First Nighter: <em>Trash Cuisine</em> Scrutinizes Man's Inhumanity to Man

It’s been said that theater emanating from repressed societies is the most pungent. You certainly believe it’s the god’s honest truth at Trash Cuisine, which the Belarus Free Theatre — free only by some definitions — is presenting at La MaMa, after showing it for some time in many places (but Belarus), as a continuing collaboration between the company and the Public Theater.

After walking onto an empty space carrying low stools, the eight company members — four women and four men — introduce themselves and state their national origins. (Most of them are from Belarus but may not be residing there now.)

Then as they repeatedly rearrange the stools, they present a prelude choreographed by Bridget Fiske in which they mime almost every sort of torture and assassination imaginable. The cast members — serving at one time or another as persecutor and victim — mime beatings, waterboarding, hanging, beheading, electrocution. You name it, and short of pulling out fingernails and toenails, they get around to it.

Having established that they’re absorbed with man’s inhumanity to man, man’s inhumanity to woman, woman’s inhumanity to man and woman’s inhumanity to woman and, by their actions, implying this is the quintessential human condition, one of the members — individually they’re Victoria Biran, Karyl Kanstantsinau, Siarhei Kvachonak, Esther Mugambi, Stephanie Pan, Pave Radak-Haradnitski, Maryia Sazonava, Philippe Spall, Arkadiy Yushkin — explains he’s chef Pierre Noir and that what follows will be a survey of not necessarily palatable international recipes.

Food prepared and served, however, only occupies their concerns intermittently. One sequence has Chef Noir eating an ortolan whole, a gustatorial endeavor sometimes considered barbaric. He spares patrons the sight by devouring it with a napkin over his face.

What does occupy the performers’ time and efforts are representations of authenticated miscarriages of justice, often involving horrific exterminations. As written by Nicolai Khalezin and Natalia Kaliada and directed by Khalezin, it’s beside the point to describe the incidents they recount in order to declare the worst. (Additional contributions have been made by Stephanie Pan, Nastassia Shcherbak, Aleh Sidorchyk, Clive Stafford Smith and Philippe Spall.)

Let it be sufficient to say that depictions of the warring Hutus and Tutsis are thoroughly unsettling. The display of a woman tortured by watching her children slain, then cooked and given to her to ingest is further evidence of the chilling depths to which the Belarus Free Theatre is ready to go to make their pressing case. As a backdrop to the murders of the children, Chef Noir is seen upstage working over a skillet.

To supplement the dread, there are recitations of William Shakespeare speeches, among them Shylock’s Merchant of Venice demanding his pound of flesh in court and Claudius’s prayer in Hamlet for forgiveness he knows he neither deserves nor will receive.

Towards the beginning of the proceedings, two executioners blithely compare their policies and pay rates while around them others are methodically doing in the condemned. Later, one of the company demonstrates, as if she’s a variety show impersonator, the sounds killing methods make.

The 90-minute Trash Cuisine — which ends with a full-blown dance wherein the cast members assault one another — doesn’t precisely fit Antonin’s definition for the Theater of Cruelty. Yet, regarded from another perspective, it’s as close to the definition of theater depicting unbridled cruelty as a production is likely to get.

As a result, no one would ever make an argument for Trash Cuisine being easy to sit through. At the same time, watching it, as played by the determinedly somber company, has its compensation. Certainly, theatergoers always on the lookout for something they’ve never seen before are guaranteed to find that here. It’s as if they’re seeing Francisco Goya’s worst “Disasters of War” drawings spring to life.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Bernie Sanders Announces He Is Running For President In 2016

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) announced on Wednesday that he’ll run for president of the United States in 2016.

“I am running for president,” Sanders told The Associated Press. “People should not underestimate me… I’ve run outside of the two-party system, defeating Democrats and Republicans, taking on big-money candidates and, you know, I think the message that has resonated in Vermont is a message that can resonate all over this country.”

Sanders will make a more formal announcement about his presidential campaign on Thursday.

Sanders is the first official challenger for the Democratic nomination to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who announced her candidacy earlier this month.

Sanders, a self-described “democratic socialist,” has been hinting that he would seek the White House for nearly two years.

The senator, who has been in the upper chamber since 2007, previously served as Vermont’s at-large congressman and as mayor of Burlington. He caucuses with the Democratic Party in the Senate and is categorized as a Democrat for the purpose of committee assignments.

In an interview with The Huffington Post last year, Sanders said that he wouldn’t be dissuaded from entering the presidential race by the prospect of facing former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary.

“In terms of Hillary, I respect her. I’ve known her. I like her. So I’m not running to attack Hillary Clinton. I’m running to talk about the issues that impact the working class of this country and the middle class,” he said last year.

Sanders, who has also characterized himself as “an independent Democrat,” has expressed discomfort with the party, saying that it relies too heavily on “big-money interests” and doesn’t adequately distinguish itself from the Republicans. But he has noted the “dilemma” of running for president outside the traditional two-party structure and the challenges of building an independent grassroots movement to do so.

Late last year, he visited Iowa, which will host the first party caucuses in 2016, to test enthusiasm for his candidacy.

Sanders has argued that the country deserves a real debate about policy issues, suggesting that such a conversation won’t happen without a contested nomination process. “There’s so much to be discussed, Ed, and we’re not in this country about anointing anybody for a nomination,” Sanders told MSNBC’s Ed Schultz last year.

In the Senate, Sanders has focused on a range of issues, from reforming health care for veterans to addressing the threat posed by climate change. He has also been a strong advocate for a universal, single-payer health care plan nationwide, though the plan for such a system in his home state was recently dropped.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

4 Better Ways to Spend Your Tax Refund

Picture this: You wake up one morning and head outside to get the newspaper.

Sitting there on the stoop is a bag with your name on it. You open it and find a wad of cash — totaling $3,120!

Your mind starts to race as you think about how you’ll spend this money that’s fallen into your lap.

Perhaps you’ll pay off debt, pad your 401(k), or beef up that down payment fund for a new home. A blowout vacation sounds nice too — because, hey, how often do you get a windfall like this?

Or maybe you’re actually at a total loss for what to do, especially since, unless your name is Tony Soprano, this hypothetical scenario seems rather unlikely.

Well, we’ve got news for you: In the coming weeks you could be one of the many Americans receiving what the IRS has quoted as the average tax refund of — you guessed it — $3,120.

And it’s precisely why we thought it was high time to take a look at the common ways people make poor decisions when it comes to tax refunds — and the better strategies to consider should this bonanza hit your own bank account.

RELATED: The Jackpot Problem: A Wise Guide to Windfalls

A Little Tax Refund Psychology: How Our Minds Tend to Process Windfalls
Who would have guessed that getting a check from the IRS could elicit feelings of bliss akin to falling in love or landing a coveted promotion?

“We tend to have clear rules for our approach to our paycheck, which arrives on a predictable basis,” says financial psychologist Brad Klontz, Ph.D., coauthor of “Mind Over Money.” “But we treat a sudden cash infusion, like a tax refund, very differently.”

A big refund can make you feel like you’ve hit the jackpot, bringing about a passionate response. Your amygdala — the mind’s emotional hub — takes over the prefrontal cortex, or “thinking center” of the brain, which can cause you to act in a rash manner.

RELATED: 8 Sneaky Overspending Triggers That Can Sabotage Your Budget

Translation: No matter how diligent you usually are, once you have that check in hand, your prudent financial habits can easily get tossed out the window. Before you know it, you’ve booked an all-inclusive getaway to Fiji.

Luckily, there are some strategies that can help inoculate you against these ill effects.

For starters, “just being aware that we’re all prone to impulsive behavior around tax-refund time will activate your prefrontal cortex,” Klontz says. “You’re now in an analytical frame of mind, where you’re curious about understanding your emotional reactions — instead of being controlled by them.”

The next rule is to wait at least 24 hours between receiving your refund and spending it, giving you time to reflect on what move would best align with your long-term goals.

It’s also prudent to talk to someone — your spouse, a parent, a financial planner — about your spending plans. “Hearing yourself state your intentions out loud can give you the opportunity to cross-check your impulses and get feedback on how reasonable your idea really is,” Klontz says.

Finally, remind yourself that even though your refund might feel like “found” money, it isn’t. You earned it throughout the year, so you should manage it responsibly, just as you would the rest of your salary.

Think you’ve got it under control?

Check out the top four ways Americans plan to use their refunds this year, based on a survey by the National Retail Federation — and see how you stack up.

RELATED: 6 Ways to Kick-start More Mindful Money Decisions

Refund Move #1: 47 Percent Plan to Stash It Away
So What’s Wrong With That? Believe it or not, there’s an art to saving well. While it might be tempting to funnel 100 percent of your refund into a single savings account, the reality is that might not be the best approach.

A Better Strategy Assess which savings categories you most need to bulk up. “Write down and prioritize all your goals — but not necessarily chronologically,” says Cheryl Costa, CFP® and principal at Forteris Wealth Management in Boston. “What are you most behind on?”

In terms of urgency, starting an emergency fund should top your list, followed closely by retirement savings. Then, depending on your particulars, setting up a college fund or other focused effort, such as a home down payment.

Contributing to your accounts in this order means you’re likely saving smartly — and not tempted to, say, allocate everything to your vacation fund when you’re short on more pressing goals.

Another tip for save-happy refund receivers? Let loose a little. “The downside of being overly vigilant with savings is that you can sacrifice the joy of money by being too anxious about the future — and therefore unable to enjoy the present,” Klontz says.

Severe frugality can easily cross over into self-deprivation — and that’s no way to live.

“So whether it’s a massage or a nice dinner out, give yourself permission to splurge a little here and there,” Costa says. “At the end of the day, you’re still on the right track.”

RELATED: 60 Motivating Seconds With a CFP: The Beauty of the $20 (or Less!) Happy Splurge

Refund Move #2: 39 Percent Plan to Pay Off Debt
So What’s Wrong With That? There’s no doubt that eliminating debt is an admirable financial goal but, interestingly, there are a few pitfalls to beware of when earmarking your refund for this reason.

Not all debt is created equal — meaning it’s important to discern that you’re paying off accounts in the right order. And, in some cases, tackling certain savings goals should take priority over your quest to become debt-free.

A Better Strategy Before you dedicate your refund to debt repayment, make sure you can check a few other to-dos off your list, starting with your emergency fund.

“Having a safety net set aside is more important than paying off any loans, especially if you’re living paycheck to paycheck,” Costa says. “If something were to happen or you lost your job, you’d have nothing to fall back on — and potentially dig yourself even deeper into debt.”

Once you’ve squirreled away one month’s worth of take-home pay, you can tackle your savings and debt goals in tandem — splitting the remainder of your refund between your emergency fund and making a larger credit card or loan payment.

Already finished this to-do? The next step that can help you figure out a better way to spend your refund is to calculate your debt ratio, or the percentage of your income that’s allocated to debt payment.

If it’s below 36 percent, Costa suggests that upping your retirement contributions to the point of your employer match, if offered, may give you the best bang for your buck. However, if your ratio is dangerously close to or exceeds 36 percent, that means your credit could be in jeopardy, and eradicating debt should indeed be your primary objective.

Just remember to prioritize your loan payments according to which accounts carry the highest interest rates. Paying off a sky-high credit card balance at a 16 percent interest rate is usually much more urgent than dealing with a student loan at 4 percent.

RELATED: Pay, Spend, Pay: The Common Debt Mistake You Can’t Afford to Make

Refund Move #3: 25 Percent Plan to Cover Daily Expenses
So What’s Wrong With That? It’s a classic expression: Manipulating your W-4 in order to purposely plump up your refund is basically giving Uncle Sam an interest-free loan.

That’s not a smart game plan, even if you intend to save your tax-time windfall — but it’s especially worrisome if you truly needed that money throughout the year.

“If you use your tax refund to pay for necessities, then you are doing a disservice to yourself by withholding so much,” Costa says. “These dollars should be landing in your pocket every month instead of going to the government.”

A Better Strategy March over to your favorite HR person’s desk, and ask to fill out another W-4.

“The more exemptions you claim, the less money will be withheld in taxes,” explains Costa. “So if you claim only one or two exemptions, and you get a big refund each year, filling out a new W-4 and claiming more exemptions will result in an influx of money in your paycheck each pay period.”

While you may automatically default to either 0 or 1 exemption, it’s worth taking 10 minutes to read through the detailed form instructions to determine what makes sense for your specific circumstances.

For instance, someone who earns a moderate income but who carries an expensive mortgage in an area with high property taxes could potentially claim 8 to 12 personal exemptions.

“Many people think that their exemptions cannot exceed their family size, but that is most definitely not the case,” Costa adds.

The truth is, no matter how much of a pleasure rush you might get from a fat refund check, it actually points to a lack of money savvy.

“You could have been using that cash to slowly build an emergency fund, or work toward another goal — and gain a little interest on it in the meantime,” Costa says.

RELATED: 6 Tales of Tax-Time Blunders: ‘The Major Mistake I’ll Never Make Again’

Refund Move #4: 24 Percent Plan to Splurge
So What’s Wrong With That? After working your tail off all year, it’s understandable if you’d want to indulge a little — but the emphasis here needs to be on a little.

Going whole-hog by relinquishing your entire refund to buy plane tickets to Paris or a new iMac can be a bad move for your budget.

A Better Strategy Follow the 90/10 rule, in which you devote 90 percent of your tax refund toward financial goals, like maxing out a Roth IRA, and 10 percent for carefree spending.

“The 90/10 rule is a good one because it’s just another way to give yourself incentive to stick with your savings plan,” Costa says.

But what if you had your heart set on using your entire refund for a big-ticket purchase — like a fancy new kitchen — and 10 percent won’t cover it?

“Then the cold, hard fact is you can’t afford it,” Costa says. “You can try to convince yourself otherwise, but ultimately, it’s no different than charging up your credit card.”

If there’s something you really want or need, the (much!) smarter system is to allocate a certain portion of your monthly income to gradually save up for it.

Figure out how much the item will cost — after you subtract 10 percent of your refund — and divide that amount by 52. That number represents the sum you have to put aside each week if you want to reach your goal within a year’s time.

Once you’ve hit your target, feel free to go crazy with that Viking Range.

RELATED: Battle of the Sexes: How Men and Women Do Saving and Splurging Differently

This post originally appeared on LearnVest.

More From LearnVest
Magic Money: 5 True Tales of Unexpected Windfalls
Secrets of a Psychologist: How to Train Your Brain to Make Smarter Money Moves
11 Things You’re Embarrassed to Ask About Taxes

LearnVest is a program for your money. Read our stories, use our tools and talk to a Planner about getting a financial plan designed for you.

LearnVest Planning Services is a registered investment adviser and subsidiary of LearnVest, Inc., that provides financial plans for its clients. Information shown is for illustrative purposes only and is not intended as investment, legal or tax planning advice. Please consult a financial adviser, attorney or tax specialist for advice specific to your financial situation. Unless specifically identified as such, the individuals interviewed or quoted in this piece are neither clients, employees nor affiliates of LearnVest Planning Services, and the views expressed are their own. LearnVest Planning Services and any third parties listed, linked to or otherwise appearing in this message are separate and unaffiliated and are not responsible for each other’s products, services or policies.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Missouri Owes Its Odd State Shape To Just One Guy

The shape of Missouri mostly makes sense: It’s bounded by straight lines and river routes, except for one deviation, where suddenly the state’s shape juts out randomly. It’s called Missouri’s bootheel — and it owes its creation to just one guy.

Read more…


These Maps Plot the Most Interesting Places and the Paths Between Them

For the past five years data artist Eric Fischer’s been working on something called the Geotaggers’ World Atlas, a project which hopes to discover the world’s most interesting places by examining beautiful Flickr photos. As it turns out, the maps showing the routes between them are just as beautiful.

Read more…



Everything We Learned About Windows 10 Today

Every year, Microsoft does this thing called Build. It’s a wonderful nerd party where crowds erupt into applause over new debugging tools and coding software. It’s kind of the best.

Read more…



Head transplant doctor’s MGS5 similarity spawns web of conspiracy

The Internet knows no limits to its imagination and the drama it stirs up, and now the doctor best known for his head transplant plans has been swept up into it all. The hoopla started about a week ago when an innocent post was made on NeoGAF comparing a picture of Dr. Sergio Canavero with a doctor character from Metal … Continue reading

Land Rover fails in its bid to block Chinese copycats

China is famous for many things, but a deeply-held respect for the concept of intellectual property isn’t one of them. It’s a problem that Land Rover has just run into head-first after its claims that the Land Wind X7 was a shameless copy of its Rang…

Math explains why beating 'Tetris' is basically impossible

You’re never going to beat Tetris. Sorry. You might be asking why I’m so pessimistic and even though that’s perfectly natural, PBS’ Game/Show will back me up here. While the seven multicolored falling bricks (officially called “tetrominoes”) all fit …

Love in Action: Robert Kennedy Jr.

This past week marked the 45 annual celebration of Earth Day. Robert Kennedy Jr., featured in this episode of “Love in Action” and nephew to the iconic president that helped create Earth Day, stands at the forefront of the environmental movement on a daily basis, fighting to make the world’s waterways safe and pollution free.

2015-04-28-1430233890-7019200-Love_in_action_RK.jpg

Inspiring us to take action in this NEWSWIRE.FM production set in the Deepak Homebase in the ABC Home mezzanine level studio, Mr. Kennedy shares his extensive knowledge of environmental and legal history to paint a detailed picture of our current environmental crisis. Kennedy is currently the chief prosecuting attorney for RiverKeeper and the Senior Attorney for the Waterkeepers Alliance. He works continually to support a mission that clean water is an essential aspect to human existence.

In this interview with Deepak Chopra, Kennedy reminisces about a moment at the age of 9 while he spent an afternoon at the White House. He was visiting his uncle, JFK, in the oval office discussing issues of pollution. Even at this young age, it was clear that his trajectory was set. Today he makes us all realize the power we have to help protect the earth for our future generations.

“The air, the water, the wildlife, the beaches…they belong to the public,” says Robert Kennedy Jr. and he works to protect the “shared resources of our society.”

As a leader in environmental causes, particularly with his work at River Keepers and Water Keepers, he champions political causes and defends the idea that “the fight for clean water is a fight for one of the most basic and essential human rights.”

Robert Kennedy Jr. follows his passion for protecting the environment from polluters, whether in the form of dirty politicians or toxic remains from nuclear power plants, Kennedy consistently emphasizes the importance of everyone’s involvement with making our water and our environment clean and safe. His simple idea matched with his intelligence and creative approach “as the voice for the world’s waters,” allows all viewers to join his movement.

Deepak congratulated Kennedy on being an “environmental hero for the planet enforcing the law as it should be, and restoring our rights and the rights of nature.” This special episode of “Love in Action” connects audiences to the current environmental reality and allows viewers a chance to step into an action role, helping to keep our water and air clean. These are causes that are dear to Robert Kennedy Jr., but also, to all of us.

This is a blog series produced in partnership with “Love in Action,” a video series with Deepak Chopra and NEWSWIRE.FM. Click here to watch the full interview.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.