Evernote Introduces Plus Subscription Tier, Cheaper Than Premium

penultimate-tiers-illustrationsEvernote is a handy app for those who love taking notes, storing receipts, or scanning documents into digital form and having it synced across multiple devices and platforms. However the free tier of Evernote might be a bit too restrictive for some users who rely on the app frequently, which is where the Premium subscription comes in.

That being said the Premium subscription comes in at $6 a month or $50 a year which some users might find a bit too expensive, this is why to encourage more subscribers, Evernote has recently announced the Plus subscription tier. This will fall in between the free and premium theirs and will basically be a happy middle of sorts, giving users enough functionality and features without being too restrictive, while keeping it relatively affordable.

The Plus subscription will be priced at $3 a month, but alternatively users can choose to pay $25 a year. It will allow 1GB of uploads per month and also the ability to convert emails into notes. It will also enable features such as passcode lock and offline notes on the phone or tablet. At the same time Evernote has announced that they have upgraded their Premium subscription.

This will give users unlimited uploads and will allow for larger individual note sizes. This should make all your documents easily accessible in one place without having to swap apps.

Evernote Introduces Plus Subscription Tier, Cheaper Than Premium , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.



Time Warner CEO Confident That Apple Will Launch Streaming TV Service

appletv-hbo-go-watchespnThere have been rumors that Apple could be thinking about launching a streaming TV service of their own. Whether or not that will happen remains to be seen, but apparently this is something that Time Warner’s CEO Jeffrey Bewkes believes will be happening. Speaking during the company’s recent earnings call, Bewkes expressed his confidence that an Apple streaming TV service is in the works.

According to Bewkes, “We think Apple is very forward-thinking about television. It’s no surprise to anyone that Apple would be interested in launching a TV product.” It is unclear if Bewkes is speaking from a speculative standpoint or if he has some insider knowledge. Given that the company has worked closely with Apple with the launch of HBO Now, having some idea of how Apple thinks and works would not be a stretch of the imagination.

It is possible that Apple themselves could have hinted the upcoming service. It was only a day ago that Apple’s CEO Tim Cook teased that they had an upcoming media product. It was unclear as to what Cook was referring to at that time, but it had been speculated that it could be the debut of Apple’s revamped music streaming service, but then again the launch of a streaming TV service fits the bill as well.

In any case our best bet to find out all we need to know is at WWDC 2015 which is the next major event Apple will be holding. It will take place in the middle of the year in June so do check back with us then for the details.

Time Warner CEO Confident That Apple Will Launch Streaming TV Service , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.



KU Fraternity Kicks 4 Members Out For Mocking Muslims

A fraternity at the University of Kansas has kicked out four members who admitted involvement in a video posted on social media that mocks Muslims.

Zeta Beta Tau chapter president Jason Finkelstein said Wednesday that the traditionally Jewish fraternity learned of the video April 10 and expelled the members the next day. He said it appears the clip was posted April 9 via the app Yeti.

In a written statement first released over the weekend to the Lawrence school’s student newspaper, the University Daily Kansan, and released Wednesday to The Associated Press, the fraternity said it takes a “strong stance against bigotry and intolerance in all forms.”

The student paper obtained the clip, which shows a man wrapped in a blanket with his face and head covered. He can be heard saying “Allahu akbar,” Arabic for “God is great” as others laugh.

The fraternity statement said the members admitted their involvement, leading the organization to invoke a “strict zero-tolerance policy” regarding racism, discrimination and prejudice.

“As an organization, we are ready and willing to take any further action necessary to ensure that those affected feel they are valued and appreciated in our community,” the statement said. “The brothers of Zeta Beta Tau Epsilon Mu Chapter regret the actions that took place and hope that we can use this as a stepping stone to start a positive conversation that promotes diversity.”

Laurence Bolotin, the executive director at the fraternity’s headquarters in Indianapolis, said in an email that the organization supported the “swift actions” of the chapter to expel the members.

Erinn Barcomb-Peterson, a university spokeswoman, said the matter was resolved because the chapter removed the students.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Prisoner In Van Said Freddie Gray Was ‘Banging Against The Walls' During Ride

A prisoner sharing a police transport van with Freddie Gray told investigators that he could hear Gray “banging against the walls” of the vehicle and believed that he “was intentionally trying to injure himself,” according to a police document obtained by The Washington Post.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Whole World Is Watching

Another man was dead, another man who could not challenge the police report on how he died. The official report in this case said North Charleston, S.C. Police Officer Michael T. Slager shot and killed Walter Scott, an unarmed black man, after Scott attempted to take the officer’s Taser and use it on him.

But a bystander’s video captured the deeply disturbing incident and showed that report to be a blatant fabrication. The whole world has now seen Slager firing eight times at Scott’s back after he began running away. Slager has been charged with murder, but his false story would have gone unchallenged had it not been for the video.

Video images have clearly become a powerful tool in documenting encounters between the public and police. The ACLU of California wants to make it more likely that even more individuals will use their phones to record those incidents, enabling the public to hold officers accountable when they cross the line.

That’s why the ACLU of California is proud to announce the release of Mobile Justice CA, a new smartphone app that allows users to effectively record law enforcement officers. Once the phone stops recording, the app quickly uploads a copy of the video to the local ACLU office. So it doesn’t matter what the officer or anyone does with the phone or to the recording on the phone because the video will already have been transmitted.

The ACLU wants law enforcement to know that the whole world could be watching, just as it was at the Democratic National Convention in 1968. Demonstrators there repeatedly chanted, “The whole world is watching,” as Chicago police brutally broke up their protest. The whole world could watch because there was video of police beating demonstrators with clubs and spraying them with gas.

Chicago became the moment when that chant was seared into the national consciousness. Since then it has become a rallying cry for demonstrators, including those protesting growing economic inequality at Occupy Wall Street in 2011. Students at the University of California at Davis, demonstrating in support of the Occupy movement, also took up the chant as police wantonly pepper sprayed a line of seated, peaceful demonstrators.

The chant is intended to shame and change those who would abuse their power with the threat that their actions will be exposed and judged. Of course, this isn’t always true. Though millions watched the scenes from outside the convention hall on television, Chicago police escaped any consequences for what has been called a “police riot.” But those television images left an indelible imprint on those who saw the footage.

The world has changed a lot since then. The pool of available images has been expanded exponentially beyond what television cameras capture to those recorded on cell phones and disseminated immediately and vividly on social media. The video of the UC Davis pepper spraying quickly went viral and sparked criticism and outrage around the globe. Thanks to the video, the University of California paid out nearly $1 million in damages to the students who were sprayed, and the officer lost his job.

Mobile Justice CA comes at a time when the public is demanding increased transparency and accountability. But law enforcement has been slow to respond. While transparency and accountability are not guaranteed, some departments have begun to equip their officers with body cameras. This reform promises to bring greater clarity to controversial encounters that often end with the only person who can dispute officers’ accounts dead.

But body cameras are only one tool, and some departments seem intent on using them in ways that don’t further accountability and transparency. Los Angeles police officers wearing body cameras were among those who fatally shot a man on skid row in March. The department has refused to release the video, saying it will release it only when it is part of a criminal or civil case. Some police groups have recommended legislation that would exempt all police body camera footage from public records requests — even footage of police shootings.

Likewise, departments that give officers wide discretion to decide when to record or fail to provide sanctions for not using the cameras frustrate the cameras’ purpose. Last year an Albuquerque, N.M. police officer shot Mary Hawkes, an unarmed 19-year-old, in the back and killed her. Though equipped with a body camera, the officer didn’t turn his camera on and record the shooting. He was later disciplined for failing to use his camera, but only after he had failed to turn it on five different times.

The ACLU’s Mobile Justice CA app puts the power to ensure transparency in the hands of the people. With so many people carrying cell phones with cameras, the whole world could be watching with just a touch of the phone’s screen.

And that simple touch could be what makes the difference in holding law enforcement accountable. Police body cams may prove to be effective tools in curbing police abuse. But bystanders’ cameras can be more powerful. Those images are not subject to police control, and like the Scott shooting, the footage they capture is immediately available for the whole world to see.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Orioles Broadcaster Gary Thorne Tells What It Was Like To Call The Empty Game

The Baltimore Orioles played a home game Wednesday against the Chicago White Sox in an empty stadium.

The unprecedented decision to play the game with no fans at Orioles Park at Camden Yards was made after Baltimore protests turned to rioting Monday following the death of Freddie Gray, 25, who suffered an unexplained fatal spinal injury this month in police custody.

What was it like to be in the empty ballpark? The Huffington Post spoke to one of the men who called the game, MASN broadcaster Gary Thorne, about the sights, sounds and emotions viewers couldn’t see, as well as the role baseball plays in times of crisis.

What a game. And for better or for worse, a historic one. When did you find out the game would be held, but it would be closed to the public? And what was your reaction?

I heard it [Tuesday] afternoon, when we had a call from our producer for the games on television saying they made a decision they were going to play a game, that no one was going to be allowed in the ballpark. And I was just kind of stunned, I guess was my first reaction. Trying to think, ‘What is this going to sound like? What is this going to look like for a game?’ And then wondering, ‘Has this ever happened before?’ Which it hadn’t. Those are my first reactions to it, just trying to wrap my mind around it.

orioles

Do you prepare any differently for a game like this — a sense that you have a bigger challenge to really convey what’s going on?

I guess I tried not to do that consciously, thinking about, ‘Alright, what am I going to do for this game?’ And I finally — and this was all yesterday thinking about it — it was like, ‘Well, wait a minute. It’s baseball.’ There are not going to be any people there, but you do games with 50,000-60,000. And you do games with 3,000 or 4,000 sometimes, but this time, there’s just nobody. It’s still a game. And so I didn’t want to over think that, so I just went to the ballpark to try and do a baseball game, and just let it flow, as you do with all games and you kind of feed off the game itself. And what was going to be missing was the fact that you couldn’t feed off fans. The fans oftentimes fill the void. If it’s a home team, and it’s a home run, and it’s a walkoff, there’s not much you’ve got to say. You just listen. That wasn’t going to be there today, for any circumstance. So you’re going to have to carry that with your voice that you might not have to do otherwise. But other than that, it was pretty much — it was a baseball game.

What did it feel like when you first arrived at Camden Yards?

It was quiet. That’s what it was. Going to the ballpark it was very quiet. There wasn’t much going on downtown. You didn’t have the usual gatherings around the restaurants and bars around the ballpark. And then when you went in, it was empty! You could hear everything. You could hear the grounds crew talking to each other while they were preparing the field, you could hear the players around the batting cage talking to each other. You could hear things you wouldn’t otherwise hear and there was nothing else to fill the void. There were times where it was just very quiet. And in that sense, that’s completely unusual. You just kind of sit and listen to the silence. And think you’re probably never going to have this chance to do this again at a major league ballpark.

What did that feel like? Eerie and cold, or more personal, even though there weren’t any people there other than the bare bones?

Well, it certainly was bare bones. There’s no question about that. But I actually felt that there was an intimacy at the ballpark with the few people who were there. Especially with the players before the game, in the clubhouse, during press conferences and out on the field while they were taking batting practice. There was a real intimacy because everybody understood that they were going to be involved in something that might never happen again — hopefully, doesn’t — and a unique situation, and this is the group of people who are going to be inside experiencing it.

Watching the game online, you could hear some of the players talking — we were hoping for some good dugout gossip. But any sounds that stood out to you, the crack of a bat or the pop of ball hitting a glove?

It was kind of funny before the game, the players and talking Buck Showalter, they were very aware that things they were going to say were going to be heard. So I think there was a good deal of shutdown in that regard, especially what you might hear between the bench and the umpire, between the bench and opponent’s players. There’s a lot of jibing that goes on and things like that. I don’t think there was much of that today. The players realized that was going to be heard and they didn’t want it to be heard, they certainly didn’t want anything they could be saying to umpires to be derogatory and would be heard. And what I did hear though at different times, was the chatter of the ballplayers to one another on their team. Encouraging them from the dugout and the guy at bat, talking to them, ‘Nice defensive play,’ and somebody hollering out. You don’t hear that in the course of a ball game. And today, that was continual. The guys were cheering for one another and urging each other on. You could hear that, and I thought that was pretty good. I thought that was interesting.

What did it feel like to hear that for the first time, despite the fact that you’ve covered ball games for years?

You know it’s going on, but you don’t expect to hear it, so you’re not looking for it. And then today, you know it’s going on and you’re looking for it. You’re listening for it because you know you’re probably going to be able to hear it. And it kind of just reminded me of, ‘It’s the kids’ part of the game. It’s going back to the little boys playing a man’s game. This is the stuff you did in Little League, they’re hollering the same stuff. ‘Let’s go! Let’s go!’ ‘Look for a good pitch!’ ‘Come on!’ ‘Don’t swing at that stuff!’ It’s the same stuff you did as a kid. And here they are doing it to one another as they do every day. And to hear that, kind of made you smile.

What was it like in the press box? Some writers on Twitter said you could hear each other chew, you and your co-announcer, Jim Palmer, joked during the broadcast about using your ‘masters voice’ versus your ‘free baseball for everyone voice.’

Well, we’re a level above … the writing press … so I know a lot of the guys who were tweeting, especially on the Chris Davis home run, they could hear the whole thing from my call upstairs, which they would never hear if there was a crowd in there. But they could hear it downstairs when we called it a home run. And next door was the White Sox broadcasters … and they were kidding me during the game, ‘Quiet down! We can hear you over here! Keep the noise down!’ kind of thing. Which, at a regular game, you’d never hear the other broadcasters, even though there’s a pretty good wall that separates it.

Did you and Jim ever have a moment where you realized you were part of history?

A little bit, maybe before the game. You know that it’s a unique situation, and we said that. But I think the moment for us though — because it was unexpected — at the very start of the game, there was a chant from Orioles fans coming from fans who were standing way outside the centerfield area on the street up against the fence. And you could hear them and see them. And we showed them. And we looked at one another on that one, when we realized that was going on. And that’s kind of special. They can’t get in, but they’re here at the game, they’re here at the park, and they’re outside cheering, ‘Let’s go O’s.’ And they did that for the whole game. They cheered different plays, they cheered players, they hollered out player’s names. I think that’s the moment I’ll remember about this game, are those fans that were outside doing that.

orioles

Do you think it was the right call to close the game to the public?

Short answer is yes. Safety first. It would’ve been nice to have the fans view the ballgame as a kind of uniting of the Orioles and the community and perhaps a chance to just relax, take a big breath and enjoy a ballgame. I understand that position. But, at the ballgame, had fans been in there and you would’ve attracted a large crowd, and if there were those who wanted to violate the law and cause trouble, it would’ve provided a gathering place. And I just don’t think that that risk could be taken and I think that was the right call for safety purposes.

Did you feel that tension and emotion on Saturday, when they asked fans to stay in the stadium as protests continued?

Well, of course being in the stadium, you really had no idea what was going on outside. We had a TV on behind us to look at some of the pictures. But you didn’t have a good feel for what was going on in the city even right outside the ballpark. You didn’t really have a good feel for how many people were there, what kind of problems there were, what was going on. And then when the announcement came on asking us not to leave, for an inning or so, that was a surprise. And without knowing, the anxiety there was, ‘Well, what the hell is going on? What don’t we know?’ And then when the game ended, there was no problem getting out, there were no problems leaving and going through town at the time. But that was anxious moment, largely again, because you just didn’t know.

After going through this game — and obviously the situation is far from over in Baltimore — what are your thoughts on sports, particularly baseball, being in the middle of these issues and conversations?

I think it’s inevitable. This isn’t the first time. Whether it was the breakout of World War II, the end of it, World War I, Vietnam, … Martin Luther King Jr.’s death, the Kennedys’ deaths, baseball — if it was going on — during the time of national turmoil, or sadness, or grief, it’s there. Baseball’s there. It’s played every day. It’s part of the fans, it’s part of their life, whether they follow closely or just on the periphery. It’s there every day. And so baseball can’t help but be part of the daily activities, even in times like these. And I think it’s not about baseball being politically involved, it’s about baseball being community-involved, and I think there’s a difference. Like what [Orioles player] Adam Jones was talking about today, that this is his city. He lives here, it’s a part of his community, he reaches out all the time, especially to kids, boys and girls clubs and schools. He feels this. These are people he sees who are some of them getting themselves in trouble out on the streets, and the city suffers. And so they feel it. The players feel it. The managers feel it. Certainly the owner, Peter Angelos and his family, feel it. And they’re part of it. So there are things that can be done through the baseball game and the individual players that are positives, to try and help the situation and community when it’s struggling like this. I think that’s the part that any sports team can play in a community and should.

Does this stand out as one of the most bizarre experiences in your career as a sports announcer?

Yeah, sure. When you’re doing a game like this in an empty ballpark. I think back, I was with the Mets in 9/11 when the baseball game was one of the first things that happened again in New York City as a public event. I was in the earthquake in San Francisco in ‘89 and that was a tumultuous event where the ballpark was involved … If the game’s there, it can’t avoid being a part of social events that are taking place around it. And it shouldn’t. It should be part of it. And should be whatever positive it can be for the community, for the nation, whatever the situation may be.

When baseball does return to Camden Yards, do you have any anticipation on what that game will mean for the city of Baltimore?

When the Orioles return home here, it will be one more piece of getting back to a daily routine that people are used to. I hate using — normalcy is the word that get used there, but normalcy I don’t think is an appropriate term because it’s not normal. There are things going on that are going to continue on the air, investigations regarding the underlying problems … the death of that young man in police custody, those things are still going to be going on. But it’s a return to life, on the same level as the curfew goes away, the restaurants are open, public areas are open after 10 o’clock, that sort of thing. An Orioles game will be one piece in that wall that starts putting it back together again so that you have some kind of life that looks like it did before.

orioles white sox

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Obama Administration Backs Away From Ending Federal Death Penalty

WASHINGTON — For a moment last year, it looked as if the Obama administration was moving toward a history-making end to the federal death penalty.

A botched execution in Oklahoma brought national attention to the issue, public opinion polls began to shift and President Obama, declaring that it was time to “ask ourselves some difficult and profound questions,” directed Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. to review capital punishment.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Vendor Shopping: More Than "What Do You Charge?"

Picture this: Dark night. Car pulls up to a corner. Window rolls down… a voice asks “How much?”

A scene from a movie? Something you would see in a shady neighborhood? Nope. Just someone getting married asking the cost of a vendor.

At least once a week, I receive an inquiry through my website from a prospective client that simply asks “what do you charge?” There is little to no other information, sometimes not even a wedding date. But here’s the thing: if I have an entire website giving you oodles of information to look at, why is it OK to just price shop with me and not give me any details? Answer: it’s not.

There are thousands of vendors available for your Big Day, and it can be a daunting task to even know where to start. Do you rely on ads in wedding magazines and websites? Editorial features where they list the vendors involved? Wedding shows? Word of mouth? OMG how can you even begin?! Well, you’re reading this blog, so that’s step one.

First and foremost: I beg you to stop looking for all of your vendors at the exact same time. It doesn’t matter how tight your deadline is, you cannot multi-shop here or you will pass out into a wedding planning coma.

Start with the big stuff you need: venue, dress, planner (um, hello?!) and then go down the list one by one: florist, music, photographer and so forth. If you’re unbelievably savvy, you’ll grab a planner first to help you with the longest to-do list of your life/to help keep you from going totally insane.

No matter how you window shop, whether it’s through mountains of magazines, social media or website after website, take your time and do your research. What do you like about the portfolios of the vendors you are looking at? Does their personality come through? Keep a running list of the vendors you want to interview (yes, interview) and once you reach your top 5, STOP.

Now that you have looked through their respective websites and researched everything you could, send an email or call the vendor to set up a time to meet in person. A meeting is a must so that you can see the person and find out if you will click on your wedding day. Chemistry with your wedding vendors is crucial! Your first bit of communication, however, is where many brides and grooms go wrong.

Never send an email that says “What do you charge?” or any other form of that question. Sure, you need to know the costs to see if you can even afford the vendor — I get it. But you aren’t picking up a pair of shoes here. Many times there isn’t a flat fee, and sometimes vendors don’t offer set packages. Understand that the price you will be charged will be determined by factors including your venue location, guest count and, oh yeah, exactly what you need.

For instance, if someone emails me with one of these inquiries, and is just price shopping, I can’t answer them. What they get in response is an invitation for a complimentary consultation at my office (or over the phone). Only then can their needs be really assessed. A good example: a 60 person guest count is going to require the service of myself and an assistant, whereas a 350 person guest count will require 2-4 people, in addition to myself. That right there changes the cost of hiring a planner.

The location of the wedding will also impact the pricing offered. Will the vendors need to travel all day? Is an 8 hour package not going to work because there is a 3 hour gap between the end of the ceremony and the beginning of the cocktail hour? Does everything need to be broken down at the end of the night, requiring your florist to come back at midnight and pack up? These questions, and more, will be asked during your consultation in order to determine the most accurate price.

But you just want an idea, right? You don’t know what anything costs, so you’re price shopping to find that out. The problem here is that what one person says is the “average” cost, is not what another person will say. It’s much more helpful if you figure out what you want to spend (or at least a range/your maximum spend) and go to the vendors with that number. They should be able to tell you if they can work within those budgetary parameters. However, when you send that email, do give as many details as possible including your wedding date, location and guest count. Do your research and tell the vendor exactly what services you are interested in.

Now, I know there are some brides and grooms reading this blog that are getting frustrated and thinking “I just want a number, I don’t have time for all of this.” Well, sorry… but not really sorry. This industry is super saturated. Besides the legitimate reasons that vendors have for not giving you numbers via email, there is another one you’re not thinking of: competition.

Who is the person emailing me asking for my prices? Are they even a future bride or groom? Is it possible that the person emailing me is another planner trying to figure out what they should charge? This happens all the time. I don’t know who is on the other end of the email, and I’m not about to reveal my pricing to some other planner who can just save that email and undercut me every chance they get. Besides, most planners (including myself) offer a “starting at” price right on the website.

Wedding planning is not an easy task and feeling overwhelmed is something that happens to almost every couple. Shopping for vendors, though, is not like picking out something in a retail store. With everyone offering something different, and every couple requiring different/customized services, you have to meet in order to figure out who the best person is for you. The only way to do that is with a phone call or email asking more than just “what do you charge?”

Don’t forget: You get to plan the Big Day once, and now you know how to start!

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Adidas's App Uses Spotify To DJ Your Run

Listening to music whilst running is great — if only to drown out the little voice in your head, swearing about how unfit you are, you useless lump — but matching the BPM of the song to your running cadence is nearly impossible.

Read more…



Airbnb gives Android tablet and iPad users a slick, new interface

2015-04-30 4 airbnb 3Airbnb decided that instead of simply scaling-up its mobile apps, it would completely design a new tablet interface from the ground up. The new apps boast a “cinematic” interface. The entire feel of the app is more like browsing through a thick, glossy travel magazine than searching through wordy hotel reviews. The new Airbnb apps for Android and iOS tablets … Continue reading