Fresh off its two Golden Globe wins, Amazon is streaming all ten episodes of its Transparent original series for free this weekend. Starting at 12:01AM ET until 11:59PM PT Saturday, you can watch via Amazon’s Instant Video app for TVs, streaming gadg…
NVIDIA has just launched its mid-range line of chips based on the company’s Maxwell Architecture. We have discussed Maxwell abundantly already, but if you missed it, it’s a graphics processor (GPU) architecture that doubled the Performance/Watt ratio when compared to previous generation NVIDIA GPUs, which were already quite good. With NVIDIA’s Maxwell, it is possible to push the performance to higher levels at any given power level, or decrease power consumption and cooling requirements significantly.
The GeForce GTX 960 will occupy the segment previously held by GeForce 560, 660 or 760 in the $199-$250 space. This is typically a much larger market than the high-end $400+ cards because it’s where users can find the best Performance/Price ratio. “Bang for the Buck” is the most important metric for anyone who’s a bit cost conscious but still wants great performance.
It’s also often (financially) smarter to stay just behind the curve and update a mid-range graphics card regularly than trying to jump onto a high-end card and stick with it for a very long time. Already, independent benchmarks are confirming NVIDIA’s claim that the GTX 960 is very much more efficient as the GTX 660 — many times by as much as 100%.“60FPS FIRMLY ENTERING THE MID-RANGE MARKET”
In practice, this means that a lot of games that were running at 30FPS in 1080p resolution or so (which is deemed the acceptable speed by a lot of gamers) will now run at 60FPS. This is a remarkable progress and most definitely an impactful improvement to the gameplay, especially on fast-paced games — and all that often running with the highest quality graphics settings (your luck may vary depending the game).
When I met with NVIDIA prior to the launch, we discussed the performance of their MFAA (Multi-Frame sampled AA) anti-aliasing technique as well (not to be confused with MSAA, or Multi-Sample AA). This is used to smooth out the edges of objects to avoid having a pixilated aspect when there is a strong contrast between the contour of an object and the background.
First, you can see MFAA in action here, compared against the older TXAA technique, but the important part of MSAA (Multi-Frame Anti-Aliasing) is that it allows to use more flexible pixel sampling positions, and spread the sampling over multiple frames, thus largely reducing the compute resources and bandwidth, without visible effects on image quality.“SILENT GAMING AT FULL FRAME RATE”
“Silent Gaming PC” seems like and odd thing to say, but NVIDIA has demonstrated that a GeForce GTX 960 could in fact run a game a full frame rate, with passive cooling when running at 30W. The card also support the flicker-free GSync technology, up to 144 FPS, if you have the right monitor. This is a nutty framerate to play at.
Interestingly, NVIDIA says that specific markets such as gamers of World of Tanks, League of Legends ($1B in revenues) or Dota 2 were big enough to justify a particular attention and resources from the GPU company.
It makes sense because these games don’t “require” an uber-fast GPU worth $400+, but can look their best with the $199 GeForce GTX 960.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 Aims For Mid-Range GPU Supremacy , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.
When it was announced, the world wondered aloud just how long the Apple Watch would last. After some prodding, Apple said they expected a days use from the wearable, though in what manner they imagined that battery life wasn’t known. Now we’re getting more detail on how long the Apple Watch will last, and under what circumstances. For those expecting … Continue reading
Now that most major auto manufacturers are producing electric cars, we can look to the next phase of the plan: infrastructure. Save for Tesla, we’ve not heard too much about charging stations implemented in a big way. Today, VW and BMW are announcing a joint venture with ChargePoint to bring a series of fast charging stations to the East and … Continue reading
This is just too good.
It’s not a huge surprise that Richard Dawkins gets a large amount of hate male from right-wing religious zealots. The 73-year-old is an evolutionary biologist and atheist who is openly critical about creationism and the concept of intelligent design.
We also suppose it shouldn’t be surprising that a large portion of this anti-gay hate mail is laced with anti-gay rhetoric. In this new video from Dawkins, titled “Love Letter to Richard Dawkins,” the biologist reads some of these hilarious messages he receives from religious fanatics who seem to be very unhappy with his work.
“Have you ever tried to make love to a monkey?” one reader questions. “I mean, I wouldn’t be surprised if you had since sodomites are now running all of our universities. But either way i hope you do get sodomized by satanic monkeys in hell. Sincerely, a created daughter of our Lord.”
Another gem from the video:
“Hahaha bitch. No you are not an atheist, you are a gay-thiest LOL. They should call you Richard Dick-ins because you’re so busy sucking off Bill Maher and those Labor Party dipshits. You can’t do anything else. Oh, and your science books are shit!”
These will have you cracking up. Check out “Love Letters To Richard Dawkins” above!
(h/t Towleroad)
What’s it like to fly on Air Force One?: originally appeared on Quora: The best answer to any question. Ask a question, get a great answer. Learn from experts and access insider knowledge. You can follow Quora on Twitter, Facebook, and Google+.
Answer by Peter Marquez, Former White House Director for Space Policy
It’s awesome. I only got to fly on her once.
The staff is amazing and after flying on AF1 you will NEVER want to fly commercial again.
The experience starts before you even get on the plane. You are transported from the White House to Andrews and you get to drive right up to the airplane and leave the vehicle and walk up into the plane (Only the president and his close staff get the Marine 1 transport to Andrews).
It’s very comfortable — huge seats, desks and tables for working. A full conference room with flat screens and video teleconferencing capability. There’s a computer room with Internet access.
One of the greatest things about AF1 has nothing to do with the aircraft itself — it’s the people that make AF1 run. All of the AF1 staff appear to really enjoy their jobs and they take great pride in their work. It definitely appeared that none of them took this great opportunity for granted. They are also well versed in the history of AF1 and can tell you stories about all the previous AF1s.
The trip I was on was very short. We were flying from DC to Kennedy Space Center for a speech President Obama was giving.
During the flight I had been helping to work and rework a speech the President was about to give. He kept coming out of his cabin with more edits and changes. After another round of edits from the boss an attendant looked at me and asked if I needed anything. I jokingly said, “Yes, a nice strong drink. Preferably a single malt” (it was about 9 or 10AM). Without pausing the attendant asks, “what brand and what year?” I had to tell him I was joking.
In addition to my colleagues and a few members of Congress we also had Buzz Aldrin on the flight. Dr. Aldrin was seated next to me at our table and he starts to get a bit fidgety, he looks around, and he says, “You wanna go take a look around?”
So I stop working for a minute and Dr. Aldrin and I start checking out AF1. We make it over to the stairs that lead to the upper deck and cockpit and one of the staff members asks if we want to head upstairs and check out the cockpit. Dr. Aldrin got a big smile on his face and looked at me — we were both smiling like little kids. Did we want to see the cockpit of AF1? Seriously? You have to ask?
So Dr. Aldrin and I make it up to the flight deck and all of the Air Force officers are in awe of this moon walker and here’s Buzz Aldrin happy as a little kid because he’s hanging out in the cockpit of AF1. Dr. Aldrin goes into the cockpit and I stand outside of it with my head sticking through the doorway. So here I am — essentially a nobody and I’m hanging out in the cockpit of AF1, with the pilots, while AF1 is in flight, and I’m with Buzz Aldrin. Somewhere back in time the 10 year old version of me was saying, “You have got to be kidding me…”
It was way too short of a flight.
But just a couple of more interesting bits.
First, as we started to descend I instinctively went back to my seat and buckled up. But I noticed a lot of the other “frequent flyers” were still up and walking around. So I asked one of them, “When are we supposed to sit down?” They just kind of laughed at my “noob question” and said something to the effect of –“You don’t really have to sit down at all just watch how the pilot lands this thing.” So people were still up and walking around as the plane landed. For someone who had only flown commercial it was a fascinating to me for some reason. Sure enough, the pilot put her down like a feather and came to a gentle stop.
Second, we landed on the space shuttle runway. Another thing that blew my mind. Of course we were going to an event at Kennedy Space Center so the closest runway is the space shuttle runway — but landing in AF1 on the space shuttle runway was more mind blowing then not having to sit down during landing.
Finally, you get a bill for the food you eat on AF1 (this may be the only thing AF1 has in common with United). Since you are eating a meal on AF1 you are doing so at taxpayer expense. This means you have to reimburse the government for whatever you ate. That’s completely fair and the right thing to do but it’s something you wouldn’t immediately consider when flying on AF1. So about a week after my AF1 flight I got a bill sent to me for the lunch I ate on AF1. That bill made for a great souvenir.
So to paraphrase philosopher Ferris Bueller — “It is so choice. If you have the means, I highly recommend…”
I forgot one more thing — if you make a phone call from AF1 it’s routed through a couple of operators who sit up on the flight deck. They make the outgoing call for you and then they connect you to the person once they make the call. The cool part is that when they call person for you they say something to the effect of (my memory is a bit fuzzy here), “This is Air Force One, we have a call from can you hold while I connect you?” I think just receiving a call from AF1 would be amazing.
More questions on Quora:
Together We Are Not Broken
Posted in: Today's ChiliSince I started a blog a few months ago, I often have inspirations — a small voice that tells me what I need to write about next. Sometimes these hunches are inspired by current issues in the media, and other times they are inspired by personal experiences that are making their way to the surface of my consciousness, urging me to write about them. This topic has been a nagging small voice for at least a month now. The media has definitely pushed this nagging voice, with Cosby, with the Rolling Stone debacle and the discussion of campus rape. But I had a great deal of fear about writing about my experiences. I realized that my fear is not all that different from what I felt 25 years ago when this experience happened. The fear is rooted in the shame of what I experienced and that blame that I still put on myself 25 years later. This collective, misplaced blame that our culture inflicts on survivors of sexual violence is something that is hard to escape.
Twenty-five years ago, October 1989, in my first month of college, I was raped. As a teenager, I never had a relationship and had never even kissed anyone. My experience with drugs and alcohol was extremely limited. On this night that is etched in my consciousness, I hung out with my roommate and her boyfriend and was under the influence of a drug that rendered me somewhat frozen. My roommate and her boyfriend left me at an apartment with someone I did not know. This person was drunk, took advantage of the situation and raped me.
I remember making my way back to my apartment, broken. I remember the long shower and the feelings that could not be washed away. I walked around campus that day in a fog of sadness and pain — heart-wrenching physical and emotional pain. Back in my apartment, my new friend, Heidi, looked at me and knew something was wrong. She pulled me back into her room and asked me what was wrong. I told her. She was loving and kind and most importantly believed me. Somehow the story got out to my four other roommates. One was extremely angry and wanted me to press charges. Two of them did not believe me and openly said that I was responsible for this experience, as I was there alone, and it must not have been rape. The one who left me there never did say much except to tell me later that her “real” boyfriend (not the one she had been with that night) was very angry at her for leaving me there, unprotected and vulnerable.
Reporting this rape was not an option in my mind. My mom was a director of a family violence/sexual assault agency, and I heard all the stories of women who were raped and their rapists were never convicted. Most importantly, in high school, I witnessed extreme victim blaming when a victim of statutory rape was ostracized for reporting the rape. These fears, the reactions of my two roommates, and the fact that it was an acquaintance rape where I was under the influence of drugs kept me silent. I did what was expected of me, kept quiet and let this trauma eat me up inside.
This experience colored my life in ways that I was not aware of until much later. It made an already difficult relationship with my body even more difficult. I learned to disconnect from my feelings even more and to detach from my body. The only thing good that came of it was that it solidified my friendship with my lifelong friend Heidi. My relationship with men became fraught with mistrust and fear for many many years. It took away my intuitive sense of what was healthy and what was not, and it was hard for me to discern who the “good” men were, and instead, I could only love men who were broken, even if they were violent. The disbelief of my roommates and the dismissal by others taught me to question my own reality. My intimate relationships were affected in ways that are difficult to define. I never went to therapy for it, because I didn’t know if it was real. Was it a real “rape,” or were my roommates correct in thinking it was my fault for being in that situation? Were the feelings of violation and deep despair a mere figment of my imagination?
Since this experience, I met many women and men who experienced similar traumas: women and men who never reported sexual violence, who questioned their reality even when they knew deep down they had been violated. These shared experiences have helped me validate my own reality, to know that what I experienced was real and to see how it affected me. I am filled with despair and guilt when I hear the statistics about the percentage of rapists who rape again. Could I have stopped this rapist? I can only hope it was a one-time thing for him, but I will never know.
Why do I share this now? Some of the reactions I have seen to the Cosby cases and to the Rolling Stone rape story have made me deeply uncomfortable. Again, 25 years later, I see victim blaming and questioning of victims stories. It is not a walk in the park to come forward with a story of deep sexual violation. The percentage of “false’ reporting of rapes is very small. It makes me physically ill when I see women and men accusing victims of lying or somehow profiting from reporting of these horrible violations. The Rolling Stone story made me even more uncomfortable as I heard that “friends” were sharing that there were discrepancies in Jackie’s story. This could have been me. My roommates could have come forward with similar allegations, even though what I experienced was very real. My heart went out to Jackie going through her recovery from this horrific event in the public eye. I cannot imagine how heart-wrenching and painful this must be for her.
I share my story because I cannot be silent. My silence makes me complicit in a culture that still blames victims for rape. I have two daughters and I do not want them to live in a world where women are brutalized. Unfortunately, they do. What can I do? I can teach my daughters to believe survivors of sexual violence, support them and fight for them. I can teach them to be open about their own experiences, to seek support and fight back. Importantly, I can teach them to never leave their friends alone in situations that could be dangerous, to listen to their guts and get themselves and/or others out of situations that just don’t feel “right.”
Looking back on this experience, I feel tremendous sadness for the broken and alone young woman that I was. My heart fills with gratitude that I had my friend to support, believe, and love me even though I could not talk about it. My heart breaks for men, women, boys and girls broken by sexual violence. Sometimes, we learn to slowly mend our broken pieces and tragically, sometimes we don’t ever mend those broken places and escape in death or addictions. The more we speak out about our experiences, the more we can fight a culture that shames us and strives to keep our experiences hidden. If we have the courage to share with others, to band together and speak out, we can become unbroken; ready to change a world that shames us and to eliminate sexual violence.
As our New Year’s Resolutions start feeling a little more like crap we won’t do again this year, I thought it might be helpful to think of how we can actually bring more balance into our lives as mothers. That’s what we are all looking for, right? We want to be skinnier and have the cleanest homes and be able to follow our dreams, all while corralling uncivilized, messy, poopy, shorter versions of ourselves.
That really doesn’t seem like too much to ask, so I came up with some ways that we can all do this:
1. Drop your pesky sleep habit. Who needs to sleep when you could be exercising or organizing your home or following your dreams? Not me. I have to care for children during the day so the night is ALL MINE.
2. Caffeine. The more, the better.
3. Be super-duper rich. Pay other people to love your children so you can love yourself.
4. Make rigid schedules and force everyone to stick to them like you are all in the military. That sounds fun, right?
5. Clone yourself. And make sure you amplify the genes that like to cook organic meals and wipe butts and wear uncomfortable lingerie.
6. Invent time travel… and stop Mark Zuckerberg from inventing Facebook.
7. Join a minimalist commune. Think of a place where your children’s only toys are frisbees that you can also use for plates. You could go nudist and then you won’t even have to do laundry!
8. Weave a magic carpet and fly away to a land where there is no time and no one will notice that you are missing. I like this one.
9. Believe in the power of The Secret and manifest children who will clean their rooms and eat broccoli without turning into Johnnie Cochran.
10. Become a sister wife. I really think these girls are on to something.
11. Live with your parents. Never mind, that one is just crazy.
So… good luck out there! Here’s to 2015 being the year we all find some balance. Or just maybe give ourselves and each other a break.
Democrat leaders loved President Barack Obama’s State of the Union speech, while Republican leaders didn’t. But what did the American people think of it? Here are five lessons we learned.
1) Americans are more enthusiastic about Obama’s policies now than before the SOTU.
The Wall Street Journal ran an article with polling data that suggested there is a big disconnect between the people and the politicians, like Obama and the Republican speakers. But a closer look shows that it was taken several days before the SOTU.
In the CNN poll, 72 percent felt Obama’s policies will move the country in the right direction. That’s up over 57 percent who felt that way several days before the State of the Union speech.
2) People surveyed were generally positive about the speech.
In the CNN poll, 51 percent found the speech to be “very positive” and another 30 percent found it “somewhat positive.” Only 18 percent found it either somewhat or very negative.
3) Voters liked Obama’s 2015 SOTU better than his 2014 SOTU.
In their critique of Obama’s speech, Republican leaders claimed it offered “more of the same.” But that’s not how CNN’s sample saw it. Nearly one-quarter found it “very effective” while another 44 percent believed it to be “somewhat effective.” That’s better than last year, where CNN found that only 18 percent found it “very effective,” with another 50 percent feeling it was “somewhat effective.”
4) Poll respondents liked some issues better than others.
The Washington Post had a small focus group which looked at how the participants felt about Obama on the issues. But what did a larger sample think?
Those questioned by CNN pollsters gave the highest marks to Obama on education (78 percent = right direction), perhaps reflecting support for his community college plan. In second was “race relations (74 percent),” rebutting criticism that even Rand Paul talked more about race than Obama did. After that, respondents felt Obama’s policies would take us in the right direction for the economy (71 percent), terrorism (69 percent), taxes (64 percent) and immigration (60 percent).
5) Americans still want Obama to work with Republicans in Congress.
The biggest critique voters have with Obama seems to be his style. Nearly three-quarters want Obama to forge a bipartisan compromise with Republicans in Congress. That’s up over 67 percent who felt that way a year ago. There’s a drop in support for unilateral action over the past year, by six percentage points.
Republicans frequently used the line “missed opportunity” to respond to Obama’s 2015 State of the Union address. But actually, it sounds more like a golden opportunity. The only question is whether the president will be able use this newfound public support. It appears that they would prefer compromises to Obama’s newfound desire for executive orders.
John A. Tures is a professor of political science at LaGrange College in LaGrange, Ga. He can be reached at jtures@lagrange.edu.
A Florida woman is accused of drugging two boys and having sex with them on separate occasions.
Barbara Kirby, 36, of Leesburg was arrested on Tuesday and charged with lewd or lascivious battery on a victim older than 12 and younger than 16 and tampering with a victim, according to WKMG.
One of the boys allegedly told police that, on Dec. 11, he went to Kirby’s house and she poured him a drink. The boy then said he “immediately began to feel dizzy and light-headed, and fell asleep,” according to an affidavit obtained by the Orlando Sentinel.
When he woke up, Kirby allegedly told him “age is just a number,” before having sex with him.
The second boy told authorities a similar story about Kirby pouring him a drink that made him pass out.
“I don’t know what to say about that,” one of Kirby’s neighbors, who was not identified, told WFTV. “You scar a child for life with that.”
@media only screen and (min-width : 500px) {.ethanmobile { display: none; }}
Like Us On Facebook |
Follow Us On Twitter |
Contact The Author