A Revolutionary Entrepreneur On Happiness, Money, And Raising A Supermodel

A lucky few can say their work helped spur a fundamental shift in the economic model of modern societies.

If all goes well, Robin Chase may get to do it twice.

A decade before Airbnb and Uber, Chase helped kickstart the “collaborative economy” by co-founding Zipcar, which became the world’s largest car-sharing service. The big idea was to replace the enable convenient access to a valuable good (in this case, a vehicle) without requiring ownership.

Now Chase and others have founded Veniam. Their technology powers mesh networks, which provide a new way for people and things (devices, cars, appliances, etc.) to connect to each other and to the internet. The holy grail: ubiquitous no-cost wireless internet access that isn’t controlled by the telecom giants.

Fred Wilson, one of the most influential and successful technology venture capitalists of the last decade, announced last month that his firm has invested in Veniam. “We are consciously trying to see the future and seed the future,” he wrote.

Chase’s story is colorful. She was raised in the Arab world, the daughter of an American diplomat. She is the mother of three children, including one world-famous supermodel. And her career has seen lows as well as highs. “I was a complete shell,” she says of one tumultuous period. “It took me, honestly, probably a year to recover.”

I spoke with Chase for Sophia, a HuffPost project to collect life lessons from fascinating people. She shared practical wisdom about relationships, raising kids, finding happiness, how she approaches aging, and her latest thinking about the collaborative economy.

+ + +

Have you had any recent realizations about living a more fulfilling life?

I attribute a lot of what I have to dumb luck. I’ve made sure that my family and my children have understood that reality strongly. Being a white well-educated American who doesn’t have any immediate family in distress — that was just like a birthright. What a lucky thing.

My father was an American diplomat. I grew up in the Arab world. I feel that Americans, in particular, lack an appreciation for how incredibly lucky the circumstances of their birth are.

Did you try to foster that in some way with your own children?

There’s this story that lives in infamy. We’re sitting around the dining room table. My eldest daughter says, “I got straight A’s this semester,” filled with glee, making her younger siblings feel bad. I said to her, “You know, I’m not so impressed. You’re no Maya Angelou.”

I said, “There’s three things in life. You were born with the genes that you have through sheer luck. It had nothing to do with you; you can’t take any credit for that. Your environment is also dumb luck. You happened to be born to parents who believe in education. You have this great environment. You don’t get any credit for that. But you do get credit for working incredibly hard. So good for you. You worked incredibly hard. None of those other things you can get credit for.”

She fell out of her chair onto the dining room floor, laughing. She said all her peers were getting paid like $20 for each A-grade, and her mom is saying, “Well, an A is okay, but you’re not getting a lot of credit for that.”

So I absolutely did pound into them where our values lay and what they got credit for.

Below, Chase’s daughter Cameron Russell delivers a TED talk in which she discusses winning the “genetic lottery.”

You have said, “I’ve never been motivated by money.”

I have always lived my life in such a way that I feel like I’m not taking more than my fair share.

Everyone should be able to live the way I live. So you know, I have not bought my private jet [laughter]. I went to the Goodwill the other week and I got a spectacular silk designer dress that I was really happy with.

I’m still leading a low-consumption, low-footprint life. I think this goes back to, as my father taught me, that I am really an equal. I am an equal. It’s profoundly embedded in who I am.

I live in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in a very dense urban environment, mixed-income environment. Years ago, it was summertime, I have these three kids, I’m working, so I’m putting them into different activities.

For a while, I was feeling extreme angst. ‘Wow, my kids are so incredibly privileged. They’re getting to go to the day farm camp, or they’re getting to go to the Audubon habitat.’ And I was running through my head, ‘Are they getting too much privilege? Are they going to become spoiled brats?’

Then I thought, no, no. The standard that I should exercise here is, I think every child should get to have those things. I wanted to give my children what you would want for every child.

Putting genetics aside, is there anything you’ve done as a parent that you feel had a lasting impact on your children?

As I raised my children, I really wanted to impart that their happiness would revolve around family and relationships and maybe travel, and not around consumption, so that when they moved into adulthood, they could choose a much broader array of career potentialities. They could be a starving artist and be completely happy because their happiness was not stemming from some income stream.

My children do tease me that there were never any electronic toys in the house. There were no battery toys in the house. For a long, long time, the dress-up box and the pile of old FedEx boxes was the thing.

They will tell you, they led really happy childhoods. They are really pleased with their childhood. When they would say, “How come everyone else was getting these things, and we don’t have these things?” I’d say, “You know, I take you on a nice trip sometimes.”

That’s where my value is. Stuff is not — I’m not interested in that. I don’t want to have stuff.

A photo posted by @rmchase on Aug 5, 2014 at 2:03pm PDT

You left Zipcar after a period of intense work and fundraising, and shortly afterwards, your father passed away and your daughter’s modeling career took off. What changes did you make to your life after that period?

I am a person who works all the time and whose life is their work. I try to make the barrier between work and life — actually, I don’t have a strong barrier, because I really want to be working on things that I care about. By some measures, I am working all the time.

Post-Zipcar, I definitely was a complete shell. It took me, honestly, probably a year to recover. And then I promptly started working those same long hours.

A luxury of my life is that I’ve been able, with my spouse, to switch back and forth many times who is the primary breadwinner and who is the primary caretaker.

Whether or not I was doing one role or the other, I was still actively working on intellectual and other pursuits. And as my children have aged, whether I’m getting paid or unpaid, I’m still doing the same work.

Let me add this. It took me a long time to figure out who I am. Post-Zipcar, I’ve increasingly figured out that my best strengths are ones that I had never appreciated or really understood.

Now, as I’ve moved forward, I think I have a much better handle on that. I think I’m a good learner. And I’m learning a huge amount in lots of different disciplines. And then, being able to synthesize or seek connections across those fields to see larger patterns and make them feel simple.

To do that requires active listening. There’s this recursive piece where you are getting feedback from your environment as well as having your own ideas. You’re pushing a little bit in the direction that you think is the right direction. And you’re listening very carefully to what the feedback is on that. I think that is how we built Zipcar. And I think that is how I’ve been developing these ideas and this trajectory that I’m on.

I talk to a whole bunch of people. I listen to how those words fall, and their reactions and their experiences. That shapes how either I should be thinking or how I should be talking about it. It’s this constant, delicate learning and pushing path. It’s a funny — it’s a very active and directed listening.

What is your latest thinking about how technology is changing our economic models?

I have just finished writing a book. It’s called “Peers Inc.,” and the subtitle is “How People and Platforms are Inventing the Collaborative Economy and Reinventing Capitalism.” I’m totally psyched.

There is a new organizational paradigm that is happening. It is actively transforming how we build businesses, how we work and how we create economies.

If we think about crowd sourcing, Web 2.0, all that stuff, people are empowered. And many say this is “because of the internet.”

That lacks specificity. Actually what’s happening is we’re leveraging excess capacity, building platforms for participation that organize and simplify the work of these collaborating peers.

We have this new, deep collaboration that’s very resource-efficient — ‘resource’ meaning people, money, assets, networks — where companies or governments or institutions are doing only what they do best.

This is because transaction costs have now lowered. Dealing with many small parts is no longer an irritating thing. You don’t have to bring it internal. And the “peers” in a peer economy — which can be people or devices — are each doing what they do best.

So we have this new collaboration that’s incredibly powerful and has speed, scale, a high pace of innovation, and adaptability. This organizational paradigm matches our times. The global economy is moving at a very high pace of change. And this structure enables you to iterate and experiment, adapt and evolve, really quickly to match that pace.

It also changes the power structure. If you think about capitalism, it was based on scarcity and hoarding of assets, like trademarks, intellectual copyrights, secrets. This new economy is saying, actually, open shared assets deliver way more value than the old way. It is a fact.

It’s kind of the end-run for the Internet. The Internet was created 40 or 45 years ago. But we’ve really been working with it for about 25 years. Now it’s kind of come of age. We’re able to figure out, what are its powers? How do we use it?

The collaborative economy is larger than the sharing economy. The sharing economy feels to me like it’s about assets. The collaborative economy is everything. It’s making clear and visceral to us that, if I can have real-time access not just to hard assets, but to people, to networks, to experiences, it means that the way I do my own personal life is completely transformed. I don’t have to do any hoarding.

I don’t have to be worried about having stuff and owning it. I can start to rely on the fact that I can reach out and find the right person at the right moment. That dramatically transforms how you live. Instead of on-demand cars, it’s an on-demand life, in a much larger fullness.

It really shapes our potentiality and the pace at which we can do that.

What books have had a profound influence on your life or intellectual development?

One was “Guns, Germs, and Steel” by Jared Diamond. It’s a book that I loved for years and years. After I read it, I bought 10 copies and gave them to different people. That’s the only time I ever did that.

The book comes back to this idea, what is the dumb luck that you’re handed? The thesis is: where biology and geography intersect became our destiny. I found it totally fascinating.

More recently, there are a bunch of thinkers over these last 10 years who are either researching or implementing or writing variations on this incredible economic transition that we’re in.

There are people like Yochai Benkler and “The Wealth of Networks.” Jeremy Rifkin, Chris Anderson of Wired and I share a lot of ideas. Tim O’Reilly, Lisa Gansky. There’s a whole group of thinkers and doers that are all moving in this same direction, seeing what the underpinnings are, what the new tools are, what the implications of those new tools are.

How do you sleep?

Terribly, because my mind does not shut down. I can fall asleep, and then the second I come out at all, it snaps on. I start thinking about 10 different things, can’t get back to sleep. That’s how I sleep.

Do you have any advice regarding relationships?

The person that you happen to choose as your spouse is so incredibly important. I think women in particular are enablers of bad behavior.

They’re finding a partner when they’re between, say, the ages of 22 and 30. There’s some shaping potential to be done. And yet, they don’t demand their partners take a 50 percent share in household duties, child-rearing, cooking, whatever it is. So the enabling starts. Then they work themselves into a corner.

I was giving a talk the other day to all these veterans who are entrepreneurs. They were 92 percent male. As I was talking, it suddenly occurred to me that, when men also don’t learn how to be competent at child-rearing and these other activities, they are covertly telling their spouse — who is supposed to be the person they love the most — “You know what? I’m going to be hobbling your career potential because I’m going to be unskilled and useless.”

I feel like it’s a value judgment. I want to put the burden also on those men. When they are incompetent or unwilling, they are saying our professional futures are not equal.

How did you adjust your marriage after children?

The world is divided into two groups: people who have children and people who don’t. It is night and day, having children and not having children. I think of children as “human objects” until the age of like 14 [laughs], i.e., 24 hours a day, every second, you are responsible for them.

The way I’m living now [no longer with young children], every morning I wake up and think — how incredible! I can lie in this bed, or I can get up! I can change my mind! I can leave the house. I can make appointments. I can travel.

When you are with children, that is all locked down. The freedom of your life is just dramatically different. I certainly did not appreciate it. And when I had my first child, I thought, whoa. No one clued me in on what a giant hit having this child is on my personal autonomy, which impacts my ambition in life, professional potential, and so on. It is a giant hit.

Is there a particular reason you chose to have three children?

Greed. [laughter] I used to work in public health. I was allowed my 2.2 children. Then I hid my third pregnancy for as long as I could because I thought, my god, this is greedy. This is antisocial. This is a total embarrassment. Yeah.

Also, I’m laughing about three children. My husband was less for it than I. I thought, two children is just so easy. [laughter] Life is so pat, you know. Two in front, two in back! It’s one adult, one child; it’s so simple. Let’s shake things up here. So that was also why I had a third child. To make life more akilter.

Have you taken any travel journeys that you would recommend to others?

A really instructive thing is to have Americans understand what a totally different economy and different GDP look like on the ground, living it. We’ve done a number of vacations where it’s been this six-dollar-a-night type of place, a treehouse, a cruddy place in the corner.

My son had this great line. He said, “Wow, people can be really happy without money.” And I just thought, yes. Bingo. Let’s get that.

It comes back to this privileged life. I want to say 90 percent of the time, when I step into my warm shower, I’m thinking, how incredible. I am standing here, and there’s this running water, and it is warm. What an amazing thing.

I honestly think about it almost every time I take a shower. Or wow, I’m lying down on a flat bed, and these sheets are so clean. I’m appreciating that all the time.

How are you approaching aging?

What’s curious is around age 52, I suddenly started to think about old age. I had never ever thought about it at all. You never picture yourself there. And suddenly, at this really late age, I thought, wow. My eyesight is declining, my knees creak.

I’ve realized that there’s a whole bunch of women in their 70s that are really fabulous. And I thought, I’d like to be one of those really fabulous women in their 70s. But in order to be a fabulous woman in your 70s, it means that I have to be intellectually astute and up and active and engaged now.

Is there anything else you wanted to discuss?

Yes. Addressing climate change. Let’s get with the program. Right now, this very moment that we’re sitting here, it’s either we make dramatic changes or we’re moving into a catastrophic world.

It’s not your grandchildren. It’s 20 years. In 20 years, it’s going to be a really sucky world out there. The reality is so extreme that my saying this makes people think, “You can’t trust Robin because she’s gone out of her mind.”

It is honestly a crazy reality. It is catastrophic. We’re seeing institutions one by one acknowledge it — the World Bank, the U.N., the IPCC and Obama — but it’s couched in these little careful terms.

As we’re sitting here, the highest likelihood is that we will go to between plus-7 degrees Fahrenheit and plus-10 degrees Fahrenheit global climate change by 2100. What in the heck does that mean?

Minus-7 degrees Fahrenheit was the last Ice Age 50 million years ago. Humans did not exist. And Boston and New York and most of North America was under one kilometer of ice.

So we went from one kilometer of ice, 50 million years ago, no humans — we are going to that amount of change in 85 years.

That’s what we’re doing right this second. Even 40 years out is looking pretty rotten. And that’s if we do the things that we promised to do. If we don’t do those things, which is exceptionally likely, it’s in 20 years. It is not some distant thing, and it is not some small amount. This is ecosystem collapse.

So one of the things I think about Zipcar is that people realized, sharing resources leads to a better world. I have a better quality of life. I save money. And it actually has this dramatically strong environmental underpinning. So we can go there proactively, making it as best as we can, or not.

I think you do go through these seven stages of acceptance. And I think people are, right now, all around in the giant denial. If they aren’t in a giant denial, they’re in the pissed off phase. And we have to move through that and get to — let’s get going. Let’s do it.

Transcription services by Tigerfish; now offering transcripts in two-hours guaranteed. Interview text has been edited and condensed.

sophia project

Sophia is a project to collect life lessons from fascinating people. Learn more or sign up to receive lessons for living directly via Facebook or our email newsletter.

Here’s more from Sophia:
He Asked 1500+ Elders For Advice On Living And Loving. Here’s What They Told Him.
Life Tips From The Ph.D. Who’s Discovering How Meditation Changes Your Brain
Watching Rainn Wilson Talk About Happiness Will Make You Happier

Drug Dealers Are Using Nokia Dumbphones To Stay Ahead Of "The Feds"

According to a story from the UK edition of Vice (a story which, I hasten to add, relies on a source named ‘K2’ and should therefore be taken with the requisite gallon of salt), drug dealers in the fair city of Birmingham have turned to dumphones in an attempt to evade the police.

Read more…



Daily Roundup: Apple outsells Samsung, Microsoft invests in Android and more!

Apple sold as many phones as Samsung did last quarter; Microsoft is investing in Android; and SkyMall might be saved. Head past the break to find all of today’s top stories in the Daily Roundup….

Coolbox is a toolbox for your gadgets (and tools)

Coolers have received a modern makeover, and so why not the trusty ol’ toolbox? Enter the Coolbox, a toolbox for your tools and gadgets with some oft-used integrated technologies. LED lights, for example, are built into the toolbox to provide light when needed, and the lid has a magnet inside that’ll keep loose hardware (like nuts and bolts) in place. … Continue reading

5 Signs of a Bad Marriage No One Talks About

While our culture gets criticized for being too pro-divorce, I’d like to counter that criticism and say we are a culture of over-tolerance. We tolerate bad behavior and bad relationships for far too long.

We are rewarded for “sticking it out” and are scolded by our society if we don’t. I am often amazed to hear what my clients and readers tolerate in a marriage, and how they feel guilty for even having thoughts of ending the relationship.

Perhaps religion, our childhood influencers or the media interfere with our definition of a good marriage versus a bad one. To me, it’s pretty simple. One makes you happy and the other makes you miserable.

But first, let’s define a good marriage:

  1. You are each other’s best friend. You like to do things together and enjoy being in each other’s company, even if it’s the most mundane event.
  2. You feel safe to express any emotion. Whether you’re happy, proud, tired, or sad, you trust that your partner will hear you, without negating you. Your partner revels in your joy or empathizes in your pain but regardless, you know you can safely express any feeling.
  3. You allow each other the freedom to grow. As you move throughout each decade, your tastes and wants are bound to change. What interested you 10 years ago may no longer interest you now, and your partner encourages you to explore. You both are willing to give each other the space to spread your wings.
  4. You find each other attractive. No matter your current age or size, there is still that spark between you. Passion, although you may have less time for it, is still a priority and you make time for intimacy.
  5. You argue but you argue well. Even if the disagreement results in a one-day reprieve from each other, you find a resolution to where you both feel heard.
  6. You are a couple, but still remain independent. While you both enjoy time together, you allow each other time to be with or travel with other friends, enjoy hobbies, or simple alone time.
  7. You divide chores evenly. Both of you maintain roles that will make a successful household, and are equally willing to be flexible should one chore not get done and then work as a team.

No marriage is perfect, but hopefully your marriage reflects some or all of the above points.

But what if it doesn’t? How do you know if your marriage is in real turmoil versus just having a few bumps in the road?

Here are some signs you are in a bad marriage:

  1. You are fearful of rage over the smallest problem. You are verbally abused or worse, physically abused, following an incident that an average person may perceive as minor. Your partner can’t handle stress and takes everything out on you to where you walk on egg shells and avoid all conflict.
  2. You are afraid of or avoid sex entirely. You either must be drunk to have sex or you don’t want it at all, but you give in just because you’re married, and that’s what a spouse should do. (And to note: you should never be forced to have sex with anyone, even if you are married to them. It is rape if you say ‘no’ and are forced unwillingly).
  3. You must endure endless passive aggressive behavior. It’s one thing to be snippy at each other, but another if every form of communication is a stab at your inadequacy or inability to function as an adult. Should you forget to take out the trash, comments like, “Of course you forgot, you always do” or, “No wonder I have to take care of everything, you can’t even do a simple chore,” can make you feel devalued and impotent.
  4. You keep secrets. You withhold information that you would rather share, but you’re afraid of being bullied or insulted. You might have connected with an old friend, bought something special just for you, or attended an event that would be disapproving so you lie and said you were elsewhere. Secrets that shouldn’t be secrets become so voluminous that they create profound loneliness within you.
  5. You resent each other. Everything you both do results in a negative comment or insult. The resentfulness feels like a constant tennis match of name calling and bickering, and you’ve lost track of who started it. (Note: you may have noticed that the invitations to dinner parties are dwindling because your friends are sick of it too).

If you find yourself in this latter category, ask yourself, “Why am I putting up with this? Don’t I deserve better?” Do all you can to immerse each other in counseling and problem solving, but if your situation does not improve, you don’t have to tolerate it, just because you’re married. If you feel guilty for ending it, you should feel more guilty that you let yourself be treated poorly.

Over-tolerance of bad behavior is largely ignored by our culture and instead, we are praised for enduring it. You are allowed to set healthy boundaries for yourself and whoever taught you otherwise is just plain wrong. If you find yourself nodding in acknowledgement that your marriage is really bad, get out now.

You are worth so much more.

Lindsey Ellison is a women’s divorce and break up coach, and specializes in helping them break free from their narcissistic partners. For more information, click here.

Saying Goodbye To 'Parenthood' Is The Biggest Tear-Jerker Of All

For the last of our goodbye “Parenthood” posts, HuffPost Entertainment editors Lauren Duca and Lily Karlin sat down to review the series finale and final season as a whole, while feeling all the feelings and crying all the tears. Spoilers below.

Lauren Duca: I actually can’t believe “Parenthood” is over. What the hell are we going to shamelessly cry over now? I watched the finale on the elliptical, because I thought maybe cardio and weeping were incompatible. I. was. wrong. I lost it over that final montage cutting to the future, as the family sprinkled Zeek’s ashes on the baseball field. The whole thing made me feel kind of guilty, since I spent this entire season thinking it all would end with the Cycle of Life arc (e.g. Zeek dying and Amber giving birth). This wasn’t the best season. It’s actually easily my least favorite. But for where we were at this point, I think that ending was everything I could have wanted for our goodbye from the Bravermans.

224phood

Lily Karlin: I am totally with you. The critical side of my brain definitely had some issues with the episode: Why was so much stuffed into the very last hour if the writers knew from the start this was their final season? Am I supposed to be fully sold on Adam’s sudden teaching destiny? But, as I’ve discovered with the past couple shaky seasons of the show, I just don’t really care. The episode hooked me 100 percent emotionally, which is the true test of an effective “Parenthood” hour, and by the time the (admittedly corny) flash-future montage was over, my tear ducts were completely emptied out.

Can I also admit that despite all the press to the contrary, I actually deluded myself into thinking that Zeek might live through the end of the episode? I think I was subconsciously trying to protect my heart from the pain.

LD: May God bless and keep you … and convince you to leave critical thinking out of this, Lily! LOL, but you’re right. If this was a few episodes back, I would have *rolled around on the floor* when they started playing “Ave Maria” during the kids-at-the-school-succeeding-in-tasks montage last week. “AVE FRICKIN’ MARIA.” (It’s like some guy in the writer’s room had been begging to add that in since the first episode, and finally they were like, “Okay, fine, Jim, this can be our ‘Ave’ moment!”) It would be too much in any other context. And, somehow, the finale topped one “Ave Maria” unit of ham-fisted sentimentality, but it worked. After a six-season roller coaster of emotions, we needed our sappy goodbye to the Bravermans.

Also: same. I was convinced from episode one of this season that Zeek was dead, and I still couldn’t deal with it (on the elliptical). The way this season dealt with one central issue that affected the whole family made the “Parenthood” balance feel off. It’s always been about mixing the drama with comedy. In earlier seasons — and this was off in Season 5, too — it was like Jason Katims took happiness and sadness and stirred them together in a slow cooker of feelings. This most recent season was just so weighted down with Zeek’s impending death, it threw off that equilibrium. At the same time, I don’t know what else would have yielded a satisfying resolution. My thoughts on the finale are the same as my thoughts about a pint of ice cream after a breakup: I don’t know how we got here, but this bucket of sweetness is exactly what I need right now.

phood9

LK: Yeah, exactly. I feel like that “Ave Maria” scene sums up this latter half of “Parenthood” Season 6: you’re rolling your eyes in your head about how on the nose it is, but you are also totally sobbing and just want to give everyone a hug so it’s obviously doing the trick. The last episode — which, can we talk about it being called “May God Bless and Keep You Always”? Because OH MY GOD — was kind of like a goodbye tour for the show where everyone got to find their true purpose in life and take lots of emotional photos along the way, aka very fitting for the “Parenthood” we know and love. There were so many cute shots at the wedding with all the different nuclear family contingents posed for pictures, and I was also super into Sydney and Nora hanging out and dancing. ALERT TO BRAVERMAN FAMILY: we would like an invite to the next wedding, which seems like it may be between Amber, and um, Jason Street? Girl has a soft spot for the men of “Friday Night Lights.” How did you feel about where everyone ended up in the picture-perfect flash forwards? It was kind of funny that it was just like BABIES BABIES BABIES!!!! Like, one 11th hour Julia-Joel baby wasn’t enough. In the flash forward, they’ve got another! (I guess the one million babies in the flash future is kind of the life-death cycle you were talking about, but just like even more extreme than just the baby we knew coming was coming the whole season.)

LD: It was a festival of babies, and probably every last one was named Zeek! The finale tied everything up so neatly (and, like you said, apparently that meant feeding Adam a deep passion for teaching and also soufflé). Although, I have to wonder if there is a “realistic” version of any of that (Adam making water?) that would have left us satisfied.

Can we talk a minute to look back at the series as a whole? There were so many moments in there that feel buried in the totality of the show, because there is so much obvious greatness in the series. It’s hard not to tear up just reading about Kristina’s breast cancer storyline, and Max’s was easily the most groundbreaking Asperger’s narrative we’ve seen on TV. I’d like to resurrect a few things less memorable than that while we’re here, talking “P.Hood” for the last time.

The first is Drew and Amy’s post-high school storyline. When she leaves school and comes to stay with him indefinitely, the two of them fall apart in a cycle of co-dependence that is one of the darkest and most authentic representations of teenage life I have ever seen. It wasn’t a hallmark of even that season, but it’s worth recognizing the strides made there in juxtaposition to the melodramatic standard of adolescent programming. The second thing I’d like to note is Haddie bringing home her girlfriend (Tavi!) That felt so rushed, and Jason Katims said himself he wish he had more time with it. I would have liked to see this show deal with that in more than just a third of an episode. And yet, that regret makes me realize how intricate it was overall. The cast has approximately 1,000 people. And each nuclear family has had its own set of issues to work through, in addition to secondary conflicts among the core siblings, and all of that was woven into the grounded tapestry that was the arc of the show. The other day, my dad said, “‘Parenthood’ deals with more in a single episodes than most shows do in whole series.” I think he’s right. Especially in terms of (the super common) family drama, it really distinguished itself by both the issues it chose to handle and how it chose to handle them.

32phood

LK: Drew and Amy’s storyline and Haddie and Lauren’s nod were definitely two of the show’s strongest portrayals of teen struggles. At times “Parenthood,” like other LESSER shows, suffered from what I call Teen Girls Are Crazy syndrome, where teen girls are portrayed as erratic creatures with behavior motivated by “wacko hormones” instead of goals, obstacles and circumstances like, you know, other humans. (Amber and Haddie sometimes in early seasons, Ruby … as an entity.) I thinks it stands out so much with “Parenthood” because the show otherwise thrives on creating subtle-relationship based drama, and because the actors are so good that they bring super grounded performances to even too broad moments of characterization. In terms of both stellar aspects of the series that are a little less talked about and stellar storylines about teenagers, I’ve also always had a particular soft spot for the show’s exploration of Drew and Amber’s relationships with Seth. They were always drawn as having nuanced, ambivalent feelings about their absent father where other shows may have made them one-note angry. I feel like disillusionment with a parent (Drew) and letting go of resentment toward a parent (Amber) are really hard/truthful parts of growing up that aren’t explored that much on television.

Childhood, man. Parenthood. Childhood becoming Parenthood. (Probably an alternate title for the finale.)

phood7

LD: Don’t even talk to me about that one-dimensional, straight-haired angst machine! I just do not have the room in my “Parenthood” heart. Amber and Haddie definitely fell into that trap earlier on, though. I don’t think it’s enough for, like, a “‘Parenthood’ Has a Teenage Girl Problem” think piece. But those failings are there and it’s actually just disappointing because this show was so wonderfully nuanced (as you said) and I would expect more from it in that area. I wish it had more time to explore adolescence in general.

There’s so much we can pick from looking at the series as a whole. Does anything stick out to you? Should we move on to our last look at the finale?

LK: There’s so much we could go into when talking about the whole show, but maybe we’ll leave it at our discussion of “under-discussed” elements and let the many recaps and analytic pieces the internet has amassed over the years do the rest. (As much as I COULD talk about “Parenthood” in great detail for, like, ever.)

In terms of the finale, I will say I felt particularly grateful for two things. The first is that they have Crosby decide to keep the Luncheonette open without Adam. I feel like that idea has had a major lack of acknowledgement over the past couple episodes when it’s just been like, “Oh, both of us don’t want to do it? Then it’s OVER.” I understand monetarily it would raise challenges, but it just didn’t seem like it would be the most far-fetched thing in the “Parenthood” universe for Crosby to get another investor to go in with him, or “figure out a way,” like he finally does with the whole renting out space plan. I’m also SO GRATEFUL that they had Grandma and Grandpa Braverman invite Amber and the baby to live with them. I’ve been really worried about Amber having this baby while living in a studio with a sliding door with, like, no job and no money and no help. (I know I just said things work out in the “Parenthood” universe, and that now she is the “new Crosby,” etc., but that still seems like it would be a a while before that job was making good money and also like, hours, childcare, etc. HAVING A BABY IS HARD, “Parenthood.”)

I was also glad to see Sarah Ramos return for a few minutes. The generation of young actors on “Parenthood” — Mae Whitman, Sarah Ramos, Miles Heizer — are all so good. I love watching them in scenes together (and also hanging out on Instagram).

phood8

LD: Oh, Mae and Miles are brother and sister in real life and don’t tell me any different, because I won’t hear it. (They really do live together, though!)

That cast is excellent. I also had hesitations about Amber having a baby. I mean, girl was living in basically a storage unit up until that offer from Camille and Zeek. I did think it was interesting the way they used Matt Lauria (Ryan) in that flash forward, though! Instead of simply pairing them up, it functioned as almost a second generation redemption for the heartbreaking failure that was Seth. (Also, as you mentioned, Jason Street can now walk again!)

Of all the things “Parenthood” has telegraphed, I’m happiest they used the baseball callback. Zeek mentioned that a few episodes back, when Adam was like “What will happen to us when you die?” (Um, you will keep on living and having a family because you are an adult?) That was really perfect for me. Using those last moments for the happiness of remembrance and togetherness rather than for wallowing. I swear, when he died, the first thing I did was check the time and make sure there weren’t enough minutes left for a funeral …

phood11

LK: Yeah, totally agree about Matt Lauria. It was unexpected but it was nice to see that Ryan was okay, but that it didn’t mean he and Amber have to end up together. Life can go on and she can marry Jason Street. I’m glad they handled Zeek’s death in the way they did, although like I said earlier, I almost didn’t believe he was dead until the final scene at the baseball diamond. Even when Camille was approaching the chair, I said out loud to the screen, “Please just be asleep.” That would have been terrible television, but, oh my God, I just wanted Zeek to live and them to all play baseball TOGETHER.

But as it was, it was the perfect bittersweet goodbye to a show that really mastered bittersweet television. I will definitely miss watching “Parenthood” each week, and wish the Bravermans all the best in their fictional universe lives.

I also don’t handle saying goodbye to TV shows well, so it’s likely I’ll begin a rewatch of the series from episode 1 in the very imminent future. Thank you, TV, for in your own way lasting forever.

phood10

LD: Ugh, yes. I think, ultimately, “Parenthood” is a show that thrives even in the arcs where it lacks precision of storytelling or development of individual characters. The value comes in the sum of its parts and the way it makes us feel. I know I joke about that. I have wrote “cry the tears” and “feel the feelings” so many times covering this show. But there’s something beautiful about Jason Katims ability to let us feel like it’s okay to do just that.

Get The Most Out Of Your Run With These 5 Gadgets

Running TechnologyThere isn’t a part of our lives that technology doesn’t touch in some way. Our workouts are no different, and the latest tech could mean more efficiency and better results. From smart socks to biometric clothing, the latest running technology can not only help you track your workouts, but it can help illuminate a lot about your running style and what you’re getting out of your runs. Check out these 5 gadgets that will help you to get more out of your runs.

This Fleet Of Micro-Satellites Will Use GPS To Predict The Weather

This Fleet Of Micro-Satellites Will Use GPS To Predict The Weather

Weather forecasting is one of those sciences that never seems to be quite as good as we want it to be. But what if it had more data? That’s the idea behind Spire, a tech startup which wants to use a huge fleet of tiny, cheap satellites to tell you when it’s going to rain.

Read more…



OnePlus will reveal its 'OxygenOS' February 12th

As Cyanogen moves along a new path (apparently with help from Microsoft) phone maker OnePlus is working on its own flavor of Android, and now it has a name: OxygenOS. Unfortunately, it doesn’t have much else beyond promises of going back to the drawi…

Of course 'Law & Order: SVU' is doing a GamerGate episode

Actually, it’s not about ethics in games journalism. NBC’s Law & Order: SVU will air an episode titled “Intimidation Game” on February 11th, and unless you’ve been living under a rock the circumstances will be pretty familiar. In a plotline following…