How The University Of Michigan Is Bringing Mental Health Care To Its Student Athletes

Will Heininger, a sport management major at the University of Michigan, was living what was supposed to be a dream. He was playing football for UM, a school that shapes the entire character of Ann Arbor, the city where Heininger grew up. But at 19, he found himself struggling with depression — not that he knew to call it that, at the time. What he knew was that he had “no motivation” and could find “no pleasure in anything,” as he would later describe it.

“It’s wonderful to play a sport collegiately, but only if it’s a positive experience in your life,” Heininger told The Huffington Post last week.

Ultimately, his athletic trainer realized that Heininger was struggling and set him up with a therapist.

“My life went from 100 to zero, and then to better than ever after getting help and understanding what depression is and how common it is,” Heininger said.

Heininger graduated in 2011. Three years later, he returned to UM to help develop Athletes Connected, a program that helps guide the school’s athletes to any mental health resources they may need.

Athletes Connected was created this past spring after the NCAA awarded the university an Innovations in Research and Practice Grant to create a “model program for supporting the mental health of student athletes.” The program is a collaboration between the university’s School of Public Health, its Athletic Department and its Depression Center, which specializes in depression research.

Although college athletes tend to receive good physical care, their mental well-being is not always seen as a priority.

“It’s not that student athletes have more significant issues with mental health,” Barbara Hansen, a social worker in athletics at UM, told HuffPost. Rather, she said, it’s that they don’t take advantage of the available resources at the same rates as other students.

“There is a concern for their status on the team and their playing time. Some of them worry that if they reveal what people think of as a weakness, that might hurt their chances for playing,” said Daniel Eisenberg, a researcher from the UM School of Public Health who serves as faculty principal investigator for Athletes Connected. There’s a feeling, he said, that as an athlete, “it’s important to be tough and figure things out on one’s own.”

Approximately one-third of college students experience a mental health issue at some point, according to a study led by Eisenberg and published in 2013. However, only 10 percent of student athletes with depression or anxiety take advantage of mental health resources — as compared to 30 percent of students overall, according to a study by the Healthy Minds Network, a research group of which Eisenberg is director.

When they don’t get the help they need, athletes tend to suffer on the field. In a 2014 survey by Athletes Connected, 63 percent of student athletes at UM reported that emotional or mental health issues had affected their athletic performance in the past month.

“A lot of what [Athletes Connected is] doing … is essentially trying to disseminate information and provide education, to make sure that student athletes are aware of the services and resources they can use to address mental health, and try to help them become more comfortable discussing mental health-related issues with their peers, athletic trainers or coaches,” said Eisenberg.

Athletes Connected consists of three components: presentations made to all the school’s teams, with coaches present; brief videos, including one featuring Heininger; and voluntary support groups.

“As athletes, we spend our lives trying to beat the current,” Kally Fahee, a UM alum and swimmer who experienced bulimia in college, says in another video.

These personal stories are the unique cornerstone of Athletes Connected. After UM teams watch the videos, Fahee and Heininger have a casual conversation with the athletes, answering any questions they might have.

“That was, in my opinion, the most valuable part,” Heininger told HuffPost, noting that students are more comfortable opening up with him and Fahee present.

Athletes Connected also teaches students how to identify mental issues for their classmates. And in addition to diagnosable mental illness, the program offers resources on perspective and coping mechanisms for stress and techniques for how to manage busy schedules.

So far, the group’s efforts seem to be making a difference.

“I have never been so busy in this position,” said Hansen, describing a recent deluge of students scheduling appointments with counselors. Just as the growing numbers of sexual assault reports nationwide isn’t a sign that sexual assaults themselves are on the rise, an uptick in students meeting with mental health counselors doesn’t mean that more people are suddenly having problems. It just means more people are seeking help.

Mental health among college athletes is starting to become a widely discussed topic. In 2013, the neurologist Brian Hainline became the first chief medical officer of the NCAA. Hainline suffered from depression while a student athlete at the University of Notre Dame, according to The Wall Street Journal.

This past October, Hainline distributed a booklet about student athletes and mental health to about 1,100 college athletic directors. The following month, Ohio State University football player Kosta Karageorge, 22, was found dead in a dumpster, having apparently taken his own life. Karageorge’s death intensified conversations about the importance of paying attention to student athletes’ mental health.

Other schools, such as Emory University and Washington State University, are also working to prioritize the mental health of student athletes. But, Eisenberg found, there is limited available data about how to effectively run a mental health program for college communities — and less data still for programs specific to student athletes.

Somewhat unusually for a university, UM has in-house counseling staff as part of its athletic department. Hansen said this makes things more convenient and more comfortable for student athletes seeking help.

“We want [athletes] to know that this is something that happens to people,” she told HuffPost. “When it happens, here’s what you can do for yourself. And there doesn’t have to be shame around it, because it’s just like a medical injury.”

In the coming year, Athletes Connected has plans to refine its program and expand on a national scale. Other colleges and high schools have already reached out to ask how they can adopt similar programs, according to Hansen and Heininger. The videos have been screened in many colleges and high schools, and Heininger also gives talks in person.

“We don’t claim to have a secret formula,” Heininger told HuffPost. “We just know this issue is important, and [we] want to continue to work on it.”

Ideal Body Types Through History Could Teach Us All Something About Women's Bodies

The “ideal” woman’s body type has taken on a number of forms over the past 3,000 years. In ancient Egypt, it was slender shoulders and a narrow waist; during the Italian Renaissance, it was a round stomach and fair skin; in the 1980s, it was an athletic build with curves.

Buzzfeed compiled these trends and more into one video titled “Women’s Ideal Body Types Throughout History.” The video shows a variety of archetypes through the years, and how those archetypes were directly influenced by society, art and media — thus proving the notion “ideal” is constantly in flux.

“We intended to compare these idealized figures in an editorial fashion that evaluates the aesthetic of each era while displaying how much and how often these standards of beauty change over time,” Eugene Lee Yang, a video producer at Buzzfeed and co-creator of this particular video, told The Huffington Post in an email Wednesday.

Yang and his co-creators received thousands of comments on YouTube and some were quite negative. (Yang even tweeted in response, saying “men can be really, really ugly sometimes.”)

“The key visual component of the video is an objective, diverse showcase of women’s bodies, and that alone sparks a strong reaction,” he told HuffPost. “Many viewers had a poignant response after seeing how ephemeral our concept of ‘the ideal’ is. Other viewers focused solely on the way the models look and missed the point entirely. Case in point: there are some people who can’t get past a woman’s image, and there are others who are able to see and think beyond that.”

Individuals who chose to criticize the models through a twenty-first century lens may have missed an important message: every body type has at some point been “ideal,” and every body type is beautiful.

“We’re so often preoccupied with current trends that we lose perspective on how fleeting our obsession with physical perfection has historically been,” Yang said. “As demanding as our perception of an ideal body type may be, we should remember that yesterday’s ideal will, without fail, evolve into something completely different tomorrow.”

Climate Change in Context; Science, Policy, Political Will, and Commitment

It’s been an interesting week for putting climate change in context. “Context” in this case means the weaving together of science, policy, political will, and commitments. (“Context” is derived from Latin contexere “to weave together”.)

Last Friday in a joint webcast, NOAA and NASA presented their independently derived findings that 2014 was Earth’s warmest year on record since 1880. Their conclusion is based on high precision, high accuracy instrumental data with high scientific certainty. Sophisticated modeling studies from multiple groups confirm that human activity is largely responsible for recent warming.

In his State of the Union Address on Tuesday, President Obama stated, “no challenge — no challenge — poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change.” Obama pointed to the science, “Now, one year doesn’t make a trend, but this does–14 of the 15 warmest years on record have fallen in the first 15 years of this century.” He called out “folks who try to dodge the evidence by saying ‘we’re not scientists’.” He said, “I know a lot of really good scientists at NASA, and NOAA, and at our major universities. The best scientists in the world are telling us that our activities are changing the climate, and if we do not act forcefully, we’ll continue to see rising oceans, longer, hotter heat waves, dangerous droughts and floods, and massive disruptions that can trigger greater migrations, conflict, and hunger around the globe.” Yep, that’s a pretty good summary of impacts and vulnerabilities.

On Wednesday, The US Senate voted overwhelming (98-1) to approve an amendment affirming that “climate change is real and not a hoax.” OK, our policy makers are finally–finally–affirming the science. That’s a big step. Even Senator “global warming is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people” Inhof (R, OK) voted in favor of the motion. Inhofe did however assert it was “arrogant” to suggest that humans are so “powerful” that “they can change climate.”

As a point of clarification, our senators didn’t just suddenly jump on the known-science information train. Democratic senators forced their Republican counterparts to take a stand on the science. The amendment was attached to legislation aimed at forcing a vote on the controversial Keystone XL pipeline.

This week, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) opened a web portal for countries to submit their commitments for the upcoming December UN climate conference in Paris (COP 21). We will now begin to see which countries intend to make aggressive steps toward reaching a global agreement for climate action and which countries will likely play the role of ‘obstructionist’ in Paris.

The science is conclusive, our planet is warming and we as humans are responsible. In the face of mounting scientific evidence, US policy makers can no longer hide behind scientific uncertainty or claim lack of scientific literacy as an excuse for inaction. Holdouts will still try to hang on to the “But, we are not responsible for warming” defense in order to continue leveraging fossil fuels as a cheap way to make money in the short term.

What can you do? Contact your US legislators in the House and the Senate. Tell them it is time to act. Climate change is a civilization challenging issue that requires a global consensus and legal obligation to act. Demand that our country put commitments on the table now for the upcoming UN climate conference in Paris. If the US leads, the rest of the world will follow.

America's Tax System Is Widely Seen As Favoring The Rich, Poll Shows

Americans largely think the current tax system favors the wealthy and needs to be reformed, but not very many expect to be personally affected by President Barack Obama’s proposed reforms, a new HuffPost/YouGov poll finds.

The vast majority of Democrats, Republicans and independents said they agree that Congress should pass legislation in the next year to reform taxes. A full 88 percent said tax reform is at least somewhat important, with 44 percent calling the subject “very important.”

More than 60 percent said the tax system currently favors the wealthy over the middle class and poor, and just a combined 22 percent that the system favors the non-wealthy or treats everyone equally.

A majority in every income bracket agreed the system is biased toward the rich, although those in households making less than $40,000 a year were 8 points more likely to agree than were those making over $80,000 a year. The more prominent divide, though, was along party lines: 80 percent of Democrats and just 40 percent of Republicans said the wealthy benefit more.

Most Americans see an ideal system as one where everyone is treated the same. Sixty-one percent said the system should treat everyone equally, while 32 percent say America’s tax system should favor the middle class and poor over the wealthy.


Chart created using Datawrapper

But a majority doubt they would see much change from President Barack Obama’s plan to raise capital gains taxes on the wealthy while offering new tax breaks for college students and working families. Just 24 percent said it would directly help their family, while 15 percent said they think it would hurt.

While the president touted the proposal as tax relief for the middle class, Americans at all income levels had similar responses. Many said they didn’t expect to see any effects, including 47 percent of those making less than $40,000 a year, 42 percent of those making between $40,000 and $80,000, and 42 percent of those making more than $80,000. Those at the lowest income levels were least likely to anticipate a personal effect.

Americans under 30, who are more likely to be thinking about college, were the most enthusiastic, with 39 percent saying the measures would help. Just 5 percent over age 65 said the same.

Partisanship was also a factor — while a majority of both parties said they thought the proposal would have no effect or they were unsure, Democrats were far more likely to think it would help than hurt, while the Republicans who anticipated any effects said, by a 2-to-1 ratio, that they would be negative.

The muted reaction to Obama’s proposed tax reform places it in good company with other economic proposals. About half or more of Americans also say they wouldn’t be affected by policies including a minimum wage hike, equal pay for women, funding for child care, debt reduction or fewer business regulations.

The HuffPost/YouGov poll consisted of 1,000 completed interviews conducted Jan. 21-23 among U.S. adults using a sample selected from YouGov’s opt-in online panel to match the demographics and other characteristics of the adult U.S. population.

The Huffington Post has teamed up with YouGov to conduct daily opinion polls. You can learn more about this project and take part in YouGov’s nationally representative opinion polling. Data from all HuffPost/YouGov polls can be found here. More details on the poll’s methodology are available here.

Elementary Teachers Under Fire After Forcing 'Poop Inspections' On Students

When officials at an elementary school in Gustine, Texas, kept finding poop on the gym floor, they decided to get to the bottom of the matter.

But their method of investigation has parents and students raising a stink.

On Monday, officials at Gustine Elementary rounded up 24 students, and divided them up by gender. Then the kids were ordered to pull down their pants far enough so educators could see if there were any tell-tale fecal stains.

Eliza Medina, 11, was embarrassed by the “poop inspection.”

“I felt uncomfortable, and I didn’t want to do it,” Eliza Medina, 11, told WFAA TV. “I felt like they violated my privacy.”

Eliza’s mom, Marina Medina, said that she understands how frustrating feces on the floor can be, but it isn’t any excuse to partially strip search students.

“I was furious… I mean, I was furious,” Medina said, according to KHOU TV. “If you can’t do your job or you don’t know what you’re doing, you need to be fired. You shouldn’t be here.”

Gustine Independent School District Superintendent Ken Baugh is investigating the matter in hopes of getting the story straight. He said his understanding was that children were told to lower their pants just a little.

Eliza Medina said the “poop inspections” went further. “Like… to where your butt is,” is how she phrased it, according to the Washington Times.

Baugh hopes to have the investigation wrapped up by Thursday’s school board meeting, where some angry parents are expected to give officials a lot of crap.

@media only screen and (min-width : 500px) {.ethanmobile { display: none; }}

Like Us On Facebook |
Follow Us On Twitter |
Contact The Author

Cash or Credit — Which Is the Smarter Way to Pay?

Dear Carrie,

I’m trying to rein in our family’s spending and wondering if my husband and I rely too much on credit cards. We pay off our balance every month, but somehow I think that credit cards make it too easy to buy things we don’t really need. Am I being old-fashioned?

— A Reader

Dear Reader,

Rather than being old fashioned, I think your question is right on target. Especially with the new one-touch payment methods such as Apple Pay, it’s easier than ever to rely on credit cards.

Add to that the allure of rewards, whether points, miles or cash back, and a lot of people choose to basically charge all their expenses — everything from groceries, gas and clothes to medical bills, insurance and school tuition. This can create some problems because while today’s technology makes it easy and seemingly practical to use our credit cards for everything, when it comes to paying the bill, it still takes money. And that’s where it may pay to be a bit old fashioned.

Don’t get me wrong. Credit cards are convenient and pretty much a necessity for a lot of things we do. The main concern, which is often cited by behavioral economists, is that it seems to be human nature to buy more freely when paying with credit. So you’re right. By relying on credit cards, you may be more likely to either buy things you don’t need or pay more for a particular item.

Interestingly, a colleague of mine was recently recounting how she and her husband decided to go on a cash-only diet to get a handle on their expenses. It was an eye-opening and successful experiment for them — and one that I think might work for you as well. It would certainly help you focus on where your money is going. Here are some ideas on how to go about it.

Dust off your budget
One of the first things to fall by the wayside when we rely on credit cards is a budget. So start there. Using an online budget calculator, sit down with your husband and make a list of all your expenses — essential and discretionary, fixed and variable. Examine what you believe you’ll need to spend each month and how you intend to pay for each expense.

Next, write down everything you buy for a couple of months, noting whether you pay with cash or credit. If you find you regularly spend more each month than you anticipated, your credit card may be the culprit.

Put only fixed expenses on your credit cards
The next step is to decide what’s more practical to buy with credit, and what should be purchased with cash.

Fixed expenses such as insurance, utilities, cable and cell phone bills, even school tuition or regular charitable donations could reasonably be kept on your credit card. There shouldn’t be any surprises with these expenses. And using a card makes it easy to keep on top of those bills and pay them on time.

Withdraw cash monthly to cover your out-of-pocket expenses
Now make the decision to pay for everything else with cash — groceries, gas, entertainment, restaurants, clothes, haircuts, manicures, gifts — all those everyday purchases for which you ordinarily pull out the plastic.

Going back to your budget, determine how much you normally spend on these types of expenses and withdraw that dollar figure in cash at the beginning of the month. You and your husband could each take a certain amount, or you could keep this monthly money in a central location and each draw on it as necessary.

Make a commitment to each other that as the end of the month draws near, instead of pulling out a credit card to cover any shortfall, you’ll stick to your cash allotment and postpone or rethink any purchases that would push you over your budget.

Evaluate your results
With a heightened awareness of each expenditure, you may quite naturally make better spending decisions. My colleague found that in the very first month of their cash-only experiment she and her husband came in under budget. And not only were they more in control of their spending, they were able to refocus on their financial goals and increase their savings.

No matter how you choose to pay for your monthly expenses, the most important point is this: Controlling your spending now will allow you to plan ahead and save for your future security — while also enjoying the day-to-day.

So give it a try. You might find that a few months of paying with cash will give you a savings bonus that is even more rewarding than all those credit card perks.

Looking for answers to your retirement questions? Check out Carrie’s new book, “The Charles Schwab Guide to Finances After Fifty: Answers to Your Most Important Money Questions.”

This article originally appeared on Schwab.com. You can e-mail Carrie at askcarrie@schwab.com, or click here for additional Ask Carrie columns. This column is no substitute for an individualized recommendation, tax, legal or personalized investment advice. Where specific advice is necessary or appropriate, consult with a qualified tax advisor, CPA, financial planner or investment manager.

COPYRIGHT 2015 CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC. MEMBER SIPC. (0115-0663)

Eggs Shaped Like Golf Balls Mean It's Finally OK To Play With Your Food

Eggs Shaped Like Golf Balls Mean It's Finally OK To Play With Your Food

Playing with your food is a real no-no when you’re a kid. But once you’re old enough to head off to college, it suddenly becomes OK—at least if Animal House taught us anything. And OK or not, it’s all but impossible to resist playing around with a boiled egg that’s been molded into the shape of soccer, tennis, and golf balls.

Read more…



Remember When Fax Machines Were the High-Tech Future?

Remember When Fax Machines Were the High-Tech Future?

When was the last time you sent a fax? 2000? 1995? Never and you hardly even know what a fax is because you’re just too young? Fair enough. But the fax machine was the high-tech device of its day. And even in the world of Back to the Future Part II, it plays an important role. Which is probably why it looks so silly to us here in the year 2015.

Read more…



The Silk Road Trial Lawyers Are Fighting Over Emoticons :0

The Silk Road Trial Lawyers Are Fighting Over Emoticons :0

Is there a difference between “Yep” and “Yep :)” when you chat online? Seems like an odd quibble to focus on during the biggest drug trial of the decade, but it’s not trivial. The meaning of internet-speak cuts to the heart of the Silk Road trial.

Read more…



Bill Gates doesn't get why we're not worried about super intelligent AI

Elon Musk and Stephen Hawking have brought up the potential dangers of super intelligent AI several times over the past few years (Musk even donated $10 million toward cautious AI research), but now Bill Gates is also getting into the mix. In his Red…