Animal abuse at factory farms may go undocumented — and unpunished — in yet another state.
Little Girl Has Unexpected, But Completely Logical Reason For Disliking Cats
Posted in: Today's ChiliThere are cat people. There are dog people. But not all of us can eloquently explain why we’re on the side we’re on. Three-year-old Alma has no problem, however.
While on vacation with mom Emma Seabrook in Sri Lanka recently, Alma noticed lots of felines in the streets, Rumble Viral’s Claudio Ramolo told The Huffington Post. That led to the exchange, above, in which Alma is asked why she doesn’t like cats. Her answer will slay you no matter which side you’re on.
H/T BuzzFeed
In Irreverent: A Celebration of Censorship, opening next month at the Leslie Lohman Museum of Gay and Lesbian Art in New York, all of the art has previously been censored from major museums. The 17 artists represent the “controversial” perception of LGBTQ work over three decades, from Robert Mapplethorpe’s photographs in the 1980s to the expulsion of David Wonjarowicz’s “A Fire in My Belly” from the National Portrait Gallery in 2010.
by Caitlin Morton, Condé Nast Traveler
Looking for the beauty of Yosemite and Yellowstone without the crowds? These under-the-radar American parks deserve a spot on your bucket list.
1. North Cascades National Park, Washington
If you want to see glaciers and temperate rainforests in one place, look no further than Washington’s North Cascades National Park. Known for its variety of ecosystems and wildlife, the park is one of the least-visited in the entire country, no doubt due to its rugged terrain and difficult hiking trails. Those up to the task, however, will get the rare experience of spotting bald eagles and hearing the numerous waterfalls that give the park its name.
2. Dry Tortugas National Park, Florida
Located on the southwestern tip of the Florida Keys, Dry Tortugas National Park is actually closer to Cuba than the mainland and is only accessible by boat or plane. And once you make it to the site, you’re pretty much on your own–the park doesn’t provide any facilities for camping or recreational activities. But if you’re willing to prepare, you can more than enjoy the views and history of the island and famous Fort Jefferson, whose military moat resembles an infinity pool at a luxury hotel.
3. Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve, Alaska
Although it’s the largest park in the National Park Service at 13 million+ acres, Wrangell-St. Elias only averages around 65,000 visitors per year (compare that to Yosemite’s nearly 4 million visitors). With only two gravel roads, it’s a perfectly remote spot for adventurers interested in backpacking, hiking, and river rafting.
4. National Park of American Samoa
© Robert Harding World Imagery / Alamy
To say that visiting the National Park of American Samoa requires some effort would be an understatement–you must pass through immigration and customs to enter, camping is prohibited, and there are no restaurants located on the outer islands. However, the tropical landscapes and rich Samoan culture are worth the hassle. For a truly immersive experience, consider signing up for the park’s homestay program to room with locals and learn their unique customs.
5. Great Sand Dunes National Park, Colorado
Beautifully set against the Rocky Mountains, the Great Sand Dunes of Colorado (the largest such dunes in North America) are like something from another planet. It takes hours to climb to the top of the dunes from the parking lot, but the feeling of standing alone thousands of feet in the air is well worth the trek. After taking in the vistas, descend by foot or by sled/sandboard and cool off in the Medano Creek at the bottom of the peaks.
6. Lassen Volcanic National Park, California
© Thomas Hallstein / Alamy
While millions of tourists flock to Yosemite and Death Valley, enjoy a more secluded experience at Lassen Volcanic National Park, one of California’s least-visited parks. As the name suggests, the site is home to active volcanoes and hot springs–you can visit them year-round, 24 hours a day. The park also features over 150 miles of hiking trails and eight campgrounds, making it an ideal location for families and experienced explorers alike.
7. Congaree National Park, South Carolina
South Carolina’s Congaree National Park is an ideal destination for nature- and adventure-lovers alike. Home to one of the tallest deciduous forest canopies on earth, the park offers first-rate bird watching and wilderness tours, plus kayaking, canoeing, and camping. The masses of Spanish moss make for gorgeous photo ops as well.
8. Virgin Islands National Park, St. John
While most of America’s national parks are more about adventure than relaxation, the Virgin Islands National Park offers equal amounts of both. Whether you want to hike or lounge on the beach, windsurf or leisurely snorkel, the island’s accommodations have you covered. And if you’re not in the mood for camping, the park even offers a luxury resort with fine dining options, tennis, and spa packages.
9. Great Basin National Park, Nevada
Great Basin is Nevada’s only national park, providing visitors with some of the state’s most beautiful sites–both above and below the surface. It’s an offbeat, adventurous destination for skiing and snowshoeing during the winter, but the warmer months are slightly more popular. Aside from the dozens of outdoor activities (including fishing, camping, and backpacking), the guided tours of the Lehman Caves are perhaps the park’s main draw.
10. Isle Royale National Park, Michigan
© Jim Brandenburg/Minden Pictures/Corbis
Yellowstone receives more visitors per day than Isle Royale gets in an entire year, but don’t overlook the beauty and activities of this Michigan national park. Although it’s consistently chilly and foggy, Isle Royale offers some of the most pristine views you’ll get of Lake Superior. If you’re willing to brave the cold, you can even take a scuba diving trip to the lake’s many shipwreck sites.
More from Condé Nast Traveler:
The Best Cities in the World
Top 25 Cities in the World: Readers’ Choice Awards 2014
15 Places You Won’t Believe Actually Exist
The Friendliest and Unfriendliest Cities in the U.S.
The 10 Best Small Cities in the U.S.
How Not to Look Like a Tourist in Paris
We know for a fact there’s more than one way to wear a button-down, but now that the half-tuck is tried-and-true, we’ve been on the lookout for some new shirt styling inspiration. That’s when we happened upon a trick we’d never thought of before: the wrap-and-tuck.
As the euphoria of victory subsides and reality sets in, Greece’s new far-left Syriza government confronts the daunting task of trying to strike a balance between the demands of its political base to end austerity and creditors wanting payment. It inherits the same limited options of its predecessor while approaching deadlines add further pressure to talks. As negotiators embark into unchartered territory, ambiguity increasingly dominates the European landscape as a deal could still prove illusive.
During the campaign, Syriza promised to deliver vast social services and simultaneously renegotiate Greece’s debt by demanding it be halved and austerity measures ended. Creditors’ initial reaction has been firmly negative, particularly in northern Europe. Searching for a middle ground could prove a futile task unless Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras begins to demonstrate fiscal responsibility and the earnest implementation of overdue structural reforms, particularly in the public sector. If progress is made, Greece’s creditors would show increased flexibility.
As Tsipras and creditors begin negotiations, a key priority must be avoiding brinksmanship and an immediate collision course. At home, Tsipras will continue to use firm rhetoric to show public confidence. In Europe, he should continue to use the language of moderation and compromise. It is unlikely that any firm agreement will be achieved in the near future. The reality is that each side will muddle through and search for the lowest common denominators as foundations and confidence-building measures for further talks. A gradualist approach could be taken in the form of stealth restructuring. In essence, it amounts to debt restructuring through a series of extensions and interest reductions in order to buy time for longer term negotiations. However, this can only be achieved within a realistic framework whereby the Greek government is still held accountable for debt with reductions but responsible future policies and practices are firmly put in place. Failure to do so will only plant the seeds for further economic ruin and establish a negative precedent for other debtor states in Europe.
Although Tsipras will approach negotiations instilled with a sense of public mandate from Greek voters to end austerity, he must not forget that leaders of European creditor states are also democratically elected. Consequently, they owe a duty of care to their own citizens for fiscal responsibility. Their voters deserve a say in how and where their taxpayer money is spent. After all, they would be responsible for bearing a large portion of any debt cancellation or reduction. In particular, German taxpayers are extra sensitive to this issue after being obliged to pay a unification tax for absorbing East Germany over 20 years ago. Levying a hefty European Union tax, whether directly or indirectly, to bail out debtors would not be easily accepted. German officials were already irritated by the European Central Bank’s recent quantitative easing of 60 billion euros.
Despite Syriza’s convincing victory, market reaction was relatively calm. For now, Europe has avoided the panic days of mid-2012 when two consecutive Greek elections held all on knife’s edge. Ideally, some form of accommodation will be eventually reached. However, should deadlock result and failure materialize, no scenarios can be excluded. Though undesirable, a Greek exit from the eurozone is no longer taboo nor unthinkable. While Europe is now somewhat better prepared than 2012 for Grexit, no firewalls are completely impenetrable and some form of market turmoil will inevitably occur.
INSIDE GREECE
Overall, Greece’s electoral outcome was generally expected and essentially a vote against the traditional establishment, austerity and the dismal status quo in Greek society mired in economic stagnation. It serves as a wake-up call and lesson for mainstream centrist parties throughout Europe and the democratic world to avoid complacency, reform from within and deliver results. Failure to do so will only fuel populist movements and make their coming to power a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Although Greece’s recent electoral process lasted roughly three weeks, Tsipras was in campaign mode for the past three years as opposition leader. Now the hard work of governing begins. The reality of power replaces the rhetoric of campaigning. He technically led the party which won the most votes, roughly one-third, but in reality it is a coalition of parties as its Greek name implies, Syriza meaning coalition. This united left front is an amalgamation of groups ranging from the center-left to far-left, including Communists and Marxists. Its right-wing, anti-austerity junior partner in government, Independent Greeks, includes hard-core nationalists and advocates an anti-immigration message with considerable racist overtones.
Behind Tsipras’ youthful image of a new generation lies a calculated political operator willing to discard allies and befriend opponents to fulfill his agenda. Contrary to his narrative, Tsipras does not represent a complete break with the past. He speaks about rupturing Greece’s vicious cycle and then actually fuels it by constantly offering vague promises of old state-centric solutions to society’s ills. Such populist rhetoric naturally wins votes and effectively appeals to many left hopeless by the economic crisis. It also reflects a past era Tsipras regularly condemns which was dominated by assertive and persuasive personalities who used the public till as patronage for personal advancement, and particularly for electoral gain. Instead of weaning the public off the opium of state dependency, his politics actually feed it.
Whereas former Prime Minister Antonis Samaras engaged in fear-mongering during the election campaign, Tsipras exploited popular emotion. He has regularly preached the politics of victimization in recent years by blaming everyone else for Greece’s hardships – the troika, Europe, international banks, the establishment and an entire array of protagonists. As prime minister, he should engage in greater introspection. The bottom line is that endemic corruption has been widespread and existed at all levels of society. Ultimately, change and reform can only take place through collective national transformation. In theory, Alexis Tsipras should now lead the process as prime minister. In practice, failure to do so will only further contribute to the vicious cycle plaguing Greece.
Greece lies at an historical crossroads. Hard decisions must be made that will determine whether it pursues a future in Europe or increasingly on its own. The threat of being left behind remains real. Firmly backed by public opinion, Tsipras vows to keep Greece in the eurozone. Although the EU can assume its portion of blame for the status quo in Greece, the roots of Greece’s misfortunes primarily lie within, that is, in decades of economic mismanagement and rampant graft. Ultimately, the will to resolve and remedy these ills and the implementation of real reform can only emanate from within Greek society.
Five Years Too Late, The <i>New York Times</i> Admits A Mistake and Boldly Supports a 'Workaround'
Posted in: Today's ChiliThe New York Times published an editorial Monday under the inspiring title, “A Promising Garbage Workaround.”
After many years of unqualified support for it, the paper now admits there is one serious problem with a lethal garbage site under construction in a residential neighborhood in Manhattan: the ramp leading to it bisects a sports field where 34,000 New York City kids from every borough go to play year round.
Though this Vision Zero nightmare has been obvious for years to anyone with actual vision, it is only one of ten or more equally obvious problems. (For example, putting aside the ramp, is it really okay for over 1,000 daily tons of garbage to be dumped 50 feet from where children play?) Moving the ramp a block north — the “workaround” — partially solves one problem, and an important one, but only by moving the pain elsewhere. This is symptomatic of the whole Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP) of which this dump is a part.
The New York Times editorial describes the SWMP as a “veritable trash Enlightenment.” Actually, it’s more toward the end of the Middle Ages, at best. It spends heavily on expensive infrastructure that locks in antiquated methods of handling garbage for a very long time, and is riddled with concessions to forces that have nothing to do with the environment and much to do with greed.
It’s time for reporters to stop dutifully repeating how wonderful the SWMP is and actually look at it from a modern environmental perspective.
Crafted under Bloomberg and billed as Environmental Justice, it is actually Environmental Just-Shift-This, barging and hauling the city’s garbage to distant impoverished communities of color to be burned or buried at the cost of their health. This “externalizing” was antithetical to environmental thinking ten years ago when the plan was conceived, it’s even more so now. It’s “greenwashing”, environmentally dubious bragging, like New York City proudly proclaiming its air is cleaner because of natural gas, which it is, but only as a result of fracking that damages Pennsylvania’s water.
When it comes to strategies for handling garbage, a lot has changed just in the last five years. You only have to look at the way progressive cities like San Francisco handle trash to see what the future holds. Who knows what solutions new technology will offer five years from now? An aggressive national campaign to bring about source reduction would change everything completely. The Bloomberg administration, however, negotiated a 20-year contract with Covanta, a garbage-hauling/burning company that has been accused of both labor and environmental violations. (Reporters at the New York Times might be interested to know that the Chairman of the Board of this company is Sam Zell, notorious for his “let’s take out the garbage” attitude when he bought the LA Times. Here is an article that will send shivers down your journalistic spines.)
The 91st Street Marine Transfer Station (MTS) is a place where 100 to 500 trucks a day will come to dump their loads into barges. It will be huge, a vast 24-hour, 6-day-a-week garbage churning factory with a footprint only slightly smaller than that of the Empire States Building. It will be in Yorkville, perhaps the most densely residential neighborhood in the city, five blocks south of East Harlem in an area already more severely polluted (and asthmatic) than many, if not most, of those it’s supposed to relieve.
Its proximity to public housing is shockingly worse than anywhere else. There are six similar garbage sites in the five boroughs. Only one of them has any public housing within a quarter mile, 33 units at the West 59th Street MTS. The 91st Street MTS has 1000 units of public housing (over 2,000 people) that close. You could throw a stone from the backyard of one building and hit the dump. I am not kidding. Google-map or Circle-line your way around Manhattan’s shoreline and see if you can find a worse place for a dump than East 91st and the river. There isn’t one.
Under the new “workaround” ramp plan suddenly supported by the Times, trucks would drive alongside the 1,000 units of public housing to reach the dump. After years of scathing damnation of any objection to this lethal site, the Times at last acknowledges the child safety issue. But it unwittingly does far more than that. Once you admit this problem, the whole thing soon looks insane. If the only way to reach a garbage dump is by either driving through 34,000 children or alongside 2000 people living in public housing, a reasonable human being must conclude that it’s clearly in the wrong place.
In truth, not since the 19th Century has New York city government placed such a huge industrial facility in the heart of such a large and vulnerable residential population. It’s freakish. It’s the kind of thing a cold-blooded industrialist might do, not an allegedly progressive city government.
The Times editorial proclaims that, “Fairness in this case trumps not-in-my-backyardism.” If it weren’t so silly and tragic, this would be funny. The environmental justice movement which was involved in designing the SWMP plan was almost entirely motivated by not-in-my-backyardism. And rightly so. The desire to limit or stop private garbage trucks driving to private transfer sites too close to the backyards of low income people of color is commendable. But to claim that building a new garbage facility in another backyard even closer to even more low income minority residents just so garbage can be dragged even further than before to blight yet more even poorer people is not “fairness,” it is either political expedience, corruption, or lunacy.
If you, the writer of the editorial, really believe what you write, I invite you to come with me to Stanley Isaacs Houses and John Holmes Tower (the housing developments that will be blighted) and tell the residents to their faces that they are guilty of NIMBY-ism. I’ll hold your coat and help you find your missing teeth afterwards. In this context, an accusation of NIMBY-ism is tantamount to racism, and anyone who has looked at the incredibly close dump construction site from the windows of public housing knows it. Trust me, this is not Park Avenue.
Most galling of all about this debacle? This suffering is for no purpose! Manhattan residential garbage does not go to any outer borough, and the economics of the dump are such that private commercial garbage trucks won’t use it! It will change nothing for the better and make many already vulnerable lives far worse.
Everything about the project stinks. Supposed to cost under $45 million to construct, it will now, according to the Independent Budget Office, come in almost $150 million overbudget. It will triple the cost of getting garbage out of the city for the length of the Bloomberg-negotiated 20-year contract. Everyone, including people in the outer boroughs (even New York Times employees), will have to pay for this. I could go on (it’s in the worst kind of flood zone, it’s at the wrong end of the city, it will add to congestion, it’s already outdated, it is incredibly ugly, it’s up against a public park of which there are few in Yorkville and East Harlem, it’s next to a historic building, etc), but if you have the slightest interest, read the report, “Talking Trash,” which explains it all.
Well, not quite all.
How was this ever allowed to happen in the first place? Why in Yorkville just south of East Harlem? Why opposite public housing? Why does de Blasio support it? Who financed his electoral campaign? Who profits from the dump’s location? How can it have got so far? Why has the New York Times been so timidly supportive of such an obvious social wrong?
Go up to 91st Street and York Avenue and take a look. Then tell me this is not crazy. Or worse. In its own way (and maybe in a not very different way), it is as crazy as the Sheldon Silver matter, another in-plain-sight scandal the press “missed” for years.
We should be grateful that, after years of snobbish resistance, the Times finally changed its mind about one aspect of the 91st Street MTS. But the admission is shamefully late and falls far short of what’s needed. Eventually this lethal, expensive, environmentally embarrassing boondoggle will get cancelled, converted, or knocked down. The longer it takes, the more it will cost. The New York Times should be a little more inquisitive and the Mayor and the City Council should be a lot braver.
The Beatles were certainly known for adding layers of experimental and uncommon noises to their recordings. But to find the most in depth Easter eggs hidden within the Beatles music, The Huffington Post sought out super fan Mike Brown, who has maintained arguably the most in depth list of Beatles anomalies since the ’90s. Brown’s website What Goes On, which has had a web presence since around 1997 as Brown recalls, has detailed recording notes on just about every Beatles song. Over the years, about 400 people have helped contribute to the database.
This list of anomalies even precedes Brown, as he inherited everything from a Beatles fan named Michael Weiss, who first publicly distributed it in 1992 on USENET, before the “world wide web” was prevalent. Asking how he has continued to find all these Beatles anomalies over the years, Brown explained:
Most now come from submissions — things I hadn’t noticed or considered to be that odd until highlighted. But for those that I spotted — just listening to the stereo vinyl/CDs in detail. In recent years, the availability of Dolby 5.1 Surround remixes for some tracks has opened up the ability for people to really hear stuff in detail that I was listing years before.
Jan. 30 is the anniversary of the Beatles last public performance — a 45-minute gig on the roof of their Apple Records headquarters in London in 1969 — here are some fairly deep-cut and often funny Beatles Easter eggs. A few of their classic songs may have been way dirtier than you remembered …
1. The Beatles purposely pronounce “Sie Liebt Dich,” the German version of “She Loves You,” incorrectly. This essentially makes the song “She Loves Dick.”
The Beatles recorded German versions of both “She Loves You” and “I Want To Hold Your Hand” in 1964. For “Sie Liebt Dich” the band completely mispronounced “dich” as “dick,” a mistake that seems suspicious since The Beatles spent years in Hamburg.
On Mike Brown’s “She Love You” entry, he explains, “I’m sure Paul and John knew that “Dich” is not pronounced as “Dick” but the boys are clearly singing ‘Sie Leibt Dick. Ja! Ja! Ja!'” Brown further told HuffPost:
Brown: Is that an intentional little joke? I think they probably knew, and just tried to slide it past the establishment. They spent long enough in Germany to have picked up the correct pronunciation.
The American version might have a dirty element to it as well. Brown writes that The Beatles actually might be singing something other than the official lyrics:
“Sounds like ‘She loves you, She’d love to, She loves you,’ as opposed to the official lyrics! If these are the lyrics being sung, it’s just their naughty little joke. ‘She’d love to, and you know that can’t be bad, wink, wink …'”
2. When Paul McCartney sings about laughing over dinner in “Lovely Rita,” a subtle pop is made to signify a cork.
The popping is pretty subtle, but Mike Brown believes it to be on purpose, writing in his “Lovely Rita” entry, “The pop after ‘over dinner’ — this is very much intentional, and represents the cork popping over dinner.”
The book Sgt. Pepper and the Beatles: It Was Forty Years Ago Today also references the cork popping:
“In addition to these straight vocals, some comical devices were added … There is imitation of a champagne cork popping (on the phrase ‘over dinner’ at 1’27”) using cheek finger popping.”
3. “For You Blue” begins with John Lennon very softly saying, “Queen says ‘No’ to pot smoking FBI members.”
The line is very quiet compared to the rest of the song, but by cranking the volume a bit, John Lennon’s voice come through clearly. As Mike Brown explains in his “For You Blue” entry, the song is “introduced with John saying “Queen says ‘No’ to pot smoking FBI members.” It is curious, in that this was edited in here deliberately.” Brown explained further to HuffPost:
Brown: I think that was just Phil Spector adding character to things. I don’t know why that line is of such significance. ‘Let It Be’ was supposed to be a “live” back-to-basics album. It ended up more heavily “produced” than the original concept, so adding bits of banter like that may have been part of de-studioing it.
4. George Harrison and Paul McCartney harmonizing “tit tit tit tit” in the background of “Girl” was a dirty joke.
You’d think it’d be obvious that a “tit tit tit tit” harmonizing on a song called “Girl” was a dirty joke, but this usually goes unnoticed. The Beatles Bible points out that Paul McCartney is quoted in the book, Paul McCartney: Many Years From Now, talking about the origin of the joke:
It was always amusing to see if we could get a naughty word on the record: ‘fish and finger pie’, ‘prick teaser’, ‘tit tit tit tit.’ The Beach Boys had a song out where they’d done ‘la la la la’ and we loved the innocence of that and wanted to copy it, but not use the same phrase. So we were looking around for another phrase, so it was ‘dit dit dit dit,’ which we decided to change in our waggishness to ‘tit tit tit tit,’ which is virtually indistinguishable from ‘dit dit dit dit.’ And it gave us a laugh.
It was to get some light relief in the middle of this real big career that we were forging. If we could put in something that was a little bit subversive then we would. George Martin might say, ‘Was that “dit dit” or “tit tit” you were singing?’ ‘Oh, “dit dit,” George, but it does sound a bit like that, doesn’t it?’ Then we’d get in the car and break down laughing.
That “fish and finger pie,” McCartney mentions is from “Penny Lane.” Mike Brown talked to HuffPost about the “four of fish and finger pie” line and explained McCartney has been pretty open about the dirtiness of that line saying, “Paul acknowledged [the line] as ‘a bit of smut, for the lads’ if I recall correctly!”
5. Near the end of “I’m Only Sleeping,” someone almost inaudibly commands “Yawn, Paul.” Then McCartney yawns.
Beatles Music History! believes this muddied command is made by John Lennon and explains further:
“Paul’s ‘yawn’ was added just before the last bridge, preceded by John’s instruction ‘yawn, Paul’ which can quietly be heard in the finished recording.”
Mike Brown’s entry for “I’m Only Sleeping” also points out the moment, stating that a “voice says “Yawn, Paul,” and at 2:01, he does!”
BONUS: There is supposedly an accidental “undeleted expletive” in “Hey Jude” that doesn’t get censored out.
Mike Brown told HuffPost that he first noticed this expletive “after seeing the cryptic reference to it in Mark Lewisohn’s Recording Sessions book.” Brown further said:
Brown: I think one of the funniest has to be the “undeleted expletive” in “Hey Jude.” Mainly because it’s probably the most played record in the history of the planet (I may have made that up), but radio stations seem to be oblivious to John swearing away in the background as he fumbled the acoustic guitar part … Some people think it’s Paul, fumbling on the piano. But I’m not convinced on that. I’d love to hear a clearer version of that backing.
It’s a bit hard to hear (which explains why radio stations play the song uncensored), but it does sound like someone says “wrong chord” and then shortly after shouts “fucking hell” in the background.
All images Getty unless otherwise noted.
LOCK HAVEN, Pa. (AP) — Authorities say they have filed murder charges against the colleague-turned-lover of a Pennsylvania woman 23 years after she disappeared.
Police arrested 65-year-old Loyd Groves on Thursday in connection with Kathy Heckel’s June 1991 disappearance in Lock Haven. Her body has never been found. The Beaver County man is being held without bail and couldn’t be reached for comment.
Prosecutors say Groves killed Heckel after she told him she wanted to end their relationship. They say co-workers recalled them fighting at work hours before she disappeared.
The state attorney general’s office took over the case in November 2013, enlisted help from the state police and FBI and brought evidence to an investigative grand jury.
Attorney General Kathleen Kane says she hopes Groves’ arrest brings relief to Heckel’s loved ones.
Divorce: My Year Sleeping In My Coat And Crying In Strangers' Armpits – Telegraph
Posted in: Today's ChiliLast night I hosted a dinner party at my house, after work, for eight mums from my son’s school. Not a major achievement as it goes – jar of curry paste, a few peppers, bit of chicken and bob’s your uncle.
Except that a year ago last night, aged 35, I was on the verge of a nervous breakdown; going through the perfect storm of divorce, an end to a year’s maternity leave and the start of a big new job, all in the same week.