Why We Gossip

pacific standard
By Tom Jacobs

Did you hear what happened at yesterday’s meeting? Can you believe it?

If you find those sort of quietly whispered questions about your co-workers irresistible, you’re hardly alone. But why are we drawn to gossip?

A new study suggests it’s because the rumors, innuendo and hearsay are ultimately all about us — where we rate in the unofficial local hierarchy, and how we might improve our standing.

“Gossip recipients tend to use positive and negative group information to improve, promote and protect the self,” writes a research team led by Elena Martinescu of the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. “Individuals need evaluative information about others to evaluate themselves.”

Writing in the journal Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, the researchers describe two experiments testing the personal value gossip recipients derive. The first featured 178 university undergraduates who had all previously worked on at least one course assignment with a group of four or more students.

Participants “were asked to recall and write a short description of an incident in which a group members shared with them either positive or negative information about another group member’s confidence,” the researchers write. (Eighty-five received a positive report, 93 a negative one.)

They then reported their level of agreement with a series of statements. Some of these measured the self-improvement value of the gossip (“The information received made me think I can learn a lot from X”); others measured its self-promotion value (“The information I received made me feel that I am doing well compared to X”). Still others measured whether the gossip raised personal concerns (“The information I received made me feel that I must protect my image in the group”).

In the second experiment, 122 undergraduates were assigned the role of “sales agent” at a major company. They received gossip from a colleague that a third person either did very well or very badly at a performance evaluation, and were then debriefed about the emotions that information evoked. They also responded to the aforementioned set of statements presented to participants in the first experiment.

In each experiment, participants found both negative and positive gossip to be of personal value, albeit for different reasons. “Positive gossip has self-improvement value,” they write. “Competence-related positive gossip about others contains lessons about how to improve one’s own competence.”

On the flip side, “negative gossip has self-promotion value, because it provides individuals with social comparison information that justifies self-promoting judgments, which results in feelings of pride.”

“Contrary to lay perceptions,” the researchers assert, “most negative gossip is not intended to hurt the target, but to please the gossiper and receiver.”

In addition, the results “showed that negative gossip elicited self-protection concerns,” the researchers write. “Negative gossip makes people concerned that their reputations may be at risk, as they may personally become targets of negative gossip in the future, which generates fear.”

Fear is hardly a pleasant sensation, of course, but it can be a motivating one. As Martinescu and her colleagues put it: “Gossip conveniently provides individuals with indirect social-comparison information about relevant others.”

In other words, if you don’t want to be viewed as a goof-off like Charley, you’d better get your act together.

It’s worth noting that this study did not look at who-is-sleeping-with-who gossip, which presumably has a somewhat different function — although news that an illicit couple has gotten caught could certainly serve as a cautionary tale.

But it does show that beyond providing “emotional catharsis and social control,” confidentially treaded information about the competence, or lack thereof, of a co-worker can be “an essential resource for self-evaluation.”

Pass the word.

88-Year-Old Stabs Wife, Injures Self Because He Didn't Want To Be A Burden: Cops

COLUMBIA, Mo. (AP) — Police say an 88-year-old central Missouri man accused of fatally stabbing his 86-year-old wife told investigators he didn’t want the couple to be a burden on their family.

The Columbia Daily Tribune reports (http://bit.ly/1nY5Gd2 ) Donald Marvin Rowland was charged Friday with first-degree murder and armed criminal action. The Boone County prosecutor requested cash-only bond of $1 million, but it wasn’t clear if Rowland was jailed. Court records didn’t list a lawyer.

Columbia police were called Friday afternoon to the couple’s home after an adult daughter reported finding them in their bed.

Police said in a probable-cause statement that the wife, Betty Rowland, was stabbed in the chest and Donald Rowland had what appeared to be self-inflicted injuries.

A neighbor told the newspaper that Betty Rowland had recently had a stroke.

___

Information from: Columbia Daily Tribune, http://www.columbiatribune.com

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Voting Rights — And Voting Wrongs

They don’t want you voting. So vote!!!

Is Bipartisanship Possible?

As the 2014 midterm elections grind down to their conclusion, voters in many communities continue to be subjected to wave after wave of negative ads. The obvious solution is to take big money out of politics, but another tactic would be to promote bipartisanship, to somehow dispel the rancor between Democrats and Republicans. Is bipartisanship possible? Or is the U.S. too polarized?

A recent Pew Research study concluded the U.S. is becoming more polarized:


1. “The share of Americans who express consistently conservative or consistently liberal opinions has doubled over the past two decades, from 10% to 21%.”

2. “Partisan antipathy has risen. The share of Republicans who have very unfavorable opinions of the Democratic Party has jumped from 17% to 43% in the last 20 years. Similarly, the share of Democrats with very negative opinions of the Republican Party also has more than doubled, from 16% to 38%.”

3. “About six-in-ten (63%) consistent conservatives and 49% of consistent liberals say most of their close friends share their political views.”

4. “Differences between the right and left go beyond politics… Nearly four times as many liberals as conservatives say it is important that their community has racial and ethnic diversity; about three times as many conservatives as liberals say it is important that many in the community share their religious faith.”

5. “The center has gotten smaller: 39% of Americans currently take a roughly equal number of liberal and conservative positions, down from 49% in surveys conducted in 1994 and 2004.”

6. “The most ideologically oriented Americans make their voices heard through greater participation in every stage of the political process.”

7. “To those on the ideological right and left, compromise now means that their side gets more of what it wants.”

In a nutshell, Americans are more partisan and more insular.

The new Pew Research Center political typology poll segmented the American political electorate into eight groups based upon degree of partisanship. There were three clusters. The first is “The Partisan Anchors,” the Republican and Democratic base: “Steadfast Conservatives” (19 percent), “Business Conservatives” (17 percent), and “Solid Liberals” (21 percent).

When we compare “Solid Liberals” to “Steadfast Conservatives” we see the challenges for bipartisanship. Ninety-eight percent of Liberals described themselves as “consistently liberal” or “mostly liberal.” Ninety-three percent of Conservatives said they were “mostly conservative” or “consistently conservative.”

Liberals believe the “U.S.’s best years are ahead of us;” Conservatives believe the U.S.’s best years are behind us.” Thirty-nine percent of Liberals believe the one-year economic outlook “will be better;” 56 percent of Conservatives believe it “will be worse.” Seventy-nine percent of Liberals believe the “U.S. is successful because of its ability to change;” 78 percent of Conservatives believe the “U.S. is successful because of its reliance on long-standing principles.”

Most Liberals agree “Wall St hurts economy more than helps;” most Conservatives — particularly business conservatives — believe Wall Street helps the economy. Most Liberals believe “Economic systems favors the powerful,” Conservatives disagree.

When asked the question, “I would vote against any official who voted to raise taxes,” 79 percent of Liberals disagree but 77 percent of Conservatives agree.

Seventy-three percent of Liberals believe “Government should do more to solve problems,” whereas 87 percent of Conservatives believe “Government is already doing too much.” Not surprisingly, 91 percent of Liberals agreed “Government aid to the poor does more good than harm” but 86 percent of Conservatives disagreed.

Predictably, Liberals and Conservatives have diametrically opposed views on most important issues. Eighty-six percent of Liberals approve of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare); 94 percent of Conservatives disapprove. (87 percent of Liberals agree that is “the government’s responsibility to ensure all have healthcare coverage;” 92 percent of conservatives believe it is not the government’s responsibility.)

Ninety-six percent of Liberals believe that immigrants “should be eligible for citizenship if meet certain requirements;” only half of Conservatives agree.

Eighty-one percent of Liberals believe that it is more important to control gun ownership than to protect it; 89 percent of Conservatives disagree.

Seventy-eight percent of Liberals believe “the earth is getting warmer because of fossil fuels;” 75 percent of Conservatives believe “there is no evidence the earth is getting warmer.”

Predictably, 95 percent of Liberals believe alternative energy should be the focus of U.S. energy policy; 66 percent of Conservatives believe expanding oil and gas production should be the focus.

Eighty-seven percent of Liberals believe that affirmative action “is a good thing;” 60 percent of conservatives believe affirmative action “is a bad thing.”

Eighty percent of Liberals believe that “racial discrimination is the main reason many black people can’t get ahead.” Eighty-nine percent of Conservatives disagree, “Blacks who can’t get ahead are responsible for their own condition.”

There are stark differences between Liberals and Conservatives. The United States is growing more partisan and more insular. It’s hard to imagine how there could be bipartisanship.

But is possible to imagine how the Liberal view will prevail. Conservatives are predominantly old (67 percent are 50-plus), white (87 percent are white, non-Hispanic), and men (about 60 percent). The tide of demographics will ultimately erode Conservatism.

Power Blackout Hits Bangladesh As Line From India Fails

DHAKA, Bangladesh (AP) — Bangladesh was struggling to restore power hours after a transmission line bringing electricity from neighboring India failed on Saturday, causing a nationwide blackout, and officials said it would take at least 12 more hours to repair the system.

The blackout swept across the impoverished and energy-starved South Asian nation at around noon, after the transmission line experienced a “technical glitch” that led to a cascade of failures throughout the national power grid, with power plants and substations shutting down, said Masum-Al-Beruni, managing director of the state-run Power Grid Company of Bangladesh Ltd.

The company restarted some power plants and restored electricity to some areas of the country for a few hours Saturday afternoon. But the plants were not operating as normal and had to be shut down again, two power company officials said on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the situation with media.

They said they were investigating the problem, but that it would take at least 12 hours to repair the national grid and restore power to the capital, Dhaka, a city of more than 10 million people.

bangladesh
A Bangladesh fishmonger lights his fish stall with candles during a power blackout in Dhaka on Nov. 1, 2014. (MUNIR UZ ZAMAN/AFP/Getty Images)

Dhaka’s hospitals and the international airport were continuing to operate, with emergency generators supplying power. But many offices normally open on Saturdays had to send their employees home.

“This is terrible,” said Mohammad Hasan, a resident of Dhaka’s upscale Bashundhara neighborhood. “We had some confidence in the government over last few years that the power sector was improving slowly. But what is this?”

As night fell Saturday, most of Dhaka remained dark, though officials said they had restored some power to strategic buildings, including major government hospitals, the president’s house and the prime minister’s residence.

An aide to Beruni said technicians were working to restore the link with India. “Our work is progressing fast. We hope to restore the system to a great extent, if not entirely,” said Mir Motahar Hossain.

Bangladesh is considered one of the most energy-poor nations, with one of the lowest per capita electricity consumption rates in the world. More than a third of Bangladesh’s 166 million people still have no access to electricity, while the country often is able to produce only some of its 11,500-megawatt generation capacity.

bangladesh
A Bangladesh woman fans a sick child during a power blackout at a hospital in Dhaka on Nov. 1, 2014. (STR/AFP/Getty Images)

Power outages blamed on inefficient and dated grid infrastructure, as well as poor management, are common in Bangladesh, though Saturday’s blackout was the country’s worst since 2007, when a powerful cyclone that killed about 2,500 people knocked out the national grid for several hours.

Bangladesh has tried to improve its energy situation, extending access to electricity to about 3.45 million more people since 2008. Last year, it started to import electricity from India through the 400-kilovolt transmission line, which runs from Baharampur in the Indian state of West Bengal to the town of Bheramara in southwestern Bangladesh.

It also has signed agreements with energy companies in Russia, Japan, China and the United States to build power plants and improve energy infrastructure.

Is It Possible To Craft A Great Novel In Just 30 Days?

Is it possible to craft a great novel in just 30 days?

Nope.

But you can do something better: You can craft a reasonably unhorrible first draft of a novel in 30 days.

Here’s why that trumps greatness every time:

1) When you embrace the fact that your first draft is going to be flawed, you free yourself from the impossibly high expectations that can make creative projects so miserable. Aiming for completion rather than perfection takes the pressure off, and the ensuing feelings of joy and discovery come through in your prose. As Chuck Wendig has pointed out, the less you worry about the outcome of a writing project, the better it often turns out.

This also helps explain Rainbow Rowell’s discovery that, when you write for quantity instead of quality, you can end up getting both.

2) Using a warts-and-all, don’t-look-back approach gives you a huge amount of writerly momentum. Novels get derailed by so many things: Work, family, self-doubt, a new season of Game of Thrones, a small turtle crossing the road, etc. Which is why having lots of creative momentum is essential to getting your book finished. The nice thing about bashing out a beautifully flawed first draft is that you are flying, and the hurdles that would normally have knocked you for a loop barely register as speed bumps. Sure, the sentences aren’t pretty, but you’re focusing on the more important task of getting a beginning, middle, and end down on paper. Which brings me to…

3) Tolerating inconsistent, awkward, derivative, and generally un-great prose in your first draft will save you months of work in the long run. We often don’t discover what (or who) our books are really about until we’ve written through to the end of them. The first order of business in a second draft is often cutting or changing large swaths of the manuscript so everything lines up with the new story, tone, or cast of characters. If you try to make every paragraph beautiful right out of the gate, you’ll spend countless hours perfecting prose that will only need to be rewritten or cut. A reasonably unhorrible first draft lets you hold off on the fine-tuning and put those priceless revision hours in the stuff readers are more likely to see.

To me, that’s pretty great.

Happy writing, everyone!

Chris Baty is the author of No Plot? No Problem!: A Low-Stress, High-Velocity Guide to Writing a Novel in 30 Days.

Beyonce And Blue Ivy Dress Up As Janet And Michael Jackson

We thought nothing could be cuter than Blue Ivy’s bee costume last Halloween, but we were totally wrong.

Blue Ivy and Beyonce paid tribute to pop royalty when they dressed up as Michael and Janet Jackson for Halloween 2014. Beyonce’s daughter looked absolutely precious as she sported Michael Jackson’s iconic red and gold military jacket, shades and fedora. The 33-year-old singer went as Janet Jackson in her memorable “Rhythm Nation” music video, rocking an all-black outfit and baseball cap. The mother-daughter duo snapped a precious photo in their costumes backstage at Power 105.1’s Powerhouse concert in New York City, where Jay Z performed. Check out the adorable photo Beyonce posted to Instagram Friday:

Janet and MJ

A photo posted by Beyoncé (@beyonce) on Oct 10, 2014 at 2:39pm PDT

See more photos of celebrity children dressed up for Halloween here. If you need us, we’ll be blasting “Thriller.”

Kevin Spacey's Random Impression Proves Bill Clinton Would Make A Great Ghostbuster

Kevin Spacey ain’t afraid of no random impression.

On Friday, Jimmy Fallon got Kevin Spacey to play a special Halloween version of “Wheel of Impressions,” and it was awesome. The impressions this time around include Johnny Carson talking about costume parties, Bill Clinton’s views on “Ghostbusters” and even Christopher Walken explaining the consequences of not giving him a treat.

“The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon” airs weeknights at 11:35 p.m. ET on NBC.

Want To Turn You Bathroom Into Your Bath Realm?

A Knight To Remember Gothic Bath Tissue HolderThe toilet has long been referred to as the “throne.” Probably to go along with the tired old cliché that a man’s home is his castle. Still, what fun it would be to turn your bathroom into your “bath realm” since that is where the throne is. Images of knights, fair maidens, and dragons may abound. You could start with this A Knight To Remember Gothic Bath Tissue Holder and be the envy of all you survey.

Hussein Chalayan: Innovative, Fantastic, Beyond Avant-Garde Designs

Chalayan's TableTop DressRead all about Hussein Chalayan, the British/Turkish/Cypriot designer who has won acclaim for his fantastical fusion of art, science and fashion and whose creations incorporate elements of modern interiors, urban architecture and geometric structures.