Google Search For Android Gets New UI For Movie-Related Searches

google moviesIf you were to perform a search on your mobile device for a movie either using the Google Search app or Chrome for Android, you will get the results to links about the movie, some photos, and also some links to the cast of the movie. This has been the way Google has displayed movie results for a while now, but it looks like Google has introduced a new UI for movie-related searches.

The new search results are now displayed in a gallery that is similar to what you might expect from the Google Play Store or other apps, and as expected it looks like Google has given the search results a Material Design treatment which was what the company introduced to its apps with the Android 5.0 Lollipop update.

However interestingly enough as noted by the folks at Android Police, this search feature only works when the user enters the word “movies” in their search query. So for example if you were to type the name of an actor, actress, or director, the original knowledge graph would pop up, but if you were to add “movies” at the end of their names, you will get Google’s new UI.

We’re not sure why there is a difference, perhaps Google will apply it to all searches in the future, but for now if you want to access it, remember to type “movies” after the name. It’s a pretty cool update and for those looking for quick results for movies or their actors, this should do in a pinch.

Google Search For Android Gets New UI For Movie-Related Searches , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

SlatePro TechDesk SE Is A Table For All Your Tech Needs

slatepro techdeskWhen we look for a desk to put our computers on, as long as it it big and sturdy enough, for the most part we are fine with it. However if you’re a power user who wants to get the most out of their desk as possible, you might be interested in the SlatePro TechDesk SE. If the name sounds vaguely familiar, it is because last year the company launched the SlatePro TechDesk.

The SlatePro TechDesk SE is basically a special edition version of the original with some updates to its design and features. Now just in case you missed our report from last year, the SlatePro TechDesk is a desk for laptop users where it comes with vents to help cool your laptop, docks for your smartphone and tablets, as well as better cable management.

However with the special edition version, iSkelter, the company behind the original table, has updated its design. Most notable are the changes the company has made to the legs of the table which feature a U-shape design made from steel. The tabletop has changed and is now made from a hazelnut bamboo surface.

There is also an inclusion of a stainless steel cupholder and a dry erase board where you can write down notes, but other than that the table has kept most of its features, such as the cutouts to help with ventilation and a variety of grooves and docks for your smartphone and tablet. If this sounds like a table you wouldn’t mind getting your hands on, you can order one via iSkelter’s website for $598. The original SlatePro TechDesk is still on sale where it is priced slightly cheaper at $498.

SlatePro TechDesk SE Is A Table For All Your Tech Needs , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Qualcomm Confirms A “Large Customer” Won’t Be Using Their Snapdragon 810

qualcomm-logoWe have been hearing rumors that the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S6 will be ditching the Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 chipset. The rumors are suggesting that this could be due to an overheating issue, while other rumors have suggested that Samsung’s decision was not so much a technical one, but a business one in which they are hoping to promote their Exynos chipsets instead.

While we can’t be sure if this is indeed the case, Qualcomm has since confirmed that at least one of their larger customers will not be packing the Snapdragon 810 chipset in their products. This was confirmed during Qualcomm’s earnings report in which they claimed that the Snapdragon 810 will most likely not be making its way into a “large customer’s flagship device”.

Unsurprisingly Qualcomm did not mention any names, but considering that Samsung is probably one of the larger smartphone OEMs around at the moment, there is a good chance that Qualcomm could have been talking about them, especially given that LG is already packing the Snapdragon 810 in their LG G Flex 2 handset.

It also seems that whoever this “large customer” is, their decision to pass on the Snapdragon 810 has gotten Qualcomm a little worried. “A shift in share among OEMs at the premium tier, which has reduced our near-term opportunity for sales of our integrated Snapdragon processors and has skewed our product mix towards more modem chipsets in this tier.” So, who do you guys think this could be? Or is it very obviously Samsung?

Qualcomm Confirms A “Large Customer” Won’t Be Using Their Snapdragon 810 , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Alleged Moto E Successor Render Leaked

moto e styxBack in 2014, Motorola launched the Moto E handset. It was an entry-level handset aimed at customers who did not want to splurge on a high-end device, and given that we’re already in 2015, a successor to the Moto E might not seem like such a stretch. In fact a leak earlier this month revealed a possible successor in the form of the Moto E Styx.

Now thanks to the folks at Android Police, they have managed to get their hands on a purported rendering of the Moto E successor, which you can see in the image above. Based on the rendering, it looks like Motorola has decided to give the handset a slight makeover in terms of its design. However it is a bit suspicious that there is a huge gap between the top speaker grill to the display of the phone which was not present in the original Moto E.

Also gone is the second speaker grill which means there is a chance that the stereo speaker effect could have been removed from the phone. The back of the phone also reveals that there is no camera flash, a sign of low-end devices, but apart from that the rest of the phone is pretty straightforward with nothing to shout about.

We can’t tell if this rendering is the real deal, but with MWC 2015 kicking off in March, perhaps we will learn more about the Moto E’s successor then, but for now do take it all with a grain of salt.

Alleged Moto E Successor Render Leaked , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

SpaceX shows how its heavy-lifting rocket will (hopefully) work

SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy has yet to grace a launch pad, but that isn’t stopping the company from extolling the reusable rocket’s virtues. Elon Musk and crew have posted an animation (below) demonstrating how a typical mission with the heavy-duty reusabl…

Qualcomm confirms loss of a 'large customer', probably Samsung

Qualcomm’s presence inside many of the world’s most popular mobile devices over the last few years has kept the money coming in (creating the need for the picture shown above), but today there was some bad news. In its Q4 earnings release, the compan…

‘A Most Violent Year' Explores Dark Reality Of The American Dream

“A Most Violent Year” has all the glamour of a classic gangster film. But its plot sidesteps the violence motif to explore the American dream through the eyes of its Latino hero.

The slow-burn drama has its moments of action, most notably with a climactic chase scene that showcases the grit of New York City in 1981. But overall, the film portrays the steady unraveling of a Latino immigrant’s business and peace of mind during what is statistically the most violent year in city history.

Director and writer J.C. Chandor (“Margin Call,” “All Is Lost”) is no stranger to writing films that focus on a particular moment in a character’s life and presenting it on a grand scale. He calls it “operatic.”

Guatemalan-born actor Oscar Isaac, 35, (“Inside Llewyn Davis) leads the cast as Abel Morales, a righteous Latino immigrant who finds his ambition at odds with his sense of morality as his family’s well-being and the growth of his heating oil business are continually threatened by factors outside of his control.

Chandor, an Oscar-nominated director, spoke to The Huffington Post recently about how the film portrays the dark reality of realizing the American dream in a cutthroat capitalist city, and why he always envisioned his hero as a Latino immigrant.

“This was a story I’ve probably been building for four, five years about a husband and wife couple, immigrant, first- or second-generation,” Chandor said. “And probably in that early period realizing that it might be neat just to really kind of cross-section the American diaspora a little bit and have that be a mixed-nationality marriage. Because that’s the way this country works. We all kind of come here and eventually combine ourselves with each other in one way shape or form. It’s the great thing about human beings.”

After refining the husband-wife storyline, Chandor said he sought to couple the narrative with ideas of violence and how it’s portrayed in movies he’s seen over the years. In the end, Chandor decided he would set the film in 1981 — New York’s most violent year.

Actor Javier Bardem was originally tapped for the role of Abel Morales, but Chandor said the two failed to agree on where they wanted to take the character. Jessica Chastain (who plays wife Anna Morales) then recommended Isaac, her friend and former Juilliard schoolmate.

Chandor said he he always intended Abel Morales to be Latino.

“I wanted the character to be representative of the largest group of immigrants. In the last 40 years, that’s the Latino wave,” Chandor said. “I also wanted [the film] to be representational and sort of operatic, and so that felt like a natural choice. And also, frankly, I’m sort of fascinated by American representations of masculinity and what that means. There are these wonderful series of stereotypes, and some of them quite destructive and other ones true like any stereotype about Latin men. Especially [those] that come to the United States and how they achieve this success. This sort of Scarface myth of the hot-tempered Latin male who can’t control himself when it’s really the push-comes-to-shove kind of thing.

“[And] when I was really bringing the story together with the violent angle, I thought it would be a really cool turn of events, where you kind of are just waiting for this guy the whole movie to just lose his fucking top and just shoot someone,” the director added. “It’s what the whole movie is structured on.”

Abel Morales’ internal struggles to stay on what the character calls “the path that is most right” are hindered by factors that show the realities of the American dream. One obstacle is his employee, Julian, a Latino driver in the oil company who Morales initially wants to help find the same success he has enjoyed, but later turns away for the sake of his business.

“It’s been obviously this sort of wonderful Latino immigration in the United States and all that wonderful new energy and optmism,” Chandor said. “But yet there’s this reality of that with the wonderful success and stability that so many of us have been able to achieve here, it also comes on the back of a lot of people who didn’t and weren’t lucky or didn’t have the skill set or had the skill set, but weren’t lucky.”

While the film seems to explore the darkness of an immigrant’s quest for his American dream, it’s really about testing the limits of a man’s ambition.

“The American Dream in my mind is just obsessive Americans naming something that’s actually a human trait, which is ambition,” Chandor said. “So it goes all the way back to the beginning of humankind, when there’s three people living in a valley and then there’s suddenly 100 people living in the valley and some people realize, ‘We gotta climb over this hill to find somewhere else to plant some corn ‘cause we’ve over-planted here,’ so the ambitious people are the ones that say, ‘Well, let’s go.’

“America is just that, but it’s a lot of us all gathered in one, and so we’re a pretty ambitious lot,” Chandor continued. “But essentially, that is what is at that core of the American experience, and so you know I was looking for a wonderful tool to tell that story and I think in these guys I hopefully found it.”

Chandor didn’t shy away from delving into Abel Morales’ heritage, either. Notably, the director includes an all-Spanish scene with Julian’s sister (Catalina Sandino Moreno) that he said helps viewers realize the role of his heritage in his plans to succeed.

“Well, that scene is one of my favorites in the entire movie,” Chandor said. “What I wanted to do is remind the audience late in the movie who he was again. … Oscar and I worked out his backstory — he probably came to the United States when he was between 7 and 10 or 11 years old. At that point, in the late-’50s, when he would’ve come here, for his goal to be a successful businessman, you had to sort of sand away your accent and change your garb. He’s almost dressed in this WASP stock broker outfit. Oscar and I always thought that he probably over-assimilated. People are always talking about assimilation, but he probably stripped too much of his heritage away for his own emotional happiness. But who knows? It’s Abel’s life. We’re not going to judge him too harshly on it.

“What that scene is communicating to you there is he’s a pragmatic person,” Chandor continued. “So he’s not going to sit there and struggle through a conversation with her in [English]. He’s there for business.”

“A Most Violent Year” premiered with a limited release on Dec. 31 and was named film of the year by the National Board Of Review, with Isaac and Chastain receiving awards for best actor and best supporting actress, respectively. Aside from Chastain’s Golden Globe nomination for her role, the movie has been largely overlooked by major awards this season.

Chandor, a New Jersey native, said Abel Morales’ experience reflects the stories of many immigrants, including one he witnessed.

“Well anyone who has a realistic understanding of the immigrant experience knows that some people go mad from it because you’re away from your home, it’s a horrible thing,” Chandor said. “I use to live next to these guys, where four of them lived in one little room and they would rotate in and out of there, and it was only two beds and they basically worked shifts. We’d see one come in to this little apartment building where we had an apartment for a while, and there was like a rotation.

“And so [Julian is] there to remind Abel and remind us that we’re very fortunate.” Chandor added. “My family came here as immigrants, just like most of us did, and I’m very fortunate that I am living off of those sort of foundations that they laid for me.”

“A Most Violent Year” opens at theaters nationwide on Friday.

On the Set of FX's 'The Americans': or, How to Survive Being an Extra on the Graveyard Shift

2015-01-26-IMG_0356.jpg

About two years ago, I got a call to work as an “extra” on an overnight shoot for the pilot of the FX show The Americans, starring Keri Russell and Matthew Rhys. “Extras” or “background actors” — euphemisms designed to spare our feelings and place us at least somewhere on the continuum with our colleagues who actually speak — are the folks that cross the street, ride the elevator, work in the cubicles and are generally peppered about a set or location, providing professional and easily controlled “atmosphere” (another euphemism). As it begins its third season, I’d like to think that I may have contributed in a small way to its success (more on that later*).

Extra work can be easy or hard. Mostly it is just boring. However, my work on The Americans was an overnight shoot so it was, at least, certain to be lucrative. Here is a breakdown of that day and night:

2:00 p.m. — The show is set in 1981 and the agency asked that I bring my own period-correct wardrobe. As an avid collector of vintage clothing, I simply went to my closet and chose a suit from 1981 (slight flare in the trouser, thin label, double vent). I put it on for the first time in years. “Gee, these trousers are a bit snug,” I thought, “but I guess I’ll be okay.” Bad decision number one. The first rule of thumb when you are bringing your own wardrobe to set is that the clothing should be comfortable. But you know that phenomena when a garment feels okay when you’re in the house and then doesn’t feel okay later? I had a very bad case of that. Ditto the very stylish Oxford lace-ups I chose, only remembering hours later why I don’t ever wear them. After a few minutes they hurt and after a few more minutes my feet felt like they were on fire. Bad decision number two. I finished the look with what I whimsically refer to as my lucky pedophile glasses: the very period-correct window-style rimless shades.

3:00 p.m. — I grabbed my overnight bag filled with reading material and jaunted out the door, leaving my apartment in Jersey City and taking the PATH train to Manhattan, and then the subway to Brooklyn.

4:00 p.m. — Unfailingly punctual, I arrived at St. Francis College in Downtown Brooklyn a few minutes early, grabbed a slice of pizza, then reported to the “holding area,” which is a designated place for extras to wait until required on set, where I was greeted by Abby and Kevin, the upbeat duo responsible for coordinating the background actors. The phrase “holding area” has always made me think of a farm. On this particular shoot we were a fairly large group of extras — at least thirty. Some of us were supposed to be FBI agents and others were supposed to be Department of Justice employees. This struck me as funny as I was under the impression that the Department of Justice referred to Wonder Woman, Superman and the rest of the Super Friends. I only realized later I was, perhaps, thinking of the Hall of Justice. I proceeded to find an isolated table, sat down, and started reading a book.

5:00 p.m. — Despite having just had a slice of pizza, I felt like a nosh; well at least I thought I did. It is common on a set to think you’re very hungry even when you’re not. This is due to the many hours of waiting around and the constant availability of a craft services table or truck (annoyingly nicknamed a crafty — every object and every action on a set seemingly has an annoying nickname). After a few minutes, I got permission to go over to the crafty where I ate an entire meal for the simple reason that it was there. Bad decision number three.

6:00 p.m. — We were slowly processed through hair, make-up and wardrobe. My outfit was approved and they put a little powder on my face. Not much you can do with my hair, but since I was playing an FBI agent, they seemed happy enough. We were sent to be “propped up” –another annoying expression. There is something about being told to get “propped up” that makes me want to rebel and not get “propped up” — maybe because I don’t like the sound of being “propped up,” or maybe the insider lingo suggests undue importance for what is really going to happen, which is that I am going to be walking by in the background holding a briefcase. Either way I didn’t like it, but I did it because that was my job. Turns out I brought my own prop, a period briefcase, thus ensuring I would have whatever necessities I might need with me at all times: tissues; water; a book; my phone, etc. The prop mistress did however give me an FBI badge, which made me feel slightly important, albeit briefly. Now in compliance with the mandate to be “propped up” and I moved on.

7:00 p.m. — All thirty extras were walked over to the location in the actual Supreme Court building a few blocks away and led to an on-site “holding area,” an actual courtroom, in fact. I tend to keep to myself on these shoots for the simple reason that I prefer to read and write, and if you get roped into a conversation with someone who is impervious to social cues it can be catastrophic, so I tend to be polite, professional and a bit aloof. Background actors are, as a group, a bit over-the-top in their need for attention.

Many do this kind of work for a living, and excessive talkativeness is an inevitable side effect of being a background actor with a foreground ego. Failing an actual speaking part, most will settle for peer validation and endless commiseration, which can often result in a range of social maladjustments, the most egregious being a tendency to take hostages in conversation, a form of interpersonal terrorism where the victim is forced to endure long and often bizarre monologues that usually reveal far more about the actor’s mental state than the level of acquaintance merits.

I found a bench and before I could even set up my bags, a blonde actress of “a certain age” began a rambling soliloquy of cringe-inducing over-sharing. “This courtroom is strangely familiar to me,” she began, apropos of nothing and oblivious to the fact that I was a stranger. “I wonder why?” she continued. She was acting and, apparently, I was her camera. I braced myself because I knew what was coming. “Hm. Oh, I know! The reason why is my divorce. Yeah, just got divorced a few years ago. Didn’t work out, it wasn’t the worst divorce in the world but — ya know — it was still a divorce, and I mean divorce is always painful, at least mine was. You’ll never guess why we got divorced. Turns out he was gay, can you believe it? But I said to him, ‘Listen, you’re gay, it’s fine, have a great life, I don’t want to hold you back.'” Numb and immobilized by my embarrassment for this poor, unloved extra, I nodded politely and turned back to my book, praying mightily that my colleague would find some other gay to regale with personal details of her life. What can you do in situations like this? You want to acknowledge a person’s existence but any approbation perpetuates the effluence of over-sharing, which forces you eventually to be rude. I must have found the right tone of indifference, because within five minutes Miss Lonely-hearts found a suitable replacement with whom she spent the next thirteen hours confiding deeply personal things while I, gratefully, read my book.

8:00 p.m. — Abby and Kevin asked us all to line up for inspection. The director, Gavin O’Connor, entered the courtroom and slowly began assessing the extras and separating us into sub-groups that would provide atmosphere for the different set-ups planned for the shoot. As he went down the line, the extras stood at attention with hopeful, obsequious expressions, each hoping that Gavin would assign them some preferential responsibility or — the Holy Grail for extras — the assignation of a line of dialogue that would result in a union-mandated upgrade. I took my place in line. When he got to me, Gavin asked my name. “David Munk,” I answered. “Nice period glasses, David,” he remarked, proving again that I don’t call ’em “my lucky pedophile glasses” for nothin’. His comment, though pleasant, reminded me that despite my efforts to deny my feelings, I was in many ways as eager to feel seen as the divorcee or the rest of the “Super Friends.” We were then broken into three groups and I sat back down, conscious that my trousers, which I formerly regarded as “a bit snug,” needed to be upgraded to “extremely uncomfortable.” Could it have been my neurotic eating at the crafty?

9:30 p.m. — I was called for my first scene, which involved me waiting for a cue from Kevin, opening a door, walking out into a hallway (behind the principals who were having a conversation), walking down the corridor away from the camera, pretending to take a drink of water from a broken water fountain, walking two more steps to an elevator, pressing the button, counting to five, stepping on to the elevator, and waiting for Gavin to yell “cut.” I did this seven or eight times. It was not hard, though, to be completely honest, it did hurt my pride a little.

11:00 p.m. — Crew breaks for “lunch,” which is what they called it even though it is 11:00 p.m. We walked back to the first holding area a few blocks away. It was a huge spread (common on shoots). Though I wasn’t hungry, I overate again, filled with regret before I even finished my first serving, which did not prevent me from going back for seconds. With the second helping of “lunch” I decided it would make more sense to just stop counting my bad decisions entirely, which turned out to be something novel: a good decision. It was around this time I noticed that it was raining.

11:45 p.m. — We were told to head back to the Supreme Court building and the holding area there. Problem was the rain was now torrential. They provided vans to get us from one place to another but the van and my umbrella weren’t much help because it was raining sideways. When I got back to location, my back was soaking wet and my ill-fitting shoes, formerly merely pinching, were now squeaking, my wet socks hastening the development of festering blisters which made it impossible to walk without throbbing pain. I felt worse for the women who had to go back into hair and makeup to refresh their 1980-secretary looks which were awful in the first place, every one of them looked like Dorothy Michaels, Dustin Hoffman’s female character in Tootsie.

2015-01-26-IMG_0362.jpg

12:00 a.m. — I dried off quickly enough, but started experiencing stomach distress, certainly owing to the fact that my pants were two sizes too small and I had, at this point, been stuffing my face for eight consecutive hours. I also became aware of being quite tired for the first time. I noticed that many of the extras were stretched out on the courtroom benches and sleeping. I have never been able to sleep in public or in strange places and I regarded my colleagues with envy. As my eyes grew tired, I decided to switch from a book to a much more easy-to-read magazine. I took my wet shoes off to dry a bit and my feet began to swell in protest.

1:00 a.m. — I was finally called for my second scene. This one was set in an open office with several rows of tables. Once again, the FBI agents were supposed to be conversing while the principals did their scene. I was seated between two gentleman and when the director yelled “action,” we were supposed to pantomime conversation, which is actually not as easy as it seems, especially for someone like me who is not known for his subtle, small work. In fact, I was petrified of overacting. In hushed tones, extras have been known to repeat the phrase “peas and carrots,” or other nonsensical language to mimic the visual of a real conversation. When Gavin yelled action, I concentrated as hard as I could on being very, very, small and doing nothing to draw attention to myself, which to be honest, is completely inorganic for big, brassy me. The worse offense an extra can commit is “pulling focus.”

During the scene in question I found this almost impossible, not because of anything I was doing but because of what was happening around me. The actor to my right was really, really, BIG; his broad pantomime broadcasted that he was VERY UPSET about some perceived DELAY, for in his character’s interior life he had decided he was being kept WAITING. His broad gestures and exaggerated expressions screamed “CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS SHIT? I MEAN HOW LONG HAS IT BEEN?” and the level of his focus pulling made me very frightened that I was going to get implicated in his gesticulated RAILING against the gods for MAKING HIM WAIT! It occurred to me that what this actor was really mad about waiting for was the acting break that he never got.

But that’s not all: the other guy, the guy to my left, pretended to talk to me about something that seemed completely different from the guy to my right’s fake anger over being kept waiting. The guy to my left was soulful and soft, like he was telling me about the loss of a beloved pet, or a recent catastrophic diagnosis. The dissonance of these two fake conversations and their concomitant competition for my attention rendered me completely mute; in fact, I became nearly catatonic, terrified as I was that any attempt to share the guy on my right’s fake disgust or the guy on my left’s emotional pain would create a tsunami of focus pulling and the director would notice and publicly rebuke me.

Instead, I ignored my scene partners completely, stared straight ahead, occasionally whispered “peas and carrots” and robotically pointed to my official FBI document, like a wind-up toy at a carnival, all the while praying for the scene to end. This went on for thirty minutes and by the end of the scene my nerves were raw, my feet were throbbing, my stomach was grinding and I completely hated the angry guy on my right and the sad guy on my left in equal measure. Finally we were led back to holding again and I limped like an old boxer back to my corner.

3:00 a.m. — After another long period of waiting, many of the other background actors were released and went home. Because of my lucky pedophile glasses, I had been chosen for the conference room scene, which was the last shot of the night. As we were led into the conference room I wished that I had been a bit fresher, as there now seemed to be a high probability that I would actually be featured. I was having difficulty walking due to stomach distress and whatever part of me wasn’t wholly focused on walking without hitting into the walls was filled with remorse that I had eaten so much. My pants were digging in to my bloated stomach and my Oxford shoes were pinching terribly and squeaked every time I took a step from the 11:00 p.m. deluge.

It was in this condition that I entered what appeared to be a conference room right out of a 1970s film like The Anderson Tapes or The Parallax View: the centerpiece of the room was a heavy oval conference table, which was accentuated by wood paneled walls that followed the contours of the table — essentially a round room. The most peculiar feature of this time-warp conference room was a recessed ceiling, also in the shape of an oval, with an elaborate lighting fixture that looked like it fell into the room from an episode of The Six Million Dollar Man. If I wasn’t so troubled (feet, stomach, fatigue, hurt pride, hatred of mankind, etc.), I’m sure I would have enjoyed the perfectly preserved period room. Instead I was having trouble staying awake and trying mightily to manage the pain of my blisters and my pants that now dug into my stomach like calipers.

2015-01-26-IMG_0368.jpg

4:00 a.m. — As the technicians discussed angles and camera movement, I began to experience a strange auditory phenomena: the FBI agent across the table to my right would say something, but I could swear I was hearing it on my left. A moment later, someone to my left said something but I also heard it on my right. WTF? I looked up and realized that it was the ceiling whose odd physiognomy was somehow throwing the sound around the room like a ventriloquist, adding greatly to my general feeling of disorientation and anxiety. I wasn’t the only one: out of nowhere some FBI agent across the table started screaming and shaking his leg frantically, the victim, apparently, of a charley horse; but his howls of pain sounded like they were coming from behind me. I spun around in terror just as the director called “and… action!

It took all of my remaining energy to appear to be listening actively to the principal actors and block out the auditory hallucinations, throbbing feet, stabbing pain in my stomach and general bleary-eyed state of complete exhaustion. There was one female FBI agent seated across from me whose voice carried in a strange childlike way as it bounced around the room during takes. Like some old 1970s horror film, I swore I heard her say, “Help me mommy, it hurts,” but it was just the ceiling, throwing audio clips from The Little Girl Who Lives Down The Lane around the room like an old rag doll.

5:00 a.m. — Would this scene ever end? By 5:00 a.m. I was in such a bad way that I looked down at my briefcase and couldn’t remember the word for it! Naturally, I feared the worst and decided it was a brain tumor, associating Elizabeth Taylor’s moment of terror prior to receiving that diagnosis when, after picking up the phone to make a call in her Beverly Hills living room, she couldn’t remember how to do it. This was all the proof I needed to know that I too had a brain tumor. My anxiety abated around the time Gavin yelled “cut” for the last time, and we were “wrapped.” It was 5:10 a.m. I hobbled out of the Court building and limped to the curb like a whore at daybreak. There were no cabs anywhere so after a few minutes of standing around trying to find a ride, I tick-tocked into the subway, back into the darkness and headed toward home.

*Addendum: Several months later I excitedly watched the pilot of The Americans on FX, waiting for my big scene in the conference room. Suddenly, the two leads burst into the strangely shaped room. The camera slowly panned down the table of FBI agents. This was it! And just as the camera reached me, to be specific, just as the tip of my index finger came into view, they cut away. After all of that waiting and work, just the last joint of my right index finger was featured for a moment in the final product. In the end, my contribution to the success of The Americans may have been as small as one joint of one finger, but there it is and it is mine.

A version of this piece originally appeared in stargayzing.com

Snapchat As You Knew It Is Gone

One of the most popular messaging apps sure isn’t what it used to be, oh, 48 hours ago.

Snapchat on Tuesday announced a massive update called “Discover,” which will feature content from media outlets that the social network has partnered with. As of Wednesday, those outlets are CNN, Comedy Central, Cosmopolitan, Daily Mail, ESPN, Food Network, National Geographic, People, Vice, Yahoo! News and Warner Music Group.

And just a day after the update, AT&T announced that it would premiere on the platform a superhero series called “SnapperHero.” In it, social media personalities will take suggestions from fans, influencing the show’s 12-episode story. Keeping with the Snapchat tradition, episodes of the show will disappear 24 hours after they’re first made available.


Comedy Central’s page on Snapchat’s new Discover feature. More outlets for “Broad City”: Always a good thing.

The changes seem to emphasize branded content over that from individuals.

Still, “Discover” was met with some excitement: The NiemanLab said it “could be a significant moment in the evolution of mobile news.”

But regular Snapchatters just want to know where their “best friends” went. Users have flooded Twitter with complaints about the removal of the feature allowing anyone to view the three people a user most frequently interacted with. In theory, this “best friends” feature gave you some idea of who your friends were closest with, at least on Snapchat.

Snapchat did not respond to a request for comment on the changes.

It’s worth noting that while the official emphasis on media properties is new, brands like Taco Bell have long used Snapchat to reach teens and 20-somethings. If anything, the app’s new direction signals that Snapchat wants to play along — and reap ad revenue, too. We’ll see if the audience sticks around.

'Kolotoumba': The New Greek Word for Hope

The Greek word “kolotoumba,” or somersault, indicative of a complete reversal in one’s thinking or policies, has become the new catchphrase of the Greek political scene, repeatedly trumpeted in the local media as well as the foreign press.

Greece’s newly elected, radical-left Prime Minister, Alexis Tsipras, has already performed his first kolotoumba by opting for a coalition with Panos Kammenos of the right-wing Independent Greeks, a party, like Tsipras’s, that is staunchly anti-austerity but that derives from the complete opposite end of the political spectrum.

Yianis Varoufakis, the country’s newly appointed Finance Minister, also did a kolotoumba as he is no longer putting an emphasis on a reduction of the Greek debt by indicating that a lengthening of the repayment terms could be an acceptable alternative.

The European Union also made a kolotoumba of its own as it does not appear to be threatening the new government with ultimatums but, rather, encouraging a new dialogue in the hope of finding a potential consensus.

Alexis Tsipras performed another kolotoumba by putting aside his pre-election promises to restore public sector salaries to their pre-crisis levels, rehire all dismissed civil servants and do away with the crippling taxes imposed by previous administrations, merely promising to raise the minimum wage and restore electricity to the country’s impoverished.

By Sunday evening, Tsipras, the leader of the radical-left Syriza party who triumphed in Greece’s national elections by claiming 149 seats in the Greek Parliament, only two shy of an outright majority, started the kolotoumbas and his European partners quickly followed, making the word the key when it comes to the subject of the country’s future in the eurozone.

The Europeans are seeking a new deal with Tsipras in order to keep Greece within the group. Although Germany insists that Greece must adhere to its debt obligations, other voices in the European Union are musing about the possibility of an elongation in the repayment of the country’s debt in order to make it viable for the crippled Greek economy.

Even Jeroen Dijsselbloem
, the stern chairman of the Eurogroup, has stated that although there is minimal support for any debt write-off negotiations, there will be discussions on the issue. And, even the hard-line Prime Minister of Finland and the Finance Minister of Belgium have left open the possibility of extending or reducing Greece’s debt load.

Yanis Varoufakis, who was adamant in his pre-election discourses, at times even discussing a potential return to the Drachma for the country, told the BBC that a “Grexit is not on the cards; we are not going to Brussels and to Frankfurt and to Berlin in confrontational style..” and indicated that there is great potential for a mutually beneficial solution to be found.

Of course, all discussions are premature at this stage as the situation is very fluid in the country. The people, tired and humiliated after five years of recession, with unemployment at 26 percent of the population and at 50 percent among its young, with a large exodus of talented Greeks going abroad in the quest of a job and with 2.5 millions Greeks subsisting below poverty thresholds, voted massively for Alexis Tsipras, providing him with a solid mandate to negotiate an end to the country’s harsh austerity measures.

On the other hand, the new Prime Minister, along with his associate in government, Panos Kammenos, has the delicate task of concluding a new loan agreement with his European partners while also maintaining a tough fiscal line in order to keep the budget balanced or, in the least, not let it exceed the European benchmark of three percent of GDP.

At the same time, the boisterous leftists in Syriza are pushing Tsipras to deliver on his pre-election promises, pledges that would dramatically increase the deficit, while Kammenos remains rather skeptical to any such ideas.

The various conflicts within Syriza, with its hodgepodge mix of radical and extreme-radical leftists and more moderate socialists, and those within the new governmental alliance, foreshadow difficult days ahead for the people of Greece who voted for change and relief but want to remain in a united Europe. Perhaps, from here on in, hope in Europe’s future may be spelled k-o-l-o-t-o-u-m-b-a!