Data gathered through wearable sensors is nothing without context, which is why Zepp is updating their apps today to better serve athletes who utilize their multi-sport sensor. With the move to version 2.2 for Zepp Golf, Zepp Baseball, and Zepp Tennis, users will get access to Insights, a new feature from Zepp that gives personalized feedback based on information Zepp’s … Continue reading
I recall standing in my grandmother’s kitchen with her yellow Bakelite phone to my ear, waiting on hold for a talkback radio program. I was eight years old, and my family was in another room listening to the Catholic Bishop of Toledo take questions from callers on the local AM station.
Finally it was my turn. “Bishop Donovan,” I said, “I’m in third grade. The priest at our school has come to our class to ask for boys to volunteer to be altar servers. Why can’t girls volunteer too?”
To be entirely clear up front, this model does NOT reflect what we’re about to see in the Avengers: Age of Ultron film. Instead, this is a set made based on the first Avengers film, already released in theaters and long since placed on Blu-ray, DVD, etc. This particular set also reminds us that there’s more than one scale at … Continue reading
Should Kobe Bryant Just Hang it up?
Posted in: Today's ChiliOn Wednesday, the Los Angeles Lakers announced that Kobe Bryant had successful surgery on his right rotator cuff in which he injured on Jan. 21 against the New Orleans Pelicans.
After undergoing successful surgery, Kobe will miss the rest of the season and be out for nine months. So expect to see the Black Mamba ready to go at full strength in the 2015-16 season. Injuries are seemingly starting to become a common factor for Bryant as he missed 76 games last season due to a knee injury he suffered after coming back from an Achilles injury that he suffered in the 2012-13 season. With all these injuries popping up on the 36-year-old guard from Lower Merion High School, is it time for him to hang it up?
Now when you pose this question to basketball fans, you get a very heated debate on both sides with one side saying the game has simply passed Kobe and the other side saying that Kobe cannot go out this way, he is one of the greatest players of all time. I am on the latter of the two sides; Bryant cannot and will not go out this way. He will go out on his terms which is the right thing to do.
The player, who has not one but five championships, is still the main attraction in Los Angeles, not Chris Paul and Blake Griffin. Sorry, Clippers, you might be winning more games than the Lake Show but Kobe is still putting butts in the seats.
Even at 36, Bryant is still playing at a high level despite the Lakers having a record of 12-34. This season, Kobe was averaging 22.3 points, 5.7 rebounds, and 5.6 assists in 34.5 minutes per game. That’s ridiculous for a player at Kobe’s age to put up that amount points. In comparison to Michael Jordan, at the age of 36, he had already retired. But when he came back at the age of 38 in the 2001-02 season with the Washington Wizards, he only averaged 22.9 points per game.
Finally, in his last season with the Wizards in the 2002-03 season, he only scored 20 points per game. If Jordan can do that at almost 40 years old, why can’t Kobe give it a go one more time next season. Yes I know Bryant is owed $25 million next season, in which some people say he should not even make that much. But Gilbert Arenas, who isn’t in the league anymore was making $23 million in 2013.
My point is that for people to say that the Mamba needs to hang it up; it’s a bunch of malarkey. The guy can still score, put butts in the seats at the Staples Center and has 32,482 career points. Maybe if the front office can put some pieces around him going into the final year of his contract, just maybe we will see Bryant go out on his own terms.
This story was published by The Center for Public Integrity, a nonprofit, nonpartisan investigative news organization in Washington, D.C.
A bipartisan group of lawmakers will soon float a bill requiring U.S. Senate candidates to electronically file campaign finance documents, the Center for Public Integrity has learned.
Known as the Senate Campaign Disclosure Parity Act, the bill — which the Congressional Budget Office estimates could save taxpayers about $500,000 a year — aims to sync the Senate with what’s currently required for U.S. House candidates, presidential candidates and political action committees.
But like previous iterations of the bill, the Senate Campaign Disclosure Parity Act is likely to die an unceremonious death, buried in the docket of a Senate subcommittee. That’s because Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has previously stymied the legislation, and now as Senate majority leader, his power to shape legislative priorities is stronger than ever.
Nevertheless, supporters of the bill hope to win over converts.
“For too long, senators have hidden behind an outdated filing system that wastes taxpayers’ money and isn’t transparent,” Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., who will be the bill’s chief sponsor, said in a statement.
“Transparency in politics and saving taxpayers’ money is not a partisan issue,” Tester added. “This is a commonsense step that will improve our broken campaign finance system.”
Already, Tester has earned a few new allies.
At least three of the 12 newly elected Republican senators tell the Center for Public Integrity they’re sympathetic, as is Sen. Gary Peters, D-Mich., the sole new Democratic freshman senator.
“It’s time to bring Senate campaign reporting into the 21st century,” Sen. Cory Gardner, R-Colo., said in a statement.
Gardner added that it was “long past time for the Senate to be held to the same standard” as the U.S. House of Representatives, where Gardner previously served for four years and where candidates must, by law, e-file their campaign finance reports.
Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., will also be supporting the new e-filing legislation.
“This bill is a commonsense measure to increase transparency and ensure that taxpayer dollars are used more effectively,” said Daines spokeswoman Alee Lockman.
Additionally, Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., “would be supportive of e-filing requirements at the federal level if the implementation grants candidates and committees ample time to prepare for the new law,” said his spokesman Daniel Keylin.
Officials with the other freshmen Republican senators either declined to comment or did not respond to requests.
A spokesman for McConnell also did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Lisa Rosenberg, a lobbyist for the Sunlight Foundation, which supports e-filing, called the bill a “no-brainer” that should be “a non-issue.”
Last year, the legislation was supported by more than half of the Senate, though it never received a vote on the Senate floor. This year, however, Rosenberg says, it could be even more challenging to pass the Senate Campaign Disclosure Parity Act.
“Considering we couldn’t get this bill passed when the Democrats had the majority, I’m not optimistic that we’ll get the bill passed now that Mitch McConnell is running the show,” she said.
While it is not required by law, some senators — mostly Democrats but also a few Republicans and the Senate’s two independents — choose to e-file copies of their campaign finance reports with the Federal Election Commission.
Dina LaPolt, Esq. is an attorney at LaPolt Law, P.C., a boutique transactional entertainment law firm in West Hollywood, California that specializes in representing creators, including recording artists, songwriters, producers, musicians, authors, writers, photographers, actors, and others. She is an expert at strategizing and solving complex and sophisticated legal and business issues relating to contracts, copyrights, trademarks, rights of publicity, and litigation.
In addition to practicing law, Dina serves as an activist for creators and celebrities in the areas of privacy, copyright, and fairness in radio, often becoming involved in legislative matters that affect the rights of her clients and advocating on their behalf. Dina has taught a course entitled “Legal and Practical Aspects of the Music Business” at the UCLA Extension Program since 2001 and served as the editor of Building Your Artist’s Brand as a Business, published by the International Association of Entertainment Lawyers in 2012.
How has your life experience made you the leader you are today?
My experience has given me the ability to handle life on life’s terms. In every nerve-racking situation, there is a beginning, a middle, and an end. When I was a musician, I was very focused on being able to support myself with my music. I never chose another path even when others tried to convince me to have a backup plan I could “fall back on”. I never paid attention to anyone’s doubts and I threw all my eggs in one basket, pursuing my career as a musician and even majoring in music in college.
Thank God I did that! Had I not focused solely on music, I would never been exposed to the music business and that is where I had my epiphany! When I started out as a musician, it never dawned on me that the business side of music was a viable career–as soon as I understood this, I started focusing on the business rather than trying to make it as a musician. I would have never gotten into music law if I hadn’t had the life experience of being a musician and an artist.
As a lawyer, my life experience has built my brand and enhanced my business reputation in enumerable ways, some of which I cannot even describe. Anyone can memorize the law but going through stressful negotiations and litigations are experiences you just cannot learn in books.
Real life experience is what builds character.
How has your previous employment experience aided your position at LaPolt Law?
Before becoming a lawyer, I was a personal manager, club promoter and a musician. LaPolt Law is a boutique talent-based transactional law firm. We specialize in representing music creators such as songwriters, recording artists, and producers. My prior experiences have allowed me to approach my work with a thorough understanding of the creator’s perspective which has been essential to my practice.
What have the highlights and challenges been during your tenure at LaPolt Law?
I represented the Estate of Tupac Shakur for 13 years. During that time we released 9 posthumous albums which sold over 40 million records worldwide, and I co-produced the documentary feature film Tupac Resurrection, which was nominated for an Academy Award. This was a special time–I am very proud of the work I did on the Tupac estate. Another highlight was co-producing and handling all the legal work for the documentary Becoming Chaz which chronicles Chaz Bono’s transition from female to male. Becoming Chaz was nominated for multiple Emmy Awards.
One of the biggest challenges I have faced relates to my representation of Steven Tyler. I helped him get out of a toxic management agreement. The manger ended up suing me in retaliation, as a bullying tactic. But I fought back–the litigation is still ongoing–and through the process I have learned that I can handle anything. I used to be afraid of litigation, but lawsuits are inevitable when you’re a high-power player in the entertainment business, and now I know I can handle it.
A client once told me that when you’re faced with a difficult situation, you have three choices: give up, give in, or give it all you got. I always give it all I’ve got and that’s the reason I’ve been so successful.
What do you think are the main issues in the field of entertainment law at the current time?
There is a major battle going on in Washington, D.C. right now between creators, who are fighting to retain control over uses of their works, and tech and media companies, who want to use other people’s music, art, and other intellectual property however and whenever they want while paying as little as possible.
In addition to practicing entertainment law, I am very involved in the legislative process in Washington, D.C. to make sure that our copyright laws treat music, art and other works with the respect and integrity that true art deserves. Currently, four different sections of the U.S. government are reviewing copyright laws and the other laws affecting the music industry: the Copyright Office, the House of Representatives Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet, the Department of Justice, and the Department of Commerce Internet Policy Task Force.
For me, and for the creators I represent, control over the way works are used will always be paramount to the money. I’ve represented an artist who was a major supporter of women’s rights who would never allow her music to be used in a scene or a commercial that denigrated women. I’ve represented artists who are sober who would turn down all the money in the world before allowing their music to be used in a beer commercial. But if the tech companies have their way, creators will lose their right to say no, which would have a serious chilling effect on the creation of art and music.
In America, unlike other countries such as France and Japan, artists do not have strong moral rights in their works. In those countries, art is seen as an extension of creators’ personalities, which must be respected and treated with dignity. Moral rights give an artist the ultimate say over how his or her art is used, altered, or displayed. So these issues of control and approval are really at the core of what’s going on in the entertainment business here in America.
There are many other important issues on the table, such as the sound recording public performance right for terrestrial (FM/AM) radio. In America, songwriters, but not performers, receive royalties from terrestrial broadcasters’ use of their works. This is a right enjoyed in nearly every other industrialized country in the world–the short list of countries without the right includes North Korea, Iran, China, and Rwanda. This harms our artists by denying them substantial domestic income as well as reciprocal revenues from abroad; because we do not pay this royalty to foreign artists, those countries do not pay this royalty to American artists either. Sources estimate that this costs the U.S. economy more than $100 million each year. Not to mention, this has an especially harmful effect on elder artists, some of whom, although their music is constantly played on the radio, must maintain a grueling touring lifestyle well past the age of retirement just to support themselves and their families.
Another hot topic is the consent decrees governing the United States’ two main performance rights organizations (“PROs”), the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (“ASCAP”) and Broadcast Music, Inc. (“BMI”). The consent decrees mandates that rate courts must set royalty rates for performance rights licenses issued by the PROs. When making this determination, the rate courts are not allowed to consider other royalty rates as evidence, preventing them from obtaining fair market value. This is causing a major uproar in the music industry because the major music publishers are considering withdrawing entirely from the PROs so that they can directly negotiate for higher royalty rates. The DOJ announced in June 2014 that it will extensively review the consent decrees.
What advice can you offer women who are seeking to start their own business?
Anyone opening their own business must have a clear sense of what their brand is going to be. Are you providing a service? Are you selling a product? Once you decide on a business model, you must be consistent and focus for years on building it. I only started earning a profit after 10 years of owning my own law firm because everything went back into the business. You have to think about your long-term goals.
In addition, the business has to be something you love doing, not something you do just for the money. There are long hours and many ups and downs. In other words, if I won the lottery today, I probably would not change much in my daily life because I love what I do. I am not doing it for the money…but it sure is nice when you start making some!
My advice specific to women is that you cannot be afraid to be aggressive and play ball with the men. Men will try to intimidate you, but you have to stand your ground. In a male-dominated industry, it is essential that they know they cannot take advantage of you. Force them to show you respect.
How do you maintain a work/life balance?
I make taking care of myself a priority. If I take care of myself, then I can take care of others…with ease. I work out six days a week and I eat right–my stomach is not a garbage pail. I take 4 spin classes a week at SoulCycle, 2 Pilates classes, and I do yoga regularly. I stay away from refined sugar and fried foods unless it’s a special occasion.
What do you think is the biggest issue for women in the workplace?
The glass ceiling. It’s a fact that the business world, including the music industry, is dominated by men. Powerful men have a hard time reporting to women, so women have a hard time climbing the corporate ladder.
In addition, men spend a lot of time bromancing each other and it’s perfectly socially acceptable, which is not the case with women. Men will play golf or basketball, attend sporting events, go out gambling together, etc….these are common social and business building activities that men regularly do. Men bond and help each other in the business world.
Unfortunately, women in business do not spend enough time doing these kinds of things. The social norms are different for women, and there are different expectations. There is a stigma associated with business women getting together to bond…it’s perceived as a gossip time. In addition, I think women tend to be more competitive among each other. I wish women would spend more time helping each other rather than outdoing each other.
How has mentorship made a difference in your professional and personal life?
My mentors helped me get my start by telling me the behind-the-scenes workings and industry customs for the music business–the things you can’t learn in books. It is essential to have a mentor in such a small business, where one misstep can ruin an entire career.
Which other female leaders do you admire and why?
Christine Lepera and Patricia Glaser. Both are very powerful female litigation attorneys and both work very differently. When I grow up I want to be just like them!
What do you want your firm to accomplish in the next year?
I would like to represent a prominent and successful female recording artist! A Nicki Minaj/Katy Perry/Lady Gaga/Britney-type artist. That would be incredible!
This week, the Seattle Police Department issued an apology to a 70-year-old black veteran who was arrested last summer when a female officer apparently falsely accused him of threatening her with a golf club.
A Cold Night for a Good Cause
Posted in: Today's ChiliLast night, as the temperature dropped to a chilling 25 degrees, I joined hundreds of volunteers canvassing the streets of Washington for D.C.’s annual “Point-in-Time” homeless count. This census of homeless individuals measures how well we are meeting our national goal to end homelessness and helps the Administration determine how to allocate resources for homeless support services. But beyond just number gathering, this effort aims to connect those experiencing homelessness with housing, health care, and other resources they need.
Those of us in D.C. were just a handful of the volunteers from communities across the country–many in areas even colder than the Capitol–who go out each January to conduct a census of our homeless neighbors. Volunteers speak to people living on the street and ask a few short questions. We also provide them a list of resources where they could connect to services, including agencies that could support their health and help them get off the streets.
At the Department of Health and Human Services, we see that the relationship between health and housing stability is intertwined. A health crisis can mean someone loses their ability to work, which causes them to lose their housing and eventually end up on the street. Many struggle with serious mental illnesses, substance use disorders, and disabilities or chronic conditions that go unnoticed and untreated. Without housing, they can’t focus on their health issues, and without addressing their health issues, they can’t get back on their feet.
HHS administers many programs that target specific populations that experience homelessness, including people with mental and/or substance use disorders, veterans, families and youth, and chronically homeless individuals. Although these programs are making a difference, more is needed to help the approximately 578,000 people who experience homelessness on any given night.
Fortunately, the Affordable Care Act provides coverage for the health and support services that individuals need to help stabilize their lives, meet their health needs, and most importantly regain their dignity.
In places where Medicaid coverage has expanded, like here in D.C., more people can access preventive and mental health care, along with other health services. Now, nearly everyone we came across last night should have access to affordable health and mental health care, as well as treatment for substance use disorders.
Connecting the men and women struggling with homelessness to housing and health resources helps some of our most vulnerable citizens, but it also goes further to strengthen our communities. Ending homelessness is smart fiscal policy. Without access to affordable health care, people who are not stably housed often rely on emergency rooms for their basic health care needs. The cost for that care is passed on to hospitals, insurance consumers, and taxpayers. Those without housing also end up in temporary shelters and are at risk for unnecessary jail time–all at the public expense. Stable, permanent housing with supportive services is proven to lower unnecessary public expenses like avoidable hospitalizations.
Over the last few years, we’ve seen our commitment to this cause pay off. The number of veterans experiencing homelessness has dropped by 33 percent, and we’re on track to reduce the number even more this year. And we’ve managed to reduce the number of people experiencing chronic homelessness–folks who have been living on the street or in a shelter for more than a year–by 30 percent since 2007. That reduction is no small feat, and the annual “Point-in-Time” census is helping us make great strides–but there is still more work to be done.
The men and women I met have names and stories. They have faced hardships that many of us will never know. No matter the paths that lead to homelessness, they are a part of our community, and they deserve better than frigid nights and sleeping on concrete, struggling to maintain good health.
Despite the cold, I was honored to take part in a night that will help so many others find a warm bed. As federal and local governments, providers, advocates, and volunteers, we must continue to work together to end homelessness. With our resources and resolve, we can and will lift our neighbors out of these dangerous situations. It’s good for them; it’s good for us; and it’s the right thing to do.
I didn’t want to let Human Trafficking Awareness Month go by without spending some time talking about the issue. Not simply as a “problem” – any reasonable person would agree that human trafficking, particularly commercial sexual exploitation of women and children, is a global scourge – but as a part of the larger solution.
What do I mean by that?
What’s important to me about Human Trafficking Awareness Month is the word “awareness,” without which traffickers will find it much easier to do what they do out in the open and in the shadows. As was pointed out by Nick Kristof in the three-part PBS documentary “A Path Appears: Sex Trafficking in the USA,” it is critical to create a groundswell of attention around this issue. And the fact remains that most Americans simply do not appreciate how much sex trafficking is going on in our own backyards, or the brutality of the industry.
Human trafficking exists when multiple systems in our society fail the victims; therefore the solutions will necessarily be complex, demanding the involvement of government and police agencies, legislatures, NGOs and advocacy groups.
But a key element, I believe, also has to be the committed involvement of concerned individuals. And that’s where volunteers, whether as members of groups or as individuals, come into the picture.
Let’s take as a given that an important piece of the solution to this seemingly intractable problem has to be creating awareness at the community level, where the traffickers actually make their money.
Let’s also posit that individuals and community-based groups know their communities better than anyone – however well intentioned – does who is far away in the state capital, or in Washington, or in Brussels.
And let’s recognize the incredible power of the networked individual to bring about real, lasting change at the community level.
What do I mean?
Picking just one example, let’s take a look at what the Junior Leagues of California State Public Affairs Committee, which advocates for policies that improve the lives of California women, children and families, has done to fight human trafficking. Because of my role at The Association of Junior Leagues International, I know this group very well – but let’s put that aside.
What this networked group of women – every one of them a volunteer – has done in a few short years is remarkable.
Public data tells us that California is one of the top four states for trafficking of human beings and harbors three of the FBI’s highest child sex trafficking areas in the U.S.: Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Diego.
CalSPAC, which has been involved in the fight against human trafficking in California since 2010, has sponsored or supported 13 bills related to human trafficking in the state legislature, of which seven were enacted, resulting in the addition of human trafficking to K-12 educational curricula as well as victim protection and criminal penalty augmentation. An important focus has been sealing minor victims’ arrest records and building a statewide framework to move in the direction of treating commercially sexually exploited children as victims not criminals.
Less obvious but still incredibly important, CalSPAC and its members network with other volunteers and organizations to create that change in California.
Not bad for a group of volunteers.
There are many other examples, both in The Junior League and out, of other wonderful work that volunteers and volunteer-driven organizations are doing in the fight against human trafficking.
And these examples, like CalSPAC’s initiatives, are not headline grabbers. They don’t rely on cameo appearances by a celebrity endorser. And they don’t require massive fundraising.
It’s just people – ordinary people like you and me – showing up and getting involved in the fight against a terrible problem that, in one way or another, impacts the communities where we live and, more importantly, is a blight on the lives of literally millions of people who are being exploited by traffickers.
As Oprah celebrates turning 61 on Thursday, January 29, we’re looking back at one of her all-time favorite birthday moments. It will be tough to ever top her milestone 50th birthday bash back in 2004, when best friend Gayle King and the Harpo team surprised the talk show mogul with a legendary blowout that included guests like Tina Turner, Stevie Wonder and Jay Leno.
Oprah has said many times that she doesn’t like surprises, but all bets were off that day. To honor the birthday girl with a special champagne toast, good friend John Travolta popped in to say a few words. In the above throwback clip, take a look back at the tribute that moved Oprah to tears.
“To the most wonderful person in the world, Oprah Winfrey, our friend,” Travolta begins. “And it’s not just because you went out of your way to make sure that 50,000 underprivileged children in South Africa had their first Christmas gift or that you want to put schools throughout that country, but also because you inject the spirit into our society of life. You care. Your intelligence, your inspiration, and you do it all without judging, and because you treat everyone equally important, and this makes you a great American hero,” John says.
“You represent the best of our country and what’s possible in our country,” he says. “But, more importantly, you are a citizen of the world, and you are a hero to mankind. So we are better for knowing you, Oprah. We are.”
“And to boot, you are beautiful, you are sexy,” Travolta adds, causing the audience to erupt in cheers. “You’re talented, and we love you so much, we can’t take it.”
@media only screen and (min-width : 500px) {.ethanmobile { display: none; }}