Public Will Can Change Homelessness

November is Homelessness Awareness month. This time of year always reminds me of a powerful story, an unexpected seasonal lesson about homelessness, that I learned when I worked at the Corporation for Supportive Housing, which invests in housing for homeless people.

We interviewed a young man we will call “John” who described his Thanksgiving — intense loneliness sitting on a Manhattan rooftop trying to avoid the snow falling outside, listening to the voices in the apartments celebrating. It wasn’t his hunger or longing for a warm bed that he focused on, but his loneliness.

While we know that homeless people need shelter and food, we don’t often think about the high toll of loneliness. Avoiding contact is part of a complex set of strategies people use to survive. But long-term, isolation breeds hopelessness, leading to a downward spiral that makes it hard to take action, to find housing, work, and reconnect.

Perhaps because the holiday season is rich with hope for most of us, it’s hard to want to think too much about homelessness because it makes us feel helpless and hopeless.

Yet people are homeless in large numbers because we as citizens tolerate it. If we in the U.S. – you and I — decided that homelessness was unacceptable, we would no longer have widespread homelessness.

Although we had rates of poverty in the early to mid-1960’s for example from 14 to 22 percent, compared to 13 to 15 percent in the 1980s, in the earlier period we did not see nearly the same numbers of people living in our streets that we do today. What changed?

1. Housing prices increased faster than inflation, and we tore down a lot of cheap housing as we undertook ‘urban renewal.’ Federal housing expenditures overall tilt toward higher income homeowners through the mortgage interest deduction, with significant gaps between the need for subsidies that can make rental housing affordable to people with low incomes, and the level of subsidies available.

2. While the move toward deinstitutionalizing people with mental illness in the 1970’s was a positive one, unfortunately states did not invest sufficient resources in developing alternative community based resources, and as the availability of mental health services decreased in relation to the need, increasing numbers became homeless.

3. Veterans who were discharged at the end of the Vietnam War hit a wall after coming home to inadequate programs that could help with post-war health, mental health and addiction issues, including connections to housing and civilian jobs.

4. AIDS hit the U.S. like a bombshell, with formerly middle class men in the initial wave becoming very ill very quickly, causing them to lose their jobs and become homeless.

5. The crack cocaine epidemic exploded. As a result of addiction people lost jobs or entered a revolving door of incarceration and homelessness.

Now, decades later, just under 600,000 men, women, youth, children are homeless daily – well over a million each year. And with new veterans coming home from the war, and the housing market heating up, the levels of homelessness remain high.

2014-11-20-homelessmapv3.jpg

What is to be done? In the early 2000’s the federal government, prodded by the National Alliance to End Homelessness among other advocates called for communities to develop plans not just to manage, but to end homelessness. Many local governments heeded the call. Data from many studies showed that supportive housing (low cost permanent housing with built in support services) cost little more than leaving people bouncing through shelters, jails, and emergency rooms. As a result, our country set an audacious goal to create more than 100,000 apartments for chronically homeless people, which we achieved – and the number of individuals experiencing chronic homelessness has declined by 25% since 2007. More recently we have set and are starting to achieve goals to decrease veterans’ homelessness. Places where we might not expect significant progress – like Utah – are getting the job done by focusing on solutions.

One approach to addressing this problem is ‘rapid re-housing’ — getting people rehoused as fast as possible after they become homeless. And holding other systems accountable so that they don’t discharge people into homelessness — notably healthcare and incarceration.

Work also plays a huge role. John, who sat lonely on a rooftop, eventually got into supportive housing, then got a job managing an apartment building. By chance we had a photo of John in the streets when he was homeless – big beard, unkempt clothes. But when we did our interview, he was housed and working, in a suit and tie, happy, healthy, and motivated.

Organizations like Community Housing Partnership, Chrysalis and Weingart Center for the Homeless – run social enterprise businesses, which provide first-step employment to people exiting homelessness. The employees can get the experience and training they need to move on, and regain hope so that they can reconnect to society.

Awareness is the first step, but we also need action. It is time to stop tolerating widespread homelessness.

An Open Letter to the Man Who Abused Me

2014-11-19-1620546_1513585878872416_7069457008370884713_n.jpg

Dear Bob,

It was Dwight Howard that motivated me to write you. I think that all men who are given the responsibility of caring for children should read this.

About a year ago you sent me a birthday card c/o my mother. I could never understand why you did that. I’ve had no contact with you for over 30 years yet you suddenly remember a birthday? I’d no idea you were even still alive. Surprising you would send a card and not even know my name. How could you imagine that I would have kept the name of my childhood, a name that included your name. I would never have carried around a daily reminder of your existence.

At one point in my life I would have cared; I would have wanted a card.

When I was very young I very much wanted your love, I wanted you to be my father, or at least pretend that you cared. Love was not what I received.

There was a time when I hated you for what you had done to me, to my family. I fantasized about the gruesome ways the universe would pay you back.

Eventually I realized that Karma is the dream of the powerless. I wanted Karma to exist to right the wrongs for me.

The only way to escape my past was to change my name and become a new person, I did that very successfully. Of course mental and emotional work were a big part of that process.

I ended up largely cutting ties to two of my brothers. I was toxic to them and they were toxic to me. When I wrote about this previously I learned how much one of them resents me, and not without reason. He has chosen to be a part of a religion that I cannot muster respect for, he has also kept your name.

You see, you damaged us all and we all responded in different ways.

I call my mother on Mother and Father’s day because she had to be both, and once you were gone she did an extraordinary job of it.

But the take-away from all of this, what I want Dwight and all the other abusive men to hear is this.

At some point we stop caring.

The hate leaves, the desire for revenge leaves. All of the negatives are let go as we build own own lives.

The reason I did not investigate your motivation for sending the card is just that…I don’t care.

I don’t care if you are sick, homeless, starving to death, or being beaten by thugs in a prison cell.

To all the men like you….at some point the child will grow up and no longer care, you will have no power to hurt any longer, and they will have no capacity to love you.

So men, think about this. Imagine being old and trotting around an oxygen tank. You no longer inspire the fear you could pretend was respect, and when you die no one comes to your funeral because no one loves you.

Sincerely Yours,

Karl Wilder
The son you never had

Howard Schultz Is Right About Our Veterans

Duty. Honor. Country. To any American who has served in the military, these aren’t just words. They are at our core.

In their excellent new book, For Love of Country, Starbucks founder Howard Schultz and Washington Post journalist Rajiv Chandrasekaran make the point that our country has the duty to honor our veterans. They don’t mean with charity but with respect, by taking the time to understand what they can teach us about their experiences.

They note that less than one percent of the U.S. population have served our military abroad since September 11, 2001, and that their experiences are disconnected from what the other 99 percent of Americans do in their daily lives. They correctly see this as a tragic loss for America. They write that it’s not enough to applaud our fellow countrymen and women in stadiums and arenas. We should learn from them, hire them and care for them.

Schultz and Chandrasekaran couldn’t be more on point, especially as the holidays approach.

Too many veterans are un- or underemployed. Too many veterans are homeless. Schultz is acting by pledging Starbucks will hire 10,000 veterans and active duty spouses over five years. In Jersey City, we will make sure no veteran is homeless by the end of 2015. We’ve signed on to Michelle Obama’s Mayor’s Challenge to End Veteran Homelessness.

More specifically, we are working to ensure that no veteran is forced to sleep on the street, and has access to adequate, permanent housing. If a veteran becomes homeless or is at risk of homelessness, we will have the resources to return them to housing stability. When those things are accomplished, the goal of ending veteran homelessness in Jersey City is reached.

Our efforts here in Jersey City are part of a larger national movement to end veteran homelessness. Soon, Jersey City, in partnership with community-based organizations and our corporate residents, will be building supportive housing for our homeless veterans. We will apply for HUD funding to pay the operating expenses of the building and partner with the VA for case management and healthcare services.

We are gathering data on housing, on the needs of homeless veterans generally, and on the population of homeless vets in Jersey City. Thus far, we’ve learned a good deal about the homeless veterans in Jersey City. This data will give us a general range for the homeless veterans in and around Jersey City, but won’t be a comprehensive measurement of all families and individuals who experience homelessness throughout the year. We have a great deal still to learn about this population, and are developing other methods, including a more robust outreach program.

Giving these veterans homes will just be the start of what I believe our country owes them for their service. We will be in touch with Starbucks and others about employment opportunities and also will provide forums so we can learn from their experiences.

For Love and Country is important reading and we need to take to heart the book’s subtitle: “What Our Veterans Can Teach Us about Citizenship, Heroism and Sacrifice.” Let’s get started.

Steven Fulop is Mayor of Jersey City, New Jersey and a U.S. Marine Corps veteran who enlisted after 9/11 and served in Iran.

Obama Has Issued Fewer Executive Orders Than Any President In Past 100 Years

In response to President Barack Obama’s executive order on immigration Thursday, Republican lawmakers have threatened to sue the president or block his judicial nominees on grounds that the president overstepped his constitutional powers.

Obama’s unilateral action, which will grant deportation relief to roughly five million undocumented immigrants, came almost a year and a half after the Senate approved a comprehensive immigration reform measure. House Republicans have refused to take up that bill but also failed to move an immigration plan of their own, saying they will pursue a more piecemeal approach to the issue.

While the constitutionality of the president’s order has been cleared by both liberal and conservative legal experts, GOP lawmakers, including House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R), are still calling the action illegal.

Following Obama’s announcement, Boehner accused him of acting like a “king or emperor,” adding that Republicans “will not stand idle as the president undermines the rule of law in our country and places lives at risk.”

During a Fox News interview Sunday, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) argued that only Congress is authorized to legislate federal immigration policies and said Obama was “defying the law, defying the constitution” and “behaving in an unprecedented way.” Congress’ exclusive immigration powers include ending all deportations and permanently altering a specific group’s immigration status. Obama’s order does neither.

While Obama’s new policy may be more expansive than previous presidential orders on immigration, the order itself is certainly not unprecedented.

Since 1956, two presidents — both Republican — have employed executive orders to implement immigration reform. In 1981, Ronald Reagan moved to defer the deportation of roughly 100,000 undocumented immigrants. Five years later, George H.W. Bush also used his executive powers to relieve 1.5 million undocumented immigrants of deportation.

In fact, Obama has issued fewer executive orders than every president since 1901. While Democratic presidents have relied on executive orders more frequently than Republicans over the last 100 years, Obama’s average executive orders per year in office fall nearly 3.3 points below George W. Bush, 8.4 below George H.W. Bush and roughly 14.5 points below Ronald Reagan.

A new survey conducted by Hart Research Associates has found that a majority of Americans are supportive of Obama’s executive action on immigration. According to Friday’s poll, conducted on behalf of liberal group Americans United for Change, 67 percent of likely 2016 voters said they supported the president’s plan while 28 percent opposed it.

How Gratitude Can Boost Your Love Life

Relationships are never picture-perfect. They can be a messy bag of frustration, passion, joy, and disappointment. There are probably one or two things that drive you crazy about your partner. He doesn’t take out the trash, or she checks her phone too much at the dinner table, or he doesn’t seem to listen when you vent about your bad day. But of all the things you think need improvement (which, don’t get me wrong, could be perfectly valid), how about focusing on what you’re getting?

Just as it’s a choice to criticize or blame our partners for what we think we’re not getting in a relationship, it’s also a choice to be grateful for what you have and for where you are in this moment. Gratitude can not only improve your attitude; it can help improve your love life, as well. Let’s look at how.

How you act is what you attract. Kindness attracts kindness. Thoughtfulness attracts thoughtfulness. Love attracts love. One thoughtful act can be monumental in someone’s day. And guess what? It can make your relationship stronger.

Bottom line: kindness trumps criticism, every time.

My fiancé taught me much about gratitude and the incredible ripple effect it can have on creating and maintaining a great relationship. He’s one of the most loving, giving men I’ve ever met. He leaves notes on my pillow as thanks for something I’ve done for him (like taking him to Palm Springs for his birthday), as acknowledgement after I’ve accomplished something monumental (like writing a book), or when I’ve had a tough week to give me a boost. Sometimes… just because.

So, whether it’s a note, a gesture, or by simply saying, “I appreciate you,” your relationship will get a feel-good boost. Keep it up, and you’ll go from complaining to compassion, arguing to appreciation, or blaming to a better understanding of your partner or the situation. By saying, “Thank you” to your partner for something they’ve done, like helping with the dishes, running an errand for you, or picking up your favorite coffee, it’ll encourage them to do more, as well!

So take this opportunity to be grateful for the great things you have and for where you are right now, because what you focus on, you get more of. By expressing gratitude, you’ll improve your connection, ease the little annoyances, deal with problems better, have better discussions, and find better solutions. And by acknowledging the best in someone else, you bring out the best in yourself, too.

This goes for any relationship in your life. So how about saying a big, “Thank you” to someone for what they’ve done for you, what they’ve inspired in you, or maybe even just for being a great friend, roommate, or coworker. Or say thanks to that driver who let you in (give him or her a wave, please) or the waiter who gave you a big smile when you were having a rough day, or the Starbucks cashier who treated you kindly when you ordered your triple, venti, soy, no foam, no whip, pumpkin latte.

A little “thank you” goes a long way.

And BTW, “Thank you” for reading this.

Darren Wilson Could Face Consequences Aside From Grand Jury Decision

The grand jury in the case of Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson may not have the final word in the shooting death of Michael Brown.

Even if the grand jury decides not to indict Wilson, the 28-year-old policeman at the center of the outcry over Brown’s killing, his fate could still hang on a Justice Department investigation, his police officer licensing and a potential civil lawsuit.

The Justice Department investigation carries with it the most serious consequences: the federal agency could bring charges against Wilson for violating Brown’s civil rights. But such charges are rare. More than two years into the investigation of the death of another unarmed black teen, Trayvon Martin, the department has yet to come to a decision on whether to bring charges against George Zimmerman, the man who killed him.

Law enforcement officials told the Washington Post last month that charges against Wilson were unlikely.

Missouri’s Department of Public Safety, meanwhile, also could take action to strip Wilson’s license. Forty-four states can remove a police officer’s license, and Missouri is one of the most aggressive in doing so.

Unlike many others, the state does not require a police officer to be convicted of a crime before his or her license can be removed. According to the language of state statute, it must prove only that a crime was committed, “whether or not a criminal charge has been filed.”

Still, said Roger Goldman, an expert on police licensing at St. Louis University, “my research suggests that these are difficult cases to win.” Without an indictment, the state could be loathe to proceed with further action against Wilson — a step that likely would be met with howls of protest from police unions.

”Statistically, the number for revocations for excessive force around the country are pretty small,” said Goldman. Wilson theoretically could face more licensing trouble from the state for misconduct like lying on a police form. Some critics claim he did that during the arrest of a man who was videotaping him.

“The easier cases on the revocation side would be gratuitous things like perjury, sexual misconduct,” said Goldman.

Wilson is reportedly in talks with the Ferguson Police Department to resign on his own account.

More likely than action from the federal or state governments is a civil lawsuit. When all else fails — as it often does in the case of police shootings — private citizens are still empowered to take legal action against police officers in the civil legal system. The most that plaintiffs can win are money damages, a step that many victims of police misconduct have said stops short of justice. Brown’s family could sue both Wilson and the City of Ferguson.

“What happens or doesn’t happen with the grand jury is irrelevant with the civil suit,” said Steve Ryals, a Missouri civil rights lawyer who frequently litigates police misconduct cases. “I would be flabbergasted if they didn’t file a suit.”

The suit against Ferguson would face the bar of proving that the city’s police department had a history of poor training and ignoring misconduct. The suit against Wilson likely would focus on whether he wrongfully caused Brown’s death. The suit would need to show a preponderance of the evidence that he did so. That essentially means a majority of the evidence, a much lower standard than guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the standard in criminal cases.

Ryals said it would be idle to speculate on the outcome of a suit right now, when witness statements and police forensics are still enshrouded in secrecy.

“We all think we know what happened and we have bits of information that may or may not be accurate or reliable,” said Ryals. “The only thing I can say is you’ve got an unarmed guy who was shot to death, and that’s sort of the starting point in my opinion.”

Tribble Coin Purse Sadly Won’t Cause Coins to Multiply

Tribbles are sort of cute little furry characters that can cause all sorts of trouble. The little beasties multiply faster than rabbits and gum up the works leading to all sorts of problems. If you were overrun by tribbles, perhaps you could turn to using their pelts for something like this coin purse.

tribble-1zoom in

Whatever the futuristic version of PETA is might have issue with the skinning of tribbles though. The upside is that this tribble coin purse is made from faux fur, so you can relax. The fur is 100% nylon, so no tribble was killed in its making.

tribble-2zoom in

For a coin purse, it’s rather large and fluffy at 4.5″(w) x 3.5″(h) and it screams geek like few other things. Pick up your own tribble coin purse for $12.99 at ThinkGeek.

Android Auto hands-on: Promising but patchy flexibility

Android AutoWe’ve heard plenty about Apple’s CarPlay, but what about Android Auto? Finally getting its moment in the spotlight now that Android 5.0 Lollipop is arriving, the dashboard-takeover isn’t actually available on any production car quite yet, but I was able to take an early look at the LA Auto Show inside a new 2015 Hyundai Sonata. The premise is simple: … Continue reading

Verizon’s Moto X Android Lollipop release Benchmarked

frozenslashgearcarsThis morning the 4G LTE Verizon version of the Motorola Moto X from 2014 has an update rolling out across the United States. This update is for the system software, bringing this unit’s OS up to Android 5.0 Lollipop. Users have seen this update appearing as early as noon here in the midwest – if you don’t have it yet, … Continue reading

This Cheap Little Circuit Could Double Data Speed on Your Next Phone

This Cheap Little Circuit Could Double Data Speed on Your Next Phone

Wireless technology is already amazing. It’s any data you could ever want through the air. But some exciting innovations are hiding on the horizon. This cheap little circuit that allows a wireless antenna to send and receive data at the same time is one of them. It stands to double the rate at which your phone transfers data.

Read more…