

The symptoms always dissipate approximately one week after I have attended a wedding.

I don’t know what it is about an event that bonds two people in holy matrimony, but I always end up sick after partaking in one…and that includes my own. A mere two days after saying, “I do” to the love of my life, the “sickness” of “in sickness and health” took center stage as I spent the next seven days sneezing and expelling phlegm off a Hawaiian balcony. My bride was sympathetic to my plight, collecting tissues and making trips to the gift shop for cold medicine, but I think that’s only because, in 1993, iPhones and mobile apps were a mere glint in Steve Jobs’ eye. Otherwise, she would have been perfectly content to play Candy Crush and eat macadamia nuts on the beach until I felt better.

I’ve even caught summer wedding colds, an illness that garners no sympathy. Tell someone in January that you are suffering from nasal distress and they will offer chicken soup, babysitting services and maybe even a willingness to take your shift driving the weekly car pool. Do the same thing in August and you come off as Wimp #1.

Maybe it’s all that hugging, touching and kissing that goes on during a wedding reception, particularly in the receiving line. A recent study in the biomedical journal Microbiome concluded that 80 million bacteria are transferred during a kiss. It should be noted that the subjects in this study kissed for 10 seconds, an inordinate — and creepy — length of time in a receiving line. Furthermore, the subjects touched tongues. Again, creepy, even if you are an ex who is still on friendly terms with your now married former soulmate.

But even a one second peck for the bride and, possibly, her mother must generate some nasty bacteria. How else to explain my post-wedding acute viral rhinopharyngitis? (Note: Using the scientific name can make you sound like less of a wimp).

Who knows? Maybe I touched an already contaminated individual in the obligatory wedding conga line that snaked through the banquet hall. Or picked up something on the dance floor — and by that I mean the floor itself — when I was one of a hundred or so revelers writhing on the hardwood during the “a little bit softer now, a little bit softer now” portion of Shout. Or didn’t realize I was in line behind the guest who fondles every puff pastry on the hors d’oeuvre tray before choosing one.

Whatever the cause, I need to pinpoint it quick because it won’t be long before weddings make up the bulk of my social life. We all know wedding invitations come in spurts; they begin in your 20s as your high school and college friends take the marital plunge. When children enter the picture, the invites cease, save for those on their second or third go-round. But, in the blink of an eye, your friends’ kids become adults, find their partners and walk down the aisle. It’s just a shame my immune system can’t keep up with the increasing number of celebrations I’ll soon be attending.

How come I never see hand sanitizer or spray at a wedding? I can’t walk 10 feet through an airport, health club or office building without constantly being reminded that disease is lurking throughout and I should take proper precautions. A bottle of Purell next to the guest book could do wonders for my future health.

Perhaps I should start bringing my own line of defense. Donning a surgical mask while waiting to greet the bride and groom may be overdoing it but some antibacterial wipes in my suit pocket should do the trick.

They’ll come in handy when, instead of kissing the bride, I offer a congratulatory, 10-second fist bump.

(c) 2014 GREG SCHWEM. DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC

Elizabeth Warren Spars With Wall Street Over Antonio Weiss

WASHINGTON — Andrew Ross Sorkin has found the problem: there are too few bankers working in government. He has also found the reason there are so few: the senior senator from Massachusetts, Elizabeth Warren, is too rough on them.

The latest offense of Warren’s, Sorkin wrote Monday, is her opposition to the nomination of Antonio Weiss to be Under Secretary of the Treasury for Domestic Finance. “Sadly, Ms. Warren’s denunciation of Mr. Weiss is a reason many talented people in the private sector are unwilling to take on government roles. They worry that, like Mr. Weiss, they will be attacked by what seems like just another campaign talking point,” Sorkin wrote.

The salvo aimed at Warren is part of a campaign to resurrect the nomination of Weiss, which has staggered amid scrutiny of his financial services career at Lazard, a firm that specializes in structured financial transactions, including the politically toxic “corporate inversions.” An inversion allows a corporation to swallow a foreign company and move the legal home of its headquarters offshore to avoid U.S. taxes. Lazard itself is headquartered in Bermuda.

Lazard handled the high-profile Burger King inversion, in which it merged with Canadian chain Tim Hortons, something Warren criticized Weiss for. “While it makes a nice sound bite, Ms. Warren is, to put it politely, mistaken,” Sorkin wrote, going on to state that the deal was “technically an inversion, [but] it isn’t comparable to so many of the cynically constructed deals that were done this year simply to reduce taxes.” It did, however, reduce Burger King’s tax obligation — and of course, Lazard oversaw many of the other “cynically constructed deals” Sorkin acknowledges are worse.

“For what it’s worth, Mr. Weiss opposes the kind of inversions that the Obama administration sought to end,” Sorkin offers.

Politically, that’s not worth much. Weiss has been at Lazard for most of his career and has gotten wealthy as a result. There’s little evidence he did so under any formal protest. Weiss’ apparent objection to the practices of his own firm has not stopped Republicans from slamming the White House.

“This nomination shows the continued hypocrisy of the Obama administration in this area,” Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), a top member of the Finance Committee, said in a statement. “The president has put forward nominees with offshore accounts, which he lambasted on the campaign trail, and now someone who’s been involved in inversion transactions, something he’s referred to as unpatriotic.”

Warren has said she opposes Weiss’ nomination partly because of Lazard’s role in inversions, but also because his experience doesn’t qualify him for the job, the primary role of which, she argues, is to oversee the implementation of Wall Street reform. Sorkin, channeling the argument of Weiss’ Wall Street defenders, said that the responsibility of the job is to oversee Treasury bond sales, and that giving it to the wrong person could drive up borrowing costs.

“Antonio Weiss supporters are being disingenuous in acting like this is a very complicated and technical job focused on capital markets and that nobody else is smart enough to understand it,” said an aide to Warren. “The last person in the role — Mary Miller — was Treasury’s point person on Dodd-Frank implementation and domestic regulatory issues, and there’s just no indication that Weiss has sufficient background to oversee that very important work.”

A Treasury Department spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a request for comment on what, exactly, the job entails. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

The Independent Community Bankers Association is also fighting Weiss over his lack of proper experience. “While Mr. Weiss has impressive credentials as a top Wall Street executive specializing in international mergers and acquisitions, Wall Street is already well represented at Treasury, and the narrow focus of Mr. Weiss’s professional experience is a serious concern for ICBA and community banks nationwide,” ICBA honcho Camden Fine wrote in a letter to the committee.

Weiss has been waiting for his confirmation hearing in the Senate Finance Committee since he was nominated on Nov. 12. HuffPost reached out to Democrats on the committee to see if they plan to support him. Most responded, but nobody said much.

“Not taking a preliminary position before we have a chance for proper review,” said a spokeswoman for Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who chairs the committee. “We look forward to evaluating his nomination.”

Sens. Ben Cardin (D-Md.), Tom Carper (D-Del.) and Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) are all still reviewing Weiss’ nomination, according to their offices. An aide to Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) said he believes Weiss “deserves a fair hearing.”

Wyden has previously said the nomination is unlikely to get a hearing before Republicans take over the chamber in January. Two Democrats on the committee, Sens. Maria Cantwell (Wash.) and Sherrod Brown (Ohio), are strong opponents of inversions and Weiss opponents view them as likely no votes, meaning Weiss would need significant GOP support to move forward.

Aides to those two senators said they are still mulling the nomination.

“No position yet,” said Cantwell spokesman Jared Leopold. “Sen. Cantwell has yet to meet with Mr. Weiss.”

“He has not yet said how he’ll vote,” said Brown spokeswoman Meghan Dubyak. “As a member of both the Senate Finance and Banking Committees, Sen. Brown will be closely reviewing Mr. Weiss’ nomination.”

For now, Weiss is planning one-on-one meetings with senators to try to win their support, and he’s paying a law firm to help guide him through the nomination process. A former administration official who is advising Weiss said it’s more common than one might think for a presidential nominee to hire people to help get them confirmed.

“Especially people who know that they’re going to come under a lot of scrutiny,” said the former official, who requested anonymity to speak freely about the confirmation process. “They get lawyers to help them with that process. It’s very common. Sometimes people volunteer to help, other times people are retained.”

If Weiss does make it out of committee, he will hit some more Democratic opposition on the Senate floor. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), a member of Democratic leadership, has reportedly decided to oppose Weiss. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who caucuses with Democrats, has also said he plans to vote against Weiss because of his deep ties to Wall Street.

“The administration’s basic approach here seemed to be, ‘Well, he’s from Wall Street, so he’ll do. We just need to make the role sound complicated,'” the Warren aide said.

Inhale Love; Exhale Gratitude

“It is through gratitude for the present moment that
the spiritual dimension of life opens up.”
-Eckhart Tolle

Another step that awakens your spirit through adversity is gratitude.

The word “gratitude” comes from the root word gratus(Latin), which means pleasing. One interpretation of gratitude might be that when we are pleased with something or someone, we are grateful. If we look deeper within ourselves, we also might see that when we are feeling grateful, we are pleased with the world around us.

Gratitude reminds us to find our happiness in everything — in exceptional things, in mundane things, in good things, in so-so things and even in terrible things.

Our aches and pains, our new grandchild’s first smile, our moments of doubt and fear, our upbringing, what our teachers thought of us, what our friends think of us, what the state of our retirement plan is, our illness, aging, the process of dying, a phone call from an old friend — all are part of an automatic feedback system directing us to pay attention.

We can be grateful in both large and small ways. When we are feeling thankful, we can be more receptive to making a difference in our world.

When our hearts are open, forgiveness and gratitude evolve simultaneously, each supporting and nurturing the other. Rather than focusing on the “what might have been more, better, or different,” why not start being grateful for what you’ve chosen? In these moments, we find our blessings. And because of our blessings, we are grateful for our lives.

I believe that when people approach the end of their life and know they have only a short time left to live and no time to waste, they open up their hearts more profoundly, knowing they have less, not more, time to live. When I review my life and pay attention to the ways I might have studied a second language or had children or bought that water property in Florida, or my retirement, or traveled to Japan; I stop, slow down, remember who I am, and forgive myself, awakening to the depth of my compassion for myself.

Forgiveness takes on a life of its own. I now have a “bucket list” of what I want to accomplish before I pass on. Writing and completing my book, Wheelchair Wisdom before the end of the year was item #3 on that list!

I am so grateful to my spiritual teachers and my husband, Michael, who have supported me and encouraged me to look inward — deeper and deeper, as I did my best to stay present and share this fantastic journey with you.

I am especially grateful to Michael, who unconditionally supports, believes in and loves me after 35 years of marriage, during most of which I have had Multiple Sclerosis. I know that when I take the time to be grateful, I become more loving, forgiving and respectful. When I am most grateful, I feel connected to the world and I can more easily look for only the good in all people and all events and leave the rest — the responsibility of fixing the broken pieces — to a higher power. It is only then that I can relax and truly cease to judge my own life.

I am also grateful for the simple action of using my thumbs, which I have always taken for granted; and which, in my present reality, I need to operate my electric scooter. I use my right thumb to accelerate my scooter (walk forward), and I use my left thumb to back up my scooter (walk backward). I am grateful for how my fingers grasp things and extend so I can type, or scratch my nose or even put on my lipstick and mascara.

I am grateful for my body. It never ceases to amaze me that my body produces and destroys blood cells every second, and that my heart needs only one minute to pump my blood through my network of cells and tissue and back again. It’s been doing this minute by minute, day by day, for over 65 years. Obviously, this is a matter of life and death for me, but I have no idea how it works; and it seems to work remarkably well in spite of not knowing.

In January 2005, I was with my father in the last few days of his life, and I was reminded yet again that it is true that each of us has only a short time here on earth. Even though my dad was in a coma, I spoke to him. I shared with him everything that I always wanted to say — how thankful I was that he gave me the opportunity to attend art school, how I stole quarters from the top drawer of his dresser when I was little, how he always believed in me and how he refereed the fights between my mother and me. My husband, Michael, is like my father in many ways; and for this, I am grateful for his kindness.

Gratitude is ultimately the work of the heart.

I am prepared. I do not fear death. With the calm, stillness and inner peace I have in my heart, I often wonder if I will have enough time to complete my life to the point where I can say at the end, “I am fulfilled.” But whether I have enough time to attain that fulfillment or not, I am grateful for my life, the people in it, and the opportunities that have been presented to me. I know that whatever comes forward is timed perfectly.

I am grateful for the awareness to know that.

There are times when I must yank on my reins, stop and force myself to be reminded of my blessings. At such times, I look out my office window at the glorious fall foliage on the trees. I must force myself to slow down and enjoy a most glorious sunset. I remind myself to be silent and dwell only in the present moment, knowing it is the only moment there is. In the moment we find our blessings.

And with our blessings come our gratitude and contentment, which also exist in the present, with the self-love that naturally accompanies them.

Wishing you and yours a peaceful Thanksgiving,

Warmly,

Linda

Black Friday Special: My book, Wheelchair Wisdom, is now available on Amazon.

“…A book brimming with fearlessness, optimism, and a sense of possibility.”
-Arianna Huffington, President and Editor-in-chief, The Huffington Post Media Group

Real Husbnds of Hollywood Debuts Fall Season Finale

The Fall finales of many of our favorite shows are taking place this week. BET’s Real Husbands of Hollywood is no exception. I was recently invited to the set to interview its stars Kevin Hart, Duane Martina and guest star Nene Leakes to give us their take on their on scene antics and much that we can expect from the fall finale episode.

Episode 308, “Black Is The Same Old Black,” (aka “The Wives” episode) is an homage of sorts to the popular Netflix series Orange is the New Black. It pits the female costars of Real Husbands against one another in a caper fueled by Duane Martin’s greedy penchant for less than law abiding schemes and made worse by the thieving habits of Regina Hall, Tisha Campbell Martin’s need for control and Cynthia Kaye McWilliams’ less than law abiding hijinks.

Kevin Hart of course sat at the cusp of the on screen mischief, fueling the fire, fanning the flames and causing his share of trouble. But when we went one on one the popular comedian proved to be less than troublesome, insisting on having an assistant present, to let his star shine. Check out my interviews with the cast below and be sure to watch the season three finale of Real Husbands of Hollywood airing tonight on BET.

Real Husbands of Hollywood stars Kevin Hart, Duane Martin, JB Smoove, Nick Cannon, Boris Kodjoe, Cynthia Kaye McWilliams, Nelly, Tisha Martin Campbell, Regina King and more…It airs Tuesdays at 10P/9C on BET Networks.

The Structure Dilemma

Are you a Diamond or Graphite?

Clue? You could be either. It’s all a matter of organisation.

The world of high growth tech start-ups typically revolves around speed and deft execution. Every day is an ongoing race to do things bigger and better; a day can blur into a week which blurs into a month, the only constant factor being change: product shipping, new team members joining (11 for us the other week!) and new offices opening. A break might consist of a meeting conducted over a brisk walk around the block, twice if you need to discuss something in detail. Juxtaposed against this permanent state of acceleration, Stream, with its no fixed schedule and anarchic approach, seemed both mysterious and alluring.

I am not the typical start-up employee. I have adopted the start-up mentality as a way of life but, in the beginning, its fluctuating dynamics were foreign to me. I joined Percolate from Sotheby’s, the esteemed auction house and the oldest company traded on the NYSE. Naturally, it is a place deeply entrenched in tradition, and it is a very well-oiled machine. I worked in the Watches and Clocks department, where I spent my days with objects that were often several hundred years old, ranging from complex Patek Philippe watches similar to this one just sold last week, to vintage Rolexes, to utterly charming 19th century automatons, like this Ethiopian Caterpillar.

When I arrived at Percolate, it was clear from the beginning that not only was rapid change a way of life for us internally, the media landscape was also changing dramatically. As I spent day after day sitting with clients and agency partners listening to their challenges in this evolving new world, everybody acutely felt the challenges that social and mobile had introduced to their marketing efforts in some way, shape or form. All of us in the industry are well aware that these factors have extraordinary, and difficult, implications for marketing, largely because the operational infrastructure that exists today does not support either this type of scale or pace of production and distribution.

At Sotheby’s, when I was confronted with a problem, I had all the best restorers, herpetologists and ornithologists on speed dial to fix any problems that arose, no matter how rare or obscure. If I needed to identify a single feather on a 200 year old object, I knew who to call. Unfortunately, no such Rolodex existed in this brave new world. To be clear, there were many experts in marketing, in digital, in branding, and so on, but there was no roster of tried and true experts, in the sense that we were all contending with a very new landscape. We were watching the merging of two previously separate disciplines: marketing and technology, and the challenges we encountered simply hadn’t existed before.

My most memorable and fruitful conversations with clients and agency partners in this context always revolved around the resulting new challenges; they often lingered on difficult questions with no clear answers, and they were always stimulating and thought provoking. I often wished that I could spend the entirety of these meetings only discussing these issues. They seemed to warrant much more time than simply the first 15 minutes of a meeting. To think of these challenges as merely context seemed to be a massive understatement to me.

I wasn’t sure what to expect of Stream, but I knew in advance that there was something irresistible about its dialectical format, especially given it would take place in the birthplace of dialectics: Greece. My inner nerd was completely thrilled just hearing about this. Of course, I was also very curious having seen the attendee list, which drew from across a wide span of industries and roles. However, industry conferences often give me reason to hesitate, as I find those worthwhile attending are few and far between. Too often, keynote addresses can drag on as speakers on the conference circuit rehash presentations given multiple times at other conferences, and conversations are harried with everybody hurrying to exchange as many business cards as possible.

Set aside the fact that there are no keynote presentations at Stream, and conventional powerpoints are in fact banned – what I quickly came to realize about Stream, additionally, was that it broke down a series of barriers, making it a very different conference experience, namely because:

  1. Conversations are off the record
  2. For better or worse, you are confined to a geographically limited space for an extended period of time
  3. Hierarchy is deconstructed with anybody hosting a discussion on any topic

Moreover, the environment is designed for chemistry. The existence of only one coffee bar means that chance encounters are highly likely in the afternoon when jet lag kicks in. Communal dining means that somebody (anybody) could sit down next to you during lunch or dinner. These often yielded the best and most unexpected of conversations.

The attendees of Stream, of course, are vital to this chemistry. I read an interesting blurb tucked into the back pages of the FT last week which referenced the research of Yale sociologist Professor Nicholas Christakis, who studies how people interact when they come together in groups. He uses an analogy to compare graphite to diamonds, thinking of humans as metaphorical carbon atoms, who can come together to form either substance, depending on how they are arranged.

This insight cast light onto what I found to be the most remarkable aspect of Stream – that somehow, the Stream team had assembled a group of people, who when they came together, formed not merely a common substance like graphite, but something much rarer and brilliant, akin to a diamond. My initial inclinations around that attendee list were right on target; some of us may never have crossed paths outside of Stream, and most of us would never have wound up in the same place all at once, otherwise.

There were a number of conversations about talent at Stream, but what wasn’t addressed was that while attracting and retaining talent when it comes to individuals is certainly a tough challenge, constructing groups and building teams to collaborate and work effectively together is perhaps even more difficult, and I would argue, even more important. As marketing merges with technology, it becomes increasingly important to collaborate across these disciplines that were once separate.

The constant change which defines our industry today also requires constant creativity to deal with its ever evolving set of challenges. For the mind to contend with the unknown, it can benefit from the removal of parameters. What if there were no established way of doing things? What if you could discuss anything? What if you could create anything? I think of our annual hackdays at Percolate where the business and product teams come together to dream up new ideas and products, temporarily removed from any firm roadmap or client requests, and the unexpected, brilliant ideas that always emerge from it. Stream, similarly, was a unique environment, devoid for rules, for precisely this type of open ended discussion so important to navigating the difficult challenges we face today as an industry. I attribute its success to the chemistry and environment so thoughtfully constructed by the Stream team, not only in terms of format, but in terms of the group dynamics that would take shape over the weekend – it was no small feat.

Thank you, Martin and Yossi, for inviting me. I hope you’ll invite me again!

Professors' Rights to Free Speech at Risk Nationwide

Co-authored by Will Creeley, Vice President of Legal and Public Advocacy for the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE)

The University of Illinois’ controversial decision to rescind its offer of employment to Professor Steven Salaita in reaction to his Twitter commentary about Israel continues to generate headlines. Last Monday, Salaita filed suit against the university, alleging that it violated a state open records law by failing to provide his attorneys with documents relating to the decision not to hire him. Further litigation is all but guaranteed, prolonging attention to an embarrassing misstep for the university that has generated condemnation from both left and right in recent months.

For free speech advocates, the university’s decision to renege on its agreement to hire Salaita reached its nadir with Chancellor Phyllis Wise’s half-baked invocation of “civility” as some kind of justification for ditching the professor. In a letter sent campus-wide, Wise stated that the university could “not tolerate … personal and disrespectful words or actions that demean and abuse either viewpoints themselves or those who express them.”

This might sound pleasant enough–if you’re only half-listening, or somehow don’t hold any ideas that might be disagreeable to anyone, anywhere. But as our colleague Robert Shibley pointed out, public universities are supposed to be where our best and brightest “disrespectfully” “abuse” theories and ideas. That’s how scholarship works! (And if you’ve ever hung out with grad students or read the letters page of The New York Review of Books, you know that scholars can get pretty heated with one another.)

Sadly, the mess at the University of Illinois this fall isn’t an isolated incident. Instead, as Elizabeth Nolan Brown astutely observed for Reason, “Salaita’s story speaks to a larger, worrying devaluation of free speech in 21st century academia.” That’s all too true.

Working for the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending civil liberties on campus, we’ve seen faculty nationwide punished for speaking their minds as of late. The list of examples is long:

  • In September 2013, University of Kansas Professor David Guth was placed on administrative leave following a tweet he posted to his personal Twitter account condemning the National Rifle Association. Though the tweet comprised only constitutionally protected speech, the controversy surrounding it inspired the Kansas Board of Regents to enact a new policy on “improper use of social media” that allows the state’s public institutions of higher education to punish faculty for a range of protected expression online.
  • Back in January, Bergen Community College Professor Francis Schmidt posted a picture on Google+ of his young daughter wearing a T-shirt that said, “I will take what is mine with fire & blood”–a quote from the popular HBO show Game of Thrones. An automatic email was sent to Schmidt’s Google+ contacts, which was forwarded to administrators who deemed it a “threatening email.” BCC placed Schmidt on unpaid leave until a psychiatrist attested to his mental fitness and told him he could be terminated if he made “disparaging” comments about the college. BCC finally cleared Schmidt’s record only under pressure from the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan.
  • Twice a year for over 20 years, Professor Patti Adler included a presentation on prostitution in her “Deviance in U.S. Society” course, which included a skit in which teaching assistants volunteered to portray prostitutes and answer questions as their characters. The course was a perennial favorite at the University of Colorado at Boulder, but in December 2013, administrators told Adler that a former teaching assistant had objected to the presentation. Because some students might be “uncomfortable” (though no students said they were), Adler was given a choice between resigning or canceling the course. Under public pressure, CU-Boulder eventually allowed Adler to return and continue teaching, but by then, participation in the presentation had already been significantly chilled, forcing Adler to discontinue it.
  • In March 2012, Appalachian State University Professor Jammie Price was placed on administrative leave for criticizing the university’s handling of sexual assault cases and screening a documentary that took a critical look at the adult film industry in her sociology course. Students alleged that Price had created a hostile environment, and App State found her guilty without affording her due process and ordered her to complete training on how to teach “sensitive topics.”
  • Professor Suzanne Sisley worked for years to obtain the necessary governmental approval for her study on the therapeutic effects of marijuana, to be conducted at the University of Arizona, where she had worked since 2007. In June 2014, however, the university abruptly terminated her employment amidst accusations that she supported a recall petition against a senator who had blocked state funding for her study. Arizona lawmakers wrote to UA to express concern that Sisley’s termination appeared to be politically motivated and to note the severe chilling effect this could have on future research.
  • This summer, University of North Carolina at Wilmington Professor Mike Adams finally reached the end of his seven-year federal lawsuit alleging that UNC Wilmington denied him a promotion because of conservative political viewpoints he had expressed in non-university publications. The university was ultimately ordered to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in attorneys’ fees and back pay. Adams created positive First Amendment precedent in the Fourth Circuit for everyone, regardless of views, but this legal battle demonstrates the extreme lengths to which professors sometimes must go simply to defend their right to free speech.

Salaita’s case is worrying on its own–and even more so when considered as part of this pattern. These examples illustrate that the threat to faculty rights is widespread, and that professors from across the political spectrum are being punished for expressing themselves on a range of topics.

Colleges and universities must realize that professors can help students explore new ideas only when they can be sure that they won’t be disciplined for doing so. As the Supreme Court wrote in it’s 1957’s decision of Sweezy v. New Hampshire: “Scholarship cannot flourish in an atmosphere of suspicion and distrust. Teachers and students must always remain free to inquire, to study and to evaluate, to gain new maturity and understanding; otherwise our civilization will stagnate and die.”

In the Wake of Ferguson, What I'm Thankful For…

I don’t really know what to say about Ferguson.

So, I’m just going to make a list of what I’m thankful for.

I am thankful to be able to have grown up with enough hard knocks to know how scary and dysfunctional this world can be when ignorance takes the place of reason and dysfunction takes the place of compassion. This has given me an understanding of the downtrodden.

I am thankful to have grown up with enough privilege to feel like an important and contributing member of this society, a person of worth, who has something to say and something to do in this world. This has given me the passion to move past the aforementioned hard knocks.

I am thankful to now raise a child in Mississippi, a place that is in constant transition, a place that has seen the darkest and most violent times of our nation’s history while simultaneously producing some of the most inspiring art and music and literature. I am thankful to raise my child here because I have so much to teach her about where we’ve been, where we are and where we are going.

I am thankful to work with young people, to see the anger and hope and passion they put into their status updates, texts and tweets in response to last night’s decision. They are our hope, and their conviction will save us.

I am thankful for the Browns, for their courage to respond to this decision with dignity and grace, calling for people to focus their energy on fighting injustice instead of fighting each other. This family has been through the absolute worst — the loss of a child. The last thing they want now is for others to lose the same thing.

I am thankful for those who protect us, for those who promote peace and tolerance. They make incredible sacrifices to shield us from harm, in our cities, on our streets, even in the protest line.

I am thankful for the protestors, who wholeheartedly follow these words of my hero, Henry David Thoreau: “If the machine of government is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law.” Those who participate in true civil disobedience are those who shame wrongdoers deliberately and thoughtfully. These peaceful protestors are an inspiration, and I am thankful that their conviction will continue to push the conversation about race relations in this country forward.

I am thankful for the anger I feel, the anger I have about this young man’s avoidable death, about the lack of justice for his family. I am thankful to be so angry because it gives me hope. If we can feel such strong emotions about a complete stranger’s death, doesn’t that mean we have the capability to make meaningful change? I once heard that the opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference. I am thankful that, of all of the things we are in the wake of last night’s decision, very few of us are indifferent. And that means there is hope.

Eckerd College President: You Can Stop Rape By Not Drinking Or Having Casual Sex

On Sunday, Eckerd College President Donald Eastman sent an “open letter” to all students and faculty urging students to cut back on alcohol and casual sex in order to prevent sexual assault. He says that by doing so, students will address the “nexus of problems” surrounding sexual assault.

“You know that these incidents are almost always preceded by consumption, often heavy consumption, of alcohol, often by everyone involved in them,” the Florida college president wrote. The full letter was published by the Current, Eckerd’s student paper.

Eastman condemned casual sex, writing that “No one’s culture or character or understanding is improved by casual sex.” He added that “those who are virtuous are happier as well as healthier,” and referred to how “Western Culture” values virtue.

“I was trying to say that we would have a healthier and less dangerous campus if people drank less and took their sexual relations more seriously,” Eastman clarified in an interview with the Tampa Bay Times.

Joshua R. Keeler, an alumnus of the school, began a Change.org petition asking Eastman to readdress the issue of sexual assault.

“I believe that laying the blame solely at the feet of the two issues you mentioned is an injustice to those affected by sexual assault, and will not solve the problem,” Keeler wrote.

Eastman came under fire for remarks about sexual assault the same week that Robert Jennings at Lincoln University resigned his presidency after telling female students to not put themselves in dangerous situations. Former George Washington University president Stephen Trachtenberg was also criticized this summer for saying that women need to be sober enough to “punch the guys in the nose if they misbehave.”

Eckerd did not return a request for comment.

'Felon With No High School Degree' Finds Fairytale Thanksgiving On Craigslist

If you’re looking for someone special to spend Thanksgiving with, you might want to try posting an ad on Craigslist.

That’s what Nashville resident Nick Schmidt did, and the self-described “28 year old felon with no high school degree, and a dirty old van one year younger than me painted like Eddie Van Halen’s guitar” told HuffPost Live on Tuesday that the post had in fact scored him a date for Thursday’s meal. That’s right: one lucky lady will have the luxury of having Schmidt perhaps propose to her or start a fight in front of everyone, as he so kindly offered in his ad.

“I got a real response the next day offering me to come to this girl’s Thanksgiving get-together with her roommate and friends, and then go over to her parent’s house, eat food, shoot guns, have a good time,” he recounted. “So I took her up on it and we still have the plans set.”

“She offered to drive and everything,” he added.

We hear wedding bells ringing in the distance!

Watch the clip above to hear more about Nick Schmidt’s Craigslist Thanksgiving.

Sign up here for Live Today, HuffPost Live’s new morning email that will let you know the newsmakers, celebrities and politicians joining us that day and give you the best clips from the day before!