Never Again Must Begin With Never Forget

Seventy years ago, the Soviet Red Army reached the Polish town of Oswiecim and broke through the gates of the camp that would become synonymous with the most heinous crimes of the Nazi genocide. Every year, on January 27, the day that Auschwitz was liberated and the magnitude of its evil was revealed, the international community commemorates the Holocaust and commits once more to learning its lessons. And this year for the occasion, a British network decided to pose the question in its live weekly panel show, “Is it time to lay the Holocaust to rest?”

Yes, its only a question, not a statement. And yes, there were several members of the panel, including Rabbis and survivors who spoke forcefully and eloquently for why such a notion was absurd. One could make a case that the show was intended to enforce that point. However, even as a question, the subject of the show made clear that rather than just a task of educating about the lessons of the Holocaust, we now have the ever more difficult task of reinforcing why it is the Holocaust that stands as a unique source for learning the lessons in the first place.

Both Jews and other peoples have suffered and do suffer greatly at other times and in other places. Not enough ink exists to describe the examples of callous cruelty visited by one person on another nor the way one people has profited from the enslaving and brutalization of another. And yet never before seen was the Holocaust’s mobilization of an entire society to reduce millions of its neighbors first to subhuman status and then to ashes. The lessons of the Holocaust are universal, but the scope and breadth of what befell its victims is quite particular.

Remembering the Jewish victims of the Holocaust does not shut the door on recognizing evils perpetrated against others, whether by the Nazis or in our time. However, to truly not forget the Holocaust means to also be vigilant against the easy way in which some other acts or conflicts are easily compared with it. War crimes, hatred, murder, discrimination. Each and every one of these is a great danger and an injustice that must be countered. Being inspired by “Never Again” is a powerful part of opposing these travesties, whether for Jews or others. But taking up the cry of “ever Again” does not mean that the injustice being fought against encompasses what the Nazis carried out and what they planned to perpetrate against their victims.

The Biblical episode of Amalek, because of its extreme language and the emphasis on memory, has become singularly associated with the evil of the Nazi Holocaust. Amalek is a nation that falls upon the Israelites as they are weak, targeting the infirm and the vulnerable and showing no mercy. While the full description of the encounter occurs in the Torah we read this week, it is later, in the Book of Deuteronomy, that the Jewish people are commanded to never forget the cruelty of Amalek. Zachor Asher Asa L’cha Amalek, Remember what Amalek did… This command can and often is taken as a sweeping statement of the need for vigilance against those who would prey on the weak and wreak havoc without regard for human life. But more exactly the Hebrew reads, “Remember what Amalek did to you.” This is not just about a broad category of those who do evil. This is also about remembering what it felt like to have evil done “to you.”

I do not commemorate what Amalek did to me in order to live in the past or to remain stuck only in my own experience. That said, the choice between remembering the specifics of the Holocaust and “laying it to rest” for the sake of moving on, is false. I hold on to the command to remember what Amalek did to me to ensure that I never shrug off evil in the world as someone elses problem. Achieving Never Again, in all its facets, begins with the commitment to Never Forget.

Moms Confess 20 More F'ed Up Things Their Kids Have Done

While you’re still reveling in the optimism of your New Year’s Resolutions, we thought it might be nice to remind you what’s REALLY in store for the rest of 2015. Sure, you’re going to cut back on sugar (good for you!), but while you’re feeling lighter on your feet, your kids will still continue to surprise, disgust and dismay you. Ever notice that kids don’t give a flying one about resolutions? And while we’re sorry to be the bearers of bad news, we bring you a little bit of hope.

Below you’ll read a collection of 20 stories gathered from our show, “The Pump and Dump: A Parentally Incorrect Comedy Show and Night Out, For Once” (you can see more stories here and here). At each show, we provide an index card to audience members and ask them to write down the most f’ed up thing their kid has done, and then we read them aloud on stage. It’s amazingly cathartic, hilarious and completely true.

So, if your resolution was to be a little more zen about the whole parenting thing this year, we think these stories will give you a good boost of morale to keep going and remember that you’re an awesome parent!

(Want to share your own story? Come see us in Los Angeles Feb 4 and Phoenix March 12th!)

We hope you had a good laugh! Check us out online or on Facebook and please do grab your #BREEDER friends and come see us at a show. We promise if you don’t laugh, you can throw breast milk at us.

@media only screen and (min-width : 500px) {.ethanmobile { display: none; }}

Like Us On Facebook |
Follow Us On Twitter |
Contact HuffPost Parents

Also on HuffPost:

NASA Sounding Rocket Studies the Invisible Aurora

“All or Nothing!” that is what my Dean called it; “Just like the shootout at the OK corral, how exciting,” were her final words to me after I described what I would be doing this January in Alaska. I am the Principle Investigator for the NASA Auroral Spatial Structures Probe (ASSP), a 70-foot, four-stage unmanned rocket loaded with scientific instruments sitting on the launch pad now in Alaska. After four years of planning, building and testing at NASA Wallops Flight Facility and at the Utah State University Space Dynamics Laboratory, it is all coming down to a call, my call, as to when to launch.

The aurora borealis is beautiful, awe-inspiring, and far more dynamic and crisp than pictures seem to capture. Those who see it for the very first time often comment on how much it moves in the sky and how detailed the structure of the curtains are and how quickly it can evolve into whole new patterns. They say it is more than they expected.

Yet the aurora is not just the pretty lights of what we call “the visible aurora.” There is an unseen structure of voltages and flowing currents in which the visible aurora is embedded and which are not as well understood. The existence of these currents has been detected since antiquity through the slight tremor of magnetic compass needles when the aurora was active. Now we use sub-orbital rockets or satellites flying in or above the aurora to study these invisible voltages and currents. This current NASA mission is a whole new approach to making these types of measurements and has great promise in advancing our understanding of the invisible aurora and its relation to those ethereal curtains of light.

The basic idea behind this flight was to launch a rocket into an active aurora and then deploy multiple sensors in mid-flight to do something that’s never been done before. Shortly after the fourth stage burned out, six sub-payloads, each about the size of a loaf of bread, were ejected away from the main rocket at high velocity using compressed air canons. This expanding formation of sensors arced high over the aurora, measuring voltages and currents.

The whole mission only lasted about 14 minutes with about eight of those minutes dedicated to science collection. After reaching an altitude of 600 km — about half as high as the International Space Station — the sensors and spent rocket boosters splashed down in the Arctic Ocean north of Alaska. The goal was to fly over the aurora somewhere near the north coast.

ASSP was the most complex sounding rocket mission NASA has ever done. It was like flying seven sounding rockets at once over the aurora. NASA even had to bring in additional telemetry dishes and equipment to the Poker Flat Research Range to augment the existing capability.

Prior to the launch, weather conditions around Fairbanks were poor with a winter storm blocking the views from our ground-based cameras. Once the skies cleared, we were able to make a prediction of what the aurora was likely to do over a 15-minute period.

We only had one shot, and even after using all of our best information and prediction methods, there were always elements of chance. The aurora can completely change, brighten, move, or disappear in just a few minutes. In a way, this was like a shootout, but a shootout with only one bullet.

With the rocket perched skyward on its rail, bundled up from the cold inside a warm foam box, we waited for just the right opportunity to launch. We held the launch count at T-3 minutes for some time waiting for the right conditions. Once it became clear that this was the right auroral event to launch into, I said to the team ‘It is time to spend this rocket.’ There were several strong arcs over the north coast of Alaska. It was spectacular to get the arcs we wanted.

At T-1 minute I gave the authorization to go for launch and ran outside to see it go up with my own eyes. At exactly 1:41 a.m. Alaska Time on Wednesday, January 28, we counted down to T-minus zero and launched into the aurora.

It was stunning. The sound was a body-penetrating roar, significantly delayed because I was a mile away looking down at the launch pad. All four stages went beautifully. It was such a relief to have the rocket away. I then ran back inside to watch the all-sky cameras to see if we were going to be successful flying our formation of seven sensors over the arcs.

The aurora we launched into did not read the textbooks and did not develop at the rate we expected. It seemed to be a slow motion development with the arcs breaking up over Poker Flat and then reforming further north over and over until they were at the north coast of Alaska. We launched just as they arrived and they remained constant for the 10 minutes it took the rocket to reach them.

I thought it would be a terrifying wait, but I was quite calm. The event contented to develop strongly and it was clear that we were going to get our science. It is a great privilege to have been part of this very special mission that so many had worked on for so long.

The telemetry data shows that we successfully ejected all of the payloads and created the constellation of sensors that we needed. We flew over the aurora as planned, and it was a stunning success for such a complicated mission.

The ejection of the sub-payloads by the compressed air-spring cannons is so violent that they had to be done in pairs in opposite directions so as not to send the main payload spinning out of control with the kick back. This was new technology devolved just for this mission by NASA.

I have had many congratulations from my colleagues around the country who are asking for quick-look plots of the data.

This has been a six-year effort and to see it all come down to 14 minutes was almost too much to bear. But it was a successful 14 minutes, and it is now a very satisfying feeling. To be part of a raging success by a team composed of so many organizations is humbling. We did it!

'There Is Nothing Standing In Our Way'

“We can truly do whatever it is we want to do. There is nothing standing in our way.” — Gloria Steinem

Another (a)typical morning in the life of a morphmom. Somewhere in the middle of my third hour-long round-trip to my son’s school to drop off the third forgotten school item (too much to ask that all three be remembered at the same time), fueled by as many cups of coffee (mostly milk and high-calorie vanilla flavoring, but three’ll get the job done) on the heels of a very late, not very productive evening, I’m hit with something that is either a bolt from the blue or sugar shock, but, in any event, produces an epiphany.

Heretofore, I’d conceptualized the “morphmom” movement as a growing wave of individual moms who’ve managed, in a brave new world, to successfully juggle the stay-at-home approach to parenting while at the same time achieving whatever it is they’ve always wanted to do from a professional/creative standpoint, and now have the desire to pay it forward and help others do the same. But as I downed my last gulp of latte that morning, I realized that, while we morphmoms are, to be sure, pioneers and rugged individualists, to one degree or another, we all stand on the shoulders of our “foremothers” — decades upon decades of “proto-morphmoms” who’ve been paying it forward for the last century or more.

And it dawned on me that the definition of “morphmom” is in some ways much broader than I’d previously realized; surely, it must include the hundreds of thousands of women who came before us, battling every obstacle along the way, making our path clearer with each win, large and small. Generations of mothers who strove mightily in a climate much less accepting of what they were trying to achieve than the 21st century America that they helped to create.

Recently, I had the pleasure of attending an event sponsored by Citi Private Bank’s Diversity Committee, with the support of Jay Yost, an ultra high net worth banker in New York, featuring Gloria Steinem as the keynote speaker. (Among the many subjects that Ms. Steinem touched on: the still-unadopted Equal Rights Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.)

But when Ms. Steinem, always a compelling speaker, concluded her remarks, things took a turn for the surreal. Naz Vahid, head of the Citi Private Bank’s Law Firm group, who ran the event and to whom I am (for reasons about to become apparent) eternally grateful, actually gave morphmom — my own tiny little fledgling contribution toward improving the lives of working women – a shout-out on the very same stage on which Gloria Steinem still stood. Wow.

But wait, there’s more. As if I weren’t already humbled, honored and embarrassed enough, things suddenly went from merely surreal to Chris Nolan-esque, “Inception”-level dreamlike when Gloria Steinem herself not only acknowledged morphmom from the podium, but asked me a question.

More accurately, she asked me to pose a question to all those potential employers out there who don’t appear, shall we say, overly anxious to make a place in their organizations for us morphmoms:

“Have you ever raised a child?

2015-01-22-IMG_08792.jpg
Gloria Steinem addressing the crowd to further the initiatives of the ERA Coalition

I looked around the room. Of the over 200 women in attendance, ranging in age from 15 to 80, hailing from all walks of life, socio-economic and professional backgrounds, I knew that there was at least one who could answer Ms. Steinem’s question – nay, her challenge – with a resounding, “Yes, I have!”

Naz.

Naz Vahid is an amazing woman, professional, friend and morphmom extraordinaire. Growing up, Naz always dreamed of becoming a journalist. But when, at the age of 15, the Iranian revolution brought her to the United States, achieving that particular dream became an almost insurmountable challenge. With English as a second language, journalism was not going to be the easiest of professions to break into in her adopted home. Naz, never easily deterred, continued to pursue it nonetheless.

Then, in the spring of her freshman year of college, fate intervened. Although she had no particular interest in the subject, Naz was forced to take an economics class out of lack of other options. Against all of her expectations, it was a match made in heaven; Naz immediately fell in love with the discipline. Her dreams suddenly shifted, and now she wanted nothing more than to put her new-found passion for economics and her multilingual communications skills to work at the World Bank. Saddled, however, with the now almost ubiquitous burden of student debt, when a job offer materialized from Citibank, it proved an offer Naz simply couldn’t refuse.

As it turned out, in an incredible testament to both Naz and the institution, she never looked back. Once again, her dreams morphed: now, her goal was to succeed HERE. But the institution she’s come to love, and through whose ranks she’s risen inexorably over the past almost 30 years, was a very different place when Naz first arrived in 1985. Different today, in no small part, because of Naz’s own efforts and contributions.

1994. Naz, a first generation American woman aspiring to be a banker, needs a sponsor. When she asks her manager for his recommendation, she’s told that, as a woman, especially one with a “strange” name, she would never fit in. Undaunted, she goes above his head and receives the recommendation. But that’s not all. Before long, she’s become her erstwhile naysayer’s boss! (Years later, he’ll admit his mistake.)

Two years later, Naz has morphed yet again and become a mom. But with this most wonderful gift — the adoption of her daughter — more obstacles arose at the office, where many of the decisionmakers were still of a generation not yet ready to fully embrace moms in the professional workforce. For years, working mothers had been part of the administrative staff. But while the professional ranks were increasingly populated by strong, successful women, those who were at the same time raising children were still a relative rarity.

As a result, the organization simply wasn’t wired for the modern professional/mom. Among other things, adoption didn’t qualify for maternity leave. Luckily for Naz, she was blessed with a forward-thinking boss — a father of three daughters — who “allowed” her to take two weeks. Less than two decades ago, and these were the sorts of headwinds that the proto-morphmoms still faced.

But fast-forward to 2014, and you’ll find Naz reflecting on her time at Citi with not just well-deserved pride, but a broad smile. Because, while the headwinds were strong, Citi was, as an institution, willing and able — with the help of Naz and many of her colleagues — to adapt and evolve. Now, thanks in no small part to Naz and others like her, they’re ready for us. Today, adoption leave is mandated and every bit as well-accepted as maternity leave. The burgeoning ranks of female managers increasingly have the flexibility to say, “I’m leaving early today” to see a child’s game or make it home for bedtime. They will, of course, work that much harder — finishing the day’s work from home when all others are asleep — but that is what we do as mothers. We get things done.

Here’s how far Citi, and many other (although still too few) forward-looking major American corporations, have come through the efforts of Naz and the other proto-morphmoms across the country and across the decades: A few years back, Naz, exhausted after a long tour of duty traveling on business, was offered the opportunity to work from home on Fridays. She never even had to ask. Indeed, all around Citi, there are employees occupying “team leader” and other positions of enormous responsibility, who work from home several days a week, and a global work strategies program where employees can make requests for formal flexible work plans. In this brave new world, where the morphmoms are now beginning to dictate, rather than having to accommodate, the rules of engagement, Citi and other large institutions with foresight are figuring out – where so many other potential employers continue to struggle — how to maintain the loyalty and commitment – and thus to retain the boundless talent — of we mothers with a yen to do more.

Joy Leff, yet another amazing professional and friend, a Senior Vice President in the Citi Private Bank Law Firm group, testifies eloquently, and with deep gratitude, to the incredible achievements of Naz and women like her who paved the way. Joy, newly married, joined Citi four years ago. The organization at which she arrived was one where, it was immediately apparent, she perceived that neither gender nor motherhood were obstacles to advancement. From the start, it was clear to Joy that proving yourself to your client was what mattered. Just imagine if Naz’s first boss, all those years ago when she first arrived at Citi, had been not a man immersed in hidebound notions of what qualities were essential to success, but – Naz herself! That’s the institution that Joy had the good fortune to join.

Naz and Joy have a wonderful working relationship, but, until the three of us got to discussing morphmom one day, had never had occasion to talk together about Naz’s journey or Joy’s perspective. For me, it was incredibly exciting to hear these two women sharing their experiences – one among the architects and the other the beneficiary of the current, vastly-improved conditions, and both of them ready, willing and able to take it to the next level. Both share great hope – and optimism — for the future. As Naz reflected, perhaps her daughter will arrive in a future where her desire for motherhood – if that’s what she desires — will never even factor into the equation as she considers the limits on her professional choices or possibilities. Perhaps, it will actually broaden them.

2015-01-22-photo13.JPG

Pictured: Naz Vahid and Joy Leff

I can’t help but think that Naz, if she were a little less humble, might feel, as she reflects back on all that she’s achieved, just a little bit like Ms. Steinem must.

For more amazing morphmom stories, please visit http://morphmom.com

Cuba and Education: Is There a Lesson Here?

Despite federal policies in education, increased standardized testing of students and futile strategies to bring “competition” into the education marketplace, it is clear that there is a high correlation in the United States between the education achievement gap and poverty.

In 2002, my friend and colleague, Dr. Kate Moody, jumped at the chance to travel to Cuba by tagging along with fellow academics to a conference on economics (not her field). Kate is a literacy expert, recently named by the Center of Media Literacy as one of 20 pioneers in this discipline. Why was she so hot to go to Cuba? She had learned that this poor country, back when 80 percent of its population in rural areas, had long ago attained universal literacy and never looked back. Everyone reads! Sugar cane workers, farmers, all children read!

They also have very high achievement scores in math and science. She was intrigued and intensely curious. How did they do it? There was only one way to find out — go to Cuba. Not a simple task for an American. It took years and jumping through a lot of bureaucratic hoops to get an OFAC license that has allowed her to make fourteen trips to study education on this embargoed island nation. I had lunch with her, the other day, and it was eye-opening.

2015-01-28-KateMoodyinHavana.jpg
VC: What was the state of illiteracy in Cuba before this happened?

KM: According to a UNESCO report issued in 1965 (four years after Castro’s Revolution), before the Revolution there were more than one million adult illiterates( 20% of the population), with 40% of the adult illiterates living in rural areas. The eradication of adult illiteracy was one of the first projects of Fidel Castro, but attention was also paid to schooling for children. Fifty percent of Cuban children did not attend school and there were only 17,000 schools when 35,000 were needed, particularly in the rural areas.

VC: How was this problem confronted by the Castro Government?

KM: Fidel Castro felt that education was one of the most important missions of his Revolution. His first major event was the Great Literacy Campaign of 1961. Castro went before the UN in 1960 and said, “We are going to eradicate illiteracy in Cuba and we will do it in only one year.” There were skeptics galore, but they did it! They did it in one of the most organized literacy campaigns in history. Many countries have had literacy campaigns that show a little progress but then they die down. In this case, they used many assessments including having formerly illiterate people write a letter to Fidel Castro. Then the task became how do we get them from being basically literate to the next stage? They didn’t just declare it a success and quit. They kept on going–for seventy years.

VC: How was such a campaign implemented?

KM: One of the key elements was something they called “mobilization.” It meant organizing people so that they could get trained people to the right place at the right time. Educators designed the program. They recruited volunteers from the ranks of literate people, including teenagers, and trained them so that they could teach beginning reading. Initially they wanted the teacher/student ratio to be 1:2 but that was not practical so they settled for 1:4. Still a pretty effective ratio! The idea was that these young teachers would go into the homes of illiterate people and get them to agree to be taught through wooing, not coercion. The educators developed a curriculum for the campaign, which the volunteer teachers used while practicing good pedagogy for adults so that people wanted to learn. As people reported that they could now read, flags were raised in villages where everyone was literate. As these flags went up, so did national pride. Eventually they got everybody. Then they created follow-up programs so that people didn’t quit but went to the next step to becoming more fluent. They created a newspaper for newly literate adults that would keep them interested.

VC: This was back in the ’60s. What happened once the country was somewhat literate?

KM: The companion goal was to build a public school system. For that they needed to double the number of schools, build them in places where people could get to them, even build roads. It was all very carefully planned. They did this, built 17,000 schools, in less than a decade! “Do it for the Revolution” was very central to the culture, creating a lot of peer pressure to contribute. There has been sustained support for education in Cuba over the past 50 years. The Cuban government has been spending 11% of its national budget on education. Finland spends 6%. The US spends 2%. If this percentage is evidence of political will, Cuba’s investment in education tops the chart. Teachers in Cuba are extremely highly regarded, as they are in Finland. And, as in Finland, all education is public. There are no private schools. The Cuban schools are good by many measures, not just achievement scores, which are high. Other values that are prized are what kind of person you are, your attitude, your cooperation working with others, how you treat foreign visitors. They consider themselves internationalists. They talk about emulation (cooperation) rather than competition. The place is awash in the arts. It’s typical for kids to have arts, music and physical education every day. The curriculum shows an emphasis on science and math.

VC: What is your take-away from your knowledge of Cuban schools?

KM: It is enormously important that all school is free–from infant care, to daycare, to pre-school, through all the grades, the polytechnic institutes, university–even medical school. In Cuba, nobody steps back from school out of fear that the next level isn’t affordable. Whereas we have approximately a 30% drop out rate from high school (in the richest nation on earth) Cubans’ dropout rate is negligible. The class size is rigorously limited to 25 with a goal of only 15 at the junior high level. The healthcare system is carefully orchestrated with the school system with a doctor in every school, and implications for community mental health.

Beyond logistics, Cubans are very proud of their education system and teachers are well respected. I happened to be in Cuba last December 22 which is Teachers Day, a national holiday, in which teachers are honored and showered with gifts and attention.

2015-01-28-KatewithCubanschoolchildren.jpg
Needless to say, Kate Moody has a book in the works on this complex subject, which will be published by University Press of Florida in 2016. Yes, indeed, we have a lot to learn from Cuba.

Senate Democrats Pressure Obama On Overtime Reforms

WASHINGTON — On Thursday, Senate Democrats joined a growing chorus of progressive economists and politicians urging the White House to be aggressive as it expands overtime pay to more U.S. workers.

Following an executive order from President Barack Obama, the Labor Department is revising the rules that govern which salaried workers are entitled to overtime pay after working 40 hours in a week. A critical question hovering over the reforms is where the administration will set the so-called salary threshold. That threshold will ultimately determine how many workers will be eligible for time-and-a-half pay.

Led by Sens. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Democrats in the upper chamber sent a letter to the White House on Thursday recommending a salary threshold of $56,680. (Sanders is an independent who caucuses with Democrats.) That means any salaried worker earning less than that would be entitled to overtime. The current threshold, set by the George W. Bush administration, is $23,660. A mere 11 percent of salaried workers now qualify for time and a half.

“Too many Americans are working longer and harder without anything to show for their efforts in their paychecks,” the lawmakers wrote. “These long hours are straining middle class workers and their families.”

According to their estimate, hiking the salary threshold to $56,680 would cover 47 percent of the economy’s salaried workers. The senators also asked that the White House tie the salary threshold to an inflation index so it would rise along with the cost of living.

“These are middle class workers who have been working longer hours but without additional compensation,” they wrote. “You have an opportunity to help these workers get a fair day’s pay for a hard day’s work by restoring the income threshold to at least its 1975 value ($56,680 a year) and indexing it to inflation.”

As HuffPost recently reported, there are concerns among progressives that the White House will seek a low threshold to appease the business community, which would have to pay overtime to fewer workers. Republicans in general have criticized the administration’s plan, but the president has the power to enact the reform on his own through executive action.

Just last week, a group of House Democrats recommended an even higher threshold of $69,000.

Bobs Become Lobs as Hair Trends Longer: Top Knot Options for the Gym or Night out

Have you noticed? Hair is trending longer. Bobs are morphing into lobs, even pixies are getting longer … these are still pixies, fun, easy and youthful but with more length.

The other thing I’ve seen trending is top knots. Some of these are really simple and to the point but the ballerina bun that was riding high for a few years is taking on some creative new cousins with upside-down braids and cool, artful twists, which gives us something to do with that longer hair when we’re looking for a quick change of scenery in the mirror! These updos are quick and easy techniques for a quick trip to the gym, grocery store or a romantic night on the town.

Here’s how to do the upside-down braid: Start a french braid or twist at the nape of the neck, near the hairline. Braid up toward the top of the head. Just over the crown, take remainder of hair and twist it into a fun knot on top. You can do this from the forehead back, braid or twist toward the crown then take remainder and do a fun bun.

British Singer Rita Ora wore a really cool, artsy knot at the American Music Awards in November to go with her strapless yellow gown. She was something of a standout on the red carpets there at the Nokia Theater in Los Angeles where the dominant looks were … long and wavy!

Back to trending long hair. We saw a lot of it at the AMAs. Superstar singers Lorde, Jennifer Lopez and Jordan Sparks all had variations of long hair. Lorde wore hers in signature, piecey, pulled-out curls and waves. Sparks boasted terrific volume with lots of tight curls. Jennifer Lopez wore a slick-back wet look with soft ends. Beautiful stuff, all of it.

Same at the Golden Globe Awards earlier this month, we saw lots of long, wavy hair. Stunning were Amal Clooney with her dark, black wavy hair to match her black gown and long, white gloves with her husband, George Clooney, in a classic tuxedo.

Katie Holmes went long but in a neat, slick ponytail, one of those eternal styles. Jennifer Aniston wore hers pulled back in a neat knot, keeping with another strong trend toward simpler, but elegant cuts and styles.

More trend notes soon … As always, be open to change!

How To Explain The Super Bowl To Your Non-American Friends

On Sunday, sports fans in the U.S. will be glued to TV screens for the Super Bowl, the annual championship of the American football league NFL.

The game, this year between the Seattle Seahawks and New England Patriots, is treated like an unofficial holiday in the United States. Companies estimate that billions of chicken wings and millions of pizzas are consumed as families and friends get together to watch the game.

Perplexed? Watch this HuffPost video to understand what all of the fuss is about.

Want To Un-Boil An Egg? Science Has Figured Out How

Chick and EggYou can’t un-speak words and you can’t un-ring a bell, but apparently you
can unboil an egg — well, sort of. Chemists from the University of
California at Irvine and the University of Western Australia have found a way to return egg white proteins back
to their original form that only takes a few minutes. Okay, this isn’t
something they were doing for fun just to prove that it can be done,
though that would totally rock. This new technique has the potential for
a wide range of applications from food production to cancer research.

11 Ways The Future Could Turn Out Differently Than You Expect

11 Ways The Future Could Turn Out Differently Than You Expect

Many of us, owing to an intuitive sense of where technological and social progress are taking us, have a preconceived notion of what the future will look like. But as history has continually shown, the future doesn’t always go according to plan. Here are 11 ways the world of tomorrow may not unfold the way we expect.

Read more…