Android 5.1.1 Lollipop Update Rolling Out To Nexus 10 (2013)

nexus-10-2013-rumor

Android 5.1.1 Lollipop is making its way to an array of devices recently, and now it is being directed towards Nexus 10 tablet (2013). The firmware update is of 14MB file size, which means that there is not much coming with this update. This update does not really have any new feature, but it will take care of many bugs that have rolled in with the previous update.

Nexus 10 (2013) users should expect this update to read sometime now and the next few days, although there is no stipulated timeline for it to reach each user. Moral of the story is that all those who are using this device and are still stuck on Android 5.1, will receive this small update that would enhance their device’s performance by eliminating bugs.

Being an over-the-air (OTA) update, users will have to wait until it comes to their tablets automatically. In order to update it manually, we got to wait until there comes a link to download the OTA file. However, one must know that doing it manually would take whole of efforts of downloading and flashing it to your device, the manual install process is a bit complex in comparison to automatic update.

In case you don’t get the notification, simply go to the settings > about> software update. By tapping the “software update” option, you will get to know if your device has got the update or not.

Are you a Nexus 10 user? If yes, then let us know about the device’s performance post Android 5.1.1 update.

Android 5.1.1 Lollipop Update Rolling Out To Nexus 10 (2013) , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.



Republicans Vote to Repeal Obamacare for the 58th Time

Today, the Republicans’ voted for their ‘Work Harder for Less’ Budget. It is another shameless attempt to repeal Obamacare, despite all the clear benefits of the health care law.

The numbers don’t lie on Obamacare: more than 15 million people who were previously uninsured now have health insurance. The law has also improved health care for seniors: 9.4 million seniors have saved more than $15 billion on prescription drugs costs and 39 million seniors on Medicare have received free preventative services. In addition, millions of young adults (under 26) are able to remain on their parents’ insurance plans.

Despite all this indisputable progress toward affordable, quality health care for all Americans, House Republicans continue to waste time and taxpayers dollars fighting last year’s war. My message to Republicans: get over it, stop wasting taxpayer dollars. Instead, we should put hardworking families first by voting on legislation to create jobs, raise wages, provide equal pay for women, invest in education, protect voting rights, and pass comprehensive immigration reform.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

In Praise of Blasphemy

American friends, especially PEN Club writers, please read, right now, Caroline Fourest’s new book, Eloge du blasphème (In Praise of Blasphemy, Grasset 2015), if you wish to understand:

1. why Charlie Hebdo was and is more respectful to Muslims than the idiots who think they are honoring Islam by killing;

2. that the real provocateurs were not the cartoonists themselves but those who waved the cartoons under the noses of Muslims who otherwise would not have seen them, thereby stirring up demonstrations that served, here, to draw attention from their own infamy; there, to appropriate the mantle of true defender of the prophet; or, on other occasions, to apply pressure in one or another international negotiation (for example, on nuclear power);

3. that the cover Charlie Hebdo ran after the killing, the cover depicting the prophet with a tear in his eye and the caption “All is forgiven,” was the most peaceful, elegant, and conciliatory message conceivable and that those who asserted otherwise were inflammatory cynics;

4. that those who dared to say that Charlie “had it coming” are like the louts who say, after a woman is raped, “Her skirt was too short”;

5. that the anti-Charlie coalition in France is a motley crew in which one finds the neofascist Le Pen (who detects in the affair the hand of the “secret services”), the Islamic brother Tariq Ramadan (who declared that Charb and Wolinski were “cowards”), the former cartoonist Siné (who has never been “afraid to admit,” as he did once on the radio, that he is an anti-Semite who wants “every Jew to live in fear”), the Indivisibles (the supposedly left-wing sect that, after having agreed with Bin Laden’s assertion in 2010 that he “had the right” to respond to the banning of the burqa in France with decapitations in Pakistan, declared that the problem was not terrorist attacks but the “climate of Islamophobia” that inspired them), and the always-present appeasers (who, in this case, are the proponents of a holy alliance of religions);

6. that, in adhering to this position of putative wisdom and forbearance and in solemnly swearing never, ever to criticize thy neighbor’s taboo, one must ignore the inconvenient detail that what is taboo for group A is almost always blasphemy for group B, and that sacramentalizing taboos helps propel the merry-go-round of murderous, mimetic violence;

7. that incitement to murder is a felony, whereas laughing at religion, even ridiculing it, is a right;

8. that racism against French citizens of Muslim heritage is criminal, whereas criticism of the Koran, like criticism of Jewish and Christian holy scriptures, is an expression of secularism;

9. that some caricatures stigmatize whereas others, such as those of Charlie Hebdo, emancipate;

10. that there are those who try, through laughter, to strengthen the solidarity of the shaken; others who seek to set one group against another;

11. that the concept of Islamophobia is an empty one that serves only to disarm the anti-racist vigilance mounted against the anti-Jewish, anti-Christian, anti-atheist, and even anti-Muslim hate preached by some Muslims;

12. that it is possible, alas, to be both a Muslim and a racist;

13. that minorities are not always right and that when they are wrong — when the oppressed and excluded themselves become racist — we must not hesitate to point this out;

14. that many who say “I don’t want to stigmatize the oppressed” or “I’m afraid that in passing judgment I will add to their insecurity and unhappiness” really mean that they do not want to offend the Saudis (proponents of the burqa), irritate the Pakistanis (for whom declaring oneself to be a Catholic, as Asia Bibi did, is a crime punishable by death), or even, while we’re on the subject, wound the North Koreans (who would love to see us censor films that make fun of them);

15. that if we follow reasoning like this it will not be long before our civil and criminal codes are cluttered with all the laws of all the world’s dictatorships;

16. that, curiously, the same American television executives who elected not to show the Charlie Hebdo caricatures did not hesitate to show the battered body of the police officer who was protecting Charb: Are they hypocrites? Did they decide, after thinking it over, that it was less costly to offend the grieving family of a defender of democracy than the royal family of Qatar or Kuwait?

17. that, when one takes a good look at the great scenes of jihadism, when one considers that the assassins of Theo Van Gogh and of the attack on the cultural center in Copenhagen grew up in the European cities that are the most open to foreigners, when one realizes that Jihadi John, one of the Islamic State’s most virulent decapitators, is a graduate of the University of Westminster, when one thinks of the billionaire Bin Laden or of Omar Saeed Sheikh, the moneyed young man who kidnapped Daniel Pearl, when one remembers, inversely, that it was undocumented, unmoneyed Lassana Bathily who saved six Jews, one of them a baby, at the kosher market in Vincennes, it is no longer possible to decently assert a correlation between terrorism and the “rifts in our society”;

18. that poverty is not an excuse;

19. that one falls into jihadism out of ideology or personal proclivity, not out of social desperation.

Caroline Fourest’s Eloge du blasphème is indeed a must-read. Few books are as bracing, stimulating, and immediately useful in the struggles that have been thrust upon us. I would like to see it distributed to every guest at the PEN American Center’s annual gala on May 5.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Anatomy of a Riot

2015-04-29-1430312912-9806738-460x.jpg

_______

Why do babies cry? Why do toddlers suddenly go limp and throw themselves onto the shiny white floor of the soap aisle in Target? Why do drunk men fight at bars?

Why do oppressed young men riot?

The inability to communicate breeds frustration and anger. I know this firsthand as I watched my mountain of an ex-cop grandfather struggle for years after suffering a stroke a couple of years after retiring from the force. His ability to speak had deteriorated to such a point that he would routinely throw a fit in frustration over family members not understanding what he was saying. It was hard to see, but we understood his anger.

This is why the baby cries. This is why the four-year-old screams for seemingly no real or valid reason. This is why young men — white, black, or brown — riot. Because for whatever reason, their ability to verbalize is clouded behind the thick walls of failed government and social policies.

It is why calling them “thugs,” as CNN’s Erin Burnett wanted to do, is inaccurate.

What would be accurate is to suggest that the “thugs” are those who have been in charge of the city of Baltimore for the past four decades, who by all accounts, haven’t done a thing to improve their city since the riots of ’68 happened following the death of Martin Luther King Jr. The aftermath of those riots is still seen by the abandoned buildings and burned out businesses that still litter the city.

Burning cars and looting businesses is just a method built out of convenience. Rioters will use whatever is near for them to use, as was the case in Keene, NH last year when college kids (mainly white suburban kids) used pumpkins and beer cans to hurl at police during the town’s Great Pumpkin Festival. They, too, overturned and set cars on fire.

Many thought Paul Revere was a thug. Yes, that Paul Revere. The man who warned us that the British were coming was a constant thorn in Britain’s side. He was also a rebel and hung out with “the wrong crowd” (even by 18th century standards). He was a thief, and by all accounts, yes, a thug. Had the Boston Massacre taken place 200 years later, we’d have seen cars burned, a CVS looted, and a motorcycle gang popping wheelies in and out of a euphoric group of protesters. Among the canisters of tear gas and burning gasoline, we’d probably see Paul Revere.

Let us not focus on how we riot, but why we riot.

Why do we riot?

_______

Chris Peak is a freelance writer from Boston. He blogs at Huffington Post, and has contributed to Gawker, GOOD Magazine, Deadspin, and Point Magazine. 

Follow him on Twitter.

AP Photo/David Goldman

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Police Van Carrying Freddie Gray Made Previously Undisclosed Second Stop

BALTIMORE (AP) — The refusal of authorities to provide more than a few sketchy details about the Freddie Gray investigation may be legally appropriate, but many people in Baltimore were finding it hard to be patient Thursday when police revealed nothing about the internal investigation they turned over to the state’s attorney’s office.

Nearly two weeks after Gray’s death, the public still doesn’t know much more than it did on Day One. The central question – what caused his fatal spinal cord injury – remains a mystery.

“The transparency is just not there,” the Rev. Cortly “C.D.” Witherspoon said after Police Commissioner Anthony Batts refused to answer any questions Thursday.

Batts said his department’s report was delivered a day ahead of time to State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby, and that from now on, any questions should go to her.

Mosby also declined to talk, issuing a statement Thursday asking “for the public to remain patient and peaceful and to trust the process of the justice system.”

With rumors flying about how Gray’s spine was “80 percent severed,” as his family’s lawyer Billy Murphy put it, police did release a new piece of information Thursday, but it served mostly to raise more questions about how truthful the six suspended officers have been with investigators.

Deputy Commissioner Kevin Davis said investigators discovered a security camera recording showing that the police van carrying Gray had made a previously undisclosed, second stop, after the 25-year-old black man was put in leg irons and before the van driver made a third stop and called for help to check on his condition. The van then made a fourth stop, to pick up another passenger, before Gray arrived at the police station with the fatal spinal-cord injury that left him unresponsive.

The Associated Press talked later Thursday with grocery store owner Jung Hyun Hwang, who said officers came in last week to make a copy. Speaking in Korean, he said the only other copy had been stolen, along with his video equipment, when looters destroyed his store Monday night. He told the AP that he didn’t see what the recording showed.

Police had said Gray was obviously injured and asking for medical help when he was hoisted into the van on April 12, and unresponsive on arrival at the station. He died in a hospital after a week in a coma.

Then, last week, Batts said the additional passenger who was picked up along the way had told investigators the driver did not speed, make sudden stops or “drive erratically” during the trip, and that Gray was “was still moving around, that he was kicking and making noises” up until the van arrived at the police station.

Baltimore police have been less forthcoming than police in Ferguson, Missouri, after white officer Darren Wilson fatally shot a black man, 18-year-old, Michael Brown, last year in an incident officially deemed self-defense. For example, Baltimore police haven’t publicly revealed the suspended officers’ races or disciplinary histories.

Beyond the slim chronology, authorities have refused to discuss evidence, such as the details of his handling to statements from any of the six suspended officers. Their names are known only because the AP and other news organizations filed public records requests for the documents police filed seeking to have Gray charged with carrying a switchblade.

“I understand there are questions people want to have answered, but unfortunately, we can’t release any more about it,” Capt. J. Eric Kowalczyk said.

The forensic pathologists who studied Gray’s body for clues also aren’t making official statements.

Bruce Goldfarb, a spokesman for the Maryland State Medical Examiner’s Office, told the AP Thursday that the office has completed Gray’s autopsy, but the forensic investigation is still in process and no conclusions have been sent to police or prosecutors. When the report is complete, Goldfarb said, a copy will be sent to the Baltimore State’s Attorney’s Office.

“The autopsy has been done, it only takes about two and a half hours,” Goldfarb said. “The autopsy is only one part of the forensic investigation. The whole point is to determine cause and manner of death, and there are lab tests and lots of other things that have to be done.”

Legal experts and the Gray family lawyers say secrecy is appropriate at this point in the probe, when it’s still possible that some witnesses haven’t been questioned, or even found.

“By releasing too many details, you run the risk that witnesses’ testimony will change to mirror the details you have released,” said David S. Weinstein, a former federal prosecutor now in private practice in Miami. He said investigators must verify or corroborate much of the information they receive, and meanwhile the public could be misled that the probe is leading to a particular outcome.

Investigators also face challenges with police that are different from killings by civilians. There’s the question of whether an officer acted “reasonably” considering the circumstances – a common defense in use-of-force cases. And investigators can’t simply force officers to give statements or lose their jobs, because that would mean their testimony is coerced, and therefore wouldn’t hold up in court, Weinstein said.

“If they are compelled to give a statement as a condition of their employment, you cannot then use those statements against them in a criminal proceeding,” he said. “This is where the decision to grant immunity comes into play.”

The Gray family’s lawyers sought to dispel the idea that the police report would be made public at this point.

“This family wants justice, and they want justice that comes at the right time and not too soon,” attorney Hassan Murphy said Wednesday.

People are right to demand transparency, but the appropriate time for disclosure is either during a trial, if charges are filed, or when prosecutors announce no indictments, said Steve Levin, a former federal prosecutor in Baltimore who now works as a defense attorney.

The voracious 24-hour news cycle is another factor, especially so when civil unrest and violence are involved. Saturating the public with information prior to filing criminal charges also can make it extremely difficult to seat an impartial jury later, said Robert Jarvis, a law professor at Nova Southeastern University.

“It makes it appear that they are not doing anything, which leads to unfounded criticism and can rush law enforcement into ill-considered action,” Jarvis said.

Meanwhile, protests over Gray’s death are spreading and continuing. Crowds gathered Thursday in Philadelphia and Baltimore. Other protests led to arrests in New York and elsewhere.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Someone Isn't Telling The Truth About Freddie Gray's Death

By now, everybody knows the injuries that contributed to Freddie Gray’s death. Baltimore authorities and representatives for Gray’s family agree that the 25-year-old sustained fatal trauma to his neck and spine at some point while in police custody following his arrest on April 12. Although a full autopsy hasn’t yet been released, the family has said that Gray’s spine was nearly severed, and that his doctors had attempted to repair three fractured neck vertebrae and a crushed voice box. Last week, The Baltimore Sun spoke to medical experts who said that Gray’s injuries were, in the paper’s words, comparable to those seen in “victims of high-speed crashes.”

On Thursday, unnamed law enforcement sources told WJLA that according to a police report shared with prosecutors earlier that day, an investigation into Gray’s death suggested the fatal injuries occurred when Gray slammed into the back of the police transport van. The officer driving the van has not yet given a statement.

While this may end up being a significant detail of the investigation, much is still unclear about the circumstances of Gray’s death, including how Gray’s head might have hit the wall of the van hard enough to kill him. Over the past few weeks, Baltimore police have provided few answers about how Gray went from seemingly healthy enough to flee police on the morning of April 12 to dead on April 19 after a week in a coma. On Wednesday, April 29, hours after stating that they would not give the public their forthcoming internal report on Gray’s death, police leaked a different document to The Washington Post. It was the first new piece of information from police in nearly a week. But instead of clarity, it offered more confusion.

The Post reported that a prisoner who was in the van with Gray allegedly told investigators he could hear Gray “banging against the walls” of the police vehicle, and said he believed Gray was “intentionally trying to injure himself,” according to a document written by a Baltimore police investigator. However, in a subsequent interview with WBAL, the man, identified as Donte Allen, seemed to walk back his claims.

Allen’s remarks are just the latest entry in a series of questions and inconsistencies that have left the public wondering what really happened to Freddie Gray. None of this necessarily means that someone is lying about it, but clearly someone, intentionally or otherwise, is not telling the truth.

Did police have probable cause to arrest Gray?

freddie gray
Gray is seen in an undated family photo.

Court documents filed by Baltimore police Officer Garrett Miller claim that Gray caught the attention of the police because he ran. Deputy Commissioner Kevin Davis told reporters that three officers chased Gray — one on foot and two on bikes. “It’s a foot chase,” he said, “and it’s a long one.” When asked last week for an explanation for Gray’s arrest, Baltimore police Commissioner Anthony Batts said that “just running — there is no law against running.”

A witness told the Sun that Gray may have run because he had previously been beaten by one of the officers.

Whatever the reason, court papers show that the only charge police intended to file against Gray was for possession of a switchblade knife, which they say was clipped to the inside of his front pants pocket.

Was force used during Freddie Gray’s arrest?

In its account of Gray’s arrest, the Baltimore Police Department has maintained that he was picked up “without force or incident.” The court documents filed by Miller say that Gray was nabbed by police because he “fled unprovoked upon noticing police presence.” After police found the knife, he was arrested.

In its reporting of the incident, The Baltimore Sun found witnesses who refuted Miller’s account to the court. In an April 25 article, Sun reporter Kevin Rector wrote: “Kevin Moore, a 28-year-old friend of Gray’s from Gilmor Homes, said he rushed outside when he heard Gray was being arrested and saw him ‘screaming for his life’ with his face planted on the ground. One officer had his knee on Gray’s neck, Moore said, and another was bending his legs backward. ‘They had him folded up like he was a crab or a piece of origami,’ Moore said. ‘He was all bent up.’” Other alleged eyewitnesses claimed to have seen officers beating Gray with their batons.

At one point during the arrest, according to the police commissioner, an officer pulled out a stun gun. Moore claimed to have seen this as well. According to the Sun, police investigators failed to obtain footage from a convenience store surveillance camera that may have captured the incident more clearly. Instead, the officers found that the moment in question had been taped over by the time they got there. This was a common theme throughout the investigation, as officers reportedly failed to obtain footage from other cameras that may have recorded key moments in Gray’s subsequent ride to the police station.

A third perspective on Gray’s arrest was added to the mix on Wednesday, when CNN interviewed an anonymous relative of one of the arresting officers. The woman said the officer believes Gray “was injured outside the paddy wagon,” though she expressed personal concern that “six officers are going to be punished behind something that maybe one or two or even three officers may have done to Freddie Gray.”

Was Gray injured before he was loaded into the van?

gray hospital
A family photo shows Gray in the hospital after his arrest.

While police insist they didn’t use force on Gray during the arrest, Davis appeared to suggest last week that Gray was injured before he was put in the van, and that officers failed to offer medical assistance despite requests from Gray.

“Quite frankly, that’s exactly where Freddie Gray should have received medical attention,” said Davis, referring to the scene of the arrest. “He did not.”

According to witnesses, Gray’s legs looked like they had been damaged during the arrest. He was also having trouble breathing, and police say he asked for an inhaler and other assistance but was denied.

Police have also claimed that a preliminary autopsy report showed that Gray’s only injury was the one to his spinal cord. The full results of that examination are still forthcoming.

Batts said last week that officers didn’t exercise proper protocol following whatever injuries Gray supposedly sustained while in the van. “No excuses for me. Period,” Batts said. “We know our police employees failed to get him medical attention in a timely manner multiple times.”

But according to the charging documents filed in court, police claimed to have attended to Gray with proper urgency. Miller described the arrest as by-the-book: “During transport to Western District via wagon transport the defendant suffered a medical emergency and was immediately transported to Shock Trauma via medic.”

What happened during Gray’s van ride?

This is the critical question, and there is still no clear answer. Witness video shows Gray screaming at the time he was loaded into the vehicle. According to the official police timeline, the van made its first stop four minutes later so that officers could shackle an “irate” Gray. He was removed from the van and was placed in leg irons.

At this point, witnesses report seeing a “commotion” in which they say police hit Gray with batons. Again, police have maintained that a preliminary autopsy report indicates Gray didn’t suffer any injuries other than the one to his spinal cord.

Police and witnesses then agree that Gray was returned to the van in both hand and leg restraints. Officers have admitted they didn’t buckle Gray’s seat belt, a violation of police department policy that has led to suggestions that Gray may have been the victim of a “rough ride” — an illegal but not uncommon technique in which officers drive vans in such a way as to cause injury to detained passengers.

A few minutes later, a second stop was reportedly made. The fact of this stop was not reported until Thursday, April 30, 18 days after Gray’s arrest. Police said they learned about the second stop while canvassing local businesses in search of surveillance footage of the van. It’s unclear what happened during this episode.

At 8:59 a.m., about 15 minutes after Gray was first put in the van, the vehicle stopped for a third time after the driver asked an officer to perform a check on Gray. This had previously been explained as the second stop, and exactly what happened there was reportedly a key part of the investigation. Batts has said that responding officers had to “pick [Gray] up off the floor and place him on the seat,” and that Gray requested a medic at this time. He was ignored again.

The fourth and final stop was made minutes later to pick up another prisoner. At this point, it’s unclear what state Gray was in. Davis has suggested that Gray was again found on the floor, but responsive enough to make another request for a medic. If this request was indeed made, it was evidently denied. Other reports suggest that Gray may have already lost consciousness when this second person was picked up.

Whatever the case, the account of the second prisoner, Donte Allen, was leaked to The Washington Post on Wednesday. It has led to questions about what happened during the minutes-long, six-block ride to Baltimore’s Western District station, where police say Gray was removed from the van unconscious and unable to breathe.

How was Gray acting in the police van?

Details of Allen’s account conflict with earlier reports on Gray’s time in the van, including reports from police officials themselves. According to the Post, Allen told investigators that Gray was “banging against the walls” and “intentionally trying to injure himself.” But Allen later told WBAL: “When I got in the van, I didn’t hear nothing. It was a smooth ride. We went straight to the police station. All I heard was a little banging for about four seconds. I just heard little banging, just little banging.”

WBAL investigative reporter Jayne Miller had told MSNBC on Wednesday that her own reporting suggested Gray was in no state to behave in the manner described in the Post report.

“According to our sources, by the time that prisoner is loaded into that van, Freddie Gray was unresponsive,” Miller said. “Secondly, we have reported [there] is no evidence, medical evidence, that Freddie Gray suffered any injury that indicates that he injured himself.”

Medical professionals have also said the catastrophic nature of Gray’s trauma suggests it was not self-inflicted.

Thursday’s developments about the nature of Gray’s injury don’t necessarily change any of Miller’s reporting. If the only factor in his death was in fact the spinal damage he reportedly suffered while in the back of the police van, the circumstances of that incident remain unclear.

In fact, only one thing has become clear since Freddie Gray’s death: The police aren’t telling the whole story. And what they have chosen to disclose has in most cases left us with further questions, not concrete answers.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The 2015 Latin Billboard Awards Red Carpet Was Sequined, Colorful And Ruffled All Over

The 2015 Latin Billboard Awards kicked off with a bang in Miami Thursday night. There was no shortage of glitz, glamour, and of course, Jennifer Lopez.

Stars stepped out in revealing necklines, sequins and not to mention, a whole lot of sky-high slits.

Lopez, who is set to pay tribute to Selena Quintanilla during the ceremony, looked stunning in a silver jumpsuit and white cape.

Check out all the looks of the night below:

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

NFL Draft 2015: Jameis Winston Picked By Tampa Bay Buccaneers

CHICAGO (AP) — 7:22 p.m. (8:22 p.m. EDT)

Marcus Mariota can bring his lei to Music City, y’all.

Mariota, who wore the flowers while watching the draft from home in Hawaii, is bound for the Tennessee Titans, who used the second pick on the Heisman winner.

Tennessee used all but about 60 seconds of its 10-minute time allotment before sending the pick in to NFL executives.

Most people thought the Titans were open to a trade, but it didn’t come about.

Mariota and Jameis Winston are the sixth pair of QBs to go 1-2 in the draft since 1967, joining the likes of Jim Plunkett and Archie Manning (1971), Peyton Manning and Ryan Leaf (1998) and Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III (2012).

___

7:11 p.m. (8:11 p.m. EDT)

Whew. The wait is finally over. Thank goodness. Now, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers get to stress out for the next three or four years to see what really comes of the first pick of the NFL draft — quarterback Jameis Winston of Florida State.

The Bucs put an end to months of speculation by selecting the talented-but-troubled signal caller, who won the Heisman Trophy in 2013.

Winston was not present in Chicago, choosing to watch the draft at home in Alabama.

(Oh, and Commissioner Roger Goodell got booed again when he came out to announce the pick.)

Winston apparently did enough to convince the owners of the first pick that he’s worth the risk.

He’s the first QB to be selected first since Andrew Luck in 2012. Winston is also the first player from Florida State, which produces gobs of NFL talent, to be picked first in the draft.

Tennessee is on the clock.

___

7:03 p.m. (8:03 p.m. EDT)

New York. Chicago. Some things just won’t change.

Commissioner Roger Goodell, speaking at Grant Park in Chicago, gets booed heartily inside the auditorium while video of him officially opening the draft is played inside the auditorium.

Tampa Bay is on the clock.

___

6:30 p.m. (7:30 p.m. EDT)

Some news in the lead-up to the NFL draft, which starts in about a half-hour:

—The league denies a request from LSU offensive lineman La’el Collins to pull his name out of the draft and be placed in the supplemental draft later this year. Police want to talk to Collins, a projected first-round pick, about the slaying of his ex-girlfriend. He is not considered a suspect.

—The Titans, who hold the second pick, will entertain offers for that pick but those offers probably won’t be coming from the Chargers. A report out of San Diego says quarterback Philip Rivers, in search of a contract extension, has been told he won’t be traded.

—The Randy Gregory watch is on. The Nebraska pass rusher’s stock has taken a hit since news hit that he tested positive for marijuana at the NFL scouting combine. Gregory was thought to be a top-10 pick, though some reports today speculate he has fallen completely off several teams’ draft boards.

___

5:56 p.m. (6:56 p.m. EDT)

Are these clues? Or is he just trying to drive all those 12th men crazy?

Seahawks coach Pete Carroll is trying to generate some buzz over Seattle’s draft, even though the Seahawks don’t (currently) have a pick until the end of the second round – a selection that won’t be made until tomorrow night.

Carroll is tweeting out #SeahawksDraftClues that, so far, involve a few skits from comedian Dave Chappelle’s old — and very funny — TV show.

The draft starts in about an hour. The Auditorium Building at Roosevelt University in Chicago is starting to fill up.

___

3:51 p.m. (4:51 EDT)

Let’s boil it down to the basics: A group of executives at 32 multimillion-dollar companies are about to spend several of those millions, and risk their company’s future, on a 21-year-old college kid.

Welcome to the NFL draft.

Character issues are always on the front burner this time of year — and that’s never more true than tonight, where NFL executives will take all their data and make life-changing decisions about a number of players who are flawed in different ways that have nothing to do with throwing, running or catching.

Scott Minto, director of the San Diego State Sports Business MBA program, says no amount of vetting, psychological profiling and background checking can ensure a team of making the right pick.

“You see these players who have transgressions in their past and how do you decide if this player’s going to be a good employee or not?” Minto asks. “It’s a lot of money to invest into someone who’s 22 or 23 years old.”

___

1:05 p.m. (2:05 p.m. EDT)

Well, it’s not exactly March Madness. Then again, it wouldn’t be a true sporting event if you didn’t have a chance to win something based on the outcome, right?

As part of its never-ending and generally successful quest to make every date on its calendar an Event, the NFL has created a contest challenging fans to predict the top 32 picks in this year’s draft. Winner gets an all-expense-paid trip to the season-opening game, Steelers at Patriots, on September 10th.

Much like the gazillions of bracket-filling contests that make the NCAA Tournament what it is, this contest offers chances to form leagues with your buddies, play against strangers and, of course, compete for the grand prize valued at around $4,800. This way, your future and your happiness as an NFL fan can hinge on every pick during tonight’s four-hour extravaganza, not simply the one your favorite team makes.

Need help? Vegas is here for ya. The over-under on Alabama receiver Amari Cooper’s draft position has been set at 4 1/2, per the Bovada website. Bovada has also set 1 1/2 as the over-under for number of running backs — an increasingly unpopular position in NFL-land — to be selected in the first round.

___

11:50 a.m. (12:50 p.m. EDT)

The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are on the clock. The Tennessee Titans are under the microscope.

With the hours ticking down until the start of the NFL draft in Chicago, the Bucs will surprise everyone if they don’t use the top pick to take Jameis Winston, the troubled, talented quarterback out of Florida State. That surprise will turn to shock if they pass on both Winston and this year’s other top quarterback, Heisman Trophy winner Marcus Mariota of Oregon.

What the Titans will do is less certain. The smart money says they’ll take Mariota (or Winston if Tampa Bay unexpectedly passes), but Tennessee likes its current QB, Zach Mettenberger, and if the price is right, the Titans could trade that pick away.

Those potentially in the market for the Heisman winner: San Diego, which can’t get an extension done with Philip Rivers; Philadelphia, whose coach, Chip Kelly, worked with Mariota at Oregon; and, yes, the Cleveland Browns, who have two first-round picks and aren’t quite sure what they’ve got with last year’s glamour pick, quarterback Johnny Manziel.

Only a little more than seven hours to go.

And, by the way, neither Winston nor Mariota will be on hand to shake Commissioner Roger Goodell’s hand after they’re selected. Winston will be watching from Alabama and Mariota is in Hawaii.

___

AP NFL website: www.pro32.ap.org and www.twitter.com/AP_NFL

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Marriage Is an Evolving Institution

I spent this past Tuesday morning as a faithful witness at the U.S. Supreme Court as the justices heard the latest cases on marriage equality. Over the weekend, I offered prayers at congregations in Atlanta and the District of Columbia as part of the National Weekend of Prayer for the Freedom to Marry. More than 315 congregations in 46 states participated in this weekend to support the rights of same-sex couples to legal marriage.

On Sunday evening, at a national multifaith prayer service in D.C., I said that we could be optimistic about the outcome of the Supreme Court’s deliberation as 37 states now allow same-sex couples to marry; a majority of people in the U.S., indeed a majority of religious people in the U.S., now support marriage; and that the Supreme Court would ratify what those who were worshipping together knew: that all persons should have the right to civil marriage.

The first reports and analysis after the Supreme Court deliberations dampened my expectations about the surety of the outcome, particularly the questioning by Justice Kennedy about marriage as an unchanging institution. He said, “This definition [of traditional marriage] has been with us for millennia. And it’s very difficult for the court to say, ‘Oh, well, we know better.’ ”

But, how far that is from the truth. Marriage is an evolving civil and religious institution. In the past, marriage was primarily about property and procreation whereas today the emphasis is on egalitarian partnership, companionship and love. In the past, the state and most religions did not recognize divorce, remarriage, interracial marriage or the equality of the marriage partners. If we go back to Biblical times, men were able to have multiple wives as well as concubines; marriage was forbidden outside of one’s own tribe; women were to be subservient to their husbands; girls were married as soon as they reached puberty; and widows by law were to have sex with her dead husband’s brothers to assure him an heir. Definitions of marriage have definitely changed.

The definitions and legal understandings of marriage in the past century have changed in greater recognition of the humanity of persons and their moral and civil rights. As Justice Ginsburg pointed out, “[Same-sex couples] wouldn’t be asking for this relief if the law of marriage was what it was a millennium ago. I mean, it wasn’t possible. Same-sex unions would not have opted into the pattern of marriage, which was a relationship, a dominant and a subordinate relationship. Yes, it was marriage between a man and a woman, but the man decided where the couple would be domiciled; it was her obligation to follow him.”

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court was asked again to recognize another evolving understanding of marriage, the freedom of same-sex couples to marry. We will continue to pray for the wisdom of the Justices to recognize the rights of all consenting adults to enter into legal marriages that will be recognized in every state, not just some of them.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Real Places On Earth So Surreal, They Look Like Alien Landscapes

If you want to see strange and exotic landscapes, you don’t have to travel the solar system; you just have to take a closer look at our own planet. From fiery pits to rock formations that seem to defy gravity, these views show us a side of the Earth that looks almost alien, but are wholly terrestrial.

Read more…