First Look Of Steve Jobs Movie Is Here, Michael Fassbender In The Lead

Finally, the teaser of the much-awaited Steve Jobs biopic has been released by the Universal Studios. The flick has been directed by the Slumdog Millionaire fame Danny Boyle. The movie has Michael Fassbender essaying the role of Apple’s cofounder, the 38-year old actor can be seen portraying Steve Jobs trademark style of denims paired with turtle neck t-shirt.

The teaser is pretty short (well, that’s why we call it a teaser, but as viewers we want more!), however, it does provides a good view of Michael Fassbender in the lead role. It showcases Fassbender standing on a stage and in the background we hear harsh phrases such as “you can’t write code, you’re not an engineer, what do you do ?” and then there comes an answer from Jobs,“The musicians play the instruments, I play the Orchestra” . Well, that sounds like a good amalgamation of all that has affected the life of Steve Jobs and how he surfaced from the pre-conceived notions and proved himself as a revolutionary thinker and creator.

It does reminds us of Sorkin’s last movie The Social Network, which was based on Mark Zuckerberg, and it started on somewhat similar note and has had the similar way of story telling based on facts.

The movie has been under the scanner for several years and it has been affected time and again with production issues — but things seem to be working smooth now and we have just got served a good glimpse of the movie. It is based on Aaron Sorkin’s screenplay of Steve Jobs life and times, set to hit the theaters on October 9th.

First Look Of Steve Jobs Movie Is Here, Michael Fassbender In The Lead , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.



Apple Acquires GPS Technology Firm Coherent Navigation

12915-7220-navigation_hero_2x-mApple Maps was launched with the best of intentions, but unfortunately it seems that due to Apple’s haste, the app was launched with a lot of flaws, bugs, and errors, something that you do not want from a navigational app. Now over the years Apple has made improvements to its accuracy and features, and it looks like the service could be getting more upgrades thanks to Apple’s latest acquisition.

It has been recently confirmed that Apple has acquired GPS technology firm Coherent Navigation. While it is unclear as to why exactly Apple has acquired the company, based on what the firm does it is pretty obvious that the technology will most likely be integrated into Apple Maps to help further improve upon its accuracy.

For those unfamiliar, Coherent Navigation is a firm that specializes in high-precision GPS. This is not your standard GPS as what it does is that it takes your standard GPS data and data from the Iridium satellite communications constellation to help provide even more precise GPS. It has been used in numerous projects by the US government which includes military location technologies.

Given that the acquisition is rather recent it is unclear if Apple will have enough time to integrate the technology into Apple Maps ahead of WWDC 2015 which takes place next month, but hopefully Apple will have further updates on Apple Maps to share during the event.

Apple Acquires GPS Technology Firm Coherent Navigation , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.



Refreshed MacBook Pro, iMac Launching This Wednesday [Rumor]

MacBook-Pro-with-OS-X-Mavericks-640x393Thinking about picking up a new MacBook Pro or iMac? Maybe you will want to hold off on those purchases for now. According to a report from MacG (via 9to5Mac), it seems that Apple could be refreshing both the 15-inch MacBook Pro and 27-inch iMac this coming Wednesday, so if you’d like to future-proof your purchase, maybe waiting to see what Apple has in store for us might be a good idea.

Starting with the 15-inch MacBook Pro, it should be noted that this is the regular 15-inch model, not the Retina model so if you were hoping for the Retina update, sorry to disappoint. However if you’re not too fussed about whether it’s a Retina model or not, the rumors claim that the updated laptops will get the Force Touch technology. It is also expected to see the usual GPU and CPU upgrades as well, although what specifically remains to be seen.

As for the 27-inch iMac, unfortunately no details about its refresh was mentioned except to say that it will be refreshed. Like we said in the title, this is for the non-Retina version of the iMac so if you don’t have the need for a whopping 5K display, then this update might be for you. In any case Wednesday is just a few days away so do check back with us then for the details, but until then take it with a grain of salt for now.

Refreshed MacBook Pro, iMac Launching This Wednesday [Rumor] , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.



Oculus Rift Development On OS X & Linux Has Been Paused

occulus-vr-dk2-001The other day we reported on the PCs specs that one needed to have in order to use the Oculus Rift device with it. Basically you would require a pretty powerful PC in order to use it properly but what was interesting is that in the announcement, there was no mention of what kind of specs OS X or Linux users should have to use the device as well.

Unfortunately it seems that this is because development of the Oculus Rift on OS X and Linux has been put on hold. According to a post by the device’s chief architect Atman Binstock, “Our development for OS X and Linux has been paused in order to focus on delivering a high quality consumer-level VR experience at launch across hardware, software, and content on Windows. We want to get back to development for OS X and Linux, but we don’t have a timeline.”

So for those of you guys who are running on OS X or Linux, it seems that you won’t be able to use the Oculus Rift on your computers for now. We suppose one could always run Boot Camp to get Windows on OS X, and users running on Linux could dual boot to Windows if they absolutely have to. Not exactly the most convenient setup we admit but we suppose it is an alternative.

In the meantime the folks at Oculus VR have announced the availability of the headset which they have previously stated would begin shipping to customers in Q1 2016.

Oculus Rift Development On OS X & Linux Has Been Paused , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.



My Barnard College Commencemen

Remarks by Ambassador Samantha Power, U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations, at the Barnard College Commencement, May 17, 2015

_________________

Good afternoon, President Spar, faculty, trustees, alumni, families and friends of the strong and beautiful Barnard graduates! Congratulations, class of 2015!

Columbia grad Madeleine Albright has said, “It used to be that the only way a woman could truly make her foreign policy views felt was by marrying a diplomat, and then pouring tea on an offending ambassador’s lap.” I’m here to tell you that in 2015, we have other options! [Applause].

I’m truly honored to be here, and to be among the amazing women, and men, on this stage, and to be with the amazing class of 2015 – I’m so honored that I invited my parents to your graduation. [Applause] And while we’re at it, let’s give a huge round of applause to all the parents and loved ones in the audience.

Your great school came into existence largely due to the vision of a remarkable woman, Annie Nathan Meyer. Meyer didn’t get the kind of schooling you got, or I got. Her mother kept her home as a small child because she wanted company. Meyer read voraciously, finishing all of Dickens’ books by the age of seven. [Laughter]. Yeah, seriously. When she was eleven, her mother died, and while her father agreed to let her go to school, he was so overprotective that he kept her home whenever there was bad weather.

When Meyer learned about a special college course for women at Columbia University, she set about secretly studying for examinations, which she passed on her first try. When she finally told her father, she later wrote, “He drew me gently and lovingly to him and announced, ‘You will never be married…Men hate intelligent wives.'” Meyer decided to go to Columbia anyway.

It was not what she had hoped. Women were not allowed into lectures; instead, they were given a reading list, a short meeting or two with the professor, and then an exam. When Meyer sat for her first exam, she found the questions were based entirely on the lectures that she had been barred from attending. Feeling what she called a “devastating sense of desolation,” she answered as best she could. And though she passed, she eventually dropped out, and, soon after, started her full-court press to secure the education for women that she had been denied. Four years later, in 1889, as we know, Barnard College – your college – was founded.

As Barnard finishes its 125th school year, it is safe to say that the cause of equality has come a very, very, very long way. But what I want to talk to you about today is how some of the remaining barriers to true equality can, and must, be overcome.

First, true equality will mean not letting our doubts silence our voices.

We live in a time where women have made tremendous strides, particularly here in the United States. And you all know the statistics. Women earn 60 percent of all undergraduate and graduate degrees; hold more than half of all professional-level jobs; and study after study shows that companies employing greater numbers of women outperform their competitors. And you know that, at the end of your four years, you are as well-equipped as any Barnard graduating class to make your mark. So why do you still feel that persistent self-doubt? That fear of making mistakes? And why do those doubts sometimes get in the way of your voices being heard?

I wish I had the answer. Instead, all I can tell you is that we all experience that feeling – even if it’s not obvious on the outside. I have even adopted a name for it – the Bat Cave; it’s that dark place in your head where all the voices tell you every reason you can’t do something.

Let me give you an example. Rewind to August 2008. I am working as a senior advisor on the campaign for then-Senator Barack Obama – who has just earned the Democratic nomination for President. And I find out that I’m pregnant with my first child. Now, I have an amazing husband, and this news – it’s seismic. I am over the moon.

And I tell no one at work.

Lots of nods, I bet, back here and up there [Laughter].

I have never gone through this before, and I am worried that if I advertise my blissful state, it will affect how seriously I will be taken by the campaign, and potentially even shut me out of the kind of job that could make an impact. Everything I know of then-Senator Obama and the people around him tells me at the time that this makes zero sense. After all, this is a man who was raised by a single, working mother. A man whose brilliant wife worked while raising two daughters. A man who would go on to demonstrate daily as President his commitment to supporting working moms and dads. But at the time, I am way too deep in the Bat Cave to see any of that.

Eventually, it is my body that tells people the news – not me.

And I acquired quite a collection of scarves.

I ended up having two babies while spending four years at the White House, and thereafter still managed to get to serve in my dream job, representing the United States at the United Nations [Applause]. But if I felt the way I did with a boss like mine, I can only imagine how other women feel – the ecstasy of a pregnancy clouded by the fear it could cause severe professional damage.

Last year, when the Ukraine crisis began, I momentarily experienced another version of this anxiety. Russia, a permanent member of the UN Security Council, is trying to lop off part of its neighbor, Ukraine – a clear violation of the rules that the United Nations was created to defend. An urgent UN Security Council session is called on Russia’s attempted takeover of Crimea. I take my seat, and my mind recalls Prague 1968, Budapest 1956, and some epic occasions in the twentieth century when Ambassadors Adlai Stevenson, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Madeleine Albright, and other legends made memorable, forceful interventions at the United Nations on behalf of the United States.

Then it dawns on me: that’s me now! I’m the United States!

Deep in the Bat Cave, I think of the consequences if my response – the United States’ response – is too forceful, or not forceful enough. I think of the overwhelming responsibility that comes with speaking on behalf of America and the ideals we stand for. And I think of the people of Ukraine who are counting on me. And I speak.

The fact is that doubt – and his more lovable big sister, self-awareness – both are more pronounced among women. Turns out Batwoman’s cave often has more square footage than Batman’s.

True equality will not mean shedding our doubts or our self-awareness – but rather not letting them quiet us when we should be speaking up. There are more than enough forces out there doing that without needing our help. And it will mean that, while everyone will have moments of uncertainty – and humility is an especially prized quality – women should not have to worry that if we stumble, it will be more noticed than when men do the same [Applause].

But it is not enough to find our own voices. True equality also requires that we learn to hear, and lift up, the voices of those whom others choose not to hear. This is my second point: You have to teach yourself to see the people and communities who live in society’s blind spots. Of course, everyone should strive to do this. But as women who, even to this day, know what it feels like to be unheard or unseen, we have an additional responsibility. I think the burden of being treated differently is also our strength – because it gives us the capacity to notice when others are treated differently. To see the blind spots.

That includes the discussion of gender identity on campus, which the Barnard community – and particularly your class – has embraced [Applause]. We must see that seemingly simple actions that most of us don’t have to think twice about – the bathroom we walk into; the gender listed on our driver’s licenses; the name people use to address us; the boxes “male” and “female” on a college application – can be a source of profound anguish for others. We must recognize the cruel and hostile treatment that transgender people experience in so many communities, which, according to one study, has contributed to 40 percent of transgender people in the United States attempting suicide during the course of their lives.

We must all work toward the goal of ensuring equal rights for all people – lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender. And while we have a very long way to go, I’m extremely proud to work for an administration that has lifted Medicare’s ban on covering gender reassignment surgery, and whose Justice Department has decided to take on cases of discrimination based on an individual’s gender identity, including transgender status, under the Civil Rights Act.

Now again, it is no coincidence that women’s colleges have been among the first to embrace this discussion. Women know what it feels like to have to fight to be part of institutions whose doors should never have been closed to them.

You often hear people say that past generations struggled so that you would not have to. But I say, past generations struggled so you would be free to fight on behalf of someone else.

The idea of seeing the struggles of others around you – whether the other is a gender or an ethnic or religious group, or even an entire nation that usually does not have a voice – is one of the principles that has defined President Obama’s foreign policy. We know that America is stronger, that our policies are more effective, and that the world is better off when America is listening. And that includes listening to countries and communities that often feel invisible to the world’s superpowers.

That is why, when I started as the United States Ambassador to the UN a year and a half ago, I decided to visit as many of the other 192 UN ambassadors as I could, regardless of the size or the geopolitical heft of the country that they represent. By visiting their missions, rather than having them travel to ours, as was common practice, I would be able to see the national art they wanted to showcase, the family photos on their desks, the books that they had carried with them long distances to America. And I could show them America’s respect and our curiosity. So far, I’ve visited 119 countries’ missions. And when I visit, I try [Applause], when I visit I try to put my long list of policy asks aside. Instead, I ask the ambassadors about their upbringings, about how they became diplomats, what they are most proud of about their countries.

True equality will mean not just seeing the unseen, but also finding a way to make invisible problems visible – and this is my third point. I think the contemporary conversation about the challenge that women face in balancing a demanding job with raising a family is important. Women are opening up about how overwhelmed they feel trying to “have it all.” Back in 2013, when I arrived in my job, I was still nursing my one-year-old daughter as I tried to move my family to New York, and find schools for my two kids – and no, I did not enroll my then-four-year-old in a Kaplan course so he could get into a New York pre-school. I had to do all this at the same time, roughly, that the Syrian regime decided to stage massive chemical weapons attacks against its people, horrific atrocities were being committed in the Central African Republic, and a new government was cracking down on the opposition in Egypt. When asked by friends whether I subscribed to “lean in,” I would instead describe my philosophy then as “hang on.” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has put it even better – “lean on.”

While Ambassador, I have spoken in public a fair amount about the ways my six-year-old, my now six-year-old son Declan, interacts with my new life – making visible a version of what goes on behind the scenes in many homes. Like most young kids with their parents, he seems to delight in interrupting me when I’m on the phone. “Mommy,” he says, “Can I ask you something?” I shake my head and I whisper, “I’m on the phone.” He says, “Mommy it’s important.” “I’ll be off in a minute.” “But Mommy, what’s the score of the Nationals game?” he says. I beg him to let me finish the call. But he is insistent. “Mommy, I said it’s important.” And I hold my hand over the phone and say – “Mine too, this is important too” – I may well be talking to the UN Secretary-General, a UN envoy on a crackling phone line from a war zone, or a fellow diplomat that I’m trying to put the squeeze on. But nothing persuades Declan. And when this little showdown has abated, and he gives up – which after nine or ten exchanges he does, usually – he invariably storms off in a huff, usually grumbling some version of, “Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine!” He’s had it up to here with Ukraine.

Now, the juggling act that I am attempting pales compared to that faced by moms who are raising kids alone; or who struggle to provide for families on a minimum wage that is not a livable wage [Applause]; or who risk losing their jobs if they have to stay home to care for a sick child. But I share these stories because – even with all the support that I am lucky enough to have – the balancing is hard and making that visible might be useful to somebody somewhere.

Of course, it is not just our personal challenges that we must make visible. There are far bigger and more important problems that we have to shine a bright light on – like the dark chapters of our own nation’s history.

Let me give you one of the most chilling examples. Between 1877 and 1950, nearly 4,000 African Americans were lynched in 12 Southern states, according to a remarkable report released this year by the Equal Justice Initiative. In 1916, a man named Jeff Brown was lynched in Mississippi for accidentally bumping into a white girl while running to catch a train. In 1940, Jessie Thorton was lynched in Alabama for failing to address a white police officer as “Mister.” Many of the lynchings were public spectacles, advertised in advance in newspapers. Vendors hawked popcorn and lemonade. Families had photos taken by the bodies of the victims as souvenirs. In 1893, 10,000 people came to watch the lynching of Henry Smith in Paris, Texas.

One of the most alarming findings of the Equal Justice Initiative report is that there are virtually no public memorials to these killings. South Carolina, which witnessed 164 lynchings during this period, has only a few public markers of where they occurred. But the state has at least 170 memorials to Confederate soldiers of the Civil War.

Fifty years after Selma, and 150 after the end of the Civil War – at a time where there remains such enduring racial inequalities – these sites should not be invisible. We have to stop looking past them. Which is why finding ways to mark more of these sites – as the Equal Justice Initiative plans to do – is such an essential step [Applause].

To memorialize the Holocaust – the most unspeakable atrocity of the 20th century – a German artist named Gunther Denmig began installing what he called stolperstein, or stumbling stones. He placed the tiny, four-inch cubes – which simply note the name, date of birth and, when known, the death of an individual victim – in the ground outside the Holocaust victim’s former home. He started in Cologne, Germany, in 1992, with 250 little stones. Since then, Denmig has laid some 48,000 stolperstein in 18 countries. Any of you who have stumbled upon one knows the impact. The stone telescopes history. In humanizing a single victim – you feel it, if only for a minute, the incomprehensible loss of six million people.

Of course, we cannot limit ourselves to surfacing the dark parts of our past; we must do the same right here in the present. Consider the enduring problem of sexual violence on college campuses [Applause], only a tiny fraction of which is reported by victims. In spite of this problem, we have too often seen colleges and universities falling short of adequately investigating and disciplining perpetrators, and of protecting victims.

And yet – even as we are aware of the seriousness of this problem, it takes a woman picking up a mattress and carrying it around her campus to make people really see it [Applause]. A mattress that a good number of the women in this graduating class have helped carry. And men from Columbia, too.

This challenge of rendering the invisible visible is one I face every day at the United Nations, where the people most directly affected by the policies discussed are often far removed from sight and mind. We talk so often in terms of thousands or even millions of people that it’s easy to lose a sense of what one person is – and why even a single human being’s dignity is so important. So, wherever possible, the United States tries to bring those voices into the debate as a way of sharpening understanding of the human consequences of what can otherwise feel like abstract challenges.

Last September, as the Ebola outbreak was spreading exponentially in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, the most dire evidence-based projections suggested more than a million people would be infected if the international community failed to mount a swift and massive response. Yet most countries were doing far too little to stop the outbreak. Worse, several countries in the region were sealing their borders out of fear, preventing crucial aid from reaching those in need.

So the United States convened the first-ever emergency meeting of the UN Security Council on a public health crisis – and instead of simply having UN officials present statistics and charts, we arranged for a video link from the Security Council to the capital of Liberia, where a 38-year-old healthcare worker named Jackson Naimah was asked to describe what was happening in his country. Jackson, who was working at Médecins Sans Frontières Ebola clinic, described people dying outside the gates because the clinic was overflowing and had run out of beds to take more patients. He described having to turn away a boy with all the symptoms of the virus, whose father had died a week earlier, and he recalled thinking, “This boy is going to take a taxi, and he is going to go home to his family, and he will infect them.” He told the diplomats crammed into the UN chamber: “I feel that the future of my country is hanging in the balance. If the international community does not stand up, we will all be wiped out.”

As Jackson spoke, you could hear a pin drop in the Security Council. People who had not really seen Ebola up to that time were forced to grapple with its monstrous efficiency. And you could feel the momentum in the room shift as, one by one, countries spoke with a greater sense of urgency about the need to stand up rather than stand by.

Today, we haven’t just bent the curve of the epidemic, we are closing in on ending it [Applause]. And we try, we try, to seize every chance we have to bring voices like Jackson’s into discussions at the United Nations. And, when a conflict or a prison cell or some other barrier prevents these individuals from speaking for themselves, we try to describe their experiences in a way that others will hear.

Now, I have talked about what it will mean to secure lasting equality – slaying the bats in our bat caves; taking on the struggles of others seeking dignity; and using a range of means – from mattresses to human contact – to make the invisible visible.

This brings me to my last point, and arguably the simplest. True equality is going to require showing – not telling, but showing – people that change is possible.

Let me tell you what other countries see today when they look at the United States delegation to the UN. They see a woman Permanent Representative – one of only 37 women permanent representatives out of 193 ambassadors to the UN – they also see two other women Ambassadors for the United States, Michele Sison and Isobel Coleman, all three of us working mothers. And when the General Assembly is held each September, the world sees the U.S. delegation led by an African-American man – our President. What we look like to the world matters. Because we know, empirically, that people’s belief systems and biases can be shifted dramatically by what they see.

In West Bengal, India, for example, a political affirmative action program reserved spots for women in village governments. Within seven years, a study found, men’s individual biases against the capacity of women leaders almost fully disappeared; and women have become more likely to run for – and win – local seats. Parents have developed higher aspirations for their daughters, and girls’ expectations have increased for themselves.

I can tell you it’s true personally, as well. As a girl growing up in Ireland – where my family lived until I was nine – I watched my mother attend medical school while playing world-class squash and caring for me and my kid brother. I also learned from the stories my mother and father, Dr. Vera Delaney and Edmund Bourke – both kidney doctors – brought home about their patients. I loved the way they saw their patients not as a spreadsheet of symptoms and diseases, but as individuals. And I learned from the way they knew how to listen to them, and glean the details that others may have missed.

There is no question in my mind that growing up with my mother as my model gave me the confidence – or the hubris – to think that covering the women’s volleyball team for my college newspaper was experience enough to send me to the Balkans to become a war correspondent. Thanks, Mom [Laughter]. And there’s no question that I took from both my parents that – in work, in friendship, in love – we must understand where people around us are coming from, what motivates them, what saddens them, what inspires them, and how they got where they are.

And it’s worth remembering to the extent to which we – any of us here – see the world the way we do; make it to the heights we reach; and experience days of such great pride like this one – it’s worth remembering that all of that starts with the people we saw first. When you hug them after this, thank them for that. And you can give them a round of applause now, too [Applause].

As I’m wrapping up, I want to leave you with one last image. As you know, there are few places where women and girls have endured greater hardship – or been less visible – than in Afghanistan. Under Taliban rule, women couldn’t even walk outside without a male relative and a burqa. No girls were allowed to go to school, and no women served in positions of authority. Today, notwithstanding the persistence of the Taliban and its monstrous attacks against civilians, more than three million Afghan girls are in school. Women hold 28 percent of seats in Afghanistan’s Parliament – a higher proportion, I would note, than in the United States Congress [Applause].

And today, women can not only walk outside without a man or a burqa, but members of Afghanistan’s Women’s National Cycling Team are racing down the country’s roads on their bikes. Team members are pinched for resources, but big on courage. Some drivers yell at them and threaten them, but they ride on. One day, a man on a motorcycle reached out and tried to grab at the captain, causing her to crash and hurt her back. But today she is back on her bike, leading more than 40 other women training with the team.

One of the team members, Malika Yousufi, not only wants to become the first Afghan woman – but the first woman, period – to compete in the Tour de France. She told a reporter, “Nothing will stop us.”

Now, imagine just for a minute, what it must feel like to be a little girl from a rural town in Afghanistan – and to suddenly see those 40 women, in a single file, flying down the road. To see something for the first time that you couldn’t have believed possible. Think about where your mind would go – about the shockwave that image would send through your system. Think what it would allow you to believe possible. You would never be able to think the same way again.

That impact – that is what equality is all about. It is a memorial that forces us to see a dark part of our history. A woman who picks up a mattress to show us a problem we are overlooking. A woman or girl in a classroom, or on a bike, or in the water* – clearing a path that otherwise would have seemed closed or unimaginable.

Now it’s your turn to climb on the bike. As Malika said, nothing can stop you. What will you make people see?

Thank you, and congratulations again, Barnard Class of 2015!

* Ambassador Power gestured to renowned long distance swimmer Diana Nyad, who was in the audience as a 2015 recipient of the Barnard Medal of Distinction.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Feed Me!

2015-05-18-1431948710-1482888-Fantasyfeedanimals.jpg

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Deadly Hawaii Osprey Crash Renews Safety Fears In Japan

TOKYO (AP) — A fatal crash of a U.S. Marine Corps aircraft in Hawaii has renewed safety concerns in Japan, where more of the Ospreys will be deployed.

Gov. Takeshi Onaga on the southern island of Okinawa says flights of the hybrid aircraft should be suspended until the cause of the crash is found. A tilt-rotor MV-22 Osprey caught fire after a hard landing on Sunday, killing one Marine and injuring 21 others at Bellows Air Force Station on Hawaii’s main island of Oahu.

The U.S. operates 24 Ospreys on Okinawa and announced a week ago that 10 more would be deployed to a base near Tokyo beginning in 2017.

The U.S. military says the Osprey is safe but Okinawans have worried the aircraft may be prone to crashes.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

As David Letterman Says Goodbye, Let's Not Forget "The Hal Gurnee Years"

So much as been written about David Letterman’s Swan Song. I loved the New York Times piece, “David Letterman Reflects on 33 Years in Late-Night Television,” and NYMAG.com’s “The Lost Laughs of Letterman,” where 23 (out of 90) former writers reflected on some of the “greatest jokes he never told.” Of course, there’s the greatest late-night bandleader of all time, Paul Shaffer: “Paul Shaffer Ready to Disband the CBS Orchestra As ‘Letterman’ Wraps Up” by the AP.

Let’s talk about Hal Gurnee, who directed David Letterman’s NBC daytime show (1980) and both late night shows (“Late Night with David Letterman” on NBC and “Late Show with David Letterman” on CBS) for 13 years (1982 – 1995). That’s where I come in. It was 1989 — the year Taylor Swift was born and the year this cub reporter was assigned to do a behind-the-scenes feature story on Dave’s director for Us Weekly magazine. I got to spend a day with Dave, Hal, and the eclectic group of staff writers and crew who showed up that day.

Photo of writer Pat Gallagher and Hal Gurnee
hal gurnee

Just before the feature was to be published, Hal’s wife, Joan, died suddenly so Us Weekly decided to put off running it. To make a long story short, time passed, staff editors at Us Weekly slowly left, replaced with a newer crop, time marched on and the story never ran. So, in the name of nostalgia — and to pay tribute to one of the best directors David Letterman ever had the pleasure of working with — here is that piece in it’s entirety (which will give you an idea of just how a late-night comedy talk show gets off the ground each day).

Fade In: It’s 9:30 AM on a cold, blustery day in New York City (1989). “Late Night” director Hal Gurnee, dressed in tan chinos, a blue oxford shirt and brown loafers, sits alone in his toy-box size, 14th floor office, eating some dry cereal laced with skim milk, waiting for staff members to show up to discuss various details of that vertiginous late-night show he directs: “Late Night With David Letterman.”

A visitor entering Gurnee’s office would immediately become mesmerized by his decorative walls. They’re covered with over 50 framed pictures of celebrities who have been photographed holding a “picture” close to their face of his beloved dog, Bert. The office looks like a correctional facility for tiny tots who tease small puppies. One could sit in the small office for hours gazing at the many huge stars who show kindness to animals by posing for these unique 8x10s (Burt Reynolds and Bert; Pee Wee Herman and Bert; Mickey Mangle and Bert… and the list goes on and on.)

When this reporter enters his domain, Gurnee begins to talk about his past — directing the likes of Jack Paar, Joey Bishop, David Frost and Jimmy Dean’s puppet, Rolf). His friend of 27 years — associate director, Pete Fatovich — pokes his head in the door. “Hal’s a great director, and a great human being,” Fatovich announces.

Gurnee turns the tape recorder toward Fatovich, saying playfully, “Pete, when you do the positive things, speak up. And if you’re gonna trash me, keep your voice down.”

A moment later, producer Robert Morton peeks in to offer a rehearsed statement about Hal: “Hal…is…the…kindest…sweetest…man…I’ve…ever…met.”

“See,” jokes Gurnee, “he’s been brainwashed too. I’ll be in later to reprogram you, Bob.”

The staff and crew love this jocose, mild-mannered director. Show business reeks of horror stories about directors who are temperamental, unreasonable hotheads. But after spending many hours on the set of “Late Night,” it became obvious that Hal Gurnee is, indeed, the kind, witty, generous soul the “Late Night” staffers brag about. And his contributions to the show are priceless. He invented the sky cam and the thrill cam — which is one of his favorite inventions. “I thought it would be great to create a camera that seemed to zoom through space out of control,” laughs Gurnee.

So let’s jump on that thrill cam and take a Gurnee’s Journey. Or, the theme paper might be titled: “A Day In The Life Of A Big-Time Network Director Plus Some Harmless ‘Late Night’ Trivia.”

Throughout the day, Gurnee makes contact with many of the 85 staff and crew members who come together each day to put a fresh new show on the air for the purpose of entertaining the moles and insomniacs who stay up until the wee hours of the morning. Writers stagger into his office to solicit his opinion on and off during the day. This minute, Gurnee has to make a decision which Goodyear Blimp slide to use for this evening’s taping. (It’s the “Goodyear ‘Bite Me’ Blimp Night.”) The special-effects guy needs to discuss the electronic sparkles they’ll be using to introduce the new set.

Take One: 2:30 PM. Time to rehearse. Inside NBC Studio 6A, where the temperature is so low you could store a side of beef, Gurnee strolls past two lighting guys who grab him. They have to decide how to fix the glare that bounces onto the studio floor. It detracts Dave. After that mess is cleared up. Gurnee sympathizes with Kevin, the cue-card-guy, who claims to have had pneumonia three times since he’s worked there; then he wanders into his professional cubby hole, the “Late Night” control room filled with monitors and hundreds of buttons that control only God-knows-what. It’s located just outside the double doors, down the hall to the right of the studio (where Dave has taken inquisitive viewers many a night to watch Hal do his shtick). Hal cooked chili in the control room one night, flavoring it with a rusty old headset, then serving it up to hungry crew members.

Take Two: Gurnee poses for a photographer (assigned to take photos for this piece) inside the dark control room. He tells the crew that “Boy’s Life” is doing an article on him. “They’ve been trying to get me for years,” he jokes. As the avuncular, soft-spoken director leans back in his blue cushioned sway-back chair, hands clasped behind his head, he announces: “This is my Ted Koppel look.” Another pose: “This is my ironic look.”

Gurnee’s slick, buoyant humor serves him well. “Late Night” is, after all, a comedy show which means the creative team has to deliver the goods or the studio audience goes home unamused. (And if the audience stops laughing, Letterman and his staff will wake up one day in a GE warehouse threading tungsten wire into light bulbs.) Gurnee’s contribution to the humor of the show is essential. Letterman says it’s immeasurable. “Hal contributes in ways that I could never have imagined or dreamed of, both with his directing and also with his suggestions about almost every aspect of the show… I think that if somebody else were directing this show, the finished product by comparison would be greatly diminished,” Letterman boasts.

Take Three: Control room etiquette. Head writer Steve O’Donnell walks in like he’s checking crew members for lice. He paces back and forth behind Gurnee, who now has his mind on camera shots. O’Donnell is dressed in a brown outfit that suggests maybe he has little, or no sense of fashion. This wise reporter asks him to recite in 25 words or less how Hal Gurnee contributes to this program. “Most of us are really afraid of him,” O’Donnell says with a straight face.

(Then comes the truth and O’Donnell’s version of the infamous show business pie theory.) “There are three funny slices to the show pie,” O’Donnell volunteers. “Dave would be a big funny slice,the writers contribute another slice, but Hal’s selection of what he decides to cut away to and the way he zooms in on things — whether it’s the stoney-faced audience member or a stagehand just smoking a cigarette behind the production doors — it just always makes things very, very funny.”

“The real job,” Gurnee offers, “is to see things and seize the opportunities to make things look good and to surprise people. That’s where your value as a director is.”

Gurnee likes to take random camera shots that surprises even Letterman. Sometimes he’ll take a spontaneous shot of bandleader Paul Shaffer, catching Shaffer off guard. The audience laughs because Shaffer is usually in his Goober-like trance. “It gives a wrap-around view of what’s going on in the studio,” Gurnee points out. “On another show, the host might say, ‘What the hell is that? People have come to see me, not Paul Shaffer,’ but Dave is not that way. Dave understands and likes the fact that other people are included.”

Ready, action: Letterman walks by the control room sticking his head in to say, “Hal, I’m here.” Dave, who is rehearsal ready wearing sweat pants and a heavy-duty college sweatshirt, walks through the double doors to the studio, sits down at his desk on the set, then hollers: “Hal, you’ve got to fix that shower in my office! Every time I get in, I get soaked!”

Hal responds, dry humor in tact: “Sure, Dave, I’ll have somebody look at it.”

A great comeback.

Of course, Gurnee is used to great comebacks. Letterman has been introducing him as Hal Gertner for years. And the late-night viewing audiences have been listening to his retorts: “It’s Gurnee, Dave.” It’s a running joke that Gurnee laughs about. “We did a little remote with some actors, and after it was over, one of the actors wrote me a little note saying, ‘Thank you for hiring me, I think you’re a terrific director, Hal Gertner.’ I showed it to Dave, and Dave got a big kick out if it so about a week later, sure enough, he used it.”

Remote visit: During a lull in the festivities in the control room, it’s back upstairs to the office complex where Gurnee reflects back on his seven years with “Late Night” and talks about Dave’s personal life. Most viewers would probably never guess, for instance, that Dave dates a woman named Betina who has a huge black mole in the middle of her back. (Not sure how Hal knows this… but he kids.) In the meantime, two more unnamed writers run into the office to give more testimony about their director: “Hal is the Dean of Directors,” says one writer whose clothes are on the verge of dry rotting.

Take four: Dave takes a moment to share a deep dark secret about his close personal friend, Hal Gertner: “I know for a time when Hal got out of the service, he worked in some clubs here in New York City as a female impersonator.”

Cue Top 10 List: If Dave were pressed to do a Top Ten list of television directors that anybody had ever heard of since about 1947, the list would be redundant. All 10 would be: Hal Gurnee. Short TV quiz; Who directed “Pete and Gladys” in 1960? Who directed “The Merv Griffin Show?” Who directs “Rosanne?” Answer: Who cares? The point: Hal Gurnee is possibly the only living television director who is so intimately involved in a television extravaganza both behind and in front of the camera. Real people actually know his name.

Flashback: Summer of ’88. During that unfortunate writer’s strike, Gurnee helped Dave by offering up “Hal Gurnee’s Network Time Killers,” his idea to have circus performers come in and tumble some time away during the slow parts of the show.

The bit, though, that seemed to generate the most excitement was Dave’s rendition of “What is Hal Wearing?” Every night for what seemed like weeks, Dave would check in the control room asking, “Hal, what are you wearing tonight?” Each night Hal would stand up to show off those preppie threads: tan Chinos, a blue oxford shirt and brown loafers. The truth is, he really does wear this same ensemble every day. “I have five oxford shirts, three pair of Chinos that will last a week… and the shoes,” Hal admits.

A group of high school students from East St. Louis High School went into a state of fabric shock after watching this bit every night. They dressed themselves up in the Gurnee outfit and declared a “Hal Gurnee Day.” “I got a big kick out of that because it was one of those silly ideas Dave had and look what happened to it,” Gurnee laughs. (He has a picture of this senior class wearing the Gurnee threads hanging on office wall.)

Cut to: 5:30 PM. Show time. Control room crew in place, Gurnee cues the theme music. Bill Wendell gives the introduction. Dave enters stage left. The show is under way. Just before bit player Chris Elliott makes an appearance on stage, he moseys over to his pal Hal, plants a big fat wet one on his lips and hands him a little payola. (Close-ups seem to be important to Chris.) Hal, who is watching Dave closely on several monitors, raises his thick eyebrows and accepts the cash.

After the show, the crew disburses. Gurnee holds a cold compress on Dave’s forehead while other staffers hand him some old clothes to change into. Then it’s back upstairs to the office complex for a meeting to discuss the next day’s show. After all is said and done, Gurnee vacuums Dave’s office, walks four blocks to his apartment and reads silently.

Earlier on Huff/Post50:

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

In Praise Of Involved Fathers From Single Dads Who've Been There

This piece was co-authored by Joe Seldner and Ken Solin — two very involved fathers.

Joe
All the chatter about fathers not being involved in their children’s lives sometimes confuses those of us who had the privilege of raising our children by ourselves.

We wouldn’t have had it any other way, so it is difficult to comprehend why any father would not want to be involved, or for that matter, why any mother would object to dad playing a significant role in the lives of their children.

2015-05-08-1431115161-6564696-singledad2.jpg

And yet … many dads don’t step up, and far too many mothers block the involvement of the male parent.

The jury has long been in on the value of fathers in helping shape the lives of their children. There are still people out there who doubt and debate this, but then, there are still people who dispute that smoking is bad for one’s health or that Neil Armstrong walked anywhere that looked like a moonscape other than a Hollywood set.

I raised my kids alone from the ages of 11 and 8. “Alone” means different things to different people. In my case, it was about as alone as one can get. For the first six years of my single parenting, I received no child support, certainly no alimony, and no help with any of the formidable responsibilities of parenting. Then, my ex-wife passed away, so the “singleness” if anything, intensified.

All of which was fine — better than fine. Single parenting, as I often say, was the best experience of my life (whether my kids share that view is something you would have to ask them).

It trumped career, which I once pursued with the best of them, and money (I guess — never had much of that).

The playing field is still uneven when it comes to child custody. Mothers get sole physical custody much more often than fathers, though in contested cases – where fathers aggressively fight for custody — the numbers are more equitable, almost 50-50, which, frankly, is as it should be.

But the issue isn’t about custody. It’s about fatherly involvement, something that should occur as much as possible whether dad is divorced, widowed, has adopted, or has just decided fatherhood is a vital part of his life.

Ken
I married when I was 21 in the late 1960s. Our son was born a year later, and my wife went back to Europe after we divorced. I raised my infant son while simultaneously kickstarting my career after college. It was an incredible challenge that I met with a young man’s energy and determination.

I didn’t have a social life, but I created an unbreakable bond with my son, David. I hold single mothers in high regard because I empathize with their task.

David recently showed me a photo of the two of us when he was five that looks like two boys. I didn’t know much about raising an infant, and there wasn’t much information then. I figured it out daily.

David is a 48-year-old father of a 10-year-old boy. The circumstances of a bitter divorce forced him to court to fight for 50 percent physical custody. He couldn’t afford attorney’s fees, so he read the legal books, represented himself, and prevailed, an impressive victory considering his layman’s status.

2015-05-08-1431115187-7100957-singledad1.jpg

I wish circumstances had been different for me and for my son in terms of raising our boys, but we both stepped up. I have no regrets, and neither does David. It’s what men are supposed to do, and I’m hard-pressed to understand a man who shirks such a sacred responsibility.

Most boomers have already raised their children, but many of our children are faced with divorce and becoming single parents. We should encourage them to assume their parental responsibilities no matter how difficult the circumstances.

I hope the family courts wake up to the notion that fathers are equally important to a child’s wellbeing, and that the primary caregiver label no longer has an automatic gender designation.

If you’re a divorced father don’t surrender to the struggle so many men face trying to assume parental responsibility. This is one time when stubbornness is actually a virtue. Your son or daughter needs you in their life. Your involvement is the key to their future in so many important ways. Participating in raising your child is a unique aspect of your manhood that you’ll benefit from for the rest of your life.

Earlier on Huff/Post50:

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

What Happened When I Learned To Cry And Laugh

I was raised to believe that feelings were like alcohol: something to be experienced only in moderation, if at all. Yeah, it might be OK to laugh a bit or tell your lover that you love them, but most of the time feelings just got in the way. So I’d start to feel angry or afraid or sad and then “get a grip” and shove it away so I could carry on.

I became master of the poker face.

Life in the Pressure Cooker
Thing is, the feeling was still there, like water in a pressure cooker. And it would leak out in my body language or as snide remarks or in my demeanor. Other times the pressure would build up to the point that I’d blow off steam all at once — a huge burst of feeling out of scale to what was really happening (aka “going postal), once with near disastrous results for my career.

The truth was that while I was tamping down all those feelings so I could control them, they were really controlling me.

Going with What Comes Up
So rather than spending energy to tamp down those pesky emotions even more, I took the opposite tack. Taking a cue from the Japanese martial art of Aikido, I began to go with the flow of emotions rather than resist them. I learned to experience them as waves, sometimes big and sometimes small. The results were surprising.

My first step to mastering emotional literacy was to notice when I was having an emotion. After years of ignoring emotions, it took some time to recognize the clues. First, there were the body sensations — tension in my back or jaw for anger, butterflies in my stomach for fear, tightness in my throat for sadness. I began to use them as an early warning system for emotions and pay attention to what was happening “down there” (anywhere below the cerebral cortex that had served me so well as a business executive).

Then came the hard part: instead of ignoring it, or distracting myself with thoughts or words, I learned to just be still and make space for that emotion to blossom. That was scary: what if others noticed I was sad or angry or scared or even happy? Thing is, they were noticing it already because it was leaking out despite my poker face. So I was doing everyone a favor by dropping the charade.

Go Big or Go Home
Sometimes it was enough to just notice the body sensations, realize I was having an emotion and let it go — like a little coffee break for the soul.

Other times, the emotions wanted bigger expression — a sound or a movement to really let it out there. Maybe an NFL end zone dance or a roar of anger. Sometimes just shaking my hands or wiggling my fingers was enough.

Regardless of whether the expression was big or small, silent or loud, the result was the same: I felt refreshed, enlivened and relaxed. Rather than spending my energy faking a poker face and holding in real feelings, I was giving myself the luxury of full expression. At first it was scary, but as I practiced, I became more comfortable and so did the people around me, to the point I could say something to myself like: “Today is Tuesday, and I feel angry (or sad or scared or happy).”

The Payoff
I began using my emotions as clues pointing to important issues — why was I feeling angry about being asked to edit the website? Was the fear I felt before giving a speech a reminder to double-check my presentation slides? Was I feeling sad because I knew I was about to make a big move and leave behind people or places I cared about?

There were other benefits, too. The people around me got to feel closer to me — they were getting a genuine experience rather than a facade.

I began to feel closer to them, too; I got good at noticing their feelings and intuiting what was going on with those around me. That allowed me to connect more effectively with others.

I didn’t just experience the benefits at home. I also saw a positive impact in my business life. Nearly 20 years ago, researcher Daniel Goleman studied the qualities of successful leaders and found that while intelligence and skill were important, the biggest differentiator of successful leaders was their ability to notice, befriend and manage their emotions.

Tim Peek is a certified executive coach who advises leaders and their teams on using disruption, consciousness, and strategy to create their desired future. www.peekdisruption.com

Meg Dennison is a certified conscious leadership coach who has reinvented herself many times. She coaches busy women midpoint in their life or career to consciously create their next step based on genius and life goals. www.megdennison.com

Together, Meg and Tim write about how they turned around what had become a stale and uninspiring 28-year marriage to return to the passion and purpose to their lives. Motivated executives come to Meg and Tim for help reinvigorating their careers, companies and intimate relationships.

Click here to get their free report and weekly blog delivered to your inbox.

Earlier on Huff/Post50:

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.