Cortana Can Order You A Pizza From Domino’s

dominos pizza 640x457
Pizza chain Domino’s has been quick to embrace technology. Only recently it launched an app for the Pebble smartphone, allowing folks with this wearable device to track their pizza right from their wrist. Now Domino’s has tapped into the power of Cortana, the virtual private assistant found in Windows Phone, to enable users to order a pizza. So after all the times you’ve wished out loud for pizza, you now have to simply order Cortana to have one delivered.

There is just one caveat though. This is only being offered to those who live in the UK and Ireland, since there’s already an official Domino’s app for Windows Phone available in both countries. The latest release enables users to order their pizza using Cortana.

Cortana can not only order pizzas from Domino’s, it will also be able to show any deals that might be available. Commands include “Domino’s, show me deals,” “Domino’s, show me store deals,” “Domino’s, show me pizzas,” and more.

The updated app also adds support for SmartGlass which can perform similar tasks on the console, should the Domino’s customer happen to have an Xbox One as well.

As previously mentioned this is only limited to customers in the UK and Ireland for now. They can get the latest Domino’s Windows Phone app from here.

Cortana Can Order You A Pizza From Domino’s

, original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

TGI Friday’s Mistletoe Drone Injures Photographer In Brooklyn

Screen Shot 2014-12-08 at 12.02.41 PM The following sentence has never been written in the history of human language: A mistletoe-toting drone flying in a crowded Sheepshead Bay TGI Friday’s restaurant cut a photographer’s face after it careened out of another reporter’s hand. The fact that I had to write this sentence is proof that marketing departments and drone operators need some time apart.
You see, TGI… Read More

The Current State of the Men's Tennis Game

The world of professional men’s tennis… that once amateur sport which was transformed in the ’70s and ’80s by a couple of fiery left-handers named McEnroe and Connors, seems to be in a bit of a flux currently. Of course, it is the offseason right now. But the thing I am thinking is that no one, apart from the ardent fans such as myself, seems to be paying any attention to it. Considering this then, I thought that I would in this article give a bit of a recap on the year that has been and what developments may be coming up next year.

This year in the men’s game, there have been four different Slam winners, an occurrence we have not seen a lot of in recent years. The only other year since 2003 in fact that we have seen this occurrence was in 2012, when Djokovic, Nadal, Federer and Murray took out the titles. This year we only saw two of those names emerge as winners. I don’t think many people would have picked at the beginning of the year that we would have seen Stan Wawrinka and Marin Cilic each winning Slams.

The emergence of this new group of players outside of the Big Four has been one of the biggest stories in the men’s game this year. There were some members of the tennis community that said Wawrinka’s win at the Australian Open spelled the end for the Big Four. But I think that Cilic’s win at the U.S. Open was a much more telling sign of the end of the Big Four. The reason it was, was two-fold. On one side was that the final didn’t feature one of the Big Four, and the other reason was that the beaten semi-finalists were Federer and Djokovic. There was actually a third reason, which was the way they were beaten. Everyone surely knew that Cilic was one of those players with immense talent and ability to beat anyone on his day. With Kei Nishikori however, I think that the fact he beat Djokovic would have been a surprise to many.

Outside of the Slams, the Masters tournaments were dominated by Federer and Djokovic. It was to my personal disappointment though, that Wawrinka beat Federer in Monte Carlo. Wawrinka’s win in Monte Carlo however, would have shown many fans, and probably more so himself that his win in Australia was no fluke, and that he could indeed foot it with the big boys.

One of the more pleasing aspects of the year for me, came towards the end, with Andy Murray’s return to prominence. After having not won anything since his historic title at Wimbledon 2013, he won titles in Shenzen (China), Vienna and Valencia. This run was incredible, and I believe was capped off with his fantastic match against Federer at the Year-end Championships (which he lost). This is an oddity since he obviously lost it. But sometimes you can have great moments in defeat, and in this match I think that Murray had one of those. I think that this performance will bode well for Murray next year.

Federer’s performances in 2014 will not be as significant for the year ahead as what Murray’s late season resurgence will be. Federer’s year was no doubt vastly superior from 2013. But we shouldn’t get swayed into thinking that the Federer of 2005 and 2006 will be back in 2015. That would be ignorant when you consider that he is still a 33-year-old man, which is practically a Grandpa in tennis years. The new players that emerged this year at the absolute top of the game, like Nishikori and Cilic, will benefit from the momentum they gathered. Those two players in particular are both in their mid-20s and will have years of great tennis ahead.

It breaks my heart to say this, but I think that considering the aggressive way he plays, Rafael Nadal may never again ascend to the top ranks of the sport. He perhaps could still win another one or two titles at the French Open, but I think he will only do so if he cuts hard courts from his schedule completely. Often he has complained that hard courts are too hard on player’s knees, and shouldn’t be the most-played surface in the sport. I actually agree with him on this point, but I don’t think that the tennis administration will be making a radical shift in the surfaces any time soon.

So to wrap up, next year I think we will see the continued emergence of player’s from outside The Big Four. We will see Murray win another Slam, perhaps again at Wimbledon. Whether or not Federer will win a Slam will depend a lot on favourable factors forming outside of his control, as they almost did at Wimbledon this year. I am not ruling it out, but I am just saying that it will be unlikely. Djokovic is no doubt a great player and still on top at number 1, but I am going to make a big call here, which is that he won’t win a Slam next year. He will get toppled by the likes of Wawrinka and Cilic (again). In 2016 he will go back to his Slam-winning ways, but not next year. As for any McEnroe and Connors personalities that could emerge next year, I think that Bernard Tomic will make a run at one of the Slams, and will provide a good dose of controversy in that run to add to what will be a great and unpredictable year in the men’s tennis calendar.

Hold On To Your Spoons, French Toast Crunch Returns To Shelves January 2015

By now, you might’ve heard that French Toast Crunch is making its return in 2015, just as Surge soda, the Yumbo, and Pizza Hut’s “Book It!”, among others, did in 2014.

After seeing endless Twitter reactions begging for the return of the iconic ’90s cereal, General Mills announced on Friday that the cereal would return to supermarkets everywhere in January 2015. The cereal was taken off the shelves in 2006, and has since been on an 8-year hiatus.

Huge cereal news… French Toast Crunch is back! #frenchtoastcrunchisback (click the link in our bio)

A photo posted by General Mills (@generalmills) on Dec 12, 2014 at 10:59am PST


“We have been overwhelmed by the consumer conversations, requests and passion for the cereal to come back,” says Waylon Good, marketing manager for Big G in a statement. “We value our fans and are so excited to be able to bring it back for them.”

We’re definitely down to party like it’s 1995 again. And since Twitter was a major reason the French Toast Crunch is coming back, here are the best Twitter reactions to the cereal triumphant return:

Want to read more from HuffPost Taste? Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest and Tumblr.

House Intelligence Chief: CIA Torture Report Will Spur Attacks

WASHINGTON (AP) — Foreign governments and U.S. intelligence agencies are predicting that the release of a Senate report examining the use of torture by the CIA will cause “violence and deaths” abroad, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee said Sunday.

Rep. Mike Rogers, a Michigan Republican, is regularly briefed on intelligence assessments. He told CNN’s “State of the Union” that U.S. intelligence agencies and foreign governments have said privately that the release of the report on CIA interrogations a decade ago will be used by extremists to incite violence that is likely to cost lives. The 480-page report, a summary of a still-classified 6,000 page study, is expected to be made public next week.

A U.S. intelligence official, who was not authorized to be quoted discussing classified intelligence assessments, said Congress had been warned “of the heightened potential that the release could stimulate a violent response.”

On Friday, Secretary of State John Kerry urged the senator in charge of the report to consider the timing of the release, though Obama administration officials say they still support making it public. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat and chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has not responded to reports of the Kerry call, though she told the Los Angeles Times in a story published Sunday that “We have to get this report out.”

A congressional aide noted that the White House has led negotiations to declassify the report since April, and that both the president and his director of national intelligence have endorsed its release. The government has taken steps to beef up security at American posts around the world, said the aide, who was not authorized to be quoted by name and spoke on condition of anonymity.

The report amounts to the first public accounting of the CIA’s use of torture on al-Qaida detainees held in secret facilities in Europe and Asia in the years after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

U.S. officials who have read it say it includes disturbing new details about the CIA’s use of such techniques as sleep deprivation, confinement in small spaces, humiliation and the simulated drowning process known as waterboarding. President Barack Obama has acknowledged, “We tortured some folks.” The report also says the torture failed to produce life-saving intelligence, a conclusion disputed by current and former intelligence officials, including CIA director John Brennan.

Rogers questioned why the report needed to become public, given that the Justice Department investigated and filed no criminal charges.

Feinstein told the Los Angeles Times that the harsh interrogations undermined “societal and constitutional values that we are very proud of. Anybody who reads this is going to never let this happen again.”

In Honduran Schools, Gangs Are In Control

TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras (AP) — In primary and secondary schools of this Central American capital, “hallway” is not just another word for corridor but slang for a gantlet of gangsters who hit up instructors for money on the way to the classroom.

Teachers who don’t pay, don’t teach. Gang prevention police distribute US-funded pamphlets on manners and anger management in about two thirds of the 130 public schools of Tegucigalpa. Gang members, meanwhile, circulate catalogues of their girls offering sexual services for sale.

It can’t exactly be said that street gangs are recruiting in Honduran schools because gangs in Honduras don’t need to recruit. In a country of limited opportunities, more schoolchildren want to join the violent Mara Salvatrucha, 18th Street and other newly formed gangs than the illegal bands can absorb.

What can be said is that, just as they control most of the neighborhoods of Tegucigalpa, street gangs rule over most public schools in the capital. Gangsters are students and students are gangsters, as are some of their parents. The gangs lay claim to buildings with graffiti, and monitor the movements of police who are trying to monitor them. When the government sends in the military to retake a neighborhood and its schools, the ruling gang may lay low for a time, but they can’t stay quiet for long or competitors will move in, setting off a wave of violence.

“The schools are a base of organization for the gangs, and the point through which all children in the neighborhood pass,” said Lt. Col. Santos Nolasco, spokesman for the joint military and police force in charge of security in the country of 8.2 million people.

Gangs rely on kids to do much of their illegal grunt work, knowing that even if they get caught, they won’t face long jail sentences. More than a third of the estimated 5,000 gang members with criminal charges them against in 2010 were under 15 years old, according to the only study that examines age in gangs. This year, police say they have detained more than 400 minors for gang activity, including some as young as 12.

Poorly educated students may have to repeat a grade several times before passing exams, and police say some gangsters intentionally repeat years just to hold onto illegal operations in a school — their means of making a living. As a result, kids between the ages of 11 and 17 may be in the same class.

While most gang violence takes place outside of school, there have been rapes and kidnappings inside, and extortion is rampant. In addition to setting up the occasional gantlet, where a teacher has to cough up pocket money on the spot, gangs demand that educators pay 1,000 lempiras or about $50 a month, more than 10 percent of their salary.

“The extortion takes place through the school director, ” said Liliana Ruiz, the Ministry of Education’s director for Tegucigalpa. “They make an appointment with the director at the mall and he has to arrive with the money. In Honduras, the extortion has to be paid.”

In many schools, the power of the gangs is omnipresent and once a gang takes control of a school, Ruiz said, the teacher has no choice but to get along with the gangsters, or ask to be moved. If a gang grabs a child from a classroom, most teachers know to keep quiet, even if the student is never heard from again.

“The fear is indescribable … because these children are capable of anything,” Ruiz said. “It is a climate of shocking desperation.”

___

Yojana Corrales, a police officer with the capital’s gang prevention unit, stops to speak with neighbors outside of El Sitio school for grades one through nine in northern Tegucigalpa, and immediately draws the attention of gangsters. One pulls up on a motorcycle, another on a bicycle, both carrying two-way radios, and they eavesdrop on her conversation.

“They’re just checking up on what we’re doing,” Corrales explained.

With 15 years on gang details, Corrales is used to the scrutiny.

“We’ll go into a school to hand out manuals and the gang will come in, take one and start reviewing it in front of us. They control what is said to the children,” she said.

The front of the Jose Ramon Montoya Institute in eastern Tegucigalpa is painted with MS-13 graffiti, tags of the Mara Salvatrucha. Until recently, dozens of gangsters controlled the second floor of this primary and secondary school, using it as a base to sell drugs and organize girls into prostitution.

“They begin with a photo in the halls of the school. Afterward, they take her to a mall to buy her clothes. They give her a cellphone and pay for beauty treatments. If the girls want to get out of this, they’re indebted for services rendered and receive threats,” said Corrales.

The attraction for the girls, however, is that a 14-year-old can earn $500 a month in prostitution — more than a police officer’s salary, Corrales says.

Last year, three students became pregnant after they were raped on the second floor of Montoya, according to a teacher. At the start of the new school year, officials called for protection, but when police tried to take back the school, gangsters threw furniture at them from the second floor. Police then took a softer approach — stationing officers at every door to keep a close eye on students. The gangsters retreated.

For the time being, authorities are back in control of Montoya, including the newly repainted second floor.

“We painted the walls inside the school three weeks ago. They’ll come put their tags on them again, and we will paint them again,” said teacher Marcio Pastrana. It is a routine he knows well after 35 years at the school.

“There are more good kids than bad,” Pastrana reflected. “We do everything humanly possible, but the problem isn’t in school, it’s in society.”

___

Only about a third of Honduran school children live with two parents, according to administrators. Many of their parents have headed north to look for work in the United States, while others have been killed or simply left the household. Many students don’t have enough to eat, or work for several hours before and after school to help support their families. They are surrounded by violence in a country with the world’s highest homicide rate.

A majority of Honduran children see a limited future for themselves: work as a laborer, a taxi driver or perhaps as a bus conductor, collecting coins from passengers and earning far less than they might by selling drugs or wielding a gun for the gangs.

Many children leave Honduras out of fear or in search of opportunity in the United States, often long before they finish school. The school districts do not have global dropout numbers, but U.S. Customs and Border Protection says it apprehended 18,244 unaccompanied Honduran children in fiscal year 2014, up dramatically from the previous year, after rumors circulated that they were being allowed to stay in the country.

School administrators say that teachers generally are more afraid of the gangs than the remaining students are, because so many children admire gangsters. In their eyes, the children of gang members are made, and in some neighborhoods, the offspring of two gang members, known as the “pure ones,” are royalty. The gangs look for new members who have something to offer them: beauty, bravery or perhaps an empty house.

“An 11-year-old mentions at school that his grandmother has died and he can get the keys to the house that is empty,” said Corrales. “The gang grabs the house and begins to use it, and that child doesn’t get out of the gang.”

Teachers, administrators and police acknowledge that the government’s efforts to protect schools with military police and gang prevention programs are not yielding measurable results.

After the leader of a drug gang at the Republic of Panama School in the Buenos Aires neighborhood was killed in September, 20 gangsters were detained and their mates warned of reprisals. Thirty military police were deployed to provide protection, said Lt. Col. Nolasco. The result of the arrests, said a group of 11- to 14-year-olds, speaking on condition of anonymity, was more danger as another gang tried to muscle in.

“The situation is more complicated now,” said a student.

Corrales, the gang prevention officer, arrived at the La Hera school in the northern neighborhood by the same name, on a recent afternoon to distribute her prevention handbooks and meet with the kids. Before she even got out of her pick-up truck, however, a group of children climbed into the back and put their hands behind their heads, mimicking detained gang members.

“This is the image of the gang leader,” Corrales said. “The detainee is a somebody in the barrio, and those kids want to be a somebody.”

Democratic Mayors Rally Support For Obama's Immigration Changes

NEW YORK — A group of 20 Democratic mayors will meet on Monday to brainstorm ways of pressing Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform, and to trade information about how to best support President Barack Obama’s executive action softening deportation policy.

Facing Republican gains in Congress that make the passage of comprehensive reform less likely, the local leaders hope to work with advocates and activists across the country to create a groundswell of pressure that will force national leaders to act.

“It’s an exciting moment,” said Nisha Agarwal, commissioner of the New York City Mayor’s Office on Immigrant Affairs, in an interview with The Huffington Post on Sunday. “We’re not throwing in the towel for long-term reform. We’re hoping to come out of tomorrow’s meeting with a plan of action to make it happen.”

The group will meet at Gracie Mansion, the home of New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, who has taken a leadership role in the mayors’ efforts. They plan to identify members of Congress whom they will then lobby to move forward with reform legislation. Down the line, said city officials, the group hopes to create a broad-based coalition of advocates and faith and business leaders to help them press for reform and expand immigrant-friendly policies.

While pressuring elected officials to pass comprehensive reform remains the group’s long-term goal, the mayors will also spend much of their time figuring out ways to expand immigrant-friendly policies passed at the local level, and facilitate enrollment in deferred action programs that protect millions of undocumented immigrants with strong ties to the U.S. from deportation.

That last part might be a tough sell for many Republicans. Obama’s decision last month to shield some 4.4 million undocumented immigrants from deportation and offer them work permits has been roundly condemned as an overreach of executive power by Republican members of Congress. A group of 17 states, later joined by Arizona and Florida, filed a lawsuit last week to overturn the president’s action.

But Agarwal dismissed the idea that the group of local leaders might be criticized for failing to include Republicans.

“This coalition is open to everyone,” Agarwal told HuffPost. “But the vision here is that we support what the president has done in terms of executive action, and we want to help implement that.”

In the absence of congressional action on immigration, some state governments have taken restrictive measures of their own. Since 2010, many states, including Arizona, Alabama and Georgia, have passed a series of bills cracking down on illegal immigration by requiring local police forces to inquire into the immigration status of the people they stop, among other provisions. The courts have suspended or overturned some of the most contentious parts of those laws.

Municipal governments have also taken steps to make life harder for undocumented immigrants. The city of Hazelton, Pennsylvania, and the Dallas suburb Farmers Branch, Texas, for example, passed ordinances — later overturned in court — that barred undocumented immigrants from renting housing.

Other cities, however, have responded to federal inaction on immigration with progressive legislation aimed at creating a more hospitable environment for undocumented immigrants.

In 2012, Los Angeles created a citywide identification card for undocumented immigrants that can double as a debit card for migrants without bank accounts. The California legislature followed up this year by passing a bill allowing undocumented immigrants to apply for driver’s licenses.

In legislation supported by de Blasio and spearheaded by Melissa Mark-Viverito, speaker of the New York City Council, the city earlier this year passed the country’s largest municipal ID program for undocumented immigrants, as well as an initiative to help pay for legal aid for unaccompanied minors who crossed illegally into the U.S. from Central America and were later relocated to New York.

Agarwal said the new coalition was partly inspired by the Obama administration’s recent decision to scrap Secure Communities, a data-sharing program piloted by former President George W. Bush in 2008.

Immigrants’ rights groups reviled Secure Communities, which helped federal immigration authorities identify undocumented immigrants arrested for other reasons by local law enforcement. Under the program, Immigration and Customs Enforcement would send a request for local authorities to detain suspected undocumented immigrants on behalf of ICE for 48 hours — though in practice, immigrants were often held for much longer periods.

After a federal court ruling this year made it clear that such requests were optional, scores of jurisdictions across the country, along with the state government of California, pushed back against the program, adopting policies of disregarding most federal requests to hold undocumented immigrants.

In light of the growing opposition to Secure Communities, Obama dismantled the program last month ahead of his announcement of the changes to deportation policy.

“The vision here is that we’ve got to act,” Agarwal said. “We’ve seen how cities can lead the force for change, and that pushes up to the federal level.”

The Anti-Bangs PSA Everyone Thinking About Making The Chop Needs To See

Is there someone in your life whose forehead has been affected?

Every year, thousands of people decide it would be “really neat” or “totally cute” to get bangs. They think, “I’ll look just like Zooey Deschanel!” And with no one around to guide them, or an overly-optimistic friend at their side, the results can be disastrous.

Take time to watch this PSA by the New York sketch comedy team Dolly, and if you or anyone you know are considering bangs, please call 1-800-NO2BANGS.

FratPAC Pushes University Of Virginia To End Punishment Of Greek Life

CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. (AP) — The University of Virginia should lift its suspension of fraternity and sorority activities now that Rolling Stone has acknowledged mistakes in its reporting of an alleged gang rape on campus, three organizations said in a statement.

The Fraternity and Sorority Political Action Committee, the National Panhellenic Conference and the North-American Interfraternity Conference also said the university should apologize for a “rush to judgment” that damaged the reputation of Greek organizations and students.

University President Teresa A. Sullivan suspended Greek activities until Jan. 9 after Rolling Stone published an article last month describing an alleged gang rape at the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity house. In their statement Sunday, the three national Greek organizations said the decision was made before an investigation into the story’s allegations was completed.

“We believe universities must demonstrate more respect for the fundamental rights to due process and freedom of association for students and student organizations when allegations of misconduct are lodged,” they said. “A rush to judgment on campus all too often turns out to be wrong, especially when applied at the organizational level.”

University spokesmen did not immediately return telephone and email messages to The Associated Press on Monday.

The statement came the same day that Rolling Stone modified its earlier apology to emphasize that the mistakes were the magazine’s fault, not the alleged victim’s. Friday’s original note to readers said of Jackie, the alleged victim who was the main source for the story: “Our trust in her was misplaced.” The updated note removes that line, which struck some critics as blaming the victim.

The magazine said it shouldn’t have agreed to Jackie’s request not to contact the alleged assailants to get their side of the story, out of sensitivity to her. “These mistakes are on Rolling Stone, not on Jackie,” wrote the magazine’s managing editor, Will Dana. “We apologize to anyone who was affected by the story and we will continue to investigate the events of that evening.”

The Rolling Stone article rocked a campus still reeling from the disappearance and death of 18-year-old sophomore Hannah Graham. It portrayed a culture of sexual violence at U.Va., one of the nation’s leading public universities, and an administration response that put protecting the school’s image ahead of seeking justice for sex crimes.

Phi Kappa Psi has denied the assault and said it didn’t host an event on the night Jackie alleged she was raped. Dana said in his updated note that Jackie is now unsure that the man who allegedly lured her into a room to be raped by seven men was a member of Phi Kappa Psi, and that other discrepancies in her account have emerged. Jackie told the Washington Post she stood by her story.

Some advocates for rape victims have expressed concern that the magazine’s backpedaling could undermine efforts to combat campus sexual assaults. The U.Va. Inter-Fraternity Council said that should not be allowed to happen.

“Sexual assault is a problem across college campuses, and we remain committed to being leaders in the campaign for long-term change,” the council, which represents U.Va.’s 31 fraternities, said in a statement.

Cash Register Politics Destroys Democracy

“The mid-term elections are over. After spending hundreds of millions of business dollars, the Republicans now control the Senate and hold on to the House of Representatives. It is amazing that the Democrats did not do worse.” If those sentences ring familiar, it’s because I wrote them in 2002 in response to that year’s midterm elections, although they could easily apply today.

Now several weeks removed from the 2014 elections, the news cycle has moved on to other matters, but the fallout remains to affect the lives and livelihoods of millions of Americans. Unless Americans start to get serious about their elections, we may as well repeat the same sentiments in another twelve years with an even greater price tag attached.

After spending even more hundreds of millions of campaign dollars, the craven, corporatist Republicans once again control Congress. Of course, the Democrats dialed for many of the same commercial dollars and spent their own hundreds of millions in campaign advertising, all while spectacularly failing to make a better case about the direction of our country to the voters than the worst Republican Party in history.

Note another 2002 reaction of mine:

“…the Democrats were not highlighting the desperate need for raising the federal minimum wage (now about a third less in purchasing power than it was in 1968!)”

Once again, twelve years later in 2014, Democrats dropped the ball on an issue that polls show 80% of Americans agree upon. I also wrote about the Democrats failing to go after Republicans on consumer protection issues like food safety and clean air and water, which we all need regardless of political alignment.

In light of history repeating itself so completely, one must ask where did all these millions of dollars go if, twelve years later, the very same mistakes, blunders and oversights are being made?

The answer is: huge media buys, endless mailings both paper and electronic, and incessant telephone calls, many recorded, to registered voters. One firm estimated that $2.6 billion was spent just on TV advertising in the 2014 midterms. Very few, if any, of these political ads are informative to voters–in fact, most people find them enormously irritating, specifically in swing states where they run constant until Election Day. Despite the overload of political noise on the airwaves, the issues that would really strike a difference are disturbingly ignored.

Just think about all the good those millions could have done were they focused on public needs such as repairing roads and infrastructure, or easing student loan burdens, or refurbishing water systems, schools and libraries―it is enough to get anyone with a deep interest in the preservation and improvement of their own local community riled up. The amount of money and resources poured into these showy and substance-lacking elections is appalling.

And where is all this money coming from? See author Darrell West’s recent book Billionaires: Reflections on the Upper Crust (Brookings Institution Press, 2014) which takes a fascinating look at the politically-active super-rich and how they have, in so many ways, seized enormous amounts of influence with the “wealthification” of politics in our country (and around the world.)

It begs the question―How much should an individual vote cost? How much is too much? According to a recent Brookings report the 2014 Alaska Senate race cost $120.59 per voter. The next highest per voter expenditure is New Hampshire, at $50 per voter–despite being considerably less, it’s still an extraordinary amount spent for a single vote. (Iowa is next at $39.11, followed by Colorado at $27.40. See the rest of the top ten at the link above)

Another stunning example from Brookings is the North Carolina Senate race. This contest between Kay Hagan and Thom Tillis reportedly cost $111,000,000. It’s being called the most expensive Senate race in U.S. history (not accounting for inflation.) More than 100,000 ads were run in that single state. Similarly, $97,100,000 was spent in Colorado, $88,000,000 in Iowa and so on.

Astronomical election spending should come as no surprise to avid Congress watchers. In post-Citizens United and McCutcheon Supreme Court decisions America, politicians from both major parties go into their meetings talking about raising money and walk out talking about raising money. Where governance was once a matter of more importance to those we sent to represent us in Congress, campaign cash―and how to accumulate truckloads of it―has instead become the primary concern to candidates.

If there was any doubt, newly-minted Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell once called the signing of the McCain-Feingold bill which imposed some limits on corporate campaign spending “the worst day of his political life.” On the Democratic side, Rep. Jared Huffman (D-CA) responded to my call for Nancy Pelosi to step down as House minority leader by arguing that she “personally raised over $100 million for the [House Democratic] caucus. There’s no one else on Earth who could do that,” as if this was the principle measure of her leadership.

And it’s only going to get worse―the SuperPACs are already gearing up for 2016. Even Warren Buffett, who has been quite critical of SuperPACS, recently gave the maximum donation allowed to a “Ready for Hillary” group.

Here’s some more observations from 2002 to once again consider, still relevant today:

“Lessons for the future? Don’t give your major political opponents a free ride between and before elections. Challenge the corporate takeover of elections, including the sudden surge of political television advertising paid directly by industries like the big price-gouging drug companies. And get down to the neighborhood level with visible stands for the people.

Otherwise the Democrats will become even better at electing very bad Republicans.”

If you are tired of rinse-and-repeat electoral politics and are interested in taking action, consider signing Public Citizen’s petition for a Constitutional Amendment to overturn the U.S. Supreme Court’s McCutcheon v. FEC and Citizens United v. FEC rulings. You will be emailed regular updates on the campaign and other ways to fight back against the overflow of money in politics.

First the petitions, then the mass, peaceful street protests.

(More information on Public Citizen’s work on money in politics is available here.)