Miscarriage, the Grief That We Can't Talk About

It’s been more than three years, but there are still flashes that remind me of that day — a song or a word or the way the light falls in a room just so.

Tonight, it’s words that send me back to a bright white room where a baby, my baby, died.

“You give and take away,” these are words that hold sorrow in their hands.

I know what it’s like to be given a treasure. I know what it’s like to have that treasure taken away.

I know what it’s like to stand at the end and wish it was The End.

I know what it’s like to die in the places no one can see.

And it doesn’t matter if she was 12 weeks in a womb or 12 years breathing the air of the world, losing a child all hurts the same.

2015-01-25-HuffPostmiscarriage.jpg

It was a Friday. It was a routine doctor’s appointment on a sunny summer day. It was the “we made it safely” day, according to all the pregnancy books.

There was no blood. There were no cramps. There were no signs that a baby had died wrapped tight in my warm.

There was only a blank screen where a heartbeat had been, where it was supposed to be now, today, because this was the safe day.

They cleaned her from the parts of me that wouldn’t let her go and then wheeled me out of the same place I’d carried three babies in my arms. Except this time, someone else carried her out in a lab jar and those hallways turned ugly and the smooth ride hurt and the whole world went dark.

My husband held me all night, and I woke with a pillow soaked with tears I don’t even remember crying, and all her brothers were knocking on the door because life doesn’t care about a whole world ending. It just goes on.

After the first appointment, where her heartbeat showed strong on a screen, we let ourselves settle into the reality of one more.

We talked about where she would sit in our car and where she would sleep and what kind of room she would have. I picked out the colors I would use to crochet her blanket. I marked the material I’d use for her bibs and dresses and bows.

She was a person, already living in our home.

This is how it happens. We imagine who they will be and how they will fit into our families and whose nose and eyes and hair they will wear.

Before we even meet them, we have already planned their details and we have already seen their faces and we have already embraced them, alive.

And then they are gone, and they will never sit in our car or sleep in that bed or look at the walls of that room we decorated with them in mind.

There is a hole where they used to be, and even though our uterus will shrink again and the blood will taper off and our body will forget it ever carried new life within, we will never forget.

We fly right off the edge in the losing, and it takes time to climb back up.

We don’t talk about it much, we who have been through the horror of losing a baby we never met, but there are many of us out here, spinning to the floor or trying to lift our heads or finally walking out the other side of that crack in a world.

We don’t talk about it because it hurts. We don’t talk about it because we’re afraid that maybe we did something wrong. We don’t talk about it because we should be okay by now, shouldn’t we?

I want to tell you that it’s OK to feel sad and crushed and sick, sick, sick that your baby is the one who slipped away when there are all those others who aren’t wanted or needed or loved and they lived.

It’s OK to grieve.

I want to tell you to take as long as you need to get over this loss, even when “they’re” telling you you’re taking too long and it was only a miscarriage and at least it didn’t happen later when it would have been harder to say goodbye.

“They” usually haven’t been through one and don’t understand that there is no harder goodbye. There is only hard goodbye.

So grieve. Rage. Cry until your stomach hurts and your eyes feel like they’re burning away and you can’t even make another sound.

Keep that sonogram picture, the one that proves she had a heartbeat once upon a time, the one that says she lived. You’ll be glad you did.

It’s hard to see from these days and weeks and months after losing that there is another side to this dark, that one day you will mend this crack in your world and you will run your fingers over that scar and feel stronger and more alive because of it.

You will.

But for now, let the world crack right open. Let the light go out. Fumble around in the darkness until your eyes adjust and you see the flicker of a candle glowing in a corner, waiting for another day.

And then, only when you feel ready, crawl toward that day, because it is still waiting. Let love walk you right back out.

Stay down as long as you need, as long as it takes. And then lift that weary head, so much stronger than you knew, and overcome.

The tiny ones we’ve lost are remembered here, too, in the overcoming.

This post first appeared on Rachel Toalson. Follow Rachel on Twitter.

After Ebola: Why Rural Development Matters in a Time of Crisis

To date, the spread of Ebola in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone has sickened more than 21,000 people and claimed over 8,600 lives. According to the World Health Organization, it is the largest such epidemic ever recorded. But recently, a ray of hope emerged. United Nations Special Envoy Dr. David Nabarro said the spread of Ebola in West Africa was finally slowing down as a result of changes in burial practices and other behaviors that had previously driven the outbreak.

Although the battle is not yet over, this is wonderful news. Now we must begin to look at what happens to the affected communities after Ebola. A food crisis seems increasingly likely to follow in the wake of the epidemic, which has devastated small-scale farmers. Without investment in their long-term development, farming households – and West Africa’s future food security – will remain at risk.

Even before the outbreak, the World Food Programme estimated that some 1.7 million people in the region faced food insecurity – defined as a lack of reliable access to sufficient quantities of affordable, nutritious food. As a direct result of Ebola, it is expected that an additional 750,000 to 1.4 million people will become food-insecure by March.

In fact, Ebola has already affected the food supply. Farmers have stayed away from their fields due to illness, fears of infection and quarantines ordered by the authorities – or simply because there is no one left to tend the land. Trade has been blocked by the shutdown of market centers and borders to prevent contagion. Food systems, already fragile in the best of times, have been failing.

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) reports that disproportionate numbers of economically active women and men have been infected across West Africa. In Sierra Leone, UNDP says per capita incomes have plummeted as a result of lost income, including earnings from smallholder farming. Microfinance programmes are being undermined due to non-payment of loans by participants, including women farmers and rural entrepreneurs, who have fallen ill or suffered financial losses from Ebola. These defaults could lead to a regional credit squeeze, further compromising production by farmers who must borrow during planting season to buy seeds and other inputs.

Such dire circumstances should spur action. First, the international community must redouble its efforts to entirely stop the spread of Ebola and ensure that the immediate food crisis in West Africa does not escalate into a full-blown disaster. Then we need to support sustained, long-term development efforts in the places where smallholder farmers live and work.

More than three-quarters of the globe’s poorest people live in the rural areas of developing countries. Their world has been largely invisible to Western eyes and media. These areas are vulnerable to shocks and crises precisely because they are already close to the edge, with little or nothing to fall back on. It is time for the developed, visible world to understand that unless rural communities become more resilient, we will be reduced to treating the symptoms rather than the disease of poverty.

From a global perspective, these communities play a vital role in ensuring food security. They are home to 500 million smallholder family farms that provide up to four-fifths of the food supply in the developing world. We are now seeing just how quickly disease can put that supply under threat.

Anyone who doubts this point has only to look at the trajectory of Ebola. As long as it mainly affected remote rural Africa, it received little attention. However, viruses do not respect provincial or national borders, and this one spread rapidly from rural to urban areas. With the appearance of several confirmed Ebola cases in Europe and the United States last fall, and more recently in Scotland, the whole world trembled.

But we can break the cycle of poverty, hunger and instability by investing seriously in rural development. Given the requisite tools and resources, small-scale agricultural producers and rural entrepreneurs can transform their communities into thriving places that offer decent livelihoods.

I have seen it with my own eyes, time and again, on field visits to projects financed by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) and our many partners. Financing for roads, electricity, running water, banks, schools and health clinics can improve life immeasurably for the 3 billion people who live in rural areas. Indeed, if West Africa had a more developed level of rural services and infrastructure, it is unlikely that the Ebola epidemic would have spread, virtually unchecked, for so long.

Investing in rural men, women and children is what institutions like IFAD do every day. But there must be a significant increase in both resources and political will. Governments, development agencies, the private sector and others all have roles to play. With long-term rural investment, we can shift from a crisis-to-crisis approach by taking measures that sustainably reduce poverty, ensure food security and promote social development in vulnerable communities.

Not only is this the right thing to do, it is also in everyone’s interest. Our world is global. What happens in Conakry, Freetown or Monrovia is felt in Berlin, Hong Kong, New York and beyond. We can no longer afford to treat rural people as if they were invisible. It’s time to open our eyes.

How Comcast's Political Machine Is Manipulating (And Impersonating) You

How Comcast's Political Machine Is Manipulating (And Impersonating) You

Did you know that Comcast ghostwrites endorsement letters from politicians to the Federal Communications Commission about its awful merger with Time Warner Cable? Like, a Comcast flack literally puts words in local leaders’ mouths and then uses them as evidence that America likes this merger.

Read more…



Giant Circular Panorama Recreates The Hell of Fire-bombed Dresden

Giant Circular Panorama Recreates The Hell of Fire-bombed Dresden

Seventy years ago, in one of the most controversial actions of World War Two, the British Royal Air Force (RAF) and the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) dropped circa 4000 tons of high-explosive bombs and incendiary devices on Dresden. Only months before the end of World War II, in four fierce raids between 13 and 15 February the allied bombers obliterated over 1,600 acres (6.5 km2) of the historic city center, and the bombing and the resulting firestorm killed at least 25,000 German people.

Read more…



Dropcam will give you a free replacement camera if yours is too old

Normally, companies don’t do much for you when they stop supporting a device. They’ll give you a too-bad-so-sad notice and ask you to buy their latest gear. Not Dropcam, however. The Nest-owned company is ditching support for both its original home s…

WikiLeaks furious at Google for keeping government data request a secret

Google is catching some heat from WikiLeaks after the company revealed that it handed over emails and other data on three WikiLeaks employees to the US government. Obviously, that in and of itself would be enough to ruffle the feathers of the activis…

Law Enforcement Thinks Waze’s Police Alerts Are A Threat To Their Safety

waze-policeOne of the nifty features of Waze is its ability to help find you the best route that has the least traffic. It also has the ability to allow users to warn other users of upcoming speed cameras, road blocks or police sightings so that users will slow down if they want to avoid getting pulled over, but unfortunately this is a feature that law enforcement officials aren’t too pleased with.

Speaking to the Associated Press (via Engadget), these police officers believe that Waze’s police finding feature would make it too easy for would-be cop killers to find their targets. It would essentially be putting them on the map for everyone to find. To that extent they are hoping that Google (who owns Waze) will take this under serious consideration and disable the feature.

However the issue here is that the feature relies on crowdsourced data, so unless Waze were to disable the sharing of information entirely, we reckon it would be pretty hard to discourage users to not share where they see police that might be parked by the side of the road, or could have setup road blocks to catch drunk drivers or speedsters.

Disabling the feature would also make Waze lose one of its unique features, but at the same time given the recent spate of police-targeted killings, it is understandable that law enforcement officials are starting to become a bit more sensitive to these kinds of things.

Law Enforcement Thinks Waze’s Police Alerts Are A Threat To Their Safety , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Sony Xperia Z4 Might Skip MWC, Launch In The Summer Instead [Rumor]

sony-xperia-z3-z3v-review-05With Sony passing up the opportunity to launch their next flagship smartphone at CES 2015 earlier this month, we can only assume that they will take advantage of MWC 2015 to launch the Sony Xperia Z4, however if the recent rumors are to be believed, that might not even be happening either.

The folks at Xperia Blog have heard from their sources that Sony might not be announcing the Xperia Z4 at MWC 2015. Instead it seems that Sony might be choosing to launch their next-gen flagship smartphone in the summer, although we’re not sure why this is the case. However assuming the summer release is true, it does line up with an earlier rumor we had last year.

Back in 2014 we had heard that Sony wanted to release one flagship smartphone a year, as opposed to two phones a year, and with a summer release, it would certainly seem that way. Previously Sony had the habit of releasing one flagship phone at the start of the year, followed by another flagship model in the later part of the year.

This strategy would basically be similar to what companies such as HTC and Apple are doing, but at the same time it would undoubtedly mean that Sony would have to cede market share to its competitors, unless of course their flagship is impressive enough where customers will actually hold out for it, but in any case MWC kicks off next month so perhaps we will learn more then. In the meantime would you be disappointed if we don’t hear about the Sony Xperia Z4 at MWC?

Sony Xperia Z4 Might Skip MWC, Launch In The Summer Instead [Rumor] , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Sony Mobile Wants To Extend The Life Cycle Of Their Handsets

sony-xperia-z3-z3v-review-12Last year we heard that Sony in a bid to help cut its costs would be trimming its smartphone portfolio. We had also heard that Sony would be releasing one flagship smartphone a year as opposed to two, where typically it had been a launch at CES/MWC, followed by another flagship smartphone launch in the later part of the year (think Sony Xperia Z, followed by the Xperia Z1).

Well it looks like those rumors could be true. Speaking at a media briefing, Sony Mobile’s General Manager of their Taiwan branch, Jonathan Lim, told the media that the company has plans of streamlining their products in 2015, cutting it down from the 9 models that they launched last year. The company plans on focusing more on mid-tier to high-end phones, as well as extending their product life cycle.

According to Lim, “Our current strategy is on how to extend product life cycle, for which we plan to offer more mobile content and new color phones.” Lim also cites the launch of the purple Xperia Z2 in March last year as a success, which might explain why the company has chosen to refresh the Xperia Z3 lineup with a purple model.

Lim’s statement also seems to be in line with an earlier rumor which suggested that Sony could be passing up the opportunity to launch the Xperia Z4 at MWC 2015, choosing instead to launch it in the summer.

Sony Mobile Wants To Extend The Life Cycle Of Their Handsets , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Snowmageddon NYC 2015: 10 things in tech you mustn’t forget

snowmageddonIt’s a real-deal state of emergency right now in New York and surrounding areas – a blizzard is dropping this week – so much so that you may need a guide to get you through it. Accumulation of snow will reach 20 to 30 inches in Long Island and Connecticut, while visibility will be one quarter mile or less at … Continue reading