Obama To Propose Protecting 1.4 million Acres Of U.S. Arctic Refuge: Report

WASHINGTON, Jan 25 (Reuters) – U.S. President Barack Obama will propose protecting 1.4 million acres (556,000 hectares) of Arctic refuge from oil and gas drilling, The Washington Post reported on Sunday.

The administration plans to propose designating the area of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as wilderness, the highest level of federal protection that would ban oil and gas drilling, the newspaper reported, citing people briefed on the plan. (Writing by Doina Chiacu; Editing by Frances Kerry)

'Orange Is The New Black' Beats 'Modern Family' At PGA Awards

Orange is most definitely the new black when it comes to awards praise.

The Netflix show may have been shut out by the undefeated “Modern Family” for Best Comedy at the Emmys last year — which people weren’t too pleased about — but Jenji Kohan’s series has finally triumphed.

At the Producers Guild Awards on Saturday night, “Orange Is the New Black” took home the 2015 PGA Award for Outstanding Producer of Episodic Television, Comedy. The women’s prison comedy beat out “Modern Family,” which has won for the past four years, as well as “The Big Bang Theory,” “Louie” and “Veep.”

“OITNB” also received acclaim when named one of the American Film Institute’s top 10 television programs of the year last December. While “Modern Family” had been included on the AFI list from 2010 to 2013, the ABC comedy was left off last year.

The two series will go head-to-head again on Sunday night when they’ll compete for the Screen Actors Guild Award for Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in a Comedy, which “Modern Family” has won for the past four years. Will the ladies of Litchfield upset the Dunphys and Pritchetts again?

The 21st annual SAG Awards air on Sunday at 8:00 p.m. ET on TBS and TNT.

After March 2, Reverse Mortgage Borrowers Will Have to Prove They Are Not Deadbeats

One of the attractive features of the HECM reverse mortgage has been that there are no income or credit requirements. All homeowners 62 and older who live in their homes without a mortgage have been eligible, and those with mortgages may also be eligible if the balance is not too large. But all that will change effective March 2, 2015 when a series of drastic new FHA rules come into play.

The precipitating factor underlying the new rules is the marked rise that has occurred in recent years in property tax defaults by HECM borrowers. While such borrowers are violating their obligations under the reverse mortgage contract, and are thereby subject to foreclosure and eviction, FHA has been understandably reluctant to allow elderly homeowners to be thrown into the street. Because of the potential political and public relations fall-out, those critical provisions of the HECM contract are essentially unenforceable.

Instead, FHA has elected to impose income and credit requirements on future applicants. The purpose is to assure that henceforth borrowers will have both the capacity and the willingness to pay their property taxes and homeowners insurance. While this won’t affect existing loans that are now in default, it should sharply reduce the default rate on new loans. The downside is that future borrowers will have to pay the higher costs of originating and servicing HECMs, and wait longer for deals to be completed.

The new underwriting requirements that lenders will apply to all applicants are very detailed, and in some respects tougher than those used with standard mortgages. I went through the new rules with an underwriter, who pointed out a series of provisions that went beyond anything in the rules pertaining to standard mortgages. This is strange, considering that applicants for reverse mortgages pay only taxes and insurance whereas applicants for standard mortgages also pay principal and interest, which is usually much larger.

On the other hand, the applicant for a standard mortgage who fails to meet the underwriting criteria is rejected whereas the applicant for a reverse mortgage who fails the test has another option, called a Fully-Funded Life Expectancy Set-Aside. The Set-Aside is an amount drawn under the HECM that is reserved for payment of property taxes and insurance by the lender. The amount, calculated using a formula provided by FHA, is viewed as sufficient to assure the required payments can be met though the entire life span of the borrower.

I calculated the required Set-Aside for a borrower of 75 with life expectancy of 144 months, taxes and insurance charges of $5000 a year, and interest rate plus mortgage insurance premium of 5%. It was $54,000, not a trivial sum. If this borrower had equity in his home of only $100,000, the Set-Aside would use virtually all of it, and no additional funds could be drawn. If his equity was less, the required Set-Aside would not be possible and he would be rejected.

There is another possible option, however, termed a Partially-Funded Life Expectancy Set-Aside. This is available to applicants who meet the credit requirements and are therefore viewed as willing to meet their obligations, but don’t have enough income. This Set-Aside, which can be much smaller, is used to draw funds from the HECM twice a year, which are sent to the borrower who makes the payments.

In addition to their complexity, the new rules have two remediable weaknesses. One is that the new underwriting requirements must be applied to every applicant. But applicants with plenty of equity in their homes might find that the fully-funded Set-Aside imposes no burden on them at all, in which case the underwriting costs could be avoided. There is no reason why lenders and borrowers should not have that option.

The second weakness is mandating that the lender make the required payments under the fully-funded Set-Aside. Why not give borrowers the option of making the required payments with their own funds, with the inducement that an equivalent amount will be transferred from the Set-Aside account to the borrower’s credit line? The purpose is to encourage borrowers to become responsible. This would involve no risk to FHA, since the lender will make the payments if the borrower doesn’t.

You can contact the professor at http://mtgprofessor.com

Deflated Footballs: Mother Nature Didn't Do It

Unless you are Rip van Winkle, you are well aware that the footballs in the game in New England were underinflated. There is talk that the weather is to blame. If you run the numbers, the equation looks like this:

2015-01-25-ScreenShot20150125at11.46.39AM.jpg

To do the calculation, let’s assume that the pressure before the game is 13 psi (P1), that the temperature of the locker room is 70 degrees Fahrenheit (T1), and that the game was played on an unseasonably warm January day at 49 degrees Fahrenheit (T2). Then, the trick is to solve for the pressure of the ball when on the field (P2).

So does this drop in temperature account for the missing two pounds of pressure?

After some mathematical wrangling, the answer is no. This temperature difference between the locker room and the temperature of the field does not account for the change. You get a value of 12.5 psi, which is within the limits for the football pressure of 12.5 and 13.5 psi as set by NFL Rule 2 Section 1. (Note about the math: You can’t just plug in these numbers directly, they need to be converted to Newton/meter2 and Kelvin and then converted back to units we use.)

Here is a simple video that does the math.

And, if we did these mathematical gymnastics again and this time used the lower limit of 12.5 psi as the starting point, then the ball pressure this time will be 12 psi.

The bottom line is that you cannot blame Mother Nature for the missing pounds of pressure, not fully.

As with science, there are of course other factors involved and more exacting ways to do this calculation. But, whether you run these numbers on back of an envelope or at a computer at NASA, the bottom line is the same:

Mother Nature is off the hook!

Jaime Castano's Lawyer: Prosecution Can't Prove Woman Didn't Want To Be Set On Fire

The lawyer for the New York University student accused of setting his sleeping female classmate on fire is arguing there is no proof the victim was not voluntarily participating in the act.

Her client, 20-year-old Jaime Castano, allegedly filmed himself setting fire to the bed in his dorm room where his classmate was sleeping in August. In the video, he can be heard singing while the victim wakes up and puts out the blaze.

Alyssa Gamliel, Castano’s attorney, said at his arraignment on Tuesday that she does not believe the prosecution “will be able to prove that [the victim] was not sort of participating in some of this activity,” according to the New York Daily News.

The victim, who was intoxicated when the incident occurred, suffered burns on her torso but survived the attack. Officials say she did not know what caused her burns until the next day, when she saw the video via Snapchat. School officials reportedly knew about the August incident shortly after it occurred, but did not tell the NYPD until October because the victim was hesitant to get police involved.

Castano’s agent profile on Citi Habitats, the real estate agency where he was previously employed, stated, “I offer clients an unparalleled work ethic, and experience in assisting with the long process of finding the right space and closing a transaction,” according to The Real Deal.

Castano is facing charges of assault and reckless endangerment.

@media only screen and (min-width : 500px) {.ethanmobile { display: none; }}

Like Us On Facebook |
Follow Us On Twitter |
Contact The Author

Economy Class Gets An Upgrade – Wait, Make That a Downgrade

2015-01-25-shutterstock_140396434.jpg

The lowly economy-class section is getting an upgrade in 2015. Or a downgrade, depending on your point of view.

At least two airlines are unveiling new coach class sections this spring. Alaska Airlines, with its Alaska Beyond service, will add custom leather seats, roomier overhead bins and new in-flight entertainment options. And Delta Air Lines, which is also in the throes of an ambitious cabin overhaul, will introduce a new basic economy-class fare, creating what some are calling a “fifth class” of service.

Economy class — the cabin most airline passengers fly in — rarely gets this much attention. Airlines prefer to focus on their high-revenue business travelers, lavishing them with repeated remodelings of their first-class cabins. So when the cheap seats get a makeover, it’s easy to assume that’s good news for the average air traveler.

But not all upgrades are the same. In fact, Alaska’s and Delta’s are worth closer looks, because they offer dramatically different visions of air travel in 2015.

Delta’s changes are the most sweeping. The airline is quietly redefining “economy class.” On the visual side, its economy section will come with distinctive new seats, wireless Internet access and, in some cases, larger overhead bins — all part of a billion-dollar update of its cabin interiors.

But its economy-class fares are undergoing an overhaul, too. Delta’s new basic economy-class tickets are highly restrictive, a departure from its standard economy tickets, which it will continue to offer on its flights. No changes, refunds or upgrades will be allowed on these new fares, nor can you make advance seat reservations. Delta introduced these fares as an experiment in certain markets in 2012 and decided to expand them late last year.

Delta’s basic tickets are the same E-class fares that a decade ago came with a seat assignment, two checked bags and the ability to change a reservation. The airline didn’t discount the tickets in exchange for the new restrictions. Instead, it asked customers whether they would be willing to accept that same E fare with new limits, and enough passengers said yes.

The discount on a basic fare can be significant. An advance-purchase, round-trip flight from Fort Lauderdale, Fla., to Detroit in January cost $206 in basic and $246 in regular economy class.

“The basic economy fare is competitive with other carriers,” says Delta spokesman Paul Skrbec. “But it’s on the back of a very solid core economy product.”

By “other carriers,” he means budget airlines such as Allegiant and Spirit, known for their tight legroom and abundance of fees. Observers fear that over time, Delta could segment its basic customers in their own cabin with even less legroom and personal space. Skrbec says Delta has no such plans.

Harlan Platt, a finance professor at Northeastern University, says that, from a customer-experience point of view, the Delta remodeling is largely “cosmetic.”

“They fail to touch on the big three concerns of most passengers: legroom, access to bins, and fair prices and fees,” he says. “Like most oligopolistic industries, this is what we can expect in the future.”

Maybe, maybe not.

Across the country, in Seattle, Alaska Airlines is also working on its new economy-class section. From a distance, the improvements look similar to Delta’s — a better seat (in this case, an adjustable leather seat made by Recaro, an award-winning aircraft seat designer) plus power outlets in every seat back. Alaska has also overhauled its menu, offering entrees created by some of the Northwest’s best-known chefs.

Alaska addresses at least one of the passenger concerns cited by Platt more overtly. Later this year, some of its new aircraft will have Boeing’s “innovative” space bins, which offer 45 percent more room. The seats will be about the same size as the previous economy seats, offering between 31 and 32 inches of seat pitch — a rough industry measure of legroom. That’s about three inches less than the basic economy-class seat had before airline deregulation in 1978.

Perhaps the most significant part of Alaska Airlines’ overhaul is what it didn’t do. It did not announce plans to change the way it segments customers. It doesn’t charge economy-class passengers for advance seat reservations, and if you cancel a ticket 60 days before your flight, it charges no fees. (After that, it’s $125, compared to the $200 charged by most large airlines.)

“We’re harnessing all the things our customers say make us Alaska, and making the amenities available to all customers — not just a certain section or segment of customer,” says Halley Knigge, an airline spokeswoman.

In other words, these economy-class changes might look similar, but they are not the same. One reinforces the traditional concept of coach class — that no matter where you sit on a plane, you can expect a minimum level of service and amenities. The other reduces the air travel experience to a use-it-or-lose-it ticket, critics say.

Which vision will win? That’s not a hard question to answer. Air travelers tend to reflexively book the lowest fare without considering the consequences. Delta said it did not conduct any focus groups and that its customers didn’t directly ask for a more restrictive economy-class ticket. Rather, it offered the tickets and people bought them, which the airline says proves consumers want them.

That kind of market research is unlikely to improve the flying experience, says Jono Anderson, aviation expert at the global consulting firm Strategy&. Airlines are making too many guesses and assumptions rather than using advanced analytics and actual customer feedback to make decisions about their products. “They need to know their customers better,” he says.

Until then, you should get to know your economy-class section better. Sites like Hipmunk.com, which gauge a flight’s “agony,” or RouteHappy.com, which displays flights based on comfort, can separate the most miserable economy-class experiences from the rest. Delta’s new basic restrictions are also clearly disclosed when you book through the airline’s Web site. But now more than ever, you need to pay attention — especially if you’re flying in economy class.

After you’ve left a comment here, let’s continue the discussion on my consumer advocacy site or on Twitter, Facebook and Google. I also have a newsletter and you’ll definitely want to order my new, amazingly helpful and subversive book called How to Be the World’s Smartest Traveler (and Save Time, Money, and Hassle). Photo: Shutterstock.

Obama Chief Of Staff Denis McDonough: Benjamin Netanyahu Didn't Spit In The Face Of The White House

WASHINGTON — White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough on Sunday downplayed reports that the White House was furious with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for accepting an invitation from House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) to address Congress about the dangers of negotiating with Iran.

Appearing on NBC’s “Meet The Press,” McDonough distanced himself and President Barack Obama from an anonymous senior administration official who told the Israeli newspaper Haaretz that Netanyahu had “spat in our face publicly” by accepting the invitation and that “there would be a price.”

“I can guarantee that it’s not me, not the president, and not what we believe,” McDonough said. “We think that, as a general matter, we, United States, has stayed out of internal politics in the countries of our closest allies.”

The administration has said Boehner’s invitation was a breach of protocol because the speaker did not consult the White House. Obama has said he will not meet with Netanyahu during his visit, which is scheduled two weeks before Israeli elections.

Despite the breach, McDonough said he did not think the incident would harm the relationship between the United States and Israel.

“I’m not going to get hyperbolic or emotional about this,” McDonough said. “Our relationship with Israel is many faceted, deep and abiding. It’s focused on a shared series of threats, but also, on a shared series of values that one particular instance is not going to inform overwhelmingly.”

Boehner’s invitation to Netanyahu was part of an effort to earn support in Congress for new sanctions on Iran. The Obama administration opposes new sanctions because they could thwart efforts to reach a nuclear deal with Iran.

Last week, Secretary of State John Kerry appeared to undermine Boehner and Netanyahu by publicly revealing that an Israeli intelligence official had told a U.S. congressional delegation that new sanctions would be like “throwing a grenade” into the negotiating process.

Sceptre announces SoundBase TV Audio System

sceptre-tv-soundbaseSceptre, a name that many of us are familiar with when it comes to rolling out high performing LED HDTVs, LCD HDTVs and PC monitors. This time around, they have introduced their latest offering which will not be visual in nature, but rather, to appeal to the aural senses. Basically, the Sceptre SoundBase TV Audio System is an attractive mix of a Bluetooth speaker and a sound bar, being able to transform regular TV programming into an amazing audio entertainment experience as it hooks up sans wires to just about any Bluetooth device for music streaming.

The Sceptre SoundBase TV Audio System would boast of a quartet of speakers as well as a subwoofer, delivering a combined 75 watts of lifelike surround sound audio. Some might even say that this is the perfect addition to any room, where the SoundBase has the ability to support TVs that are up to 55-inches in size, and less than 65 lbs. in weight, making it the ideal TV sound base if you would want to have a lovely home entertainment system in your nest.

It will come equipped with Bluetooth 4.0 connectivity to boot, allowing users to hook up devices wirelessly and offer full control over your music thanks to the SoundBase remote control. This is a truly easy to setup speaker which will connect to a plethora of smart devices including the likes of TVs, monitors, music players, stereos, and more; has customizable sound profiles; where it will also come with a trio of pre-set professional sound modes which will offer the best sound quality for TV, film or music.

Those who are interested in picking up this lovely looking Sceptre SoundBase TV Audio System (which will not look as though it will clutter up your home for sure!) will be able to do so from various retailers such as Amazon, Best Buy, Costco, K-Mart, Newegg, QVC, Sears, Target, TigerDirect and Walmart.

Press Release
[ Sceptre announces SoundBase TV Audio System copyright by Coolest Gadgets ]

Apple iCloud EULA Turned into Story about Giving up Freedom: Agreeculture

The length and legalese of consumer products’ licensing documents have become running jokes of the 21st century, but the issue’s ramifications are no laughing matter. Graphic design student Florence Meunier may not have found a practical alternative to unreadable End-User Licensing Agreements (EULA), but at the very least she made a subversive reminder of the problem by crafting a short story out of the Apple iCloud EULA through editing and wit.

the_man_who_agreed_1zoom in

Florence’s class was tasked to make a user-friendly printed version of the iCloud EULA. She could have rephrased or summarized the document in simple terms, or perhaps turned it into a comic book. Instead, she printed the EULA and then added a transparent sheet over each page. The sheets blacked out parts of the text, revealing the story of The Man Who Agreed. It’s about a man who clicked “I Agree” to a licensing prompt on his computer without actually reading its contents. Sound familiar?

the_man_who_agreed_2zoom in

By clicking this link to Florence’s website, you agree to read the story of The Man Who Agreed, and agree that we will not be held liable for any damages arising from the loss of your precious time in so doing. Further, estoppel res judicata souvlaki le chasseur de buts.

[via Fast Co. Design]

Buy the original, 47-year-old Star Trek phaser for $60k

Buy the original, 47-year-old Star Trek phaser for $60kStar Wars may have those sweet lightsaber weapons, but Star Trek will always have phasers, which are… kind of cool? Well, never mind that, if you’re a big fan of the original Star Trek TV series, you better get yourself to Los Angeles quick, as an original prop phaser is going to be auctioned, and it’s expected to sell for … Continue reading