With the popularization and commercialization of 3D printing, you can almost make anything these days. With some patience and time, of course. 3D printers have been used to solve a wide range of problems, and non-problems, like replacement limbs for dogs or even chocolate. It was that same problem-solving thinking that lead Rene Meeh to face one his problems head … Continue reading
There are speakers, and then there are portable speakers. Of course, there are some portable speakers out there which are more noteworthy and capable than others in the same field. The $199.99 Kicker KPw Wireless Speaker System is a portable Bluetooth speaker that intends to deliver maximum flexibility for the owner, as it packs in great sound with a pair of drivers as well as a couple of radiators. In addition, there is a microphone available for phone calls as well as wireless Bluetooth connectivity.
The Kicker KPw Wireless Speaker System would be able to understand that some of us out there might not be moving in the direction of the fully wireless lifestyle. This will include a standard 3.5mm Aux input jack just in case you do not happen to have any device out there that has Bluetooth connectivity. As for the aforementioned drivers and passive bass radiators, they measure 1.75” (44mm) and 2″ (52mm), respectively. The integrated rechargeable battery would be able to deliver up to 10 hours of music playback, and whenever it runs out of juice, it will require just 3.5 hours in order to fully recharge.
[ Kicker KPw Wireless Speaker System portable Bluetooth speaker copyright by Coolest Gadgets ]
Related Posts
Violin-playing Robot: RO-BOW
Posted in: Today's ChiliSince retiring in 2002, mechanical engineer and bioengineer Seth Goldstein has spent a lot of his free time making kinetic sculptures. You may have heard of him before as the creator of the Why Knot?, a machine that continuously ties and unties a necktie. His latest creation is RO-BOW, a robot that plays a full-size violin.
RO-BOW relies on a custom computer program that turns MIDI files into instructions for its actuators, which move four disc-shaped fingers over the neck as well as the cradle carrying the violin’s body. While its design allows it to play any note, it might not be fast or subtle enough for some songs. Still, I’m sure RO-BOW would rake it in if it were a busker.
It sounds like a beginner practicing the instrument, but I’m still in awe at this robot. At least until someone replicates it with LEGO.
[via Engadget]
For 30 days, GPS for the Soul and meQuilibrium are providing you tips on how to live a healthier, happier and stress-free life. See the previous stress tips here.
Juggling everything is exhausting — and it weakens your connection to purpose. When you let busyness (and ensuing stress) consume you, you max out your mental resources long before you’ve lived up to your potential. But busyness is a fact of life, so how do you step away from the constant clamor without everything going up in flames? You do that by maintaining quiet, focused time for yourself in which to reflect, recharge and let your mind wander — and guarding that precious time like it’s your job.
It takes courage and discipline to “do nothing,” but it’s vital. Without the freedom to daydream, you fail to stoke the flames of your hopes and dreams — the very things that can keep you going. Your job in life isn’t just to clean up the bad. You need time to pay attention to the good. Schedule a 20-minute block of time today to let your body and mind go off the grid. This is not the time to solve problems directly, but to brainstorm, think out of the box, imagine. You owe yourself that much.
Read more about how doing nothing makes you a better leader.
–Posted by Lindsay Holmes
Learn more useful information about stress and your health! Order meQuilibrium’s new book, meQuilibrium: 14 Days to Cooler, Calmer, and Happier, co-authored by meQuilibrium CEO Jan Bruce, Adam Perlman, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, and Andrew Shatté, Ph.D., Chief Science Officer.
Should News Outlets, Social Media and Internet Services Curb Public Access to ISIS?
Posted in: Today's ChiliAny rational person viewing even a portion of an ISIS snuff video has wondered: Do these maniacs really think that they can win popular support for their cause through grisly online depictions of immolations and mass beheadings? Don’t they realize that the vast, vast majority of viewers are sickened by these images and want absolutely nothing to do with the (so-called) Islamic State?
The answer, I fear, is that ISIS’s leaders know what they’re doing. Although their highly produced videos are repulsive to a mass audience, they are effective in winning over the hearts and twisted minds of a few thousand psychopaths around the world who are so enthralled by the prospect of ritualized murder that they will catch the next train for the killing fields of Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Libya or wherever.
ISIS is not interested in converting entire Muslim populations (other than those they directly control) to their apocalyptic cause. ISIS leaders expect their videos to terrify and terrorize mainstream Muslims (especially Shiites)—as they do Christians, Jews and all other “infidels.”
But ISIS’s main objective, in using social media and the internet to reach the broadest possible audience, is to find “a few good men”: men (and women) who are good, really good, at torture, mayhem and up-close killings that excel in their barbarism and shock value. Good sadists, after all, are hard to find.
It is because of this strategy–broadcasting to millions to recruit a few–that ISIS poses a free speech dilemma. Responsible media have struggled over how to report on ISIS’s atrocities, knowing that the group’s executions are the ultimate in media events, conducted for the purpose of creating videos that are seen around the world.
Should news media show ISIS’s videos, as Fox News recently did (or at least point to them in news accounts)? Twitter, YouTube and Facebook, while unable to prevent the posting of ISIS videos on their services (because the sheer volume of user video precludes pre-screening), have moved quickly to remove the videos, once posted, and to shut down suspected ISIS-affiliated accounts. Still, the horrific videos are readily found on the internet. And all news organizations continue to treat the release of new ISIS videos as major news events (even if they opt not to show the videos).
On the one hand, free speech principles always favor free and open circulation of dissident expression, no matter how heinous. The rationale is a pragmatic one: The best way to defeat a toxic ideology–and what could be more toxic than the genocidal nihilism of ISIS?–is to give it a stage and loudspeaker. Suppress an idea and you risk giving it undeserved legitimacy. But expose it to the competition of uncensored debate and criticism, and it will be revealed as the empty fraud that it is.
On the other hand, the free marketplace of ideas may fail us in the case of ISIS. Free and open debate is, to be sure, a reliable means of turning most of the world–including the clear majority of Muslims–against ISIS. But ISIS is not submitting to the people’s choice through democratic elections. It doesn’t care about majority opinion; in fact, it wants to terrorize the majority, not win it over. Its videos, remember, are calculated, to recruit a few (or few thousand) psychopaths. And psychopaths attracted to the ISIS death cult are, it is fair to say, unreceptive to the rational back-and-forth of public debate on the merits of Islamist extremism.
I do not mean to suggest that the federal government should take steps to unplug ISIS videos on the internet, even if it could do so (which is doubtful). That would blow too big a hole in first amendment protections. However, news organizations, social media and internet services have editorial discretion–protected by the first amendment–to deny ISIS access to their audiences.
To the extent they do so, more power to them.They are acting responsibly, in my opinion.
—–
Peter Scheer, a lawyer and journalist, is executive director of the First Amendment Coalition. The views expressed here are his alone, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the FAC Board of Directors.
AUSTELL, Ga. (AP) — A metro Atlanta man told police a spider thief snuck into a crawlspace under his home and stole five of his 18 pet tarantulas.
Austell police say they’ve issued an arrest warrant for a man accused of possessing the arachnids. Dwayne Melton tells WSB-TV (http://bit.ly/1MOqNI2) the spiders live beneath his Austell home in individual containers, where they hibernate during the winter until spring arrives.
Melton said he didn’t know his spiders were missing until he got a phone call from Animart Pets in Austell, where employees said someone had just sold five tarantulas to the business. Melton then identified the spiders as his and police began investigating.
It wasn’t immediately known when the theft happened, and details about the suspect weren’t available.
___
Information from: WSB-TV, http://www.wsbtv.com/index.html
As more Millennials assume leadership positions around the world, organizations are becoming increasingly concerned with how to ensure their success. However, most existing research on those born between the early ‘80s and late ‘90s is skewed toward understanding what a narrow, typically Western, population wants. Conclusions based on such a limited sample could lead to bad decisions (and missed opportunities) around attracting, retaining, and developing millennial leaders in a global business environment.
To broaden our understanding of what Millennials want at work, INSEAD’s Emerging Markets Institute, Universum, and the HEAD Foundation conducted the first of what will become an annual survey of Millennials — and the largest study of its kind. We surveyed 16,637 people between 18 and 30 years old, in 43 countries across Asia, Africa, Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, and North America. The data was collected from May to August 2014, and the results are presented in “Millennials: Understanding a Misunderstood Generation.”
JUAN A. LOZANO, Associated Press
HOUSTON (AP) — Evidence from more than 6,600 rape kits that went untested for years in Houston have turned up 850 hits in the FBI’s nationwide database of DNA profiles, marking a major step in the city’s $6 million effort to address the backlog, officials announced Monday.
Charges have been filed against 29 people, six of whom have been convicted, since the city launched an effort in 2013 to test 6,663 rape kits — some of which dated back nearly three decades. Testing was completed in the fall, and the results have now been uploaded to a database used by investigators nationwide to compare DNA profiles of possible suspects, Mayor Annise Parker said.
“This milestone is of special importance to rape survivors and their families and friends because it means their cases are receiving the attention they should have years ago,” Parker said at a news conference, where she joined local law enforcement officials to announce the results.
Police are continuing to review the matches to see if charges can be filed in other cases. In the cases where prosecutors have won convictions, defendants have received sentences ranging from 2 to 45 years in prison. One case was dismissed after the victim decided not to pursue the case.
Rape kits include biological samples and physical evidence gathered from sexual assault victims that are later processed to see if they match a suspect’s DNA. Testing results are uploaded to the FBI’s Combined DNA Index System, or CODIS.
Harris County District Attorney Devon Anderson said there were some cases where suspects committed other crimes while rape kits that could have identified them sat untested.
“Now that the testing of these kits is complete, we know that it’s up to us to finish the job and to seek justice for these victims. The ball is in our court and we will do our best to put the people who are responsible for these heinous crimes behind bars for as long as possible,” she said.
Experts say Houston’s backlog — and similar backlogs in other U.S. cities — are due in part to the high cost of testing which can run from $500 to $1,000 per kit, though advocates argue that the lack of testing signals that sex crimes haven’t always been law enforcement priorities.
More than 12,000 kits went untested for years in Memphis, Tennessee, which is facing a lawsuit from rape victims as it tries to test the kits. In Detroit, prosecutors discovered more than 11,000 rape kits in an abandoned police warehouse in 2009, and Cleveland prosecutors have sent their entire 4,700-kit backlog for testing.
“This is not a Houston problem. It’s not a Texas problem. It’s a nationwide issue that built up over years and years,” Parker said.
___
Follow Juan A. Lozano on Twitter at www.twitter.com/juanlozano70
The day I was diagnosed with anorexia both my parents were with me at my pediatrician’s office, sitting across from me as they struggled to hold back tears.
My parents were the ones involved in my treatment, the people who made sure I was eating each day when I was unable to do so on my own. They were my supporters and cheerleaders all along my journey, taking time out of their lives to bring me to appointments, to Skype my meals, to attend family therapy…
But they were not the only ones.
As this week, Feb. 22-28, is National Eating Disorder Awareness Week, it is important to put the spotlight on awareness in general, and to create a dialogue about the true nature of eating disorders, and that “They Do Not Discriminate.”
People often think of young teenage girls when they picture the population suffering from eating disorders. In reality, they strike men and women of all ages. There are many resources for parents who are looking to be involved in their child’s treatment as many reported or well-known cases of eating disorders strike in the adolescent and young adult population. But there are fewer resources and organizations for the other supports in an individual’s life.
When I was diagnosed my friends, siblings, and boyfriend all wished to help me. Part of the reason that this was difficult was because I had shut down; I didn’t think I needed help, didn’t think they could understand.
They did not see my day-to-day life as my parents did at the time and they were not involved in the feeding or therapy process… but they wanted to help and knew I was in pain. They watched as I morphed into a different person and they felt helpless as I retreated deeper into my disorder.
Any support offered when someone is struggle with an eating disorder is precious. Whether it be parents, relatives, co-workers, etc. Those who provide support often feel a full range of emotions (sadness, fear, frustration, confusion) and the more insight for these individuals — the more support they can be given, the more support they can then provide.
The following are some tips for supporters including siblings, partners, and friends:
• Don’t assume that you don’t matter or can’t have an impact. Your loved one is going through a difficult time and your support is incomparable. You may not understand what s/he is going through, but that doesn’t mean s/he doesn’t want you involved. Hardly anyone can truly understand what it is like to suffer from an eating disorder; what you can do is show him/her that you care and that you want to help. This is not to be done in one easy time. It takes persistent conversation and convincing that you love him/her and just want to be there.
• Test the temperature by creating a space for open communication. Not sure if you can talk about certain subjects? Nervous to talk about food or dieting or even clothes or celebrities? You can ask! There are some topics that should probably be avoided for a while like calories and pounds, etc. But if you aren’t sure, you can express that you want to make it the most comfortable for your loved one and do what feels okay for them.
• You are a strong motivation! I’ve heard countless times that people want to get better so that they can be good role models for their siblings or return to having fun, deep relationships. At the same time, try not to pressure someone. If you’re a motivating factor for your loved one, awesome! You should feel blessed! But don’t use that as pressure. I’ve also heard supporters say, “If you loved me, you’d get better and know that I think you’re beautiful.” The sentiment is there but it completely ignores the deep pain and discomfort the person is experiencing and makes it seem as if recovery is possible but the individual is just being selfish and not “doing it already.”
• Be patient. Recovery takes time… and hold onto hope. More often than not, your loved one isn’t sure if recovery is possible and may look to you for guidance. The moment you doubt it, s/he will know. So although it’s hard, hold onto the hope that things will get better.
• It is important to show the person that you love him/her whether or not s/he has an eating disorder. Sometimes people don’t believe they’re lovable or special or adequate, and showing them and reminding them of this is crucial. Sometimes it helps to start doing activities unrelated to the eating disorder, to show him/her that you want to be with him/her and that’s what matters.
• The person may have different needs at this time. Your sibling, partner, or friend may have used to love certain activities that may not feel comfortable at this time. For partners, intimacy may have changed. Going to the mall may be difficult because trying on clothes can feel overwhelming. Don’t take this as a personal attack. See if you can create a dialogue about what feels comfortable at this time. How can you be helpful at the workplace, in school? What types of activities are safe right now? What type of support does s/he want you to be? Don’t be afraid to gently ask.
• Take time for yourself! I often recommend that close friends/family see a counselor to be able to talk about what it’s like to have this experience. Be sure to take care of yourself and find time to do things just for you. If you aren’t taking care of yourself how can you possibly take care of your loved one?
Those who provide support to individuals suffering are often some of the strongest individuals. It is not easy, and it is not always pleasant, but it is worth it. I would not be here today without the people who showed me I was loved and reminded me not only that I had so much to live for, but that they believed in me, even when I couldn’t believe in myself.
—
If you’re struggling with an eating disorder, call the National Eating Disorder Association hotline at 1-800-931-2237.
I Was Assaulted on Campus 20 Years Ago, and I'm Still 'Carrying That Weight'
Posted in: Today's ChiliAs I surveyed the otherwise familiar Columbia quad on a fall afternoon in 2014, the mattresses caught my eye. At least ten students awkwardly lugged around standard-issue dormitory extra-long twins, some scrawled with denunciations of sexual violence and signatures of support. These students acted in solidarity with Emma Sulkowicz, a fourth-year student who had reported being “raped in her own bed” the first day of her sophomore year and who turned her senior project into a performance-art protest against both sexual violence and the university for its mishandling of her case. Amidst widespread media coverage, Sulkowicz has vowed to carry around her fifty-pound mattress until her alleged rapist, Jean-Paul Nungesser, named publicly by the Columbia Spectator, is expelled.
Exiting campus, I passed hulking St. Luke’s Hospital and remembered the several hours I had spent there during my own Columbia freshman orientation, back in 1996. I had awoken in the middle of the night pinned to my bunk bed by a man who breathed hotly on my face, and in what I will always recall as a uniquely menacing whisper, promised we would “do it again soon.” Disoriented, I somehow convinced him to leave. When I switched on the light, I saw he had removed the cords from my telephone, stolen my keys and brand-new student ID, and, most troublingly, left a pair of men’s shorts behind. So at the advice of my floor’s inexperienced Resident Advisor, I found myself at St. Luke’s, legs splayed open undergoing a rape kit. The nurse confirmed that “nothing had happened,” and I embarked on my freshman year on exactly that premise: NOTHING HAPPENED. I ignored the dean’s nervous voicemails inviting me to “chat over tea” and told no one on the Spectator, where I hoped to build recognition as a writer rather than a victim, especially as it reported on sexual violence more frequently.
I was accompanied on that stroll this fall by another alumna, whom I’ll call Rachel Cohen, who graduated from Barnard in 1969 (Columbia remained all-male until 1982), and who recalled her own experience of campus sexual violence, nearly fifty years before Sulkowicz became a cause célèbre. An activist, Cohen had hosted a dinner at her dorm and connected with one guest, “a soft-spoken” member of the radical, anti-establishment Students for a Democratic Society. This young man had invited her to visit him at his room on campus, where he overpowered her repeated refusals to have sex, then beseeched her “not to be angry.” Back in New York, Cohen located a gynecologist who administered emergency contraception. Shaken, Cohen returned to Barnard, where for a time she redefined her rapist as her boyfriend, “because,” she explained to me, “if we were dating, then what happened between us was OK. I was no longer a victim.” Cohen didn’t share her experience with friends or authorities, and only years later, after she became a feminist, recognized the act as rape and learned that the same man had attempted to coerce a close friend.
So what can the experiences of these three young women, which span over fifty years, teach us? The natural temptation is to assess “progress,” but the historian’s lens of change-over-time is more appropriate. As imperfect as any individual examples — especially those of three heterosexual women on an elite campus — are to assert grand conclusions, these instances help illuminate transformations and continuities in how Americans experience, think, and talk about sex and violence on campuses across the United States, where an estimated 20-25% of college women experience sexual assault. First, the legal and cultural definition of rape has expanded to encompass far more than forcible penetration by a stranger. Secondly, the sexual culture at large, as well as how students expect the institution to regulate it, has transformed. Finally, for all this change, the continuities are most instructive.
It is a result of recent transformations that allows these disparate events to be linked to one another. Today, the idea of a “rape culture” — first elaborated by radical feminists such as Susan Brownmiller in the mid-1970s — has entered common parlance, expanding the understanding of “rape” beyond an instance of coercive intercourse between strangers to include the social hierarchies that enable multiple forms of sexual aggression to occur. In 1968, when Cohen was attacked, the concept of “date rape” did not yet exist. Only when the anti-rape feminist movement coined the term over a decade later did Cohen’s understanding of her experience evolve.
Even in the vastly different historical moment of the mid-1990s, I never wrote or spoke publicly about my own experience because I also did not understand where to place it. I enthusiastically embraced the nurse’s definitive pronouncement that “nothing had happened,” both because it was objectively true by the definition of sexual violence to which I subscribed (namely: penetrative sex) and because it gelled with my self-image as someone to whom such things — things that made me a victim — simply did not occur. At the same time, I knew that something irreversible had occurred, regardless of the rape kit’s verdict: I had learned that my gender made me vulnerable, even in my own bed.
Sulkowicz’ allegation is of rape, but her case is regularly linked to two other allegations of Nungesser’s sexual misconduct: groping one student at a party and sexually and emotionally abusing another during a courtship. His guilt notwithstanding, the fact that groping and “intimate partner violence” now constitute actionable sexual misconduct indicates a significant change in the social construction of sexual violence over the past two decades.
How each of us engaged Columbia also reveals a meaningful shift. In the 1960s, students (like Cohen) had protested campus regulations such as curfews and parietal rules for unfairly constraining and casting moral judgment on their private lives. Such resistance helped dismantle the in loco parentis function of higher education, a change which makes such interventions feel practically quaint today. Still, though the sexual revolution flourished on college campuses, the ideal of female chastity endured; Cohen recalls her ambivalence about admitting she was sexually active, though most college women were engaging in sexual activity. Between this uncertainty and the continued paternalism of higher education, Cohen never sought support from authorities on her own campus or at Columbia where her rape occurred. “Who was I supposed to ask,” she reflected, “the campus doctor who famously claimed the best pill was an aspirin held tightly between the knees?”
By the 1990s, the terrain had shifted dramatically. Even as I did not yet define myself as a feminist (and was mostly unaware of the flourishing campus anti-rape movement that coincided with my time there), the decision to tell the Resident Advisor what happened was instinctual. I had just attended a session on sexual consent at orientation. Such institutional initiatives were becoming common, even as they were scorned by a Saturday Night Live skit about the excesses of political correctness. My friends and I scoffed at the session — a forerunner of today’s “affirmative consent” policies — as irrelevant to the invincible “cool girls” we aspired to be, but the idea that the institution was there to protect us was so assumed we could mock it. If I had any worries about Columbia’s response to my experience, it was that it would “become too big of a deal.”
In the space of a half-century, advocating for sexual justice has changed from fighting to keep the university out of students’ intimate lives to assuming, even demanding, it regulate them more closely, and not only at Columbia. Core to Sulkowicz’ complaint (filed with 28 others) is Columbia’s mishandling of her process; she has filed charges with the Department of Education rather than criminal complaint. Tellingly, in a recent New York Times profile, Nungesser too derides the institution’s response, claiming Columbia’s responsibility to contain the “mob justice” Sulkowicz has created. This arc suggests a rupture between issues on which college women have largely triumphed since Cohen’s day — greater success in educational and professional arenas — and those which prove persistently vexing: questions of sexual autonomy and reproductive justice.
The continuities these three stories reveal are most arresting. Sexual violence has been a consistent facet of college women’s experiences for far longer than the lifespan of the movements that first defined and now fight to eradicate it. At Columbia, a leader in such activism, the first Take Back the Night demonstration occurred in 1988 – twenty years after Cohen’s attack. Equally enduring, however, are the efforts of women to transform their victimization into empowerment on their own terms, terms that have transformed in the last fifty years. To end this perverse rite of passage for college women, we must interrogate the troubling history of campus sexual violence in order to transform the future.
Natalia Mehlman Petrzela is Assistant Professor of History at The New School in New York City. She is the author of Classroom Wars: Language, Sex, and the Creation of Modern Political Culture (Oxford University Press, 2015) and her writing has appeared in various scholarly journals and popular media such as The New York Times and Slate. Her new research focuses on the emergence of wellness culture in the postwar United States. She tweets from @nataliapetrzela.
This post originally appeared on Notches: (re)marks on the history of sexuality, a blog devoted to promoting critical conversations about the history of sex and sexuality. Learn more about the history of sexuality at Notchesblog.com
@media only screen and (min-width : 500px) {.ethanmobile { display: none; }}
Like Us On Facebook |
Follow Us On Twitter |
Contact HuffPost Women