Journalist Juan Thompson Slams Erin Burnett's 'Contemptible' Use Of 'Thug'

CNN journalist Erin Burnett enraged many viewers when she suggested “thugs” was an appropriate word to describe rioters in Baltimore. In a conversation with HuffPost Live on Wednesday, Intercept journalist Juan Thompson echoed the criticisms levied against Burnett, saying he had “nothing but bottomless contempt” for her.

Thompson told host Josh Zepps that Burnett — who, in a Tuesday interview with Baltimore City Councilman Carl Stokes, backed city Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake and President Obama on their usage of the word “thug” — was “practically pissed off that she couldn’t call black people thugs.”

In the CNN interview with Stokes, Burnett added that she hopes she would call her son a thug should he be involved in a similar, violent uprising. Thompson told HuffPost Live the comments were ignorant:

The point is [Burnett’s] son will never be in the case where he has to fear being brutalized and attacked and murdered by Baltimore police. He will never be in the case where his spine will have been severed and his family will be without him for the rest of their lives. For her to sit there in that New York studio, in this elitist, sneering tone, to call black youth who are fighting for their lives and for justice “thugs” was contemptible.

The riots in Baltimore, which have grown violent, were sparked by the death of Freddie Gray, a 25-year-old who died April 19 after he sustained severe spinal injuries while in police custody. The Department of Justice is now investigating Gray’s death.

Sign up here for Live Today, HuffPost Live’s new morning email that will let you know the newsmakers, celebrities and politicians joining us that day and give you the best clips from the day before!

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Why I Stopped Hiding Vegetables

I came across an image of a chef using tweezers to garnish some ornate dish at a white tablecloth restaurant in Europe. Sweat glistened off the chef’s face, his focus was unyielding, his precision inspiring.

My first thought? That looks like me

Not because I’m a Michelin-starred chef or even a chef at all. It looked like me because, up until recently, I too could be found hunched over a dish, typically a quesadilla, attempting to put nearly microscopic pieces of shredded kale into it.

Chef? No. Mom of a toddler? Yes.

This wasn’t the first time I’d found myself eye-level with toddler food. Trying to disguise vegetables or transform them beyond recognition was a daily occurrence in my kitchen.

Adding kale to muffins and stuffing microgreens in cream cheese; the list of atrocious things I’ve done too food only gets worse from there.

After many months of contorting vegetables it occurred to me, after spending a solid 15 minutes trying to position supremely minced tomatoes into a pasta dish, that it was I who had created the very problem I was trying to avoid

Surely there was a better way.

There is a pervasive and misguided belief that young children don’t eat vegetables. Thousands of websites are loaded with tips and tricks to encourage kids to eat their greens. Much of this advice requires additional thought, time and effort on the parent’s part. It’s no wonder that most toddlers don’t get their recommended vegetable intake when so much extra effort is seemingly required.

With this in mind, it became very clear that disguising my toddler’s vegetables was counterproductive and even harmful. I was indirectly telling him that vegetables are repulsive and should be followed with a chaser of cheese or rendered flavorless in baked goods. I was showing him that fresh produce shouldn’t be an integral part of every meal and minimized to the margins of his plate or concealed altogether.

Not exactly a good strategy when trying to raise a well-rounded and healthy eater.

At what point was I going to stop hiding vegetables and when I finally did how was he going to react? I wagered that trying to convince a 4-year-old to eat his greens after years of clandestine vegetable activity was going to be harder than dealing with my then-18-month-old.

Food becomes an issue when you make it an issue. This I’ve learned the hard way. Normalizing a plant-focused and well-rounded diet means letting children come face-to-face with their greens and preparing them in way that honors the plant’s essence.

I stopped hiding and gave vegetables their place at the table. I took him out to the garden and let him plant lettuce, radishes and beans. I encouraged him to eat the vegetables straight from the earth. We ventured into the kitchen to make broths, sauces, and salads. We minced, diced and chopped cucumbers, eggplants and tomatoes together. We massaged cabbage together for sauerkraut and talked.

We connected over food and it paid off. Not overnight and not without more than a few meals left untouched, but gradually it unfolded into something beautiful.

My son connected to his food in a real way and it makes sense for him. He can place what he eats into a larger system that intuitively he knows he is a part of. When you sow a radish seed, check on its growth, help out when it needs a little extra nudge, wait for weeks and then pull it from the earth in all its rooty glory you can’t help but become overwhelmed with the desire to take a big bite; even if you’re two.

Kids must be taught how to eat well. One must take the viewpoint that children will absolutely learn to eat well. If there is no alternative it will make it that much easier to weather the rough points that inevitably come with learning.

I no longer fret about meals, debating whether or not my kid will eat this or that. For the most part, he will. And if he doesn’t, it’s no big deal because he eats such a diverse range of fruits, vegetables and whole grains daily.

At our house, we eat what’s been put in front of us, all of it good and wholesome and then we simply move onto other things.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Might The Sonics Be the Great American Rock Band?

If there is ever a contest to declare The Great American Rock Band, past or present, The Sonics should be high in the running. True, The Beach Boys or R.E.M. or Nirvana are better known and had greater immediate impact, but The Sonics — in the best American tradition — turned their weaknesses into strengths and in so doing created an entire new aesthetic for recognizing rock at its best.

It just took awhile for the nation — the world, actually — to catch up with them. The Tacoma, Washington-originated garage rock band is touring behind its first new album in almost 50 years, “This Is the Sonics.” Three of the current lineup’s five members — guitarist Larry Parypa, lead singer/keyboardist Gerry Roslie and saxophonist Rob Lind — are original Sonics. With them are bassist Freddie Dennis and drummer Dusty Watson.

It wasn’t until the punk and post-punk generation realized, in hindsight, that the 1960s-era DIY band — teenagers inspired by the rebellious attitude of The Rolling Stones, The Yardbirds and Bob Dylan — were one of rock’s most impassioned, unpretentiously authentic and rousing. The Sonics were one of the wildest and most raw garage rock bands around.

Their music belatedly penetrated mass culture. The band’s nasty, snarling rock version of R&B singer Richard Berry’s “Have Love Will Travel,” recorded in 1965 for its debut album, became familiar in recent years thanks to its use in commercials for Land Rover, BMW and Anthony Bourdain’s Parts Unknown TV show, as well as through a notable cover version by The Black Keys. As a result, “Have Love Will Travel” is now giving another of the late Berry’s compositions — “Louie Louie” — competition for being his most famous.

Parypa, the band’s founding guitarist, recalls — with the circumspection of a 68-year-old — how much trepidation the teenage Sonics had about their craft back in the early- and mid-1960s.

“Our feeling was we weren’t legitimate because we couldn’t play quality rock & roll with great finesse and understanding of the music,” he says. “When we would play with some local band that maybe had horns and were good musicians, Gerry and I always felt like maybe we shouldn’t be there.

“We were not doing anything with the quality they did. So we had to do it the only way we could, which was very primitive-sounding. Since we were not all that great, we pounded our instruments. Everybody just put everything they had into playing.”

Told that many rock historians believe The Sonics, in their inspired amateurism, came up with something more memorable than all their more competent contemporaries did, Parypa says, “I don’t know if it’s better, but it certainly was a different approach to rock & roll.”

At the dawn on the 1960s, Tacoma especially was a cauldron for instrumental bands, largely because one local group, The Wailers, had produced a moderate national hit called “Tall Cool One” in 1959, while another, The Ventures, had a chart-topper with 1960’s “Walk Don’t Run.”

“I got into it because my uncle played guitar and brought it over to our house once,” Parypa says of his entry into the rock & roll world as a youngster. “When I heard it go through an amplifier, the sound was just mind-numbing for me. I just loved it.”

The Sonics started as an instrumental band. An early version included Parypa’s brother, and their music-loving mother sometimes played rhythm guitar. But as the lineup evolved and musical trends changed, vocals were added. Roslie began singing for the band in 1964, and that changed everything.

“He had so much emotion,” Parypa says. “The singing and all the trills. So we wanted to utilize his great vocals. Over time, we did no instrumentals and just featured ‘Gerry Roslie Screams.’ “

In the Pacific Northwest, where new local bands like The Kingsmen and Paul Revere & the Raiders were enjoying popularity, The Sonics got signed to a label called, amusingly, Etiquette Records. Three members of The Wailers founded Etiquette, which put out two albums, 1965’s Here Are the Sonics and 1966’s Boom, that are at the heart of The Sonics’ mystique.

Raw and loud, recorded hurriedly and without restraint, their originals had a lyrical sense of danger, darkness and outright weirdness to go with their tumultuous sonic assault. Titles like “Strychnine,” “Psycho” and “He’s Waiting” (about the devil) were unforgettable — at least for the comparatively few nationally who heard them at the time.

“We were not pretty,” Parypa says. “Instead of talking about losing your girlfriend, we were singing about taking strychnine.”

But all things must pass. In 1967, the band switched to another label and made Introducing the Sonics, an album Parypa says everyone hated. (He says another studio album from 1980 bearing the band’s name is inauthentic.) The members moved on to other things after that album, save for a short reunion set in Seattle in the early 1970s.

It wasn’t until a New York promoter got them to headline a garage rock festival called Cavestomp! in 2007 that they realized what they had been missing. Dates in Europe followed. The band has played occasionally since then, but the current tour and new album mark The Sonics most thorough attempt at national exposure since … ever?

The new album was recorded in mono for The Sonics’ own label, Revox, by Jim Diamond, who played with The Dirtbombs and has worked in the studio with a slew of contemporary garage-rock favorites, including Gore Gore Girls, The Mooney Suzuki and The White Stripes. The album has that same raucous, pounding edge as their Etiquette releases. There are several originals, including an unstoppable rave-up called “Bad Betty,” and vitality-injected covers of older songs, including a revved-up version of The Kinks’ “The Hard Way.” It’s an impressive return.

“Many musicians who have stuck with music and developed and evolved over the last 50 years wouldn’t know how to go back and pretend they’re 16,” Parypa says. “But it was easier for us. We didn’t allow ourselves to become good.

“So here we are just hacking away, the same as we did back then.”

(This story originally appeared in Cincinnati CityBeat in advance of an April performance at that city’s Woodward Theater. The photo was provided by The Sonics and is by Merri Sutton.)

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Lousy College Counseling for Bright Kids From Poor Homes

In a week that was dominated by stories of civil unrest, perhaps one of the most important discussions related to social justice went unnoticed: The U.S. House Subcommittee on Higher Education held a hearing on “Improving College Access and Completion for Low-Income and First-Generation Students.” It explored existing institutional efforts to better serve disadvantaged students and discuss possible policy changes to strengthen federal programs with the goal of increasing college access and completion.

If we truly care about things like the economic inequality or class mobility, putting more degrees in the hands of academically talented young people from poor areas is certainly a way to make a significant difference. And it turns out that one of the best and simplest ways to do that is by redefining the roles of guidance counselors, an immensely valuable but forgotten resource in public schools.

When people think of guidance counselors, most think of counseling on behavioral issues, teaching study skills, assisting in career planning, and facilitating class scheduling. These are all accurate assumptions, but missing among them is what should be one of the most important duties of a guidance counselor — providing college advisement.

It’s a classic case of perception becoming reality. According to a recent study by the National Association of College Admission Counseling (NACAC), a majority of guidance counselors report their department spends less than 20 percent of their time on college readiness, selection, and applications. From a student’s viewpoint, college counseling may not seem to be a priority, so they often don’t seek the help of a guidance counselor when they are thinking about their options after high school. Not surprisingly, the study also found that only three percent of students chose a high school counselor as most important in shaping their educational vision.

The consequences are extremely troubling, especially for high achieving, low-income students. An analysis of data from the Department of Education’s Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002 found that one in five high school graduates who scored in the top academic quartile in 10th grade and who simultaneously comes from a family in the bottom economic quartile does not even enroll in college. In addition, more than half of these academically talented but economically challenged students do not apply for financial aid, and nearly a quarter do not take the SAT or ACT.

If they do manage to apply, more often than not they choose a school that is less rigorous than their high abilities would permit. They are “undermatched” because they don’t understand that more selective institutions may well be more affordable than the second- or third-tier institutions they are attending.

The reason for the bad advisement may not lie entirely with the counselor’s lack of training or inability; the average public school counselor in the U.S. has a caseload of 476 students. That’s not individualized college counseling; that’s crowd control. In short, lower-income students would be more likely to rely on guidance from school counselors, but the burdens many counselors face prohibit meaningful college advising.

Local school systems need to provide a pathway to success for students, whether through a school-based approach or through a partnership with a college access network. Pathways do not need to be traditional; they can look to use high-tech approaches including by providing online or mobile resources.

Local school systems should also advocate for high-performing, low-income students by identifying students to colleges so they can be recruited. Coordinating with postsecondary schools so as to offer “high school to college transition programs” will help prepare students for success in college. And once a student has graduated, they should be tracked; the NACAC reports that only 58 percent of schools track what their former students do after high school.

States could do their part by providing local schools with high-quality information to share with students about applying for financial aid and scholarships, about the benefits of applying to highly competitive colleges, and about college application fee waivers, standardized testing fee waivers, and the like.
These tasks would best be carried out by a dedicated college counselor with proper training. Unfortunately, less than two-fifths of counselors the NACAC surveyed said their school had a counselor whose primary responsibility was college applications and/or selection.

Researchers Caroline Hoxby and Sarah Turner of Stanford University and the University of Virginia, respectively, have demonstrated a successful approach through their “Expanding College Opportunities” program, which provided application guidance, information about net college costs, and fee waivers to high-achieving, low-income students (identified after taking the ACT or SAT) at a minimal cost of $6 per student. The results were stunning: they increased students’ applications to selective colleges by 56 percent and ultimately those who received support were 46 percent more likely to enroll in a “matched institution” (one whose student credentials matched the applying student’s). If academic researchers can provide this kind of program effectively, imagine the value of entire state agencies stepping in.

Emphasis on basic achievement and increasing high school graduation rates, worthy topics to be sure, have had the unintended consequence of causing many schools to neglect excellence. We need low-income students who are at the top of the class, who often come from disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds, to meet their full potential; if history is any guide, they are likely to be the next generation of innovators, business people and scholars.

We also need to level the playing field. While high-income students can hire expensive private college counselors to ensure they are accepted to Ivy League schools, high-achieving, low-income students are lucky to have a ten-minute discussion with their counselor about one of life’s more important decisions, college. Schools need to start making these students and their college futures a priority.

So the real story this week–the one most important for the long term–wasn’t on the streets. It was on Capitol Hill, in college admissions offices, and in high school guidance departments across the country. That story needs to be told more often.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

3 Reasons Why You Should Try Mineral Sunscreen

mineral sunscreen

Photo Credit: Getty Images

Mineral sunscreens are made with physical UV blockers like zinc oxide and/or titanium dioxide, and they’ve gotten a bad rap over the years because of the thick white residue they tend to leave behind. But as New York City-based dermatologist Dr. Barney Kenet explains, there are a few reasons why they should not be overlooked:

1. Mineral sunscreens are believed to cause less skin irritation for people with sensitive skin than other UV absorbing chemicals.

2. Their active ingredients are also considered to be safer alternatives to chemical sunscreens. A 2012 National Toxicology Program study showed that a type of vitamin A found in most chemical sunscreens “may speed the development of skin tumors and lesions when applied to the skin in the presence of sunlight.”

3. Zinc oxide, a main ingredient in most mineral sunscreen, is also the only active sunscreen ingredient approved for use on children by the FDA.

While Kenet believes “there really is no perfect sunscreen,” consistent use and reapplication every two hours will guard against harmful sun exposure. However, be cautious when trying out new formulas: Kenet points out that some people have allergic reactions to mineral sunscreen, so users should get into the habit of patch testing before applying all over.

“The safest ‘sunscreen’ is wearing protective clothing: rash guards, hats and long sleeve shirts,” he added. “This is great for your skin and the environment.”

If you’re not sure where to start on your mineral sunscreen search, below are seven SPF products worth adding to your sun protection line-up:

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Video: The first flight of Blue Origin's cool new suborbital spaceship

Blue Origin, the private space rocket company owned by Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, just posted highlights from their first test rocket launch and it’s pretty damn cool. The Blur Origin New Shepard vertical takeoff, vertical landing spacecraft blasted off and reached a height of 58 miles before separating from its rocket and parachuting back to Earth.

Read more…


Scientists Are Trying to Change All Blood Into Type O

If you know anything about blood types, then you know how they add an extra wrinkle to blood donations. Match donor and recipient blood types incorrectly, and you could even kill a patient. That’s why scientists are working on artificially changing donated blood into type O, the universal donor.

Read more…



Yes, Windows 10 Is Coming This Summer–But Only For PCs

We already knew that the next version of Windows was slated to arrive sometime this summer (and for free !)—but it wasn’t completely clear what that meant.

Read more…



Shooting Challenge: Breakfast

From Captain Crunch to miso soup, we all eat differently each morning. It’s highly regional. It’s remarkably personal. It’s your breakfast. For this week’s Shooting Challenge, photograph your breakfast.

Read more…



Microsoft’s iOS, Android app porting tools now open

sneakersDevelopers can now start porting their Android and iOS apps to Windows, if they dare. Yesterday, Microsoft announced a suspiciously easy tool that allows Developers to port their iOS and Android apps to the Windows platform. On stage, Microsoft demoed an Android app running on a Windows Phone like it was made for the platform. Now, Project Islandwood (iOS) and Project … Continue reading