atHandTuner Is A Guitar Tuner For Your Android Wear Device

If you play the guitar then chances are that every now and then you will have to whip out a tuner as guitars do go out of tune occasionally. Portable tuners and tuning apps have been around for a while now, but if you’re the proud owner of an Android Wear smartwatch, then perhaps atHandTuner could be of interest to you.

What makes atHandTuner different from the plethora of tuner apps available is the fact that it can be downloaded and installed on an Android Wear device. This means that essentially you would have a tuner with you on your wrist wherever you go. This might come in handy when your smartphone runs out of battery or in those instances where you find yourself in need of a tuner.

So how does atHandTuner fare compared to an actual tuner? For those who might be worried that it might not be as accurate as regular tuners, it certainly doesn’t seem to be the case. Cameron Summerson over at Android Police has taken the tuner out for a spin and based on his findings, it seems that atHandTuner is just as accurate as a regular tuner.

It also comes with a “clip on” mode that allows you to strap your watch to the headstock of the guitar and tune your guitar that way too, which could come in handy for those who prefer headstock tuners. The app is priced at $1.45 and if you’d like to get your hands on it, head on over to the Google Play Store for the download.

atHandTuner Is A Guitar Tuner For Your Android Wear Device , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

New Laws In China Could Force Tech Companies To Install Backdoors

china-internetRemember how upset some people got when they learnt that the bodies representing the US government had allegedly required companies to include backdoors to their hardware and software for security purposes? Well prepare to get upset again because it seems that over in China, a new law that was approved at the end of last year is basically asking for those same provisions, but we suppose at least with China they are pretty open about it.

According to a report from The New York Times, companies in China who are involved with Chinese banks and are selling computer equipment to them are now required to turn over their secret source code, submit themselves to invasive audits, and as a building backdoors to their hardware and software. This is based on a copy of the rules that were obtained by foreign tech companies operating in the country.

The goal, according to the Chinese government, is to help strengthen cybersecurity in critical Chinese industries, so we guess banks do make sense. Unfortunately this is not sitting well with companies as it basically compromises their intellectual property – imagine if the codes for a piece of proprietary software is leaked, what edge does the company have now?

Some have speculated that this move is to help give local business an edge. According to Matthew Cheung, a researcher at Gartner, “I think they’re obviously targeting foreign vendors that are operating in China. They are promoting the local technologies so that local providers who have the capabilities to provide systems to these enterprises can get more market share.”

To that extent, foreign business groups have put together a letter sent to the top-level Communist Party committee on cybersecurity, asking for urgent discussion and dialogue to hopefully arrive at some kind of compromise, but in the meantime this definitely does not bode well for these companies.

New Laws In China Could Force Tech Companies To Install Backdoors , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Here's what Sony's PlayStation Vue TV service is like in real life

When Sony unveiled its PlayStation Vue streaming service, it painted a rosy picture of what you’ll get: tons of channels! You’ll never look at TV the same way again! But what’s it like to use in the real world? You won’t have to wait until the formal…

Purported ISIS Message Threatens Jordanian Hostage

CAIRO, Jan 29 (Reuters) – An audio message purportedly from Japanese hostage Kenji Goto said a Jordanian air force pilot held by Islamic State militants would be killed unless an Iraqi female prisoner held by the Jordanian authorities was released by sunset on Jan. 29.

The message, which could not be verified by Reuters, was posted on YouTube early on Thursday. The Japanese government is analyzing the purported new voice recording, a spokesman for Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s office said.

“I am Kenji Goto. This is a voice message I’ve been told to send to you. If Sajida al-Rishawi is not ready for exchange for my life at the Turkish border by Thursday sunset 29th of January Mosul time, the Jordanian pilot Muath al-Kasaesbeh will be killed immediately,” the voice in the recording says.

(Reporting by Samia Nakhoul; Writing by Nick Tattersall; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)

Governors Ige and Snyder Battle It Out For Best 'Kermit The Frog' Impression

Hawaii is just getting used to the nasally monotone of its new governor, but David Ige — the Twitterverse has noted — sounds eerily familiar:

But Ige isn’t the only frog in the puddle. Turns out, the recognizable and calming inflection has gotten more than one politician elected.

Michigan governor Rick Snyder has been eliciting comparisons to everyone’s favorite Muppet since he was elected four years ago.

Twitter took note of the similarity again last week during Snyder’s State of the State address:

While both governors may have frogs in their throats (sorry!), there can only be one gubernatorial Amphibitarian.

Check out the clips below of each governor’s State of the State address and help us decide who does the best “Kermit.” Runner up earns “Bert” status.

Ernie Banks Statue Moved To Downtown Chicago For Fans To Pay Tribute

CHICAGO (AP) — Ernie Banks fans got their first chance to pay their respects to the most famous and beloved Chicago Cub who ever played after the statue of the Hall of Famer was placed in a downtown plaza Wednesday.

One after another, fans stopped in Daley Plaza to take photos of the statue that normally stands at Wrigley Field. The city and the Cubs took the unprecedented step of taking the statue out of storage – where it was being held while the ballpark is renovated – and putting it on public display away from its usual home.

The 83-year-old Banks died Friday of a heart attack. A visitation will be held this coming Friday, followed by a memorial service Saturday.

By 7:30 a.m. Wednesday, the plaza was growing crowded with fans admiring the statue of Banks, frozen in the batting stance that kids in Chicago in the 1950s and 1960s grew up imitating. They told stories about their connections to Banks, whether it was watching him play or meeting him.

“My family and my brothers were always watching him on TV and there was nobody like Ernie Banks,” said McKenzie Holmes, 51, his postal worker uniform topped off with a Cubs hat. “My brother just passed and I was thinking he’s up there playing catch with Ernie now.”

Trudi Burns took pictures for her son. Though he’s 23 and has only seen Banks in action on clips of games played long before he was born, Burns said he insisted she take a photo.

“It’s his birthday this month and he said, `Mom, I don’t want anything else. I just want a picture of Ernie,'” she said, adding that the day Banks died her son named his new puppy Banks.

Jim Kosik, 54, told of how Banks signed a ball for him in the 60s – a ball he has since lost. He, too, took pictures, for himself and his family.

“I will send a photo to relatives who left Chicago so they can share the moment,” he said.

Later, Mayor Rahm Emanuel, accompanied by Banks’ widow, placed a wreath at the statue, saying that while Banks has long been known as Mr. Cub, he “always will be and always has been Mr. Chicago.”

The statue will remain at Daley Plaza through Saturday, just a few feet away from a Picasso sculpture – an ironic placement given that in 1967 an alderman called on the city to replace what he saw as a hideous piece of junk with a statue of, that’s right, Ernie Banks.

Psychopathic Politics in Congo

I received an email recently from Goma in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

The violences (sic) that have started at the beginning of this week have continued up to now and it is reported that five people died only yesterday. The Internet was established only today but in town there is no activity.

Communications like these force me to cast aside writer’s malaise and try once again to examine events in Congo and explain the convoluted and psychotic forces operating there to interested readers.

Has President Joseph Kabila finally revealed his true colors to the world? At least 36 people, including a police officer, were killed in demonstrations against proposed changes to the constitution. The changes would require a national census before the 2016 presidential elections. Political opposition leaders say the changes were aimed at extending President Kabila’s term beyond the constitutionally mandated two terms.

Kabila assumed office in in 2001, ten days after the assassination of his father, President Laurent-Désiré Kabila. Before Laurent Kabila, there was Joseph Mobutu (Mobutu Sese Seko) who staged a coup against President Joseph Kasavubu in 1965. Kasavubu’s Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba, instrumental in forging Congo’s independence from Belgium in 1960, was assassinated in 1961.

2015-01-26-palace.jpg

2015-01-26-gomastreet.jpg

Images: Mobutu’s former palace dining room in Goma, now the Provincial Capitol and street scene in Goma near the palace grounds (Photos: G. Nienaber)

Whether Lumumba was directly killed by the CIA, Britain’s M16, or Congolese actors aided by Belgium, the inconvenient Lumumba was eliminated. Since Mobutu, it has been difficult for Congo’s leaders to stay alive, let alone retain power. It is reasonable to assume the younger Kabila’s proposed census could never be completed before 2016. Congo is an impoverished nation, with no roads, and no access to remote villages in a landscape the size of Western Europe.

It was a smart move on Kabila’s part to suggest the census to buy time.

The United States is expressing muted interest in the violence that has been ramping up as protests spread.

Demonstrations were held in cities across the country, including Kinshasa, Bukavu, Bunia, Goma, Lubumbashi, Mbandaka, and Uvira. In Kinshasa, protesters demonstrated on January 19, 20, and 21 near the Palais du Peuple parliament building, around the University of Kinshasa, and in Bandal, Kalamu, Kasa-vubu, Kimbanseke, Lemba, Limete, Makala, Masina, Matete, Ndjili, and Ngaba communes.

2015-01-26-village.jpg
Village in Congo (Photo:G. Nienaber)

I realize the names mean nothing to readers who have never been to Congo. But names offer a sense of place to start a conversation about Congo. These are villages and cities populated with people living in a country where politicians, rebel armies, mercenaries and western interests control the world’s most valuable natural resources. The Congolese have no personal wealth at all. Average income in Congo is $288 per year. Do the simple math. This is less than a dollar a day.

Human Rights Watch, and other press accounts say at least four were killed by government security forces in the Provincial Capitol of Goma. Add the five we know about from my friend’s email and it as at least nine there. Then, remember this is Congo, and we will never know the true numbers. HRW documented a number of instances in which police or Republican Guard soldiers took away the bodies of those shot in an apparent attempt to remove evidence.

HRW announced on Tuesday that on January 26 the president of the human rights organization Synergie Congo Culture et Développement (Congo Culture and Development Synergy) was in the custody of Congo’s national intelligence agency. Christopher Ngoyi Mutamba was involved in mobilizing public participation in demonstrations against proposed changes to the electoral law, on January 12 and during the week of January 19, in the capital, Kinshasa. He has been missing since January 21.

A State Department Press Release issued on Sunday urged Kabila to sign legislation passed by the Congolese Assembly on Friday that requires elections to be completed no later than December 2016. This would seem to mitigate the conflicts, but Kabila has not indicated that he would accept the compromise. There is still uncertainty over the timing of the elections, including whether presidential polls will be held by the end of Kabila’s second five-year term next year. Protests continue at this writing and the government has blocked the Internet and social messaging forums.

After the 2006 presidential elections, HRW published an extensive report, “We Will Crush You.” The report documented evidence that Kabila’s was using violence and intimidation to eliminate political opposition in the country’s first democratically held elections in over 40 years. After his victory, Kabila stated for all to hear that he would be “severe” in governing Congo. The reprisals were especially severe in eastern Congo, where former General Laurent Nkunda’s CNDP army was leading an insurgency against Kabila’s regime. I wanted to use the adjective “brutal” to describe Kabila’s actions, but the report speaks for itself.

Kabila was not just focused on the CNDP. One could argue justification of reprisals against an insurgency, no matter how deep grass roots sympathy anchored the rebellion.

But the truth is another matter. Congolese state security forces killed an estimated 500 people and detained about 1,000 more, many of whom were tortured, after Joseph Kabila took office in 2006, according to reports from Human Rights Watch and others. The victims were political opponents.

The question is why HRW so systematically went after the CNDP in 2006 and its reincarnation, the M23, in 2012? During both insurgencies, press reports said that it was Congolese troops committing many if not most of the atrocities that are a by-product of war. Even the Oscar nominated movie, Virunga, which was filmed only with the cooperation of the Kabila government, skips over the root causes of the conflict. Let’s remember the 60,000 who vanished from an IDP camp, documented in the movie, without a blink from the filmmakers. Had the IDP issue been exposed or pursued during filming, it is certain the documentary would never have been made. Kabila would have “crushed” it. Many were fleeing the Congo army.

So now, we find HRW and the U.S. State Department crying crocodile tears over Kabila’s actions. Like the calculated actions of a psychopath, Kabila had telegraphed his intentions while he was carefully grooming the international press, NGOs, and filmmakers to ignore his pathological behavior against the opposition. Kabila successfully triangulated his relationships in order to justify vilification of anyone who successfully protested his regime.

Most people in the West just don’t care. We are not that “into” Congo. Only when there is a gruesome war, punctuated by rape and atrocity, does it become interesting. Only when the piercing screams of women and children penetrate the silence do we tune in to brief and incomplete news reports. We believe the psychopath because he has gathered a cheerleading international press corps to circle the palace, while the United Nations functions as the defacto palace guard.

Will the Congolese face another violent year, as Kabila makes good on his 2006 promise to “crush” opposition? Or, will Kabila sign the new legislation? A dictator ruling over a democracy is a dangerous entity. It offers nothing but cognitive dissonance. Let the people decide.

Acemile Theatre Box wireless speaker boasts full 360-degree 3D sound

Black THEATRE BOXSpeakers offering 360-degree sound are becoming increasingly popular, and standing newest among them is Acemile’s new Theatre Box speaker. Unlike some competing 3D sound speakers, this one is rectangular instead of round, featuring speakers on all the side edges so that music and other audio disperses in all directions. Beyond the 3D surround sound are some more typical features, including … Continue reading

Criminalizing Victims: How the Punishment Economy Failed Marissa Alexander

On the day that domestic violence survivor Marissa Alexander fired a warning shot at her abusive estranged husband Rico Gray, he assaulted her and threatened to kill her. Despite the shot causing no injuries, Alexander was initially sentenced to 20 years in prison.

Alexander successfully appealed her unjust conviction and last November accepted a plea deal for three years with credit for time served. Today, unless the presiding judge chooses to add an additional five years to her sentence, she will walk out of the Duval County jail, though she will be required to wear a surveillance monitor and be on probation for two years.

Initially, Alexander invoked Stand Your Ground as a defense — the same defense that allowed George Zimmerman to go free after his murder of Trayvon Martin — but in her case, the judge found that Stand Your Ground did not apply. Instead, the burden was placed on Alexander to prove that she acted in self-defense.

Despite suffering years of abuse at the hands of her ex-husband, our justice system did not treat Marissa Alexander as someone who was simply defending herself, but rather as the wrongdoer. And her case is only one example of how the punishment economy created by our criminal justice system criminalizes victims.

In November 2012 in South Carolina, Whitlee Jones’ boyfriend dragged her down the street by her hair and beat her. After another confrontation, she stabbed him in self-defense and he died. A judge initially found that Jones had the right to kill her attacker under South Carolina’s version of Stand Your Ground, but prosecutors are fighting that decision, alleging that it does not apply in domestic violence cases where the two parties were housemates.

In October 2006 in Texas, Arlena Lindley’s abusive partner murdered her son. She was later sentenced to 45 years in prison for failing to protect her son from her abusive partner. An investigation by Buzzfeed found 28 mothers in 11 states sentenced to at least 10 years in prison for failing to prevent partners from hurting their children, despite the mothers being victims of domestic violence themselves.

In many cases, victims of rape have been punished for refusing to testify against their assailants. In August 2012, a woman brought charges against a 63-year-old Nebraska man for assaulting her when she was a child. When she later changed her mind and refused to testify in order to avoid embarrassing her family, the judge threatened her with a contempt charge and 90 days of jail time.

In each of these instances, we can certainly blame faulty laws, like Stand Your Ground, for their inadequacies, identify how to fix them, and make incremental changes. But for systemic change to occur, we need to move away from being a society where our first inclination is always to punish someone in order to solve a problem.

In a punishment economy, punitive solutions are applied to all social problems, particularly those involving low-income people of color, because as a whole, the government prioritizes funding for prisons and policing over social support mechanisms.

A 2011 report from the NAACP found that within the last two decades, state spending on prisons grew at six times the rate of state spending on higher education. Between 2009 and 2012, states cut $5 billion in mental health services, while spending more on prisons and jails.

A funding decision made by the state government in Mississippi offers an especially illuminating example of what operating in an economy that values punishment looks like: In February 2013, the state government had millions of dollars in federal child-care funding for low-income families, but instead of increasing services, they gave a $14.7 million contract to Xerox to develop a security system requiring mothers using child care vouchers to scan their fingerprints when they picked up their children.

In a punishment economy, we criminalize students who act out by placing them in juvenile detention centers, instead of increasing funding for restorative justice counselors in schools. We imprison people who suffer from substance abuse and mental health problems, instead of improving and expanding publicly funded treatment programs. And instead of increasing the capacity of domestic violence organizations to support victims, we penalize those victims for the decisions they make in order to survive.

People of color in particular are often the targets of this punishment economy.
A common denominator in many of the above cases is that the person accused is a black woman. The #BlackLivesMatter movement aims to draw attention to the multiple ways in which our nation’s justice system fails to protect the lives of all black people.

The cases referenced above illustrate how the punishment economy hurts women, but its influence pervades our whole society and the end result is more people trapped in a cycle of mass criminalization and incarceration.

Now that Marissa Alexander has served time in prison, she is likely to face greater obstacles obtaining employment, housing, and health care. And when she returns home, she will have to pay $105 per week to the state in monitoring fees. The cost of punishment chases people long after they have served their time.

For change to happen, we must focus our resources on mechanisms of support. There is another way forward that does not involve punishment or jail. It’s time to stop criminalizing victims and provide help instead.

Mitt Romney Courts Middle Class, Jabs Hillary Clinton During Mississippi Speech

STARKVILLE, Miss. (AP) — Mitt Romney hasn’t officially declared himself a presidential candidate again, but the 2012 Republican nominee looked and sounded like one during a stop in Mississippi, back-slapping at a popular barbecue joint before delivering a speech that questions Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton’s foreign policy and economic credentials.

The speech at Mississippi State University marks Romney’s third public appearance since he shocked the political world earlier in the month by signaling interest in another presidential run. In his comeback bid, Romney has focused particular attention on the poor and middle class as he tries to broaden his appeal.

“How can Secretary Clinton provide opportunity for all if she doesn’t know where jobs come from in the first place?” Romney says in excerpts of the speech obtained by The Associated Press.

“We need to restore opportunity, particularly for the middle class. And that will soon include you,” Romney says. “You deserve a job that can repay all you’ve spent and borrowed to go to college.”

Before his evening address on campus, Romney stopped at a popular barbecue joint, bounding out of a black SUV to shake hands with employees, townspeople and students.

He displayed a good sense of local priorities with his choice of tour guides: MSU head football Coach Dan Mullen and his wife, Megan. Dan Mullen praised Romney’s record in business and as governor. “I would certainly endorse Governor Romney,” he said.

When one well-wisher told Romney he’d been his choice for the White House in 2012, the former Massachusetts governor smiled and replied, “I wish I was there right now.”

But he ignored questions from reporters inquiring about his plans for 2016.

Romney has consistently outlined three principles that could serve as the foundation of a campaign in his public appearances, while often referencing his work with the poor, sick and elderly as a volunteer church pastor — a topic he rarely addressed during his previous bids. His new focus includes national security, improving opportunities for the middle class and ending poverty.

The shift is designed to counter critics who have long cast Romney as an out-of-touch millionaire. He fueled the perception himself during a campaign filled with high-profile missteps tied in some way to money.

No gaffe was bigger than his remark — secretly recorded at a high-dollar Florida fundraiser — that he didn’t worry about the 47 percent of Americans who “believe they are victims” and “pay no income tax.”

A Clinton spokesman did not immediately respond to Romney’s planned remarks, although the Democratic National Committee fired back.

“We don’t really need to hear a lecture on ‘where jobs come from’ from a guy who’s best known for bankrupting companies and profiting off of outsourcing,” DNC spokesman Mo Elleithee said.

Noting strong job growth over the last year, Elleithee continued, “I don’t know if Mitt Romney thinks 47 percent of those folks are ‘takers,’ but I am sure he’s not the right guy to talk about expanding opportunity.”

Romney has acknowledged privately in recent weeks that he will make a decision about the 2016 campaign soon. While Romney was the overwhelming establishment favorite in the last election, the likely 2016 field includes other economic conservatives — including former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie — who have taken steps towards campaigns of their own.

Aides say Romney will likely signal his 2016 intentions over the next two weeks.

He currently has a skeleton staff working largely on a volunteer basis, although Romney has more than $2 million in his presidential campaign fund as of late November, which would give him a significant head start over some competitors should he enter the race.

In his Wednesday speech, Romney recalls meeting people during his 2012 campaign who had fallen into poverty because of circumstances, such as losing a job, and those stuck in poverty for generations.

“These we have to help escape the tragedy and the trap of chronic generational poverty,” Romney says. “It’s finally time to apply conservative policies that improve America’s education system, promote family formation and create good-paying jobs.”

He also takes direct aim at the foreign policy record of Clinton, the overwhelming frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination should she run.

“Secretary of State Hillary Clinton cluelessly pressed a reset button for Russia, which smiled and then invaded Ukraine, a sovereign nation,” Romney says. “We need to help make the world a safer place.”

The university’s Student Government Association invited Romney before he’d talked of a 2016 campaign. Romney aides said he is donating his $50,000 speaking fee, minus his travel costs, to CharityVision, a Utah-based organization that offers eye care to the poor.

__

Associated Press reporter Jim Kuhnhenn contributed to this report. Peoples and Kuhnhenn reported from Washington, D.C.