Shocking Jail Surveillance Footage Captures Louisiana Jail Guard Attack Inmate Marcus Robicheaux

Surveillance footage was released Thursday showing a Louisiana jail guard attack an inmate, seemingly without provocation

In the video, obtained by The New Orleans Advocate, Iberia Parish Jail inmate Marcus Robicheaux can be seen standing against a wall, while guards conduct a sweep for contraband.

The inmate appears to be looking forward, with his hands on his head, when sheriff’s deputy David Prejean grabs him from behind and throws him to the ground. Prejean then proceeds to punch and kick Robicheaux, who does not appear to be resisting, while the deputy’s dog bites him in the arms, legs and torso.

The three-minute video, recorded on Dec. 6, 2012, was only recently viewed by jail officials, after it was subpoenaed during a federal grand jury investigation into the alleged abuse of inmates at the jail.

QUESTIONABLE LOUISIANA CASES

Iberia Parish Sheriff Louis Ackal reportedly fired Prejean after viewing the footage.

Robicheaux denies any wrongdoing and told The Advocate he has no idea what prompted Prejean to single him out that day.

“He picked me out. Why? I don’t know,” Robicheaux said. “I still ask myself that to this day.”

Robicheaux’s case is now part of an FBI investigation into the sheriff’s office. The bureau is also reportedly looking at two other cases, including the 2014 death of Victor White. The sheriff’s office claims the 22-year-old man shot and killed himself while handcuffed in the back of an Sheriff’s Office patrol car.

@media only screen and (min-width : 500px) {.ethanmobile { display: none; }}

Like Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter
Contact The Author

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Boehner Warns 'Thousands Of Jobs' On The Line If Ex-Im Bank Expires

WASHINGTON — House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said on Thursday that “thousands of jobs” are at risk if one of his own party members does nothing on the impending expiration of the Export-Import Bank.

Boehner’s comments put him at odds with House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas), who has made clear he wants to let the bank expire.

“Listen I support any plan that the chairman can get through his committee, whether it would reform the bank, wind it down — but there are thousands of jobs on the line that would disappear pretty quickly if the Ex-Im bank were to disappear,” Boehner said.

The Ex-Im Bank is the nation’s export credit agency, helping companies sell goods and services overseas. Opponents like Hensarling argue the bank essentially promotes “corporate welfare,” propping up big businesses. Proponents of reauthorization, however, say the bank helps U.S. businesses stay competitive in international markets.

The bank’s charter is set to expire at the end of June, and Boehner said he has urged Hensarling to take action quickly.

“So I told the chairman he needs to come up with a plan. Because the risk is if he does nothing, the Senate is likely to act, and then what,” Boehner said, hinting that he may have no choice but to hold a vote on whatever the Senate passes.

The second- and third-ranking Republicans in Boehner’s leadership team, however, see things differently, and have expressed their support of ending the bank’s charter.

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) told reporters earlier this week that he still opposes reauthorizing the bank. House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) has also said he would like to let it expire.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

A Tale of Two Modis

interpreter

“India First.” This phrase, used liberally by the then Indian prime ministerial candidate from Gujarat, Narendra Modi, captured the imagination of many Indians because it responded to the Indian moment.

In 2013-14, candidate Modi and his Bharatiya Janata Party were determined to restore a semblance of pride in a population scarred by corruption scandals and government bloopers. The national shame resulting from the ghastly rape of December 2012 destroyed brand India and darkened the national mood. And the economy, India’s invincible proposition to the world for over a decade, began to head south. The nation was restless and impatient. There was a growing clamor for strong leadership.

This was the India of just over two years ago, when #NaMo began to trend on social media. This was when candidate Modi would have sensed that he had a fair chance of winning. This was also when the “man of action,” the new loh purush (“man of steel”), made his promises to an expectant nation and laid out his vision of a re-energized India.

modi campaign
BJP leader Modi shows his inked finger to supporters as he leaves a polling station after voting on April 30, 2014 in Ahmedabad, India. (Photo by Kevin Frayer/Getty Images)

Nearly a year later, it is a good moment to reflect on that promise.

It would be fair to say that there seem to be two Modis. The first is Prime Minster Modi on the world stage, a rock star when he’s abroad and when he receives foreign dignitaries. He is flamboyant in resetting the India narrative in Western capitals and closing in on lucrative partnerships in Asia. He has injected new dynamism in how India engages with its neighborhood. He deploys slick messaging and leverages the Indian diaspora to create a sense of optimism. The U.S. president waxes eloquent about him in TIME and even the Germans acknowledge the masterful conduct of the “Make in India” outreach at their prestigious industrial fair.

Then there is the prime minister at home, with a different look and feel about him.

He is determined at one level, as he stakes his political capital on reforming the land acquisition law, and while pushing forth a slew of new initiatives like replacing the economic planning body (the Planning Commission) with a contemporary organization. On the other hand, you sense there are some wrinkles that are yet to be ironed out. There are times when you can see him pensively watching parliamentary proceedings as the lack of majority in the upper house impedes him. There is reluctance while communicating his vision and policies, and an inability to deploy the same communication means to reach out to citizens that got him the top job in the first place.

Clearly then, as we clock in year one, there is much to be done at home for the Indian prime minister, if the disconnect between the external messaging and the politics at home is to be reconciled.

India’s most powerful proposition to the world remains an India that offers opportunity to Indians and to others who want to engage with it. It was on this promise of hope, domestic reform and growth that Modi was elected. His election slogans held a two-fold promise: Acche din aane wale hain (“good days are about to come”), and na khaoonga, na khaane doonga (“neither will I take bribes nor will I allow others to”). These slogans alluded first to a government that delivers on its promises and is sensitive to the aspirations of youth, and second to a commitment to systemic reform, with corruption a metaphor for bad governance.

Once the scale of his victory became clear, the prime minister’s first tweet was ache din aa gaye (“good days have come”). Implicit in this declaration was that his election was a mandate for change and that change would be rapid, not incremental. If expectations of the new government were high, it was because Modi himself led India to expect a tectonic shift.

“Ultimately, for Modi to sell the Incredible India story, he will need to make India credible.”

The Modi campaign was clever in seizing upon a rare confluence of the needs of big businesses and the bottom of the pyramid. Both needed financial sector reforms and innovation. While at one end investable capital was needed through creative instruments, at the other end basic financial inclusion, distress loans and lifeline banking were crucial.

Big businesses sought employable human capital to scale up operations, to climb global value chains and to optimize labor productivity (about one-fifth of China’s). The bottom of the pyramid needed skilling initiatives, basic education, digital literacy and technical education that would allow them to participate in the modern economy and make their “mom and pop” operations more profitable.

Both big business and small operations needed market access, roads, ports, energy and digital highways that would allow them to compete in the global marketplace. To deliver on these was essentially the “Modi Promise.”

So it was not surprising that in his early days he rolled out the “universal banking scheme” (Jan Dhan Yojana), the Digital India Initiative and the “skilling” initiatives alongside the “Make in India” thrust. Earlier this year, in its first full budget, the Modi government announced schemes to support micro-enterprises, innovation start-ups and a pro-industry economic orientation that was appreciated by many. The Finance Commission recommendations on federalizing tax receipts and giving more to state governments was accepted. Several social sector and welfare schemes were left to the autonomous design of state governments. India was seen to be moving towards a more decentralized system that resonated with the campaign promise of “More Governance, Less Government.”

While the schemes and initiatives announced were on the ball, some of the tactics and processes that their success may depend upon need to be rethought and reorganized. Four in particular need attention.

1. First, the PM may have to oversee a more sophisticated management of parliament. BJP has to reach out to a variety of political actors in the upper house of parliament (and their own coalition partners) effectively. They are unlikely to have the numbers for a few years and the country may run out of patience before then.

2. The second would be to be mindful of the contradiction between seeking to expand one’s political base across the country while at the same time striving to deliver economic restructuring that responds to promises and expectations. As the political expansion takes place, policy compromises may seem tempting and could dilute the “Modi mandate.” Already the talk in some circles is that the real opposition the prime minister faces is within his party. The nationalist and insular component of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (the parent organization of the ruling party) is vocal in its opposition to a number of forward-looking measures the government may opt for, be it issue foreign investment in certain sectors, labor reform or the reorganization of the food and agriculture sectors.

3. The third is the fundamental tension between the centralization and concentration of power within the prime minister’s office, and the ambition to federalize and devolve governance horizontally and vertically. The prime minister’s office is already under some flak for empire building, delays and inefficiency. What worked in Gujarat may not work for India.

4. And finally, the PM’s core instinct to operate through the bureaucracy (or a select few among them) may preclude the possibility of lateral hiring of talent that many of his key initiatives do need. While the chief minister-civil servant duopoly served Modi well in Gujarat, the decision-making high table may well have to be enlarged if real change is to be effected in New Delhi.

The government’s honeymoon is perhaps already over and realistically it has another six to 12 months to start putting flesh on the bare-bone schemes and ideas announced this past year. If these do not eventuate, one may well witness emptier stadiums abroad and hear shriller voices at home. Ultimately, for PM Modi to sell the Incredible India story, he will need to make India credible.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Separated at Birth: Football Coach Tom Parr, Football Founder Walter Camp

NFL drafts come and go.

Football legends remain.

When Tom Parr, longtime football coach of Hopkins, one of the oldest prep schools in the country, retires on June 14, the ghost of Walter Camp, father of the modern game of football, will hover nearby in New Haven, Conn.

2015-04-30-1430414125-4078889-220pxWalter_Camp__Project_Gutenberg_eText_18048.jpg

Camp, a graduate of Hopkins, which was founded in 1660, later studied at Yale, where he not only captained and coached the Elis starting in the late 1870s, he essentially invented football as we know it today. He devised the line of scrimmage, which revolutionized the sport from its origins as a rugby scrum. He introduced the down system, the number of players on each side of the line of scrimmage, the idea of penalties, the quarterback position, and of course the concept of the gridiron itself.

Parr, who coached at Hopkins for thirty-three seasons, may not have invented the game, but he turned around a program that was accustomed to losing, and he made it a perennial power in the Fairchester League.

Under Parr’s leadership, the Hilltoppers won 206 games and lost 74. The winningest coach in Hopkins football history, Parr led the school to seven league championships, four New England prep titles and four undefeated seasons.

Parr never produced any pros or NFL draftees, but the very first professional football player, according to tradition, was Pudge Heffelfinger, a lineman at Yale, who traced his roots back to, you guessed it, Walter Camp.

On June 14, Hopkins head of school Barbara Riley will present the Hopkins Medal, the school’s highest honor, to Parr, a man whose accomplishments go far beyond his wins as a coach.

Like Walter Camp, who instilled in generations of young men the values of integrity, courage and what was then referred to as “muscular Christianity,” Parr has stressed to his troops the importance of “true teamwork, sacrifice, loyalty to players next to you, sportsmanship,” as he mentioned over the phone on April 27.

He has ably fulfilled Hopkins’ original mission: to foster the “breeding up of hopeful youths.”

Besides providing lessons about leadership, Parr has also taught his players the proper techniques of the game, in particular the proper tackling technique. That may be one of his greatest legacies, given the acute dangers posed by the sport.

“The most important thing was safety,” Parr said.

“Andrew (Levy) and those guys,” he added, speaking of one of the starting linemen from his first Hopkins team, the 1982 squad, “they counted more than the game.” Parr said that if you don’t protect your players, “you have no business in coaching.”

2015-04-30-1430414204-5995172-60e55e427792400597a08ed1fa2fc9de.jpg

While some coaches are only now starting to focus on safety issues, Parr never allowed his players to lead with their heads. He always taught his players to put their “face in the football” and “shoulder into the body.”

Parr’s laurels come at a time when football has been battered by negative publicity. The NFL bungled the Ray Rice case, one of many domestic violence scandals involving pro football players in the not too distant past. Aaron Hernandez, recently convicted of murder, is only the latest example of a football player who has been implicated in homicide and other felonies.

Some commentators, notably Keith Olbermann, have called for a boycott of the upcoming NFL draft due to the league’s failure to take a hard stance against players who have committed spousal abuse or domestic violence, among other crimes.

Dan Barry’s front-page column in the New York Times‘ sports section on April 27 about Patrick Risha, a former Dartmouth running back, whose life spiraled out of control and ended with suicide, illustrated another peril of the sport. Near the end of that piece, a post-mortem on Risha’s brain revealed that he had chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a degenerative brain condition associated with repeated head trauma.

It is the same condition that was found in the brain tissue of NFL greats Junior Seau, who also committed suicide, and Mike Webster, to name just two former players.

Football apologists have tried to downplay these tragedies as isolated ones, but no one can deny the inherently violent nature of the sport, not Walter Camp, not Tom Parr.

Studies show that repeated head trauma from football, as well as other contact sports, can lead to neurological disorders such as CTE, ALS, Alzheimer’s and other illnesses.

This past week, a federal judge approved a multimillion-dollar settlement to a class-action lawsuit between the NFL and thousands of former players. The lawsuit accused the NFL of concealing the detrimental effects of concussions on the long-term health of players.

Way ahead of his time in emphasizing safety, Parr had a rule that he would minimize hitting at practice. “We were always thin in depth,” he said, so we would “hit dummies, hit bags, practice form tackles” during the week.

Other coaches now employ similar safety measures, but Parr, showing great foresight, did this for thirty-three years at Hopkins. The result was not only a record number of wins but also very few concussions.

Don Bagnall, the head trainer on the football squad since 1982, spoke of the precautions Tom Parr took for the players.

“The kids’ welfare always came first, physically and mentally. It was always in the forefront.”

Bagnall let his son play four years for Coach Parr. “With the proper coaching, the proper equipment, the proper medical staff,” Bagnall said, the risks of the game can be mitigated.

Of Parr’s legacy, Bagnall referred to “the amount of mental preparation” Parr brought to the game. “His practice plans, especially his game plans. He just outcoached the opposition.”

Despite all of Parr’s preparation and his emphasis on safety, Bagnall mentioned that one Hopkins player endured a serious head and spinal injury on the field. That student did not play football again, but he made a full recovery from spinal stenosis, according to Bagnall.

Over the past thirty-three years, some Hopkins players did get their “bells rung,” a somewhat affectionate football term that does not convey the potential severity of a single concussion.

Andrew Levy, a veteran of the 1982 squad, who squared up against bigger linemen, said that he and Dave Amendola, a star on that offensive and defensive line, may have experienced minor concussions. But that was not due to the way they were coached. It was due to the brutality of the sport.

Parr recognizes the dangers of football and said that its future may be “different” from anything we can anticipate. He pointed out that the rules are already changing. For instance, he said that players are supposed to be penalized with flagrant fouls when they lead with their head. That does not mean that those rules are always enforced.

Walter Camp would have endorsed Parr’s approach and would likely have approved of the new rules. After all, he originated the notion of penalties, and he played a major role on the football rules committee, authorizing changes in the game, until his death in 1925.

While pro football, in spite of its recent controversies, gained top Nielsen ratings this past season, even President Obama, a fan of the sport, stated that, if he had a son, he would have to think “long and hard” as to whether he would let him play the game.

Such caution is not new.

In the early 1900s, more than one hundred years ago, Walter Camp led a delegation to the White House to advise President Teddy Roosevelt about football, which then, as now, was known for its barbarism.

Players back then wore minimal pads and head gear.

Unfortunately, helmets, which were designed to improve the safety of the sport, have not infrequently been used as a weapon to ram opponents.

When we spoke over the phone, Parr said that in addition to the changes in the rules, he is hopeful that manufacturers can design safer helmets.

But the key again is teaching the proper tackling technique. Parr, who has three sons, said that he never hesitated in encouraging them to play football.

His son, Gary, rushed for approximately 225 yards in a 28-21 victory over Tabor Academy, a team with linemen in the 300-pound range, for the New England championship in 2000, one of Parr’s favorite moments as a coach.

While Parr has had great success at Hopkins, his career did not begin auspiciously. His squad in 1982, his debut year, had a record of 1-5, scoring only 25 points all season, 13 of them against South Kent, the team’s only win.

At the time, Hopkins often played schools with a much larger enrollment and in some cases with post-graduate students.

The 1981 Hopkins team, which went 1-6-1, faced Avon Old Farms, where Edwin Esson, a former Parade All-American at Seymour High School and one of the leading rushers in Connecticut history, spent an additional season as a post-graduate. According to Andrew Levy’s best recollection, Esson rushed for some 200 yards without even playing the fourth quarter, as Avon trounced the Hilltoppers that day.

That was not atypical of the kind of opponent Hopkins faced back then. Kent, Taft, Suffield and other schools with big-time football programs often overpowered the Hilltoppers.

When Parr took over in 1982, Hopkins suffered to an extent from an absence of what some have characterized quaintly as “school spirit.”

It was not that there had been no good football teams at Hopkins in the years just before Parr arrived. The 1980 squad, coached by Tyler Chase, had a 4-3-1 record. That team featured two of the best backs in Hopkins’ history: Teddy White, known for his spin moves, who retired as Hopkins’ all-time leading rusher and played college ball at the University of New Hampshire; and Phil Stanley, one of the speediest track stars among schoolboys in Connecticut, who later captained the basketball team at Tufts.

There were some Saturdays when White and Stanley each topped 100 yards rushing.

More often than not, though, the Hopkins squads of the late 1970s and early 1980s struggled to win games.

As a college preparatory school committed to “the breeding up of hopeful youths,” Hopkins has always been known for its academics.

Over the course of its long history, the school has graduated such luminaries as Walter Camp; composer Charles Ives; Colonel House, an adviser to President Woodrow Wilson; and John Malone, the telecommunications pioneer. (Full disclosure: This reporter graduated from Hopkins in 1983.)

But school spirit often derives from the success of a sports program. And football, more than other sports, typically sets the tone at the scholastic and collegiate levels.

Back in 1982, the football program at Hopkins was languishing. But it was about to undergo a renaissance that would restore it to a luster worthy of Walter Camp.

Andrew Levy, who runs Wish You Were Here Productions, a sports marketing agency based in New York, started as an offensive and defensive lineman on Parr’s 1982 squad.

Since he graduated from Lehigh University in 1987, Levy has served as a marketing agent for professional athletes, coaches and managers, arranging personal appearances, product endorsements and speaking engagements. He has also sold sports memorabilia, highlighted by the auctioning of Don Larsen’s uniform from his perfect game in the 1956 World Series.

Over the years, Levy has worked with and/or represented hundreds of sports figures, such as Ottis Anderson, a Super Bowl MVP; Walt Frazier, a two-time NBA champion with the New York Knicks; David Cone, a five-time World Series champ and Cy Young Award winner; Goose Gossage, a Hall of Fame reliever and World Series champ with the New York Yankees; and Joe Torre and Joe Girardi, Yankee managers past and present.

Though he works regularly with Hall of Famers, Levy all these years later remains impressed with Coach Parr.

“Before we even knew him, we thought, ‘here’s this All-American quarterback from Colgate, who coached at Jonathan Law, a public school with some tough kids, a big-time football program. Why? Why does he want to come here to coach football’s version of The Bad News Bears?'”

Right away, Coach Parr introduced “a lot of structure” with morning and afternoon workouts in August, to which the team was unaccustomed.

Exercises as simple as the timed one-mile run left captain Rich Ridinger and other veteran players like Seth Stier “puking” on the first day of practice.

Andrew Levy, upon finishing the run, felt tingling and numbness in his right hand. He thought he was having a stroke and as a result got an MRI at Yale-New Haven Hospital, which revealed that he had nothing more than a migraine.

As a precaution, Coach Parr, always emphatic about player safety, then excused Levy from all the remaining workouts.

When he returned to practice, Levy beamed and, in reference to his time in the one-mile run, boasted to his teammates, “Six minutes, fourteen seconds! And excused from double sessions!”

If that 1982 squad consisted of a bunch of lovable losers, Parr never let his players feel that they were other than winners. He inspired them, as he would inspire his championship teams, with his work ethic, his loyalty and his dedication to the scholar-athlete ideal, all of which came through in his speeches.

While Walter Camp, who had a penchant for alliteration, originated terms such as All-America (the precursor to today’s All-American) and Daily Dozen, the fitness regimen he created for out-of-shape servicemen preparing for World War I, Tom Parr has likewise demonstrated a way with words.

Before the first game of the 1982 season, Parr called the players into the coaches area in the back of the locker room.

Levy recounted the moment, which was told at a reunion banquet by a teammate, Jason Lichtenstein. “We squeezed in there. And it stinks. There’s no ventilation, and he gives this very motivational Knute Rockne-like speech, but he tells it in a soft way. Then at the end, he screams, ‘How far?’ We yelled, ‘All the way!’ Then he screamed, ‘Gonna quit?’ and we yelled, ‘No way!'”

2015-04-30-1430414330-6406725-7ed35de736254a258cddcf2f9b8541ae.jpg

That call-and-response became one of Coach Parr’s signature Parr-isms.

Other Parr-isms have included, “Success is not a destination, but a continuous journey,” a Zen-like adage that sounds familiar to those who remember the Nike commercial about life being a journey, not a spectator sport.

That some of the Parr-isms have had a familiarity to them has not detracted from their wisdom.

The most famous Parr-ism, according to Levy, was another call-and-response routine that evoked an old saying about boxing champ Joe Louis, who was said to be a credit to his race, the human race.

Parr’s formulation went as follows: “It’s a great day for a race!” Parr would yell.

“What race?” the players would shout.

“The human race!”

Levy summed up Coach Parr’s philosophy with a story Parr told at the football banquet at the end of that 1-5 season in 1982 and that Levy repeated in 2007 at the 25th anniversary celebration of Parr’s career at Hopkins.

As befits a Zen master, Parr told a parable about an optimist and a pessimist. The pessimist is upset about receiving a Rolex watch for Christmas, whereas the optimist rejoices in receiving manure.

Why? Because the optimist knows, he just knows, that somewhere, around the house, gallops a new horse!

As Levy said at the 25th anniversary celebration, “Coach Parr, on behalf of the senior class of 1983, your inaugural season, we are proud to have been your manure, and we congratulate you on finding your horse.”

Dave Amendola, the star of that inaugural squad, later captained the football team at the University of Connecticut where he played for coach Tom Jackson. In his senior year, Amendola led the Huskies to the Yankee conference co-championship with an 8-3 record, including a 5-0 mark at home.

Amendola, who stood at 6’3″ and weighed close to 250 pounds when he suited up for Hopkins, was extremely quick for a man his size. Though he may not have played in the pros, Amendola was a pro-caliber lineman, who, Parr said, may have been the best player he ever coached.

Amendola grew up in the 1970s, roaming the sidelines as a ball boy for the Yale Bulldogs. He spent years under the tutelage of his late dad, Buddy, a longtime defensive coordinator for Yale football guru Carm Cozza, who reigned as dean of Ivy League coaches from 1965 to 1996.

Buddy later headed up the program at Central Connecticut State University.

When asked to compare Parr to all the football masters he observed in his day, Amendola said, “He’s right there with the legends. He changed me dramatically, transformed me from an adolescent to a man.”

Amendola, who was named most improved player at UConn when he was a sophomore, would also win the Yankee conference player of the week award a few times.

“It all started with him (Parr) molding us at Hopkins.”

A father of three, Amendola has a 14-year-old son, who played a bit of youth football. But Amendola has not encouraged his son to play the sport because of its inherent violence. “Unless he gets the killer instinct,” said Amendola, he does not want his son out on the gridiron. He is glad that his son, who is 6′ 4″, is focusing for now on tennis and basketball.

Like Amendola, Tom Parr did not make it into the NFL. But he too was a pro-caliber player even if he stood only 5′ 9 3/4″. An ECAC all-star at Colgate during his senior year in 1973, he was joined in the All-East backfield that year by John Cappelletti, the Heisman Trophy winner, and Tony Dorsett, who won the Heisman a few years later.

A speedster and an escape artist, Tom Parr ran the 40 yard dash in 4.6 seconds. “You didn’t see a lot of 4.4’s back then,” he said.

That Tom Parr was an outstanding runner links him once again to Walter Camp.

Camp was not only the founder of the game, as well as its greatest strategist and coach with a record of 67-2 at Yale; he was also a gifted running back. While he was alive, Camp was often compared to Odysseus, primarily because he was such a fleet and evasive runner, like the Greek hero from Homer’s epic poem, The Odyssey.

Perhaps, it is poetic justice that Parr hails from Ithaca, though he grew up in upstate New York, not Greece.

His father was a great quarterback as a young man, and so was Parr, who began playing when he was around 12 years old.

He turned down West Point to go to Colgate, where he quarterbacked the Raiders for three seasons.

The Raiders, who won the NCAA title in 1932 and have a rich football heritage, going back to the 1890s, had a middling record while Parr led the squad. The team had slightly more wins than losses during that time, compiling records of 6-4 in 1971, 5-4-1 in 1972, and 5-5 in 1973.

Even if the team did not win any titles while Parr was a student, he excelled on the playing field. He led Colgate to a 55-21 victory over Lafayette to open the 1973 season. In that game, Parr rushed for three touchdowns and passed for four more, setting a Colgate record for most combined touchdowns that stands to this day.

Parr was named the Associated Press’ Back of the Week for his performance.

He was profiled in Sports Illustrated under the headline, “No breaking this Parr.”

The subhed read, “Colgate’s Tom Parr, an unlikely looking quarterback, makes an inviting target, but every time he gets hit, he bounces up to set another record.”

Following that record-setting game, Lafayette coach Neil Putnam told the Telegraph, a paper based in Nashua, N.H., “Tom Parr is the finest option quarterback I have faced. He possesses the size, speed and skill to run the wishbone offense and does so with perfection.”

Parr was one of the top rushing quarterbacks in the nation in the early 1970s. He ran for 2,200 yards in his three years, a total that nearly equaled his passing yardage of approximately 3,000 yards. When he was a senior, he rushed for 833 yards with eight TDs. He averaged 6.5 yards per carry, which was the tenth best mark in the nation in 1973.

He also finished tenth in the country in total yards (rushing and passing combined) with 1,960 in 1973. And in 1972, he finished seventh in total touchdowns (rushing and passing) with 21.

In his final game as a collegiate player, Parr led the Raiders to a 42-0 rout over Rutgers, a team that had whipped Colgate the year before.

Parr, who called his own plays much of the time in high school and college, remembered that final game. He scarcely ran the ball in the second half. Knowing that the scouts were watching fullback Mark Van Eeghen for the East-West Shrine Game, “We kept feeding Mark and feeding him.”

Van Eeghen played well in the Shrine game and had a fine pro career. He surpassed 1,000 yards rushing for three consecutive years (1976 through 1978) in the NFL. He was a key player on the Oakland Raiders in the 1970s and early 1980s, starring on Super Bowl-winning teams in 1977 and 1981.

Yet in 1972, Parr, a modest man who rarely talks about his own accomplishments, actually ran for more yardage than Van Eeghen.

Parr’s former coach at Colgate, Neil Wheelwright, left no doubt as to who was the best player on his team.

After Parr’s record-setting game against Lafayette to open the 1973 season, the Telegraph of Nashua, N.H., quoted Wheelwright as saying this of his star quarterback: Parr “is the finest player I’ve ever coached. He’s a perfect option quarterback because he conceals what he’s going to do until the last moment and then he’ll either beat you by running, passing or giving the ball to a back.”

Mark Van Eeghen, whom I phoned on April 30, agreed with Coach Wheelwright that Parr was “without a doubt” the best player on the team.

“He was so far before his time,” said Van Eeghen from Providence, R.I., where he works in the insurance industry. “The quarterbacks coming out now with their mobility and shiftiness, run and pass, that was Tom all the way. That was the epitome of him.”

Van Eeghen, who speaks with a trace of a New England accent, added that Parr “had that confidence, that swagger, that twinkle in his eye in the huddle. He was a calming influence on the team, the coach on the field.”

Like Parr, Van Eeghen is an extremely modest man. He led the AFC in rushing in 1978 when he finished just a few yard short of Walter Payton for the league rushing title.

Unlike many former players, Van Eeghen has experienced neither cognitive decline, nor any debilitating injuries from playing football.

That is not to say that he did not get his bell rung a few times. “You can’t play in the NFL as a fullback for ten years” without taking some hits, he said.

Running behind linemen Gene Upshaw and Art Shell, Van Eeghen and tailback Clarence Davis romped through the Minnesota Vikings’ famed Purple People Eaters in Super Bowl XI. Van Eeghen also played well in the Raiders’ Super Bowl victory in 1981 over the Philadelphia Eagles.

During his years with Oakland, he teamed in the backfield with two outstanding pro quarterbacks, Kenny Stabler and former Heisman winner Jim Plunkett.

While Van Eeghen was reluctant to compare Parr to them, he did note that Stabler “couldn’t run, but he could dissect a defense, had a much better arm.”

Plunkett likewise had a strong arm, but he could not run well.

Of Parr’s passing, Van Eeghen said that “Tommy didn’t have a chance to show his arm,” because he ran the wishbone so effectively.

If Parr played today, Van Eeghen said, “he goes in the first round, no later than the second round.”

Dan Hurwitz, a 1982 graduate of Hopkins, just missed playing for Coach Parr, but he did go on to play at Colgate for four years. The starting center on the 1981 Hilltopper squad, Hurwitz considered transferring to Jonathan Law High School in Milford, Conn., where Tom Parr coached before he came to Hopkins and where he was a colleague of Hurwitz’s mother, a teacher.

“I almost transferred to Jonathan Law, just to have a chance to play for Coach Parr,” said Hurwitz from his office in New York, where he runs Raider Hill Advisors, a real estate investment firm.

Asked about Parr’s legacy as a coach, Hurwitz said that Parr “was equally concerned, if not more concerned, with having a positive impact on the players, as he was with winning.”

Hurwitz, who until recently was CEO of DDR, a Cleveland-based real estate firm, characterized football as “an all-encompassing life lesson.”

Although a recent Bloomberg Politics poll indicated that 50% of American parents don’t want their sons to play football, Hurwitz said that he had no reservations about letting his own son play.

And Hurwitz, a soft-spoken man with an imposing presence, still raved about the sport. “I use everything I learned on the football field every day in life. That includes being part of something bigger than yourself, relying on others, them relying on you, being a winner graciously, and losing graciously.”

As for the sport’s risks, Hurwitz said that football “has always been a physical game.” He added that at least now there is “a sensitivity to the issue, people getting proper treatment, paying attention to the issue of head trauma.”

When asked what made Parr special, Hurwitz kept using the word “impactful.” Hurwitz said that Parr “was impactful as a player, he was impactful as a coach, he was impactful as a teacher, and he was impactful as a mentor.”

Parr, who as a player at Colgate competed against some tough Yale squads in the 1970s, was joined on the sidelines in 1982, his rookie year as Hopkins head coach, by, among other assistants, Delaney Kiphuth, then 64 years old and Yale’s athletic director from 1954 to 1976.

During his tenure as Yale A.D., Kiphuth hired Carm Cozza, who became the winningest football coach in Yale history over his three decades of helming the program at Yale Bowl.

Like Tom Parr, Kiphuth was a legend in his time. He famously gave Calvin Hill a pep talk when Hill was considering quitting the Eli squad in the late 1960s. Hill would later win the NFL’s offensive rookie of the year award as well as a Super Bowl with the Dallas Cowboys.

One of the kindest yet fiercest of men, Kiphuth stood only five-foot-six or so and weighed about 150 pounds, but he was a starting lineman for Yale in 1940, not long after Larry Kelley and Clint Frank earned Heisman trophies as stars on the Elis.

That Tom Parr began his career at Hopkins with Delaney Kiphuth at his side means that Parr had a direct connection to Walter Camp, whom Kiphuth and his father, Bob, Yale’s fabled swim coach for four decades, knew and revered.

To give the modern reader a more complete understanding of Camp’s significance in the history of the game, consider what Knute Rockne, Notre Dame’s most celebrated coach, said after Yale decimated the Fighting Irish when Rockne was a graduate assistant in South Bend.

As Rockne put it, “The Notre Dame shift came from Yale, and Yale got it from God.”

That God of course was Walter Camp.

Besides influencing Rockne, a deity at Notre Dame, Camp trained and mentored other football icons like Howard Jones, who pioneered the football program at USC, turning the Trojans into a national powerhouse in the 1920s.

Camp’s most famous disciple was Amos Alonzo Stagg, who, among other innovations, conceived of the huddle, introduced the tackle dummy for practice, and devised numerous offensive tactics such as the lateral pass, the reverse play and the man in motion. He retired with 314 collegiate coaching victories, still one of the highest totals in the annals of the sport.

When asked whether he views himself as a disciple of Walter Camp, Parr, who in addition to coaching has served as athletic director at Hopkins for nearly three decades, said that “you’re blown away with the tradition.”

Parr, a former history teacher, noted that Camp was “captain of his house team at Hopkins” in 1872, just a few years after the very first football game played between Rutgers and Princeton, back when football more closely resembled soccer or rugby.

Parr, who ran the option out of a wishbone formation when he was at Colgate, used an “I” formation and a split backfield as coach at Hopkins. As he said over the phone, “we were run-oriented,” with an emphasis on running “off-tackle.” He pointed out that Hopkins sometimes competed against schools that were better and physically bigger than the Hilltoppers, teams like Brunswick. “You try to control the ball, to shorten the game.”

When asked why he is retiring at the age of 63, Tom Parr said that he is a “dinosaur,” a bit of a Luddite, who does not necessarily love the way technology has changed what it means to be an educator. He also has been “coaching in a lot of pain” for some time. He has Factor V Leiden’s Mutation, which makes him “susceptible to blood clots.”

As far as what he plans to do, Parr said, “For 51 years, I’ve played or coached from August through November. It will be nice to take a fall off.”

He would not rule out a return to coaching. And he said that he may want to go back to fund-raising as well.

Asked about his legacy, Parr said, “Hopefully, I’ve carried that tradition (of Walter Camp) on. You hope you’ve had a positive effect on people.”

He added, “You wanted to make it so kids liked to come to practice. You wanted to inspire kids so they didn’t want to let you down. “

Rocco DeMaio starred as a wide receiver and tight end on Parr’s first four squads. DeMaio has served on Parr’s staff for more than two decades, has been the head baseball and basketball coach at Hopkins over the years, and is currently the head golf coach at the school.

He played tight end and wide receiver at Trinity College in Hartford, Conn., before returning to Hopkins as a coach.

Now a candidate for athletic director at the school, a position Parr has long held and will be relinquishing on June 14, DeMaio said this of Parr’s impact on his life and career, “He was like a father figure, a second father figure for so many of the players.”

DeMaio, who refers to Coach Parr as Tom, spoke of the life lessons that Parr imparted to the students, such as the need for mental toughness. “To a 16 year old, it didn’t really sit with me,” but the messages at the end of practice, the motivational speeches at different points in the season, later began to resonate with DeMaio, particularly in his 23 years as an assistant to Parr.

“I appreciated it more and more as I got older,” said DeMaio.

After Parr would speak at the end of the year to the seniors, “which was always a moving experience,” DeMaio would get up there and tell them, “I’m the luckiest guy in the room. For you, it’s your first time (hearing Coach Parr), but for me this is my fifteenth time or my twentieth time.”

DeMaio, 47, still marveled at Parr’s stamina. DeMaio said that “after a long practice,” he would often “shake his head, looking at the energy” of his mentor.

DeMaio also confirmed Parr’s long-held commitment to player safety. Because Hopkins is a relatively small school with only 700 students, DeMaio said, “We’re still able to regulate how much hitting we do during the week.” And he said that Parr always stressed tackling with the shoulder, never leading with the head.

DeMaio added that, as an educator, he has learned “a lot about the brain. It’s made me think about it (football) deeply.”

He has a seven-year-old son. Like Dan Hurwitz, DeMaio said that he would let his son play football.

Sandy MacMullen has been the head lacrosse coach at Hopkins since 1979. During that time, he has also served as an assistant football coach. A lacrosse star at Yale, MacMullen was part of Parr’s initial brain trust at Hopkins and was a close friend of Delaney Kiphuth, after whom an award has been named for the best history student at the prep school.

MacMullen e-mailed me about Parr’s impact on the young men he has coached. A history teacher, who comes from a family of educators and athletes, MacMullen thinks of significant, historical figures in terms of a “ripple effect” over the generations. “Influential people are that largely because of the ripple effect they cause.  Small actions can create larger ones and bigger consequences,” he wrote.

In his e-mail, MacMullen did not emphasize Parr’s championships, which are well known. Rather, MacMullen wrote about Parr’s adages and life lessons. “From the simple ‘do your homework’ that was part of every single post-game talk to players, to ‘don’t make this moment the biggest one of your life’ before the final game for the seniors, to ‘success is a journey, not a destination,’ spoken often to all, Tom has given guidance for behavior that carries far beyond a football field.”

Barbara Riley, head of school, has overseen Hopkins for about 15 years. Like Parr, she too will be leaving soon, in her case at the end of the next academic year.

During her stewardship of the school, Riley has seen the lives of so many “hopeful youths” enhanced by Tom Parr. Needless to say, she was heavily involved in the decision to award the Hopkins Medal to Parr.

“Given to the person who has shown unprecedented loyalty, commitment and devotion to Hopkins School,” the Hopkins Medal, Riley said in a phone interview on April 30, has “seldom” been awarded to a member of the faculty and staff. It is usually reserved for alumni, trustees, or parents of students at Hopkins.

Asked about Tom Parr’s legacy, Riley spoke of “the intangible stuff that is so embedded in Hopkins’ culture,” intangibles such as a dedication to the scholar-athlete ideal and sportsmanship. That culture, she said, has filtered “through osmosis” into the lives not only of Parr’s players but also the lives of students who did not play for him and into the lives of many of the other coaches at the school.

Like Walter Camp, whose influence extended far beyond the football field to all the team sports at Yale and around the country, Parr became “the dean of athletic directors in the (Fairchester) conference and beyond in New England.”

Riley said that one can not measure Parr’s impact simply by numbers of titles and wins and yards. She said over the phone, as she did in a letter to the Hopkins community, that the numbers that truly matter are “the hundreds and hundreds of Hopkins boys, many of whom believe – know – that the most important and lasting part of their Hopkins experience came with learning from and playing for Coach Parr.”

Besides serving as head of school, Barbara Riley, like Sandy MacMullen, Delaney Kiphuth and Tom Parr, has taught history at Hopkins. She is steeped in the life and career of Walter Camp, perhaps the school’s most illustrious graduate.

When asked what Camp would say about Parr’s upcoming honor, Riley cited so many parallels between the two men: the “intelligence, order, strategy and sportsmanship” that both brought “to a game that can too often be driven by other, lesser qualities.”

She added that for “both Walter Camp and Tom Parr, integrity and fair play were their watchwords.”

Parr’s final season as Hopkins’ football coach was his worst in terms of the team’s record. At 1-7, the 2014 squad equaled the 1982 squad for fewest victories by a Parr-coached club.

The team still worked hard in practice, played clean football and competed every week.

Reflecting on Parr’s approach to coaching and the mental strength he cultivated in his Hopkins players, Andrew Levy, one of the leaders of that 1982 squad, said, “If you go out on a football field without confidence, you’re not only going to lose; it’s dangerous. He made us feel we were a lot better than we were…And then we still went out and got our butts kicked!”

With all the controversy surrounding football, particularly as it concerns long-term health problems from concussions, the sport may not have a future. Whether it does or does not, Tom Parr has always taught his players to play the game the right way. He has enriched the lives of hundreds of young men, and he deserves credit for restoring competitiveness to a football program that dates back to Walter Camp.

2015-04-30-1430414545-70589-Walter_Camp_at_National_Portrait_Gallery_IMG_4595.jpg

Parr, who long proclaimed that “the road to the championship runs through New Haven,” clearly belongs in the pantheon of New Haven coaching heroes.

No one should doubt that Walter Camp’s spirit, which at one time was missing from Hopkins, will haunt the campus in New Haven on June 14.

It will be like Odysseus returning to Ithaca.

The football gods will be happy.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

'Let's Go Home': The Power of Redemption

I watched CNN almost exclusively for the news about the first day of the Baltimore uprisings, knowing that the other channels would probably be worse. And on it came: the condemnation of the Mayor (who incidentally was black and female), suggesting how weak she was for holding back the police; the labeling of the young people in rebellion as “thugs”; the slightly veiled damnation of the black community for burning down its own neighborhood, with particular sympathy for the CVS store that was burned and looted.

I write not in defense of riots. They’re awful, destructive, acts of hopeless people who don’t think very much of their future. But I am writing to note that there were a lot more people out on the street at the height of the violence who were literally fighting with their neighbors and family members, telling them to “Go home” and “Stop burning down your own neighborhood!”

Slowly, by the second day, the cameras focused on some of these people: the mother who beat her child all the way home, and gave a brilliant interview of why she did it but also, what it’s like to live in Baltimore. CNN focused on the young men who were trying to calm the streets, including breaking up a fight between two boys who were apparently from different gangs.

“There are longstanding beefs amongst the people, before the riot occurred”, the newsman sympathetically explained. They interviewed a preacher who held his head up; a state senator who called for justice. They let us see some of parents, community workers and others who confronted the police and the rioters to control the crowds that day, and will do so tomorrow just as eagerly.

So despite the violence, which the Baltimore Police Department alone would not have been able to stop the first day because they were overwhelmed by the numbers of people on the rampage, and the widespread nature of the destruction, maybe it was a good idea that the mayor didn’t turn loose the cops to beat heads as was done in so many cities recently, and in days of yore?

When CNN and other media outlets tells the narrative in a way that ignores these acts of redemptive non-violence, (including the action by the mayor) it justifies more violence by the police forces, who always have the preponderance of force on their side, and the authority to use it. When the narrative unfolds that way, it blocks the ugly truth about the American dream: it just doesn’t apply to the residents in West Baltimore, and neighborhoods like it across the country.

On the Amy Goodman Pacifica news broadcast the morning after the riot, Rev. Jesse Jackson pointed out Baltimore has 18000 vacant homes, caused by the mortgage get-rich schemes that caused the Great Depression of 2008 and the loss of homes for thousands of residents. The unemployment rate is 30 percent amongst young blacks. There were 111 cases of police violence that led to court judgments or settlements between 2011 and 2014, alone. You just don’t get this picture when you allow pundits and leaders to get on television and call the rioters “thugs”… which simply justifies more violence, more oppression and more responses based on rage.

Lost in that kind of single-minded blame analysis is the evidence of privilege and power that are held by some, and the abject poverty and powerlessness of others, which is the story that must be told if America is to ever back away from the precipice of death and destruction. Lost is the lesson of the historic role that black people have always played in times like these, when ordinary people do extraordinary things to keep the peace, thus backing off the agents of terror and destruction just by their sheer will to get the job done.

The little people of Baltimore — the mothers, fathers, sisters and brothers — are the people who stopped a second night of terror from being unleashed on their neighborhoods, this time by the overwhelming superiority of force amassed by the police, locked and loaded for offense.

It is this homegrown leadership that was finally given the audience and appreciation it deserves by some news outlets on the second day. It was a message of hope that was beyond comprehension of some the young rioters, but that people made stick up on the wall just by their will power. These leaders now have a right to say, “We’re doing our share, America. What about you?”

It is from this positioning on the moral high ground that longstanding Movements for social justice have been born and perpetuated in America, with particular reference to the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 60s. Let us hope that the majority of the country will listen, and begins first to insist on curbing the indiscriminant power of the combined police forces in the country; and that racism and poverty begin to be alleviated by government created jobs, real school reform, and social services for the people like those in Baltimore.

Junius Williams is the author of the book, Unfinished Agenda, Urban Politics in the Era of Black Power (www.randomhouse.com) and the Director of the Abbott Leadership Institute, Rutgers University Newark

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Equip Your Little Explorers With GeoSafari Jr. Toys

GeoSafari Jr. Utility VehicleEducational Insights’ award-winning line of GeoSafari Jr. toys are
introductory science tools that allow children as young as three years
old to see, hear, and make big discoveries. New products like the
Science Utility Vehicle and the Jungle Crew Lab Set are tough enough to
withstand the hard work done by your little explorer. They’re also
perfect for making learning fun and engaging.

Obama Launches E-Book Initiative For Low-Income Students

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama announced Thursday that major book publishers will provide more than $250 million in free e-books to low-income students and that he is seeking commitments from local governments and schools nationwide to provide library cards to all students.

Obama announced the initiatives at a library in Washington’s economically depressed Anacostia neighborhood. The initiatives are tied to his ConnectEd program, a 2-year-old effort to boost educational outcomes by improving digital connectivity.

obama ebooks

“We’re going to provide millions of e-books online so that they’re available for young people who maybe don’t have as many books at home or don’t always have access to a full stock of reading materials,” Obama said during a virtual town hall sponsored by Discovery Education.

Obama told the students that how well they do in life is going to depend on whether they love reading and learning, and whether they know how to find information and use it.

The best way to do that in an Internet age, he said, is “making sure that you’re plugged in.”

obama ebooks

The offer of free e-books comes as low-income households still lag far behind others in computer ownership, but White House officials said libraries and schools in poor communities are increasing access to the Internet. Macmillan, Simon & Schuster and Penguin Random House are among publishers participating in the program.

Obama also appealed to library directors, local governments and school officials to work together to provide all students with a library card. The White House already has commitments from 30 cities and counties, ranging from Baltimore to San Francisco.

During a question-and-answer session with about 40 students in the room and others participating online, Obama declared his love for turning and marking up the pages of traditional books.

obama ebooks

But, he said, “the truth of the matter is we live in a digital age.” Obama said e-books are “easy to carry” and that making them available free of charge to people who don’t have a lot of books or who can’t afford to buy many “can even things out between poor kids and rich kids,” who can afford them.

The ConnectEd program aims to make broadband Internet access available to 99 percent of American students by 2018. Already, companies such as Apple have pledged to provide $100 million worth of devices to lower-income schools, said Jeff Zients, director of the White House National Economic Council.

Obama announced the new initiatives two days after he called on the public to do “some soul searching” in the wake of recurrent deaths of black men at the hands of police and riots that have shaken minority communities, most recently in Baltimore.

obama ebooks

“If we’re serious about living up to what our country is about, then we have to consider what we can do to provide opportunities in every community, not just when they’re on the front page, but every day,” Zients said.

A U.S. Census Bureau study of computer and Internet use issued in November found that in 2013 nearly 84 percent of households reported owning a computer. Computer ownership dropped to 62 percent among households with incomes below $25,000.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Watch Josh Sheehan Nail First Triple Backflip On A Motocross Bike

It’s been hailed as the world’s first triple backflip on a motocross bike.

But the stunt pulled off by Josh Sheehan of the Nitro Circus daredevil tour Tuesday doesn’t require any milestone label for anyone to see that it’s spectacular. And dangerous.

The trick required more than a year of preparation, according to the YouTube description.

Time well spent.

H/T Viral Viral Videos

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Today's Best Deals: Cheap Kindle Fires, $1 Spotify Premium, and More

Here are the best of today’s deals. Get every great deal every day on Kinja Deals, follow us on Facebook and Twitter to never miss a deal, join us on Kinja Gear to read about great products, and on Kinja Co-Op to help us find the best.

Read more…


Video: Stunning art made from simply carving one stick of wood

I don’t even know what to call this. Is it wood carving? Wood shaving? Art? Manipulating nature like no human has ever done before? Whatever it is, it’s beautiful. By carefully shaving the stick down, he can turn the wood into something so incredibly elaborate. It’s almost unbelievable. I mean, seriously, who knew a stick of wood hid so much art?

Read more…