After Student Killed By Bear, Focus Turns To New Jersey Hunt

NEWARK, N.J. (AP) — Three months after a Rutgers University student was mauled to death by a bear, the state’s final of five scheduled bear hunts is set for this week as state wildlife officials and activists disagree over whether the hunts are needed to control the bruin population or are an inhumane practice that doesn’t address public safety.

While the overall numbers of bears in the state has decreased since the state instituted the hunt in 2010, some point to Darsh Patel’s death as evidence that there is too much focus on killing the animals and not enough on educating the public about how to handle interactions with them. “The fact that we had a person killed despite having a hunt shows it is not working,” said Jeff Tittel, director of the Sierra Club in New Jersey.

Patel was hiking in the Apshawa Preserve with four friends when they noticed a 300-pound black bear following them. The group scattered, and Patel’s friends, who were not injured, called police when they realized he was missing.

Tittel said non-lethal methods such as aversion therapy to make bears afraid of people and teaching people how to bear-proof houses and yards are effective. He also stressed the need for warning signs: there were no signs notifying hikers that bears reside in the area of the Apshawa Preserve or lists of do’s and don’ts about bear confrontations. Photos released by police show Patel took pictures of the bear with his cellphone before being attacked.

About 1,600 bears have been killed in the last four hunts, according to the state Department of Environmental Protection. In 2010, there were 3,400 bears living north of Interstate 80, roughly in the upper one-eighth of the state, according to a state Fish and Game Council report that supported the resumption of the bear hunt, in part to ensure public safety. The DEP estimates there are about 2,500 bears in that area now.

Only 251 bears were killed last year, a nearly 60 percent drop from the 592 killed in 2010. Freezing rain and bad weather hampered hunters on the first day of the hunt.

Kelcey Burguess, principal biologist and leader of the Division of Fish and Wildlife’s black bear project, said the DEP may recommend holding future hunts earlier in the fall to avoid potentially disruptive weather, and extending the length of the hunt.

“As a general rule we have slowed the population, but that doesn’t mean we are done,” he said. “We need to make sure we’re managing the population on more of a statewide level. The hunt is effective, but it isn’t effective as it could be.”

The number of reports of aggressive bears has dropped, but with some caveats.

Reports of Category 1 bears, defined as bruins that are aggressive and a danger to humans or livestock, fell from 235 in 2010 to 129 in 2013. While home entries and attempted entries fell from 90 in 2010 to 33 last year, they have risen to 44 through late November. In addition, reports of bears killing livestock rose from 21 to 35 between 2012 and 2013.

That could bolster Burguess’ contention that while the bear population is falling in the more heavily forested areas in western and northwestern New Jersey, bears may be proliferating in areas where hunting is prohibited or restricted, such as in some state parks or nature conservancies that border residential areas.

The Fish and Game Council report in 2010 concluded that efforts to educate people about bear-proofing their garbage systems had been effective, as inspections of 4,600 residential properties had found 98 percent in compliance with bear management guidelines. It noted, though, that “the expense of bear-resistant garbage cans and commercial containers has hampered their widespread use.”

Bears have been seen in all 21 New Jersey counties, according to the DEP.

The hunts draw animal rights protesters, who have called for the state to ban allowing hunters from baiting bears.

Angi Metler, executive director of the Animal Protection League of New Jersey, said at a statehouse rally Thursday that baiting is inhumane and counterproductive because it changes the animals’ natural foraging patterns and attracts them to other human food supplies.

She and others at the rally called on lawmakers to support a bill that would ban baiting and require other “bear smart” measures, such as bear-proof trash containers and bans on birdseed in areas populated by bears.

Adam Grant And Sheryl Sandberg On Discrimination At Work – NYTimes.com

A FATHER and his son are in a car accident. The father is killed and the son is seriously injured. The son is taken to the hospital where the surgeon says, “I cannot operate, because this boy is my son.”

Dog Chases Away Her Friend's Bad Dream With A Good Ol' Snuggle Sesh

A friend in need is a friend indeed.

While taking a nap, YouTuber Brooke Conti’s dog Jackson apparently started having a bad dream and began flailing about in his sleep.

But luckily for the pooch, his canine pal Laika was close at hand and quickly leaped into action to comfort her dear friend.

Nightmares are certainly much less scary when you’ve got a BFF to snuggle up with!

(Watch the adorableness unfold in the video above.)

James Franco And Seth Rogen Address Sony Hack In 'SNL' Monologue

James Franco got a little help while hosting “Saturday Night Live” when his “The Interview” co-star and close friend Seth Rogen crashed Franco’s opening monologue to address the recent Sony hack.

In the sketch, the pair said that because of the leak, their most embarassing private photos had been accessed. See the hilarious pictures below, and expect more nudity than in the “Bound 3” video:

After Sony Pictures suffered a major security breach at the hands of online hackers, some believed that North Korea was responsible for the hack, suspecting that it was in retaliation of Rogen and Franco’s upcoming comedy, “The Interview.” The film, made by Sony, features Rogen and Franco as two journalists who are enlisted by the CIA to assassinate North Korean leader Kim-Jong-Un. North Korea has denied responsibility for the hack, but called it a “righteous deed”.

I on Beauty: Chapter 11 – Six Dermatological Breakthroughs to Defy Age: Part II

2014-12-07-HPCh11Pic.jpg
Photo from the collection of Irene Michaels.

In the first part of this piece, I discussed a popular procedure, fractional CO2 laser skin resurfacing, as well as revolutionary anti-aging ingredients Vitamin A, Helioplex, and Mexoryl SX. I now continue with three additional advancements in skincare science.

Advanced Wrinkle-filling Injections

Dependent on our natural skin cycle, creams and serums generally require several weeks of continuous use before significant results are noticed. Wrinkle injections, however, provide instant results by adding volume to skin exactly and only where desired. They are also much more natural looking and far less painful than surgery, with side effects generally limited to mild, temporary swelling or irritation at the injection site.

Perlane, Juvéderm, and Radiesse have emerged onto the market and generated great excitement among customers. Those who have enjoyed the effects of the widely popular filler Restalyn may benefit most from Perlane, a “thicker” version of the filler. Juvéderm has gained notoriety because it not only acts as an effective filler but even contains hyaluronic acid, which has been shown to generate collagen production and disrupt its break-down.

The price of injections usually ranges from $500 to $1000 per syringe, and results last about a year or longer, making this a great option for those unafraid of needles and with money to spend.

Antioxidants

Consuming a diet rich in antioxidants is recommended for good health, but we now know that topically applied antioxidants are also important for protecting skin from the damaging free-radicals to which we’re constantly bombarded through exposure to air pollution or sunrays. Essentially, these free-radicals are unstable molecules that “steal” electrons from the structures that make up a healthy skin cell. This impairs the cells’ functions and slows down regeneration. Antioxidants are highly attractive to these free-radicals and essentially intercept them before they damage our cells.

While products containing antioxidants CoQ10 and vitamins C and E have been on the market for a while, discovery of the coffee berry has been particularly exciting to researchers. Often found near the equator, this fruit thrives in conditions of intense sun exposure. Many studies have found that the potency of antioxidants from this fruit is much greater than that of other antioxidants, which means greater protection for us. The best-performing cosmeceuticals seem to combine several complementary antioxidants for extra protection.

Clinique’s Continuous Rescue Antioxidant Moisturizer is a customer favorite, costing $39.50 for 1.7 ounces. For the same quantity of product, you can also try Neutrogena’s Antioxidant Age Reverse Day Lotion or Night Cream for only $17.99.

Peptides

For biologists, peptide is a very nonspecific word that refers to the amino-acid chains that make up protein. In cosmetics, peptides refer to a select few of these amino-acid chains. Palmitoyl peptapeptide-3, known commercially as Matrixyl, is one such peptide. It has actually been shown to stimulate collagen production in the skin. As you already know, collagen gives our skin firmness, but it breaks down over time. As we age, our skin loses the ability to recognize when collagen needs to be replaced. Matrixyl signals our cells to restart collagen production, thus firming our skin over time.

While Matrixyl is the most widely used peptide in skincare, there are others that work to boost collagen production or to address other skin concerns. Argireline, for instance, is a wrinkle-relaxing peptide that affects the face in a manner similar to Botox. This peptide blocks neurotransmitters that signal muscle contraction–but without the toxicity of the Botox agent. As research on Argireline continues, we can hope that an even better delivery system will increase efficacy of the peptide and provide a safer, equally effective substitute for Botox.

Most skincare companies have now incorporated peptide containing creams or serums into their product lines. Best-sellers include Olay Regenerist Micro-Sculpting Cream, retailing at $29.99 for 1.7 ounces and Osmotics Blue Copper 5 Face Lifting Serum at $75 per ounce.

Ultimately, each of us must individually consider the cost, time, and relative benefits of each skincare treatment or regimen before determining what is best for ourselves. I have seen friends experience great results with fractional CO2 laser skin resurfacing while others opt for new, advanced topical creams, not being able to accommodate the downtime associated with a laser procedure. In the end, a trusted, board-certified dermatologist can be a valuable liaison to the world of skincare science. Hopefully this article has provided helpful suggestions that you can discuss with yours.

Have a Happy & Healthy Holiday Season & New Year!

Follow Irene on Facebook, Twitter, and IOnTheScene.com!

This Aquarium Is in an Old TV, Looks Like Seinfeld’s Apartment

Remember those old TVs that were actual pieces of furniture in their own right? Well, no one is using those TVs anymore, so they are being sold for cheap since everyone has flat screens today. Matt Davidson got a hold of one of these old TVs and decided to do something creative with it.

seinfeld_aquariumzoom in

He used the old TV cabinet to enclose an aquarium, but that’s not all. If you are going to have a TV aquarium, it might as well look like it has something playing on the screen. So Matt made it exactly like Jerry Seinfeld’s apartment from the classic TV show Seinfeld!

Of course, the fish are named Jerry, George, Elaine, Kramer, and Newman. Newman. Apparently it only took a few hours of work, but he spread it out over a period of a couple of years. If you want to make one, you can see a step-by-step guide at Awesomeness Projects. It’s an aquarium about nothing.

[via Neatorama]

PS4 20th Anniversary Edition preorders begin, sell out in minutes

PS4 20th Anniversary Edition preorders begin, sell out in minutesIt was less than a week ago that Sony announced its special edition 20th Anniversary-themed PlayStation 4 console, featuring a gray paint job to match the original PlayStation system and limited to only 12,300 units worldwide. All Sony said was that preorders would start on December 6th in the U.S., but they didn’t detail how or where reservations could be … Continue reading

What It Takes to Build a Snake-Proof Suit

What It Takes to Build a Snake-Proof Suit

Later tonight, you’ll be able to watch a man attempt to become a 25-foot, giant green anaconda’s dinner—willingly. And to make sure our human snake snack makes it out alive, scientists spent months designing, testing, and building one incontrovertibly snake-proof suit. Air mask, chainmail, pig’s blood and all.

Read more…



After Dark: NYC Nightlife Today And Days Past

This is the final installment in HuffPost Gay Voices Associate Editor James Nichols‘ 30-part series “After Dark: NYC Nightlife Today And Days Past” that examines the state of New York nightlife in the modern day, as well as the development and production of nightlife over the past several decades. Each featured individual in this series currently serves as a prominent person in the New York nightlife community or has made important contributions in the past that have sustained long-lasting impacts.

HuffPost Gay Voices believes that it is important and valuable to elevate the work, both today and in the past, of those engaged in the New York nightlife community, especially in an age where queer history seems to be increasingly forgotten. Nightlife not only creates spaces for queers and other marginalized groups to be artistically and authentically celebrated, but the work of those involved in nightlife creates and shapes the future of our culture as a whole. Visit Gay Voices regularly to learn not only about individuals currently making an impact in nightlife, but those whose legacy has previously contributed to the ways we understand queerness, art, identity and human experience today.

Over the past six months, HuffPost Gay Voices Associate Editor James Nichols sought to provide a platform for the spectrum of performers, designers, promoters and artists engaged — either currently or historically — with what we collectively refer to as “nightlife” in New York City.

In a time where queer culture is increasingly both folded into the mainstream and appropriated by society at large, queer nightlife in the urban mecca of New York City serves a crucially important function. Not only do nightlife spaces act as central meeting points for creatives to showcase their work and meet like-minded individuals, but they also serves as as a preservation of queerness in this age of gay marriage and homonormativity.

(function(){var src_url=”http://embed.live.huffingtonpost.com/HPLEmbedPlayer/?segmentId=545a75ee78c90a30ce000146&autoPlay=false&onVideoDataLoaded=HPTrack.Vid.DL&onTimeUpdate=HPTrack.Vid.TC”;if (typeof(commercial_video) == “object”) {src_url += “&siteSection=”+commercial_video.site_and_category;if (commercial_video.package) {src_url += “&sponsorship=”+commercial_video.package;}}var iframe = document.querySelector(“.js-hplive-frame”);iframe.src = src_url;iframe.className=””;})();

Nightlife also acts as a major source of cultural production, both within the context of the queer community and the fabric of our society as a whole.

For all of these reasons, “After Dark” was born as a platform for artists to discuss and self-reflect on the current state of nightlife and the foundational role it plays — or played — in the formation of their work and identity.

At a time where the exponential growth of technology provides a constant excess and influx of information, many people engaged with the queer community oftentimes seem to have little awareness surrounding the history of our collective struggle for rights and citizenry. For this reason, “After Dark” aimed not only to elevate the work of those currently engaged in the NYC nightlife community, but also historic and legendary figures whose work has gone on to shape queer culture on a large scale.

In an effort to step back from the singular installments of “After Dark” and formulate a larger perspective surrounding this narrative — as well as the future of nightlife in New York City — we reached out to each individual featured in this series to hear their thoughts on one final question:

“As New York City continues to change, especially with some arguing that the city increasingly functions to primarily serve the wealthy and elite, what do you see as the role and future of nightlife for queer artists and performers in this new vision of NYC?”

Much like the city that it exists in, nightlife in New York City encapsulates a constantly evolving narrative. While the reality of existing in an urban mecca that seems to increasingly function to serve the needs of the elite certainly presents its own set of challenges, queer artists have historically continued to thrive and create in the face of institutionalized oppression.

In fact, few things hold as much political and social weight as living openly and authentically in the face of a world that has historically tried to “correct” or kill you.

As technology and the economic realities of New York City in the 21st century continue to augment nightlife, the value of the work coming out of these queer spaces will no doubt be the one constant within this narrative.

Our culture at large will continue to be shaped and informed in the future by the individuals navigating the NYC nightlife community — a queer world that operate entirely within the hours After Dark.

The American Stories That Cannot Be Untold

The scar over my grandfather’s left eye tells a story, and it is this: In 1930, my maternal grandparents Prisciliano and Francisca Sánchez were married in Indiana Harbor, Indiana (pictured above). Though technically across the state line, Indiana Harbor is part of Chicago’s sprawling metropolitan empire, not too far from downtown’s picture postcard shoreline.

My grandparents lived in a neighborhood that was predominantly Mexican: They rented a small apartment and began buying pieces of furniture to outfit their new life. They had their wedding photo framed. A year later, Francisca gave birth to their first child, a girl they named María de la Luz. (Mary of the Light, if English leant itself to such lyrically faith-filled names.)

In 1932, Francisca became pregnant with their second child, who would be a son. Also in 1932, white cops stopped Prisciliano and almost beat him to death: Another punch, maybe another kick or two, and my grandmother would have been a widow on the eve of her thirtieth birthday.

This is the story that Prisciliano’s friends, who carried him home to the little apartment, told Francisca, and which she in turn told her children: The cops often harassed Mexican men, less-than-welcoming to the new immigrants on the block. Many of the police were also Catholic, according to Francisca, but in 1930s Chicago, that meant nothing. The old fairy tales of Irish American soldiers deserting U.S. forces during the 1846-48 War, and joining their fellow Catholics on the Mexican side, were just that – fables of a very distant past.

The police were white, American white, at least in their own minds. My grandparents, on the other hand, possessed only the most fragile, tenuous claims to any Europeanness. Between them, three of their four parents were, in old terms, criollos: Mexicans of Spanish ancestry. In the United States, though, that term was meaningless, as weightless as old alliances recorded in history books; even my grandparents themselves never would have used the word.

Prisciliano and Francisca were not white in this country, and that was that. Thus the cops would stop Mexican men like my grandfather, mocking their accents, belittling their darker skins, and they would ask the men for their names. In an effort to defuse the situation, many Mexicanos would adopt Irish surnames right on the spot. “My name is Juan O’Reilly.” “Manuel O’Brien.” “My name, it’s Felipe O’Malley, señor.” O’Reilly, O’Malley, O’Something — whatever names they had heard and knew.

No one believed any of this, according to my grandfather’s friends. It was a charade for the moment, an imposed deference to the greater power of the men with badges — an obeisance to the greater social legitimacy of the police and the institution that paid them. Everyone knew it was a farce, and everyone joined in. They were supposed to, at least.

Prisciliano, however, wore his national pride with the same swagger with which he dressed himself in tailored suits and carefully chosen fedoras. He’d come to the United States, to Chicago, almost ten years earlier during Mexico’s endlessly brutal revolution. In his retelling, the flight from his homeland was imagined and then acted upon in less than a day. In the middle of the war — when it seemed to have gone on so long already, and yet still had so long to go — federal forces came to my grandfather’s home town, and shot two of his brothers dead. The boys “failed to volunteer” to join the federalistas, and thus they died.

Later that night, before his siblings were even buried, my grandfather kissed his mother goodbye, and began the two thousand mile journey from Encarnación de Díaz, in the southern state of Jalisco, to Chicago. Leave quickly, and live another day. Two thousand miles: Through war zones, and then through a strange country with a language he didn’t then know. And yet he made it. If he could survive that, he could survive anything, right? So when the cops stopped my grandfather and his friends that night in 1932, my grandfather did not join in the charade. He spoke his name clearly and slowly: Prisciliano Sánchez Olmedo. He held his head high. And then the first cop hit him.

Francisca said that she thought my grandfather would die that night. The blood obscured the features of the man she loved, and the blood was surrounded by noise — his moans, his friends’ frantic debate over what to do first, her toddler daughter beginning to cry. Someone went for a doctor, and someone else went for Francisca’s sister and brother-in-law who lived nearby. A neighbor came and picked up baby Luz, trying to rock her and comfort her. Another made my grandmother tea; when my great-aunt arrived, she hovered over her younger, pregnant, and terrified sister. My great-aunt was scared too; everyone was.

Fear was the strongest thing in the room, pulling at and controlling everything and everyone. The doctor came. My grandfather was in bed for days, not working. Friends came, brought food, watched the baby; my great-aunt never left her sister’s side. Eventually my grandfather got better. Even with healing injuries, he was still young and strong, and of course, he was cheap immigrant labor, so he got another job quickly. The Great Depression, though, was settling in for a long stay, and the fear that had entered the apartment with my grandfather’s limp body never left, not for Francisca. Times were hard, and people became hard with them. My grandparents’ second baby had come, and Francisca worried about her husband constantly. What if it happened again? What if they were not “lucky” this time?

My grandparents gave their notice, packed the furniture and the wedding photo, and bought train tickets. They did not go to Jalisco, but to Coahuila, Francisca’s home state in the north of the country. There they found a small house near that of her parents, on a street where everyone — Riveras, Adáns, Martinezes, Gómezes – was related in some way.

When they were older — María de la Luz, José, and then later, Antonieta and Conchita — Francisca told her children about how the racist police had nearly killed their father. How they had ruined our life in Chicago. How they threatened other men, and thus other women and other children, every single day. In Coahuila, though, everyone liked her husband, and her, and her children. No one made fun of their accents, their skin, their food, their Virgin Mary, their anything. Aunts and uncles, cousins, in-laws, and the large soft web of familia were everywhere. No threats, and no fear.

This is the story that Francisca told her children, and that they told me. Prisciliano did not tell the story of his beating at the hands of white cops. The stories that he did tell — to me, his only granddaughter — were actually stories of love. Chicago was the place where his escape led him: A huge expanse of lights and life, of refuge from war. In Chicago he got good jobs, and could buy the nice clothes he took so much pleasure in wearing. Chicago was where he met the most beautiful woman in the world, the norteña with reddish-brown hair whose picture he kept tucked into his Bible. We found it there when he died, protected in a small plastic sleeve amongst the pages of the Psalms. (“Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life, and I shall dwell in the house of the Lord forever.”)

My grandfather only told me how much he loved Chicago — and Jalisco, and mariachi, and baseball, and a shot of tequila in his morning coffee “to start up my heart.” He loved growing tomatoes and peppers in the backyard; he loved the pale sunsets of the Midwest in winter. He loved his wife, and his children, and me. And I, in turn, adored him — adore him still, in his grave.

There was one part of the story, though, that told itself despite him: The scar above his left eye. A small rift of skin, joined eventually by wrinkles and yet, not quite of them. I knew that scar. And so his reticence was of no matter: When my mother, and my aunts, and my uncle, told me the story of his beating, I recognized it. I knew it as well as I knew his kind and loving face.

***

I have been thinking of these stories, the one uttered and the one worn in my grandfather’s skin, ever since Michael Brown’s death in Ferguson, Missouri on August 9th.

I actually think of these stories frequently: I think of them every time I hear of a black man or a Latino man being killed by police. I think of related stories over the years from friends, colleagues, and students I have taught: men being stopped, questioned, followed, treated with disdain and disrespect, suspicion, and always, with violence looming, instantly there, filling up a car, a street, a campus, materialized as if plucked from the air. Mostly men, though not always.

And I think, well, it happened to my grandfather. It happened to Sara’s brother, and my student Jaime, and my mom’s friend Rudy, and on and on and on. I mean, we’re fucking Latino in the United States — what are the chances I wouldn’t know stories of our men, and of our black neighbors, friends, lovers, coworkers, fellow citizens, being harassed by police? Do I really have to say that is almost always white police? (I am trying to think, as I write this, if any of the stories I know are not about white police, and I am coming up empty.)

The point of this is not to provide hard data — the numbers and facts that are volleyed back and forth, like so much ammunition, in every form of media we have. The data are meaningless, and they do not move us; activists and politicians, lobbyists and prosecutors, friends about to unfriend each other and family about to sit down to very uncomfortable dinners, scream numbers at each other every day, and nothing changes.

What I care about most is story: It is stories that crawl inside our hearts, lodge themselves in our consciences, make themselves comfortable and at home in our memories. How could I ever forget that scar on my grandfather’s face? Can I forget how it felt to be held with such love, to be smiled at as if I were, in fact, “una princesa” just like he said? The moment when I learned why that scar was there is just as permanently settled in my mind as my grandfather’s love is settled in my heart.

Stories like these cannot be untold and they cannot be undone. More constant than law, than nation, than theories such as “we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,” stories put down roots, they live and persevere. They survive.

Thus, when I hear of black and Latino men being stopped, being searched, being harassed, being beaten, being shot, being killed, I never think, well, this has nothing to do with race. Laughable; contemptuously laughable. The very idea that somehow, of all areas of life, this is the one where race does not enter, makes me shake with anger.

It’s always about race. Every dawn I have lived and every story that has come with that dawn has taught me this. But I do not expect to convince anyone with this telling of my own. I write it down, in part, because I am thinking of the stories that Michael Brown’s family will now tell. I have seen the pain etched into his mother’s face, and I recognize it. I’ve heard the anger in his father’s voice, and that, too, is as familiar as my own mother’s tones. I believe them, I believe their son was murdered, and I believe our “justice system” failed them. I believe it as instinctively as I believe that right now, I am typing, reading, correcting, breathing, telling. So many stories: Mike Brown’s, and Eric Garner’s, and Tamir Rice’s, Oscar Grant’s, John Crawford’s… but none of them as “lucky” as my family. All of their stories take the place of their lives.

Both Prisciliano and Francisca are dead. So are two of their children. But I have inherited their stories, the ones they told, and the ones they wore written on their faces. So now these are my stories, and I pass them on. Right now, I tell them to you. Make of them what you will — I tell them nonetheless.