'Real Housewives Of New York' Star Bethenny Frankel Is Dating Again, But Not Online

Bethenny Frankel may be single, but you won’t be seeing the “Real Housewives of New York” star on Tinder anytime soon.

“I’m not interested in … online dating right now,” she told HuffPost Live’s Caitlyn Becker on Wednesday. “It’s something that’s not appealing to me. I meet a lot of people and maybe I would meet someone through someone else, or not, but who knows? You never know.”

The Skinnygirl mogul said she’s actively dating but “taking it slow.”

“I talk about this in my book [I Suck at Relationships So You Don’t Have To] that being a mom is a great way to set a pace — and being a businesswoman,” she explained. “I’m with my daughter, and that time that I have left over from when I’m not working and with my daughter, that’s the time I could go on a date, and that’s not that much time, so it makes it more precious and more paced. If you don’t have a job or you don’t have kids, you have all the time in the world to focus on some guy, and it’s good to have your own life and independence [so you’re] not always focusing on some guy.”

Frankel is still finalizing her divorce from Jason Hoppy, with whom she split in December of 2012 after two and a half years of marriage. The contentious process has led the reality star to swear off marriage in the future.

“I will never get legally married again. I will never, ever be legally married again,” she told Andy Cohen in a recent “Watch What Happens Live” interview. “Marriage is the ‘Hotel California’: You can check out anytime, but you can never leave.”

Watch more from Bethenny Frankel’s conversation with HuffPost Live here.

Sign up here for Live Today, HuffPost Live’s morning email that will let you know the newsmakers, celebrities and politicians joining us that day and give you the best clips from the day before!

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

I Did Not 'Red-Shirt' My Kindergartner

In my state, a child can attend kindergarten if he reaches the age of 5 before July 31st. My son’s birthday is July 17th, and guess what? I did not send him to kindergarten this past Fall. Would he have been ready? Sure! Many parents make the case that their kid is ready because they know their 1, 2, 3’s and A, B, C’s. To me, kindergarten readiness means looking at so much more and well into the future too.

While my son would have been ready, I decided to wait. Why? I feel I am giving him one more year of being a kid by graduating when he is actually 18. We have to work for the rest of our lives once we are done with high school or college. What’s the rush to have him graduate from either of those venues one year earlier? I’m giving him another year of maturity under his belt before he has to make some very adult decisions about his life. We now know that the brain doesn’t fully develop until 25-30 years of age, and I’m giving him one more year for cognitive development and a little more emotional maturity, which affects self image and judgment. (Let’s hope he uses that judgment at that frat party he will someday attend…).

I don’t see how this can be construed negatively. Yet, I was asked several times this past summer if my son was starting kindergarten in the Fall and when I replied that he was going next year, I heard responses of, “Red shirting, huh?” or, “Wow! He’s going to start late?” (This last comment was usually said with mock surprise and followed with, “My little Timmy is just SOOO ready!” or, “We are just done with paying daycare.”)

No, I am not “Red Shirting” my son. In fact, the concept of sports did not even enter into this decision. And no, I’m not starting him “late” and please don’t insinuate your child is smarter simply because he is going to kindergarten first. I mean seriously… it’s kindergarten, not Yale.

I have heard parents of junior high and high school students say, “I totally regret starting him early,” or “I wish I would have waited.” But you know what? I have never once heard a parent say, “I wish I would have started my child a year earlier.” Not once. Are there kids that started younger who do just fine? Absolutely. When to start a child in school is an individual choice and it’s not the right choice for everyone for more reasons than intelligence alone. So the demeaning comments and insinuations need to stop.

It just did not seem like a great idea for me to push any of my kids through their educational experience quickly and have them graduate at the age of 17. Again, what is the rush? As I watch them play now, I’m reminded of the song by Billy Dean, “Let Them Be Little,” and I am comforted to know that their lives will turn out just fine even though I didn’t start them in kindergarten at the age of 5.

A version of this post originally ran on It’s Really 10 Months. You can also find Kim on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

How Long Will It Take the Average American to Pay Off Credit Card Debt?

If you’re dealing with high credit card debt, you’re not alone. Like, really not alone — in fact, according to the Federal Reserve, consumer credit debt in the U.S. has topped $3.34 trillion dollars as of February 2015, which means there is slightly over $10,470 dollars of debt for every person in the country.

With numbers like that, it’s no wonder that many people are struggling with their credit card debt, especially when you consider that the average card holder has about $15,000 in credit card debt, with an average annual percentage rate of 17 percent.

With that in mind, it makes a lot of sense to focus on strategies to get that debt paid off quickly.

Paying the Minimum Can Double Your Debt

Answer this question honestly — do you pay extra on your credit card bills, or do you stick to minimum payments every month? If you’re like most people, it’s probably the minimum. While making minimum payments may help you keep your credit score from tanking, doing so costs you more in the long run. If you only make minimum payments, the amount of time it takes for you to pay off your bill increases at an exponential rate.

For instance, if your credit card debt is $15,000, your interest rate is approximately 17 percent, and you make a minimum payment of $250.00/month: It will take you 135 months to pay off that card, or a little over 11 years.

During that time, you’ll end up paying over $18,000 in interest, over and above the $15,000 principal.

Now you can see why getting those cards paid off sooner rather than later make a lot of sense.

Strategy 1: Paying Off a Little Extra Every Month

The most straightforward method to getting out of debt is to simply pay more than the minimum due, every month. This method is best when you have a single, consolidated debt.

Paying extra is a great way to go because it helps your credit rating, as credit reporting agencies look at things like early payment and over-payment to be a good indicator of credit worthiness. It also dramatically shortens your timeline to pay off your debt because the extra payment goes straight to the principal.

For example, sticking the with example of $15,000 in credit card debt, with an annual interest rate of 17 percent: As seen above — if you pay the $250 minimum, you’ll be paying for 135 months, and end up paying over $18,000 in interest alone.

However, if you pay $400/month on the same card, it will only 54 months, and you end up paying just $6,545 in interest.

Now granted, an extra $150/month isn’t a trivial amount. But if you can find a way to do it, it not only cuts your time to repay the credit by more than half (less than 5 years, instead of over 11 years), it also reduces your interest portion by about two-thirds, resulting in a total repayment of around $21,545, instead of $33,715. That’s over $12,000 in your pocket.

Why is this? Because, by law, minimum credit card payments are defined as that month’s portion of the annual interest due, plus 1 percent of the principal. You read that right — out of your monthly minimum payment, only 1 percent goes to principal. If you pay extra, all of the extra money paid goes straight to the principal.

Strategy 2: Divide and Conquer

If you’re like most people, however, you have more than one card — in fact, the average American has 3.7 credit cards. And all these cards typically have different interest rates and balances.

Let’s say, for this example, that you have several credit cards, each with a different balance and interest rate. To pay them off, you could pay the minimum amount on each, but we’ve seen how that prolongs your repayment plan and increases your total bill over time.

Another strategy is to pay more than the minimums on each card, which is a good strategy and it can dramatically decrease your time to pay off your debt and the payoff amount.

But an even better strategy is to focus your extra payments on the cards with the highest interest rates. With this strategy, you either pay the minimums (or slight more) on three of the four cards, and pay substantially more on the card with the highest interest rate. This has the double benefit of reducing your payment timeline and interest payments, and once the card is paid off you can take the money you were applying to that card and apply it to the next card on the list, which will result in paying that card off even faster, and so on.

If you qualify for a balance transfer credit card, you can also transfer a high-interest credit card debt to a card that offers 0% intro APRs, so you have a year or more to pay down the debt without interest. If you can’t qualify for a balance transfer card, look at repairing your credit to help you qualify.

Strategy 3: Consolidating Your Debt/Refinancing

A final strategy to mention is the option of using a debt consolidation loan, or refinancing your debt. To be honest, while this is an option, it needs to be treated very carefully and with an abundance of caution. Debt consolidation does not pay off your debt — it simply shifts it. Many debt consolidation loans extend your loan period out for a longer time, so that the payments seem lower. However, the loan comes with an even higher interest rate, and you end up paying more over time.

So while this is a strategy, make absolutely sure that you understand all of the fine print before even considering it. And even after you’ve considered it, you still probably shouldn’t do it.

Choosing the Best Strategy for You

Credit is a tool that, when used responsibly, can help you expand your financial potential and achieve financial stability. But take the time to choose a strategy that best works for you. Likewise, it’s important to avoid overextending yourself financially and stick to a realistic budget for expenses and credit repayment plans. After all, the best way to manage your debt is to keep it to a minimum in the first place.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

How These 'High-Power' Moms Combat Their Mother's Guilt

Krista Carothers, Jennifer Berson and Marissa Klein Kay join HuffPost Live to explain how they combat their mother’s guilt.

Watch the video here.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

7 Tricks From Brian Grazer About How to Reach Your Goals

It’s always exciting researching stories of success, because every story hides new solutions. I remember having to deal with the most annoying thing in my life when I was 18 — being alone. I didn’t have any other choice than asking for interviews from people who were appealing to my blog. (At the time I had around 200 reads… of course I was the one who created 150 page downloads from it). I had to see that there were people achieving their dreams, because if they could do it, why wouldn’t I be able to do it too? I had to see all the mistakes they committed to can learn from it. Later I needed more help; I had to see that nothing is impossible and that anything can work in big as well. I will never forget the moment when I first came across Oprah. It was a rainy afternoon in the Netherlands when I accidentally switched on the TV and she was there. I started to watch it. I remember, when the episode of the day ended, I run up the stars, grabbed my laptop and brought it down to the living room with me. I started to search and look for more because what I got just wasn’t enough for me.

2015-04-28-1430207797-9025418-dd3c670549f4a5725a528c679afb0938.jpg

I watched through the interview Oprah made with Brian Grazer so many times, because the intrepidity that permeated his life was incredibly inspiring for me. Brian Grazer is one of the most well-known movie makers of the world with an unbelievable amount of awards and admissions in his hands. (For example he got nominated to the Emmy Awards 133 times). The Imagine Entertainment what he created with Ron Howard brought over 13 billion dollars as an income. People like him, who have such a great amount of success for that long, deserve to be paid attention to. I collected some of the most useful tips from the interview — maybe it will help for you too.

1. Believe in your goal religiously!

Are you capable to believe so much in something that not even a thousand “nos” takes your passion away? Brian was rejected and laughed at by over a 1000 people through seven years after pitching his movie, Splash. And they didn’t just laugh at him. They said he was insane, they didn’t understand how can somebody has such an idea. As he couldn’t succeed for years, he decided to change on the way he was presenting — he ended up having great success.

2. Turn your goals into habits!

It’s worth trying, at least for a couple of weeks, making a quota for you about your goals each week. Talking about Brian, he met and talked with a certain amount of people each week. If he didn’t do it, he felt that he failed doing his task and his whole week was useless. He used the stories to create his movies or sometimes just to simply calm his curiosity.

3. Be open for the people!

Imagine what would happen if instead of having uncomfortable and forced chats you would be honestly interested about the other person’s life? Imagine if you would want to know all the difficulties he is facing each day, how he is getting over them, what habits he might have or what it is that makes him happy. You can learn much more from other people’s lives than what you would ever think, because they can change the way you look at certain things.

4. Find a”pulling power”!

Find something in your life that can give you magical powers, because sometimes that’s the only thing we need. A personal example: As a kid, I always got told that I am special and I am going to achieve big things. Brian Grazer’s grandmother was telling him the same thing over and over again. If you are able to find something in your life that is strong enough to keep you having faith, you will win.


5. Don’t take anything for granted!

You can never know for how long the situation is going to take that you are in at the moment — this is true for good and bad. If you can look on life from this perspective you will be able to stay opened and friendly with the people around you, because you won’t put yourself over them.

This is the other very important thing: Everybody is equal and you are not supposed to ever make anybody feel that he/she is worth less than you. If you are able to look at everyone with love, the butterfly effect will start to work, and you will be making a difference.

2015-04-28-1430207897-6195928-Kpernyfot201504289.58.57.png


6. Make a Decision!

In most of the cases the thing giving you opportunities is not going to be your talent or your knowledge — but your attitude. Brian came from a little city and started with handing newspapers out — but not in the usual way. He said firmly at the reception that he is just giving the newspaper into the hands of the consignee, independently if it’s the director itself or anyone else. Because of the attitude he had nobody saying no for him — and this led him to get to know everyone in the business really quickly, even if he wasn’t related to anyone famous. He learned new things day by day and took in everything about the film industry.

“Everybody could put a pencil down to an empty page” — and with this sentence, said by one of the directors at Warner, everything began. He didn’t have anything just ideas — but for a character like him it was more than enough.

7. Know that you have something that nobody else has!

I know how it feels when you are trying to feel yourself good in a group where you are unable to comment on any of the topics coming up or you feel that you don’t belong there. What if you would just calm down and just accept that you have something in you that nobody else has? From that moment on, when you are able to listen to the other’s conversations with being opened, curious about their lives, you won’t have any problems. People like to talk about themselves — and if you are able to make them talk — you already have your superpower.

Have something to add to this story?
E-mail me: oravecz.nora@gmail.com
instagram.com/oravecznoraofficial

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Roseanne Barr Is Going Blind. Here's What You Should Know

In an interview last week with The Daily Beast, actress Roseanne Barr revealed that she is slowly going blind.

Barr, 62, hasn’t lost her vision yet, but said she suffers from two eye conditions: Macular degeneration and glaucoma. Michigan ophthalmologist Steven A. Shanbom, MD, speaking generally because he has not treated Barr, told CNN why that combination is difficult: “Macular degeneration takes away her central vision, and glaucoma is taking away her peripheral vision,” he explained.

Barr has age-related macular degeneration, which is a leading cause of vision loss in people over 50, according to the National Eye Institute. It mostly affects the retina, or the central vision that focuses on objects ahead of us. Glaucoma, on the other hand, includes a number of disorders that affect the eye’s optic nerve, and is usually caused by pressure in the eyes and fluid buildup.

Barr told The Daily Beast that her vision is starting to narrow:

My vision is closing in now. It’s something weird. But there are other weird things. That one’s harsh, ’cause I read a lot, and then I thought, ‘Well, I guess I could hire somebody to read for me and read to me.’ But I like words and I like looking. You do what you have to do. I just try and enjoy vision as much as possible — y’know, living it up. My dad had it, too.

Vision loss, especially in people with a family history, is in many cases inevitable as we age. But you can take preventive measures. Dr. Rachel Bishop of the National Eye Institute told The Huffington Post to avoid smoking and remember to wear sunglasses.

“Smoking seems to affect circulation,” she explained, adding that circulation diminishes as we age. As for sunglasses, they help prevent sun damage, which accumulates with age just as it does on your skin. “Over time these damages accumulate and the body can’t compensate after a certain point. You [then] see damage to the surface structures and the deep structures [of the eye], like your retina,” she said.

Getting enough exercise can help, according to CNN, as can eating foods rich in eye-protective antioxidants, vitamins and minerals. Those include lutein- and zeathan-rich green vegetables, vitamin E-packed almonds and citrus, and also berries, which are high in Vitamin C. And don’t forget about your regular eye exams!

“Without that eye exam we can’t identify a problem and treat it,” Bishop said. “So much of blindness and vision loss is preventable, but the key is early detection. I have a number of patients with severe vision loss because they had glaucoma that they didn’t get treated sooner.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Tuesday Night Choreplay — What Really Happens When Men Lean Into Their Housework

Research shows that when men do their share of chores, their partners are happier and less depressed, conflicts are fewer and divorce rates are lower… Couples who share chores equally have more sex… Sheryl [Sandberg], has advised men that if they want to do something nice for their partners, instead of buying flowers, they should do laundry. A man who heard this was asked by his wife one night to do a load of laundry. He picked up the basket and asked hopefully, “Is this Lean In laundry?” Choreplay is real.

The New York Times, March 5, 2015.

Honey! You’re home! And you look like you’ve had a long day. What do you say we turn down the lights and share a little intimate time, just you and me and this Miele S-2000 canister vacuum? Who needs music when we can set the mood to the sound of a thousand hairs being sucked into a dust bag? Before we were married, I didn’t know it was possible for a woman to leave a literal carpet of hair on the bathroom floor. Now, every day I can’t resist the raw temptation to pre-sweep and power-suck and lovingly finger-pluck the long dark strands from our contrasting, creamy-colored tile until the futility of this task washes over me and I submit wholly to the constant, Pantene-smooth reminder of your presence. Since you walked through the door I’m sure you shed half a wig’s worth. Let’s get this party started.

Now that we’ve set the proper ambiance, I want to take you into the kitchen and bend you over the dishwasher as I empty it. And then fill it. And then empty it. And then fill it. And then empty it. And then fill it allllll the way up again. Should I also put away that pile of tupperware that has been sitting on the counter for over a month? I don’t know about you, but I love how those soup and salad containers stack one inside the other. The fit is always just right.

Would it get your juices flowing if I hand washed all of your panties in the sink, ringing out each pair ever-so-slowly before stretching them across the curved lines of your drying rack? And please don’t make me beg you. OK, make me beg you. Pleeeease can I collect every sock you own into my warm and capable arms, so I can coax them into the washing machine for a delicate, soapy massage? After I take them for a tumble in the dryer and they’re nice and hot, I’ll probe deep inside the machine and snatch that last naughty sock that always seems to be hiding.

Next, I want you to join me in the shower so I can spray Scrubbing Bubbles everywhere, scouring the tile and glass until we can’t see each other through all the sweat and foam. After I towel you off with a warm, dry sock (did I forget to do towels?), I will lay you down on the couch before I illuminate the room with a dozen Glade candles. I’ve read their fresh linen scent lasts at least 20 percent longer than Febreze. Now relax as I reorganize our library into a complex, coded system that positions Rosemary’s Baby between Dante’s Inferno and The Joy of Sex, and your childhood copy of The Giving Tree beneath a giant pile of unopened junk mail. By the way, did you know that you married the Ron Jeremy of dusting bookshelves? I’m going to let you interpret exactly what that means.

When the shelves have been satisfied, I will crouch down next to you in the living room. Shhhh, don’t speak. Concentrate on the soothing hum of my voice and the sensation of my hot breath as I whisper tomorrow’s grocery list in your ear. Maybe I’ll buy that almond butter you like even though it’s inexplicably $14 dollars and, I’m pretty sure, made of sawdust. What if I throw caution to the wind and just go for the honey smoked turkey instead of the maple glazed, and then totally indulge by redeeming not one, but two coupons for “any brand of yogurt sold at Whole Foods”? I’ll be sure to get the ones that are free of hormones — we clearly have enough of those raging inside of us already.

As you allow the sweet torture of my mystery shopping trip to wash over you, I will revive yesterday’s Chinese leftovers for a meal that will really make you salivate. Do you want your moo shu shrimp warmed slowly and lovingly in the oven, or given to you quick and dirty from the microwave? You can have it any way you want.

Hold on, baby, that’s not all I’ve got. Pour yourself a glass of wine as I sew on all your missing buttons nice and tightly and water the plants until they scream for mercy. Watch me plow through your taxes and plunge into the dog food bag to feed little Sparky.

Just when you think I couldn’t get you any more riled up, I’m going take out the trash. Watch as I ruthlessly recycle a year’s worth of Dwell magazine and pile up our plastics until their designated container is ready to burst. Then, I’m going to run the composter until you pant, breathlessly, “You’re making me so turned on!” Though this confession will actually been directed at a rerun of “Charlie Rose,” I’ll know your heart (and loins) are in the right place.

Finally, I will slink into the bedroom, lay out some lingerie, lean into our freshly made bed and we will totally have sex tomorrow.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

NC Senator Michael Lee Might Be a Debt Collection Idiot

North Carolina is trying to pass legislation which will roll back protections for consumers who have bad debt purchased by debt buyers.

Senator Michael Lee from Wilmington, North Carolina is the sponsor of S.B. 511, titled Proof Required for Debt/Fees, which efforts to rollback the requirement the bad debt buyer must have detailed information about where and when the debt originated and details on how the fees were calculated, before suing the consumer.

I can only assume Senator Lee is just an ill informed legislator. Because either he doesn’t care about to baseless claims his constituents face from bad debt buyers or he is becoming a cheerleader for debt collectors.

The News & Observer says Lee believes rolling back the 2009 consumer protections, which “passed by a unanimous vote in the Senate because, on a bipartisan basis, people were troubled on behalf of taxpayers about what was happening in the courts,” is a smart thing to do.

Lee’s argument about making it easier for collectors to sue is that consumers can challenge the suit in court and demand proof. But we already know people are afraid and don’t challenge these suits so Lee’s position is effectively to retard common sense protections already in place for consumers.

In my opinion, this legislation is ill-advised, ill-conceived, and unwarranted. Besides, what we are really talking about here is just making sure the bad debt buyer has the information on hand to prove this is a valid debt. The only logical reason to remove this requirement would be so the bad debt buyer is not required to have this information on hand.

And to make this situation even more ridiculous, Lee is listed as an attorney on his North Carolina General Assembly page.

Screen Shot 2015-04-29 at 5.39.39 PM

But maybe here is another clue what might be driving this slap in the face of North Carolina citizens. The website for Michael Lee, the attorney, says “The firm focuses on…debt acquisition.”

Lee’s idiotic sponsored bill wants to make a charge-off statement proof a debt is owed. Stricken as proof required by Lee’s bill is the contract which must contain the signature of the defendant and copies of documents generated when the credit card was actually used. Left in the bill is just a requirement that to prove the debt, the debt collector needs “A copy of the contract, charge‑off statement, or other writing evidencing the original debt.” Will a Post-It note be sufficient now?

And in order to get a summary judgment against consumers who already don’t know how to defend themselves, all that will be required will be:

“The only evidence sufficient to establish the amount and nature of the debt shall be at least all of the following items:
(1) The original account number.
(2) The original creditor.
(3) The total amount claimed to be owed.
(4) An itemization of post charge‑off payments or credits, where applicable.
(5) The charge‑off balance, or, if the balance has not been charged off, an explanation of how the balance was calculated.
(6) An itemization of post charge‑off fees, where applicable.
(7) The date of last payment, where applicable.
(8) The amount of post charge‑off interest claimed, and the basis for the interest charged.”

All of that appears to be easy to just pull from the air and write on that Post-It note rather than say, actually have proof and evidence to support the claim.

Senator Harry Brown from North Carolina is quoted as saying, “I think the intent of this bill is to find a balance between where we are today and maybe where we were before ’09 … I think the key point of this is, this is debt that someone has gone out and decided not to pay.”

But even Brown is as clueless as Lee. This is not an issue about not paying a valid debt. It is an issue that the debt that is being collected or sued over is in fact a valid debt.

Lee appears to be sticking to his illusions this bill won’t screw consumers, “The burden of proof is not shifted in this matter,” Lee countered. “I’m getting a little frustrated there are so many misstatements coming out.” – Source

Surely, simply asking that the bad debt buyer have the proof the debt is really owed with common sense documentation like statements and contracts is not a requirement that North Carolina lawmakers should try to dilute. What do you think?

This article by Steve Rhode first appeared on Get Out of Debt and was distributed by the Personal Finance Syndication Network.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

United's First Back to Back Defeat, Manchester United Week 34 Recap

Manchester United squared off against Everton this past weekend, continuing their campaign to finish in the top four of the English Premier League table. Although, they were favorites to win the match, they were unable to replicate their winning form, falling defeated for the second week in a row to the resurgent Merseyside Blues, who are now undefeated in their last six matches.

Louis Van Gaal’s selections were again affected by injuries this week to Phil Jones and Michael Carrick. Paddy McNair replaced Jones and Daley Blind was started in place of the calm, collected Carrick. Usual starters adopted the other spots in the lineup as David De Gea started in goal, Antonio Valencia, Chris Smalling, and Luke Shaw rounded out the back four; Juan Mata, Ander Herrera, Marouane Fellaini, and Ashley Young comprised the rest of the midfield, and Wayne Rooney started in the lone striker position.

It was almost immediately evident that the day would be Everton’s as United’s defense appeared disjointed and unsettled. In the fifth minute, an Everton counter attack began from their 18-yard box. The goal-scorer James McCarthy received a through ball at the edge of the United box, dribbled in between two weak challenges from McNair and Blind, and struck his shot past David De Gea. Shortly after, Fellaini was gifted a chance to equalize, but squandered it by striking his shot way over the bar.

For the second week in a row, United dominated the possession in the game, but also unfortunately were not able to convert possession into goals. A well-worked possession led to a chance for Daley Blind. His shot required a save, but did very little to challenge Everton’s goalkeeper, Tim Howard.

Everton lengthened their lead on a corner kick that was earned on yet another counter-attack started by right back Seamus Coleman. Leighton Baines delivered a wonderful cross to the near post that was headed well to the far post by John Stones. It was nearly headed off the line by Ashley Young, but the winger’s efforts were ultimately futile on Stones’ brilliant header.

With the lion’s share of possession, there was a genuine hope and belief that United could get back into the game with at least one goal. Radamel Falcao’s inclusion into the game certainly added more excitement to the attacking front, but still United were unable to find the goal.

United’s backline, however, seemed to have given up as Everton’s third goal seemed to evidence. An in the air through ball was played, as the Red Devil’s defense stepped up and drew off Romelu Lukaku. The ball, however, did not go to Lukaku, it seemed to have a mind of its own, skidding perfectly into the run of Kevin Mirallas. The United backline completely shutdown on the pass, disregarding Mirallas’s run, hoping for an offside whistle. Mirallas took up the ball and dribbled into the box to take his chance well, leaving no hope for De Gea and putting an emphatic end to the game.

United’s back-to-back defeats in the past two weeks marks the first time this season that they’ve been defeated twice in a row. The result places United in fourth place in the league table, but most importantly, seven points ahead of Liverpool and Tottenham. United need six points in order to clinch at least a fourth place finish over these team, which should be relatively easy to accomplish in their last four matches. There may be some bad news on the other hand involving the health of Wayne Rooney, who was noticeably hampered by an injury he sustained in the match against Everton, prompting a substitution. His health will be a huge concern to the Dutch manager, who will hope his side can return to their goal scoring ways. They have a great opportunity to bounce back against West Bromwich Albion on Saturday at Old Trafford. The game will be aired on CNBC at 12pm.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Dare to Be 100: Too Much of a Good Thing

In 1970 Dad died. He was 74. I was 40. I, an only child, worshipped him. He was everything that I could ever hope to be, my Alpha and Omega.

I crashed. I couldn’t think, eat, sleep, work. I was clinically depressed. Somehow I was still smart enough to know that exercise is a fabulous treatment for depression.

I put on my running shoes, cut off some jeans, and started to wobble around the neighborhood. As a Walter Mitty type, in 1971 I ran the Boston Marathon, slowly. I was captured, and probably addicted. That was the first of 43 consecutive annual marathons I ran all over the world, New York, London, San Francisco, Big Sur, my favorite, Limerick, Athens, Australia, Beijing. I was on Heartbreak Hill in Boston, mile 21, for the infamous 2013 bomb punctured event. Four years ago I was in Oxford on a visit so I was keen to run on the track where in 1951 Roger Bannister broke the four-minute mile barrier. It took me 13 minutes to do my mile. He could have lapped me four times, but who cares how fast? My friend, great middle distance runner Ron Clarke from Melbourne observed that “the race of life goes not to the runner who starts out first but to the one who slows down last.” Running became my religion. I was and am on the editorial board of Runner’s World. I preached fitness to my friends and patients with probably excess fervor. Not that I have any outstanding credentials as a runner. I am slow and awkward, often the last one in.

My decades of long distance running not only lifted my temporary depression, but also has served to consider myself immunized against life’s problems, protected by a suit of armor which is a metaphor that I have used as a blog. Exercise is the universal treatment for every ailment, body or mind, cheap, effective universally available, and safe. I am an exercise zealot.

But then three weeks ago while idling I sensed a funny flutter in my chest. I had started to fibrillate. Instead of my heart beating in its usual synchronous pattern the top chambers, the atria, became chaotic. Then the ventricles beneath which are the main pumping chambers and derive their signaling from the atria developed their own intrinsic chaotic beat around 60 per minute, but irregular. No pain.

I continue to run regularly, three miles per trip, up and down.

I turned myself into my friendly cardiologist colleagues who are appropriately conservative in their advisories. I may have a cardioversion in my future, to see if the normal rhythm can be jumped back to normal.

I don’t like it. I can’t stand anything being wrong with me. I deny any frailty, but cannot neglect the reality in this case my heart simply doesn’t pump as it should rendering me too easily breathless. The tumbles in my chest are not pleasant.

My theory presumes that my decades of endurance running has stretched the walls of the atria of my heart, and thereby tented the nervous conduction fibers that regulate the rhythm. My echocardiogram shows this stretch.

All of this bruises my ego. I like myself better when I am super fit, but now the reality must be faced.

There was a fine summary article in the New Yorker, July 15 2014 by Dr. Lisa Rosenbaum, a cardiologist herself. Her article is titled “Extreme Exercise and the Heart.” (1) She summarizes what we know and don’t know. Previously the Greek dogma was “everything in moderation.” Dr. Rosenbaum seconds this advice. She quotes Dr. James O’Keefe of Kansas City who says that extra exertion can be harmful to the heart. We do know that endurance exercise features a higher incidence of fibrillation. Beyond the known cardioprotective benefits of exercise lurks the possibility that more need not necessarily be better.

How much is enough? How much is too much? for how long? What is the threshold of value?

At age 85 and fibrillating I don’t back down on the benefits that have accrued to my life and continue to do so. I just don’t like myself with a bruise on my heart. It is not broken, but bumpy. I conclude that exercise is still the best treatment, but maybe I ran too much.

Reference:

Rosenbaum, L. Extreme Exercise and the Heart / The New Yorker, July 15, 2014.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.