Microsoft's Surface tablet and Xbox businesses are (mostly) booming

Microsoft appears to be well past the days when it was writing off unsold Surface tablets and struggling to match Sony in game console sales. The Windows developer reports that its Devices and Consumer group’s revenue grew 8 percent year over year in…

Microsoft Q2 2015 earnings: Xbox down, Surface & Lumia up

microsoft-820x4201-600x307-600x307Microsoft has released their Q2 2015 earning report, which show the company had $26.5 billion in revenue with $5.8 billion in net income. That’s an 8% uptick in revenue over last year, but an even greater loss in income (10%). Part of that has to do with their purchase of Nokia, for which Microsoft is claiming $243 million in “integration ans … Continue reading

Action/2015: The Importance of 15

Over the past few years, we’ve heard a lot about the new rules that millennials are writing for work and communication, and many of us have admired their idealism, fresh thinking, entrepreneurialism and ability to shake things up.

Now there’s a new generation that’s equally exciting–Generation Z, as some have taken to calling young people born around or after the turn of the millennium. They don’t remember 9/11, yet its aftermath has been their lifelong reality. They never lived without the Internet, and smartphones were invented before they became old enough to care what they were. They were in elementary school when they saw the havoc wreaked by the global recession.

2015-01-26-logo_crisp1.png

And yet they have the optimism and energy to make the world a better place. I was reminded of this as my agency, Havas PR, began work to help launch the action/2015 campaign, which is aimed at eliminating poverty and tackling climate change. It got under way recently as thousands of organizations and world leaders welcomed the initiative, including UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who was joined by a group of 15-year-olds. The age 15 is no coincidence: action/2015, led by civil society, is unfolding at a time when the world is talking about a new set of global development goals, and these kids are the same age as the UN’s landmark Millennium Development Goals, which have helped lift millions from poverty.

Fifteen-year-olds are influential in so many ways. Now that we’ve collectively agreed to see 30 as the beginning of adulthood, 15 is halfway there. Smack in the middle of teenager-dom, 15-year-olds are the people writing the rules for life as a teenager circa 2015. And 2015 is itself a turning-point year: Suddenly it feels as if we’re far enough into this new century that we can look backward and forward.

It’s too easy to say that we’re just looking forward and that children are our future. It’s been said before: Children are not the future; they are the present. That’s why action/2015, along with other initiatives that advocate for, create and support a new development framework and climate agreement, is gathering a coalition of 15-year-olds around the globe. Their goal–and that of the thousands of organizations participating in action/2015 through an umbrella of subgroups–is no less ambitious than to end poverty by the time they become adults, in 2030.

It’s also easy to dismiss that dream as the idealism of young people who haven’t been exposed to the realities of working life. Don’t. Maher Nasser of the UN Department of Public Information recently said: “This coalition will help push forward sustainable habits. The goal is to protect the planet and provide dignity. It is going to be a slow process but will be able to make an impact.”

Social media is, of course, a key element in the coalition. Its tools will engage the public and allow everyone to rethink how the approach is measured. The organizations involved are able to share information through in-person meetings, task groups, PSAs and, significantly, a common Web platform. Who better to navigate these things than the generation who never knew life without them?

Action/2015 isn’t just summits and virtual and internal communications. It includes a stirring call to action to the public. The campaign will be driven through mass public mobilizations, creative products, events, films and concerts, all aimed at letting the world know about this critical moment in history. It doesn’t want to reinvent policy but amplify existing initiatives, helping to build a bigger, broader movement demanding decisive and ambitious action to tackle the root causes of inequality, poverty and climate change.

Young people will be at the forefront of the campaign, calling on world leaders to secure the future–not just because they have a big personal stake in it, but also because this generation is uniquely poised to inspire the rest of us.

Jerusalem: To Be No Longer Welcome

I am asked if I have ever been, and I must take a moment to remember. I take a moment to consider, what does it matter if I have ever been if I can never go back? This pause takes longer than expected, because the instant I hear “Jerusalem,” confusion jolts through my veins. The instant I hear “Jerusalem,” my mind returns, robotically, “I’ll never go back.” My heart whispers, “I’m always there.” My throat begins to burn as the two go to war inside of me. The voice in my heart escalates but no matter how loudly it screams my mind does not accept and it still repeats — “I’ll never go back.” I come to the end of this short pause, emotions nearly exploding off my tongue.

I then only meekly reply, “Yes, I went when I was a child.”

… But I can never go back.

Yes, I have memories of Jerusalem. Memories that will forever remain broken. Glimpses and snapshots that exist only as unfinished stories. All because I’m Palestinian, because I’m from Gaza.

I remember sitting on the bright red carpet in the Dome of the Rock, watching others bow their heads down to its golden patterns. I gazed up to the open expanse inside. Even the molecules in the air seemed to be saturated with divinity. I remember touching the great stone that the Prophet Muhammad is said to have stood on. I recall Jerusalem’s buzzing markets, piled with children’s clothes, lanterns, and souvenirs. Stray cats running around the courtyards, and kids chasing along after. These faded pictures I have, part of a painting I can never complete. Yet, the moment I left Jerusalem as a child, I engrained the city in my heart.

On Sept. 28, 2000, I heard news about violence just outside of the great mosque, whose carpet I laid on only weeks before. I clearly visualized it all again, and as a child, I thought about was the idea of its beautiful red and gold patterns being tarnished and destroyed. I cried. Understandably, my parents did not go into much more detail about what happened. Later I learned that this had been the beginning of the Second Intifada, but despite its origins in Jerusalem, most of the violence ended up occurring elsewhere. My fear for Jerusalem subsided, and for the next several years, my concerns would be occupied by atrocities elsewhere in Palestine.

Thus, as I grew up, one thing was always sure to me: despite the chaos in the West Bank and Gaza, Jerusalem was a sphere of Palestine that could not be penetrated by much of the chaos surrounding it. My mind was mainly consumed by the Gaza Strip most of the time, where I have the most family. I saw their suffering. I experienced the destruction and blockade of Gaza for myself. No matter how many more drones I saw over Gaza, though, or how many more Israeli settlements I heard of in the West Bank, a part of me always remained at peace knowing that Jerusalem was safe.

Well, as safe as an illegally occupied territory could be. Maybe I was not paying enough attention, or I was too young to see it. Maybe because the reports I did hear out of Jerusalem, while shocking to those privileged with life in the West, seemed routine to the Palestinian struggle. Whatever the reason, I was in no way prepared for what plummeted through Jerusalem’s once impenetrable dome during the year 2014. Nor was any other Palestinian I knew.

I sat before my laptop in the summer of 2014, questioning my eyes for what they told me was written on the screen. I spent hours glued to social media, simultaneously checking live news updates from Jerusalem, and scrambling to contact all those I knew with family there. My mind could not escape this beloved city from 14 years earlier, and each day, I became more and more aware of something leaving my heart forever. The security by which I was once sustained collapsed underneath me, and with it I felt the weight of twelve million sunken Palestinian hearts crashing onto my back. Jerusalem, a city that, no matter where we all come from, holds our deepest roots of love and hope, was, too, infiltrated with wickedness. “Even worse than 1967,” many said, “the worst I’ve ever seen it.”

This is my story with Jerusalem — once only unsure of my fate to return to the city, now unsure of the fate of the city, itself, as one to return to.

How is it that I am so concerned about a city that I can hardly even remember?

Jerusalem, your air is filled with the prayers of countless languages. Your soil is imprinted by the footsteps of many empires, and the world’s heritages intersect to compose your history. Jerusalem, your place in my heart transcends sight and experience. Abraham walked on your ground. Jesus ministered to your people. Muhammad ascended into your skies.

Why do the walls that were once built to protect Jerusalem’s majesty, now stand to destroy? Is it not a home to us all? Do we each not have our story? So why are we being persecuted based on religion, ethnicity, and nationality? Why does our children’s blood stain the streets where peace was once preached?

If this grand city is so much a part of me, what is this authority that prevents me from being a part of it? If my people, too, can trace our ancestry through the roots of its olive trees, why then, can we not return?

Head Start: Embracing a Two Generation Approach to Early Learning

When Head Start was launched in 1965, at its core was the idea that families and communities were integral to supporting children’s successful early learning and development. Fifty years later, Head Start continues to lead in two generational approaches, always emphasizing that parents — as their children’s first teachers — are a program’s most important partners.

Head Start and Early Head Start programs in diverse communities across the country have pioneered new and innovative designs for whole-family approaches that are tailored to their community’s distinct needs. Thanks to reliable federal funding that allows for local flexibility, Head Start programs have built partnerships with colleges, workforce agencies, banks, employers, foundations, hospitals, state agencies, and more, establishing a two-generation infrastructure for success in their communities.

Two Generations Together, a report recently released by the National Head Start Association in partnerships with Ascend at the Aspen Institute, highlights the exceptional efforts of several Head Start programs in designing effective whole family approaches that address their community’s unique needs, while focusing on engaging both children and their parents. From the College Access and Success program in Manhattan’s Lower East Side to the Live and Learn CDA Credentialing program in Phoenix, the programs featured in the report exemplify the transformative power of two-generation solutions that stabilize whole families for generations to come.

The Head Start programs detailed in the report include AVANCE-Houston; Educational Alliance in New York City; Pacific Clinics in Pasadena; Friends of Children of Mississippi in Jackson; Parents in Community Action (PICA) in Minneapolis; and Southwest Human Development in Phoenix. The case studies in this report reinforce the value of Head Start’s longstanding two-generational approach to achieving stability and success.

AVANCE-Houston Inc, for example, serves over 3,0000 children each day in northwest Harris County, Texas. Their two-generation vision is rooted in the Parent Child Education Program (PCEP) which has several interlocking components including early childhood through Head Start, adult education, computer literacy, marriage and parenting support, and a myriad of other resources supported by community partners. Research shows that over 40 years of implementation of the PCEP model, 90% of children have gone on to graduate high school and parents have improved their employment and increased home ownership.

Decades of research prove that children’s outcomes are deeply related to family context, which is why every Head Start and Early Head Start family works with an advocate who helps parents conduct a family needs assessment and create a partnership agreement that lays out goals for both children and parents. Whether they are immediate needs like safe housing and getting food on the table, or long-term aspirations for college degrees and fulfilling careers, these goals empower families to achieve educational success as well as economic security.

While Head Start has long recognized the importance of a whole child and whole family model, new national awareness has led to increased attention, funding, policy, and research around two-generation efforts. Americans across demographics and on both sides of the aisle overwhelmingly believe a two-generation approach to early learning is the most effective way to lift families out of poverty. According to a recent report released by the Aspen Institute, 84% of Americans agree that Head Start and Early Head Start should partner with organizations that help the parents of low-income children further their education and receive job training.

As Head Start celebrates its 50th anniversary year, we must continue to embrace policies that support the proven two-generation efforts that have been fundamental to the comprehensive Head Start model since its conception.

A Timeline Of Events Since The ‘Serial' Premiere

Part of the strange intimacy of “Serial” comes from the knowledge that the murder-mystery at the podcast’s heart took place in the real world.

Redefining Business Purpose: Driving Societal and Systems Transformation

A Growing Threat

The world faces enormous human development and environmental challenges, from poverty and disease to food security and climate change. Significant progress has been made in the last two decades — extreme poverty has halved, hunger has reduced and over two billion people have improved access to drinking water.

But huge problems remain. Inequality has widened, one in eight people still go to bed hungry and climate change threatens everything we have achieved since the 1960s. Half a century of progress stands to be wiped out within a generation.

For too long business has sat on the sidelines, either unable or unwilling to be part of the solution to these systemic challenges. But this is now rapidly changing as the limitations of governments and international bodies to resolve them become ever more apparent, as consumers increasingly are demanding change, and as the cost of inaction starts to exceed the cost of action.

The cost of climate change is already high and increasing. The UN Secretary General has calculated that, since 2000, economic losses from natural disasters total around $2.5 trillion. The OECD predicts that, by 2050, over $45 trillion of assets could be at risk of flooding. Accenture has found that significant supply chain disruptions can cut the share price of companies by 7 percent, whilst KPMG estimates that the total profit of the food industry is at risk by 2030.

We are seeing the effect of climate change in our own business. Shipping routes cancelled because of hurricanes in the Philippines. Factories closing because of extreme cold weather in the United States. Distribution networks in disarray because of floods in the UK. Reduced productivity on our tea plantations in Kenya because of weather changes linked to deforestation of the Mau forest. We estimate that geo-political and climate related factors cost Unilever currently up to €300 million a year. This not only impacts our shareholders but with over five million in our supply chain and more than two billion consumers around the world, the repercussions ripple much wider.

As tackling these issues becomes not just a moral but a commercial imperative, a growing number of businesses are stepping up to the plate. Today, three-quarters of the largest companies have set themselves clear social and environmental goals, 4,000 now report on CO2 emissions, and 50 of the top 200 have set an internal price for carbon.

The Unilever Sustainable Living Plan

Our own response is set out in the Unilever Sustainable Living Plan, which has set stretching goals to reduce our environmental footprint and increase our social impact as we grow our business. We are making progress. All of the electricity for our sites in North America and Europe now comes from certified, renewable sources. In absolute terms, CO2 emissions from energy in manufacturing are nearly a third below 2008 levels, water abstraction is down 29 percent and total waste sent for disposal is down two-thirds — all achieved while increasing production volume. It is making us a more efficient organisation and saving us money — over €300 million in cumulative avoided supply chain costs since 2008.

However, as combating climate change becomes more urgent, the time has come to look beyond incremental reductions in environmental impacts and increases in social impacts, important though these are. Business can and must make a bigger difference to global challenges by leveraging its scale, influence, expertise and resources to drive transformational change at a systemic level.

This is crucial because the economic system we all live and work within, drive our behaviours and choices, and without changing them we cannot hope to achieve the structural shifts that have to be made. Business is responsible for more than half the world’s GDP, so unless we make change happen, we will not see the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) the world needs.

The Better Growth, Better Climate Report, published in 2014 by the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, of which I was a member, identified three key systems of the economy where there is huge potential to invest in structural and technological change: Cities, which generate around 80 percent of global output and 70 percent of global energy use and related GHG emissions; energy systems, where renewables and energy efficiency offer significant investment opportunities; and land use. Food production can be increased and land use emissions cut through more sustainable agricultural practices and by protecting forests from further destruction.

Over half of Unilever’s raw materials come from farms and forests. That is why we have committed to work with others and to champion sustainable agriculture in areas where we have most influence, to help smallholder farmers to improve their farming practices and livelihoods, and to eliminate deforestation from supply chains.

We also make and market some of the world’s leading personal hygiene and household cleaning products, so we have also committed to help provide good hygiene, safe drinking water and better sanitation for the millions of people around the world who are still denied these basic human rights. All three commitments are directly relevant to our business. All three respond to pressing societal needs.

This is not about mitigation. It is about opportunity and aligning our purpose in business with this opportunity. This is the message the World Business Council for Sustainable Development is championing with its Action 2020 roadmap, which sets out the business agenda for action. It is also one of the key findings of the Better Growth, Better Climate Report, which argues that traditional macroeconomic objectives are now best achieved through a decisive shift to a new climate economy, with inclusive, high quality, climate-resilient growth. Although the shift will not be easy, it provides all business sectors with new opportunities to grow.

This is certainly our experience at Unilever. Looking at the world through a sustainability lens not only helps us ‘future proof’ our supply chain, it also fuels innovation and drives brand growth. Half our agricultural raw materials now come from sustainable sources and we are on track to make that 100 percent by 2020. Our brands with a strong social purpose, such as Pureit water purifiers, Domestos toilet cleaner and Lifebuoy soap, are not only improving millions of lives by helping to tackle the Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) agenda. All three achieved double-digit sales growth on average over the past three years. This shows that there doesn’t have to be a trade-off between doing well and doing good. On the contrary, purpose driven brands are growing ahead of the market.

The same is true of brands that reduce environmental impacts. A laundry fabric conditioner that reduces the water needed to rinse clothes by two-thirds, dry shampoos that reduce CO2 by around 90 percent compared to washing hair with heated water, ice creams that stay frozen at higher temperatures, and compressed deodorant aerosol sprays with half the propellant gas and 25 percent less aluminium, are just some of the sustainability-inspired innovations that are growing our business.

These do not just come about because our brand managers have built sustainability into their brand development strategies or our R&D scientists have inserted it into their innovation processes. Everyone who works at Unilever is aware of our Sustainable Living Plan goals and understands the importance of this agenda. This is about bringing the challenges of the outside world into the business, making our employees more conscious of the issues and trends that affect our business, and being more open to ideas that push the boundaries of what we do or come from less conventional sources.

Making 2015 A Year Of Change

2015 can be a pivotal year for human development and climate change. In September leaders gather in New York to agree the Sustainable Development Goals that will replace the Millennium Development Goals.

The MDGs have made progress in a number of areas but many challenges remain. As Oxfam’s report Wealth: Having it all and wanting more has highlighted, levels of inequality are greater than they have ever been, extreme poverty and hunger still afflict more than 800 million people, and pressures on the planet’s resources continue to grow.

The SDGs include ending poverty and hunger, reducing inequality and combating climate change as core goals, achievable by 2030. The SDGs are an agenda for everyone, not just the development community, and will require collaboration across all actors in society. The decision by Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon to invite me to represent the business community on his High Level Panel to advise on the post-2015 development framework is a mark of the importance the UN attaches to the role of the private sector in co-delivering this agenda.

Then in December, the COP 21 Climate Change Conference in Paris holds out the very real prospect of a global agreement on curbing carbon emissions and the promise of a more stable and sustainable future.

Although run as separate agendas, these two issues – climate and development – are entirely interdependent. We cannot eliminate poverty without enabling developing countries to engage more people in economic activity that use natural resources, and we cannot resolve runaway climate change without creating wealth in a more equitable and less carbon intensive way. Left unchecked, climate change risks not only making the poorest poorer, but pulling the emerging middle classes back into poverty too.

Therefore, 2015 is a critical year. As Lord Stern has said, this year will shape the next 20 years and the next 20 years will shape the century. Whatever governments agree to in New York and Paris, and however high or low their level of ambition proves to be, the reality is that these agreements will succeed or fail by how they are implemented by business on the ground. Business as usual is not an option. We have to find new ways of working and new ways of collaborating to bring about real and lasting change.

Partnerships And Collaboration Will Be Key

These new approaches require business leaders with different mindsets and capabilities — men and women who can successfully build cross-sector coalitions, who are as familiar dealing with NGOs and policymakers as they are with customers and suppliers, and who are comfortable operating in a more volatile and complex environment. There are no blueprints for how to do this or roadmaps on how to navigate our way towards this brave new world. There is a role management education must play in preparing the business world for a more collaborative future.

I believe the solution is in bringing together the few key players that can make the biggest difference to create the market conditions that can lead to tipping points. It only takes a handful of companies to change together to trigger others to follow and transform whole markets.

This has been the thinking behind Unilever’s commitment to play a leading role in helping to end deforestation linked to supply chains. According to the IPCC, deforestation accounts for up to 15 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, making it a one of the largest contributors to climate change. More than 1.6 billion people worldwide depend directly on forests for food, medicines and fuel, including 60 million indigenous people who are almost entirely dependent on forests for their lives and livelihoods.

Palm oil, a key cause of deforestation, is an important and versatile ingredient found in 50 percent of all consumer goods. Multinational companies account for around 20 percent of all palm oil purchases. That is why, in 2010, all 400 members of the global Consumer Goods Forum (CGF) pledged to help achieve zero net deforestation by 2020. The CGF includes all the world’s major consumer goods companies, representing about 5 percent of global GDP. This has accelerated the number of companies committed to buying 100 percent sustainable palm oil by 2020 or sooner.

This led us to launch the Tropical Forest Alliance at Rio+20 in 2012, a partnership between the CGF and six governments, including Indonesia, a major producer of palm oil, the US and the UK. This in turn led to the New York Declaration on Forests, which took centre stage at the UN Climate Change Conference in September 2014, at which over 170 entities signed up to halving deforestation by 2020 and ending it by 2030.

This new pledge was the first time in history that a critical mass of developed and developing country world leaders partnered around such a goal, which also includes a commitment to restore hundreds of millions of hectares of forest land. Today, with pledges from all the major palm oil producers and most of the world’s big manufacturers and retailers, over 70 percent of the world’s globally traded palm oil is now committed to be sustainably sourced. Plantations under commitments cover an area the size of Portugal and the resulting savings to the planet is an estimated reduction of 400-450 million tons of carbon dioxide by 2020.

While these organizations still have to deliver on their commitments — so far only 18 percent of palm oil produced is certified sustainable – this shows what companies, governments and civil society can achieve if we align our efforts behind common goals to achieve transformative change.

If the consumer goods sector can do this with deforestation, just think of the difference that could be made if other sectors convene similar coalitions to drive sustainable practices in other commodity supply chains and with other sources of greenhouse gas emissions.

I am optimistic. Momentum is building. Progress is being made. By changing the way we do business, by seeing the transformation to a low-carbon economy as an opportunity to be seized, not a risk to be managed, by looking beyond our own impacts to systemic areas where we can make a transformational difference, and by working with others to achieve shared goals, business can play a much bigger role in helping to create a better future.

But there’s no time to lose. The time to act is now.

Lacey Spears On Trial After Allegedly Poisoning Her Son With Sodium

WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. (AP) — A confounding and heartbreaking murder case alleging that a mother purposely poisoned her 5-year-old son with salt and documented his decline on social media began Monday in the New York suburbs.

Lacey Spears, 27, of Scottsville, Kentucky, who presented herself online as a supremely devoted mother, is charged with depraved murder and manslaughter in the death a year ago of Garnett-Paul Spears.

“This mother was intentionally feeding her child salt at toxic levels,” prosecutor Doreen Lloyd said at Spears’ arraignment.

The boy’s sodium levels rose to a dangerous point with no medical explanation, prosecutors said, leading to a swollen brain, seizures and death. They believe his single mother, who was sharing his hospital room at Westchester Medical Center, administered salt through a feeding tube into Garnett’s stomach.

All the while, she was keeping followers up to date with 28 online postings in the last 11 days of his life, noting his death with, “Garnett the great journeyed onward today at 10:20 a.m.” She had tens of thousands of entries over Garnett’s lifetime, many about his doctor and hospital visits.

“My Sweet Angel Is In The Hospital For The 23rd Time,” Spears tweeted on Nov. 9, 2009, adding a sad-faced emoticon. “Please Pray He Gets To Come Home Soon.”

Jury selection began Monday with a pool of 90 potential jurors on hand at the courthouse. Several told the judge they had seen some of the extensive news coverage of the case.

In rulings delivered last week, Lacey Spears’ messages on Facebook, Twitter and MySpace were determined relevant and are likely to be introduced as evidence. Some of the posted photos depict Garnett’s declining health, said acting state Supreme Court Justice Robert Neary.

Neary also found that prosecutors can tell jurors about Internet research Spears did on her iPhone into the dangers of sodium in children and the properties of iodized salt.

In addition, the judge said Garnett’s hospital records from Alabama, Florida and New York are relevant and “inextricably interwoven into the fabric of this case. They provide a history of the child’s medical issues and treatment leading up to his death. They illustrate the defendant’s role as custodian and care giver.”

Prosecutors believe Spears often lied to doctors about Garnett’s health, for example claiming he had celiac disease when he didn’t.

Spears’ lawyers have not publicly detailed a defense strategy and did not return calls seeking comment. Attorney Stephen Riebling said in July that the defense would focus “on the relevant facts, not fiction.”

Spears, originally from Decatur, Alabama, was living in Chestnut Ridge, New York, at the time of Garnett’s death. She moved to Kentucky before her arrest in June and has been jailed since then. A man who says he is Garnett’s father lives in Alabama.

Other evidence in the case includes bags used to feed Garnett which prosecutors say have “extraordinary” concentrations of sodium. The prosecution says Spears tried to cover up by asking a friend to take a feeding bag, “get rid of it and don’t tell anybody.”

The trial apparently will not include any reference to Munchausen by proxy, a disorder in which caretakers purposely but secretly harm children and then enjoy the attention and sympathy they receive. Some experts regard it as a mental illness and a defense to such crimes, while others consider it a motive. Several believe Spears’ case fits the syndrome.

Spears’ lawyers asked the judge to prohibit any mention of Munchausen and prosecutors said they had no plans to bring it up.

The murder charge alleges Garnett was killed “under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life” rather than with intent. It carries the same maximum sentence as intentional murder, however – 25 years to life. The manslaughter count alleges Spears killed her son “while intending to cause serious physical injury.”

5 Questions From A Newer Mom to Those With Grown Children

Whenever a friend asks me for any type of parenting advice, I can’t help but stare back blankly for a moment. Me?! I’m only three years into this parenting gig. What the hell do I know? On the rare occasion that I start feeling pretty confident that I can handle anything my girls throw at me, I am presented with a new situation, problem, illness or question that reminds me I am absolutely still at the novice level.

It took having kids for me to understand just how challenging and intricate parenting really is. It takes an entire childhood for parents to really get educated about their role, but by then, of course, the child is grown and moves out. What a cruel joke Mother Nature plays on us! So, as a newer mom with only three years of experience, I have a few questions for you older moms with grown children who finally know what you’re doing.

1. How can I best cherish these young years? I’ve heard that it “goes so fast” so often — strangers have even stopped me in the grocery store to say something nice about my young daughters before adding, “Cherish it now. It goes so fast.” I try; I really do. I have the privilege of being home with my girls, who are not yet in school all day, so I get far more time with them than the average parent in our society. I promise I do not take that granted. Still, these past three years have passed so quickly that it scares me. I can’t seem to slow down time, so how can I best cherish these young years with my girls?

2. What do you wish you had done less or more? Since becoming a parent, I have marveled at the fact that my mom raised three kids and still kept a clean house. When I ask her how she did it, she answers honestly, “I probably spent too much time cleaning. If I could do it again, I wouldn’t care so much if my house was a little messy. Those were minutes I could have just been sitting and playing with you.” For the record, my mom was/is an amazing mom, and I have no memories of longing for her to play with me; I feel she spent a ton of quality time with me. The point is, however, she feels she missed out on a few more precious moments. I often think about that while I’m on my hands and knees scrubbing my kitchen floor.

3. Will I ever sleep well again? I do not support the cry-it-out method and, therefore, have spent a lot of nights going in and out of my daughters’ rooms. My 3-year-old sleeps through the night without issues, and my 1-year-old usually makes it. However, I’m still up a couple times most nights to check on them, move the covers back up or getting up way before the sun to work so I won’t be distracted by a work to-do list when my kids are awake. I daydream about the days when I’ll sleep through the night too, waking each day fully rested, but then I imagine them as teenagers and don’t see myself getting any more sleep. I think about them growing up and eventually moving out, and I actually imagine getting less sleep, as I won’t be able to quietly peek in on them at night and see that they are okay. Tell me, experienced moms, does sleep ever become familiar again?

4. What do you really remember about these young years of motherhood? Each day with my girls is an adventure. There is laughter, excitement and drama throughout the day, and I always think to myself, I will never forget this. However, it’s already become apparent to me that I will forget a great deal of it, and it makes me so sad. Of course I can’t remember every moment, every story, every conversation, hug and snuggle we experience. But I want to. I want to hang on to every instant of it forever. I write down as much as I can and take plenty of pictures, but I know those aren’t the same. So, experienced moms, what do you really remember about the first few years with your children? Which moments are embedded deep in your memory, available for your recall whenever you want?

5. What do your children tell you now? We’ll always have our own thoughts about what we did right and wrong as parents, but as our children age, they can share their thoughts on it. What do your kids, now adults, thank you for? What do they ask you for advice on? What do they think you did so well and plan to (or already do) with their own children? The answers to those questions reveals more about your parenting successes or failures than anything else.

Parents — experienced and new — all have one thing in common; we love our kids and we’re trying to do right by them. To the moms of grown children reading this: your own children are off living their adult lives, but your acquired parental knowledge will still be appreciated by the next generation. I implore you – please share.

2015-01-26-IMG_0030_2.jpg

Here's Why Uber Is Tripling Prices During A State Of Emergency

Uber announced Monday that it won’t charge riders more than about three times its normal fare during “Winter Storm Juno,” the blizzard hitting the Northeast.

In an email to customers, the car service said that it would cap its surge pricing at 2.8 times its usual rate. Currently, this rate applies only to New York City and is subject to change as the storm moves.

How did Uber, which increases prices during times of high demand, arrive at that precise limit?

The answer is an agreement the company reached with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman in July. It allows surge pricing once a state of emergency has been declared, but limits how high fares can go. Uber has agreed to limit pricing to “the normal range of prices it charged in the preceding sixty days.”

In addition to capping surge pricing, Uber agreed to donate the company’s proceeds from rides — which is 20 percent of the fare, plus $1 — to the Red Cross. The company confirmed Monday that it would adhere to this pledge during the blizzard.

In response to a request for comment on the price surge during the storm, Uber directed The Huffington Post to a July statement explaining how it sets prices during a state of emergency. The statement said “the state of emergency price will be set after excluding the 3 highest-priced, non-emergency days of the preceding 2 months.” So to set fares for the blizzard, the company took surge prices from the last two months, arranged them from highest to lowest, and set a price somewhere below the highest three.

Uber has been criticized for drastically raising prices during emergencies such as Hurricane Sandy and the recent terrorist attacks in Sydney. The company has long defended its surge pricing, saying that it helps increase the number of drivers on the road when demand is highest.

But even if some Uber drivers are ready to take to the road to get higher fares during the storm, they’re still subject to travel bans in place in several northeastern cities. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo declared a state of emergency Monday at 1:30 p.m. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said at a press conference Monday that no non-emergency vehicles would be allowed on the streets Monday night. Connecticut has issued a state-wide travel ban beginning at 9 p.m. Monday.

New York City taxis will not charge additional fares while they are allowed to be on the road. They’re also offering free rides to emergency responders, as well as any elderly New Yorkers or people with disabilities who are in an emergency situation.

Lyft, a competing service, said in an email Monday that it would cap surge pricing at two times the normal rate, the company’s standard policy.