Sprint Samsung ATIV S Neo Windows Phone 8.1 Update Released

Samsung ATIV S Neo

It has been a couple of months since Microsoft released Windows Phone 8.1 for all supported devices. However, one must always factor in carrier delays when trying to figure out when a new software update is going to land. Its no different with Windows Phone 8.1, which may have landed on AT&T’s ATIV S Neo last month, but has taken until today for Sprint to roll it out. Samsung ATIV S Neo owners on Sprint will now start receiving an over-the-air update which brings up their device to the latest iteration of Microsoft’s mobile platform.

The update carries firmware version 2216.14.11.2 and bumps up the core OS to Windows Phone 8.1. There aren’t any additional changes included in the update, but then again, WP8.1 is a massive update in and of itself.

It adds a plethora of new features to the device, including but not limited to Cortana, which is Microsoft’s virtual private assistant for Windows Phone. Support for folders and wallpapers on Start screen, Action Center, VPN support, refreshed native apps, swipe typing and more is all included in this major update.

Since the update is being released over-the-air, it may take a couple of days to go live across all regions. Sprint has finally rolled out this update, its WP lineup isn’t stellar as it is, at least existing users can now take advantage of the latest features. The carrier has already stopped selling Windows Phone devices online, but commits to continue support for the platform.

Sprint Samsung ATIV S Neo Windows Phone 8.1 Update Released

, original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

The Chips are your headphones for every occasion

Chips

We love listening to our tunes throughout the day, but we usually have several different methods of getting the music to our ears. There are speakers, headphones, ear buds, and even bone conduction systems to try and deliver your music to you in the most efficient and comfortable way possible. If you’re an avid outdoor explorer, and wish you had headphones that could match your stride, then you’re going to want a pair that is multi-functional so you won’t have to switch out.

That’s where the Chips come in. These are all-in-one headphones that can handle rough and tough, but have more functionality than the average set. Sporting 40mm drivers and equipped with over-sized buttons on the outside, you can rock out without having to fiddle with your phone to control everything . It has an IPX4 rating, meaning it doesn’t mind the occasional splash of water, and can handle temperatures down to -4 degrees Fahrenheit. You can take calls, ask Siri a question, and skip a track all with the push of a button.

They look a bit like two circles attached by a colorful noodle, but it’s the accessories that it comes with which make it truly multi-functional. You’ll be looking at paying $95-150 for either a wired or wireless pair of Chips, and both come with a headband, beanie, K-roo helmet pouch, cuff beanie, and an exoskeleton. Essentially, this gives you the all the options you could want for wherever life may take you.

Available for crowdfunding on Kickstarter

 
[ The Chips are your headphones for every occasion copyright by Coolest Gadgets ]

Meet The Judges Of Hardware Battlefield 2015

robot-2015 We’re excited to announce the all-star investors, founders and makers judging the startups in the second annual Hardware Battlefield. From Martha Stewart, to 50 Cent, to Yves Behar, and many more, we’ve lined up 13 individuals who know what it takes to make a successful product and company. Over the three days of International Consumer Electronics Show, these judges will work… Read More

Where Fashion, Pop Art and Perspective Meet Performance

2014-12-07-Materialist_Magazine_Rodnik_Band_Jocelyn_Jeffery.jpgPhoto by Simon Archer Hurlstone

Philip Colbert created fashion label The Rodnik Band, which plays with pop art to create dresses that replicate artwork like Marcel Duchamp’s Urinal. He talks about the tendency of fashion to take itself too seriously and describes discussions of collaborating on a philosophical fashion line with Swiss philosopher Alain de Botton.

Jeffery: How did you decide to incorporate pop art into your designs?

Colbert: It stemmed from the fact that pop art contains bold, bright colors and ideas; it’s about communicating to people in a very direct way. I like that approach to clothing because the meaning of fashion can be hard to ascertain. Fashion can take itself very seriously so to make something that has a more humorous impact can result in a wearable item that has intellectual value. A satire with a Claus Oldenburg sculpture as a dress makes it accessible for anyone outside of the fashion clique. There is a fun art history reference there, whereas when it’s playing on the trends of fashion it is hard to put your finger on what the actual value is. Satisfying trends for trends’ sake is not particularly meaningful.

Jeffery: One of the main problems with fashion and fashion criticism is the fact that it can be too self-referential so it’s refreshing to take fashion outside of the box. Do you view pop art as an easily identifiable branch of art for people without a depth of knowledge in the field?

Colbert: I love pop art in general but I do get slightly sickened by an Andy Warhol screen print. It is heavily repeatable so there is a lack of contact from the artist. But what I do love about pop art is the fact that it engages with the pop culture that we live in, which is without question the biggest influence in modern day life. I very much like things that have a sense of language and communicate directly. There are so many amazing pop artists like Claus Oldenburg whose work has complete intellectual value but also brings an element of surrealism and fantasy into everyday life. Simple things like his oversized cherry in the center of a city or a giant ice cream cone on top of a building, melting, play on perspective. This handling and translating of ideas allows for cartoonlike sets. It’s a nice mix of reality and animation and I like the sense of escapism that pop art can have.

Jeffery: Do you find it important to merge art and fashion because they are both extremely reflective of the society that we live in?

Colbert: I was always more interested in art than in fashion and by getting into fashion in a random way I used the platform of clothing to express artistic ideas. It was my way of making it interesting for myself and also for the sort of woman whom I want to dress. I very much like the idea that my clothes are wearable art in a tongue in cheek way. Fashion obviously has a value and an allure but I’d rather it have a more artistic identity than a fashion identity.

Jeffery: How did you get into fashion?

Colbert: I did philosophy at university and one thing lead to another and I found myself doing clothing. I was very much out of my depth to begin with because I had never trained in it. The more I got involved in creating a brand and selling clothes, the more I started developing my own thoughts on what I wanted the brand to be. If I can run a fashion label, anyone can do it. And I like that spirit because fashion can take itself very seriously. It’s a cliquey world so to come at it with a hyper whacky attitude, when things actually go well, is a powerful combination.

Jeffery: Can you describe the collaboration you were in talks of working on with Swiss philosopher Alain de Botton?

Colbert: We did a series of interviews together for Vogue and we talked about the idea of doing a philosophical fashion line. It was a fun idea but it didn’t get beyond the conceptual stages.

Jeffery: What does a philosophical fashion line entail?

Colbert: That was the challenge. The idea was to create a language of union in clothing. Clothing does already have a meaning, socially and historically. In a social context it represents several important ideas and movements. But I always assume that clothing is very psychological in the sense that people wear things to express certain ideas about themselves. Let’s say you did a lecture series of clothes and you created a building block, millions of different outfits. Say you had some template outfits in black and they were cut with a certain silhouette to represent seriousness and you’d wear those on a serious day. Then you could potentially accept certain additional ideas that would help you refine your mood that day. The challenge with the project was to map out a meaning, a language of clothing. Once it has been mapped out then one could have more fun with building a narrative.

Jeffery: It’s challenging to translate that idea into the literal sense.

Colbert: Yeah for sure. In art, people do it all the time, create their own language. But clothing always has that challenge of having a practical use. Obviously fashion is an art but the reality of fashion is that it’s a cynical, hardcore business. To exist it has to operate in a very crude world of selling things in numbers and appealing to generic markets, which don’t necessarily always understand a sophisticated idea. People can definitely do very sophisticated things and be successful but not always can such things find a commercial audience. Whereas with art, you come up with an idea, and if people buy it once, the buyers buy it, and it doesn’t have to be resold 1,000 times. But with clothing there is always the need to be ultimately commercial. It makes it slightly more of a business challenge.

Jeffery: From where does the British vibe of the brand originate?

Colbert: Even though I was born in Scotland, I still feel British in a way. I love Scotland as a country but I’m not a hardcore Scottish nationalist. London is an adopted home and what I love about England is that abstract cartoon-like language of the buses and The Queen. It’s a fun brand world — it has a strong identity internationally. When I was selling in America being from London was definitely the brand identity. So I thought well I might as well embrace that. Britain is easy to feel even when you’re abroad. There is a history of satire and humor in things so it’s nice to play on that. I like to playfully reference things like The Sex Pistols because they’re a fun example of a fashion/music cross over. It’s quite a progressive concept of creating a band and a brand together. So the joke band that I have alongside my fashion label plays on representing fashion in a more lighthearted way and breaking the mold slightly from the conventional approach.

Jeffery: Can you explain the concept of the joke band further?

Colbert: The band concept came after I was selling at the store Barneys and I was like, “how do I make the label compete when it’s not known in America? How do I bring it to peoples attention in a guerilla fashion?” I’d been thinking about the band as this amazing vehicle of travelling, touring and taking the dream and the lifestyle on the road. Fashion can be quite cynical in the sense that it’s often fake and contrived. So I did a world tour in 2009 of all the stores. I played in Barney’s, stores in Japan and in Comme Des Garcons. It was quite funny taking this spinal tap-like fashion band on tour and playing in dry environments like department stores. It’s definitely comical. There was genuine laughter at this gig (at Scotch in London) last night because I made a big step by getting a Japanese pop group to become my band. Previously my band was always just fill-ins: people helping out as the backing instruments. But because of that it never felt like a real band, it was more of a joke. So last night, even though it was still a joke, it was actually fluid and real. Also these guys brought a lot to the table because they were very funny. They’re kooky Japanese girls and they had pink wigs on and were wearing crazy sequin crab and beer dresses. One of them even did a back flip on stage. It was like a comedy show. They were coming up with all sorts of funny stories and their songs themselves were quite amusing. They’re about banal things like toothpaste and scotch tape and they sing in Japanese accents. It was definitely a funny marriage between the Rodnick world and these guys. What I liked about last night is that it wasn’t just dressing a conventionally pretty pop group through their record label for X Factor, which is all very contrived and boring like Blackberry communication. These were genuine girls with personality and spirit. They’re not conventional but they’re definitely cool, quirky and inspiring in fashion because they’re real characters.

From "The Nutcracker" to the NFL: Celebrating Auditorium Theatre's 125 Years

One of my favorite Chicago theatre memories to date is when Broadway in Chicago presented Fuerza Bruta – a theatrical event that I can only describe as a near-chaotic interactive dance party performance art. While the experience itself proved jaw-dropping, what elevated it was the venue. All the action took place on the Auditorium Theatre‘s stage – and from that vantage point, you could look out and see the venue’s vast grandeur: the nearly 4,000 seats, the tiered balcony, the golden arches, the curtained boxes. It simply took my breath away.

While I’ve been to the Auditorium Theatre many times before, this perspective made me realize why this space is considered a Chicago landmark. Nestled on the east edge of Chicago’s loop, it’s our golden gem. And this gem is now celebrating an unparalleled 125-year anniversary, crowned by a celebration on December 9.

This event promises an eclectic evening of dance, musicianship and good, old-school showbiz. Highlights include the Chicago Symphony Orchestra, the Joffrey Ballet and a performance by Broadway powerhouse Patti LuPone, whose great-grand-aunt, soprano Adelina Patti, performed at the venue’s gala opening in 1889.

In honoring this landmark milestone, I took a moment to speak with Auditorium Theatre’s Executive Director Brett Batterson about his personal history with the space and what he sees for its future.

Batterson, who’s led the venue since 2004, highlighted that over the past 125 years, the theatre has had milestone moments in nearly every decade. “We gave birth to the Lyric Opera and the Chicago Symphony Orchestra,” he notes. “During the late ’60s, nearly every great rock icon performed here, including Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix and and Jim Morrison — who, according to legend, was arrested after leaving the stage for allegedly flashing the audience.”

Beyond its celebrated history, what makes the venue so special? “Our versatility,” says Batterson. “The original architects Dankmar Adler and Louis Sullivan made the venue flexible to host a wide variety of events and artists.” The space has gone through a few significant restorations, including a grand reopening in 1967 after a 20-year shutdown, and in the early ’90s and 2000s to modernize the space for big-budget mega-musicals such as Phantom and Les Miz.

But while pretty architecture and noteworthy history are great, it’s the programming and talent that bring in patrons. Beyond musical theatre fare, “we’re the only performing arts venue in the Chicago loop that hosts such an eclectic mix of entertainment, including world-class ballet, opera, rock concerts, and original programming — as well as Broadway in Chicago,” Batterson explains. “And on Sunday, we host church.”

The venue’s versatility clearly makes for a strong selling point to presenters and audience members. In fact, when the NFL was looking for a space to host the 2015 draft, they selected the Auditorium Theatre out of all the possible venues in the country because of this asset. “This is truly a testament to Adler and Sullivan, who ensured the space was flexible for any type of event,” notes Batterson. Once the Mayor’s office did the heavy lifting of getting the NFL to consider Chicago and the Auditorium Theatre, “the theatre simply had to sell itself.”

Most importantly, the exposure the venue will receive when the draft airs in April next year will be off the charts. “In our 125 years, we’ve accommodated more than 20 million patrons,” notes Batterson. “But in just three days, more than 50 million people will see the venue – which is staggering.”

Not to mention the positive economic impact this will have on Chicago, which could be in the hundreds of millions.

Certainly, a bright future exists for the Auditorium Theatre. “While I can’t pretend to foresee what entertainment will look like in the next 125 years, I do know that we all have a basic human need to share experiences, laughter and tears,” says Batterson. “Live entertainment will always be relevant and essential, and the Auditorium Theatre will be here to deliver that.”

Visit auditoriumtheatre.org for more information on the Auditorium Theatre’s 125th season.

Small Business: The 'Neglected Middle' of Climate Change

One week after graduating college, I started a summer internship at an energy auditing firm in the DC area. On my second day, I asked my boss why the firm never took on small businesses as clients. It was a logical thought in my head: they use energy and there are millions of them! His response was simple.

“They’re just too small to be worth anyone’s time.”

He went on to lecture his naive intern that small businesses don’t use enough energy, don’t have big enough footprints, and don’t care enough about energy efficiency to be worth our or anyone’s time.

My boss couldn’t have been more wrong.

His response was speaking solely to the financial feasibility of the firm, but it reflects a larger misconception regarding small businesses and climate change.

Individually, a small business might use less energy than a 50-story office building. But cumulatively, small businesses in the U.S. alone contribute roughly $60 billion in annual energy costs and nearly half a billion metric tons of annual carbon emissions each year. That’s equivalent to powering half the homes in the U.S. every year. Now consider the number of small businesses across the world, and the environmental impact becomes significant.

So why do we continue to leave the small business community out of the climate change conversation when talking about energy? Why have our small businesses become this “neglected middle,” stuck in between our skyscrapers and our homes?

I believe it’s because our small businesses are misunderstood, both physically and culturally.

Small businesses are unique, which is one of the reasons why we love our neighborhood coffee shop or boutique retailer so much. But, because they are so unique, they generally don’t follow a pattern when it comes to building activity, size, location and even how they use energy from one to the next. This has created a struggle for the industry to create a solution that can address energy efficiency for all types of small businesses. And since it doesn’t make financial sense for the private for-profit sector to work with them in most cases (as my old boss pointed out), the result has been a combination of overly generic “green tips” on the Internet and professional solicitors with trust issues.

But we must find a way to do more. We need to include small business as part of the climate change conversation, not only as a contributor, but also as part of the solution.

We need to start by raising awareness: bringing attention to the fact that our local mom and pop shops must be every bit as much a part of this conversation as our skyscrapers and our homes; that the cumulative impact of the small business community is so significant that we must give attention at the individual level.

We must also raise awareness and provide scalable assistance to small business owners themselves. We need to find solutions to assist them in recognizing what they can do to not only reduce their environmental impact, but also decrease their own operational costs and increase profits at the same time.

The truth is not all small businesses might be concerned with climate change. But they’re all concerned about the success of their business. In fact, most small business owners are already feeling the effect of rising energy costs, either by raising their own prices or changing their hiring plans. We need to recognize that financial longevity is the primary business motivator and foster that to drive urgent change on an environmental level. Because when it comes to business, energy efficiency isn’t about “green business,” it’s about “smart business.”

We need to begin looking at this “neglected middle” not as a challenge, but as an opportunity. With more attention and action being deployed on the local and state level, including energy policy and sustainability outreach programs, small businesses could serve to push community-level initiatives even further. Our local businesses are such an integral part of our communities. They often drive culture in the community and can be an influencer on community members. By assisting them to drive positive change in environmental sustainability and energy efficiency, it could have a ripple effect throughout the rest of the community.

Small businesses power this country. It’s time that we help them use their own power more efficiently and harness their potential to drive a cumulative, global impact on climate change. We already “shop small” — it’s time that we start to “save small,” too.

A Holiday Letter to the Supreme Court

2014-12-06-10408518_10154965460810604_3015594686860851372_n.jpg

Dear Chief Justice and Justices,

This time of year is the time of lists and letters. Children all over the world put pen to paper and write the Big Guy with their dreams and wishes for Christmas morning. I am writing to you instead of Santa as I am hoping for a Christmas/holiday miracle this year. 2008 was a big year for our family, as my husband and I were legally married in California by the Reverend (and fabulous international DJ) Jeb Edwards. We knew that our marriage in California wouldn’t be legal here in Michigan, but we felt very strongly about showing our three year old adopted daughter the importance of commitment so we did it anyways. Both of our parents recently celebrated their 50th anniversaries, so our families know and value the importance of love and commitment, gay or straight.

The next year, 2009, our son came to live with us from the Michigan foster care system. Our son’s parents didn’t take care of him, so the state stepped in and placed him in foster care to stop the abuse and neglect. However, because of the state’s laws, only my husband has legal custody of him, not me. We were able to jointly adopt our daughter back in 2006, but the judicial views on this practice changed, and to this date, I am not a legal guardian to my son of almost six years. This needs to change.

On January 9th, 2015, you’ll consider the case of April DeBoer and Jayne Rowse. Their case is similar to our situation, they’re nurses and we’re teachers and we both share children that aren’t legally ours in this state. The balance and safety of our collective families is in your hands. Every kid deserves a family, every kid deserves parents that can take care of them and protect them should anything happen. Currently, our families do not have that protection.

Our wish this season is that you’ll rule in our favor and reinstate marriage equality in Michigan and perhaps in all of the United States (hey, it’s Christmas, we can dream big right?) We don’t need silly ties, gift cards, or fruitcake, what we need is the ability to be a parent to our children no matter what happens. And, on a personal note, I’d love to finally be legally married to my partner of 19 years. We’ve outlasted many of our heterosexual friends’ marriages without the legal protection the state offers.

The schmaltzy songs of the season speak about love, family, and warm memories of holidays past. We’d love to remember this holiday season as the year we were finally a family under Michigan law. Governor Snyder and Attorney General Schuette gave the LGBT families in Michigan big lumps of coal when they ruled against us and nullified the marriages of many last month; they are definitely on the naughty list in our book. It’s time to change this law and allow us to be the families we were meant to be: secure, safe, and full of love and joy.
It’s not too much to ask in our opinion.

Happy Holidays from Tom, Tod, Anna, and Eli McMillen-Oakley!

10 Health Findings From 2014 Every Parent Should Know About

Much of parenting is learned through experience; much is learned through guidance from trusted friends, family members and experts and much comes from straight instinct alone.

But when it comes to understanding children’s health, a lot can be gleaned from tuning into the latest scientific research — with the understanding that science is a process and that studies need to be replicated many times before they’re set in any kind of stone.

With that in mind, here are just 10 of the more notable health findings to come out of the medical literature in 2014 that every parent should be aware of and feel empowered to discuss with their child’s health care provider as it pertains to them.

A Call to Self-Examination and Prayer

Just over a week after the news from Ferguson, a grand jury in my own home town of New York has refused to indict a police officer in the death of a black man suspected of a crime. This time there is not even the pretense of an explanation. Now we find ourselves in the aftermath of the Staten Island grand jury decision. I struggle to find the words to express myself that go beyond a rant at a gross injustice. I struggle to find something spiritually helpful in his senseless loss of life. I feel even sadder now than I did ten days ago. I am also more horrified.

I am horrified, for one thing, by the video of Eric Garner’s death. How could one not be horrified–an unarmed man posing no apparent threat to the large number of police officers surrounding him (it looks like at least eight to me) on a charge, at most, of selling untaxed cigarettes (an allegation of which I, at least, have seen no evidence).

Lethal force over untaxed cigarettes is horrifying enough. The horror becomes all the more intense, though, if this chain of events was set in place because of the color of someone’s skin. We are told that it wasn’t. I want to tell you why I do not believe that.

The day after the Staten Island decision morning I rode the B Train from 110th Street in Manhattan to Bryant Park at 42nd St. I like the B Train. I can almost always get a seat.

There were two barely teenage boys, perhaps 13 or maybe 14, sitting across from me, although separated by several empty places. They were not together. One was black. One was white. I doubt that is why they were separated. I suspect they were just on their way to different middle schools somewhere down the line, or perhaps escaping one up the line.

I was struck by how alike they behaved in a very typical 13-year-old-boy way. The one directly across from me pulled up the hood on his coat, leaned all the way over to rest his head on his backpack, and went to sleep. The other one leaned back against the wall of the train and closed his eyes. Thirteen-year-old boys are nocturnal creatures.

I wondered if their mothers had sent each of them off earlier in the morning, maybe with a kiss on the cheek, which 13-year-old-boys will sometimes still allow, and perhaps a lunch or snack for later in the day. I’m pretty sure their mothers sent them off with the admonition to be careful. I’m pretty sure the black mother sent her son off to school with more anxiety than the other, although all mothers of teenage boys have every reason to be anxious. It did occur to me, though, that one might be more likely to come home safely than the other.

Before the one in front of me leaned over and went to sleep, I noticed him look at me. He looked at me several times. And he looked at me suspiciously, very suspiciously. He was the black one. I remember thinking I understood why he might be looking suspiciously at the white guy across from him, particularly that morning.

And then the really horrible revelation. Was I projecting? Was what I perceived really my suspicion of him and not so much his of me? God, I hope not, but if I’m honest with myself, I can’t tell you I absolutely know for sure. It calls for me to examine myself carefully.

It seems to me that this is where we have to start, and that this current season of Advent is a particularly good time to do it. We must begin with self-examination, a painfully honest self-examination.

And now what I’m going to say is particularly difficult. The self-examination must begin with white people, such as myself.

I say this carefully and regretfully, but also from my heart. For one thing, I am a white person. I have no business telling black people what they need to examine in a situation like this. And besides, it’s not the same thing. Black people may have racial prejudices, but they do not generally make the power structure work based on them because the power structure is more in hands the color which is more like mine.

Just as an example, I saw the former mayor of New York, Rudy Giuliani, comment on the Staten Island grand jury yesterday and ridicule the current mayor and others who took issue with it. He reminded his audience of the importance of process and that in this case the process had reached its result. And then he reminded those who watched that, after all, Eric Garner, the dead man, had just committed a crime when he was killed, something which, by the way, no jury, grand or otherwise, had a chance to consider. That’s the difference between those with power and those without. Those with power get the process. Some systemic self-examination might be in order.

There’s another reason to start with white people. I was brought up to notice skin color and to breathe in racism with no more intentionality than I breathed the air around me. I’m sure my parents and grandparents made no decision to do so. It just got passed on. That’s the nature of original sin, after all. It just gets passed on as naturally as every other trait that goes with being human. And in America, this is a sin with which, with rare exception, white people just come with without any particular fault of their own. We just get it. To get rid of it is going to take some self-examination because it is difficult even to notice, so subtle is it, to say nothing of criticize.

Finally, I begin with white people because I have spent the last 26 years being a pastor primarily to white people–not exclusively, especially after I became a bishop, but primarily. And as someone who has spent a lot of years caring for the souls of white people, I know that racism threatens their spiritual health in a very profound way. What is a life or death issue for black people, as we have seen demonstrated, is an eternal life or death issue for white people. So as a white pastor to a lot of white people, I think this intense self-examination needs to begin with us.

The Episcopal Church is committed to changing this reality. We are committed to taking our part in God’s Beloved Community, to preparing the way of the Lord, to the coming of the kingdom of God. There is action coming. For now, I’m suggesting that white people such as myself begin with some serious self-examination, and that we ask our black brothers and sisters to help us like John the Baptist in calling the powers that be to account. And if we don’t do that, I suspect we have not seen anything as horrifying as what we will. And it wouldn’t hurt to pray, all of us.

Senior Citizen Thwarts Thieves With Gun Holstered Onto Walker

GASTONIA, N.C. (AP) — A 68-year-old Gastonia man says he scared off two men in ski masks trying to break in his home with his gun he can keep on his walker. And then he taped a note to his door saying if they try to break in his house again, he will be waiting on them.

Joseph Sapienza told The Gaston Gazette (http://bit.ly/1vx3JpO ) that he was watching TV Thursday night when he heard someone trying to pry open his door. He says he got his gun, put it in a holster in his walker and shuffled to the front door. He flipped on a light, yelled he was armed and threw open the door. Sapienza says the men ran away. He says he put up the note to warn any other would-be robbers.

___

Information from: The Gaston Gazette, http://www.gastongazette.com