'Buffy The Vampire Slayer' Actor Nicholas Brendon Arrested For Fourth Time In 7 Months

“Buffy The Vampire Slayer” alum Nicholas Brendon was arrested for public intoxication in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, on Saturday, according to multiple reports.

A rep for Brendon tweeted Saturday that they would not issue a statement regarding the arrest:

On Sunday, the 44-year-old posted a photo of himself on Twitter and addressed the incident in a response to a fan:

The public intoxication charge marks the “Buffy” star’s fourth arrest in seven months. In October 2014, he was arrested in a hotel in Idaho on misdemeanor charges of resisting officers and malicious injury to property after Brendon became intoxicated and broke a decorative dish. He was again arrested in February 2015 for felony grand theft after he refused to pay the bill at a Florida hotel. In March 2015, the actor was arrested and charged with criminal mischief and property damage at another Florida hotel.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Is Jeb's Mulligan on Iraq Convincing or a Tar Baby He Can't Escape?

2014-05-05-BothSides_WebsiteBanner_728x90_041421.jpg

LISTEN HERE:

By Mark Green

Jeb and TPP had second chances this week — will they work? And what explains Stephanopoulos’s gift to the Clinton Foundation? Rich Lowry and David Corn of National Review and Mother Jones debate these three “oops’s”. Then: who’s “stupid” — Dems for linking Amtrak funding and the Philly derailing or Boehner for de-linking them?

*George and Jeb and Iraq. It took four tries for Jeb Bush to be able to answer the question — was the U.S. right to invade Iraq if we knew then what we know now?

Rich assumes that Jeb Bush answered the question he was briefed for, not the question that was asked. “But it’s a long campaign and this won’t matter much.” He adds that Jeb’s people explain that in earlier campaigns he was judged as a “Bush” but then exceeded expectations when he was judged on his own merits. (Host: but when he won his second campaign for Florida Governor, George was a Democrat-friendly bro without a war on his vitae.)

David, who co-wrote a book about the intel that misled us into war, insists that the issue is not a hypothetical nor what we’ve learned since that March, 2003 decision but rather how Bush-Cheney “hyped the intelligence” to get us into a war that the Downing Street Memo, many U.S. intelligence experts and the U. N. thought unnecessary.

Host: Either way, I think that Jeb is pretty screwed since the details are not as important as the irreversible connection between him and a very popular brother and war — “don’t pay attention to the red elephant in the room!” can’t work. Short of a Sister Soljah moment where he breaks with his brother’s mother — ok, with his brother’s VP — this is merely the first of many ways he’ll be tied to the mast of W…and we haven’t even gotten to torture, the economy, Katrina. Rubio and Clinton should doing a jig because of the size of his political problem and incompetence after having 13 years to prepare an answer. Hillary has no equivalent burden and has already smartly broken with Bill on mass incarceration.

*Stephanopouos and Clintons. The face of ABC News donated money to the Clinton’s Foundation — ok because of the philanthropic cause and prior relationship or a lapse since he has to cover it and them?

Rich thinks this was an “incredible lapse of judgment” since he knew that he would be covering them… which became obvious during his tough interview of Peter Schweizer on his book ClintonCash. David agrees it was a lapse since “he could always find ways to donate to such causes without any conflict of interest.”

*Trans-Pacific Partnership. This off-again, on-again trade deal among 12 Pacific Rim nations is splitting Warren and Rubin Democrats. Rich supports the TPP but seems pleased that Democrats are now suffering Obama’s condescending, arrogant manner “which has driven Republicans crazy before.” David concurs that Obama was too personal in his tone to Warren but also questions whether the deal will be good or bad for labor and the environment. That will turn on the unknown details when the House takes up the actual Pact and decides what to do about currency manipulations that hurt our exports and the enforcement mechanism.

Will Warren end up voting for it? David thinks not because of unresolved questions of what it might do to Wall Street Reform and court decisions that a world body might supercede on trade grounds.

On Letterman and Mad Men. Corn argues that Letterman lasted 33 years because he brought “sardonic cynicism” to Middle America and that Don Draper ends up doing info-commercials while Peggy runs for the Senate. The Host informs the George Polk recipient that, in fact, Draper and the waitress will end up back at the house he grew up as they fix it up in a major Rosebud ending. Of course, by the time this is read, we’ll know if the Host is prophetic or pathetic.

*Amtrak and Congress. Coincidentally, the day after the deadly derailment in Philadelphia, Congress takes up big cuts to the service. Awk-ward… or stupid to link the two?

Rich thinks that money was not the problem in this derailment and that Amtrak is already massively subsidized and inefficient. David notes that Congress does subsidize trains, like all other Western economies, and that the “dead switch” technology was late in arriving at the deadly curve.

*FLOTUS and Limbaugh. Is Michelle Obama right to share with African-American students at Tuskegee her experiences with racial slights — or is this “playing the race card,” as Rush Limbaugh argues?

Rich lauds the First Lady for going to Tuskegee given its history of young students courageously flying in World War II… but thinks it unseemly that “a woman who has everything” would stoop to engage in complaints about “micro-aggressions.” David chides him for presuming to tell Michelle and black students whether being followed around stores or treated as “the help” at social functions is no big deal or worthy of illumination.

Mark Green is the creator and host of Both Sides Now.

You can follow him on Twitter @markjgreen

Send all comments to Bothsidesradio.com, where you can also listen to prior shows.

2013-04-22-PREMIERElogo.png

Both Sides Now is available Sat. 5-6 PM EST From Lifestyle TalkRadio Network & Sun. 8-9 AM EST from Business RadioTalk Network.

2014-03-03-BizTalk_Logo1.jpg

2014-10-19-ConsumerReports.png

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Skateboarding's First Wave: Back to the '60s in Our 60s

2015-05-15-1431717343-9045698-PSTforHuffPost.jpg
Left to right men (back), women (front): Terry Keller, Tod Burton, Peter Burg, Tim Keller, Ric Burgess, Don Burgess, Donna (Cash) Harris, Wendy (Bearer) Bull, Suzi (Rowland) Levin, Colleen (Boyd) Turner

When I first got the call that we were going to be in a “then and now” skateboarding documentary, I was delighted, curious and totally freaked out. How was I ever going to skateboard in my 60s like I did in the ’60s? As it turned out, the production of Skateboarding’s First Wave was a delightful experience for all involved which resulted in a high-quality, very entertaining film contribution to the history of skateboarding.

In 2013, Tim Keller, the former 14-year-old leader of the Palisades Skateboard Team in Los Angeles, California (one of the top teams in the country in the ’60s), wrote an article about the team and the beginnings of skateboarding called Skateboarding’s First Wave: A Palisades Story. This led then 9-year-old Donny of the team — now Don Burgess, not so little, a grandfather, and an Academy Award-nominated cinematographer (Forrest Gump) — to look for some vintage skateboarding footage that his father had taken of the group. When he found it, Tim and Don called for a reunion to do a short documentary comparing the “back in the day” shoots with footage and interviews of us fifty to sixty somethings on our skateboards today.

Come “game day” for the filming, I showed up with all of my safety gear, but none of the other team members were wearing any. I’d already made one trip to the emergency room during my first practice session and was determined not to have to go back. Although no one told me not to use the protective gear, unfortunately, I let myself feel peer-pressured into leaving it in my car. Most cautiously, I decided to take the hill sideways in the slowest possible way. Yet within seconds, my board flew out from under me, and I was flat on the asphalt with a horrific-looking bloody elbow.

I refused to go to the emergency room even though I probably needed at least five stitches and had some kind of minor fracture. My injuries would heal, but when would I ever get another chance to be in a skateboarding movie? Director Don compassionately had his crew film me doing simple kick turns on a flat surface so I could still appear in the movie. Fearing another tumble and in pain, I was so cautious that I looked positively geriatric. The exhales of onlookers were audible when I finished without incident. “That’s a wrap!” never sounded so good. Why, oh why had I stopped going to yoga class? It did so much for my balance.

Looking back, it’s hard to believe what we did on those boards as kids. What was exhilarating then now looks downright scary to me. We didn’t realize at the time that we were being pioneers. We just loved skateboarding, and the more difficult the challenge, the more we liked it!

2015-05-17-1431887993-9976504-SkateboardingsFirstWaveStillNarrowLight.jpg
Palisades Skateboard Team c. 1965

The reunion party was a hoot! We shared all of the old stories — at least, what we senior citizens could still remember. We had a lot to catch up on, since most of us hadn’t seen each other since high school. I learned a number of important details from the others that I had forgotten from my youth — some of which I didn’t want to remember — and a lot about the twists and turns of our lives. There were those who didn’t make it, who had died or succumbed to drug abuse and other life challenges. We knew we were the lucky ones.

Not only did the documentary juxtapose the old and modern footage of our team effectively, but it also creatively incorporated skateboarding cuts from other films, television commercials, and popular shows at the time like What’s My Line?, Shindig!, and ABC’s Wide World of Sports. The musical soundtrack was even composed by one of the team members, singer and songwriter Peter Burg. My children and in-laws joined me at the premiere, and we were very impressed with how well it turned out. It is now being shown at various forums like the Newport Film Festival, and the feedback has been wonderful!

Without exaggeration, I was the worst current-day skater of the bunch. That 50-year break took quite a toll on me. I could not skateboard in my sixties like I did in the Sixties, at least not without more preparation, but the others could. I don’t know how they managed to hop back on their boards so skillfully with little practice and end up with no more than one skinned knee in the bunch. Yet despite the cuts and bruises, I am very glad I participated. The ordeal also gave me a jump-start for my new fitness program of pedometer-motivated walking, weight training, and swimming. I’ve even gone back to yoga. Maybe one day I’ll provide a comeback story for septuagenarians (if I can remember how to spell it)!

Most importantly, our team came to appreciate the bond we had from those days. We helped to invent a sport — no small challenge and contribution. And girls had so few sporting options then. Skateboarding represented a way to compete when other avenues were closed. We gave each other the courage to reject the idea that girls didn’t belong on a skateboard as there were so few of us in our community. And this courage about where we belonged transferred to other arenas throughout our lives. Thankfully, the boys encouraged us, and they grew up to be rather impressive gentlemen — hardly the skateboarder stereotype.

While I have no interest in ever doing a half-pipe (a modern skateboarding ramp), when it comes time to autograph the vintage skateboarding cards that have yet to be invented, I’ll be ready. And getting back in shape has become my top priority of late. After all, who else will teach my granddaughter how to skateboard if I don’t?

Skateboarding’s First Wave is showing at Dances With Films in Hollywood, California, on June 2, 2015, at 2:45 p.m. and at Palisades High School in Pacific Palisades, California, on June 13 at 2 p.m.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Kendall Jenner Gives Us A Sneak Peek Of Balmain x H&M At The 2015 Billboard Music Awards

Kendall Jenner hit the red carpet at the 2015 Billboard Music Awards in Balmain x H&M, the latest collaboration from the Swedish retail giant, which was kept under wraps until now. Olivier Rousteing, the creative director for Balmain (and a dear friend of the Kardashian family), took to Instagram to announce the news, posing with Jenner and model Jourdan Dunn en route to the event:

H&M announced on Twitter that the collection will be available on November 5, 2015. The retail giant has collaborated with other designers in the past: Stella McCartney, Lanvin, Alexander Wang and more have worked with the Swedish store to create affordable clothing and accessories. Considering the buzz on social media surrounding the announcement, we imagine this collection will sell out ASAP.

Check out all the red carpet fabulousness from the 2015 Billboard Music Awards below!

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Jennifer Lopez Stuns In A Sheer Dress At The 2015 Billboard Music Awards

Jennifer Lopez has done it again. Just two weeks after wowing us in a sheer dress at the Met Gala, she stepped out for the 2015 Billboard Music Awards on Sunday night in an equally revealing design.

jennifer lopez billboard music awards dress

jennifer lopez

The white-and-nude Charbel Zoe gown was embellished with strategically placed beads to cover just enough of Lopez’s breasts and behind. However there was plenty of cleavage on display and her midriff was completely exposed. The singer/actress is known for her barely-there red carpet style, so we shouldn’t be surprised.

What do you think of J.Lo’s latest look that leaves almost nothing to the imagination — tell us in the comments section below. And make sure to check out all the red carpet moments in the slideshow.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Candidates Win Evangelicals With Pro-American Worker Immigration Policy

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, an expected GOP presidential candidate, drew the ire of the political right and left recently over his comments on immigration. When it comes to the immigration issue, Republicans are expected to use the tried and true, consultant tested “secure the border” talking point and move on to other issues.

Gov. Walker, like former U.S. Senator, Rick Santorum, has taken things further than just a discussion of illegal immigration. They have dared to discuss the impact of legal immigration on American workers. Like most Republicans, I’m still undecided about the Presidential field. But I have an enormous amount of respect for these guys and what they have done as they campaign. I applaud their statements on immigration and their willingness to go against the status quo on immigration.

What radical proposal could have inspired attacks from liberal media outlets like MSNBC, Mother Jones magazine and the Huffington Post as well as The Wall Street Journal and establishment Republicans such as Senators Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and ?

“In terms of legal immigration, how we need to approach that going forward is saying — the next president and the next Congress need to make decisions about a legal immigration system that’s based on, first and foremost, on protecting American workers and American wages,” stated Governor Walker during an interview with Glenn Beck.

According to the elites, an immigration system “based, first and foremost, on protecting American workers and American wages” is unacceptable. But how does this resonate with voters?

According to a poll last week at Evangelicals for Biblical Immigration, evangelical voters, a key voting bloc in the early Republican primary states, prefer an immigration policy that gives priority to American workers.

The survey polled evangelical voters nationwide on if they were aware of the “2016 presidential candidates talking about whether to cut or increase annual legal immigration” and they were then asked their opinion about types of statements being made by potential presidential candidates without mentioning any name or party.

By a 4-1 margin, evangelicals “strongly supported” (rather than “strongly opposed”) a statement that legal immigration should be cut because “the priority for U.S. immigration policy should be to protect American workers and their wages.”

Only 24 percent of evangelicals agreed that our current level of immigration, about one million per year, should stay the same or be increased. About the same number (25 percent) said annual legal immigration should be cut to zero. Most wanted legal immigration cut by at least half.

When it comes to amnesty, only 26 percent strongly or somewhat supported a priority of offering work permits and citizenship to illegal immigrants currently in the country, while 67 percent strongly or somewhat opposed it. Also by a 12-1 margin, evangelical voters said it is “more moral” for new jobs to go to unemployed Americans and legal immigrants already here than to give illegal immigrants an equal right to compete for the jobs.

Candidates that wish to enlist the support from evangelical voters would be wise to advocate policies that prioritize American workers when it comes to immigration. That means opposing rewarding illegal aliens with work permits so they can compete with U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents for jobs. It also means reordering our legal immigration system to protect the jobs and wages of American workers. Candidates that do not advocate a pro-American worker immigration system will find life difficult on the campaign trail.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Washington Post's Reid Wilson Joins Morning Consult To Launch Congress Section

NEW YORK — Washington Post political reporter Reid Wilson is leaving the paper to launch a Congress section for Morning Consult, a growing digital politics and policy outlet. Wilson will serve as the both Congress editor and chief political correspondent.

The addition of Wilson signals an expansion into congressional coverage for Morning Consult, which claims to reach 150,000 politics and policy insiders through email briefings focused on health, energy, finance and tech. Wilson, who was previously editor-in-chief of The Hotline and worked at The Hill and RealClearPolitics, is the biggest hire yet for the newsroom of eight full-time reporters.

While Morning Consult doesn’t have the name recognition of his most recent employer, Wilson suggested in an email that the journalism from its small staff will stand out by supplementing reporting with data from the company’s weekly national polls, sent out to 2,000 registered voters.

“The polling industry is going through a complete revolution, and decision makers are using the sorts of polls Morning Consult conducts to make strategic moves,” Wilson said. “We’re going to spot trends before they develop into the next big story.”

“The fact that we can bring so much data to the table is going to set us apart,” he added. “And I love the startup energy of the place. It feels like the next generation of Hotline.”

Michael Ramlet, the site’s publisher and founder, originally launched Morning Consult as a health care email while in college and began building it into a media company in 2013. Meghan McCarthy, a veteran of National Journal and Congressional Quarterly, joined that year and currently serves as editor-in-chief.

Though Ramlet has advised Republicans on policy matters, he said in an email that Morning Consult’s coverage has always been nonpartisan. Ramlet has a second company, Paragon Insights, which conducts private polling for partisan clients.

Morning Consult is supported by advertisements in its insider-focused email newsletters and sponsored polls, which the company recently introduced. Ramlet said the success of its healthcare briefing ads prompted him to expand into congressional coverage.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Billboard Music Awards Red Carpet Was Fabulous Per Usual

Some of the biggest stars in music and beyond were in Las Vegas on Sunday night attending the 2015 Billboard Music Awards. The annual event never disappoints when it comes to hot performances and an equally impressive red carpet.

We spotted style stars like Taylor Swift, Zendaya, and Iggy Azalea all looking fabulous in eye-catching designs. Supermodel Chrissy Teigen, the show’s co-host, was also on hand and stunned in a sparkly, striped jumpsuit.

But it was Jennifer Lopez who really tuned heads in a see-through Charbel Zoe gown that really

What were the rest of the celebs wearing tonight on the 2015 BBMA red carpet? Check out the slideshow and tell us your faves in the comments section below!

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

A Conversation With Robert Johnson

2015-05-17-1431903858-3087499-prb.jpg

I interviewed Robert Johnson at the Institute of New Economic Thinking’s annual conference in Hong Kong. Johnson is the President of the Institute and a man with a fascinating background.

He received a Ph.D. and M.A. in Economics from Princeton University and a B.S. in both Electrical Engineering and Economics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was a Managing Director at Soros Fund Management where he managed a global currency, bond and equity portfolio specializing in emerging markets.

Currently, he serves a Senior Fellow and Director of the Global Finance Project for the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute in New York. What’s more, Johnson was an Executive Producer of the Oscar winning documentary, Taxi to the Dark Side, directed by Alex Gibney, and is the former President of the National Scholastic Chess Foundation.

In this interview, Johnson talked about how old models of financial markets are not adequate to govern our society and markets in the future. In particular, his two lessons on staying humble and using music as a source of inspiration stand out

Patrick Daniel: Are we changing the guard?

Robert Johnson: There are certain dimensions in which we are. One is that father time kills off older generation and hands it over to the new. And in that respect we are inevitably changing. The recent experience and continued experience with emerging economies relative to developed economies suggests there has been a very profound balance of power shift. And I would also say that within economics itself, mechanistic obsession with models and statistics is giving way to a more textured, more institutional, more historical approach. More human qualities, and less false precision. So I think there is an intellectual change. Also within the realm of economic ideology the simplistic model that markets exist and that politics and government are distinct and separate is giving way to a more organic sensibility about political economy. The integration of state and markets, incentives and relationship with the government, whether rules are enforced or not, enforced on the powerful or just on the weak, all of these questions can now be addressed with more vigor. So there is a changing in the guard towards reaffirmation of the political economy.

Daniel: What is an important truth or something you believe that few people agree with you on?

Johnson: There are very few people that agree with me on the limitations of the models. I believe much more like Frank Knight that people are vulnerable to manipulation, propagandistic techniques and things in this nature. People are like electoral systems that depend on campaigns that can be distorted. People don’t disagree with me on that part, but they disagree with me on the capacity of a large body politic to make decisions. There is a romance about democracy. It makes it hard because you get these very hopeful people on the liberal end of the spectrum they are always: “Make it more democratic.” I once teased a guy at the Federal Reserve. [I asked him], do you think we should all go on the Internet and vote on what to do with the Federal Funds rate every six weeks? Or do you want to delegate it to 12 people? I think I would like to see equality but I don’t know that democracy would produce equality. The final thing I would say is that they have not examined the tension between large scale enterprise as efficient on cost basis and therefore justified as the most competitive in the economy and the implications of this large institutions juxtaposed against people in the political context where they have resources, PR, they can resort to propaganda and lobbying. So the large corporates can disenfranchise the individual and that creates very awkward distortion of politics. I don’t know if many people dwell on that. It is a different concern of mine probably because I worked in government.

Daniel: Do you think there is a question that nobody is asking? An issue that needs more attention?

Johnson: What do you do when you have no idea what the future looks like with financial regulation? In other words there is no stable anchor from equilibrium in the future. There is no way of understanding what the structure will be. There might be radical uncertainty. And how do people behave when there is no anchor? It is very important to design financial institutions, financial systems, what role things play like lender of last resort. All of these things will be drawn into a different focus if you don’t find a future to anchor with.

Daniel: Is there any topic or issue that is really on your mind?

Johnson: What’s on my mind at the moment is a new thought of mine. I think people have a yearning for order. They want to understand what the rules are. What happens in a society that is unfair is the moralization. What happens in a society where nobody understands the rules? It raises anxiety. And the anxiety persists. It allows legitimacy to authoritarian behavior. And I think this is a very dangerous time of transitioning this function that has been prolonged. The trust is broken down in governments. It is not the task of the government to maintain the relationship between multi-national enterprises and society. Let me tell you about Tim Geithner. I pick on him because he left office. He’s got to get up every morning and convince the world he is in control of something, the world financial markets, which he knows he is in not control of. So the fear that is engendered by chaos is only counteracted by believing in something.

Daniel: On a more personal note, what has been a transformative experience when you were young that shaped your life in a tremendous way?

Johnson: The writings of Martin Luther King. Martin Luther King had this inspirational spirit, philosophical deep awareness. Second thing. I grew up in a family of sailors. And when you go off shore, you have no choice but to be humble. Whether its a thunderstorm or big seas, you know that God can take your life. And so I think there is a humility that comes from being at sea that marked my approach to life. And I think the sense is that humility is actually a survival tactic when you are at sea. Because if you are really afraid, or act like I am not scared, you are a fool. Somehow being scared and not being a fool of working with your fear is a good lesson.

Daniel: That’s very interesting. Where do you draw your inspiration from?

Johnson: Music. It’s always [been] music, meshed with all the other arts. Sometimes its just a miracle, sometimes its a movie sound. Whether its the lyrics from Bob Dylan or a saxophone playing. John Coltrane, Lee Armstrong or old blues. The defiance that is contained in music is quite inspiring. When I stirred up and don’t know what I think, I try to swim through different types of music to start to realize how it is that I feel. That’s my way of working through this.

Daniel: Thank you.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Joe Biden Tells Yale Graduates To Question Judgment, Not Motives

NEW HAVEN, Conn. (AP) — Vice President Joe Biden has urged graduating Yale University students to question the judgment of others, but not their motives to build consensus.

Speaking Sunday to the annual class day that’s part of commencement weekend, Biden told the more than 1,200 students and their families and friends to move beyond networking and form personal relationships. He said he learned early to not judge colleagues’ motives, which helped him find compromise in Congress.

Biden represented Delaware in the U.S. Senate for 36 years before becoming vice president.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.