Obamacare Penalty Could Cost More Than You Expect

Considering going without health insurance next year? Be careful — it could cost more than you think.

As you’ve probably heard, Obamacare requires most U.S. residents to obtain some form of health coverage, either from a job, a private insurance company or a government program like Medicaid.

Failing to do so could mean taking a hit on your taxes. There’s been a lot of attention paid to the $95 tax penalty for people who are uninsured this year. But in reality, few people will pay that little, and high-income households could owe thousands of dollars when they file their 2014 taxes. Plus, the minimum penalty more than triples for the 2015 tax year.

Don’t expect to hear much about the mandate during the big enrollment push under way. Although the individual mandate is a critical part of Obamacare, it’s politically toxic. Plus, focusing on the positive benefits of the law has proven more effective at increasing enrollment — and decreasing the number of people who’d be penalized — than emphasizing the negative parts of it, said Anne Filipic, president of Enroll America, a nonprofit promoting Obamacare sign-ups.

“We are continuing to lead with the facts about what’s available to consumers, and especially the message about financial assistance,” Filipic said. “We want to be careful not to talk about it in a threatening way.” Information about the mandate and penalties will be secondary, and the group plans to emphasize it closer to the February deadline to use the the health insurance exchanges to sign up for coverage that will be in effect next year, she said.

An April Enroll America survey found that the mandate motivated some people who signed up during the first Obamacare enrollment period, which ended in April. Nineteen percent said they wouldn’t have enrolled without it, and another 21 percent said they weren’t sure if the would have.

Still, President Barack Obama’s administration believes promoting the subsidies available to low- and middle-income families and emphasizing the cut-off date is a better way to boost sign-ups. “Our primary focus is going to be on affordability and deadlines. That’s what we know really works and drives people,” a senior administration official told The Huffington Post.

But the individual mandate is a big and complex change in the law, and taxpayers need to understand how it affects them. That’s especially true now. Enrollment on the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance exchanges began Saturday and runs through Feb. 15. Except under special circumstances, like having a baby, consumers who want to use these online marketplaces will have to sign up now or wait until next year to get for private insurance. (However, there’s no deadline for Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program applications.)

Considering an estimated 87 percent of Americans already have health coverage and the slew of exemptions from the individual mandate, not many people actually will owe penalties if they aren’t covered. For those who do owe, the penalty will likely cost less than health insurance — but they’ll be exposed to potentially unlimited expenses in the event of a serious injury or illness.

The individual mandate penalty is calculated as the greater of either a set dollar amount or a percentage of income, and it varies from $95 to about $11,000.

To protect lower-income families from big expenses, and to more strongly push higher-income people to get covered rather than pay the extra taxes, there are two methods for figuring out the penalty. You would pay either as a set dollar amount per person — $95 per adult and $47.50 per child, up to $285 this year — or a percentage of household income, whichever is higher.

For the 2014 tax year, higher-income people who are uninsured probably would wind up paying 1 percent of their taxable income minus $10,000 to $22,400, depending on family size and other factors. That could be as much as $11,000, which is the maximum possible penalty, and is based on the national average price for a “bronze” insurance plan available on the Obamacare exchanges.

The minimum penalties get a lot higher next year. They start out at $325 per adult and $162.50 per child, up to a maximum of $975 per household, or 2 percent of household income (after subtracting that $10,000 or more), whichever is more. The maximum penalty for 2015 will be about the same as the maximum penalty for 2014.

A family of four with an income of three times the federal poverty level — about $70,650 — would owe around $500 this year, and more than double that in 2015, according to a calculator created by the Tax Policy Center.

People who owe these penalties will see them deducted from their income tax refunds or added to their tax bills. Unlike other taxes owed, though, not paying isn’t a crime, and the IRS can’t garnish the wages or put liens on the property of people who don’t pay it.

Plus, there are a whole lot of exemptions from the individual mandate.

They include if you earn too little to file federal income taxes or if the cheapest plan you can find costs more than 8 percent of your income. People with religious objections to insurance also don’t have to get covered. Undocumented immigrants aren’t allowed to use the Obamacare exchanges, so they also don’t have to comply with the individual mandate. People who live in states that didn’t adopt Obamacare’s expansion of Medicaid are exempt if they would have qualified for the program. What’s more, there’s a “hardship” exemption the federal government has defined very broadly.

Obamacare includes the individual mandate as a way to nudge people into health coverage and discourage “free riders” who use health services when they could afford insurance. Being insured for at least nine months a year fulfills the mandate.

Obamacare’s authors call it the “individual shared responsibility provision.” As the theory goes, a health insurance market that’s open to everyone, including those with pre-existing conditions, must include as many people as possible, especially those who don’t have high medical bills and will pay into the pool without drawing down much. As healthy people age or become unlucky enough to get sick, this is supposed guarantee there’s a health insurance system in place to take care of them.

In addition, more people covered means fewer people getting treated at emergency rooms and not paying the bills, which costs taxpayers billions in the form of special Medicare and Medicaid funding that goes to hospitals treating large numbers of people who can’t afford the care they received. So people either get covered, or pay the penalty to offset the costs they incur when they get sick.

“Those who can afford health care but choose to go without are required to make a payment to help cover their medical costs and keep coverage affordable for others,” the Treasury spokesperson wrote.

Sam Stein contributed reporting.

Republicans Are All Over The Place On Senate Filibuster Reform

WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans were outraged when Democrats changed filibuster rules last year to make it easier to advance President Barack Obama’s nominees. They complained all year about being cut out of the process and took every opportunity to delay action on the nominees in protest.

But now that Republicans will be the majority in January, they’re all over the place on whether to keep the rules change for themselves. It currently takes 51 votes, instead of 60 votes, to clear a procedural hurdle, or a “filibuster,” on most judicial and executive nominees. Democrats reluctantly changed the rules last fall in response to GOP obstruction of Obama’s nominees, and it proved effective in clearing the logjam. But it also has fueled partisan tensions.

Some Republicans have strong feelings on the need to revert to the 60-vote threshold, in the name of fostering bipartisanship and restoring collegiality.

“I’ve always been an advocate to go back to the way it was before,” said Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.).

“I’m going to be strongly backing [Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s] effort to return the Senate to regular order,” said Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), who complained about Democratic leaders preventing debate on legislation as well as nominees. “The deep sleep — I’m sorry to offend you if you’re a Democrat — the deep sleep of [Senate Majority Leader] Harry Reid should end here.”

“I like the old way of doing business,” added Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). “I think it requires collaboration. Any time you require collaboration, you get a better product.”

Others said Democrats should have to experience being in the minority under the rules change that they made.

“Personally, I think we ought to stay right where we are,” said Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah).

“My view at the time they did it was, if this rule changes, it’s likely never to revert back to where it was,” said Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.). “We’ll have to see.”

“I was opposed, obviously, to the change,” said Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas). “I’m going to listen to the arguments on both sides.”

For the most part, Republicans said they haven’t made up their minds. HuffPost talked to more than a dozen GOP senators. Even party leaders said they wanted to wait until January before forming an opinion.

“We’re all going to discuss that and a lot of other issues going into next year,” said McConnell.

“Tough call. We’re going to have that discussion,” said Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), chairman of the Senate Republican Conference. “I’ve kind of been of the view that we ought to go back to the old rules and take the high road. But my thinking is still evolving on that because they’re making a pretty good argument that you can’t have two standards.”

Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.) said he sees the merits of keeping filibuster reform, and the downsides.

“There’s a lot of things we can do procedurally, even if we do go back to 60 votes. And it does add an element of bipartisanship to these judicial appointments,” Hoeven said. “On the flip side, I believe judges should be strict constructionists.”

Hoeven echoed the sentiments of Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who said he’s mixed. Rubio pushed back on the idea that Republicans could look like hypocrites for taking advantage of filibuster reform after bashing it all year.

“I haven’t thought about it that way,” Rubio said. “I’m just thinking about what’s the thing that’s going to make the Senate work best.”

Some senators didn’t want to talk about the issue at all. Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) stared blankly at HuffPost when asked if he wanted to keep filibuster reform, before slipping into an elevator and disappearing. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said she had thoughts on the matter, but didn’t want to share them.

“Who do you work for?” Collins asked, as this HuffPost reporter identified herself.

“That’s what I thought,” she replied, turning and walking away.

Veterans May Gain Easier Access To Medical Marijuana

A bill introduced in Congress would allow Department of Veterans Affairs doctors to recommend medical marijuana for their patients.

The Veterans Equal Access Act. Introduced Thursday by Reps. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) and Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.) with 10 bipartisan cosponsors, would lift a ban on VA doctors giving opinions or recommendations about medical marijuana to veterans who live in states where medical marijuana is permitted.

“Post traumatic stress and traumatic brain injury are just as damaging and harmful as any injuries that are visible from the outside,” Blumenauer said. “Sometimes even more so because of the devastating effect they can have on a veteran’s family. We should be allowing these wounded warriors access to the medicine that will help them survive and thrive, including medical marijuana, not treating them like criminals and forcing them into the shadows. It’s shameful.”

Nearly 30 percent of veterans who served in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars suffer from PTSD and depression, according to a 2012 report from the Department of Veterans Affairs. Some scientists have suggested that marijuana may help PTSD symptoms, which can include anxiety, flashbacks and depression. In a recent study, patients who smoked cannabis saw an average 75 percent reduction in PTSD symptoms.

“A clinical trial needs to be done to see what proportion and what kind of PTSD patients benefit, with either cannabis or the main active ingredients of cannabis,” said Dr. George Greer, who was involved in the study.

This year, federal health officials signed off on a study that would have examined the effects of five potencies of smoked or vaporized cannabis on 50 veterans suffering from PTSD. The study’s future still remains unclear because the federal government’s sole provider of medical-grade cannabis didn’t have the proper strains for the research to begin. Then the study’s lead scientist was fired from the University of Arizona, where the research would have taken place.

Currently, 23 states allow the medical use of marijuana. Ten of those states, as well as Guam which legalized medical marijuana this month, allow doctors to recommend medical marijuana for PTSD-related symptoms. The plant remains illegal under federal law for all uses.

Innovative Sensor Nails: Wearable Tech and Electronic Nail Art

Electronic Nail ArtHigh-tech nail art is rather new to the scene of the wearable tech invasion into fashion and accesories. Sensor nails rejuvenate the life of fingernails via touch augmentation. Read on for more information about this fascinating innovation.

Project loon balloons have traveled 3 million kilometers

loon1One of the most interesting projects that Google is working on is Project Loon. This project aims to put massive helium filled balloons into the stratosphere laden with gear that can send internet signals to the ground giving people speedy internet access in areas that currently have no access. Google has announced quite a milestone for its Project Loon. Since … Continue reading

Destiny now has a Trial, Demo appetizer

destinyOnline shooter Destiny might be one of the hottest games this year, but not everyone is prepared just yet to take the plunge. A plunge that will cost them $60, provided they already have the compatible consoles to begin with. For these types of gamers, Bungie is providing a cheap, in other words, free, way for them to nibble at … Continue reading

Twitter rolls out tweets via direct messages

direct-messagesMost twitter users have probably run across something on twitter before that they wanted to share with one person without posting it to your main feed. There hasn’t been a good way to do that sort of messaging someone a link in the past. That has now changed with twitter unveiling a simple new way to share tweets privately. Twitter … Continue reading

Samsung Unveils New Monitors With AMD’s FreeSync Technology

monitor3For gamers who are looking to get the best out of their gaming rigs, they’ve probably scouted around for monitors with the fastest response times, and in the case of NVIDIA GPU owners, probably looked for monitors that supports NVIDIA’s G-Sync technology. So where does this leave AMD gamers?

While to some gamers this might not be a big deal, there are some who strongly believe that this matters, and if you’re an AMD gamer you’re in luck because Samsung has recently announced two new monitors that will support AMD’s FreeSync which is the company’s answer to NVIDIA’s G-Sync technology.

For those unfamiliar, this basically syncs the GPU’s output to the monitor’s refresh rate, which ultimately removes visual stutters and screen tearing. The new monitors are the UD590 and the UE850 and they are only expected to be launched globally come March 2015, so if you’re an AMD gamer, you’ll just need to remain patient for a few more months before you can get it. Both models will be available in a variety of sizes.

The UD590 will come in 23.6-inch and 28-inch options, while the UE850 will come in 23.6-inch, 27-inch, and 31.5-inch options. Unfortunately pricing for these monitors were not mentioned, so we guess we’ll have to wait and find out.

Samsung Unveils New Monitors With AMD’s FreeSync Technology , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Jon Stewart Pokes Democrats For Cynical Keystone XL Pipeline Ploy

Supporters of the Keystone XL Pipeline claim it’ll create jobs, but as Jon Stewart pointed out on Thursday night’s “Daily Show,” Senate Democrats are worried about just one job: that of Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), who is fighting for her seat in a runoff election.

Landrieu is trailing in the polls and the race won’t change the balance of power in the Senate, but some Democrats have dropped their opposition to the project hoping it’ll help her keep the seat.

“So the party that lost the midterm elections because it didn’t stand for anything has decided, ‘Oh, I got an idea — what if we stood for less?'” Stewart said.

The Democrats aren’t the only ones abandoning core principles to push through this project. Republicans who claim to support property rights don’t seem too concerned that the pipeline may require extensive use of eminent domain to complete.

Watch Stewart tear into the Democrats in the clip above. Then, check out the segment below to see what he has to say about Sen. Ted Cruz & Co.

Raiders Win, End Sixteen Game Skid

2014-11-21-MiguelBlair.jpeg
Photo by Miguel Blair

Oakland, CA – For the first time this season, a late attempt to score was successful with less than two minutes remaining on the clock. Derek Carr found James Jones in the end zone for a 9-yard touchdown. That put the Raiders back on top, the Kansas City Chiefs failed to get into the red zone in the final seconds giving Oakland their first win of the season. The Raiders stunned the Chiefs 24-20 despite rallying a comeback in the fourth to tied the game.

“It’s a huge load off our shoulders,” said CB Charles Woodson. “To come into this game 0-10, that’s pressure. For us to end the game and finally find a way to come up with a win, that was unbelievable.”

Oakland snapped a 16-game losing streak dating back to November 17, 2013 under former head coach Dennis Allen. Many predicted they would finish the season 0-16. The Raiders silenced their naysayers with a remarkable performance on Thursday’s main stage. Woodson made history after sacking Alex Smith in the third quarter becoming the first NFL player in NFL history to record 50 interceptions and 20 sacks in a career.

“Man, Wood is amazing,” CB DJ Hayden said. “When he got drafted I was probably still in elementary school. For him to be out there playing at a high level, it’s a blessing and I’m glad for him. Wood’s going to be in the Hall of Fame, first ballot.”

The past three days of rain did more than end a drought in the Bay Area, it also gave the Oakland life. The Raiders maintained their lead in the first half behind RB Latavius Murray’s two touchdowns putting Oakland up 14-3 over Kansas City. Murray rushed for an 11-yard and 90-yard touchdown in the first and second quarter. But after hard hit and a fumble, Murray left the game with a mild concussion.

“We put him in there early and we got him going early,” said Raiders head coach Tony Sparano. “When you run the ball the way he ran the ball today, he earns more snaps, no doubt about it. We have to see how he comes out of this thing and see what happens in a coupe of days.”

Sebastian Janikowski’s 40-yard field goal extended Oakland’s lead 17-3 in the third quarter. But the Chiefs scored two touchdowns to tie the game 17-17. Smith connected with Anthony Fasano for a 19-yard touchdown and Jamaal Charles for a 30-yard touchdown. Cairo Santos followed with a 25-yard field goal to give Kansas City the lead for the first time. But the Raiders fought back with a late touchdown for the victory.

2014-11-21-JustinTuck.jpeg
Photo by Miguel Blair

With seconds on the clock, Smith threw an incomplete pass on fourth down. Prior to that, both Khalil Mack and Sio Moore sacked Smith on third down prompting flags due to celebrating in the back field from both Mack and Moore. An angry Tuck tried to call a quick timeout to avoid the embarrassing act of his younger teammates.

“I was so caught in the moment,” Moore said. “That was an error I have to make sure I clean up.”

“To go 17 plays on the winning drive, that’s impressive, man,” said DE Justin Tuck. “That let’s you know a little bit of moxie of no. 4 [Carr].”

Carr is no typical rookie quarterback. His poise on the 17-play drive that lasted almost half of the fourth quarter was of no average first year quarterback. Carr’s patience and confidence in getting the ball to his receivers showed. And when it got down to a third-and-one forcing him to throw the ball away, Carr picked up the first down on a sneak up the middle. With the mind of a veteran, he depended on himself on risky plays during that 80-yard drive.

“If you don’t let the hard times build you up, you’re going to fall and crumble quick,” DL Antonio Smith said on Carr. “That kid has a big heart, he’s always smiling no mater what the outcome. He’s always determined to prove to us that he can get it done and he got it done today.”