Hasta La Gadget!

Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney are scheduled to meet privately in Utah this week, raising the possibility that the two former governors will find a way to avoid competing presidential campaigns that would split the Republican establishment next year, two prominent party members said Wednesday night.

With severe overcrowding, abuse allegations and controversial sentencing laws, California’s prison system is a knotty political topic that often appears on the ballot. But according to a new study, many former inmates don’t know they can vote in elections.

A report released Thursday by the Greenlining Institute, a nonprofit that advocates for racial and economic equality, found that formerly incarcerated Californians often are unaware of their voting eligibility and wrongly believe they have to go through a special process to get back their voting rights. Current policy intended to inform former inmates of their rights may not be effective, according to the report.

Of the 21 former inmates interviewed for the report, 60 percent “have been confused at some point about their eligibility to vote due to a criminal conviction,” the study said. Co-author Zainab Badi acknowledged the small sample size. “But we were in two different counties and had a diverse pool of people, so we think this is indicative of a larger trend,” she said.

California, like many states, doesn’t allow current inmates or parolees to vote, but places no restrictions on voting rights for residents once they finish serving their sentences. Twelve states ban some former inmates from ever voting again.

Some former inmates told the study authors they believed they needed to take complicated measures to register as a voter. They said they were unaware that California only requires them to fill out a general voter registration form.

“Formerly incarcerated Californians … have a lot at stake in our elections,” Badi said in a press release. “We should be encouraging them to participate in our democracy as they reintegrate into society, and we need a much more comprehensive system for getting them the information they need to exercise their rights.”

When former inmates don’t vote, they miss the opportunity to change a correctional system’s failings. California passed major sentencing reforms in the last few years, including 2014’s Prop 47, which reclassified some drug convictions from felonies to misdemeanors, and 2012’s Prop 36, a reform to the state’s three strikes law, which one study participant recalled voting for.

“Years ago, I voted on Prop. 36 to give people with drug convictions the opportunity to get help instead of prison, not knowing years later it would save me from prison and save my life,” the former inmate said in the report. “So I think it’s very important to be able to vote.”

That former inmate, now on probation, did not know until the time of the study that she had not permanently lost her voting rights.

Badi told The Huffington Post that encouraging former inmates to participate in society is key to keeping them out of trouble.

“If they’re barred from voting, it can be very difficult for them to feel like they belong, and that’s a serious thing to consider if the prison system wants to reduce recidivism,” Badi said.

Assembly Bill 149, passed in 2013, requires California probation offices to post a link to the secretary of state’s voting rights guide for incarcerated people on their department website, or to post a notice with the Web address for that voting guide in the probation office. The law has fallen short of goals to better inform former inmates of their rights, the report concluded.

“I think that there are some really easy ways and minor steps that can be taken to have a tremendous impact here,” Badi said. She and her co-authors suggest the state eliminate confusion by expanding voter rights to allow current inmates to vote, as do Vermont and Maine.

The researchers alternatively suggest the state become more effective at disseminating voting rights information, possibly by providing voter education workshops, informing inmates of their rights when they’re finishing their sentences, or automatically mailing them voter registration cards.

The California Department of Corrections did not return HuffPost’s request for comment.

In case you haven’t noticed, team Engadget has spent a lot of time today covering Windows 10, Microsoft’s next-gen operating system. Over the course of the company’s three-hour keynote, we heard quite a bit more about its so-called universal apps, wh…

Meizu is certainly an up and coming smartphone company, where the China-based company is all set to hold a Meizu Connected press event that is tipped to happen later this January 28th. The Meizu m1 mini is tipped to receive an official release on that day, but assuming patience is not your strongest suit, perhaps a little teaser at the moment could help tide the twiddling of thumbs over in the mean time.

As you can see in the leaked image above of the alleged Meizu m1 mini, it does point to a single LED flash located near the rear camera, where the flash and overall proportions will be different from that of the Meizu m1 note. There were previous rumors that point to a 5” display, although it seems the Meizu m1 mini will pack in a smaller 4.7” display instead.

Hardware specifications of the Meizu m1 mini have yet to be revealed or confirmed, but it is widely expected that a Mediatek chipset that sports an octa-core processor will arrive, accompanied by 2GB RAM and 16GB of internal memory. I suppose there really isn’t much to do at the moment apart from sitting tight and riding out the waiting period for an official release.

Meizu M1 Mini Leaked Photo Points To Single LED Flash , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

I do know that gaming can get rather intense at times, but does it really need to rile up one’s emotions and feelings, so much so that animosity is created between players? Dota 2 has been the cause of a number of unrest cases throughout various computer cafés (or cybercafes) in the Philippines, so much so that one particular district in one large city has declared an outright ban on Dota 2.

When In Manila did reveal that there was a decree issued by the district council of Salawag, which has a community of approximately 60,000 souls, located within the larger city of Dasamariñas, which is right outside of Manila. The municipal ban has come about after reports of youths playing Dota 2 in public cafés ending up involved in brawls which have since caught public attention. Certainly not the best of behaviors, don’t you think so? And so, Salawag’s government decided that they had to step in to prevent any more fights – and who knows what an enraged person might end up doing when they see red? That is normally when logic is thrown out of the window.

Hence, and internet café that runs this game and violates the ordinance in the process would run the risk of punishment, including a suspension from operations for a month to a complete revocation of their business license.

Dota 2 Banned In A Philippines District , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.